Indiana Fever vs Atlanta Dream Match Player Stats
The Indiana Fever vs Atlanta Dream match player stats tell the story of one of the most dramatic games of the 2026 WNBA regular season. Indiana defeated Atlanta 95-91 in overtime at State Farm Arena, overcoming a late-game deficit after the Dream had controlled much of the middle portion of the contest. The official WNBA record lists the game as being played on August 16, 2026, with an attendance of 17,044.
The final score does not fully explain how competitive this matchup was. Atlanta led 72-64 after three quarters, but Indiana produced a major fourth-quarter response and then took control in overtime. The Fever finished with 36 made field goals on 81 attempts, while Atlanta made 29 of 82 shots. Both teams collected 40 rebounds, but Indiana committed only nine turnovers compared with 14 for Atlanta.
Caitlin Clark was one of the biggest reasons Indiana survived the difficult road matchup. She finished with 26 points and nine assists, giving the Fever a major offensive creator throughout the game. Aliyah Boston controlled the glass with 14 rebounds, while Atlanta’s Allisha Gray delivered an outstanding scoring performance with 32 points. Angel Reese also recorded 14 rebounds and six assists for the Dream.
The result also completed a 2-2 split in the season series between the teams.
Indiana Fever vs Atlanta Dream Match Player Stats at a Glance
The most important numbers from the game show how closely matched these teams were in several areas.
| Category | Indiana Fever | Atlanta Dream |
| Final Score | 95 | 91 |
| Regulation Score | 81 | 81 |
| Overtime | 14 | 10 |
| Field Goals | 36-81 | 29-82 |
| Field Goal Percentage | 44% | 35% |
| Three-Pointers | 6-24 | 8-32 |
| Three-Point Percentage | 25% | 25% |
| Free Throws | 17-23 | 25-26 |
| Free Throw Percentage | 74% | 96% |
| Rebounds | 40 | 40 |
| Assists | 18 | 21 |
| Turnovers | 9 | 14 |
| Steals | 8 | 2 |
| Blocks | 6 | 4 |
The shooting numbers immediately highlight the main difference. Atlanta made more three-pointers and was far more accurate from the free-throw line, but Indiana generated a considerably better overall field-goal percentage.
That efficiency mattered because the Fever did not need to rely heavily on three-point shooting. Their 44% overall shooting allowed them to compensate for making only six three-pointers.
Atlanta, meanwhile, made eight threes but shot only 35% from the field. The Dream’s 25-of-26 free-throw performance kept them within striking distance and helped them maintain their advantage for much of regulation.
Final Score and Quarter-by-Quarter Breakdown
The game followed a very different pattern from quarter to quarter.
| Period | Indiana Fever | Atlanta Dream |
| First Quarter | 21 | 21 |
| Second Quarter | 19 | 23 |
| Third Quarter | 24 | 28 |
| Fourth Quarter | 17 | 9 |
| Overtime | 14 | 10 |
| Final | 95 | 91 |
The opening quarter ended level at 21-21, setting the tone for a tightly contested matchup.
Atlanta then gained control in the second quarter. The Dream outscored Indiana 23-19 to take a 44-40 halftime advantage.
The third quarter was Atlanta’s strongest scoring period. The Dream produced 28 points compared with Indiana’s 24, extending the lead to 72-64 entering the fourth quarter.
That eight-point advantage appeared significant, but Indiana completely changed the momentum in the final regulation period.
Indiana’s Fourth-Quarter Comeback
The fourth quarter was the turning point.
Atlanta managed only nine points in the period while Indiana scored 17. The Fever’s defensive pressure and improved offensive execution prevented the Dream from protecting their lead.
The game ultimately reached an 81-81 tie at the end of regulation.
This comeback is one of the most important details to consider when reviewing the Indiana Fever vs Atlanta Dream match player stats. A simple look at the final box score shows a four-point Indiana victory, but the quarter splits reveal that the Fever had to overcome a substantial second-half deficit.
Overtime Decided the Game
Indiana continued its momentum into overtime.
The Fever scored 14 points in the extra period, compared with 10 for Atlanta. That four-point overtime advantage matched the final margin.
The official WNBA game recap notes that Indiana used overtime to pull away after Atlanta had multiple opportunities late in regulation.
The extra period therefore became a test of execution rather than simply scoring talent. Indiana protected the ball, created enough quality scoring opportunities and converted key possessions when the game was at its most important stage.
Caitlin Clark’s 26 Points and 9 Assists
Caitlin Clark was central to Indiana’s offensive performance.
She finished with:
- 26 points
- 9 assists
Her nine assists were especially important because Atlanta’s defense had to account for her scoring threat at the same time.
Clark’s value in this game was not limited to her point total. A player who can score 26 points while also creating nine assists forces the defense to make difficult choices. If Atlanta committed extra attention toward her scoring opportunities, Indiana had chances to create elsewhere.
The official WNBA report confirms Clark’s 26-point, nine-assist performance.
Her contribution also helped Indiana maintain offensive balance despite making only 25% of its three-point attempts.
That is an important distinction when evaluating player performance. A guard does not necessarily need to have an exceptional three-point shooting night to influence the outcome. Clark’s scoring, playmaking and ability to keep defensive attention occupied all contributed to Indiana’s eventual comeback.
Allisha Gray Leads Atlanta With 32 Points
Allisha Gray produced the highest individual scoring total of the game.
She finished with 32 points for Atlanta, matching her career high according to the official game recap.
Her scoring was a major reason Atlanta remained competitive throughout regulation.
Gray’s performance was particularly important because the Dream’s overall shooting percentage was only 35%. When a team shoots that poorly from the field, it needs high-level individual scoring to prevent the offense from stalling.
Gray provided that production.
Her 32 points also demonstrate why the final result cannot simply be described as a poor offensive performance from Atlanta. The team struggled collectively with shot-making, but Gray individually delivered an elite scoring performance.
The bigger issue for Atlanta was maintaining offensive efficiency and execution during the closing stages.
Aliyah Boston Controls the Rebounding Battle
Aliyah Boston was Indiana’s leading rebounder with 14 boards.
Her rebounding performance became particularly important because Atlanta also had strong interior production from Angel Reese.
Boston’s 14 rebounds helped Indiana finish with 40 total rebounds, exactly matching Atlanta’s team total.
That balance is significant.
When two teams finish with identical rebounding numbers, individual positioning and the timing of important rebounds can matter more than the raw team total. Indiana needed Boston to compete physically against Atlanta’s frontcourt, and her 14 rebounds provided that stability.
Boston’s contribution also helped Indiana maintain possessions and limit the impact of Atlanta’s interior players.
Angel Reese Provides 14 Rebounds and 6 Assists
Angel Reese was one of Atlanta’s most versatile contributors.
She recorded:
- 14 rebounds
- 6 assists
- 15 points
The 14 rebounds matched Boston’s total, making the battle between the two frontcourt players one of the more interesting individual comparisons in the game.
Reese’s six assists were also significant. They show that her role extended beyond rebounding and interior scoring.
Atlanta benefited when Reese could influence the game as a passer because Indiana had to respect her ability to create opportunities for teammates.
The official WNBA game recap confirms that Reese finished with 15 points, 14 rebounds and six assists.
Team Shooting Efficiency Explains the Result
One of the clearest lessons from the Indiana Fever vs Atlanta Dream match player stats is that three-point volume did not determine the winner.
Both teams shot 25% from three-point range.
Indiana:
- 6-of-24 from three
- 25%
Atlanta:
- 8-of-32 from three
- 25%
Atlanta made two additional three-pointers, but those extra baskets were not enough to offset the difference in overall shooting.
Indiana shot 44% from the field.
Atlanta shot 35%.
That nine-percentage-point difference in field-goal accuracy was substantial.
The Fever were able to generate offense through a broader range of scoring opportunities, while Atlanta’s offense became less efficient as the game progressed.
This is an important reminder when reading a basketball box score. Three-point totals can attract attention, but overall field-goal efficiency, turnovers, free throws and shot volume can have a greater impact on the final result.
Free Throws Kept Atlanta in the Game
Atlanta had a major advantage at the free-throw line.
The Dream shot 25-of-26 for 96%.
Indiana shot 17-of-23 for 74%.
That gave Atlanta eight more made free throws.
Ordinarily, such an advantage can be enough to decide a close game. In this case, however, Indiana’s stronger field-goal percentage and lower turnover total helped offset Atlanta’s free-throw edge.
The free-throw statistics also explain why the game stayed close even when Atlanta struggled to make shots from the field.
For Atlanta, the ability to earn free throws was one of the strongest parts of the offensive performance.
For Indiana, limiting turnovers and converting enough field-goal attempts proved more important.
Turnovers Were a Major Difference
Indiana committed only nine turnovers.
Atlanta committed 14.
That five-turnover difference is one of the most useful statistics in the entire box score.
Possession value becomes extremely important in overtime games. Every lost possession can represent an opportunity that cannot be recovered.
Indiana’s nine turnovers allowed the Fever to maintain greater offensive control.
Atlanta’s 14 turnovers gave Indiana additional opportunities, especially during the late stages when the margin was narrow.
The WNBA’s official game data also shows Indiana finishing with more steals, eight compared with two for Atlanta.
That combination of fewer turnovers and more steals points toward stronger defensive activity from Indiana.
Indiana’s Defensive Activity Made a Difference
The Fever finished with:
- 8 steals
- 6 blocks
Atlanta recorded:
- 2 steals
- 4 blocks
The difference in steals stands out.
Indiana’s eight steals compared with Atlanta’s two indicate that the Fever were more disruptive defensively.
This did not mean Indiana completely shut down Atlanta. The Dream still scored 91 points. However, defensive disruption can become especially valuable when a game enters its closing stages.
Indiana needed stops to recover from the eight-point deficit entering the fourth quarter.
The defensive numbers suggest that the Fever succeeded in creating enough disruption to change the game’s momentum.
Why Atlanta Lost Despite Scoring 91 Points
It is easy to look at Atlanta’s 91 points and conclude that offense was not the problem.
The reality is more complicated.
The Dream’s 91 points were enough to win many games, but the team’s 35% field-goal shooting created a major efficiency problem.
Atlanta made only 29 of 82 field-goal attempts.
That means the Dream missed 53 shots from the field.
The team’s 96% free-throw shooting helped compensate for some of those misses, but not enough to overcome Indiana’s superior overall shooting.
Atlanta also had 14 turnovers.
When combined, inefficient field-goal shooting and additional lost possessions created a difficult formula for winning.
The Dream still had a realistic opportunity to win because they played well enough during the second and third quarters to build an eight-point advantage.
The problem was maintaining that advantage.
Why Indiana Won
Indiana’s victory can be explained through several connected factors.
1. Better Overall Shooting
The Fever shot 44% compared with Atlanta’s 35%.
That was arguably the biggest statistical advantage.
2. Fewer Turnovers
Indiana committed nine turnovers while Atlanta committed 14.
That gave Indiana better possession efficiency.
3. Strong Fourth Quarter
Indiana outscored Atlanta 17-9 in the fourth quarter.
That erased the Dream’s eight-point advantage entering the period.
4. Overtime Execution
Indiana scored 14 points in overtime.
Atlanta scored 10.
The Fever finished the game better when the pressure was highest.
5. Balanced Individual Contributions
Clark provided scoring and playmaking.
Boston controlled the boards.
Other Indiana players also contributed enough to keep Atlanta from focusing exclusively on one offensive option.
The official WNBA recap reported that four Indiana starters finished with at least 18 points, providing useful context for the team’s balanced scoring attack.
A Closer Look at the Matchup
The game was not simply a contest between two star guards.
It featured several important individual battles.
Caitlin Clark vs Atlanta’s Perimeter Defense
Clark’s 26 points and nine assists made her one of the game’s most influential players.
Atlanta had to balance pressure against her with the need to protect against Indiana’s other scoring threats.
Aliyah Boston vs Angel Reese
Boston and Reese both collected 14 rebounds.
That statistical tie reflects how important the interior battle was.
Reese also added six assists, while Boston’s primary statistical impact in the supplied data came through her rebounding.
Allisha Gray vs Indiana’s Defense
Gray’s 32 points were the highest scoring total by either team.
Indiana’s challenge was not preventing Gray from scoring entirely. Instead, the Fever needed to limit the overall effectiveness of Atlanta’s offense around her.
That distinction matters because Gray was able to produce at an elite level while Atlanta still lost.
The Importance of the Fourth Quarter
If one period best explains the final outcome, it is the fourth quarter.
Atlanta entered the period with a 72-64 advantage.
Instead of extending that lead, the Dream scored only nine points.
Indiana scored 17.
That eight-point swing completely erased Atlanta’s eight-point advantage.
The lesson is straightforward: Atlanta’s strong middle-game performance created the opportunity to win, but the offense could not maintain its efficiency when Indiana increased the defensive pressure.
The official game recap also describes Indiana’s late defensive adjustments as important to the outcome.
Overtime Shows the Difference in Execution
Overtime often exposes which team can remain organized under pressure.
Indiana scored 14 points.
Atlanta scored 10.
The Fever’s overtime advantage was not enormous, but it was enough to secure the win.
Indiana’s ability to keep producing quality possessions was particularly important after the teams had already played four tightly contested quarters.
The overtime period also reinforced the importance of turnovers. Atlanta had fewer opportunities to recover once Indiana established control.
Season Series Ends 2-2
The victory meant the four-game season series between Indiana and Atlanta ended tied at 2-2.
That is an important piece of context because neither team could claim complete dominance over the other during the season.
The series demonstrated how different game scripts could produce different outcomes.
Atlanta had already shown that it could challenge Indiana offensively and win through strong interior play, transition opportunities and pressure defense.
Indiana’s overtime victory showed that it could respond to a difficult game script, overcome a deficit and execute in the final minutes.
A 2-2 season series therefore provides a more accurate picture of the rivalry than any single result.
What the Statistics Reveal About Indiana
The numbers suggest several strengths for the Fever.
Efficient Scoring
A 44% field-goal percentage was the foundation of the victory.
Ball Security
Nine turnovers was an excellent number in a 95-point performance.
Defensive Disruption
Eight steals and six blocks show that Indiana generated defensive activity.
Rebounding Stability
The Fever matched Atlanta 40-40 on the glass.
Late-Game Resilience
The fourth-quarter comeback and overtime performance demonstrate the team’s ability to respond under pressure.
These characteristics combined to produce a road victory despite Atlanta leading by eight points after three quarters.
What the Statistics Reveal About Atlanta
Atlanta’s numbers also contain several positives.
Excellent Free-Throw Shooting
The Dream made 25 of 26 free throws.
That is elite efficiency.
Strong Assist Total
Atlanta recorded 21 assists, three more than Indiana.
That indicates meaningful ball movement and play creation.
Strong Individual Scoring
Gray scored 32 points.
Reese contributed 15 points, 14 rebounds and six assists.
Three-Point Production
Atlanta made eight three-pointers compared with Indiana’s six.
The problem was not a complete lack of perimeter production. It was overall shot efficiency and late-game execution.
Where the Dream Can Improve
The most obvious improvement area is field-goal efficiency.
Making 29 of 82 attempts resulted in a 35% shooting night.
Even with excellent free-throw shooting, that level of field-goal efficiency puts significant pressure on the defense.
Turnovers are another area to monitor.
Fourteen turnovers compared with Indiana’s nine created a possession disadvantage that became more damaging as the game moved into overtime.
Finally, Atlanta needed better fourth-quarter execution.
The Dream scored 28 points in the third quarter but only nine in the fourth.
That dramatic drop was the clearest statistical reason the Fever were able to force overtime.
Where the Fever Can Improve
Indiana won, but the performance was not flawless.
A 25% three-point percentage leaves room for improvement.
The Fever made only six of 24 attempts from long range.
Their 17-of-23 free-throw shooting was also below Atlanta’s standard from the line.
Indiana ultimately won because its overall field-goal efficiency, ball security and late-game execution compensated for those weaknesses.
Against another opponent, however, missing 18 three-point attempts and six free throws could become more costly.
Key Player Takeaways
The most important individual performances can be summarized clearly.
| Player | Team | Key Contribution |
| Caitlin Clark | Indiana Fever | 26 points, 9 assists |
| Aliyah Boston | Indiana Fever | 14 rebounds |
| Allisha Gray | Atlanta Dream | 32 points |
| Angel Reese | Atlanta Dream | 15 points, 14 rebounds, 6 assists |
Clark was Indiana’s leading scorer and playmaker.
Boston provided the strongest rebounding presence for the Fever.
Gray delivered the game’s highest scoring performance.
Reese supplied a multidimensional frontcourt performance through scoring, rebounding and passing.
These four performances illustrate why the game remained competitive until overtime.
Attendance and Game Details
The matchup was played at State Farm Arena in Atlanta, Georgia.
The official attendance was 17,044.
The officiating crew consisted of Marcy Williams, Tiara Cruse and Randy Richardson.
The game was also listed for viewing through ESPN and Disney+.
For readers who want to verify the final score, linescore and official game information, the official WNBA game record provides the authoritative game listing.
How to Read These Player Stats Correctly
A useful way to analyze a close basketball game is to avoid focusing on one statistic.
For example, Atlanta won the free-throw comparison and the assist comparison.
Indiana won the overall shooting percentage, turnover battle, steals category and final score.
The teams tied in rebounds.
That means there was no single statistical category that independently determined the outcome.
Instead, the result came from how several small advantages interacted.
Indiana’s better field-goal percentage helped offset Atlanta’s free-throw advantage.
Indiana’s lower turnover total provided extra possessions.
The Fever’s eight steals helped create defensive pressure.
The fourth-quarter scoring difference changed the game’s direction.
Then overtime execution completed the comeback.
That is why the Indiana Fever vs Atlanta Dream match player stats are more useful when viewed as a complete statistical profile rather than as a list of individual numbers.
What Fans Should Remember From This Game
There are several lasting conclusions from this matchup.
First, a strong three-quarter performance is not enough if a team cannot finish.
Atlanta led by eight points entering the fourth quarter but failed to preserve the advantage.
Second, efficient shooting can outweigh free-throw dominance.
The Dream made 25 free throws compared with Indiana’s 17, yet the Fever still won because of their superior field-goal percentage.
Third, turnovers matter in close games.
A five-turnover difference may not look enormous, but in an overtime game it can become decisive.
Fourth, star scoring needs complementary production.
Gray scored 32 points and still ended up on the losing side because Indiana received enough contributions across its lineup.
Finally, overtime rewards composure.
Indiana scored 14 points in the extra period and limited Atlanta to 10, turning a tied game into a four-point road victory.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who scored the most points in the Indiana Fever vs Atlanta Dream game?
Allisha Gray led all scorers with 32 points for Atlanta. Caitlin Clark led Indiana with 26 points.
What was the final score?
The Indiana Fever defeated the Atlanta Dream 95-91 in overtime.
How many rebounds did Aliyah Boston have?
Aliyah Boston recorded 14 rebounds for Indiana.
How many rebounds did Angel Reese have?
Angel Reese recorded 14 rebounds for Atlanta and also contributed six assists.
Did Caitlin Clark record an assist?
Yes. Clark finished with nine assists along with her 26 points.
Was the season series tied?
Yes. Indiana’s overtime victory made the four-game season series 2-2.
Conclusion
The Indiana Fever vs Atlanta Dream match player stats show a game that was decided by resilience, efficiency and late-game execution rather than one overwhelming statistical advantage.
Atlanta had several impressive numbers. The Dream shot 96% from the free-throw line, made eight three-pointers, recorded 21 assists and received a 32-point performance from Allisha Gray. Angel Reese added 15 points, 14 rebounds and six assists.
Indiana answered with better overall field-goal efficiency, stronger ball security and more defensive disruption. Caitlin Clark’s 26 points and nine assists gave the Fever a consistent offensive creator, while Aliyah Boston’s 14 rebounds helped Indiana compete evenly on the glass.
The biggest turning point came in the fourth quarter. After trailing 72-64 entering the period, Indiana outscored Atlanta 17-9 to force an 81-81 tie. The Fever then outscored the Dream 14-10 in overtime to complete the 95-91 victory.
The final statistical picture is therefore more revealing than the final score alone. Atlanta had the free-throw advantage and more assists, while Indiana had the better field-goal percentage, fewer turnovers, more steals and the stronger finish.
With the season series ending 2-2, this matchup also highlighted how evenly matched the two teams were across their four meetings. The August contest ultimately belonged to Indiana because the Fever were able to turn a difficult second-half situation into a controlled overtime finish.
