Cleveland Cavaliers vs 76ers Match Player Stats

The Cleveland Cavaliers vs 76ers match player stats tell the story of a game that Cleveland controlled after a competitive opening stretch, defeating Philadelphia 115-101 at Rocket Arena on March 9, 2026. The Cavaliers entered the game at 40-25 and improved their home record to 22-12, while the 76ers fell to 34-30. Cleveland built its advantage through balanced scoring, superior three-point shooting, excellent free throw execution, and much better ball movement. The official NBA box score lists 19,432 fans in attendance and records Cleveland as the winner by 14 points.

This was not simply a game decided by one outstanding scoring performance. James Harden led Cleveland with 21 points, while Keon Ellis added 19 and Donovan Mitchell and Evan Mobley each contributed 17 and 15 points respectively. Dean Wade provided a major contribution on the glass with 10 rebounds, and Mitchell led all players with six assists. For Philadelphia, Quentin Grimes paced the team with 17 points, followed by Justin Edwards with 14 and Cameron Payne with 12.

The result also completed a four-game season sweep for Cleveland. The Cavaliers won the previous three meetings 132-121 on November 6, 133-107 on January 15, and 117-115 on January 17 before finishing the season series with the 115-101 victory.

Cleveland Cavaliers vs 76ers Match Player Stats: Game Overview

The final score was:

Team	Q1	Q2	Q3	Q4	Final
Philadelphia 76ers	20	24	22	35	101
Cleveland Cavaliers	26	30	31	28	115

The biggest difference was Cleveland’s ability to establish control during the second and third quarters. The Cavaliers led 26-20 after the opening period, extended the advantage to 56-44 by halftime, and then pushed the margin to 87-66 after three quarters.

Philadelphia did score 35 points in the fourth quarter, but by then Cleveland had already created a 21-point cushion. The official game report shows that Cleveland’s largest lead was 25 points, while Philadelphia’s largest lead was only five. There was one lead change and two ties during the contest.

The game therefore had two distinct phases. Philadelphia remained within striking distance early, but Cleveland gradually turned its offensive efficiency into separation. Once the Cavaliers established control, the 76ers could not generate enough consistent offense to recover.

Cleveland Cavaliers Offensive Performance

Cleveland finished with 115 points on 38-of-84 shooting from the field. That translated to 45.2 percent shooting overall.

The more important number was Cleveland’s perimeter efficiency. The Cavaliers made 16 of 44 three-point attempts, good for 36.4 percent. They also converted 23 of 25 free throws, an excellent 92 percent.

Those numbers reveal why Cleveland won despite Philadelphia actually shooting slightly better from the field.

The Cavaliers did not rely on field-goal percentage alone. They created additional value through three-point volume and free throws.

Cleveland’s offensive profile was:

• 38-of-84 from the field
• 16-of-44 from three-point range
• 23-of-25 from the free throw line
• 41 total rebounds
• 28 assists
• 9 turnovers
• 40 points in the paint
• 13 fast-break points
• 10 second-chance points

The 28 assists are particularly important. Cleveland was consistently moving the ball and generating scoring opportunities for multiple players rather than forcing the offense through one scorer.

The team also committed only nine turnovers. That gave Philadelphia fewer opportunities to turn defensive pressure into transition offense.

James Harden Leads Cleveland With 21 Points

James Harden was Cleveland’s leading scorer with 21 points.

He shot 6-of-11 from the field, including 3-of-8 from three-point range, and made all six of his free throw attempts. He also recorded five rebounds, five assists, one steal, and one block. His plus/minus was +16.

Harden’s 21 points were important, but his overall contribution was more significant than the scoring total suggests.

His five assists helped Cleveland maintain offensive flow, while his five rebounds added value outside the traditional scoring role. The combination of efficient shooting, playmaking, and rebounding made Harden one of the central reasons Cleveland maintained control.

His three made three-pointers were also tied to Cleveland’s broader perimeter advantage. Philadelphia could not match the Cavaliers’ combination of volume and efficiency from long range.

Keon Ellis Provides a Major Scoring Boost

Keon Ellis quietly produced one of the most efficient offensive performances for Cleveland.

Ellis scored 19 points in 25:35 of playing time. He shot 5-of-9 from the field, made 4-of-7 three-point attempts, and converted 5-of-7 free throws.

His +25 plus/minus was the best mark of any player in the game.

That statistic should not be treated as a standalone measure of individual quality, but in this matchup it supports the larger picture. Cleveland’s strongest stretches often featured contributions from players beyond its primary stars.

Ellis’ four three-pointers were especially valuable because they prevented Philadelphia from concentrating entirely on Cleveland’s leading scorers.

Donovan Mitchell Controls the Offense

Donovan Mitchell finished with 17 points and a game-high six assists.

He shot 4-of-11 from the field but was perfect from the free throw line, converting all nine attempts. He also grabbed three rebounds and recorded two steals.

Mitchell’s 6-for-6 free throw shooting was not just a minor statistical detail. Cleveland finished 23-of-25 from the stripe as a team, while Philadelphia managed only 12-of-18.

That six-point difference at the free throw line was part of a larger efficiency gap.

Mitchell also had the best assist total in the game. His six assists demonstrate how Cleveland’s offense was being organized through multiple playmaking options rather than depending exclusively on Harden.

Dean Wade Dominates the Glass

Dean Wade produced one of Cleveland’s most useful all-around performances.

He finished with 13 points and a game-high 10 rebounds, including four offensive rebounds and six defensive rebounds.

Wade also made three of his six three-point attempts.

His offensive rebounding was particularly useful because second possessions can change the rhythm of a game. Cleveland did not dominate second-chance points, but its ability to generate extra possessions helped maintain pressure.

Wade’s 10 rebounds also gave Cleveland another reliable player around the glass alongside Evan Mobley.

Evan Mobley Adds Inside Production

Evan Mobley scored 15 points and collected eight rebounds.

He shot 7-of-12 from the field and added three blocked shots, giving Cleveland a significant defensive presence near the basket.

Mobley’s three blocks were tied for the team high and helped Cleveland finish with eight blocks overall.

His offensive efficiency was one of the cleaner individual shooting performances among Cleveland’s major contributors. He converted 58.3 percent of his field goal attempts while also contributing seven defensive rebounds.

The combination of Mobley’s interior defense and Wade’s rebounding helped Cleveland maintain control of the frontcourt battle.

Cleveland’s Bench Made a Difference

The Cavaliers did not need one player to dominate every category.

Several supporting players provided meaningful production.

Thomas Bryant scored eight points and added five rebounds and one block. Jaylon Tyson scored 11 points and made three of six attempts from three-point range. Dennis Schroder contributed four points and two assists.

The Cleveland bench also benefited from efficient perimeter shooting.

Bryant made two three-pointers, while Tyson also hit three. This gave Philadelphia another problem to solve because Cleveland’s spacing remained effective even when the primary scoring options were not taking every shot.

The depth of the scoring distribution is one of the clearest reasons to view this game as a team victory rather than simply a Harden-Mitchell performance.

Philadelphia 76ers Offensive Performance

Philadelphia finished with 101 points on 39-of-85 shooting.

The 76ers actually shot 45.9 percent from the field, slightly higher than Cleveland’s 45.2 percent.

That makes the final margin more interesting.

If field-goal percentage were the only factor, Philadelphia would have had a much better chance to win. Instead, the 76ers struggled in several other areas.

Philadelphia’s team numbers were:

• 39-of-85 from the field
• 11-of-38 from three-point range
• 12-of-18 from the free throw line
• 42 rebounds
• 20 assists
• 14 turnovers
• 7 steals
• 4 blocks
• 54 points in the paint
• 21 fast-break points
• 13 second-chance points

The 76ers scored more points in the paint and more fast-break points than Cleveland, yet still lost by 14.

That contrast shows how important perimeter efficiency, free throw shooting, ball security, and overall offensive organization were in determining the outcome.

Quentin Grimes Leads Philadelphia With 17 Points

Quentin Grimes was Philadelphia’s leading scorer with 17 points.

He played 36:05 and shot 6-of-13 from the field. He made two of eight three-point attempts and converted all three of his free throws.

Grimes also recorded five rebounds and three assists.

His scoring workload was significant because Philadelphia was missing several major offensive options. Still, the 17 points were not enough to keep pace with Cleveland’s balanced attack.

Grimes finished with a -21 plus/minus, the lowest mark among Philadelphia players who logged significant minutes.

That does not mean every possession involving Grimes was negative. Plus/minus reflects team scoring during a player’s time on the floor. In this game, however, the figure accurately reflects the difficulty Philadelphia had during many of the minutes in which Cleveland controlled the matchup.

Justin Edwards Provides Efficient Scoring

Justin Edwards was one of Philadelphia’s most efficient offensive players.

He scored 14 points while shooting 5-of-6 from the field and 3-of-4 from three-point range.

He also made his only free throw attempt.

Edwards added two rebounds, three assists, two steals, and one turnover.

His 83.3 percent field-goal percentage was the highest among Philadelphia’s players with a meaningful number of attempts.

The issue for Philadelphia was not Edwards’ efficiency. The larger problem was that the 76ers did not receive enough similarly efficient scoring from the rest of the rotation.

Cameron Payne Adds Playmaking

Cameron Payne finished with 12 points and four assists.

He shot 4-of-12 from the field and made two three-pointers.

His four assists tied Dalen Terry for Philadelphia’s team high.

Payne’s role was important because Philadelphia needed additional ball handling and creation. However, Cleveland’s defensive pressure and Philadelphia’s 14 turnovers prevented the 76ers from consistently turning possessions into efficient scoring opportunities.

Adem Bona Leads Philadelphia in Rebounding

Adem Bona recorded seven rebounds in 26:04 of playing time.

He finished with eight points and shot 4-of-10 from the field.

Bona’s seven rebounds tied Andre Drummond for the Philadelphia team lead.

His two offensive rebounds helped Philadelphia create extra opportunities, but Cleveland still managed to win the overall rebounding battle only narrowly, 41-42 in Philadelphia’s favor.

That is an important detail.

Philadelphia did not lose because it was crushed on the boards. In fact, the 76ers collected one more rebound. The larger difference came from how efficiently the two teams converted their offensive possessions.

Dalen Terry and MarJon Beauchamp Add Useful Minutes

Dalen Terry scored nine points, grabbed three rebounds, and recorded four assists.

He shot 4-of-7 from the field and made one of four three-point attempts.

MarJon Beauchamp played only 4:35 but made a notable impact during his limited time. He scored eight points on 3-of-4 shooting and made two of his three three-point attempts.

Beauchamp finished with Philadelphia’s best plus/minus at +3.

His performance is a useful reminder that individual efficiency can remain strong even in a team defeat. He made the most of his limited opportunities, although Philadelphia could not sustain that level of perimeter production across the full rotation.

Cleveland Cavaliers vs 76ers Match Player Stats: Full Player Breakdown

The complete statistical picture shows why Cleveland’s balanced attack proved difficult to match.

Cleveland Cavaliers

Player	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	FG	3PT	FT	+/-
James Harden	29:08	21	5	5	6-11	3-8	6-6	+16
Keon Ellis	25:35	19	2	0	5-9	4-7	5-7	+25
Donovan Mitchell	31:10	17	3	6	4-11	0-2	9-9	+10
Evan Mobley	28:07	15	8	1	7-12	0-2	1-1	+9
Dean Wade	20:13	13	10	2	5-9	3-6	0-0	+16
Jaylon Tyson	20:37	11	1	2	4-11	3-6	0-0	+10
Thomas Bryant	12:34	8	5	1	3-9	2-5	0-0	+6
Dennis Schroder	21:43	4	1	2	1-2	0-1	2-2	+5
Tristan Enaruna	3:50	3	1	1	1-2	1-2	0-0	-8
Nae’Qwan Tomlin	3:50	2	0	0	1-1	0-0	0-0	-8
Sam Merrill	20:35	2	3	5	1-6	0-5	0-0	+5
Craig Porter Jr.	14:58	0	2	3	0-1	0-0	0-0	0
Riley Minix	3:50	0	0	0	0-0	0-0	0-0	-8
Larry Nance Jr.	3:50	0	0	0	0-0	0-0	0-0	-8

Philadelphia 76ers

Player	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	FG	3PT	FT	+/-
Quentin Grimes	36:05	17	5	3	6-13	2-8	3-3	-21
Justin Edwards	28:14	14	2	3	5-6	3-4	1-1	-2
Cameron Payne	27:35	12	6	4	4-12	2-7	2-2	-14
Dalen Terry	19:09	9	3	4	4-7	1-4	0-1	+3
Dominick Barlow	19:35	8	1	0	4-7	0-1	0-2	-10
Adem Bona	26:04	8	7	0	4-10	0-0	0-0	-13
MarJon Beauchamp	4:35	8	0	0	3-4	2-3	0-0	+3
Trendon Watford	20:06	6	5	2	3-8	0-3	0-0	-5
Kelly Oubre Jr.	13:53	6	2	1	1-6	0-3	4-5	-8
Jabari Walker	12:11	5	2	0	2-3	1-1	0-0	+5
Andre Drummond	15:22	4	7	2	1-3	0-1	2-2	-5
Tyrese Martin	17:11	4	2	1	2-6	0-3	0-2	-3

These individual numbers come from the official scorer’s report. Philadelphia’s team totals were 39-of-85 from the field, 11-of-38 from three, and 12-of-18 at the line, while Cleveland finished 38-of-84, 16-of-44, and 23-of-25 respectively.

The Three-Point Battle Was Crucial

One of the clearest statistical differences was three-point production.

Philadelphia made 11 three-pointers.

Cleveland made 16.

That is a five-three difference.

Cleveland also attempted six more threes, taking 44 attempts compared with Philadelphia’s 38. More importantly, Cleveland converted 36.4 percent of its attempts while Philadelphia made only 28.9 percent.

The Cavaliers therefore gained 15 points from the difference in made three-pointers alone.

That perimeter gap helped offset Philadelphia’s slight advantage in overall field-goal percentage.

Free Throw Shooting Created Another Advantage

Cleveland’s 23-of-25 free throw shooting was another major factor.

Philadelphia went 12-of-18.

Cleveland therefore made 11 more free throws.

The Cavaliers converted at a remarkable 92 percent rate, while Philadelphia finished at 66.7 percent.

Donovan Mitchell was perfect at 9-of-9, while James Harden went 6-of-6.

This is one of the easiest areas to overlook when examining a traditional box score. Cleveland did not merely get to the line more often. It converted those opportunities at a far higher rate.

Turnovers Favored Cleveland

Philadelphia committed 14 turnovers in the basic team comparison provided in the game statistics, while Cleveland committed nine.

The official scorer’s report also records team turnover totals that reflect the broader scoring-accounting format, including team possessions.

The practical takeaway is straightforward: Cleveland protected the ball better.

Five fewer turnovers gave the Cavaliers additional control over the possession battle.

Against a team already struggling to match Cleveland’s three-point production, losing possessions made Philadelphia’s comeback even more difficult.

Philadelphia Won Some Statistical Categories

The final score should not create the impression that Cleveland dominated every category.

Philadelphia actually held several advantages.

The 76ers scored 54 points in the paint compared with Cleveland’s 40. They also produced 21 fast-break points against Cleveland’s 13 and collected 42 rebounds compared with Cleveland’s 41.

These numbers show that Philadelphia had legitimate offensive success.

The problem was that those advantages did not compensate for Cleveland’s perimeter shooting, free throw efficiency, assists, and ball security.

That is an important lesson when interpreting basketball statistics. A team can win several traditional categories and still lose comfortably if its opponent dominates the highest-value areas.

Why Cleveland Won the Game

The Cleveland Cavaliers vs 76ers match player stats point to several interconnected reasons for the final result.

1. Cleveland shot better from three

The Cavaliers made 16 threes at a 36.4 percent rate.

Philadelphia made 11 at 28.9 percent.

That was a major scoring advantage.

2. Cleveland converted free throws at an elite rate

Cleveland made 23 of 25 free throws.

Philadelphia made 12 of 18.

The difference was substantial.

3. Cleveland created more assists

The Cavaliers finished with 28 assists compared with Philadelphia’s 20.

That eight-assist advantage reflects stronger ball movement and more shared offensive creation.

4. Cleveland protected the basketball better

The Cavaliers committed nine turnovers compared with Philadelphia’s 14 in the team statistics.

Fewer empty possessions helped Cleveland sustain its lead.

5. Cleveland received balanced scoring

Harden led with 21, Ellis scored 19, Mitchell scored 17, Mobley scored 15, Wade scored 13, and Tyson added 11.

That gave Philadelphia multiple scoring problems.

The Impact of Philadelphia’s Missing Players

Context is important when interpreting the final result.

The official scorer’s report lists Joel Embiid, Tyrese Maxey, Paul George, and VJ Edgecombe among Philadelphia’s inactive players for the game.

That significantly affected Philadelphia’s available offensive options.

The 76ers therefore relied heavily on players who had to take on expanded roles.

Quentin Grimes led the team with 17 points, while Justin Edwards and Cameron Payne also had important scoring responsibilities.

This context does not diminish Cleveland’s win. The Cavaliers still had to execute, and they did so effectively. But it does help explain why Philadelphia’s offense lacked the same level of top-end shot creation that it might have had with its unavailable players.

The Importance of the Third Quarter

The third quarter was arguably the decisive period.

Cleveland entered halftime with a 56-44 advantage.

Instead of allowing Philadelphia to immediately cut into that lead, the Cavaliers added another nine points to the margin during the third period.

Cleveland scored 31 points in the third quarter while Philadelphia managed 22.

The resulting 87-66 score after three quarters effectively put the game out of reach.

Philadelphia responded with 35 points in the fourth, but Cleveland’s 28 points were enough to protect the lead.

The game therefore demonstrates the importance of responding to an opponent’s adjustment. Cleveland did not allow Philadelphia’s halftime deficit to become a comeback opportunity.

Season Series: Cleveland Sweeps Philadelphia

The fourth meeting of the season completed a 4-0 Cleveland sweep.

The results were:

Game	Result
November 6	Cavaliers 132, 76ers 121
January 15	Cavaliers 133, 76ers 107
January 17	Cavaliers 117, 76ers 115
March 9	Cavaliers 115, 76ers 101

The season series shows consistency from Cleveland.

The Cavaliers won by 11 in the first meeting, 26 in the second, two in the third, and 14 in the fourth.

The narrow January 17 game demonstrated that Philadelphia could challenge Cleveland in a close contest, but the Cavaliers ultimately won all four matchups.

What the Matchup Reveals About Both Teams

The game offered useful information beyond the final score.

For Cleveland, the biggest positive was offensive balance. The team could generate production from Harden and Mitchell while also receiving significant contributions from Ellis, Mobley, Wade, and Tyson.

Cleveland’s ability to combine three-point volume with efficient free throw shooting gave it a strong scoring foundation.

For Philadelphia, the most encouraging element was its ability to attack inside and generate transition opportunities. The 76ers scored 54 points in the paint and 21 fast-break points.

The challenge was maintaining enough perimeter efficiency and avoiding empty possessions.

When Philadelphia shot 28.9 percent from three and committed 14 turnovers, it became difficult to overcome Cleveland’s offensive efficiency.

What Fans Should Take From the Player Stats

Looking only at the top scorer can miss the bigger story.

James Harden’s 21 points led Cleveland, but Keon Ellis’ 19 points and +25 plus/minus were equally revealing.

Donovan Mitchell’s 17 points came with six assists and perfect free throw shooting.

Dean Wade’s 10 rebounds addressed an important area of need.

Evan Mobley’s 15 points, eight rebounds, and three blocks provided two-way value.

For Philadelphia, Quentin Grimes’ 17 points led the team, but Justin Edwards’ 14 points on 5-of-6 shooting were arguably the most efficient offensive contribution.

Dalen Terry also produced nine points and four assists, while MarJon Beauchamp scored eight points in limited minutes.

The overall lesson is that player evaluation requires more than looking at the scoring column.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the final score between the Cavaliers and 76ers?

The Cleveland Cavaliers defeated the Philadelphia 76ers 115-101 at Rocket Arena on March 9, 2026.

Who led the Cavaliers in scoring?

James Harden led Cleveland with 21 points. He also recorded five rebounds and five assists while shooting 6-of-11 from the field and 6-of-6 from the free throw line.

Who led the 76ers in scoring?

Quentin Grimes led Philadelphia with 17 points. He also recorded five rebounds and three assists.

Who had the most rebounds in the game?

Cleveland’s Dean Wade led all players with 10 rebounds. He finished with four offensive rebounds and six defensive rebounds.

Who had the most assists?

Donovan Mitchell led all players with six assists for Cleveland.

Did Cleveland win the season series?

Yes. Cleveland swept Philadelphia 4-0 during the 2025-26 regular season, winning all four meetings.

Conclusion

The Cleveland Cavaliers vs 76ers match player stats show a Cleveland team that won through balanced production and efficient execution rather than relying on a single superstar performance.

James Harden’s 21 points led the Cavaliers, while Keon Ellis supplied 19 points and the game’s best plus/minus at +25. Donovan Mitchell added 17 points and six assists, Dean Wade controlled the glass with 10 rebounds, and Evan Mobley contributed 15 points, eight rebounds, and three blocks.

Philadelphia received 17 points from Quentin Grimes, 14 from Justin Edwards, and 12 from Cameron Payne. The 76ers also won the rebounding battle and produced more points in the paint and on the fast break.

The decisive differences came elsewhere. Cleveland made 16 three-pointers compared with Philadelphia’s 11, converted 23 of 25 free throws, recorded 28 assists, and committed fewer turnovers. Those advantages allowed the Cavaliers to turn a six-point first-quarter lead into a 21-point advantage entering the fourth.

The victory also completed Cleveland’s 4-0 sweep of Philadelphia during the regular season. From a statistical perspective, the matchup was a strong example of how three-point efficiency, free throw execution, ball movement, and possession management can outweigh a modest field-goal percentage advantage.