Las Vegas Raiders vs Seahawks Match Player Stats

The las vegas raiders vs seahawks match player stats from the NFL preseason game on August 8, 2025, tell the story of a contest that was far more competitive than many expected. Although preseason games are primarily designed to evaluate players and test different combinations, this matchup delivered plenty of meaningful performances on both sides. The game ended in a 23 to 23 tie, giving both teams a 0 0 1 preseason record while providing coaches with valuable insight into quarterback depth, defensive execution, and special teams consistency. Rather than focusing only on the final score, a closer look at the numbers reveals which players capitalized on their opportunities and which areas still need improvement before the regular season begins.

For anyone analyzing preseason football, statistics should always be viewed in context. Coaches rotate players frequently, many starters see limited action, and young prospects often play extended snaps. Even so, standout performances often hint at future roster decisions. This game was an excellent example of how individual contributions can shape a team’s preseason outlook despite the absence of regular season intensity.

Match Overview

Category	Details
Competition	NFL Preseason
Date	August 8, 2025
Venue	Seattle Seahawks Home Stadium
Final Score	Las Vegas Raiders 23, Seattle Seahawks 23
Result	Tie
Raiders Record	0 0 1
Seahawks Record	0 0 1

The contest featured momentum swings throughout all four quarters. Seattle controlled much of the first half, while Las Vegas mounted an impressive comeback after halftime.

Quarter by Quarter Score

Quarter	Raiders	Seahawks
First	0	7
Second	3	9
Third	7	0
Fourth	13	7
Final	23	23

Seattle established an early advantage with efficient offense and solid defensive pressure. However, the Raiders adjusted well after halftime, particularly through improved quarterback play and more productive passing drives.

Las Vegas Raiders vs Seahawks Match Player Stats Breakdown

Statistics alone rarely tell the complete story, but they become extremely valuable when combined with game context. In this matchup, offensive efficiency, defensive pressure, turnover creation, and special teams execution all influenced the outcome.

Team Passing Comparison

Team	Comp/Att	Yards	TD	INT	Rating
Raiders	25/40	288	2	2	80.8
Seahawks	18/32	198	1	1	73.4

Las Vegas generated nearly 90 more passing yards than Seattle despite throwing two interceptions. Their willingness to attack vertically created more explosive plays during the second half.

Seattle’s passing attack was more conservative, relying on shorter completions while leaning heavily on the running game.

Raiders Quarterback Performance

One of the biggest talking points from this preseason contest was the evaluation of the Raiders’ quarterbacks.

Aidan O’Connell

Statistic	Value
Completions	18
Attempts	30
Passing Yards	205
Passing TD	1
Interceptions	2

O’Connell moved the offense consistently between the twenties but struggled with turnovers. His two interceptions prevented several promising drives from ending with points. Despite those mistakes, he still produced over 200 passing yards, showing confidence within the offensive system.

Cam Miller Impresses

Statistic	Value
Completions	6
Attempts	7
Passing Yards	76
Passing TD	1
Interceptions	0
Passer Rating	151.5

Cam Miller delivered arguably the most efficient quarterback performance of the evening. Completing six of seven passes while throwing a touchdown without an interception demonstrated exceptional decision making.

Although the sample size was small, Miller maximized every opportunity, exactly what coaches hope to see from developmental quarterbacks during preseason action.

Seahawks Quarterback Analysis

Seattle rotated quarterbacks throughout the game, giving Drew Lock extended playing time.

Drew Lock

Statistic	Value
Completions	12
Attempts	22
Passing Yards	147
Passing TD	1
Interceptions	1

Lock managed the offense effectively for stretches, especially during the opening half when Seattle built its lead.

His touchdown pass highlighted good pocket awareness, although the interception reminded everyone that ball security remains an area requiring improvement.

Overall, Lock’s performance was steady rather than spectacular.

Comparing the Ground Games

Running efficiency often determines whether an offense stays balanced.

Team Rushing Statistics

Team	Carries	Yards	Average	TD
Raiders	26	104	4.0	0
Seahawks	32	170	5.3	2

Seattle clearly controlled the ground game.

Their offensive line consistently created running lanes, allowing multiple backs to contribute productive carries throughout the contest.

Las Vegas managed respectable efficiency but never established the same level of dominance.

Raiders Leading Rusher

Chris Collier

• 9 carries
• 42 rushing yards

Collier showed good balance and vision despite limited opportunities.

Seahawks Leading Rusher

George Holani

• 7 carries
• 61 rushing yards
• 1 rushing touchdown

Holani was among Seattle’s brightest performers. His acceleration through the second level repeatedly produced positive gains and demonstrated why productive preseason performances can influence roster decisions.

Receiving Leaders

Explosive receiving plays helped shape offensive momentum.

Raiders Receiving Leader

Shedrick Jackson

• 4 receptions
• 76 receiving yards
• 1 touchdown

Jackson consistently created separation and made several important catches during the comeback effort.

His touchdown reception highlighted both speed and reliable hands.

Seahawks Receiving Leader

Tory Horton

• 3 receptions
• 31 receiving yards
• 1 touchdown

Although Horton accumulated fewer yards, he made his biggest contribution inside the red zone by catching a touchdown pass.

His versatility also appeared on special teams later in the game.

Offensive Comparison

Looking beyond individual players, the offenses displayed different philosophies.

Las Vegas relied more heavily on passing, finishing with 288 passing yards compared to Seattle’s 198.

Seattle countered with superior rushing production, finishing with 170 rushing yards, demonstrating a balanced offensive approach that consistently controlled field position.

The contrast between aerial aggression and rushing efficiency became one of the defining themes of the matchup.

Defensive Performance Analysis

While offensive statistics often receive the most attention, the defensive numbers from this preseason matchup reveal which units consistently disrupted opposing drives. Both teams generated pressure, forced mistakes, and produced several momentum changing plays.

The Raiders finished with 64 total tackles, while Seattle recorded 67 total tackles. Although the difference was small, Seattle’s defense spent slightly more time on the field because Las Vegas sustained longer offensive drives through the air.

Team Defensive Statistics

Category	Raiders	Seahawks
Total Tackles	64	67
Solo Tackles	43	38
Sacks	1	1
Tackles for Loss	1	5
Pass Deflections	5	5
Quarterback Hits	2	7

One statistic immediately stands out. Seattle generated seven quarterback hits, compared to only two by the Raiders. This indicates the Seahawks’ defensive front consistently pressured Las Vegas quarterbacks, even when sacks did not occur.

The five tackles for loss also demonstrate that Seattle’s defenders reacted quickly against running plays and screen passes, limiting offensive gains before they developed.

Las Vegas, meanwhile, showed discipline in open field tackling. Recording 43 solo tackles reflects defenders who finished plays without requiring significant assistance from teammates.

Turnovers and Ball Security

Turnovers remain one of the most important indicators of winning football, regardless of whether the game is played in preseason or the regular season.

Raiders Turnovers

The Raiders committed two interceptions through the passing game but protected the football well in every other area.

Notably, Las Vegas finished the game without a single fumble, an encouraging sign considering how frequently preseason games feature ball security issues.

Seahawks Turnovers

Seattle threw one interception and recorded one fumble.

However, the Seahawks successfully recovered their own loose ball, preventing the turnover from changing possession.

Although Seattle technically put the football on the ground once, recovering it minimized the damage.

Defensive Takeaways

The secondary on both teams made impactful plays.

Raiders

• 1 interception
• Isaiah Pola Mao secured the takeaway

Seahawks

• 2 interceptions
• Josh Jobe
• Nehemiah Pritchett

Seattle’s defensive backs capitalized on inaccurate throws and showed strong awareness when attacking the football.

For Las Vegas, Isaiah Pola Mao’s interception demonstrated good anticipation and reinforced his ability to make plays in coverage.

Special Teams Performance

Preseason football often becomes a showcase for specialists competing for roster spots. This game was no exception, with both kickers and punters delivering memorable performances.

Raiders Kicking Statistics

Daniel Carlson once again demonstrated why he remains one of the NFL’s most dependable kickers.

Statistic	Value
Field Goals	3 of 5
Longest Field Goal	56 yards
Extra Points	2 of 2
Total Points	11

Carlson’s successful 56 yard field goal was among the game’s biggest highlights.

Even though he missed two attempts, converting from long distance continues to demonstrate elite leg strength.

Seahawks Kicking Statistics

Jason Myers produced an efficient evening.

Statistic	Value
Field Goals	1 of 1
Longest Field Goal	48 yards
Extra Points	2 of 3
Total Points	5

The missed extra point ultimately mattered because Seattle finished in a tie. While preseason results are secondary to player evaluation, coaches still examine every missed scoring opportunity.

Punting Battle

Field position often begins with quality punting.

Raiders

AJ Cole

• 2 punts
• 83 total yards
• 41.5 yard average
• Longest punt 52 yards

Cole delivered a steady performance, although he was not heavily involved because Las Vegas sustained several productive drives.

Seahawks

Michael Dickson

• 4 punts
• 222 total yards
• 55.5 yard average
• Longest punt 77 yards

Dickson produced one of the strongest punting performances of the preseason.

His 77 yard punt dramatically changed field position and reminded everyone why field flipping specialists remain valuable assets.

Kick Return Comparison

Special teams extend beyond kicking.

Raiders Kick Returns

• 2 returns
• 61 yards
• 30.5 yard average

Las Vegas consistently generated favorable starting field position after kickoffs.

A return average above 30 yards reflects decisive running and effective blocking.

Seahawks Kick Returns

• 3 returns
• 51 yards
• 17.0 yard average

Seattle’s return unit never found significant running lanes.

The Raiders’ coverage team deserves credit for limiting explosive returns.

Punt Return Production

Raiders

Dylan Laube

• 2 punt returns
• 20 yards

Laube consistently secured the football while adding positive yardage after each catch.

Seahawks

Tory Horton

• 1 punt return
• 5 yards

Although his punt return production was limited, Horton contributed more significantly as a receiver earlier in the game.

Players Who Improved Their Stock

One of the primary objectives of preseason football is identifying players who deserve expanded opportunities.

Several individuals used this matchup to strengthen their position.

Cam Miller

Few players made a stronger impression than Cam Miller.

His efficiency, accuracy, and composure under pressure created optimism about his long term development.

Completing six of seven passes while producing a touchdown without committing a turnover is exactly the type of performance coaches hope to see from a young quarterback.

George Holani

Holani consistently gained positive yardage and finished with 61 rushing yards and one touchdown.

His vision between the tackles and ability to accelerate into open space made him Seattle’s most productive runner.

Shedrick Jackson

Jackson emerged as the Raiders’ most dangerous receiving option.

His 76 receiving yards and touchdown reflected reliable route running and dependable hands.

Wide receivers often need standout preseason performances to secure roster positions, and Jackson delivered one.

Michael Dickson

Although punters rarely receive headlines, Dickson’s field position impact should not be overlooked.

A 55.5 yard average with a 77 yard punt represents elite production in any football game.

Areas Each Team Can Improve

Even competitive preseason games expose weaknesses that coaching staffs immediately address.

Las Vegas Raiders

The Raiders should prioritize:

• Reducing interceptions
• Improving pass protection against aggressive defensive fronts
• Creating more consistent rushing production near the goal line
• Finishing drives more efficiently

Seattle Seahawks

Seattle’s coaching staff will likely focus on:

• Increasing passing consistency
• Limiting defensive penalties and unnecessary pressure situations
• Improving kickoff return efficiency
• Converting every extra point opportunity

What the Statistics Really Tell Us

Looking beyond the box score reveals an interesting contrast between these teams.

Las Vegas displayed greater success through the passing game, accumulating nearly 300 passing yards despite multiple quarterback rotations.

Seattle responded with a physical rushing attack that averaged 5.3 yards per carry, showing impressive offensive line execution.

Defensively, the Seahawks consistently pressured quarterbacks, while the Raiders emphasized tackling discipline and prevented explosive passing plays for much of the contest.

Rather than indicating one clearly superior team, the statistics show two clubs with different strengths entering the remainder of the preseason.

Key Takeaways from the Las Vegas Raiders vs Seahawks Match Player Stats

The las vegas raiders vs seahawks match player stats highlight a preseason game in which both coaching staffs gained valuable information about their rosters. Although the final score ended in a 23 to 23 tie, the individual performances provided clearer answers than the scoreboard alone.

Some of the most important observations include:

• Las Vegas generated a more productive passing attack with 288 team passing yards.
• Seattle dominated on the ground with 170 rushing yards and two rushing touchdowns.
• Cam Miller delivered the most efficient quarterback performance of the game.
• George Holani emerged as Seattle’s leading offensive playmaker on the ground.
• Shedrick Jackson proved to be a reliable deep receiving threat.
• Daniel Carlson demonstrated outstanding range with a successful 56 yard field goal.
• Michael Dickson consistently flipped field position through elite punting.
• Seattle’s defense created more pressure, recording seven quarterback hits and five tackles for loss.

Taken together, these performances suggest that both teams have promising young talent capable of contributing beyond the preseason.

What This Game Means Going Forward

Preseason results rarely predict regular season success, but they often reveal which players are prepared for larger roles.

For the Raiders, the biggest positive was offensive depth. Even with quarterback rotations and two interceptions, the offense still produced nearly 300 passing yards and successfully erased a double digit deficit during the second half. Young receivers also made the most of their opportunities, giving the coaching staff additional confidence in the depth chart.

Seattle can be encouraged by the effectiveness of its running game. Averaging more than five yards per carry reflects strong blocking and decisive running, both of which are encouraging signs regardless of preseason competition. The defensive front also consistently disrupted opposing quarterbacks, an area that can translate well into meaningful regular season games.

Neither team leaves this contest with concerns about effort. Instead, both organizations have a clearer understanding of which players deserve increased opportunities in upcoming preseason games and which areas require additional refinement.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who was the leading passer in the game?

Cam Miller was the Raiders’ most efficient passer, completing 6 of 7 passes for 76 yards, one touchdown, no interceptions, and a 151.5 passer rating. Drew Lock led Seattle with 147 passing yards and one touchdown.

Who had the most rushing yards?

George Holani led all rushers with 61 yards on seven carries and scored one rushing touchdown. Chris Collier led the Raiders with 42 rushing yards.

Who recorded the most receiving yards?

Shedrick Jackson led all receivers with four catches for 76 yards and one touchdown, making him the most productive receiver in the game.

Why did the game end in a tie?

The preseason matchup finished 23 to 23 after both teams scored late in the fourth quarter. NFL preseason games can end in a tie if neither team gains an advantage by the end of overtime rules or if overtime is not played under the applicable preseason format.

Which defense performed better statistically?

Seattle generated more quarterback pressure with seven QB hits and five tackles for loss, while Las Vegas excelled in solo tackling and forced one interception. Both defenses had productive moments throughout the game.

Which special teams player had the biggest impact?

Michael Dickson produced an outstanding punting performance with a 55.5 yard average, while Daniel Carlson contributed 11 points for the Raiders, including a successful 56 yard field goal.

Conclusion

The las vegas raiders vs seahawks match player stats provide a comprehensive picture of a competitive preseason contest that finished in a 23 to 23 tie. Las Vegas showcased an effective passing attack led by efficient quarterback play in the second half, while Seattle demonstrated its strength on the ground with an explosive rushing performance. Defensively, both teams forced key turnovers and created pressure at important moments, and special teams also played a meaningful role through long field goals and excellent punting.

Beyond the final score, this matchup served its primary preseason purpose by helping coaches evaluate young talent, test roster depth, and identify areas for improvement before the regular season. Several players strengthened their cases for larger roles, while the statistical trends from this game offer useful insight into how both teams may continue to develop throughout the preseason.