San Antonio Spurs vs Memphis Grizzlies Match Player Stats
The san antonio spurs vs memphis grizzlies match player stats from November 19, 2025, tell the story of a game where efficiency, discipline, and timely scoring helped San Antonio secure a convincing 111 to 101 victory over Memphis. Played at Frost Bank Center in front of 18,354 fans, the matchup showcased standout performances from De’Aaron Fox, Harrison Barnes, Keldon Johnson, Cedric Coward, and Jaren Jackson Jr.
For basketball fans, analysts, fantasy players, and NBA followers, understanding the numbers behind this contest provides deeper insight than the final score alone. While Memphis controlled the rebounding battle and generated more assists, San Antonio’s superior shooting efficiency, perimeter scoring, and ball security ultimately made the difference.
This detailed breakdown examines every important aspect of the game, including team performance, individual player statistics, tactical observations, turning points, and what the result revealed about both franchises during the 2025–26 NBA season.
Match Overview
The game took place on November 19, 2025, as part of the NBA regular season schedule. San Antonio entered the contest with a strong 10–4 record and an impressive home mark of 7–2. Memphis arrived struggling at 4–11 and had won just one of seven road games.
Game Information
| Category | Details |
| Competition | NBA 2025–26 Regular Season |
| Date | November 19, 2025 |
| Venue | Frost Bank Center, San Antonio |
| Attendance | 18,354 |
| Final Score | Spurs 111, Grizzlies 101 |
| Winning Team | San Antonio Spurs |
| Season Series | Spurs led 1–0 |
The result reinforced San Antonio’s position as one of the stronger teams in the Western Conference while highlighting the challenges Memphis faced throughout the season.
San Antonio Spurs vs Memphis Grizzlies Match Player Stats: Complete Box Score Analysis
When examining the san antonio spurs vs memphis grizzlies match player stats, one trend becomes immediately clear. San Antonio made far better use of its possessions.
Despite Memphis attempting significantly more shots, the Spurs converted opportunities at a much higher rate and committed fewer mistakes.
Team Statistics Comparison
| Statistic | Memphis | San Antonio |
| Points | 101 | 111 |
| Field Goals | 42–104 | 42–87 |
| FG Percentage | 40% | 48% |
| Three Pointers | 12–39 | 16–42 |
| Three Point Percentage | 31% | 38% |
| Free Throws | 5–9 | 11–13 |
| Free Throw Percentage | 56% | 85% |
| Rebounds | 59 | 38 |
| Assists | 30 | 23 |
| Turnovers | 14 | 9 |
| Steals | 6 | 10 |
| Blocks | 4 | 3 |
Key Takeaways
Several statistics explain why San Antonio emerged victorious:
- Shot nearly 50 percent from the field.
- Made four more three pointers.
- Converted free throws at an elite rate.
- Committed five fewer turnovers.
- Recorded ten steals, creating transition opportunities.
Meanwhile, Memphis dominated the glass with a 59 to 38 rebounding advantage but failed to convert enough of those extra possessions into points.
Quarter by Quarter Breakdown
Understanding the flow of the game provides important context behind the numbers.
First Quarter
| Team | Points |
| Memphis | 24 |
| San Antonio | 23 |
The opening period was tightly contested. Memphis edged ahead by one point through aggressive rebounding and second chance opportunities.
Second Quarter
| Team | Points |
| Memphis | 23 |
| San Antonio | 26 |
San Antonio started finding rhythm offensively. Better perimeter shooting allowed the Spurs to enter halftime with a slight lead.
Third Quarter
| Team | Points |
| Memphis | 40 |
| San Antonio | 37 |
The third quarter was the highest scoring stretch of the night. Both teams exchanged baskets at a rapid pace, with Memphis producing its best offensive period.
Fourth Quarter
| Team | Points |
| Memphis | 14 |
| San Antonio | 25 |
This period decided the game.
Memphis struggled dramatically, scoring only 14 points. San Antonio tightened defensively, generated turnovers, and executed efficiently in half court sets. The Spurs outscored the Grizzlies by 11 points in the final quarter to seal the victory.
Spurs Player Statistics and Performance Review
San Antonio received contributions from multiple players, demonstrating the balanced roster construction that made them successful throughout the season.
De’Aaron Fox Leads the Way
De’Aaron Fox delivered a game high 26 points and consistently pressured Memphis defenders.
His performance stood out because he:
- Controlled the pace.
- Attacked the basket effectively.
- Created scoring opportunities in transition.
- Delivered efficient offensive production when the game tightened.
Fox’s ability to score from different areas of the floor forced Memphis to constantly adjust defensively.
Harrison Barnes Continues His Veteran Impact
Barnes added 23 points and served as a reliable secondary scorer.
Veteran players often influence games beyond the box score, and Barnes provided:
- Floor spacing.
- Smart shot selection.
- Leadership during critical stretches.
- Consistent scoring efficiency.
His offensive contribution prevented Memphis from focusing exclusively on Fox.
Keldon Johnson Sparks the Bench
One of the most important performances came from Keldon Johnson.
Statistics:
- 18 points
- Team high 7 rebounds
Johnson’s energy off the bench changed several momentum swings. His rebounding was particularly valuable considering Memphis dominated overall team rebounds.
Devin Vassell’s All Around Contribution
Vassell contributed in multiple areas and finished as one of the team’s assist leaders.
His role included:
- Secondary playmaking.
- Perimeter defense.
- Floor spacing.
- Ball movement.
These contributions often go unnoticed but significantly impact winning basketball.
Kelly Olynyk’s Playmaking Value
Although not among the leading scorers, Olynyk helped facilitate offensive flow and contributed valuable assists.
His basketball IQ allowed San Antonio to maintain structure whenever Memphis attempted defensive adjustments.
Memphis Grizzlies Player Statistics and Performance Review
Although Memphis lost by ten points, several players delivered encouraging individual performances.
Cedric Coward Emerges as Leading Scorer
Cedric Coward recorded:
- 19 points
- 11 rebounds
This double double performance highlighted his ability to impact both scoring and rebounding.
Coward’s effort kept Memphis competitive for much of the evening and demonstrated his value as a versatile contributor.
Jaren Jackson Jr. Provides Offensive Production
Jackson finished with:
- 18 points
- 6 rebounds
As one of Memphis’ most important players, Jackson carried significant offensive responsibility.
His ability to stretch defenses and score from multiple spots remained evident despite the defeat.
Zach Edey’s Rebounding Presence
Edey grabbed 11 rebounds, matching Coward for the team lead.
His size created challenges for San Antonio throughout the game and contributed heavily to Memphis’ overall rebounding dominance.
Vince Williams Jr. Controls Distribution
Williams recorded 9 assists, leading all Memphis players.
His passing helped Memphis reach 30 team assists, demonstrating effective ball movement despite inconsistent shooting.
Cam Spencer Delivers Bench Scoring
Spencer contributed 15 points off the bench.
Bench production often determines the outcome of close NBA games, and Spencer provided valuable scoring whenever Memphis needed offensive support.
Starting Lineup Performance Comparison
San Antonio Starting Five
- Harrison Barnes
- Julian Champagnie
- Luke Kornet
- De’Aaron Fox
- Devin Vassell
The starting group displayed strong balance between scoring, shooting, and defensive activity.
Memphis Starting Five
- Jaren Jackson Jr.
- Cedric Coward
- Jaylen Wells
- Zach Edey
- Vince Williams Jr.
This lineup offered size and rebounding strength but struggled to match San Antonio’s shooting efficiency.
Why San Antonio Won the Game
Several factors explain the outcome beyond individual scoring totals.
Superior Shooting Efficiency
The Spurs shot 48 percent from the field compared to Memphis’ 40 percent.
In modern NBA basketball, efficient shooting remains one of the strongest predictors of victory.
Better Three Point Production
San Antonio made:
- 16 three pointers
- 38 percent accuracy
Memphis managed:
- 12 three pointers
- 31 percent accuracy
The additional perimeter scoring created a meaningful advantage.
Turnover Control
The Spurs committed only nine turnovers.
Memphis committed fourteen.
Those five extra possessions translated into valuable scoring opportunities.
Free Throw Excellence
San Antonio converted 85 percent of free throws.
Memphis made only 56 percent.
Even though free throw attempts were limited, the efficiency gap contributed directly to the final margin.
Tactical Analysis and Basketball Insights
From an analytical perspective, this matchup serves as an excellent example of efficiency outweighing volume.
Memphis attempted 104 field goals compared with San Antonio’s 87.
At first glance, that seems advantageous for the Grizzlies.
However, basketball games are not won by taking more shots. They are won by converting opportunities efficiently.
The Spurs demonstrated this principle perfectly.
Key observations include:
- Higher shooting percentages.
- Better perimeter accuracy.
- Fewer turnovers.
- More defensive steals.
- Strong fourth quarter execution.
These characteristics are typically associated with successful playoff caliber teams.
What This Game Revealed About the Spurs
The victory reflected several strengths that defined San Antonio during the season.
Balanced Scoring
Three different players scored at least 18 points.
Balanced offenses are generally more difficult to defend because opponents cannot focus on a single scorer.
Veteran Leadership
Players such as Harrison Barnes provided composure during critical moments.
Defensive Activity
Ten steals indicate active hands and disciplined defensive positioning.
Winning Habits
The Spurs demonstrated the ability to close games effectively, particularly in the fourth quarter.
These qualities contributed to their outstanding 62–20 season record.
What This Game Revealed About the Grizzlies
Although the loss was disappointing, Memphis displayed positive elements.
Strong Rebounding
Collecting 59 rebounds shows commitment and physicality.
Ball Movement
Thirty assists indicate an offense capable of creating quality looks.
Young Talent Development
Performances from players such as Cedric Coward suggest potential building blocks for future success.
However, several concerns remained.
Shooting Efficiency Issues
Forty percent shooting placed constant pressure on the offense.
Late Game Execution
Scoring only 14 fourth quarter points made a comeback nearly impossible.
Free Throw Struggles
A 56 percent conversion rate represents a significant weakness at the professional level.
Advanced Statistical Perspective
Modern basketball analysis increasingly emphasizes efficiency metrics.
Using available game data, several trends emerge.
Effective Offensive Approach
San Antonio generated:
- Better points per shot attempt.
- More successful three point outcomes.
- Higher free throw efficiency.
Defensive Impact
The Spurs created:
- More steals.
- Fewer turnovers.
- Better transition opportunities.
Possession Value
Each possession carried greater value for San Antonio because they maximized scoring opportunities while limiting mistakes.
This combination frequently separates winning teams from struggling teams.
Historical Significance Within the Season Series
This contest gave San Antonio a 1–0 lead in the season series.
For divisional opponents, early victories often influence playoff positioning, tiebreakers, and momentum.
Although the teams experienced very different seasons, this matchup illustrated the gap between a contender and a rebuilding roster.
The Spurs eventually finished 62–20, while Memphis ended 25–57.
Those final records align closely with what fans witnessed during this game.
Key Player Stats Summary
Spurs Leaders
| Category | Player | Stat |
| Points | De’Aaron Fox | 26 |
| Second Leading Scorer | Harrison Barnes | 23 |
| Bench Points | Keldon Johnson | 18 |
| Rebounds | Keldon Johnson | 7 |
| Assists | Devin Vassell | 5 |
Grizzlies Leaders
| Category | Player | Stat |
| Points | Cedric Coward | 19 |
| Rebounds | Cedric Coward | 11 |
| Rebounds | Zach Edey | 11 |
| Assists | Vince Williams Jr. | 9 |
| Bench Points | Cam Spencer | 15 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Who scored the most points in the game?
De’Aaron Fox led all scorers with 26 points for San Antonio.
Who was the top scorer for Memphis?
Cedric Coward led Memphis with 19 points and also grabbed 11 rebounds.
What was the final score?
San Antonio defeated Memphis 111 to 101.
Which team shot better from the field?
San Antonio shot 48 percent from the field, while Memphis shot 40 percent.
Who led the game in rebounds?
Cedric Coward and Zach Edey led Memphis with 11 rebounds each.
Why did San Antonio win?
The Spurs won because of superior shooting efficiency, better three point accuracy, fewer turnovers, stronger free throw shooting, and excellent fourth quarter execution.
Conclusion
The san antonio spurs vs memphis grizzlies match player stats reveal far more than a simple ten point victory. San Antonio demonstrated why it became one of the Western Conference’s strongest teams by combining efficient offense, disciplined defense, and balanced scoring contributions. De’Aaron Fox’s 26 points, Harrison Barnes’ veteran leadership, and Keldon Johnson’s impactful bench performance proved decisive.
For Memphis, Cedric Coward, Jaren Jackson Jr., Vince Williams Jr., and Zach Edey delivered respectable individual performances, but inefficient shooting and a difficult fourth quarter ultimately prevented an upset. The game serves as a valuable case study in how efficiency often outweighs raw volume in modern NBA basketball.
