Chicago Bears vs Philadelphia Eagles Match Player Stats

The Chicago Bears vs Philadelphia Eagles Match Player Stats from November 29, 2025 tell the story of a game that was decided by more than passing yards, defensive pressure, or individual star performances. The Chicago Bears defeated the Philadelphia Eagles 24-15 in a road victory that highlighted the importance of balance, rushing efficiency, late-game execution, and the ability to make the most of scoring opportunities.

Chicago entered the game with a 9-3 record and a 5-2 record away from home. Philadelphia stood at 8-4 with a strong 4-2 record at home. On paper, the matchup featured two talented teams with playoff-level ambitions. On the field, however, Chicago’s ground attack became the defining factor.

The final score does not tell the entire story. Philadelphia quarterback Jalen Hurts threw for more yards than Chicago quarterback Caleb Williams. Eagles receiver A.J. Brown produced the game’s most dominant receiving performance. Philadelphia also recorded more total tackles and created more quarterback pressure.

Yet Chicago won because the Bears controlled one of football’s most important areas: the running game.

The Bears rushed for an extraordinary 281 yards on 47 carries and scored two rushing touchdowns. Kyle Monangai and D’Andre Swift both surpassed 100 rushing yards, giving Chicago a level of offensive balance that Philadelphia could not match. The Bears then added 14 points in the fourth quarter to turn a competitive game into a significant road victory.

This article provides a detailed breakdown of the player statistics, team performances, key turning points, and the numbers that mattered most in the Chicago Bears vs Philadelphia Eagles game.

Game Summary

Chicago Bears 24, Philadelphia Eagles 15

Date: November 29, 2025

Chicago Bears record after the game: 9-3

Philadelphia Eagles record after the game: 8-4

Venue situation: Chicago played on the road, while Philadelphia played at home.

The Bears opened the game strongly, scoring seven points in the first quarter. Philadelphia was held scoreless during the opening period. Chicago added three more points before halftime, taking a 10-3 lead into the break.

The Eagles showed more resistance during the second half. Philadelphia scored six points in the third quarter and another six in the fourth. However, Chicago produced its best scoring period late in the game, adding 14 fourth-quarter points.

Quarter-by-Quarter Score

Quarter	Chicago Bears	Philadelphia Eagles
First Quarter	7	0
Second Quarter	3	3
Third Quarter	0	6
Fourth Quarter	14	6
Final	24	15

The final quarter was particularly important. Chicago and Philadelphia both entered the final stages of the game with the result still competitive. The Bears responded with two touchdowns in the fourth quarter, creating the separation needed to secure the 24-15 victory.

Chicago Bears vs Philadelphia Eagles Match Player Stats Overview

The most important contrast in this matchup appeared in the distribution of offensive production.

Philadelphia generated more production through the passing game, led by Jalen Hurts and A.J. Brown. Chicago, however, created its advantage through a powerful and highly productive rushing attack.

Key Statistical Leaders

Chicago Bears

• Caleb Williams: 17 completions on 36 attempts, 154 yards, 1 touchdown, 1 interception
• Kyle Monangai: 22 carries, 130 yards, 1 touchdown
• D’Andre Swift: 18 carries, 125 yards, 1 touchdown
• Cole Kmet: 3 receptions, 36 yards, 1 touchdown
• Kevin Byard: 6 tackles and 1 interception
• Jaquan Brisker: 6 tackles and 1 pass defended

Philadelphia Eagles

• Jalen Hurts: 19 completions on 34 attempts, 230 yards, 2 touchdowns, 1 interception
• Saquon Barkley: 13 carries, 56 yards
• A.J. Brown: 10 receptions, 132 yards, 2 touchdowns
• Reed Blankenship: 14 total tackles
• Nakobe Dean: 12 total tackles
• Jalyx Hunt: 1 interception for 11 return yards

The contrast is clear. Philadelphia’s leading offensive performances came through the air. Chicago’s most valuable offensive performances came on the ground.

That difference became the foundation of the final result.

Caleb Williams Passing Statistics

Caleb Williams completed 17 of 36 passes for 154 yards, one touchdown, and one interception. He was also sacked twice for a loss of 10 yards.

His passing line was not dominant from a volume perspective, but the Bears did not need him to carry the entire offense through the air.

Caleb Williams Stat Line

Statistic	Total
Completions	17
Attempts	36
Passing Yards	154
Passing Touchdowns	1
Interceptions	1
Sacks	2
Sack Yards Lost	10
QBR	49.4
Passer Rating	56.9

The most important part of evaluating Williams’ performance is understanding the context of Chicago’s offensive approach.

The Bears ran the ball 47 times. When a team produces 281 rushing yards, the quarterback does not necessarily need to throw for 300 yards to control the game. Williams’ responsibility was to operate within an offense that had established a major advantage on the ground.

His touchdown pass to Cole Kmet added an important passing dimension and prevented Chicago’s offense from becoming completely predictable.

Williams also contributed five rushing attempts for 13 yards. While those numbers were not large, quarterback movement can still influence defensive alignment and help create uncertainty in the running game.

The statistical lesson from his performance is simple: quarterback success is not always measured by high passing totals. In this game, Chicago needed efficient decision-making and complementary offense more than a high-volume passing performance.

Jalen Hurts Passing Statistics

Jalen Hurts completed 19 of 34 passes for 230 yards, two touchdowns, and one interception. He was not sacked during the game.

Jalen Hurts Stat Line

Statistic	Total
Completions	19
Attempts	34
Passing Yards	230
Passing Touchdowns	2
Interceptions	1
Sacks	0
QBR	16.3
Passer Rating	84.2

Hurts produced more passing yards and more passing touchdowns than Williams. He also avoided being sacked.

However, football games are not won by one quarterback statistic alone.

Philadelphia struggled to create enough support around the passing attack. The Eagles rushed for only 87 yards as a team, while Chicago rushed for 281.

That difference gave the Bears greater control over the offensive rhythm.

Hurts also lost a fumble during the game. Turnovers and lost possessions can become especially costly when a team is already struggling to establish a balanced offensive attack.

His connection with A.J. Brown was the most productive part of Philadelphia’s offense. Brown caught 10 passes for 132 yards and two touchdowns, accounting for a major percentage of the Eagles’ offensive success.

Despite those numbers, Philadelphia could not generate enough consistent production elsewhere to overcome Chicago’s rushing advantage.

Chicago’s Historic-Level Ground Control

The biggest story in the Chicago Bears vs Philadelphia Eagles Match Player Stats was the Bears’ rushing performance.

Chicago rushed 47 times for 281 yards and scored two rushing touchdowns.

That is an average of nearly six yards per rushing attempt.

More importantly, Chicago had two different running backs exceed 100 rushing yards.

Kyle Monangai rushed for 130 yards and a touchdown. D’Andre Swift added 125 yards and a touchdown.

This type of production is difficult for any defense to overcome.

Chicago Bears Team Rushing

Player	Carries	Rushing Yards	Touchdowns	Long
Kyle Monangai	22	130	1	31
D’Andre Swift	18	125	1	23
Caleb Williams	5	13	0	Not listed
DJ Moore	1	10	0	Not listed
Luther Burden III	1	3	0	Not listed
Team Total	47	281	2	Not applicable

The Bears did not rely on a single explosive run to build their rushing total. The distribution between Monangai and Swift suggests sustained success throughout the game.

A defense can sometimes contain one running back by adjusting personnel and committing additional defenders to that player. Facing two productive runners creates a more difficult problem.

Chicago could rotate its offensive threats while maintaining a physical identity.

Kyle Monangai Leads the Bears’ Ground Attack

Kyle Monangai delivered the most productive rushing performance of the game.

He carried the ball 22 times for 130 yards and scored one touchdown. His longest run covered 31 yards.

A 22-carry workload also shows that Chicago trusted him with a significant portion of the offensive responsibility.

His production was valuable for several reasons.

First, he created positive yardage consistently enough to help the Bears maintain offensive momentum.

Second, his 31-yard long run demonstrated that Philadelphia could not simply expect short gains.

Third, his touchdown directly contributed to Chicago’s scoring total.

A running back’s value is often more than the final rushing total. Productive rushing also changes the game for the entire offense. It can reduce the number of difficult passing situations and force defenders to respect play-action possibilities.

Monangai’s 130 yards were therefore part of a broader offensive structure that helped Chicago dictate the game.

D’Andre Swift Adds 125 Rushing Yards

D’Andre Swift nearly matched Monangai’s production.

Swift carried the ball 18 times for 125 yards and scored one touchdown. His longest run went for 23 yards.

He also added one reception for 13 yards.

D’Andre Swift’s Total Contribution

Category	Statistic
Rushing Attempts	18
Rushing Yards	125
Rushing Touchdowns	1
Longest Rush	23
Receptions	1
Receiving Yards	13

The combination of Monangai and Swift was the defining strength of the Chicago offense.

Together, they produced 255 rushing yards and two rushing touchdowns.

That is an exceptional amount of production from two players in one game.

Philadelphia’s defense was able to generate two sacks, two tackles for loss, seven passes defended, and six quarterback hits. Yet despite those positive defensive statistics, the Eagles could not consistently stop the Bears on the ground.

That is an important lesson when analyzing football statistics. Defensive pressure numbers can look impressive, but the most important question is whether a defense actually prevents the opponent from sustaining offense and scoring points.

In this matchup, Chicago’s rushing production had the greater impact.

Philadelphia’s Rushing Attack Could Not Match Chicago

Philadelphia’s rushing offense was significantly less productive.

The Eagles finished with 17 rushing attempts for 87 yards.

Saquon Barkley led the team with 13 carries for 56 yards. Jalen Hurts added four carries for 31 yards.

Philadelphia Eagles Rushing Statistics

Player	Carries	Rushing Yards
Saquon Barkley	13	56
Jalen Hurts	4	31
Team Total	17	87

The difference in rushing volume was especially important.

Chicago had 47 rushing attempts.

Philadelphia had 17.

That means the Bears ran the ball 30 more times than the Eagles.

This affected several aspects of the game.

• Chicago was able to keep the offense balanced.
• Chicago could use the running game to maintain possession.
• Chicago could reduce pressure on its quarterback.
• Chicago could continue attacking physically late in the game.

Philadelphia, meanwhile, became more dependent on passing production.

When a team lacks rushing balance, its offense can become easier to predict in key situations.

The Bears’ defense did not record a sack, but Chicago still limited Philadelphia’s ground game enough to prevent the Eagles from matching the Bears’ offensive balance.

A.J. Brown Delivers a Dominant Receiving Performance

A.J. Brown was Philadelphia’s most productive offensive player.

He caught 10 passes for 132 yards and scored two touchdowns.

A.J. Brown Stat Line

Statistic	Total
Receptions	10
Receiving Yards	132
Touchdowns	2

Brown was responsible for both of Philadelphia’s passing touchdowns.

His performance represented a major share of the Eagles’ total offensive production.

The numbers also highlight an interesting contrast within the game.

Philadelphia had the most dominant individual receiver.

Chicago had the more dominant overall rushing attack.

In the final result, the balanced team performance was more important than the standout receiving total.

Brown’s 132 yards demonstrate that Philadelphia’s offense was capable of creating explosive and productive passing moments. However, the Eagles were unable to translate that production into enough points to overcome Chicago.

DeVonta Smith and the Supporting Eagles Receivers

DeVonta Smith finished with five receptions for 48 yards.

Dallas Goedert caught two passes for 27 yards.

Jahan Dotson added one reception for 12 yards.

Will Shipley caught one pass for 11 yards.

Philadelphia Receiving Statistics

Player	Receptions	Yards	Touchdowns
A.J. Brown	10	132	2
DeVonta Smith	5	48	0
Dallas Goedert	2	27	0
Jahan Dotson	1	12	0
Will Shipley	1	11	0
Team Total	19	230	2

Philadelphia’s passing game was concentrated heavily around Brown and Smith.

Brown alone accounted for more than half of the Eagles’ receiving yards.

While Smith provided a useful secondary option, Philadelphia did not create enough production from the rest of the receiving group to generate sustained offensive balance.

The Eagles also scored only 15 points despite producing 230 passing yards.

That difference between yardage and scoring is important. Teams can move the ball successfully but still lose if they struggle to convert drives into touchdowns and fail to maximize scoring opportunities.

Cole Kmet Leads Chicago’s Receiving Group

Cole Kmet led Chicago with three receptions for 36 yards and one touchdown.

His yardage total was not large, but his touchdown made his contribution especially important.

Chicago Bears Receiving Statistics

Player	Receptions	Yards	Touchdowns
Cole Kmet	3	36	1
Luther Burden III	4	33	0
Colston Loveland	3	28	0
Olamide Zaccheaus	2	19	0
DJ Moore	2	17	0
D’Andre Swift	1	13	0
Rome Odunze	2	8	0
Team Total	17	154	1

Chicago’s receiving production was spread across several players.

No player reached 40 receiving yards.

At first glance, that may appear unusual for a winning team. But the Bears did not need a dominant receiver because their running game carried such a large portion of the offense.

The distribution also showed that Williams was not dependent on one receiver.

Luther Burden III led the team with four receptions, while Kmet, Colston Loveland, and others contributed important plays.

This kind of offensive distribution can make a team more difficult to defend when combined with a successful rushing attack.

The Turnover Battle

Both teams recorded interceptions.

Kevin Byard intercepted Jalen Hurts for Chicago.

Jalyx Hunt intercepted Caleb Williams and returned the ball 11 yards for Philadelphia.

Philadelphia also had a lost fumble from Hurts.

Turnover Summary

Chicago

• Kevin Byard: 1 interception
• Nahshon Wright: 1 fumble recovery

Philadelphia

• Jalyx Hunt: 1 interception, 11 return yards
• Jalen Hurts: 1 fumble and 1 lost fumble
• Britain Covey: 1 fumble and 1 recovery

Turnovers often become decisive in close games.

Chicago’s ability to take the ball away from Hurts while limiting the damage from its own interception helped the Bears maintain control.

The lost fumble by Hurts was particularly costly because Philadelphia was already facing a deficit in the rushing battle.

A team can sometimes survive one weakness. It becomes much harder when limited rushing production is combined with turnovers and missed scoring opportunities.

Kevin Byard Makes an Important Defensive Impact

Kevin Byard delivered one of Chicago’s strongest defensive performances.

He recorded six total tackles, including four solo tackles, and added one pass defended and one interception.

Kevin Byard’s Defensive Numbers

Statistic	Total
Total Tackles	6
Solo Tackles	4
Passes Defended	1
Interceptions	1
Interception Return Yards	0

His interception was one of the most important defensive plays of the game.

Byard’s performance shows why defensive statistics must be evaluated beyond tackle totals. A player can have fewer tackles than another defender but still make a more decisive impact through a turnover.

In a game where Chicago’s defense recorded zero sacks, the ability to create an interception became even more valuable.

Jaquan Brisker Leads Chicago in All-Around Defense

Jaquan Brisker finished with six total tackles, five solo tackles, and one pass defended.

His six tackles matched Kevin Byard for the Chicago team lead.

Jaquan Brisker’s Stat Line

Statistic	Total
Total Tackles	6
Solo Tackles	5
Passes Defended	1

Chicago’s defensive unit recorded 47 total tackles and 27 solo tackles.

The Bears also finished with:

• 0 sacks
• 1 tackle for loss
• 3 passes defended
• 1 quarterback hit
• 1 interception

These numbers demonstrate an interesting defensive profile.

Chicago did not dominate Philadelphia through pass rushing.

Instead, the Bears made enough plays to limit the Eagles’ scoring while their offense controlled the game on the ground.

This is another reminder that a defense does not always need a large sack total to help a team win.

Reed Blankenship Leads the Eagles in Tackles

Reed Blankenship recorded an outstanding 14 total tackles and eight solo tackles.

He was Philadelphia’s leading tackler.

Reed Blankenship’s Stat Line

Statistic	Total
Total Tackles	14
Solo Tackles	8

Nakobe Dean also had a highly active game with 12 total tackles, five solo tackles, and one pass defended.

Jordan Davis added nine total tackles, including five solo stops.

Philadelphia’s Leading Defensive Players

Player	Total Tackles	Solo Tackles	Additional Contribution
Reed Blankenship	14	8	Team-leading tackling performance
Nakobe Dean	12	5	1 pass defended
Jordan Davis	9	5	Strong presence against the run
Jalyx Hunt	Not listed in totals provided	Not listed	1 interception, 11 return yards

Philadelphia finished with 84 total tackles and 45 solo tackles.

The Eagles also recorded:

• 2 sacks
• 2 tackles for loss
• 7 passes defended
• 6 quarterback hits

These are active defensive numbers.

However, the Bears’ 281 rushing yards reveal the central problem. Philadelphia made many tackles because Chicago repeatedly ran the ball successfully and generated significant offensive volume.

A high tackle total does not always indicate defensive dominance. Sometimes it can reflect the number of plays a defense was forced to handle.

Why Chicago Won Despite Fewer Passing Yards

This is the most important analytical question from the game.

Philadelphia passed for 230 yards.

Chicago passed for 154 yards.

Jalen Hurts threw two touchdowns.

Caleb Williams threw one touchdown.

A.J. Brown had 132 receiving yards and two touchdowns.

Yet Chicago won 24-15.

The answer is found in the overall balance of the game.

Chicago’s Major Advantages

Rushing production

Chicago: 281 rushing yards

Philadelphia: 87 rushing yards

Rushing volume

Chicago: 47 attempts

Philadelphia: 17 attempts

Rushing touchdowns

Chicago: 2

Philadelphia: 0

Late-game scoring

Chicago scored 14 points in the fourth quarter.

Philadelphia scored six.

Turnover opportunities

Chicago recorded an interception and recovered a fumble.

Philadelphia recorded an interception, but also lost a fumble.

Chicago’s ability to dominate the running game gave the Bears a stronger overall offensive foundation.

Philadelphia had a better passing performance statistically, but the Eagles could not compensate for the massive difference on the ground.

The Fourth Quarter Decided the Game

Chicago’s 14 fourth-quarter points were the most important scoring burst of the game.

Philadelphia had spent the second half attempting to close the gap.

The Eagles scored six points in the third quarter and another six in the fourth.

But Chicago responded with two fourth-quarter touchdowns.

That final-quarter execution separated the teams.

The ability to run the ball effectively becomes especially valuable late in games. A successful rushing attack can help a team control the clock, maintain possession, and reduce the opponent’s opportunities.

Chicago’s 47 rushing attempts suggest a commitment to that physical approach throughout the game.

The Bears did not simply rely on a quick start. They maintained enough offensive control to finish strongly when the game entered its most important phase.

Special Teams Statistics

Special teams also played a role in the overall field-position battle.

Chicago Bears Kicking

Cairo Santos made his only field-goal attempt.

His longest field goal was 30 yards.

He also made all three extra-point attempts.

Cairo Santos Statistics

Statistic	Total
Field Goals Made	1
Field Goals Attempted	1
Longest Field Goal	30 yards
Extra Points Made	3
Extra Points Attempted	3
Total Points	6

Philadelphia Eagles Kicking

Jake Elliott made one of two field-goal attempts.

His longest made field goal was 44 yards.

He missed the Eagles’ only extra-point attempt.

Jake Elliott Statistics

Statistic	Total
Field Goals Made	1
Field Goals Attempted	2
Longest Field Goal	44 yards
Extra Points Made	0
Extra Points Attempted	1
Total Points	3

In a nine-point game, missed kicks can become part of the larger story.

Philadelphia’s missed field-goal opportunity and missed extra point contributed to the difference between yardage production and the final score.

Punting and Field Position

Tory Taylor punted three times for Chicago.

He totaled 127 yards, averaging 42.3 yards per punt. One of his punts was placed inside the 20-yard line, and his longest punt traveled 51 yards.

Braden Mann punted five times for Philadelphia.

He totaled 245 yards, averaging 49.0 yards per punt. He had one touchback, one punt inside the 20-yard line, and a longest punt of 63 yards.

Punting Comparison

Player	Punts	Total Yards	Average	Inside 20	Long
Tory Taylor	3	127	42.3	1	51
Braden Mann	5	245	49.0	1	63

Philadelphia punting more often also reflects the larger offensive flow of the game.

Chicago’s rushing success helped the Bears sustain drives and reduced the number of times they needed to give the ball back.

Return Game Statistics

Josh Blackwell handled Chicago’s kick returns.

He returned two kicks for 58 yards, averaging 29.0 yards per return. His longest return went for 34 yards.

Devin Duvernay added a 12-yard punt return.

For Philadelphia, Will Shipley returned two kicks for 47 yards. Britain Covey added one kick return for 22 yards and a nine-yard punt return.

Chicago Return Statistics

• Josh Blackwell: 2 kick returns, 58 yards, 29.0 average, 34 long
• Devin Duvernay: 1 punt return, 12 yards

Philadelphia Return Statistics

• Will Shipley: 2 kick returns, 47 yards
• Britain Covey: 1 kick return, 22 yards
• Britain Covey: 1 punt return, 9 yards

While no return touchdown changed the game, field position remains important in close NFL matchups.

Every successful return can reduce the distance an offense must travel to reach scoring range.

Three Numbers That Explain the Bears’ Victory

If only three numbers were used to explain this game, they would be these:

281

Chicago’s total rushing yards.

This was the foundation of the Bears’ victory.

The Bears averaged close to six yards per carry and received more than 100 rushing yards from two different players.

47

Chicago’s total rushing attempts.

This reflects commitment, control, and offensive balance.

The Bears did not abandon their strongest offensive strategy.

14

Chicago’s fourth-quarter points.

Late-game execution turned a competitive matchup into a 24-15 victory.

Together, these three numbers explain the result more effectively than passing yard totals alone.

Key Player Performances Ranked by Impact

1. Kyle Monangai

130 rushing yards and one touchdown on 22 carries.

Monangai was central to Chicago’s dominant rushing attack and provided both volume and scoring production.

2. D’Andre Swift

125 rushing yards and one touchdown on 18 carries.

Swift nearly matched Monangai’s production and ensured that Philadelphia could not focus its defense on one running back.

3. A.J. Brown

10 receptions, 132 yards, and two touchdowns.

Brown delivered the best individual receiving performance of the game and accounted for both Eagles receiving touchdowns.

4. Kevin Byard

Six tackles and one interception.

Byard contributed in coverage and created a critical turnover.

5. Jalen Hurts

230 passing yards and two touchdowns.

Hurts produced strong passing numbers but could not overcome Philadelphia’s limited rushing output and turnover problems.

6. Reed Blankenship

14 total tackles and eight solo tackles.

Blankenship was Philadelphia’s most active tackler during a difficult game for the Eagles’ run defense.

Lessons From the Match

The Chicago Bears vs Philadelphia Eagles matchup offers several useful football lessons.

A strong rushing attack changes everything

Chicago’s 281 rushing yards reduced the pressure on its passing game and helped the Bears control the overall offensive structure.

Individual stars do not always decide the winner

A.J. Brown had 132 yards and two touchdowns, but Philadelphia still lost.

Football is a team sport where overall balance often matters more than one exceptional individual performance.

Late-game scoring is critical

Chicago scored 14 points in the fourth quarter.

Those points created the final separation.

Passing yardage alone can be misleading

Philadelphia outpassed Chicago by 76 yards.

That did not overcome the Bears’ 194-yard advantage in team rushing.

Turnovers become more damaging when the offense lacks balance

Philadelphia’s lost fumble added pressure to an offense that was already heavily dependent on the passing game.

Final Analysis

The Chicago Bears earned their 24-15 victory by playing a more balanced and physically dominant game.

Caleb Williams did not need to produce a massive passing total because the Bears’ running game controlled the matchup.

Kyle Monangai and D’Andre Swift combined for 255 rushing yards and two touchdowns. Chicago finished with 281 rushing yards as a team on 47 carries.

Philadelphia’s passing offense had several strong moments.

Jalen Hurts threw for 230 yards and two touchdowns.

A.J. Brown produced 10 catches, 132 yards, and two touchdowns.

Yet the Eagles could not create enough balance on the ground. Their 87 rushing yards were far below Chicago’s total.

The Bears also made important defensive plays, including Kevin Byard’s interception and the team’s fumble recovery.

When the game reached the fourth quarter, Chicago delivered 14 points to secure the victory.

From a statistical perspective, this game is a strong example of why football analysis must go beyond passing yards and individual highlights.

• Philadelphia had the game’s leading passer in yardage.
• Philadelphia had the game’s leading receiver.
• Philadelphia recorded more total tackles and more quarterback pressure.

Chicago still won because the Bears controlled the line of scrimmage, dominated the rushing battle, created timely defensive plays, and finished stronger in the fourth quarter.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who won the Chicago Bears vs Philadelphia Eagles game on November 29, 2025?

The Chicago Bears defeated the Philadelphia Eagles 24-15.

Who had the most rushing yards in the game?

Kyle Monangai led all rushers with 130 yards and one touchdown on 22 carries.

How many rushing yards did D’Andre Swift have?

D’Andre Swift rushed for 125 yards and one touchdown on 18 carries.

Who led the game in receiving yards?

A.J. Brown led all receivers with 10 receptions for 132 yards and two touchdowns.

How many passing yards did Caleb Williams have?

Caleb Williams completed 17 of 36 passes for 154 yards, one touchdown, and one interception.

What was the biggest statistical difference in the game?

The rushing game was the biggest difference. Chicago rushed for 281 yards, while Philadelphia finished with 87 rushing yards.

Conclusion

The Chicago Bears vs Philadelphia Eagles Match Player Stats show that Chicago’s 24-15 victory was built on complete team execution rather than one dominant passing performance.

The Bears controlled the game through a powerful rushing attack led by Kyle Monangai and D’Andre Swift. Their combined production gave Chicago a major advantage in offensive balance and helped the team maintain control throughout the matchup.

Philadelphia received an outstanding performance from A.J. Brown and solid passing production from Jalen Hurts, but the Eagles could not overcome their struggles in the running game and the costly mistakes that affected their scoring opportunities.

Chicago’s 281 rushing yards, timely defensive plays, and 14 fourth-quarter points explain why the Bears left the game with the victory.

For readers studying match statistics, this game provides a clear example of how rushing efficiency, offensive balance, turnover management, and late-game execution can matter more than simply winning the passing-yard battle.