Philadelphia Eagles vs Green Bay Packers Match Player Stats
The philadelphia eagles vs green bay packers match player stats tell the story of one of the most defensive and hard fought NFL contests of the 2025 season. While many fans expected a high scoring battle between two talented offenses, the game instead became a showcase of disciplined defensive football, field position, and timely execution. Philadelphia secured a narrow 10 to 7 victory over Green Bay, improving its record to 7 and 2, while the Packers dropped to 5, 3, and 1 after an intense four quarter battle.
Unlike games decided by explosive offensive performances, this matchup rewarded patience, consistency, and the ability to capitalize on limited opportunities. Every drive carried importance because both defenses consistently forced difficult situations. Quarterbacks had little room for error, rushing attacks faced heavy resistance, and special teams also influenced field position throughout the afternoon.
This detailed analysis explores every important aspect of the game, including individual player performances, team statistics, offensive efficiency, defensive execution, and the moments that ultimately decided the outcome. By looking beyond the final score, readers can better understand how Philadelphia earned a hard fought road victory against one of the league’s most competitive teams.
Match Overview
Philadelphia entered the game with momentum and a strong road record, while Green Bay aimed to protect home field and strengthen its position in the standings. Both teams featured experienced quarterbacks, productive running backs, and talented defensive units capable of changing the outcome at any moment.
Despite the offensive talent available on both sidelines, the game quickly developed into a defensive contest. Neither offense managed to score during the first half, highlighting how effectively both coaching staffs prepared their defensive game plans.
Final Score
| Team | Score |
| Philadelphia Eagles | 10 |
| Green Bay Packers | 7 |
The three point margin accurately reflected how evenly matched the teams were throughout most of the contest.
Quarter by Quarter Breakdown
The scoring remained quiet for much of the afternoon before both offenses finally found success late in the game.
| Quarter | Philadelphia | Green Bay |
| First Quarter | 0 | 0 |
| Second Quarter | 0 | 0 |
| Third Quarter | 3 | 0 |
| Fourth Quarter | 7 | 7 |
The scoreless first half demonstrated excellent defensive discipline from both teams. Philadelphia finally broke the deadlock in the third quarter with a field goal before extending the lead with a touchdown in the fourth. Green Bay responded with a late touchdown but could not generate another scoring drive before time expired.
Philadelphia Eagles vs Green Bay Packers Match Player Stats Breakdown
The philadelphia eagles vs green bay packers match player stats reveal that efficiency mattered far more than volume. Neither offense produced huge numbers, making every successful play significantly more valuable.
Philadelphia executed better during key moments, protected the football more effectively, and generated pressure on Green Bay’s quarterback throughout the game.
Philadelphia Eagles Offensive Leaders
Jalen Hurts
Jalen Hurts delivered an efficient performance despite facing consistent defensive pressure.
| Passing Statistic | Total |
| Completions | 15 |
| Attempts | 26 |
| Passing Yards | 183 |
| Average | 7.0 |
| Passing Touchdowns | 1 |
| Interceptions | 0 |
| Sacks Taken | 0 |
| Passer Rating | 92.3 |
Although the passing yardage was modest, Hurts avoided costly mistakes. His ability to finish drives without throwing an interception became one of the biggest differences in the game. Avoiding sacks also allowed Philadelphia to maintain offensive rhythm during several important possessions.
Saquon Barkley
The Eagles leaned heavily on Saquon Barkley to establish offensive balance.
| Rushing Statistic | Total |
| Carries | 22 |
| Rushing Yards | 60 |
| Average | 2.7 |
| Touchdowns | 0 |
| Long Rush | 15 |
While Barkley averaged only 2.7 yards per carry, his workload forced Green Bay’s defense to respect the running game. Several short gains helped Philadelphia manage the clock and create manageable passing situations.
DeVonta Smith
DeVonta Smith produced the Eagles’ biggest receiving performance.
| Receiving Statistic | Total |
| Receptions | 4 |
| Receiving Yards | 69 |
| Average | 17.3 |
| Touchdowns | 1 |
| Long Reception | 36 |
| Targets | 7 |
Smith’s touchdown proved decisive. His ability to stretch the field created explosive opportunities in a game where long plays were difficult to generate.
Green Bay Packers Offensive Leaders
Jordan Love
Jordan Love faced relentless pressure throughout the contest.
| Passing Statistic | Total |
| Completions | 20 |
| Attempts | 36 |
| Passing Yards | 176 |
| Average | 4.9 |
| Passing Touchdowns | 0 |
| Interceptions | 0 |
| Sacks Taken | 3 |
| Sack Yards Lost | 19 |
| Passer Rating | 68.8 |
Love completed more passes than Hurts but averaged fewer yards per attempt. Philadelphia’s pass rush consistently disrupted the timing of Green Bay’s offense, preventing explosive passing plays from developing.
Josh Jacobs
Josh Jacobs was Green Bay’s most productive offensive player on the ground.
| Rushing Statistic | Total |
| Carries | 21 |
| Rushing Yards | 74 |
| Average | 3.5 |
| Touchdowns | 1 |
| Long Rush | 11 |
Jacobs finished with more rushing yards than Barkley and scored Green Bay’s only touchdown. However, Philadelphia prevented him from producing the long runs needed to completely change the momentum.
Christian Watson
Christian Watson led Green Bay’s receiving group despite limited opportunities.
| Receiving Statistic | Total |
| Receptions | 2 |
| Receiving Yards | 45 |
| Average | 22.5 |
| Touchdowns | 0 |
| Long Reception | 25 |
| Targets | 4 |
Although Watson averaged an impressive 22.5 yards per catch, he received only four targets. Philadelphia’s secondary effectively limited explosive passing opportunities throughout the game.
Comparing the Quarterbacks
The quarterback battle was defined by decision making rather than spectacular statistics.
| Category | Jalen Hurts | Jordan Love |
| Completions | 15 | 20 |
| Attempts | 26 | 36 |
| Passing Yards | 183 | 176 |
| Touchdowns | 1 | 0 |
| Interceptions | 0 | 0 |
| Sacks Taken | 0 | 3 |
| Passer Rating | 92.3 | 68.8 |
Hurts finished with the higher passer rating and avoided sacks entirely, demonstrating excellent pocket awareness. Love remained competitive but lost valuable yardage because of Philadelphia’s aggressive defensive front.
Team Offensive Comparison
Looking at the overall offensive production helps explain why the game remained close until the final minutes.
| Offensive Category | Philadelphia | Green Bay |
| Total Rushing Attempts | 34 | 27 |
| Total Rushing Yards | 111 | 104 |
| Rushing Average | 3.3 | 3.9 |
| Total Receptions | 15 | 20 |
| Receiving Yards | 183 | 176 |
Philadelphia held only a slight edge in total production, but efficiency during critical situations separated the two teams. The Eagles converted scoring opportunities more effectively while protecting the football during meaningful possessions.
Defensive Performance Analysis
While the offensive statistics attracted plenty of attention after the game, the defensive units were the true stars. Both teams consistently forced difficult situations, limited explosive plays, and kept scoring opportunities to a minimum. The low final score reflected outstanding preparation from both coaching staffs and disciplined execution by the players.
Philadelphia’s defense ultimately made the bigger impact because it pressured the quarterback, forced turnovers, and prevented Green Bay from sustaining long drives when the game reached its most important moments.
Philadelphia Eagles Defensive Statistics
| Category | Total |
| Total Tackles | 67 |
| Solo Tackles | 41 |
| Sacks | 3 |
| Tackles for Loss | 5 |
| Pass Deflections | 5 |
| Quarterback Hits | 8 |
| Interceptions | 0 |
These numbers highlight how active the Eagles were throughout the afternoon. Eight quarterback hits and three sacks consistently disrupted Green Bay’s offensive rhythm. Even when Jordan Love completed passes, he rarely looked comfortable in the pocket because pressure arrived quickly.
The five pass deflections also demonstrate strong coverage in the secondary. Philadelphia successfully challenged passing lanes and forced Green Bay to settle for shorter completions.
Green Bay Packers Defensive Statistics
| Category | Total |
| Total Tackles | 66 |
| Solo Tackles | 35 |
| Sacks | 0 |
| Tackles for Loss | 6 |
| Pass Deflections | 2 |
| Quarterback Hits | 0 |
| Interceptions | 0 |
Green Bay’s defense also performed well for much of the game. Limiting Saquon Barkley to only 60 rushing yards on 22 carries showed that the Packers effectively controlled the line of scrimmage against the run.
However, the absence of sacks and quarterback hits proved costly. Jalen Hurts enjoyed a cleaner pocket than Jordan Love, allowing Philadelphia’s offense to remain composed during key drives.
Why Philadelphia’s Defense Made the Difference
One of the biggest stories from the game was the contrast between each team’s pass rush.
Philadelphia generated:
- Three sacks
- Eight quarterback hits
- Constant pressure throughout the game
Green Bay generated:
- Zero sacks
- Zero quarterback hits
That difference may not appear massive at first glance, but it had a direct impact on the final score. Hurts had enough time to complete important throws, while Love frequently faced collapsing protection.
In close NFL games, pressure often matters more than total yardage, and this contest perfectly illustrated that principle.
Ball Security Played a Major Role
Turnovers often determine close football games, and this matchup was no exception.
Philadelphia Ball Security
| Category | Total |
| Team Fumbles | 1 |
| Fumbles Lost | 1 |
| Fumbles Recovered | 2 |
Green Bay Ball Security
| Category | Total |
| Team Fumbles | 3 |
| Fumbles Lost | 2 |
| Fumbles Recovered | 2 |
Green Bay’s three fumbles created unnecessary pressure throughout the game. Losing possession twice prevented the Packers from maximizing valuable offensive opportunities.
Philadelphia also committed a turnover, but the Eagles limited their mistakes and capitalized on Green Bay’s errors more effectively.
Running Game Comparison
Neither rushing attack dominated the contest, but both teams remained committed to establishing balance.
Philadelphia Ground Attack
The Eagles finished with 111 rushing yards on 34 attempts, averaging 3.3 yards per carry.
Although those numbers were not spectacular, the consistent rushing attack served several important purposes.
- Controlled game tempo.
- Reduced pressure on the passing game.
- Helped manage the clock.
- Forced Green Bay to respect play action opportunities.
Saquon Barkley handled most of the workload, demonstrating patience even when large running lanes were unavailable.
Green Bay Ground Attack
Green Bay rushed for 104 yards on 27 carries while averaging 3.9 yards per attempt.
Josh Jacobs produced the Packers’ lone touchdown and showed good vision between the tackles. However, Philadelphia consistently prevented explosive runs by maintaining disciplined gap control.
The difference came in critical situations, where the Eagles limited Jacobs’ ability to convert long gains into scoring opportunities.
Passing Game Comparison
Passing efficiency proved more valuable than passing volume.
Philadelphia Passing Summary
Jalen Hurts completed 15 of his 26 passes for 183 yards and one touchdown.
His statistics reflect a quarterback who prioritized smart decision making over unnecessary risks. Every completion helped sustain drives, and the absence of interceptions preserved scoring opportunities.
Green Bay Passing Summary
Jordan Love completed 20 of 36 passes for 176 yards without a touchdown.
Although he completed more passes, Green Bay struggled to generate explosive plays downfield. Philadelphia’s pass coverage forced shorter completions while the defensive line applied constant pressure.
The result was an offense that moved the football in small increments but rarely threatened to break open the game.
Receiving Leaders Compared
Wide receivers played important roles despite the defensive nature of the contest.
DeVonta Smith’s Impact
Smith finished with:
- 4 receptions
- 69 receiving yards
- 17.3 yards per reception
- 1 touchdown
His touchdown represented the biggest offensive play of the afternoon and ultimately became the game winning score.
Smith’s average of 17.3 yards per catch also demonstrates how efficiently he used his opportunities.
Christian Watson’s Production
Watson recorded:
- 2 receptions
- 45 receiving yards
- 22.5 yards per reception
While Watson averaged more yards per catch than Smith, Green Bay simply could not involve him consistently enough to fully capitalize on his big play ability.
Special Teams Analysis
Close games often come down to field position, making special teams extremely important.
Philadelphia Special Teams
Jake Elliott converted his only field goal attempt from 39 yards while also making his extra point.
| Category | Total |
| Field Goals | 1 of 1 |
| Long Field Goal | 39 |
| Extra Points | 1 of 1 |
| Total Points | 4 |
Braden Mann also contributed with strong punting.
| Category | Total |
| Punts | 5 |
| Average | 47.6 |
| Long | 66 |
| Inside 20 | 1 |
The 66 yard punt significantly improved field position during one of the game’s defensive exchanges.
Green Bay Special Teams
Brandon McManus experienced a more difficult afternoon.
| Category | Total |
| Field Goals | 0 of 1 |
| Extra Points | 1 of 1 |
| Total Points | 1 |
Missing a field goal in a game decided by only three points became one of the defining moments.
Daniel Whelan punted effectively.
| Category | Total |
| Punts | 5 |
| Average | 47.8 |
| Long | 59 |
| Inside 20 | 1 |
Both punters performed well, but Philadelphia received more overall value from its kicking unit because Elliott converted every scoring opportunity available.
Return Game Comparison
Field position remained important throughout the afternoon.
Kick Returns
| Team | Returns | Yards | Average | Long |
| Philadelphia | 2 | 51 | 25.5 | 27 |
| Green Bay | 3 | 77 | 25.7 | 33 |
Punt Returns
| Team | Returns | Yards | Average | Long |
| Philadelphia | 2 | 31 | 15.5 | 18 |
| Green Bay | 2 | 22 | 11.0 | 12 |
Neither team produced a game changing return, but Philadelphia generated slightly better production on punt returns, creating improved starting field position on multiple possessions.
Complete Team Statistics Comparison
The overall numbers show just how competitive this matchup was. Neither team dominated in total production, which is why execution in critical moments ultimately decided the winner.
| Category | Philadelphia Eagles | Green Bay Packers |
| Final Score | 10 | 7 |
| Passing Yards | 183 | 176 |
| Rushing Yards | 111 | 104 |
| Total Receiving Yards | 183 | 176 |
| Rushing Attempts | 34 | 27 |
| Receptions | 15 | 20 |
| Team Fumbles | 1 | 3 |
| Fumbles Lost | 1 | 2 |
| Sacks | 3 | 0 |
| Quarterback Hits | 8 | 0 |
| Total Tackles | 67 | 66 |
| Pass Deflections | 5 | 2 |
Several categories remained nearly identical, yet Philadelphia consistently gained a small advantage where it mattered most. Those small differences added up over four quarters and proved enough to secure the victory.
What the Player Stats Reveal
Looking only at the final score does not fully explain how this game unfolded. The player statistics provide a much clearer picture.
First, both quarterbacks protected the football by avoiding interceptions. However, Jalen Hurts converted one passing touchdown while Jordan Love finished without one. That single scoring play became the deciding factor.
Second, Philadelphia’s offensive line deserves significant recognition. Keeping Hurts upright for the entire game against a capable Green Bay defense allowed the offense to remain patient and avoid negative plays.
Third, the Eagles’ defensive front consistently influenced Green Bay’s offense. Quarterback pressure rarely appears in highlight reels, but it often determines close games. Three sacks and eight quarterback hits forced Green Bay to abandon several promising drives.
Finally, special teams quietly contributed to the result. Jake Elliott converted every scoring opportunity presented to him, while Green Bay left points on the field after missing a field goal attempt.
Most Valuable Performers
Several players delivered performances that significantly influenced the outcome.
Jalen Hurts
Hurts did not post eye catching passing numbers, yet he played one of the smartest games of the season.
His performance included:
- 183 passing yards
- One touchdown
- No interceptions
- No sacks taken
- 92.3 passer rating
Those numbers demonstrate efficiency rather than volume. In a defensive contest, protecting possession and capitalizing on limited scoring opportunities becomes more valuable than throwing for 300 yards.
DeVonta Smith
Smith proved to be Philadelphia’s most dangerous receiving threat.
His touchdown reception gave the Eagles the offensive breakthrough they needed after both teams struggled to score during the first three quarters.
His ability to create separation against Green Bay’s secondary also forced the defense to remain cautious throughout the game.
Saquon Barkley
Although Barkley’s rushing average remained below three yards per carry, his contribution should not be measured solely by yardage.
Twenty two rushing attempts helped Philadelphia control possession, manage the clock, and maintain offensive balance. His physical running style also wore down Green Bay’s defensive front during the second half.
Josh Jacobs
Jacobs produced Green Bay’s most productive offensive performance.
He rushed for 74 yards and scored the Packers’ only touchdown. Throughout the game he consistently fought for extra yards despite facing a disciplined Eagles defensive line.
Unfortunately for Green Bay, Jacobs received limited support from the passing game during critical possessions.
Jordan Love
Love displayed toughness despite constant pressure.
Completing 20 passes under difficult circumstances reflected determination, but the inability to produce a passing touchdown ultimately limited Green Bay’s comeback effort.
Philadelphia’s pass rush prevented him from finding consistent rhythm throughout the afternoon.
Biggest Turning Points
Several moments shifted momentum toward Philadelphia.
The First Score
After a scoreless first half, Philadelphia finally broke through with a field goal in the third quarter.
Although only three points, that drive forced Green Bay to become slightly more aggressive offensively.
DeVonta Smith’s Touchdown
Smith’s touchdown catch extended Philadelphia’s advantage and placed additional pressure on Green Bay.
With points becoming extremely difficult to earn, every successful offensive drive carried enormous importance.
Defensive Pressure
Philadelphia’s defensive line repeatedly forced Jordan Love into uncomfortable situations.
Even when sacks were not recorded, quarterback hits disrupted timing and prevented deeper passing concepts from developing.
Green Bay’s Missed Field Goal
In a game decided by only three points, every missed scoring opportunity mattered.
Failing to convert the field goal increased pressure on Green Bay’s offense during the closing minutes.
Areas Philadelphia Executed Better
Several strategic advantages helped the Eagles leave Green Bay with a victory.
Better Pass Protection
Allowing zero sacks against a strong defensive opponent demonstrated excellent offensive line play.
Hurts consistently had enough time to read the defense and deliver accurate throws.
Defensive Pressure
Philadelphia generated pressure without sacrificing coverage.
The defensive line disrupted Green Bay while the secondary prevented explosive plays downfield.
Situational Football
The Eagles performed better during high leverage moments.
Whether converting scoring opportunities, protecting possession, or forcing Green Bay into difficult third downs, Philadelphia consistently made the plays that mattered most.
Areas Green Bay Can Improve
Although the Packers lost by only three points, several improvements could change similar games in the future.
Better pass protection would reduce pressure on Jordan Love and create more opportunities for deeper passing plays.
Creating pressure on opposing quarterbacks should also become a priority. Recording zero sacks and zero quarterback hits allowed Philadelphia’s offense to remain comfortable throughout the game.
Reducing turnovers will also be essential. Three team fumbles placed unnecessary pressure on both the offense and defense.
Finally, improving red zone efficiency could help convert competitive performances into victories.
Overall Match Analysis
The philadelphia eagles vs green bay packers match player stats illustrate that football is not always about explosive offense or spectacular individual performances.
Instead, this game highlighted the importance of discipline, execution, and consistency.
Philadelphia won because it protected its quarterback, generated defensive pressure, avoided major mistakes, and capitalized on scoring opportunities.
Green Bay remained competitive from the opening kickoff until the final whistle, but several small statistical disadvantages accumulated throughout the afternoon.
The final score reflected a contest where every possession mattered and every mistake carried significant consequences.
Perhaps the most impressive aspect of Philadelphia’s performance was its composure. Rather than forcing risky plays against a disciplined defense, the Eagles trusted their game plan and patiently waited for opportunities to appear.
Likewise, Green Bay showed resilience despite facing constant pressure. The Packers never allowed the game to become one sided and remained within striking distance until the closing moments.
The philadelphia eagles vs green bay packers match player stats ultimately reveal a contest decided by efficiency instead of dominance. Philadelphia executed slightly better in nearly every critical category, and those small advantages combined to produce a well earned 10 to 7 road victory.
Frequently Asked Questions
1. Who was the leading passer in the Philadelphia Eagles vs Green Bay Packers game?
Jalen Hurts led Philadelphia by completing 15 of 26 passes for 183 yards, one touchdown, no interceptions, and a passer rating of 92.3. Jordan Love led Green Bay with 20 completions on 36 attempts for 176 yards without a touchdown.
2. Who had the most rushing yards in the game?
Josh Jacobs finished as the game’s leading rusher with 74 yards on 21 carries and scored Green Bay’s only touchdown. Saquon Barkley led Philadelphia with 60 rushing yards on 22 carries.
3. Which receiver had the biggest impact?
DeVonta Smith was the most impactful receiver. He caught four passes for 69 yards and scored the only receiving touchdown of the game, making his performance one of the key reasons Philadelphia secured the victory.
4. How did Philadelphia win the game?
Philadelphia won by playing cleaner football in critical situations. The Eagles protected Jalen Hurts from sacks, forced three sacks on Jordan Love, generated eight quarterback hits, converted their scoring opportunities, and committed fewer costly mistakes.
5. What do the philadelphia eagles vs green bay packers match player stats show?
The philadelphia eagles vs green bay packers match player stats show that the game was decided by efficiency rather than total offensive production. Philadelphia made the most of its opportunities, while Green Bay struggled with turnovers, quarterback pressure, and missed scoring chances.
Conclusion
The philadelphia eagles vs green bay packers match player stats provide a complete picture of a game where discipline, execution, and defensive consistency proved more valuable than explosive offensive numbers. Philadelphia earned a hard fought 10 to 7 victory by protecting its quarterback, creating constant pressure on Jordan Love, and making the most of limited scoring opportunities.
Jalen Hurts delivered an efficient performance without committing turnovers, while DeVonta Smith’s touchdown catch became the defining offensive play of the afternoon. Saquon Barkley contributed through a heavy workload that helped control possession, and the Eagles’ defense consistently disrupted Green Bay’s offensive rhythm with three sacks and eight quarterback hits.
For the Packers, Josh Jacobs delivered a strong rushing performance and scored the team’s only touchdown, while Jordan Love battled through persistent defensive pressure. Despite remaining competitive throughout all four quarters, Green Bay’s turnovers, missed field goal, and inability to generate pressure on Hurts ultimately proved costly.
Beyond the final score, this matchup demonstrated how small statistical advantages can determine the outcome of closely contested NFL games. Every possession, every defensive stop, and every special teams play carried added importance in a contest where points were extremely difficult to score. The numbers confirm that Philadelphia’s balanced approach and timely execution were enough to secure an important road victory.
