los angeles rams vs chicago bears match player stats
The los angeles rams vs chicago bears match player stats tell the story of an intense NFC Divisional Playoff game that delivered drama from the opening kickoff until overtime. Played on January 19, 2026, the Los Angeles Rams secured a hard fought 20 to 17 victory over the Chicago Bears after an extra period. While the final score was close, the statistics reveal how turnovers, red zone execution, rushing touchdowns, and defensive discipline ultimately shaped the outcome.
Playoff football is often decided by a handful of crucial moments rather than overwhelming dominance. This matchup perfectly reflected that reality. Chicago controlled several statistical categories, including total rushing yards and quarterback efficiency in some areas, yet Los Angeles capitalized on scoring opportunities when they mattered most. Individual performances from Kyren Williams, Matthew Stafford, Caleb Williams, Cobie Durant, and Harrison Mevis each influenced the final result in different ways.
This detailed breakdown examines every major aspect of the contest, including passing production, rushing efficiency, receiving leaders, defensive impact, special teams contributions, overtime performance, and the numbers that defined one of the most competitive postseason games of the season.
Los Angeles Rams vs Chicago Bears Match Player Stats
The NFC Divisional Playoff meeting featured two teams that enjoyed successful regular seasons. The Rams entered the game with a 12 and 5 record, while the Bears finished 11 and 6. Both teams had balanced offenses and defenses throughout the season, making this playoff showdown one of the most anticipated games of the weekend.
The contest remained close throughout all four quarters before extending into overtime. Neither side established complete control, forcing every drive to carry enormous importance.
Match Overview
| Category | Los Angeles Rams | Chicago Bears |
| Final Score | 20 | 17 |
| Result | Win | Loss |
| Venue Status | Away | Home |
| Regular Season Record | 12 and 5 | 11 and 6 |
| Quarter 1 | 7 | 0 |
| Quarter 2 | 3 | 10 |
| Quarter 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Quarter 4 | 7 | 7 |
| Overtime | 3 | 0 |
The score progression demonstrates just how competitive the matchup remained. The Rams established an early advantage before the Bears responded in the second quarter. Neither offense found much rhythm during the third quarter, while both teams scored again in the fourth to force overtime. A successful Rams field goal eventually settled the contest.
Quarter by Quarter Analysis
First Quarter
Los Angeles immediately gained momentum by scoring the game’s opening touchdown. Starting quickly allowed the Rams to dictate the early tempo while forcing Chicago to play from behind.
Defensively, the Rams prevented the Bears from putting points on the board during the opening quarter. Their ability to pressure key situations and limit explosive plays established confidence for the remainder of the game.
Score after First Quarter
- Rams 7
- Bears 0
Second Quarter
Chicago answered with one of its strongest stretches of the afternoon. The Bears scored ten unanswered points while slowing the Rams offense for much of the quarter.
Although Matthew Stafford continued moving the football through the air, the Rams managed only a field goal during this period. At halftime, Chicago had erased the early deficit and carried momentum into the locker room.
Halftime Score
- Rams 10
- Bears 10
The even halftime score reflected how evenly matched both teams were despite using different offensive approaches.
Third Quarter
The third quarter became a defensive battle.
Neither offense managed to score despite several promising drives. Defensive coordinators made effective halftime adjustments, resulting in tighter coverage, stronger run defense, and fewer explosive plays.
This scoreless quarter significantly increased the pressure entering the final fifteen minutes.
Fourth Quarter
Both offenses finally broke through again.
The Rams reached the end zone behind another productive rushing drive, while Chicago answered with a touchdown of its own to level the game once more.
Neither defense surrendered a game winning drive before regulation expired, leading to overtime.
End of Regulation
- Rams 17
- Bears 17
Overtime
Playoff overtime demands flawless execution.
The Rams remained composed, controlling field position before Harrison Mevis converted the decisive field goal.
Chicago failed to answer, ending an outstanding playoff contest with a three point defeat.
Final Score
- Los Angeles Rams 20
- Chicago Bears 17
Passing Performance Breakdown
Quarterback play often defines postseason success, and this game provided two very different statistical profiles.
Matthew Stafford Performance
Matthew Stafford completed 20 of his 42 pass attempts for 258 passing yards.
His statistical line included
- 20 completions
- 42 attempts
- 258 passing yards
- 6.1 yards per attempt
- 0 touchdowns
- 0 interceptions
- Four sacks for 29 lost yards
- Quarterback Rating of 67.4
- QBR of 31.5
At first glance, Stafford’s numbers appear modest by playoff standards. He did not throw a touchdown pass and spent much of the afternoon under pressure. However, one statistic stands above the rest.
Zero interceptions.
Protecting the football became one of the defining reasons Los Angeles advanced. Stafford consistently chose safe decisions over risky throws, allowing the running game and defense to influence the outcome.
His willingness to avoid costly mistakes proved more valuable than posting impressive passing totals.
Caleb Williams Performance
Caleb Williams finished with nearly identical passing yardage but experienced a far different afternoon.
His final statistics included
- 23 completions
- 42 attempts
- 257 passing yards
- Two touchdown passes
- Three interceptions
- 6.1 yards per attempt
- No sacks
- Quarterback Rating of 59.3
- QBR of 70.4
On paper, Williams produced more touchdowns while avoiding sacks entirely.
However, the three interceptions dramatically changed the game.
Each turnover shifted momentum toward Los Angeles and erased valuable scoring opportunities. While Williams displayed confidence and mobility throughout the contest, playoff football rarely forgives multiple giveaways against experienced opponents.
Comparing Both Quarterbacks
Although both quarterbacks finished with almost identical passing yardage, their performances highlight an important playoff lesson.
Matthew Stafford focused on ball security.
Caleb Williams generated more touchdowns but also committed three costly turnovers.
This contrast illustrates why statistics should always be evaluated within the broader context of game situations rather than isolated numbers.
Rushing Leaders
The ground game became one of the biggest differences in the contest.
Los Angeles relied heavily on Kyren Williams near the goal line, while Chicago generated more rushing yardage without converting those drives into rushing touchdowns.
Kyren Williams Delivers in Critical Moments
Kyren Williams carried the football 21 times for 87 yards.
His performance included
- 21 rushing attempts
- 87 rushing yards
- 4.1 yards per carry
- Two rushing touchdowns
- Longest run of 10 yards
Although he never produced an explosive run, his consistency allowed the Rams to sustain drives and finish possessions inside the red zone.
Scoring both rushing touchdowns made him arguably the most valuable offensive player of the afternoon.
D’Andre Swift Keeps Chicago Competitive
D’Andre Swift recorded
- 19 carries
- 76 rushing yards
- 4.0 yards per carry
- No touchdowns
- Longest run of 13 yards
Swift consistently gained positive yardage and helped Chicago maintain offensive balance.
Despite his efficiency, the Bears were unable to convert their rushing production into touchdowns, highlighting the importance of finishing drives rather than simply accumulating yards.
Team Rushing Comparison
Looking beyond the individual rushing leaders provides a better understanding of how both offenses approached the game.
Los Angeles Rams Team Rushing
The Rams finished with:
- 31 rushing attempts
- 111 rushing yards
- 3.6 yards per carry
- 2 rushing touchdowns
Although the average per carry was not exceptional, Los Angeles consistently trusted its running game in key situations. Rather than chasing explosive gains, the offense focused on staying ahead of the chains and controlling possession inside scoring territory.
The biggest advantage came near the goal line. Every rushing touchdown increased pressure on Chicago to answer through the passing game.
Chicago Bears Team Rushing
Chicago produced stronger overall rushing numbers:
- 39 rushing attempts
- 160 rushing yards
- 4.1 yards per carry
- 0 rushing touchdowns
From a statistical perspective, the Bears won the battle on the ground. Their offensive line created running lanes throughout the afternoon, allowing D’Andre Swift and the rushing attack to steadily move the football.
However, playoff football rewards points rather than yardage.
Despite gaining 49 more rushing yards than the Rams, Chicago failed to score a rushing touchdown. That inability to finish drives ultimately proved costly.
Receiving Leaders
Neither offense featured a dominant receiving performance. Instead, both quarterbacks spread the football among multiple targets.
This balanced approach limited huge individual numbers but reflected the defensive quality on both sides.
Colby Parkinson Leads the Rams
Colby Parkinson finished as Los Angeles’ leading receiver with:
- 3 receptions
- 56 receiving yards
- 18.7 yards per catch
- 0 touchdowns
Although he caught only three passes, each reception generated meaningful yardage. His ability to stretch the field helped create space underneath for other receivers and supported several important offensive drives.
His average of 18.7 yards per reception was one of the most efficient receiving marks in the game.
Colston Loveland Leads Chicago
Chicago’s leading receiver was Colston Loveland, who recorded:
- 4 receptions
- 56 receiving yards
- 14.0 yards per reception
- 0 touchdowns
Loveland consistently moved the chains and provided Caleb Williams with a reliable target during important passing situations.
While he did not reach the end zone, his steady production contributed to several scoring drives.
Team Receiving Statistics
A comparison of the overall passing production shows how evenly matched the offenses were.
Rams
- 20 receptions
- 258 receiving yards
- 12.9 yards per reception
- 0 receiving touchdowns
Bears
- 23 receptions
- 257 receiving yards
- 11.2 yards per reception
- 2 receiving touchdowns
The total receiving yards differed by only one yard.
Chicago produced more receptions and both passing touchdowns, but Los Angeles generated a higher average gain per catch.
Once again, efficiency in critical situations outweighed raw statistical totals.
Defensive Performance
Championship teams often separate themselves through defense, and this matchup offered several examples.
The Rams defense repeatedly responded whenever momentum began shifting toward Chicago.
Rather than relying on constant pressure, Los Angeles focused on creating turnovers and limiting explosive mistakes.
That strategy paid off throughout regulation and overtime.
Rams Secondary Changes the Game
The defining defensive statistic belonged to the Rams.
Los Angeles intercepted Caleb Williams three times.
Those takeaways prevented promising Chicago drives from becoming points and repeatedly handed favorable field position back to the offense.
In playoff football, winning the turnover battle frequently determines the winner.
The Rams finished with a decisive advantage in that category.
Cobie Durant’s Outstanding Performance
Cobie Durant delivered one of the best defensive performances of the postseason.
His statistics included:
- 2 interceptions
Each interception came during critical moments, immediately changing field position and momentum.
Instead of allowing Chicago to build confidence, Durant consistently forced the Bears to start over.
Few defensive players had a greater influence on the final result.
Kam Curl Adds Another Takeaway
Kam Curl contributed the Rams’ third interception.
While it counts as only one statistic, the timing of turnovers often matters more than the total number.
Curl’s interception helped maintain defensive control and prevented another potential scoring opportunity for Chicago.
Bears Defensive Effort
Although Chicago did not record an interception, its defense still performed well for much of the contest.
Several aspects stood out.
Strong Run Defense Early
The Bears slowed the Rams rushing attack for extended stretches.
Los Angeles averaged only 3.6 yards per carry, showing Chicago consistently won first contact near the line of scrimmage.
Effective Pass Rush
Matthew Stafford was sacked four times.
Generating pressure without relying heavily on blitzes disrupted the Rams passing rhythm and forced several quick decisions.
Had Chicago paired that pass rush with one or two takeaways, the outcome may have been different.
Turnover Analysis
Turnovers represented the clearest statistical difference between both teams.
Rams
- 2 fumbles
- 0 fumbles lost
- 2 recovered
- 0 interceptions thrown
Despite putting the ball on the ground twice, Los Angeles recovered both fumbles.
Protecting possession allowed the Rams to avoid giving Chicago any short field opportunities.
Bears
- 1 fumble
- 0 fumbles lost
- 3 interceptions thrown
Although the Bears also recovered their only fumble, the three interceptions overshadowed every other offensive statistic.
Those turnovers became the biggest reason Chicago could not capitalize on its otherwise productive offensive performance.
Why Turnovers Mattered More Than Yardage
Many fans naturally focus on passing yards or total offense when evaluating a game.
This matchup demonstrated why that approach can be misleading.
Chicago matched Los Angeles in passing production.
Chicago rushed for more yards.
Chicago threw more touchdown passes.
Yet Los Angeles won.
The explanation lies in ball security.
Every possession has value during the playoffs. Giving away three possessions through interceptions places enormous pressure on both the offense and defense.
The Rams never placed themselves in that position.
Their disciplined decision making ultimately outweighed Chicago’s statistical advantages.
Special Teams Performance
Special teams quietly played a major role throughout the contest.
Every kick, punt, and field position battle became increasingly important as the game remained tied deep into the fourth quarter.
Harrison Mevis Delivers Under Pressure
The Rams kicker finished with an outstanding performance.
His statistics included:
- 2 field goals on 2 attempts
- Longest field goal of 42 yards
- 2 successful extra points
- 8 total points
Most importantly, Mevis converted the overtime game winner.
Playoff kickers often face enormous pressure, and Mevis responded with a flawless afternoon.
Cairo Santos Remains Reliable
Chicago’s veteran kicker also performed well.
His final numbers included:
- 1 field goal on 1 attempt
- Longest field goal of 48 yards
- 2 successful extra points
- 5 total points
Santos converted every opportunity presented to him, leaving little room for criticism regarding Chicago’s kicking game.
Punting Battle
Field position frequently influences playoff outcomes, making punting statistics more valuable than many fans realize.
Ethan Evans
The Rams punter recorded:
- 8 punts
- 380 total punting yards
- 47.5 yard average
- Longest punt of 61 yards
His ability to consistently flip field position reduced pressure on the Rams defense.
Tory Taylor
Chicago’s punter finished with:
- 3 punts
- 141 total yards
- 47.0 yard average
- Longest punt of 51 yards
Although Taylor punted fewer times, his average remained nearly identical to Evans.
Both specialists delivered strong performances throughout the game.
Advanced Statistical Insights
A quick glance at the box score suggests that both teams were evenly matched. However, a deeper examination shows why the Rams advanced despite not leading every major statistical category.
The Bears generated more rushing yards and threw two touchdown passes. The Rams, on the other hand, relied on disciplined football, timely defensive plays, and efficient scoring inside the red zone.
This game serves as a reminder that playoff success is rarely determined by one impressive statistic. Instead, it comes from executing consistently during high pressure moments.
Comparing the Offensive Production
Passing
Both quarterbacks finished with almost identical passing yardage.
- Matthew Stafford: 258 yards
- Caleb Williams: 257 yards
The one yard difference highlights how evenly balanced the passing attacks were throughout the afternoon.
The biggest distinction came in decision making.
Stafford completed the game without throwing an interception, while Caleb Williams threw three. Those turnovers erased several promising drives and gave the Rams additional opportunities to control the game.
Rushing
Chicago finished with the stronger rushing totals.
- Rams: 111 rushing yards
- Bears: 160 rushing yards
Despite producing nearly 50 more rushing yards, Chicago never reached the end zone on the ground.
Los Angeles gained fewer yards but converted two rushing touchdowns through Kyren Williams.
This illustrates an important football principle.
Finishing drives matters more than accumulating yardage between the twenties.
Receiving
The receiving numbers were nearly identical.
- Rams: 258 receiving yards
- Bears: 257 receiving yards
Neither offense relied on one dominant receiver.
Instead, both quarterbacks distributed the football among multiple targets, forcing defenses to defend the entire field.
That balanced approach prevented any single player from recording huge individual statistics.
Biggest Game Changing Moments
Several plays completely changed the direction of the contest.
Rams Score First
Opening the game with a touchdown allowed Los Angeles to play with confidence and avoid chasing the scoreboard early.
An early lead also forced Chicago to become more aggressive as the game progressed.
Chicago Responds Before Halftime
The Bears answered with ten second quarter points, erasing the early deficit and proving they could compete with one of the league’s most experienced playoff teams.
The momentum shift created an evenly balanced contest entering halftime.
Defensive Stand During the Third Quarter
Neither offense scored in the third quarter.
While some viewers may describe that period as uneventful, it actually reflected excellent defensive adjustments from both coaching staffs.
Every stop increased the importance of the fourth quarter.
Three Interceptions
The Rams secondary delivered the biggest defensive plays of the afternoon.
Cobie Durant intercepted two passes, while Kam Curl added another.
Those takeaways consistently disrupted Chicago’s rhythm and prevented the Bears from taking control of the game.
Overtime Execution
When regulation ended at 17 to 17, both teams understood that one mistake could end their season.
The Rams remained composed, moved into scoring position, and Harrison Mevis converted the winning field goal.
That final drive rewarded the team’s patience and disciplined decision making.
Players Who Had the Greatest Impact
Several players made contributions that extended beyond their individual statistics.
Kyren Williams
Kyren Williams may not have produced the highest rushing total of the game, but his two touchdowns represented the difference on the scoreboard.
His consistent running style also helped Los Angeles control the pace during critical possessions.
Matthew Stafford
Stafford demonstrated why experienced quarterbacks remain valuable in postseason football.
Although he did not throw a touchdown pass, he protected possession, avoided risky throws, and allowed the rest of the team to capitalize on scoring opportunities.
Caleb Williams
The Bears quarterback displayed confidence throughout the game.
Throwing for 257 yards and two touchdowns against a playoff defense is an encouraging performance.
However, the three interceptions overshadowed much of his positive work.
Reducing turnovers in future postseason appearances could significantly improve Chicago’s chances in similar contests.
Cobie Durant
Few defenders influenced the outcome more than Cobie Durant.
His two interceptions shifted momentum multiple times and limited Chicago’s ability to build sustained offensive success.
Playoff games are often remembered for defensive heroes, and Durant certainly earned recognition for his performance.
Harrison Mevis
Pressure creates unforgettable moments for kickers.
Mevis converted every kick and delivered the game winning field goal in overtime.
Without his accuracy, the Rams would not have advanced.
What the Statistics Reveal
The numbers from this playoff matchup reveal several important lessons.
First, protecting the football remains one of the strongest indicators of postseason success.
Second, red zone efficiency outweighs total offensive yardage.
Third, defensive takeaways can completely change momentum, even when both offenses produce similar yardage.
Finally, special teams continue to play a decisive role in close playoff games.
The Rams excelled in each of these areas, explaining why they emerged with a 20 to 17 overtime victory.
Key Takeaways
- Los Angeles defeated Chicago 20 to 17 in overtime.
- Both quarterbacks finished with nearly identical passing yardage.
- Kyren Williams scored both Rams touchdowns.
- Caleb Williams threw two touchdown passes but also three interceptions.
- Cobie Durant recorded two interceptions.
- Kam Curl added another interception.
- Harrison Mevis remained perfect on every kick and converted the overtime game winner.
- Chicago rushed for more yards but failed to score on the ground.
- Ball security proved to be the biggest difference between the two teams.
FAQs
What are the most important los angeles rams vs chicago bears match player stats?
The most significant statistics include Kyren Williams rushing for 87 yards and two touchdowns, Matthew Stafford passing for 258 yards without an interception, Caleb Williams throwing for 257 yards with two touchdowns and three interceptions, and Cobie Durant recording two interceptions.
Who was the leading passer in the game?
Matthew Stafford led the Rams with 258 passing yards, while Caleb Williams threw for 257 passing yards for the Bears.
Which player scored the Rams touchdowns?
Kyren Williams scored both rushing touchdowns for Los Angeles, making him the team’s only touchdown scorer during the game.
Why did the Rams win despite fewer rushing yards?
The Rams protected the football, forced three interceptions, converted rushing opportunities into touchdowns, and executed successfully in overtime.
Who led both teams in receiving yards?
Colby Parkinson led the Rams with 56 receiving yards, while Colston Loveland also finished with 56 receiving yards for the Bears.
How important were turnovers in this playoff game?
Turnovers were arguably the deciding factor. Los Angeles committed no interceptions, while Chicago threw three, giving the Rams valuable extra possessions and shifting momentum throughout the game.
Conclusion
The los angeles rams vs chicago bears match player stats highlight a playoff game where discipline, execution, and timely defensive plays mattered more than raw offensive production. Although Chicago matched Los Angeles in passing yards and surpassed them in rushing yards, the Rams consistently made the most of their scoring opportunities while protecting possession.
Kyren Williams provided the offensive finishing touch with two rushing touchdowns, Matthew Stafford managed the game without costly mistakes, Cobie Durant delivered two momentum changing interceptions, and Harrison Mevis sealed the victory with a composed overtime field goal. Together, those performances explain how Los Angeles earned a hard fought 20 to 17 victory and advanced in the NFC playoffs.
