Las Vegas Raiders vs New England Patriots Match Player Stats
The las vegas raiders vs new england patriots match player stats from September 7, 2025, tell the story of a game that was decided by passing efficiency, explosive completions, red zone execution, and the Raiders’ ability to turn a strong aerial performance into a 20-13 road victory. Las Vegas finished with a 1-0 record after controlling the second half, while New England opened the season at 0-1 despite holding advantages in total rushing attempts, receptions, and several defensive categories.
The final score was Las Vegas Raiders 20, New England Patriots 13. The Raiders and Patriots were tied 7-7 after the first quarter, but Las Vegas created separation in the third quarter by scoring 10 unanswered points. New England managed only three points in both the second and fourth quarters, leaving the Patriots unable to match the Raiders’ second-half production.
For readers studying the las vegas raiders vs new england patriots match player stats, the most important detail is the contrast between the two offensive approaches. Geno Smith produced 362 passing yards on 34 attempts, while Drake Maye completed 30 of 46 passes for 287 yards. Las Vegas struggled to establish the run, but its passing game produced enough explosive plays to compensate. New England generated 60 rushing yards and completed more passes, yet its offense produced fewer total passing yards and only 13 points.
This breakdown examines the individual performances, team statistics, defensive contributions, special teams numbers, and tactical lessons from the game.
Las Vegas Raiders vs New England Patriots Match Player Stats: Game Overview
The Raiders entered the game and immediately demonstrated why passing efficiency could become the defining factor. Geno Smith completed 24 of 34 passes for 362 yards, one touchdown, and one interception. His passer rating was 102.8.
Drake Maye had a higher completion total, finishing 30 of 46, but his 287 passing yards were 75 fewer than Smith’s total. Maye also threw one touchdown and one interception, resulting in an 80.6 passer rating.
The difference in passing production was significant because neither rushing attack was especially effective.
Final Score and Quarter-by-Quarter Breakdown
| Quarter | Raiders | Patriots |
| Q1 | 7 | 7 |
| Q2 | 0 | 3 |
| Q3 | 10 | 0 |
| Q4 | 3 | 3 |
| Final | 20 | 13 |
The opening quarter produced an even 7-7 score. New England then added three points in the second quarter to take a 10-7 halftime lead.
The game changed after halftime.
Las Vegas scored 10 points in the third quarter while the Patriots were held scoreless. That swing gave the Raiders a 17-10 advantage entering the final period. Each team scored three points in the fourth quarter, leaving Las Vegas with the seven-point victory.
The scoring pattern shows that this was not simply a game where one team dominated from start to finish. New England had the halftime advantage, but Las Vegas produced the stronger second-half response.
Geno Smith’s Passing Performance
Geno Smith was the statistical centerpiece of the Raiders’ offense.
He finished with:
| Statistic | Geno Smith |
| Completions | 24 |
| Attempts | 34 |
| Completion Rate | 70.6% |
| Passing Yards | 362 |
| Passing TDs | 1 |
| Interceptions | 1 |
| Passer Rating | 102.8 |
Smith averaged more than 10.6 yards per pass attempt based on his 362 yards over 34 attempts. That figure highlights the vertical and intermediate effectiveness of the Raiders’ passing attack.
The most notable feature of his performance was not simply his completion percentage. It was the amount of yardage generated from relatively modest volume.
Smith attempted 34 passes and produced 362 yards. New England’s Drake Maye attempted 46 passes and finished with 287 yards.
That difference matters when evaluating quarterback efficiency. Maye completed six more passes, but Smith produced 75 more passing yards on 12 fewer attempts.
Smith’s Impact on the Game
The Raiders did not need Smith to produce an enormous number of completions. Instead, they benefited from chunk gains.
Brock Bowers was one of the biggest beneficiaries of the passing attack, recording five receptions for 103 yards. His 20.6 yards per reception average gave the Raiders another major source of explosive production.
Smith did throw an interception, so the performance was not flawless. However, his 102.8 passer rating and 362-yard output demonstrate how effectively the Raiders generated yardage through the air.
Drake Maye’s Performance for New England
Drake Maye had a high-volume passing game for the Patriots.
His final numbers were:
| Statistic | Drake Maye |
| Completions | 30 |
| Attempts | 46 |
| Completion Rate | 65.2% |
| Passing Yards | 287 |
| Passing TDs | 1 |
| Interceptions | 1 |
| Passer Rating | 80.6 |
Maye’s 30 completions represented a significant portion of New England’s offensive production. However, the Patriots averaged only 9.6 yards per completed reception across their receiving totals.
The issue was not necessarily an inability to complete passes. New England completed 30 passes but did not turn those completions into enough yardage or points.
The 46 attempts also indicate that the Patriots relied heavily on Maye to move the offense. Against a Raiders defense that registered four sacks and nine quarterback hits, maintaining consistent offensive efficiency became difficult.
Maye and the Patriots Passing Volume
New England’s receiving statistics show 45 total targets and 30 receptions. That is a substantially higher target count than Las Vegas, which recorded 33 targets and 24 receptions.
Yet Las Vegas generated 362 receiving yards compared with 287 for New England.
This is an important distinction for anyone analyzing the game beyond the box score. More completions and targets did not automatically produce more offensive output.
Ashton Jeanty’s Rushing Performance
Ashton Jeanty led the Raiders in rushing with 19 carries for 38 yards and one touchdown.
His numbers were:
| Statistic | Ashton Jeanty |
| Carries | 19 |
| Rushing Yards | 38 |
| Average | 2.0 |
| Longest Run | 9 yards |
| Rushing TD | 1 |
The 2.0-yard average shows how difficult it was for Las Vegas to consistently create running room.
Despite that inefficiency, Jeanty’s touchdown gave the Raiders important scoring value from the ground game.
This is a useful example of why rushing yardage and rushing impact are not always identical. A running back can have a modest average while still producing a touchdown that directly contributes to the final result.
TreVeyon Henderson Leads Patriots Rushing
TreVeyon Henderson led New England’s rushing production.
He recorded:
| Statistic | TreVeyon Henderson |
| Carries | 5 |
| Rushing Yards | 27 |
| Average | 5.4 |
| Longest Run | 14 yards |
| Rushing TDs | 0 |
Henderson’s 5.4-yard average was considerably better than Jeanty’s 2.0-yard average.
However, the limited number of carries meant that Henderson did not have the same workload as the Raiders’ leading rusher.
New England’s overall rushing attack produced 60 yards on 18 attempts, while Las Vegas produced 56 yards on 24 attempts.
That means the Patriots were more efficient per rushing attempt, even though they did not turn that advantage into a higher final score.
Brock Bowers Breaks 100 Receiving Yards
Brock Bowers was one of the standout players in the game.
He finished with:
| Statistic | Brock Bowers |
| Receptions | 5 |
| Receiving Yards | 103 |
| Average | 20.6 |
| Longest Reception | 38 yards |
Bowers averaged 20.6 yards per reception, which was an important component of Las Vegas’ 362-yard passing performance.
His 38-yard longest reception illustrates the explosive nature of the Raiders’ passing game. When an offense can generate gains of that size, it can overcome an inefficient rushing attack.
The Raiders had only 56 rushing yards, but their receiving production allowed them to sustain offensive momentum.
Kayshon Boutte Provides New England With a Big Receiving Performance
Kayshon Boutte was the Patriots’ leading receiver by yardage.
He recorded:
| Statistic | Kayshon Boutte |
| Receptions | 6 |
| Receiving Yards | 103 |
| Average | 17.2 |
| Longest Reception | 24 yards |
Boutte matched Bowers with 103 receiving yards, but he needed six receptions to reach the total compared with Bowers’ five.
The Patriots therefore had an individual receiver capable of creating substantial yardage, but New England’s overall passing output remained below Las Vegas’ total.
The difference between the two passing games is particularly interesting because both teams had a receiver reach 103 yards.
Team Rushing Comparison
The rushing totals were relatively close:
| Team | Carries | Yards | Average | TDs | Long |
| Raiders | 24 | 56 | 2.3 | 1 | 11 |
| Patriots | 18 | 60 | 3.3 | 0 | 14 |
New England averaged a full yard more per rushing attempt than Las Vegas.
However, the Patriots did not score a rushing touchdown, while the Raiders did.
That difference helped demonstrate the importance of situational efficiency. Total yardage is useful, but points come from converting opportunities into touchdowns and field goals.
Las Vegas’ running game was inefficient overall, yet one rushing touchdown contributed directly to the 20-point total.
Team Receiving Comparison
The receiving statistics show the clearest offensive contrast.
| Team | Receptions | Yards | Average | TDs | Long | Targets |
| Raiders | 24 | 362 | 15.1 | 1 | 38 | 33 |
| Patriots | 30 | 287 | 9.6 | 1 | 27 | 45 |
The Raiders generated 75 more receiving yards despite recording six fewer receptions.
They also averaged 15.1 yards per reception compared with 9.6 for New England.
That is one of the most important statistical explanations for the final score.
Las Vegas produced fewer catches but significantly more yardage per reception. New England moved the ball through a larger number of completions, but the Raiders generated more explosive gains.
Defensive Player and Team Statistics
The defensive totals were surprisingly close in several areas.
The Raiders recorded:
- 76 total tackles
- 42 solo tackles
- 4 sacks
- 6 tackles for loss
- 4 passes defended
- 9 quarterback hits
The Patriots recorded:
- 71 total tackles
- 41 solo tackles
- 4 sacks
- 10 tackles for loss
- 5 passes defended
- 9 quarterback hits
Both teams recorded four sacks and nine quarterback hits.
New England actually produced more tackles for loss, with 10 compared with six for Las Vegas.
That suggests the Patriots’ defense was capable of creating disruption around the line of scrimmage. However, the Raiders’ offense still produced 362 passing yards.
Raiders Defensive Contribution
The Raiders’ defense recorded four sacks and generated one interception.
Isaiah Pola-Mao recorded the interception, finishing with one pick and no return yardage.
The Raiders also recorded 76 total tackles, including 42 solo tackles.
Those numbers reflect a defense that had to deal with a high-volume Patriots passing attack. New England attempted 46 passes, giving the Raiders numerous opportunities to create pressure and force difficult throws.
Patriots Defensive Contribution
The Patriots also recorded four sacks and one interception.
Jaylinn Hawkins produced the Patriots’ interception, returning it one yard.
New England’s defense recorded 10 tackles for loss, four more than the Raiders. That statistic indicates that the Patriots were successful in disrupting plays behind or near the line of scrimmage.
However, the defense still surrendered 362 passing yards.
That contrast is one of the central themes of the game: New England produced several disruptive defensive statistics, but Las Vegas created enough explosive passing plays to keep scoring.
Turnovers and Ball Security
Turnovers were relatively limited.
The Raiders recorded no fumbles and threw one interception.
The Patriots had one team fumble, listed with Drake Maye and Will Campbell, but it was not lost. Maye also threw one interception.
Therefore, neither team suffered a major fumble-related turnover disadvantage.
The interception totals were even at one apiece.
This makes the passing efficiency gap even more important because the Raiders did not win by dominating the turnover battle.
Instead, their advantage came largely from how much yardage they generated through the passing game and how effectively they converted that production into points.
Special Teams Performance
Special teams also contributed to the overall statistical picture.
Daniel Carlson
Raiders kicker Daniel Carlson finished:
| Statistic | Value |
| Field Goals | 2/3 |
| Long Field Goal | 51 yards |
| Extra Points | 2/2 |
| Points | 8 |
Carlson produced eight points, including a field goal from as far as 51 yards.
His kicking production was important because the Raiders scored only two offensive touchdowns according to the supplied scoring profile, making field goals an important part of the final total.
Andy Borregales
Patriots kicker Andy Borregales finished:
| Statistic | Value |
| Field Goals | 2/3 |
| Long Field Goal | 44 yards |
| Extra Points | 1/1 |
| Points | 7 |
Borregales also converted two field goals, but his extra-point opportunities were more limited because New England scored fewer touchdowns.
The kickers had identical field-goal records, but Carlson’s successful 51-yard attempt gave the Raiders an additional example of long-range scoring ability.
Punting Comparison
AJ Cole handled punting duties for Las Vegas.
He recorded:
- 5 punts
- 249 total yards
- 49.8-yard average
- 2 touchbacks
- 60-yard longest punt
Bryce Baringer punted for New England:
- 6 punts
- 244 total yards
- 40.7-yard average
- 2 punts inside the 20
- 59-yard longest punt
Cole averaged 9.1 yards more per punt than Baringer.
Baringer’s two punts inside the 20 were useful from a field-position perspective, but Cole’s larger average and 60-yard longest punt indicate that the Raiders generated greater raw punting distance.
Kick Returns and Punt Returns
The return game also produced useful differences.
The Raiders had three kick returns for 96 yards, averaging 32.0 yards per return with a 34-yard long.
New England recorded four kick returns for 111 yards, averaging 27.8 yards with a 41-yard long.
For punt returns, Tre Tucker recorded one return for 13 yards for Las Vegas.
Marcus Jones returned two punts for New England for 16 total yards, averaging 8.0 yards.
These numbers show that the Patriots had slightly more total kick-return yardage, while the Raiders had the better average per kick return.
Why the Passing Difference Mattered
The central statistical lesson from the las vegas raiders vs new england patriots match player stats is that efficiency can outweigh volume.
New England completed 30 passes compared with 24 for Las Vegas.
That sounds like a clear advantage until the yardage totals are considered.
Las Vegas produced 362 passing yards.
New England produced 287.
The Raiders therefore averaged significantly more yards per completion and per attempt.
The presence of Bowers at 20.6 yards per reception and a 38-yard long reception is particularly important. Explosive plays reduce the number of successful plays an offense needs to create scoring opportunities.
New England, by comparison, produced more short and intermediate completions. Boutte still produced 103 yards, but the team as a whole averaged only 9.6 yards per reception.
Why the Rushing Numbers Did Not Tell the Whole Story
The Patriots’ rushing statistics were slightly more efficient.
New England averaged 3.3 yards per rushing attempt.
Las Vegas averaged 2.3.
The Patriots also finished with four more rushing yards despite having six fewer attempts.
Yet the Raiders scored a rushing touchdown while New England did not.
This demonstrates why raw rushing efficiency cannot be viewed independently from scoring and passing production.
Las Vegas’ offense was unbalanced statistically, with only 56 rushing yards against 362 receiving yards. But the passing game was productive enough to compensate.
For New England, the offense did not generate enough explosive passing yardage to overcome the Raiders’ aerial advantage.
Second-Half Adjustment Was Crucial
The scoreboard provides one of the clearest clues about how the game changed.
At halftime, New England led 10-7.
The Patriots then failed to score in the third quarter while the Raiders scored 10 points.
That third-quarter swing transformed the game.
Las Vegas entered the final quarter with a 17-10 advantage. New England added three points in the fourth quarter, but the Raiders also added three.
The Patriots therefore never recovered the seven-point deficit.
This makes the third quarter arguably the most important scoring period from a statistical perspective, not because it produced the largest number of total points, but because it created the game’s decisive separation.
A Closer Look at Offensive Efficiency
The offensive numbers can be summarized through several key comparisons.
Quarterback Production
Smith:
- 362 yards
- 1 touchdown
- 1 interception
- 102.8 rating
Maye:
- 287 yards
- 1 touchdown
- 1 interception
- 80.6 rating
Rushing Production
Raiders:
- 56 yards
- 2.3 yards per carry
- 1 rushing touchdown
Patriots:
- 60 yards
- 3.3 yards per carry
- 0 rushing touchdowns
Receiving Production
Raiders:
- 24 receptions
- 362 yards
- 15.1 yards per reception
Patriots:
- 30 receptions
- 287 yards
- 9.6 yards per reception
Taken together, the numbers explain the result without requiring a complicated theory.
The Patriots moved the ball through volume.
The Raiders generated more production through explosive passing.
Key Individual Performances
Several players stand out when reviewing the full statistical record.
Geno Smith
Smith’s 362 passing yards were the highest passing total in the game. His 102.8 rating reflected an efficient performance despite one interception.
Brock Bowers
Bowers reached 103 receiving yards on only five receptions. His 38-yard long reception was particularly valuable to the Raiders’ explosive passing attack.
Ashton Jeanty
Jeanty had a difficult rushing night statistically, averaging 2.0 yards per carry, but he produced one rushing touchdown on 19 attempts.
Drake Maye
Maye completed 30 passes and attempted 46, making him responsible for a significant share of the Patriots’ offensive workload.
Kayshon Boutte
Boutte matched Bowers with 103 receiving yards and averaged 17.2 yards per reception.
Isaiah Pola-Mao
Pola-Mao recorded the Raiders’ only interception.
Jaylinn Hawkins
Hawkins recorded the Patriots’ interception.
Daniel Carlson
Carlson converted two field goals and two extra points for eight points.
What the Statistics Say About the Game
The las vegas raiders vs new england patriots match player stats reveal several useful conclusions.
First, the Raiders won the passing-yardage battle by a substantial margin.
Second, the Patriots won the rushing efficiency battle, but that did not translate into more points.
Third, both defenses recorded four sacks, making quarterback pressure relatively even.
Fourth, each team recorded one interception, so the turnover battle did not explain the seven-point margin.
Fifth, Las Vegas generated more explosive receiving production.
Sixth, the Raiders’ third-quarter scoring burst proved decisive after New England held a halftime lead.
These points provide a more complete explanation than simply looking at the final score.
How to Read These Player Statistics Correctly
When analyzing an NFL box score, it is tempting to identify the player with the highest number in one category and treat that as the most important performance.
That approach can be misleading.
For example, Maye completed 30 passes while Smith completed 24. A simple completion comparison would favor Maye.
But Smith produced 75 more passing yards.
Similarly, New England rushed for 60 yards while Las Vegas rushed for 56. That advantage did not translate into a higher score.
The better approach is to examine multiple connected statistics:
- Passing volume
- Passing efficiency
- Explosive plays
- Rushing efficiency
- Touchdowns
- Turnovers
- Pressure statistics
- Field-goal production
- Quarter-by-quarter scoring
When these categories are considered together, the final result becomes easier to understand.
Most Important Statistical Takeaways
The main figures from the game can be summarized as follows:
| Category | Raiders | Patriots |
| Final Score | 20 | 13 |
| Passing Yards | 362 | 287 |
| Rushing Yards | 56 | 60 |
| Passing TDs | 1 | 1 |
| Rushing TDs | 1 | 0 |
| Interceptions | 1 | 1 |
| Sacks | 4 | 4 |
| Total Tackles | 76 | 71 |
| Receiving Yards | 362 | 287 |
| Receiving Yards per Catch | 15.1 | 9.6 |
| Rushing Average | 2.3 | 3.3 |
The table reinforces the central story.
New England had some statistical advantages, particularly in rushing efficiency and tackles for loss. But Las Vegas created considerably more passing yardage and more explosive receiving production.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the final score between the Raiders and Patriots?
The Las Vegas Raiders defeated the New England Patriots 20-13 on September 7, 2025.
Who was the Raiders’ leading passer?
Geno Smith led the Raiders with 24 completions on 34 attempts for 362 yards, one touchdown, one interception, and a 102.8 passer rating.
Who led the Patriots in passing?
Drake Maye completed 30 of 46 passes for 287 yards, one touchdown, and one interception. His passer rating was 80.6.
Who led the Raiders in receiving?
Brock Bowers led the Raiders with five receptions for 103 yards. His longest reception was 38 yards.
Who led the Patriots in receiving?
Kayshon Boutte recorded six receptions for 103 yards and averaged 17.2 yards per reception.
Which team had more rushing yards?
The Patriots had slightly more rushing yards, finishing with 60 yards on 18 attempts compared with 56 yards on 24 attempts for the Raiders.
Conclusion
The las vegas raiders vs new england patriots match player stats show a game in which the final seven-point margin was shaped more by passing efficiency and explosive plays than by a simple advantage in total offensive volume.
Geno Smith’s 362 passing yards were the statistical centerpiece of the Raiders’ victory. Brock Bowers added 103 receiving yards, while Ashton Jeanty contributed the team’s rushing touchdown despite averaging only 2.0 yards per carry.
For New England, Drake Maye produced 287 passing yards and completed 30 passes. Kayshon Boutte also reached 103 receiving yards. The Patriots ran effectively enough to finish with 60 rushing yards at a 3.3-yard average, but they did not convert that production into a rushing touchdown.
Defensively, the teams were closely matched in sacks and quarterback hits. Both recorded four sacks and nine quarterback hits, while each defense intercepted the opposing quarterback once.
The biggest statistical separation came through the air. Las Vegas averaged 15.1 yards per reception compared with New England’s 9.6. That difference helped the Raiders produce 75 more passing yards despite completing six fewer passes.
The scoring pattern is equally important. New England held a 10-7 halftime lead, but Las Vegas scored 10 points in the third quarter while shutting the Patriots out. That shift gave the Raiders a lead they maintained through the final quarter.
Ultimately, the box score presents a clear picture of two different offensive profiles. New England generated more passing completions and slightly better rushing efficiency, while Las Vegas created more explosive passing production and turned that yardage into enough points to win 20-13.
