Toronto Raptors vs 76ers Match Player Stats
The toronto raptors vs 76ers match player stats tell a much deeper story than the final 130-120 score suggests. Philadelphia defeated Toronto at Xfinity Mobile Arena in a game that swung dramatically after the Raptors opened with a 43-point first quarter. Tyrese Maxey led all scorers with 31 points, Joel Embiid added 29, and Trendon Watford produced a remarkable triple-double with 20 points, 17 rebounds, and 10 assists. For Toronto, RJ Barrett and Immanuel Quickley each scored 22 points, while Brandon Ingram added 21.
The result was especially notable because Toronto entered the game having won four straight games against Philadelphia during the previous season. The Raptors also started this matchup brilliantly, scoring 43 points in the opening period. Philadelphia, however, answered with a 35-point second quarter and gradually took control.
This article breaks down the complete toronto raptors vs 76ers match player stats, including individual scoring, shooting efficiency, rebounding, playmaking, defense, plus-minus, team statistics, quarter-by-quarter momentum, and the tactical reasons Philadelphia eventually won.
Toronto Raptors vs 76ers Match Player Stats
The first thing to understand about this game is that the box score contains several competing stories.
Toronto scored 120 points, shot 45.6% from the field, made 16 three-pointers, and committed only 10 turnovers. Those are generally strong offensive numbers. Yet Philadelphia still won by 10 points.
The biggest reason was Philadelphia’s control of the glass and its efficiency inside the three-point line.
The 76ers shot 51.0% overall compared with Toronto’s 45.6%. They also collected 54 rebounds against Toronto’s 38. That 16-rebound advantage gave Philadelphia additional possessions and helped compensate for its relatively modest 28.6% three-point shooting.
The official NBA box score confirms the team totals and individual performances from the game.
Game summary
| Category | Toronto Raptors | Philadelphia 76ers |
| Final score | 120 | 130 |
| Field goals | 41-90 | 49-96 |
| Field goal percentage | 45.6% | 51.0% |
| Three-pointers | 16-38 | 10-35 |
| Three-point percentage | 42.1% | 28.6% |
| Free throws | 22-28 | 22-28 |
| Free throw percentage | 78.6% | 78.6% |
| Rebounds | 38 | 54 |
| Assists | 29 | 31 |
| Turnovers | 10 | 13 |
| Steals | 7 | 4 |
| Blocks | 5 | 9 |
| Offensive rebounds | 10 | 15 |
| Defensive rebounds | 28 | 39 |
| Personal fouls | 25 | 22 |
Philadelphia did not win because it was dramatically better from three-point range. Toronto actually had a major advantage there.
Instead, the 76ers won through a combination of interior efficiency, rebounding, rim protection, and high-level individual shot creation.
How the Game Changed Quarter by Quarter
The quarter scores explain the game better than the final score alone.
Toronto started with an extraordinary 43-point first quarter. Philadelphia scored 33, meaning the Raptors built a 10-point advantage almost immediately.
Then everything changed.
First quarter: Toronto 43, Philadelphia 33
Toronto’s opening period was its best offensive stretch of the game.
The Raptors shot confidently and created enough offensive rhythm to reach 43 points. Their 16 three-pointers for the full game also demonstrate that the early offense was not simply dependent on attacking the basket.
Scottie Barnes, Immanuel Quickley, RJ Barrett, and Brandon Ingram provided multiple scoring options.
Philadelphia still managed to score 33 points, so the game was never completely under control for Toronto. The 76ers remained close enough to make a second-quarter response meaningful.
Second quarter: Philadelphia 35, Toronto 20
This was the turning point.
Philadelphia outscored Toronto 35-20, converting Toronto’s 10-point first-quarter lead into a five-point halftime deficit.
That 15-point swing was enormous.
The Raptors’ offense cooled sharply, while Philadelphia began exploiting its physical advantage. The 76ers’ eventual 54-38 rebounding edge started to become increasingly important.
Toronto could make three-pointers, but Philadelphia was generating more reliable offense around the paint.
Third quarter: Philadelphia 33, Toronto 34
Toronto responded.
The Raptors actually won the third quarter 34-33, showing that the game was not a one-sided Philadelphia performance.
However, the damage from the second quarter remained.
Philadelphia entered the final period with a four-point advantage and had already established control of the rebounding battle.
Fourth quarter: Philadelphia 29, Toronto 23
The final period was about execution.
Toronto continued to fight and eventually moved within 119-116 after an RJ Barrett three-pointer with 3:25 remaining. According to the game recap, Philadelphia then scored the next six points to create enough separation to close the game.
That sequence illustrates why raw scoring totals can be misleading.
Toronto had enough offensive talent to stay close, but Philadelphia made the decisive plays when the margin became small.
Toronto Raptors Player Performance Breakdown
Toronto had four players score at least 21 points, which makes the 10-point defeat particularly interesting.
The Raptors did not lose because they lacked scoring options. They lost because Philadelphia’s overall statistical profile was stronger.
RJ Barrett
22 points, 3 rebounds, 6 assists, 7-12 FG, 2-4 3PT, 6-7 FT, -14
Barrett was one of Toronto’s most efficient scorers.
He made seven of his 12 field-goal attempts, converted two of four three-point attempts, and went six for seven at the free-throw line.
His six assists were also important because they show that his contribution was not limited to scoring.
The biggest issue was his minus-14 rating.
Plus-minus should not be interpreted as an individual defensive grade or as proof that one player caused a team’s problems. It represents the team’s point differential while that player is on the court. The NBA’s official statistics glossary defines it in those terms.
Barrett’s offensive performance was therefore much better than his plus-minus might suggest.
Immanuel Quickley
22 points, 6 rebounds, 6 assists, 8-16 FG, 5-9 3PT, 1-2 FT, -8
Quickley was arguably Toronto’s most important perimeter scorer.
His five made three-pointers came on nine attempts, giving him a 55.6% conversion rate from long range. He also added six rebounds and six assists.
That combination is valuable because it means Quickley was contributing in three different areas.
His 8-for-16 shooting produced a 50% field-goal percentage, while his nine three-point attempts represented a major part of Toronto’s offensive spacing.
If Toronto wanted to win this matchup, Quickley’s perimeter production was exactly the type of performance it needed.
Brandon Ingram
21 points, 8 rebounds, 5 assists, 7-17 FG, 0-3 3PT, 7-7 FT, -11
Ingram filled the box score efficiently in several categories.
His eight rebounds were second among Toronto’s primary scorers, and his five assists helped maintain ball movement.
The weakness was his three-point shooting. Ingram went 0-for-3 from beyond the arc.
He was perfect at the free-throw line, however, going seven for seven.
His 21 points on 17 shots indicate a useful offensive contribution, but Philadelphia’s defensive pressure and superior interior size prevented Toronto’s primary creators from consistently controlling the game.
Scottie Barnes
18 points, 5 rebounds, 4 assists, 7-14 FG, 2-5 3PT, 2-3 FT, 2 steals, 2 blocks, +4
Barnes produced one of the most complete performances for Toronto.
He scored 18 points while shooting 50% from the field. More importantly, he added two steals and two blocks.
His +4 was also the best plus-minus among Toronto’s major contributors.
That combination matters.
Barnes was not Toronto’s highest scorer, but his all-around influence was obvious. He helped defend the perimeter, protect the basket, create offense, and contribute on the glass.
His performance demonstrates why player evaluation should not rely solely on points.
Collin Murray-Boyles
12 points, 7 rebounds, 1 assist, 4-6 FG, 1-1 3PT, 3-6 FT, 1 steal, 2 blocks, +2
Murray-Boyles was highly efficient from the field.
He made four of six shots and added seven rebounds and two blocks.
His +2 was another indication that Toronto’s bench and secondary contributors could have positive stretches even though the team lost.
His seven rebounds were particularly valuable given Toronto’s overall disadvantage on the glass.
Sandro Mamukelashvili
10 points, 3 rebounds, 2 assists, 3-5 FG, 1-3 3PT, 3-3 FT, 2 steals, 1 block, -3
Mamukelashvili provided efficient scoring and defensive activity.
He shot 60% from the field, made one three-pointer, and converted all three free throws.
His two steals and one block also show that his impact went beyond shooting.
Jamal Shead
9 points, 3 rebounds, 5 assists, 3-7 FG, 3-5 3PT, 1 steal, -9
Shead supplied five assists and three made three-pointers.
His 60% three-point shooting was one of Toronto’s better perimeter performances.
However, the Raptors needed more consistent production from their entire rotation because Philadelphia was generating points from multiple positions.
Ja’Kobe Walter and Gradey Dick
Walter scored three points on 1-of-6 shooting and finished at -16.
Dick also scored three points on 1-of-6 shooting, although he finished at +5.
These performances highlight an important point about plus-minus.
Two players can produce similar scoring numbers while having completely different on-court results because of lineup combinations, defensive possessions, rebounding, and opponent scoring during their minutes.
Philadelphia 76ers Player Performance Breakdown
Philadelphia’s individual statistics were led by Tyrese Maxey and Joel Embiid, but the most unusual performance came from Trendon Watford.
Together, the three created a balanced offensive structure that Toronto struggled to contain.
Tyrese Maxey
31 points, 4 rebounds, 7 assists, 12-24 FG, 3-10 3PT, 4-5 FT, 1 steal, 2 blocks, +21
Maxey was the game’s leading scorer.
His 31 points came on 24 field-goal attempts, and he added seven assists. He also contributed one steal and two blocks.
The +21 rating was the strongest among all players in the game.
His three-point shooting was not spectacular at 3-of-10, but Philadelphia did not need him to rely exclusively on outside shooting.
Maxey’s ability to create shots from different areas of the floor was more important.
He was able to attack, finish, distribute, and force Toronto’s defense to react.
Joel Embiid
29 points, 6 rebounds, 4 assists, 10-16 FG, 1-4 3PT, 8-9 FT, 1 block, +15
Embiid was extremely efficient.
He made 10 of 16 field-goal attempts, good for 62.5%.
He also went eight for nine at the free-throw line.
His 29 points came without needing excessive shooting volume.
That efficiency was a major contrast to the Raptors’ struggle to consistently generate high-quality scoring opportunities once the game moved beyond the first quarter.
Embiid’s six rebounds and one block added further value.
Trendon Watford
20 points, 17 rebounds, 10 assists, 8-10 FG, 1-2 3PT, 3-5 FT, 1 block, +12
Watford produced the most unusual statistical performance of the night.
He recorded a triple-double with 20 points, 17 rebounds, and 10 assists.
The efficiency is equally impressive.
He made eight of 10 field-goal attempts, meaning he scored 20 points on only 10 shots.
The 17 rebounds were particularly important because Toronto finished with only 38 total rebounds as a team.
Watford alone collected nearly half as many rebounds as the entire Raptors squad.
His 10 assists also demonstrate that Philadelphia’s offense was not simply a two-man operation centered on Maxey and Embiid.
The official NBA game materials specifically highlighted Watford’s first career triple-double.
Kelly Oubre Jr.
19 points, 4 rebounds, 1 assist, 8-15 FG, 1-6 3PT, 2-3 FT, 2 blocks, +5
Oubre provided 19 points on 15 shots.
His three-point shooting was less efficient at 1-for-6, but he compensated by attacking closer to the basket.
His two blocks were also valuable in a game where Philadelphia finished with nine blocks.
VJ Edgecombe
11 points, 7 rebounds, 4 assists, 5-15 FG, 0-4 3PT, 1-2 FT, 3 steals, +7
Edgecombe’s scoring efficiency was modest, but his defensive contribution stood out.
Three steals helped Philadelphia generate extra possessions, while seven rebounds and four assists expanded his overall impact.
This is another example of why a player should not be judged entirely by scoring.
Quentin Grimes
13 points, 2 rebounds, 2 assists, 4-8 FG, 3-6 3PT, 2-2 FT, +2
Grimes gave Philadelphia efficient perimeter scoring.
He made three of six three-point attempts and converted both free throws.
His 50% overall field-goal percentage made him one of Philadelphia’s more efficient shooting contributors.
Andre Drummond
4 points, 8 rebounds, 1 assist, 1-5 FG, 2-2 FT, 1 block, +8
Drummond did not need a large scoring role.
His eight rebounds and one block helped Philadelphia maintain its physical advantage.
His +8 also reflects the positive team impact during his minutes.
Why Philadelphia Won Despite Shooting Only 29% From Three
One of the most interesting aspects of the game is the three-point comparison.
Toronto made 16 of 38 attempts, which is 42.1%.
Philadelphia made only 10 of 35, or 28.6%.
If the game were decided purely by three-point shooting, Toronto would have had a major advantage.
Instead, Philadelphia won by 10 points.
The explanation is that three-point percentage was only one component of the game.
Philadelphia shot 51.0% overall compared with Toronto’s 45.6%.
The 76ers also held a 54-38 rebounding advantage.
That created a major possession advantage.
Philadelphia also blocked nine shots compared with Toronto’s five.
In addition, the 76ers scored 64 points in the paint, while Toronto scored 38.
That 26-point advantage in paint scoring is one of the clearest explanations for the final result.
Toronto’s three-point shooting was excellent, but Philadelphia’s interior offense was more consistent.
The Rebounding Battle Decided the Statistical Profile
The 54-38 rebounding difference deserves special attention.
Philadelphia collected 15 offensive rebounds compared with Toronto’s 10.
The 76ers also secured 39 defensive rebounds compared with Toronto’s 28.
That means Philadelphia controlled both ends of the rebounding battle.
Offensive rebounds are especially important because they can create additional scoring opportunities after an initial miss.
A team can shoot a lower percentage and still produce a strong offensive result if it generates enough additional possessions.
Philadelphia’s 15 offensive rebounds helped it maintain pressure even when its three-point shooting was poor.
Toronto’s 16 Three-Pointers Were Not Enough
Toronto’s 16 made threes were one of the strongest statistical aspects of its performance.
The Raptors shot 16-for-38 from beyond the arc.
That works out to 42.1%.
Quickley was 5-for-9.
Barnes was 2-for-5.
Barrett was 2-for-4.
Shead was 3-for-5.
Those numbers show that Toronto had multiple perimeter threats.
The problem was that the Raptors could not consistently combine that perimeter production with interior scoring.
Philadelphia’s nine blocks and 64 points in the paint show how strongly the 76ers influenced the interior game.
This created an unusual statistical contrast.
Toronto had the better three-point night, while Philadelphia had the better overall shooting night.
Turnovers Were Not the Main Problem for Toronto
Toronto committed only 10 turnovers.
Philadelphia committed 13.
So the Raptors actually had a three-turnover advantage.
That is another reason the final score cannot be explained by a simple offensive mistake narrative.
Toronto generally protected the ball well.
The more significant problem was what happened after Philadelphia gained possession and attacked the basket.
The 76ers converted their opportunities efficiently and repeatedly benefited from their rebounding advantage.
The Final Three Minutes
The final stretch provides perhaps the clearest picture of the game’s competitive nature.
Toronto was not blown out.
The Raptors cut Philadelphia’s lead to three points at 119-116 with 3:25 remaining after Barrett hit a three-pointer.
At that point, the game was still available.
Philadelphia responded immediately.
Edgecombe scored on a layup, Oubre finished a dunk, and Embiid followed his own miss to extend the lead. The six-point run gave Philadelphia enough breathing room to finish the game.
That sequence is important because it demonstrates the value of late-game shot quality.
When the score tightened, Philadelphia found reliable interior opportunities.
Toronto had already demonstrated that it could hit three-pointers, but Philadelphia’s late response came through higher-percentage plays.
What the Plus-Minus Numbers Actually Tell Us
Plus-minus can be useful, but it should be interpreted carefully.
For example, Maxey finished at +21.
Embiid finished at +15.
Watford finished at +12.
All three were strongly positive.
On Toronto’s side, Barnes finished at +4 and Murray-Boyles finished at +2.
Meanwhile, Walter finished at -16 and Barrett at -14.
These numbers indicate how the teams performed during specific players’ minutes, but they do not isolate individual performance.
A player’s plus-minus can be affected by teammates, opponent lineups, substitutions, shooting variance, and the specific portions of the game in which the player was on the floor.
That is why plus-minus works best when combined with traditional box-score statistics.
The Biggest Statistical Mismatch: Paint Scoring
The most revealing team statistic was points in the paint.
Philadelphia scored 64.
Toronto scored 38.
That is a 26-point difference.
Philadelphia’s advantage in this area helps explain why its three-point shooting did not need to be excellent.
The 76ers could attack the interior, draw defensive attention, create second chances, and finish efficiently.
Toronto, by contrast, needed its outside shooting to remain highly effective.
Once the Raptors’ offense became less explosive after the first quarter, Philadelphia had a more dependable way to manufacture points.
What Toronto Did Well
Despite the loss, Toronto produced several positive indicators.
Strong perimeter shooting
The Raptors made 16 three-pointers at a 42.1% rate.
That is a significant offensive strength.
Ball security
Toronto committed only 10 turnovers.
That helped prevent Philadelphia from gaining easy transition opportunities.
Balanced scoring
Four Raptors reached at least 21 points:
- RJ Barrett: 22
- Immanuel Quickley: 22
- Brandon Ingram: 21
- Scottie Barnes: 18
Technically, Barnes finished at 18, so Toronto had three players at 21 or more and a fourth at 18.
That is still a healthy distribution.
Barnes’ all-around contribution
Barnes recorded two steals and two blocks while shooting 50% from the field.
His +4 was also the best among Toronto’s primary players.
What Toronto Needed to Improve
The main weaknesses were structural rather than purely individual.
Rebounding
Giving Philadelphia a 54-38 advantage on the glass was costly.
Interior defense
Allowing 64 points in the paint meant Philadelphia repeatedly found productive scoring areas.
Second-half consistency
Toronto’s 43-point opening quarter was outstanding, but the offense could not sustain that level.
Late-game execution
The Raptors came within three points late but could not stop Philadelphia’s closing run.
What Philadelphia Did Well
Philadelphia’s victory came from several complementary strengths.
Efficient two-point offense
The 76ers shot 51% overall.
Rebounding
The 54-38 advantage was substantial.
Rim protection
Philadelphia recorded nine blocks.
Multiple creators
Maxey, Embiid, and Watford combined for 80 points.
That trio also produced 21 assists.
Late-game composure
Philadelphia responded immediately after Toronto reduced the deficit to three points.
A Closer Look at the Team Shooting Numbers
The shooting comparison is worth putting into context.
Toronto:
- 41-of-90 from the field
- 16-of-38 from three
- 22-of-28 from the line
Philadelphia:
- 49-of-96 from the field
- 10-of-35 from three
- 22-of-28 from the line
The free-throw numbers were identical.
Toronto had the superior three-point percentage.
Philadelphia had the superior field-goal percentage.
The 76ers also attempted six more field goals.
When combined with the rebounding advantage, those extra attempts became important.
What the Game Says About Both Teams
The game revealed two different offensive identities.
Toronto showed that it could generate points through perimeter shooting and several individual creators.
Philadelphia demonstrated that it could win without relying on three-point accuracy.
That distinction matters over a long NBA season.
A team that can score in multiple ways has more options when one part of the offense becomes inefficient.
Philadelphia’s 64 points in the paint demonstrated exactly that type of flexibility.
Toronto’s 16 made threes demonstrated its own offensive ceiling, but the Raptors needed greater control of the interior game to turn that shooting into a victory.
Important Data Note About the Season Series
The core November game data supplied for this article matches the official NBA box score, including the 130-120 Philadelphia victory, the 16 Toronto three-pointers, the 54-38 rebounding margin, and the individual performances.
There is, however, a date-labeling issue in the supplied season-series information.
The official NBA record lists the first game as November 8, 2025, with the game information showing November 9 at 12:30 AM. The next Philadelphia-Toronto meeting was officially recorded on November 19, 2025, when Toronto won 121-112.
The later games in the supplied data are also shifted by one day. The official NBA record lists the overtime meeting as January 11, 2026, with Toronto winning 116-115, followed by Philadelphia’s 115-102 win on January 12, 2026.
For a published statistics article, using the official game dates is preferable because it prevents readers from confusing the individual match records.
What Readers Should Take From These Player Stats
The most useful way to read this game is not simply to identify the highest scorer.
Maxey led the game with 31 points, but Watford’s 20-point, 17-rebound, 10-assist triple-double was arguably the most unusual statistical contribution.
Embiid’s 29 points on 10-of-16 shooting showed how efficient Philadelphia could be inside.
For Toronto, Quickley and Barrett each scored 22, while Ingram added 21.
Barnes contributed 18 points along with two steals and two blocks.
The deeper lesson is that Philadelphia won through a combination of efficiency, rebounding, interior scoring, and late-game execution.
Toronto’s three-point shooting was excellent, but it could not compensate for the 16-rebound deficit and 26-point disadvantage in paint scoring.
FAQs
Who led the Raptors in scoring against the 76ers?
RJ Barrett and Immanuel Quickley led Toronto with 22 points each. Brandon Ingram added 21 points, while Scottie Barnes scored 18.
Who led the 76ers in scoring?
Tyrese Maxey led all players with 31 points. Joel Embiid scored 29 points, while Trendon Watford added 20.
Did Trendon Watford record a triple-double?
Yes. Watford finished with 20 points, 17 rebounds, and 10 assists. It was his first career triple-double according to the official NBA game materials.
Which team shot better from three-point range?
Toronto shot better from three. The Raptors made 16 of 38 attempts for 42.1%, while Philadelphia made 10 of 35 for 28.6%.
Why did Philadelphia win despite Toronto’s better three-point shooting?
Philadelphia dominated several other statistical areas. The 76ers shot 51.0% overall, outrebounded Toronto 54-38, scored 64 points in the paint compared with Toronto’s 38, and recorded nine blocks.
What was the final score?
Philadelphia defeated Toronto 130-120. The official NBA record lists the game in the November 8, 2025 schedule, with the game information showing November 9 at 12:30 AM in Philadelphia.
Conclusion
The toronto raptors vs 76ers match player stats reveal a game in which Toronto’s offense was strong enough to win on another night, but Philadelphia had the more complete statistical profile.
Toronto’s 16 three-pointers and 45.6% overall shooting kept the Raptors competitive. Barrett and Quickley each scored 22, Ingram added 21, and Barnes delivered an all-around performance with 18 points, two steals, and two blocks.
Philadelphia ultimately had more reliable sources of offense.
Maxey scored 31, Embiid produced 29 points on highly efficient shooting, and Watford delivered a rare 20-point, 17-rebound, 10-assist triple-double. The 76ers also dominated the glass 54-38, scored 64 points in the paint, and blocked nine shots.
The most important lesson from the toronto raptors vs 76ers match player stats is that shooting from three was only one part of the contest. Toronto won the perimeter shooting battle, but Philadelphia won the possession and interior battles that mattered just as much.
For readers analyzing NBA box scores, the clearest takeaway is to look beyond points. Rebounds, shot efficiency, assists, turnovers, paint scoring, offensive rebounds, defensive activity, and plus-minus together provide a much more complete picture of why a game was won or lost.
The official NBA statistical glossary is useful when interpreting less familiar statistics such as plus-minus and other advanced box-score measures.
