Denver Nuggets vs Toronto Raptors Match Player Stats
The denver nuggets vs toronto raptors match player stats tell the story of a Summer League game decided less by overall shooting volume and more by Denver’s third-quarter surge, efficient perimeter scoring, and Jahmi’us Ramsey’s remarkable perfect shooting night. The Nuggets defeated the Raptors 96-89 in the 2026 NBA Summer League consolation game at Thomas & Mack Center in Las Vegas. Both teams entered the contest with 3-1 records and finished their Summer League campaigns at 3-2.
Denver did not lead after the opening quarter. Toronto started strongly and finished the first period ahead 29-23. The game changed in the second quarter, when Denver answered with a 24-18 run to tie the contest 47-47 at halftime. The decisive stretch came after the break. Denver scored 30 points in the third quarter while holding Toronto to 20, creating a 10-point advantage entering the final period. Toronto won the fourth quarter 22-19, but the deficit was too large to erase.
The final score was Denver 96, Toronto 89, but the numbers underneath that result make the matchup far more interesting. Toronto actually shot better from the field, collected more rebounds, produced more assists, and generated 15 offensive rebounds. Denver, however, protected the ball better, made more three-pointers, shot free throws much more efficiently, and turned its best offensive stretch into a seven-point victory.
Denver Nuggets vs Toronto Raptors Match Player Stats: Quick Game Summary
Here are the most important numbers from the official game:
| Category | Denver Nuggets | Toronto Raptors |
| Final Score | 96 | 89 |
| Field Goals | 31-75 | 36-78 |
| Field Goal % | 41.3% | 46.2% |
| Three-Pointers | 11-34 | 7-29 |
| Three-Point % | 32.4% | 24.1% |
| Free Throws | 13-16 | 5-11 |
| Free Throw % | 81.3% | 45.5% |
| Rebounds | 38 | 42 |
| Assists | 16 | 21 |
| Turnovers | 10 | 15 |
| Steals | 10 | 4 |
| Blocks | 4 | 10 |
| Offensive Rebounds | 11 | 15 |
| Defensive Rebounds | 27 | 27 |
| Personal Fouls | 18 | 23 |
The official NBA box score confirms Denver’s 31-for-75 shooting, 11-for-34 three-point shooting, and 13-for-16 free-throw performance. Toronto shot 36-for-78 overall but made only 7 of 29 attempts from three-point range and 5 of 11 free throws.
That contrast is central to understanding the result.
Toronto was more efficient from the field overall, but Denver generated significantly more value from outside the arc and at the foul line. The Nuggets also committed five fewer turnovers and produced six more steals. Those extra possessions helped offset Toronto’s rebounding advantage.
Final Score and Quarter-by-Quarter Breakdown
The game followed a clear four-quarter pattern.
First Quarter: Toronto Starts Fast
Toronto opened the game with a 29-23 advantage.
The Raptors were effective attacking the interior and finished the period with the lead despite Denver’s ability to create perimeter opportunities. Toronto’s overall strength around the basket became a recurring theme throughout the game.
The six-point lead was not enough to establish control, though. Denver remained within striking distance and had several players contributing offensively.
Second Quarter: Denver Levels the Game
The second quarter was where Denver began changing the rhythm.
The Nuggets scored 24 points while limiting Toronto to 18. That six-point swing completely erased the Raptors’ first-quarter advantage.
At halftime, the score was tied 47-47.
This was important because Denver entered the locker room having survived Toronto’s strongest opening period. The game effectively became a new contest after halftime.
Third Quarter: The Deciding Stretch
The third quarter was the most important period of the game.
Denver scored 30 points.
Toronto scored 20.
That 10-point difference gave Denver a 77-67 advantage entering the fourth quarter. According to the NBA’s official recap, the Nuggets’ third-quarter performance created the 10-point cushion that ultimately decided the game.
This is the biggest tactical takeaway from the matchup. Toronto had better overall field-goal accuracy, but Denver produced its best basketball during the most important momentum swing.
Fourth Quarter: Toronto Responds, But Too Late
Toronto did not collapse.
The Raptors scored 22 points in the fourth quarter compared with Denver’s 19. That reduced the margin slightly, but Denver’s third-quarter advantage remained intact.
The final score settled at 96-89.
The Raptors demonstrated enough offensive resistance to make the closing minutes competitive, but the Nuggets had already created too much separation.
Jahmi’us Ramsey Leads Denver
Jahmi’us Ramsey was the standout player of the game.
He finished with 20 points, 8 rebounds, 1 assist, 2 steals and 1 turnover while shooting an extraordinary 9-for-9 from the field. He also made both of his three-point attempts.
That 9-for-9 performance is arguably the most striking individual statistic from the game.
Ramsey did not need a high number of attempts to become Denver’s leading scorer. Instead, he converted every field-goal attempt he took. His scoring efficiency helped Denver maintain offensive pressure without requiring excessive possessions.
His eight rebounds were also significant. Denver finished with only 38 rebounds compared with Toronto’s 42, so Ramsey’s individual work on the glass helped compensate for the team-level disadvantage.
The official NBA recap specifically highlighted Ramsey’s 20-point performance and noted that he scored those 20 points on 9-for-9 shooting.
Mark Sears Provides Denver’s Secondary Creation
Mark Sears finished with 17 points and 6 assists.
His scoring was not as efficient as Ramsey’s, as Sears went 2-for-11 from the field, but he made up for that shooting night by converting all seven of his free throws and creating opportunities for teammates.
His six assists were the most on Denver.
This distinction matters when looking beyond the scoring column. A player can have a difficult shooting night while still influencing the offense through passing, ball handling, and free-throw generation.
Sears also finished with a team-best plus-minus of +10, according to the official box score.
Denver’s victory therefore was not simply a Ramsey scoring story. Ramsey provided elite efficiency, while Sears supplied secondary playmaking and free-throw production.
Denver’s Other Important Contributors
Denver received meaningful scoring from several additional players.
Erik Stevenson scored 12 points, while Matthew Murrell also finished with 12. Efe Abogidi added 11 points in only 14:21 of playing time.
Stevenson shot 4-for-10 overall and made two three-pointers. Murrell contributed two three-pointers of his own and made both free-throw attempts.
Abogidi was particularly efficient, going 5-for-8 from the field for 11 points. He also recorded four rebounds, one assist, and one block.
Denver therefore had five players in double figures:
- Jahmi’us Ramsey: 20 points
- Mark Sears: 17 points
- Erik Stevenson: 12 points
- Matthew Murrell: 12 points
- Efe Abogidi: 11 points
That balanced scoring distribution reduced Denver’s dependence on one scorer.
Toronto’s Leading Scorers
Toronto’s scoring was led by Nimari Burnett with 15 points.
Burnett also collected nine rebounds, making him one of Toronto’s most productive all-around players. He shot 5-for-12 from the field and contributed two steals.
Malik Thomas added 13 points on 6-for-14 shooting.
Toronto also received 10 points from Benjamin Angel and six points apiece from Amir Hoggard and Aziz Bandaogo.
The scoring distribution was less balanced than Denver’s. Toronto had only three players reach double figures, while Denver had five.
That difference was meaningful in a game decided by only seven points.
Amir Hoggard’s Playmaking Was Important
One correction is important when reviewing the supplied statistics.
The official NBA box score lists Amir Hoggard with 9 assists, not Nate Bittle. Hoggard played 19:01 and finished with six points, nine assists, two steals, one rebound, one turnover, and a minus-seven plus-minus.
Nate Bittle was listed as DNP in the official box score.
Hoggard’s nine assists explain why Toronto finished with 21 team assists despite not having a large number of double-digit scorers.
His passing was one of the clearest examples of Toronto creating offense beyond individual scoring totals.
Toronto Won the Rebounding Battle
One of the more surprising elements of the game is that Toronto lost despite controlling the glass.
The Raptors finished with 42 rebounds, compared with Denver’s 38.
Toronto also grabbed 15 offensive rebounds, four more than Denver’s 11.
Offensive rebounding is normally a strong indicator of additional scoring opportunities. Toronto repeatedly gave itself second chances.
Yet the Raptors could not turn that advantage into enough efficient scoring.
This is where the difference between raw volume and efficiency becomes important.
Toronto had more attempts and more rebounds, but Denver converted its opportunities more effectively from three-point range and the free-throw line.
Denver Won the Turnover Battle
Denver committed 10 turnovers.
Toronto committed 15.
That five-turnover difference gave Denver an important possession advantage.
The Nuggets also recorded 10 steals, compared with Toronto’s four. The combination of fewer turnovers and more steals helped Denver win the possession battle even though Toronto dominated offensive rebounding.
In a seven-point game, five additional turnovers can have a substantial effect.
This is one of the strongest reasons not to evaluate the contest solely through field-goal percentage.
Three-Point Shooting Changed the Game
The biggest statistical advantage for Denver came from three-point shooting.
Denver made 11 of 34 attempts from deep.
Toronto made only 7 of 29.
The percentages were 32.4% for Denver and 24.1% for Toronto.
That meant Denver made four more three-pointers.
Those additional made threes accounted for 12 points.
Toronto’s overall field-goal percentage was actually better, but the Nuggets received greater value from their perimeter possessions.
This is a useful lesson when analyzing Summer League box scores. A team can shoot a higher overall field-goal percentage and still lose because its opponent generates more efficient scoring from three-point range and the free-throw line.
Free Throws Gave Denver Another Advantage
Denver also had a major advantage at the foul line.
The Nuggets made 13 of 16 free throws for 81.3%.
Toronto made only 5 of 11 for 45.5%.
That produced an eight-point difference in made free throws.
Combined with Denver’s four additional three-pointers, the scoring-value advantage from outside shooting and free throws was substantial.
Mark Sears was especially important here. He made all seven of his free throws despite shooting only 2-for-11 from the field.
This is why his 17-point total should not be judged only by his field-goal percentage.
Toronto Had the Better Overall Field-Goal Percentage
Toronto shot 46.2% from the field.
Denver shot 41.3%.
At first glance, that appears to favor Toronto strongly.
But basketball games are not decided by field-goal percentage alone.
Denver compensated with:
- Four more made three-pointers
- Eight more made free throws
- Five fewer turnovers
- Six more steals
- Five double-digit scorers
- A decisive 30-point third quarter
Toronto compensated for its shooting profile with offensive rebounds, interior scoring, and passing.
Ultimately, Denver’s strengths were more valuable in the final score.
The Defensive Numbers Tell Another Story
Toronto recorded 10 blocks.
Denver recorded four.
That is a huge six-block difference.
Toronto’s rim protection helped explain its strong overall field-goal percentage and its ability to challenge Denver’s interior attempts.
However, Denver’s 10 steals helped offset Toronto’s shot-blocking advantage.
The Nuggets were more disruptive in passing lanes and forced Toronto into 15 turnovers.
The contrast is interesting:
Toronto’s defense was stronger around the rim. Denver’s defense was more effective at generating turnovers.
Neither approach was universally superior. Denver’s approach simply produced enough extra possessions to help secure the win.
What the Game Says About Denver’s Offensive Structure
One of the most useful insights from the matchup is the value of scoring depth.
Denver had five double-digit scorers.
Ramsey was the headline performer, but he was not carrying the entire offensive workload.
Sears supplied playmaking.
Stevenson and Murrell provided perimeter scoring.
Abogidi delivered efficient interior production.
That variety made it difficult for Toronto to shut down Denver through a single defensive adjustment.
The Nuggets also demonstrated an ability to respond after a poor start. Falling behind 29-23 in the opening quarter did not cause the offense to become rushed. Denver gradually improved and then exploded in the third.
<b>What the Game Says About Toronto
Toronto’s performance had several positive elements despite the loss.
The Raptors shot 46.2% overall.
- They won the rebounding battle.
- They collected 15 offensive rebounds.
- They recorded 21 assists.
- They blocked 10 shots.
Those are not the numbers of a team that was simply outplayed from start to finish.
The problem was efficiency in the areas that often decide close games.
Toronto’s 24.1% three-point shooting limited its ability to punish Denver from the perimeter. Its 45.5% free-throw shooting left points at the line. Its 15 turnovers created additional opportunities for Denver.
That combination made the seven-point loss understandable even with several statistical advantages.
Head-to-Head Statistical Comparison
For readers analyzing the denver nuggets vs toronto raptors match player stats, the most useful approach is to compare categories rather than focusing on the final score alone.
Scoring
Denver won 96-89.
The Nuggets had five double-digit scorers, while Toronto had three.
Shooting
Toronto had the better overall field-goal percentage.
Denver had the better three-point percentage.
Free Throws
Denver was substantially better at the line.
Rebounding
Toronto won the overall rebounding battle 42-38.
Offensive Rebounding
Toronto won 15-11.
Playmaking
Toronto finished with 21 assists compared with Denver’s 16.
Ball Security
Denver committed 10 turnovers compared with Toronto’s 15.
Defensive Disruption
Denver recorded 10 steals.
Toronto recorded four steals and 10 blocks.
The result demonstrates why a box score needs to be read as a complete statistical profile rather than a collection of isolated numbers.
Most Important Player Stats at a Glance
| Player | Team | Key Production |
| Jahmi’us Ramsey | Denver | 20 PTS, 8 REB, 9-9 FG |
| Mark Sears | Denver | 17 PTS, 6 AST, 7-7 FT |
| Erik Stevenson | Denver | 12 PTS, 4 REB |
| Matthew Murrell | Denver | 12 PTS |
| Efe Abogidi | Denver | 11 PTS, 4 REB |
| Nimari Burnett | Toronto | 15 PTS, 9 REB |
| Malik Thomas | Toronto | 13 PTS |
| Benjamin Angel | Toronto | 10 PTS |
| Amir Hoggard | Toronto | 6 PTS, 9 AST |
| Aziz Bandaogo | Toronto | 6 PTS, 8 REB, 6 BLK |
The figures above are based on the official NBA box score.
Why Jahmi’us Ramsey’s 9-for-9 Night Matters
A 9-for-9 shooting performance deserves special attention because efficiency at that level is unusual even in Summer League basketball.
Ramsey did not simply score 20 points. He scored them without missing a field-goal attempt.
He made both of his three-point attempts as well.
His only missed shot came at the free-throw line, where he went 0-for-1.
That means his field-goal efficiency was perfect while his scoring output still reached 20 points.
For player evaluation, this type of performance is useful because it demonstrates the ability to convert limited opportunities at an extremely high rate. It should not automatically be treated as evidence of sustainable 100% shooting, but it is certainly the most memorable individual statistical performance from this matchup.
Why Mark Sears Still Had a Strong Game
Sears presents the opposite analytical example.
His 2-for-11 field-goal shooting was inefficient.
Yet he finished with 17 points because he made seven free throws and created six assists.
His plus-10 was also the best mark among Denver players in the official box score.
This is a good reminder that individual player evaluation should include more than scoring efficiency.
A guard who creates six assists, gets to the free-throw line seven times, and helps his team control the game can have a major impact even when the jumper is not falling.
Why Toronto’s Rebounding Advantage Was Not Enough
Toronto’s 42-38 rebounding advantage is significant.
The 15 offensive rebounds are even more notable.
But additional possessions only matter if they are converted efficiently.
Toronto struggled from three-point range and the free-throw line.
The Raptors therefore created extra opportunities without consistently turning those opportunities into efficient points.
Denver did not dominate the glass, but the Nuggets made better use of key scoring opportunities.
That is one of the clearest lessons from the matchup.
Summer League Context Matters
These were not regular-season NBA rotations.
Summer League games are designed in part to evaluate young players, prospects, two-way candidates, fringe roster players, and developing talent. Playing time, lineups, roles, and responsibilities can differ significantly from an established NBA rotation.
That context is important when interpreting individual numbers.
A player scoring 20 points in Summer League should not automatically be compared directly with a 20-point regular-season performance.
The more useful question is what the player demonstrated while producing those numbers.
- For Ramsey, the answer was elite shot conversion and rebounding.
- For Sears, it was playmaking and foul-drawing ability.
- For Hoggard, it was passing.
- For Bandaogo, it was rim protection.
These individual details provide more useful information than the raw scoring totals alone.
Game Details
The official NBA record lists the matchup as a 2026 NBA Summer League consolation game at Thomas & Mack Center in Las Vegas.
Denver finished Summer League with a 3-2 record.
Toronto also finished 3-2.
The game was televised on ESPN2 and NBA TV Canada. The listed officials were Kastine Evans, Erica Parker, and Carlos Peralta-Ortega.
For readers in Pakistan, the game appeared in the early hours of July 20 because the Las Vegas game was played on the evening of July 19 local time.
What Fans Should Take From the Box Score
The final score gives only the beginning of the story.
The deeper statistical picture shows a Denver team that:
- Recovered from an early deficit.
- Exploded for 30 points in the third quarter.
- Made four more three-pointers than Toronto.
- Converted 81.3% of its free throws.
- Committed five fewer turnovers.
- Produced 10 steals.
- Received double-digit scoring from five players.
Toronto, meanwhile:
- Shot better overall from the field.
- Won the rebounding battle.
- Grabbed 15 offensive rebounds.
- Produced 21 assists.
- Blocked 10 shots.
- Received nine assists from Amir Hoggard.
- Struggled from three-point range and the free-throw line.
Those contrasting strengths explain how Denver could win despite losing several traditional box-score categories.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who led the Denver Nuggets in scoring against the Toronto Raptors?
Jahmi’us Ramsey led Denver with 20 points. He shot a perfect 9-for-9 from the field and made both of his three-point attempts.
Who led the Toronto Raptors in scoring?
Nimari Burnett led Toronto with 15 points. He also grabbed nine rebounds.
What was the final score between Denver and Toronto?
The Denver Nuggets defeated the Toronto Raptors 96-89 in the 2026 NBA Summer League consolation game.
Who had the most assists in the game?
Amir Hoggard recorded nine assists for Toronto, while Mark Sears led Denver with six assists.
Which team had more rebounds?
Toronto had more rebounds, finishing with 42 compared with Denver’s 38. The Raptors also had 15 offensive rebounds.
Why did Denver win despite Toronto shooting better overall?
Denver compensated for Toronto’s superior overall field-goal percentage by making more three-pointers, shooting much better from the free-throw line, committing fewer turnovers, and producing more steals. Denver also outscored Toronto 30-20 in the third quarter, which created the decisive advantage.
Conclusion
The denver nuggets vs toronto raptors match player stats provide a strong example of why basketball analysis needs to go beyond one number.
Toronto had several statistical advantages. The Raptors shot 46.2% from the field, collected 42 rebounds, grabbed 15 offensive boards, recorded 21 assists, and blocked 10 shots. Yet Denver found more value in three-point shooting, free-throw accuracy, ball security, and defensive pressure.
Jahmi’us Ramsey was the defining individual performer with 20 points on a perfect 9-for-9 from the field. Mark Sears added 17 points and six assists, while Denver received double-digit scoring from three other players. Toronto’s leading scorer was Nimari Burnett with 15 points, while Amir Hoggard’s nine assists highlighted the Raptors’ playmaking.
The decisive moment was Denver’s third quarter. After entering halftime tied at 47-47, the Nuggets scored 30 points and held Toronto to 20. That 10-point swing created the cushion Denver needed to withstand Toronto’s fourth-quarter response.
Ultimately, the denver nuggets vs toronto raptors match player stats show a close and competitive Summer League matchup in which Denver’s efficiency in key scoring areas overcame Toronto’s advantages in shooting percentage, rebounding, assists, and rim protection.
