76ers vs Charlotte Hornets Match Player Stats
The 76ers vs charlotte hornets match player stats tell the story of a one-sided NBA matchup in which the Charlotte Hornets overwhelmed the Philadelphia 76ers 130-93 at Spectrum Center. Charlotte turned a six-point first-quarter lead into a 25-point halftime advantage before producing a huge 40-point third quarter. Brandon Miller led all scorers with 30 points, while Kelly Oubre Jr. paced Philadelphia with 17.
The game was much more than a simple scoring contest. Charlotte dominated several important statistical categories, including field-goal percentage, three-point shooting, rebounding and assists. The Hornets shot 57% from the field and 41% from three, while Philadelphia shot 39% overall and 30% from beyond the arc.
The rebounding difference was equally important. Charlotte finished with 53 rebounds compared with 33 for Philadelphia. The Hornets also recorded 34 assists, showing that their offensive success came from more than individual shot-making.
For Philadelphia, Kelly Oubre Jr. scored 17 points and Quentin Grimes added 16. Tyrese Maxey contributed seven assists but scored only six points on 3-of-12 shooting. On Charlotte’s side, Brandon Miller produced an outstanding shooting performance, making 9 of 11 field-goal attempts, 6 of 8 three-pointers and all six of his free throws.
76ers vs charlotte hornets match player stats: Game Overview
The matchup took place at Spectrum Center in Charlotte, North Carolina. The supplied game data identifies the date as January 27, 2026, while the official game record lists the contest as January 26, 2026. The statistical information remains consistent with the game described here.
Charlotte entered the contest with a 19-28 record and a 9-13 home record. Philadelphia entered with a 24-21 record and a 12-8 road record.
Despite Philadelphia having the better overall record, Charlotte controlled the game almost immediately.
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
| Philadelphia 76ers | 22 | 22 | 15 | 34 | 93 |
| Charlotte Hornets | 28 | 41 | 40 | 21 | 130 |
The first quarter was competitive, but Charlotte quickly established control.
The Hornets scored 41 points in the second quarter while Philadelphia scored only 22. That gave Charlotte a 25-point halftime lead.
The third quarter made the game even more one-sided. Charlotte scored 40 points while Philadelphia managed only 15. By the start of the fourth quarter, the Hornets had built a 50-point advantage.
Philadelphia improved offensively in the final period, scoring 34 points, but the game had already been decided.
Complete Team Statistical Comparison
The team numbers provide a strong explanation for the 37-point difference.
| Category | Philadelphia 76ers | Charlotte Hornets |
| Points | 93 | 130 |
| Field Goals | 35-89 | 47-83 |
| Field Goal Percentage | 39% | 57% |
| Three-Pointers | 9-30 | 17-41 |
| Three-Point Percentage | 30% | 41% |
| Free Throws | 14-19 | 19-27 |
| Free Throw Percentage | 74% | 70% |
| Rebounds | 33 | 53 |
| Offensive Rebounds | 12 | 14 |
| Defensive Rebounds | 21 | 39 |
| Assists | 20 | 34 |
| Turnovers | 17 | 23 |
| Steals | 14 | 8 |
| Blocks | 3 | 4 |
| Personal Fouls | 21 | 22 |
Charlotte made 47 field goals from 83 attempts.
Philadelphia made only 35 from 89 attempts.
That means Charlotte made 12 more shots while taking six fewer attempts. This is one of the clearest statistical reasons behind the final result.
The three-point difference was also substantial. Charlotte made 17 three-pointers, while Philadelphia made only nine. That created a 24-point difference from made three-point shots alone.
Brandon Miller Leads All Scorers
Brandon Miller was the outstanding individual performer of the game.
He finished with 30 points, eight rebounds, two assists and two steals. His shooting efficiency was especially impressive.
Miller went 9-of-11 from the field, 6-of-8 from three-point range and 6-of-6 from the free-throw line.
His overall field-goal percentage was approximately 82%, while his three-point percentage was 75%.
Those numbers are remarkable even before considering the volume of his scoring.
Miller did not need a large number of possessions to reach 30 points. He converted his opportunities at an extremely high rate.
His plus/minus of +40 also reflected the impact Charlotte had while he was on the floor.
Plus/minus should never be used as the only measurement of an individual player’s performance. However, in a game that Charlotte won by 37 points, Miller’s +40 fits naturally with the overall statistical picture.
Kelly Oubre Jr. Leads Philadelphia
Kelly Oubre Jr. was Philadelphia’s leading scorer with 17 points.
He made 7 of 12 field-goal attempts and finished 1-of-4 from three-point range. He also made both of his free-throw attempts.
Oubre’s 17 points accounted for a significant portion of Philadelphia’s offensive production.
His field-goal percentage was approximately 58%, which was much better than Philadelphia’s overall 39%.
The problem was that Philadelphia did not receive enough similar production from the rest of its key players.
When a team shoots below 40% and its leading scorer produces only 17 points, the offense becomes difficult to sustain against an opponent shooting 57%.
Quentin Grimes Provides Philadelphia With Perimeter Scoring
Quentin Grimes was another bright spot for the 76ers.
He scored 16 points on 6-of-13 shooting and made four of his eight three-point attempts.
Grimes also recorded three rebounds and three assists.
His four made three-pointers were especially important because Philadelphia struggled to create consistent perimeter offense throughout the game.
Grimes shot 50% from three, which was considerably better than Philadelphia’s team rate of 30%.
His performance demonstrated that Philadelphia had individual players capable of shooting efficiently. The larger issue was the lack of consistent production across the entire lineup.
Tyrese Maxey’s Numbers Tell a Different Story
Tyrese Maxey finished the game with six points, seven assists and two rebounds.
His scoring total was unusually low for a player expected to provide significant offensive production.
Maxey shot 3-of-12 from the field and did not make a three-pointer on three attempts.
His seven assists were valuable, but Philadelphia needed more scoring from one of its primary offensive creators.
This is an important distinction when evaluating individual player statistics.
A player can contribute through playmaking even when his scoring performance is poor. Maxey’s seven assists show that he was still creating opportunities for teammates.
However, against an opponent that scored 130 points, Philadelphia needed both playmaking and efficient scoring.
LaMelo Ball Provides Playmaking for Charlotte
LaMelo Ball scored 11 points, but his influence was much broader than his scoring total.
He finished with eight assists, two rebounds and one steal.
Ball shot 4-of-12 from the field and 2-of-6 from three-point range. He also committed four turnovers.
The eight assists were significant because Charlotte finished with 34 assists as a team.
That demonstrates the Hornets were not dependent on Ball to score heavily.
Instead, he helped create opportunities for teammates while other players converted their shots efficiently.
This balance was one of Charlotte’s major strengths.
Kon Knueppel Produces an All-Around Performance
Kon Knueppel scored 12 points while shooting 5-of-9 from the field.
He made two of five three-point attempts and added eight rebounds and six assists.
His six assists were particularly valuable because they showed how Charlotte’s offensive creation was distributed across the roster.
Knueppel’s eight rebounds also contributed to the Hornets’ major advantage on the glass.
His performance is a good example of why a box score should not be judged only by the highest scoring total.
A player who contributes points, rebounds and assists can have a major influence without being the team’s leading scorer.
Ryan Kalkbrenner Controls the Interior
Ryan Kalkbrenner finished with 13 points, nine rebounds, three assists and three blocks.
He shot 6-of-8 from the field.
His 75% shooting helped Charlotte maintain its exceptional team efficiency.
The nine rebounds were also important because Charlotte dominated the overall rebounding battle.
Kalkbrenner’s three blocks gave the Hornets additional protection around the basket.
His performance combined efficient scoring with interior defense and rebounding, making him one of Charlotte’s most complete contributors.
Moussa Diabate Adds Efficient Scoring
Moussa Diabate scored 12 points on 6-of-7 shooting.
That equates to a field-goal percentage of approximately 86%.
He also collected five rebounds.
Diabate’s performance was another example of Charlotte’s efficient offense.
The Hornets did not need every player to take a large number of shots. Instead, several players converted their opportunities at high rates.
That helped Charlotte maintain offensive efficiency while also spreading scoring responsibility across the roster.
Miles Bridges Makes a Balanced Contribution
Miles Bridges finished with 10 points, three rebounds and three assists.
He shot 4-of-7 from the field and made one of three attempts from three-point range.
His contribution was not as large as Miller’s, but it helped Charlotte achieve a balanced scoring distribution.
All five of Charlotte’s primary starters reached double figures.
That made it difficult for Philadelphia to focus its defensive attention on one player.
Charlotte’s Supporting Cast Matters
The Hornets also received strong production from their supporting players.
Josh Green scored 12 points.
Pat Connaughton scored 10.
Ryan Kalkbrenner added 13.
Several other Charlotte players also contributed during the blowout.
This depth helped Charlotte maintain control throughout the game.
When a team has several players capable of scoring efficiently, the defense cannot easily remove the entire offense by concentrating on one player.
That was particularly evident in the second and third quarters.
Andre Drummond’s Interior Contribution
Andre Drummond scored four points, grabbed seven rebounds and recorded two blocks.
He shot 2-of-3 from the field.
His seven rebounds were useful, but Philadelphia needed more overall production because Charlotte had such a large advantage on the boards.
Drummond’s two blocks also showed that Philadelphia had some defensive activity around the basket.
However, the 20-rebound team deficit remained one of the most important factors in the outcome.
The Rebounding Battle Was a Major Difference
Charlotte finished with 53 rebounds.
Philadelphia finished with 33.
That is a difference of 20 rebounds.
The offensive rebounding numbers were relatively close.
Charlotte had 14 offensive rebounds.
Philadelphia had 12.
The much larger difference came on the defensive glass.
Charlotte collected 39 defensive rebounds.
Philadelphia collected only 21.
Defensive rebounding is often overlooked when people focus on scoring statistics, but it has a direct effect on possession control.
When a team secures a defensive rebound, it ends the opponent’s possession.
When it fails to do so, the opponent can receive another scoring opportunity.
Charlotte’s 39 defensive rebounds helped prevent Philadelphia from creating repeated second chances.
Charlotte’s Shooting Was Extremely Efficient
The shooting numbers are among the strongest indicators of the result.
Charlotte shot 47-of-83 from the field.
Philadelphia shot 35-of-89.
Charlotte therefore made 56.6% of its field-goal attempts, while Philadelphia made approximately 39.3%.
That is a gap of more than 17 percentage points.
The three-point numbers were also strongly in Charlotte’s favor.
Charlotte shot 17-of-41 from three.
Philadelphia shot 9-of-30.
Charlotte’s 41% three-point shooting gave the Hornets an additional source of efficient scoring.
Philadelphia’s 30% rate made it much harder to keep pace.
The Three-Point Difference Created a Large Scoring Gap
Charlotte made eight more three-pointers than Philadelphia.
Each made three-pointer is worth three points, so the difference produced 24 additional points for the Hornets from made threes.
This does not mean every three-point difference directly represents the final margin because basketball possessions interact with one another.
However, it demonstrates how quickly the shooting gap can grow.
Charlotte’s 17 made threes accounted for 51 points.
Philadelphia’s nine made threes accounted for 27 points.
The difference was substantial.
Ball Movement Helped Charlotte’s Offense
Charlotte recorded 34 assists.
Philadelphia recorded 20.
That means the Hornets produced 14 more assists than the 76ers.
LaMelo Ball led Charlotte with eight assists.
Kon Knueppel added six.
Other players also contributed to the team’s passing numbers.
The result was an offense that could create opportunities from multiple positions.
Philadelphia’s 20 assists were not terrible in isolation, but they were significantly below Charlotte’s total.
When combined with the shooting percentages, the assist difference becomes more meaningful.
Charlotte was not only making shots. The team was creating a large number of efficient opportunities.
Philadelphia Forced More Steals
One interesting statistic was Philadelphia’s advantage in steals.
The 76ers recorded 14 steals.
Charlotte recorded eight.
At first glance, that might seem like Philadelphia should have been able to stay closer.
However, turnovers and steals are only one part of the possession equation.
Philadelphia still struggled to convert enough offensive opportunities into points.
The 76ers also committed 17 turnovers, while Charlotte committed 23.
Although Charlotte turned the ball over more frequently, its superior shooting and rebounding were strong enough to overcome that disadvantage.
This is an excellent example of why individual statistics should not be interpreted in isolation.
The Second Quarter Changed the Game
The first quarter ended with Charlotte ahead 28-22.
Philadelphia was still within striking distance.
Then Charlotte exploded for 41 points in the second quarter.
Philadelphia scored only 22.
The Hornets therefore won the quarter by 19 points.
A six-point deficit became a 25-point halftime deficit.
This was the turning point.
Charlotte’s offense became increasingly efficient while Philadelphia struggled to generate consistent scoring.
The Third Quarter Put the Game Away
If the second quarter created the separation, the third quarter ended the contest.
Charlotte scored 40 points.
Philadelphia scored 15.
The Hornets therefore won the quarter by 25 points.
A team cannot normally recover from a 50-point deficit after three quarters, especially when the opponent is shooting efficiently and controlling the boards.
Philadelphia eventually scored 34 points in the fourth quarter, but Charlotte was able to reduce its offensive intensity because the result was already effectively decided.
Why Philadelphia Lost
The loss cannot be attributed to one player.
Several statistical problems combined to produce the result.
Poor Field-Goal Shooting
Philadelphia shot only 39% from the field.
Charlotte shot 57%.
The difference was too large to overcome.
Weak Three-Point Shooting
Philadelphia made nine of 30 three-point attempts.
Charlotte made 17 of 41.
The eight-made-three difference created a substantial scoring advantage.
Rebounding Deficit
Charlotte won the rebounding battle 53-33.
The 20-rebound gap reduced Philadelphia’s opportunities and helped Charlotte control possessions.
Limited Production From Key Scorers
Oubre led Philadelphia with 17 points.
Grimes had 16.
Maxey scored six.
Edgecombe scored nine.
Drummond scored four.
Philadelphia needed more scoring from its primary players.
Charlotte’s Balanced Attack
Charlotte had multiple double-digit scorers.
Miller led with 30, while several teammates provided 10 or more points.
That balance prevented Philadelphia from focusing exclusively on one scorer.
Why Charlotte Won
Charlotte’s victory was based on four major strengths.
First, the Hornets shot extremely well.
Second, they controlled the defensive glass.
Third, they moved the ball effectively.
Fourth, several players contributed meaningful scoring.
Miller’s 30 points were the headline performance, but the team result came from a much larger collection of contributions.
The 34 assists demonstrate strong offensive connectivity.
The 53 rebounds demonstrate physical control.
The 57% field-goal percentage demonstrates superior shot efficiency.
The 17 made three-pointers demonstrate perimeter success.
Together, these numbers explain the 130 points.
What the Matchup Shows About Player Evaluation
One of the most useful lessons from this game is that scoring alone does not provide a complete picture of player performance.
Miller scored 30 points, but he also grabbed eight rebounds and made six three-pointers.
Knueppel scored only 12 points, but he added eight rebounds and six assists.
Kalkbrenner scored 13 points, but he also recorded nine rebounds and three blocks.
Ball scored 11 points, but his eight assists helped generate offense for teammates.
On Philadelphia’s side, Maxey scored only six points, but his seven assists demonstrate that his contribution was not limited to scoring.
This is why a complete statistical evaluation should include scoring, efficiency, rebounds, assists, steals, blocks and shooting volume.
Fantasy Basketball Takeaways
The game also provides useful lessons for fantasy basketball analysis.
Miller’s performance was obviously valuable because he combined high scoring with elite shooting efficiency and eight rebounds.
Knueppel’s eight rebounds and six assists increased his all-around value.
Kalkbrenner’s nine rebounds and three blocks made his 13-point performance more valuable in category-based formats.
Ball’s eight assists also provided important production even though his scoring was modest.
For Philadelphia, Maxey’s seven assists provided some value, but his six points and 3-of-12 shooting limited his overall impact.
Grimes was one of the stronger Philadelphia contributors because he combined 16 points with four made three-pointers, three rebounds and three assists.
Head-to-Head Season Context
The supplied matchup data shows that Charlotte had previously defeated Philadelphia 125-121 on October 26, 2025.
The January meeting therefore represented another important contest between the two teams.
The supplied data also lists a later Philadelphia victory over Charlotte, with the 76ers winning 118-114 in March 2026.
That later result provides useful context.
The January 130-93 result was extremely one-sided, but it did not define every game between the teams during the season.
NBA matchups can change significantly based on shooting performance, player availability, rotations and game-specific defensive strategies.
How to Read This Box Score Correctly
A useful way to study an NBA game is to move from the broadest information to the most detailed.
Start with the final score.
Then examine quarter scoring.
After that, compare shooting percentages.
Next, examine three-point production.
Then look at rebounds and assists.
Finally, study individual player statistics.
Following this order prevents isolated numbers from creating a misleading impression.
For example, Philadelphia recorded 14 steals, which looks positive.
But the Hornets still won by 37.
Why?
Because Charlotte’s shooting, rebounding and offensive execution were much stronger.
The same principle applies to individual players.
A player can score 15 or 20 points while still having a limited overall impact if the efficiency is poor.
Another player can score fewer points but contribute through rebounds, assists and defense.
Most Important Numbers From the Game
Several statistics stand above the rest.
Charlotte scored 130 points.
Philadelphia scored 93.
Charlotte shot 57%.
Philadelphia shot 39%.
Charlotte made 17 three-pointers.
Philadelphia made nine.
Charlotte collected 53 rebounds.
Philadelphia collected 33.
Charlotte recorded 34 assists.
Philadelphia recorded 20.
Brandon Miller scored 30 points.
Kelly Oubre Jr. scored 17.
Quentin Grimes scored 16.
Tyrese Maxey scored six and added seven assists.
These numbers provide a concise summary of the game.
Who Was the Player of the Game?
Brandon Miller was the clear choice.
His 30 points led every player on the court.
His shooting efficiency was exceptional.
He made 9-of-11 field goals, 6-of-8 three-pointers and all six free throws.
He also added eight rebounds and two steals.
His +40 plus/minus further reflected Charlotte’s dominance during his minutes.
The combination of scoring volume, efficiency and supporting statistics made Miller the standout performer.
Who Was Philadelphia’s Best Performer?
Kelly Oubre Jr. led the 76ers with 17 points.
His 7-of-12 shooting showed strong individual efficiency despite the team’s poor overall shooting night.
Quentin Grimes was another positive contributor with 16 points and four made three-pointers.
Neither performance was enough to overcome Charlotte’s team-wide efficiency.
What Should Fans Take Away From the Game?
The biggest lesson is that Charlotte did not win simply because Brandon Miller scored 30 points.
The Hornets won because multiple statistical advantages reinforced one another.
They shot better.
They rebounded better.
They passed better.
They made more three-pointers.
They received balanced scoring.
They controlled the game for most of its duration.
Philadelphia had individual contributions, but not enough collective efficiency.
That distinction is important.
Basketball is a five-player sport, and the box score often becomes most useful when individual performances are connected to team-level statistics.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who led the 76ers in scoring?
Kelly Oubre Jr. led Philadelphia with 17 points. Quentin Grimes was second with 16 points.
Who scored the most points for Charlotte?
Brandon Miller led Charlotte and all players in the game with 30 points.
What was the final score?
Charlotte defeated Philadelphia 130-93.
How many points did Tyrese Maxey score?
Tyrese Maxey scored six points and recorded seven assists and two rebounds.
How many rebounds did Charlotte have?
Charlotte finished with 53 total rebounds, while Philadelphia had 33.
What was the biggest statistical difference?
The largest major team differences came in field-goal shooting and rebounding. Charlotte shot 57% compared with Philadelphia’s 39% and outrebounded the 76ers 53-33.
Conclusion
The 76ers vs charlotte hornets match player stats show a game in which Charlotte dominated both efficiency and possession control.
Brandon Miller delivered the most impressive individual performance with 30 points on 9-of-11 shooting, including six three-pointers. Kelly Oubre Jr. led Philadelphia with 17 points, while Quentin Grimes added 16.
The team statistics explain the final 130-93 score even more clearly.
Charlotte shot 57% from the field compared with Philadelphia’s 39%. The Hornets made 17 three-pointers compared with nine from the 76ers. Charlotte also won the rebounding battle 53-33 and recorded 34 assists compared with Philadelphia’s 20.
The quarter-by-quarter breakdown shows when the game changed. Charlotte led by six after the opening period, expanded the advantage to 25 points by halftime and then scored 40 points in the third quarter to build a 50-point lead.
Philadelphia’s fourth-quarter improvement could not change the outcome.
From an individual perspective, Miller was the obvious standout, but Charlotte’s victory was a complete team performance. Ball’s eight assists, Knueppel’s eight rebounds and six assists, Kalkbrenner’s nine rebounds and three blocks, and the contributions from several other players demonstrate how widely the production was distributed.
For Philadelphia, the game highlighted the importance of getting consistent scoring from its leading offensive players while improving shooting efficiency and defensive rebounding.
Ultimately, the statistics show that Charlotte won through a combination of elite shooting, strong rebounding, effective ball movement and balanced scoring. The 37-point margin was not the result of one isolated advantage. It was the cumulative effect of several statistical areas going in the Hornets’ favor.
