Memphis Grizzlies vs Golden State Warriors Match Player Stats
The memphis grizzlies vs golden state warriors match player stats from the 2026 NBA Summer League showcase a competitive battle between two talented young rosters. Golden State secured a hard fought 94 to 90 victory over Memphis at the Thomas & Mack Center in Las Vegas on July 19, 2026. While the final score tells part of the story, the individual performances, team efficiency, rebounding battle, and fourth quarter execution reveal why the Warriors finished on top. This complete breakdown examines every important statistic, highlights standout players, compares team performances, and explains what these numbers mean for both organizations moving forward.
Game Overview
The NBA Summer League provides teams with an opportunity to evaluate rookies, young prospects, second year players, and developmental talent under competitive conditions. Every possession matters because coaching staffs use these games to determine which players deserve larger roles heading into training camp.
This matchup between Memphis and Golden State was one of the most competitive contests of the Las Vegas Summer League.
Game Information
| Match Detail | Result |
| Competition | NBA Summer League |
| Date | July 19, 2026 |
| Venue | Thomas & Mack Center |
| Location | Las Vegas, Nevada |
| Broadcast | ESPN |
| Final Score | Golden State Warriors 94, Memphis Grizzlies 90 |
Memphis Grizzlies vs Golden State Warriors Match Player Stats
The biggest takeaway from the game was Golden State’s ability to finish stronger during the closing minutes. Memphis entered the fourth quarter with momentum after a dominant third period, but the Warriors outscored the Grizzlies 28 to 14 in the final quarter to complete an impressive comeback.
Quarter by quarter scoring illustrates how the momentum shifted throughout the evening.
| Quarter | Golden State | Memphis |
| First | 23 | 24 |
| Second | 24 | 23 |
| Third | 19 | 29 |
| Fourth | 28 | 14 |
| Final | 94 | 90 |
Although Memphis appeared in control entering the final period, Golden State tightened its defense, controlled the offensive glass, and converted key scoring opportunities when the game mattered most.
Golden State Warriors Player Statistics
Several Warriors made valuable contributions throughout the contest.
Yaxel Lendeborg
Yaxel Lendeborg delivered one of the most complete performances of the Summer League.
Statistics
- 21 points
- 10 rebounds
- Double double
His impact extended well beyond scoring. He consistently attacked the paint, secured second chance opportunities, and protected possessions with smart decision making.
Deivon Smith
Coming off the bench, Deivon Smith provided instant offense.
Statistics
- 21 points
His aggressive drives and confidence helped Golden State maintain offensive rhythm whenever the starters rested.
LJ Cryer
While Cryer was not the leading scorer, he directed the offense effectively.
Statistics
- Team high 6 assists
His playmaking created quality shots and helped the Warriors execute during their fourth quarter comeback.
Warriors Starting Lineup
- Yaxel Lendeborg
- Malevy Leons
- Will Richard
- Graham Ike
- LJ Cryer
Memphis Grizzlies Player Statistics
Despite the loss, Memphis produced several standout individual performances.
Cameron Boozer
Boozer continued to demonstrate why he is considered one of the team’s most exciting young talents.
Statistics
- 19 points
- 8 rebounds
He scored efficiently around the basket while also contributing on the defensive glass.
Cedric Coward
Coward matched Boozer’s scoring production.
Statistics
- 19 points
His offensive consistency kept Memphis competitive throughout all four quarters.
Javon Small
The point guard controlled the offense effectively.
Statistics
- 8 assists
His passing consistently created open looks for teammates.
Carson Cooper
Memphis received valuable scoring from its bench.
Statistics
- 16 points
His energy helped Memphis build momentum during the third quarter.
Memphis Starting Lineup
- Cameron Boozer
- Cedric Coward
- Taylor Hendricks
- Olivier Maxence Prosper
- Javon Small
Complete Team Statistics Comparison
The overall numbers show just how closely matched both teams were.
| Team Statistics | Golden State | Memphis |
| Field Goals | 37 of 75 (49%) | 34 of 76 (45%) |
| Three Point Shooting | 9 of 30 (30%) | 14 of 37 (38%) |
| Free Throws | 8 of 12 (67%) | 4 of 8 (50%) |
| Total Rebounds | 42 | 33 |
| Offensive Rebounds | 18 | 13 |
| Defensive Rebounds | 24 | 20 |
| Assists | 16 | 22 |
| Turnovers | 14 | 10 |
| Steals | 6 | 6 |
| Blocks | 3 | 1 |
| Personal Fouls | 18 | 17 |
Statistical Analysis
Golden State Controlled the Glass
One statistic had perhaps the greatest influence on the outcome.
Golden State collected 42 rebounds compared to Memphis’ 33.
The Warriors also grabbed 18 offensive rebounds, creating valuable second chance scoring opportunities that eventually proved decisive.
Memphis Shot Better From Three
The Grizzlies actually outperformed Golden State from beyond the arc.
- Memphis
- 14 made three pointers
- 38 percent shooting
- Golden State
- 9 made three pointers
- 30 percent shooting
This long range advantage nearly carried Memphis to victory.
Warriors Were More Efficient Inside
Golden State shot 49 percent from the field compared to Memphis’ 45 percent.
That efficiency inside the arc helped offset Memphis’ advantage from three point range.
Ball Movement Favored Memphis
The Grizzlies recorded 22 assists, six more than Golden State.
This suggests Memphis generated quality ball movement throughout much of the contest.
Fourth Quarter Difference
The final period completely changed the outcome.
Memphis scored only 14 points during the fourth quarter, while Golden State exploded for 28.
Late game execution separated the two teams more than any other factor.
Top Individual Performers
Golden State Warriors
| Player | Points | Rebounds | Assists |
| Yaxel Lendeborg | 21 | 10 | Key all around impact |
| Deivon Smith | 21 | Valuable bench scoring | Offensive spark |
| LJ Cryer | Leadership | Playmaking | 6 assists |
Memphis Grizzlies
| Player | Points | Rebounds | Assists |
| Cameron Boozer | 19 | 8 | Strong two way play |
| Cedric Coward | 19 | Important scorer | Consistent offense |
| Javon Small | Floor general | Offensive creator | 8 assists |
| Carson Cooper | 16 | Bench production | Valuable reserve |
Why Golden State Won
After reviewing every statistic, several reasons explain the Warriors’ victory.
Dominant Rebounding
Winning the rebound battle by nine possessions gave Golden State additional scoring opportunities.
Better Overall Shooting
Despite making fewer three pointers, Golden State converted a higher percentage of total field goals.
Bench Production
Deivon Smith’s 21 points gave the Warriors a significant offensive boost.
Fourth Quarter Defense
Holding Memphis to only 14 points in the final period completely shifted the momentum.
Areas Memphis Can Improve
Although the Grizzlies lost by only four points, the statistics identify several improvement areas.
Finish Defensive Possessions
Allowing 18 offensive rebounds is difficult to overcome.
Close Games More Effectively
Protecting a late lead requires limiting second chance opportunities and maintaining offensive rhythm.
Improve Free Throw Accuracy
Memphis attempted only eight free throws and converted just half of them.
What This Means Going Forward
Summer League results should never be viewed as direct predictors of regular season success. Instead, they provide valuable information about player development, basketball IQ, defensive effort, and adaptability.
Golden State demonstrated depth, rebounding strength, and resilience during pressure situations.
Memphis showed excellent perimeter shooting, quality passing, and balanced scoring but will likely focus on improving rebounding and late game execution as player development continues.
From watching Summer League over the years, one pattern consistently stands out. Teams that rebound well and remain composed during close fourth quarters often maximize the developmental value of these games. This matchup followed that trend almost perfectly, with Golden State’s persistence on the glass proving just as important as its shot making.
For readers interested in official NBA statistics and historical records, the NBA Stats database is a trusted resource for verified game data.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who won the Memphis Grizzlies vs Golden State Warriors Summer League game?
Golden State Warriors defeated the Memphis Grizzlies by a final score of 94 to 90.
Who scored the most points in the game?
Yaxel Lendeborg and Deivon Smith each scored 21 points for Golden State. Cameron Boozer and Cedric Coward led Memphis with 19 points each.
Which player recorded a double double?
Yaxel Lendeborg finished with 21 points and 10 rebounds, recording a double double.
Which team shot better from three point range?
Memphis shot 38 percent from three point range, while Golden State shot 30 percent.
What was the biggest statistical difference in the game?
Golden State’s advantage on the boards was significant. The Warriors collected 42 rebounds compared to Memphis’ 33, including 18 offensive rebounds.
Why did Golden State win despite Memphis making more three pointers?
The Warriors were more efficient overall from the field, dominated rebounding, earned more second chance opportunities, and outscored Memphis 28 to 14 during the fourth quarter.
Conclusion
The memphis grizzlies vs golden state warriors match player stats highlight a game that was decided by execution rather than talent alone. Memphis displayed excellent ball movement and perimeter shooting, while Golden State relied on efficient scoring, relentless rebounding, and outstanding fourth quarter defense to earn a 94 to 90 victory.
Yaxel Lendeborg emerged as the game’s most impactful player with a 21 point, 10 rebound double double, while Deivon Smith supplied critical scoring from the bench. For Memphis, Cameron Boozer, Cedric Coward, Javon Small, and Carson Cooper each demonstrated why the Grizzlies have an exciting group of young prospects.
Beyond the final score, this Summer League contest offered valuable insight into player development, roster depth, and the importance of winning the possession battle. Those lessons often prove just as meaningful as the result itself.
