Celtics vs San Antonio Spurs Match Player Stats
The celtics vs san antonio spurs match player stats from January 11, 2026, tell the story of a closely contested game that San Antonio won 100-95 at TD Garden. Boston led after the opening two quarters, but the Spurs changed the momentum after halftime and held the Celtics to just 20 points in each of the final two quarters.
The result was not simply about one player having a big scoring night. San Antonio received balanced production from De’Aaron Fox, Jeremy Sochan, Keldon Johnson, and Julian Champagnie, while Boston relied heavily on Derrick White and Jaylen Brown. The five-point margin also reflects how little separated the teams statistically. Boston actually shot slightly better overall and made considerably more three-pointers, but San Antonio’s rebounding, lower turnover count, and stronger second-half execution helped decide the game.
This breakdown examines the individual performances, team numbers, quarter-by-quarter flow, and the statistical details that explain why the Spurs left Boston with the win.
Celtics vs San Antonio Spurs Match Player Stats: Game Overview
The game was played on January 11, 2026, at TD Garden in Boston, Massachusetts, in front of 19,156 fans.
San Antonio entered the matchup with a 27-11 record, including a strong 14-6 mark on the road. Boston came in at 24-14 and had a 12-7 record at home.
Despite those records, the game was extremely competitive.
| Category | Spurs | Celtics |
| Final Score | 100 | 95 |
| Field Goals | 38-95 | 38-93 |
| FG Percentage | 40% | 41% |
| Three-Pointers | 10-44 | 16-44 |
| Three-Point Percentage | 23% | 36% |
| Free Throws | 14-20 | 3-4 |
| Rebounds | 53 | 52 |
| Assists | 22 | 22 |
| Turnovers | 8 | 10 |
| Steals | 5 | 5 |
| Blocks | 4 | 5 |
The numbers show why this was a five-point game.
Boston had the better three-point percentage and converted six more three-pointers. The Celtics also had a slightly better overall field-goal percentage. However, San Antonio finished with one more rebound and two fewer turnovers.
Those small advantages became meaningful in a game where neither team was particularly efficient from the field.
How the Game Developed
The Celtics opened the game strongly, scoring 26 points in the first quarter while limiting San Antonio to 21.
The second quarter was more balanced. San Antonio scored 29 points, but Boston also produced 29. That left the Celtics ahead at halftime.
The quarter scores were:
| Quarter | Spurs | Celtics |
| 1st | 21 | 26 |
| 2nd | 29 | 29 |
| 3rd | 23 | 20 |
| 4th | 27 | 20 |
| Final | 100 | 95 |
The turning point was the second half.
San Antonio outscored Boston 50-40 over the final two quarters. More importantly, the Celtics scored only 40 combined points after halftime.
That second-half scoring decline explains much of the final result.
Boston had opportunities to maintain its lead, but San Antonio consistently prevented the Celtics from creating enough offensive separation. The Spurs did not need an explosive shooting performance. They simply needed to remain competitive while taking advantage of Boston’s reduced offensive output.
Spurs Player Performance
De’Aaron Fox Leads San Antonio
De’Aaron Fox finished as one of San Antonio’s most important offensive contributors with 21 points and 6 assists.
His six assists were also the team high, giving him an important role beyond scoring. Against a Boston team that recorded five steals and five blocks, Fox’s ability to contribute as a facilitator was particularly valuable.
His 21 points tied Jeremy Sochan for the Spurs’ scoring lead.
Fox’s performance is important when examining the celtics vs san antonio spurs match player stats because his contribution was not limited to the scoring column. His six assists represented a substantial portion of San Antonio’s 22 total assists.
Jeremy Sochan Provides Major Bench Production
Jeremy Sochan scored 21 points and was the Spurs’ plus/minus leader at +15.
That combination makes his performance particularly notable.
Scoring 21 points is already significant, but the +15 figure indicates that San Antonio performed especially well during his minutes on the floor.
Sochan was also part of the balanced offensive attack that prevented Boston from focusing exclusively on Fox.
Keldon Johnson Adds 18 Points
Keldon Johnson finished with 18 points.
His scoring gave San Antonio another reliable option alongside Fox and Sochan. The Spurs had four players reach double figures in the supplied game data, which helped distribute Boston’s defensive attention.
Johnson’s 18 points were the third-highest scoring total on the team.
Julian Champagnie Controls the Glass
Julian Champagnie scored 12 points and collected a team-high 13 rebounds.
His rebounding performance was one of the most important statistical contributions of the night.
San Antonio finished with 53 total rebounds compared with Boston’s 52. That one-rebound difference may appear insignificant, but in a five-point game, every additional possession matters.
Champagnie’s 13 rebounds were also equal to the Celtics’ top individual rebounding total from Neemias Queta.
Spurs Starting Lineup
San Antonio’s starting five consisted of:
- Harrison Barnes
- Julian Champagnie
- Luke Kornet
- De’Aaron Fox
- Stephon Castle
The Spurs also received important scoring support from their bench.
Jeremy Sochan scored 21 points, while Keldon Johnson added 18. Kelly Olynyk contributed 3 points.
That distribution helped San Antonio avoid becoming overly dependent on its starting lineup.
Celtics Player Performance
Derrick White Leads All Scorers
Derrick White was the game’s leading scorer with 29 points.
He shot:
- 11-for-26 from the field
- 5-for-17 from three-point range
- 2-for-2 from the free-throw line
White’s 29 points represented the largest individual scoring performance from either team.
He also carried a significant offensive workload, attempting 26 field goals and 17 three-pointers.
His five made three-pointers were particularly important because Boston finished 16-for-44 from beyond the arc as a team.
Despite White’s strong scoring output, Boston’s overall offensive production declined during the second half.
Jaylen Brown Produces 27 Points
Jaylen Brown was close behind White with 27 points.
He shot 11-for-28 from the field and 5-for-11 from three-point range.
Brown also led Boston with 7 assists.
That combination of scoring and playmaking made him one of the Celtics’ most complete contributors in the matchup.
Brown’s seven assists were five more than the Spurs’ individual second-highest assist total listed in the supplied data, although Fox still led the game with six assists for San Antonio.
Neemias Queta Wins the Individual Rebounding Battle
Neemias Queta collected 13 rebounds, tying Champagnie for the highest individual rebound total in the game.
Boston finished with 52 rebounds overall, only one behind San Antonio.
Queta’s work on the boards helped Boston remain competitive despite its offensive struggles in the second half.
Celtics Bench Contributions
Boston’s bench also contributed:
- Luka Garza: 11 points
- Baylor Scheierman: 10 points
- Anfernee Simons: 5 points
Baylor Scheierman finished as Boston’s plus/minus leader at +4.
That is an interesting detail because Boston lost the game by five points, yet Scheierman posted the team’s best plus/minus figure.
Shooting Comparison
One of the most interesting aspects of the celtics vs san antonio spurs match player stats is that Boston actually shot slightly better overall.
The Celtics made 38 of 93 field-goal attempts, producing a 41% shooting rate.
San Antonio made 38 of 95 attempts, producing a 40% rate.
That difference is small, but Boston’s advantage becomes much clearer from three-point range.
Three-Point Shooting
Boston:
16-for-44, 36%
San Antonio:
10-for-44, 23%
The Celtics made six more three-pointers.
That is a substantial advantage.
However, the Spurs still won because shooting efficiency was only one part of the game. San Antonio compensated through its overall possession management and second-half performance.
The Spurs committed only eight turnovers compared with Boston’s ten.
In a close game, two additional turnovers can create extra opportunities for the opposition and remove scoring chances from your own offense.
Free Throws
The free-throw numbers were unusual.
San Antonio went 14-for-20.
Boston went only 3-for-4.
That gave the Spurs 16 more free-throw attempts.
Even though San Antonio shot only 70% from the line, the extra opportunities helped offset Boston’s three-point advantage.
This is one of the clearest examples of why simply comparing three-point percentages does not fully explain a basketball result.
Rebounding Battle
San Antonio won the overall rebounding battle 53-52.
That was extremely close.
Julian Champagnie and Neemias Queta both recorded 13 rebounds individually.
The near-even team totals suggest that neither side dominated the glass. Instead, the rebounding battle contributed to the game’s overall balance.
For San Antonio, the extra rebound was still useful because the game was decided by only five points.
Turnovers and Ball Security
San Antonio committed 8 turnovers.
Boston committed 10.
The two-turnover difference may not look dramatic, but it is meaningful in a game where both teams finished below 50% from the field.
When shooting efficiency is limited, preserving possessions becomes even more important.
San Antonio also finished with 22 assists, matching Boston’s 22.
That means the Spurs did not sacrifice ball movement to achieve their lower turnover total.
Their combination of 22 assists and only eight turnovers produced a strong assist-to-turnover profile.
Boston also recorded 22 assists, but its ten turnovers gave it a slightly less efficient possession-management performance.
The Second-Half Difference
The most important section of this game is arguably not an individual player’s box-score line.
It is the second half.
Boston scored:
20 points in the third quarter
20 points in the fourth quarter
San Antonio scored:
23 points in the third quarter
27 points in the fourth quarter
That means San Antonio outscored Boston 50-40 after halftime.
The Spurs did not need to dominate every statistical category. They simply needed to win the second half by enough to erase Boston’s early advantage.
That is exactly what happened.
Why San Antonio Won
Several factors stand out when the complete celtics vs san antonio spurs match player stats are considered together.
1. San Antonio Finished Strong
The Spurs entered halftime trailing but produced 27 points in the fourth quarter.
Boston could manage only 20.
That seven-point fourth-quarter advantage effectively secured the game.
2. The Spurs Got Balanced Scoring
Fox and Sochan each scored 21.
Johnson added 18.
Champagnie added 12.
That gave San Antonio four players with meaningful offensive production.
Boston’s offense was more concentrated around White and Brown, who combined for 56 points.
3. San Antonio Protected the Ball
Eight turnovers compared with Boston’s ten gave the Spurs a small but useful possession advantage.
4. Free-Throw Attempts Favored San Antonio
The Spurs attempted 20 free throws.
Boston attempted only four.
That difference helped counter Boston’s advantage from three-point range.
5. San Antonio Won the Rebounding Battle
The Spurs finished with 53 rebounds to Boston’s 52.
It was not a dominant rebounding performance, but it was another small statistical edge in a close game.
Why Boston Lost Despite Better Three-Point Shooting
This is perhaps the most useful lesson from the game.
Boston made 16 three-pointers.
San Antonio made only 10.
The Celtics also had a slightly better field-goal percentage.
Yet Boston lost.
Why?
Because basketball results are determined by the total possession equation, not one shooting category.
Boston had:
- Better three-point percentage
- More made three-pointers
- Slightly better overall field-goal percentage
- One fewer rebound
- Two more turnovers
- Far fewer free-throw attempts
The free-throw difference was especially significant.
Boston made only three free throws all night.
San Antonio made 14.
That 11-point difference in made free throws is larger than the final five-point margin.
Starting Lineups and Rotation Contributions
San Antonio opened with Harrison Barnes, Julian Champagnie, Luke Kornet, De’Aaron Fox, and Stephon Castle.
Boston started Neemias Queta, Derrick White, Jaylen Brown, Payton Pritchard, and Hugo Gonzalez.
The game therefore featured contrasting offensive approaches.
Boston’s primary scoring burden fell heavily on White and Brown. White scored 29, while Brown scored 27.
San Antonio distributed its scoring more evenly among multiple contributors.
This does not automatically mean balanced scoring is always better. But in this particular matchup, it helped San Antonio maintain offensive stability while Boston’s scoring slowed in the second half.
Plus/Minus Leaders
Jeremy Sochan led all Spurs players in plus/minus at +15.
For Boston, Baylor Scheierman led the team at +4.
These figures provide another useful perspective.
Sochan’s +15 suggests that San Antonio had its strongest stretches while he was on the court. His 21 points reinforce the importance of his overall impact.
Scheierman’s +4 was Boston’s best mark even though the Celtics ultimately lost.
Plus/minus should not be used alone to judge a player, but when combined with scoring and the game flow, it can help identify which players were on the floor during successful stretches.
Key Statistical Takeaways
The most important numbers from this matchup can be summarized as follows:
| Statistic | Key Result |
| Final score | Spurs 100, Celtics 95 |
| Margin | Spurs by 5 |
| Leading scorer | Derrick White, 29 |
| Spurs leading scorers | De’Aaron Fox and Jeremy Sochan, 21 each |
| Celtics second scorer | Jaylen Brown, 27 |
| Top rebounders | Julian Champagnie and Neemias Queta, 13 each |
| Top assists | De’Aaron Fox, 6; Jaylen Brown, 7 |
| Spurs rebounds | 53 |
| Celtics rebounds | 52 |
| Spurs turnovers | 8 |
| Celtics turnovers | 10 |
| Spurs three-point shooting | 23% |
| Celtics three-point shooting | 36% |
| Spurs free throws made | 14 |
| Celtics free throws made | 3 |
| Second-half score | Spurs 50, Celtics 40 |
What the Player Stats Tell Us
Looking only at the final score can make this matchup appear like a routine five-point road win.
The detailed numbers show something different.
It was a game of small margins.
Boston had the stronger three-point shooting performance. Derrick White and Jaylen Brown combined for 56 points. The Celtics also finished with a slightly better field-goal percentage.
San Antonio still found a way to win.
The Spurs’ biggest advantages came from free throws, turnover control, and second-half scoring.
That combination demonstrates why a box score should be read as a connected story rather than a list of isolated numbers.
A player can score 29 points and still be on the losing side. A team can shoot only 23% from three and still win. A five-point result can emerge from several small statistical advantages rather than one overwhelming category.
Season Series Context
This result gave San Antonio a 1-0 lead in the season series.
The significance of that number depends on how future meetings develop, but the opening result clearly favored the Spurs.
San Antonio also improved on an already strong season record to 27-11, while Boston moved to 24-14 after the loss.
The Spurs’ 14-6 road record was particularly notable because the victory came at Boston’s TD Garden.
A Closer Look at Derrick White’s Night
White’s 29 points were the highest individual total in the game.
His shooting line of 11-for-26 from the field translates to a demanding offensive workload. He attempted 17 three-pointers, making five.
That means his three-point attempts represented a large portion of his total field-goal attempts.
The efficiency was mixed.
Making five three-pointers helped Boston create offensive value from outside, but the 5-for-17 long-range shooting also shows how difficult the volume shooting became.
White’s performance was productive enough to lead all scorers, but Boston needed more offensive production during the second half.
A Closer Look at Jaylen Brown’s Night
Brown scored 27 points on 11-for-28 shooting.
He was also 5-for-11 from three-point range.
Unlike a pure scoring role, Brown contributed seven assists, giving him an important playmaking responsibility.
His 27 points and seven assists show that Boston was asking him to influence the game in multiple ways.
Still, the Celtics were held to 20 points in both second-half quarters.
That suggests the problem was not simply the lack of an individual scorer. Boston needed sustained team offense after halftime.
A Closer Look at San Antonio’s Balance
San Antonio’s offense had a different shape.
Fox and Sochan each scored 21, Johnson added 18, and Champagnie scored 12.
That means the Spurs had four players producing double-digit scoring totals.
Fox also supplied six assists.
Champagnie contributed 13 rebounds.
Sochan posted a +15 plus/minus.
Together, these numbers demonstrate a balanced team performance rather than a one-player takeover.
What to Watch in Similar Matchups
When evaluating future Celtics and Spurs games, several statistical indicators can provide useful context.
Watch the Three-Point Volume
Boston’s ability to generate three-point attempts can dramatically influence its offensive ceiling.
In this matchup, the Celtics made 16 threes, yet still lost.
That illustrates that high-volume perimeter production does not guarantee victory when other possession factors move in the opposite direction.
Watch Free-Throw Attempts
The difference between 20 Spurs attempts and four Celtics attempts was one of the most striking statistical features of the game.
Future matchups should be evaluated partly through how often each team reaches the free-throw line.
Watch Turnovers
San Antonio’s eight turnovers were fewer than Boston’s ten.
That margin was small but meaningful.
Watch Second-Half Offense
The Spurs scored 50 points after halftime.
Boston scored 40.
For this matchup, second-half offensive consistency was arguably more important than the raw shooting percentages.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the final score between the Spurs and Celtics?
The San Antonio Spurs defeated the Boston Celtics 100-95 on January 11, 2026, at TD Garden.
Who was the leading scorer in the Spurs vs Celtics game?
Derrick White led all players with 29 points for Boston. De’Aaron Fox and Jeremy Sochan led San Antonio with 21 points each.
Who had the most rebounds in the game?
Julian Champagnie and Neemias Queta each recorded 13 rebounds, which was the highest individual rebounding total in the matchup.
Who led the game in assists?
Jaylen Brown led all players with seven assists. De’Aaron Fox had six assists for San Antonio.
Why did the Spurs beat the Celtics?
San Antonio won because it overcame Boston’s three-point shooting advantage through stronger second-half scoring, fewer turnovers, more made free throws, and a narrow rebounding edge.
What was the Celtics’ three-point shooting percentage?
Boston shot 16-for-44 from three-point range, which was 36%. San Antonio shot 10-for-44, or 23%.
Conclusion
The celtics vs san antonio spurs match player stats from January 11, 2026, show a game that was decided by execution rather than one overwhelming statistical advantage.
Derrick White led everyone with 29 points, while Jaylen Brown added 27 points and seven assists. For San Antonio, De’Aaron Fox and Jeremy Sochan each scored 21, Keldon Johnson added 18, and Julian Champagnie recorded 13 rebounds.
Boston had the clear edge from three-point range, making 16 compared with San Antonio’s 10. However, the Spurs compensated through a 14-3 advantage in made free throws, an 8-10 turnover advantage, a 53-52 rebounding edge, and a decisive 50-40 advantage in second-half scoring.
The result was a 100-95 San Antonio victory and a 1-0 season-series lead.
The deeper lesson from the box score is that close NBA games are often determined by several small advantages working together. In this case, San Antonio’s ability to protect possessions, create free-throw opportunities, and finish the game stronger outweighed Boston’s superior perimeter shooting.
