Arizona Cardinals vs 49ers Match Player Stats

The arizona cardinals vs 49ers match player stats from the September 21, 2025 NFL regular-season meeting tell the story of one of the closest games of the season. The San Francisco 49ers defeated the Arizona Cardinals 16-15 at home, but the final score does not fully explain how competitive the game was. San Francisco produced 355 total yards compared with Arizona’s 260, while Arizona controlled possession for 34:39 and produced 106 rushing yards. The 49ers ultimately won because they converted their late offensive opportunity into a game-winning field goal, while Arizona’s defense and special teams kept the contest within one possession for most of the afternoon.

This matchup is particularly valuable for readers who want to understand player performance beyond a basic box score. Mac Jones passed for 284 yards and led San Francisco’s final drive, while Ricky Pearsall produced 117 receiving yards and Christian McCaffrey contributed 52 rushing yards plus 88 receiving yards. For Arizona, Kyler Murray completed 22 of 35 passes for 159 yards and a touchdown, while Trey McBride scored Arizona’s only offensive touchdown and Mack Wilson Sr. led the Cardinals with 12 tackles.

The game also produced an unusual statistical contrast. Arizona gained more yards on the ground, held the ball for more than nine minutes longer, and did not lose a turnover, yet San Francisco still won. That makes this matchup an excellent example of why NFL analysis should consider efficiency, field position, situational execution, and late-game performance rather than simply looking at total yardage.

Arizona Cardinals vs 49ers Match Player Stats: Game Overview

The game took place on September 21, 2025, at San Francisco’s home venue. The 49ers entered the contest with a 2-0 record and improved to 3-0 after the victory, while Arizona fell to 2-1.

The Cardinals scored in the second, third, and fourth quarters, but San Francisco’s 10-point fourth quarter was enough to secure the win.

Category	Arizona Cardinals	San Francisco 49ers
Final Score	15	16
First Quarter	0	0
Second Quarter	3	6
Third Quarter	3	0
Fourth Quarter	9	10
Total Yards	260	355
Passing Yards	154	282
Rushing Yards	106	73
First Downs	16	19
Third Down	5/15	2/10
Fourth Down	2/2	1/2
Total Plays	64	62
Yards Per Play	4.1	5.7
Turnovers	0	1
Time of Possession	34:39	25:21
Red Zone	1/3	1/4

The numbers immediately show that this was not a straightforward victory for San Francisco.

Arizona had several statistical advantages. The Cardinals ran two more plays, held the ball for 34:39, rushed for 33 more yards, and did not turn the ball over. They also converted both of their fourth-down attempts.

San Francisco, however, generated considerably more total offense. Its 355 yards were 95 more than Arizona’s 260, and the 49ers averaged 5.7 yards per play compared with Arizona’s 4.1.

That difference in offensive efficiency was one of the most important factors in the final result.

Quarter-by-Quarter Breakdown

The scoring pattern explains why the game remained so tense.

First Quarter: A Scoreless Start

Neither team scored in the opening quarter.

The lack of early points did not mean the offenses were completely ineffective. Instead, both defenses prevented sustained scoring opportunities, setting up a game in which every possession became increasingly important.

A scoreless first quarter also placed greater importance on field position and third-down execution. Neither side could establish an early cushion, meaning the game remained within one possession throughout the contest.

Second Quarter: San Francisco Takes a Small Lead

Arizona opened the scoring with Chad Ryland’s 34-yard field goal.

San Francisco responded with two Eddy Pineiro field goals, including a 51-yard kick. That gave the 49ers a 6-3 halftime advantage.

Pineiro’s ability to convert from distance became increasingly important as the game progressed. His reliable kicking gave San Francisco valuable points in a contest where touchdowns were difficult to produce.

Third Quarter: Arizona Pulls Level

Ryland added another field goal for Arizona, making the score 6-6.

Neither offense found the end zone during the quarter. Arizona’s defense continued to keep the 49ers from building a significant lead, while the Cardinals’ offense remained within striking distance.

The third quarter therefore became a defensive battle. Neither team could create enough separation to take control, setting up a dramatic final period.

Fourth Quarter: Everything Changed

The final quarter produced the game’s decisive moments.

San Francisco scored first when Kyle Juszczyk caught a one-yard touchdown pass from Mac Jones. The 49ers moved ahead 13-6.

Arizona answered with a one-yard touchdown pass from Kyler Murray to Trey McBride, tying the game at 13-13 after the extra point.

Then came one of the most unusual and important plays of the game. A defensive holding penalty in the end zone resulted in a safety, giving Arizona a 15-13 lead.

That lead appeared to put the Cardinals in position to win.

However, San Francisco received the ball with 1:46 remaining. Jones directed a late drive that moved the 49ers into field-goal range, and Pineiro converted a 35-yard kick as time expired.

The 49ers won 16-15.

Mac Jones vs Kyler Murray

The quarterback comparison is central to understanding the arizona cardinals vs 49ers match player stats.

Mac Jones

Mac Jones finished with:

• 27 completions on 41 attempts
• 284 passing yards
• 1 touchdown
• 1 interception
• 1 sack
• 56.5 QBR
• 83.8 passer rating

The raw statistics show a quarterback who was not perfect but produced considerably more passing volume and yardage than Murray.

More importantly, Jones made the most important sequence of the game happen when San Francisco needed it most. He completed five passes for 59 yards on the final possession, helping set up Pineiro’s winning 35-yard field goal.

That final drive should be considered separately from the full-game stat line.

A quarterback can finish with an interception and still deliver the most valuable sequence of the afternoon. In this case, Jones’s late-game execution had a direct impact on the final result.

Kyler Murray

Murray finished with:

• 22 completions on 35 attempts
• 159 passing yards
• 1 touchdown
• 0 interceptions
• 1 sack
• 53.0 QBR
• 82.9 passer rating

Murray was more secure with the football than Jones. He did not throw an interception and helped Arizona remain competitive throughout the game.

However, Arizona’s passing attack was less productive overall. The Cardinals finished with 154 passing yards compared with 282 for San Francisco in the team statistics.

The key lesson is that quarterback efficiency cannot always be measured by interceptions alone. Jones gave the 49ers more passing production and delivered the decisive late drive, while Murray protected the football but did not generate the same volume through the air.

Trey Benson Leads Arizona’s Ground Game

Trey Benson was Arizona’s leading rusher.

His statistical line included:

• 10 carries
• 42 yards
• 4.2 yards per carry
• 29-yard long
• 0 touchdowns

His 29-yard run was the longest rushing play for either team.

Arizona’s entire rushing attack produced 106 yards on 28 attempts, an average of 3.8 yards per carry. Kyler Murray added 37 rushing yards on six carries, while James Conner gained 22 yards on nine attempts.

The Cardinals’ rushing numbers were one of the more interesting elements of the matchup.

Arizona ran the ball effectively enough to maintain balance, but the team did not turn that rushing advantage into a decisive scoring advantage. The Cardinals had seven rushing first downs, compared with four for San Francisco, yet they still lost the game.

This is a useful reminder that rushing totals are only one part of offensive success. The quality of drives, red-zone execution, and late-game possessions can matter more than total rushing volume.

Christian McCaffrey’s All-Around Impact

Christian McCaffrey had a productive game even though his rushing average was modest.

His rushing line:

• 17 carries
• 52 yards
• 3.1 yards per carry
• 15-yard long
• 0 touchdowns

His receiving contribution was arguably more important.

McCaffrey caught:

• 10 passes
• 88 yards
• 8.8 yards per reception
• 15 targets
• 20-yard long

Combining his rushing and receiving totals gives him 140 yards from scrimmage.

That figure illustrates his value to San Francisco’s offense. Even when the Cardinals limited his rushing efficiency, he remained heavily involved as a receiver.

This is one of the clearest examples of why looking only at rushing statistics can create an incomplete picture of a running back’s performance. McCaffrey’s impact extended into the passing game, where he became a major outlet for Jones.

San Francisco’s offense ultimately gained 355 total yards, and McCaffrey’s ability to contribute in multiple phases was an important part of that production.

Ricky Pearsall Breaks Out as San Francisco’s Leading Receiver

Ricky Pearsall produced the most receiving yards of any player in the game.

His final line:

• 8 receptions
• 117 yards
• 14.6 yards per reception
• 11 targets
• 34-yard long
• 0 touchdowns

Pearsall’s performance was significant because it gave San Francisco a downfield receiving threat while the offense operated without its usual starting quarterback.

His 117 receiving yards represented a substantial portion of San Francisco’s passing production.

The matchup also showed a notable difference between Arizona and San Francisco’s passing distribution. The 49ers produced both greater passing volume and greater yardage.

That combination helped San Francisco generate 355 total yards despite throwing an interception.

Marvin Harrison Jr. and Trey McBride Lead Arizona’s Receiving Group

Marvin Harrison Jr. led Arizona in receiving yards.

His numbers were:

• 3 receptions
• 44 yards
• 14.7 yards per reception
• 6 targets
• 32-yard long
• 0 touchdowns

Although Harrison Jr. did not score, his 32-yard reception was Arizona’s longest catch of the game.

Trey McBride led the Cardinals in receptions:

• 5 receptions
• 43 yards
• 8.6 yards per reception
• 8 targets
• 17-yard long
• 1 touchdown

McBride’s biggest moment came in the fourth quarter when he caught Murray’s one-yard touchdown pass. That score tied the game at 13-13 and briefly gave Arizona renewed momentum.

The contrast between the two players is interesting. Harrison Jr. provided the larger average gain, while McBride was more involved as a short and intermediate target and ultimately scored Arizona’s only offensive touchdown.

Defensive Player Stats and Key Performers

The arizona cardinals vs 49ers match player stats also reveal how important defensive contributions were in a game decided by one point.

Mack Wilson Sr. Leads Arizona

Mack Wilson Sr. finished with 12 total tackles, including six solo tackles.

That made him Arizona’s leading tackler.

Dadrion Taylor-Demerson also produced a major defensive play by intercepting Mac Jones. He returned the interception 18 yards.

The Cardinals finished with one interception and one sack. Their ability to pressure San Francisco and force a turnover helped prevent the 49ers from pulling away despite their advantage in total offense.

Fred Warner Leads San Francisco

Fred Warner recorded 11 total tackles and two passes defended.

His performance was a major part of San Francisco’s defensive effort, particularly in a game where Arizona controlled possession for more than 34 minutes.

The San Francisco defense also recorded one sack and prevented Arizona from converting its final possession into a response after the 49ers regained the lead.

The defensive performance was therefore less about overwhelming Arizona statistically and more about making timely stops.

The Most Important Statistical Battle: Efficiency

The final score might suggest an evenly matched offensive game, but the efficiency numbers tell a more nuanced story.

San Francisco averaged 5.7 yards per play.

Arizona averaged 4.1.

That difference of 1.6 yards per play is substantial over the course of an NFL game.

The 49ers also generated 19 first downs compared with 16 for Arizona. Their passing attack produced 14 passing first downs, while Arizona recorded eight.

Arizona, however, had the advantage on the ground and in possession time.

This created an unusual balance:

• Arizona controlled the clock.
• San Francisco produced more total yardage.
• Arizona protected the football.
• San Francisco created more explosive offensive production.
• Arizona converted both fourth-down attempts.
• San Francisco won the final possession battle when it mattered most.

The result demonstrates that possession time and turnover avoidance do not automatically guarantee victory.

Third-Down and Fourth-Down Performance

Third-down efficiency was one area where both teams struggled.

Arizona converted 5 of 15 third downs.

San Francisco converted only 2 of 10.

That is a significant weakness for the 49ers and helps explain why Arizona was able to maintain possession and keep the game close.

However, Arizona was perfect on fourth down, converting both attempts.

San Francisco converted one of two fourth-down opportunities.

This means Arizona was more successful at extending drives in critical situations, yet the Cardinals could not turn that advantage into enough points to secure the win.

The final score was therefore shaped by a combination of efficiency and timing. San Francisco did not dominate every down. Instead, the 49ers produced enough big plays and executed the decisive late drive.

Red-Zone Execution

Red-zone performance was another critical area.

Arizona finished 1-for-3 in the red zone.

San Francisco finished 1-for-4.

Neither team was particularly efficient near the goal line.

This is important because the game ended with only 31 total points, despite San Francisco gaining 355 yards.

Both defenses made it difficult to convert promising drives into touchdowns.

As a result, field goals became extremely valuable.

Eddy Pineiro made all three of his field-goal attempts, including kicks from 38, 51, and 35 yards.

Chad Ryland made two of three field goals.

Pineiro’s perfect performance produced 10 points, while Ryland’s two field goals and extra point accounted for seven Arizona points.

The kicking difference was therefore 10 points to seven, a three-point advantage for San Francisco. The final margin was only one point.

That makes Pineiro’s perfect night one of the most important individual statistical factors in the matchup.

Eddy Pineiro’s Perfect Night

Eddy Pineiro was one of the decisive players in the game.

His kicking statistics:

• 3 field goals made on 3 attempts
• 100% field-goal percentage
• Long of 51 yards
• 1 extra point
• 10 total points

His final kick was the most important.

With the game tied at 15-15, Pineiro converted a 35-yard field goal as time expired.

The significance of his performance goes beyond the basic three field goals. San Francisco needed every one of those kicks because the offense struggled to finish several drives with touchdowns.

In a one-point game, perfect kicking can be the difference between victory and defeat.

Special Teams Made a Difference

Special teams often receive less attention than quarterbacks and skill-position players, but this matchup showed why they matter.

Arizona’s Greg Dortch returned two kickoffs for 58 yards and one punt for eight yards.

San Francisco’s Skyy Moore returned two kickoffs for 61 yards and three punts for 26 yards.

The 49ers also received 10 points from Pineiro’s kicking.

Arizona’s Blake Gillikin punted five times for 258 yards, averaging 51.6 yards per punt.

San Francisco’s Thomas Morstead punted three times for 128 yards, averaging 42.7 yards.

Arizona therefore punted more frequently, while San Francisco had fewer punts and more offensive yardage.

The special-teams battle was not the sole reason San Francisco won, but field position and reliable kicking contributed to a game decided by the smallest possible margin short of overtime.

Turnovers: Arizona Won the Battle but Lost the Game

One of the most striking facts in the arizona cardinals vs 49ers match player stats is the turnover discrepancy.

Arizona recorded:

• 0 turnovers lost
• 1 interception made

San Francisco recorded:

• 1 interception thrown
• 0 turnovers lost
• 0 interceptions made

Arizona won the turnover margin.

Normally, that is a strong indicator of winning probability.

But the Cardinals still lost.

This is a valuable lesson for evaluating individual performances. A team can win the turnover battle and still lose because of deficiencies in offensive efficiency, red-zone production, explosive plays, or late-game execution.

San Francisco’s ability to overcome its interception and still win is one of the clearest examples of how multiple statistical categories interact in an NFL game.

What the Box Score Does Not Tell You

A traditional box score provides the raw numbers, but several deeper observations emerge when the statistics are viewed together.

1. San Francisco Was More Explosive

The 49ers gained 355 total yards at 5.7 yards per play.

Arizona gained 260 at 4.1.

That difference indicates that San Francisco created more value per offensive snap.

2. Arizona Was Better at Controlling the Game’s Pace

Arizona held possession for 34:39.

San Francisco held it for 25:21.

The Cardinals therefore had more opportunities to control tempo and keep the 49ers’ offense on the sideline.

3. San Francisco Won the Passing Battle Clearly

The 49ers generated 282 passing yards in the official team statistics, compared with 154 for Arizona.

Ricky Pearsall’s 117 receiving yards and McCaffrey’s 88 receiving yards were major contributors to that advantage.

4. Arizona’s Defense Created Opportunities

The Cardinals intercepted Jones and held San Francisco to only two third-down conversions in 10 attempts.

That defensive performance gave Arizona a genuine chance to win.

5. The Final Drive Decided Everything

The game was not won by a single dominant statistical category.

It was won by execution at the end.

Jones moved San Francisco 59 yards through the air on the final possession, and Pineiro finished the job with the winning field goal.

A Closer Look at the Team Statistics

For readers who want a compact analytical view, the biggest statistical differences were these.

San Francisco’s Advantages

• 355 total yards versus 260
• 282 passing yards versus 154
• 19 first downs versus 16
• 5.7 yards per play versus 4.1
• 14 passing first downs versus eight
• Perfect 3-for-3 field-goal kicking
• 117 receiving yards from Ricky Pearsall
• 88 receiving yards from Christian McCaffrey

Arizona’s Advantages

• 106 rushing yards versus 73
• 34:39 possession versus 25:21
• 5-for-15 third-down conversion versus 2-for-10
• 2-for-2 fourth-down conversion versus 1-for-2
• 0 turnovers lost versus one by San Francisco
• One defensive interception
• 12 tackles from Mack Wilson Sr.

The important point is that both teams had clear strengths.

San Francisco’s strengths were passing efficiency, total offensive production, and late-game execution.

Arizona’s strengths were possession, rushing production, turnover security, and fourth-down conversion.

The 49ers simply converted their final opportunity into three points, while Arizona could not answer.

What This Game Says About Kyler Murray’s Performance

Murray’s numbers deserve context.

His 159 passing yards were not enough to make Arizona’s passing game highly productive, but he did avoid an interception and threw the touchdown that tied the game in the fourth quarter.

He also added 37 rushing yards.

That means Murray accounted for 196 combined passing and rushing yards before considering any other offensive contribution.

His performance was therefore more valuable than his 159 passing yards alone might suggest.

At the same time, Arizona needed more consistent passing production to overcome San Francisco’s advantage in total yardage.

Murray’s performance was solid in terms of ball security, but San Francisco’s defense prevented him from generating the volume needed to create separation on the scoreboard.

What This Game Says About Mac Jones

Jones’s game is best understood through two separate lenses.

The first is the full-game box score.

He completed 27 of 41 passes for 284 yards, one touchdown, and one interception.

The second is the final drive.

Jones completed five passes for 59 yards in the closing possession, moving San Francisco into the range needed for Pineiro’s winning field goal.

That final sequence was a clear example of situational quarterback play.

A quarterback’s performance should not be judged exclusively by total passing yards or passer rating. In close games, the ability to execute under pressure in the final minutes can carry disproportionate value.

Jones did exactly that.

Why Ricky Pearsall Was a Key Offensive Standout

Pearsall’s 117 receiving yards were the highest total by any receiver in the matchup.

He also received 11 targets, making him a central part of the passing attack.

His 14.6 yards per reception average indicates that his production was not based solely on short, low-risk completions.

For San Francisco, Pearsall provided an important downfield component while McCaffrey operated as a major underneath and intermediate receiving option.

That combination helped the 49ers produce 282 passing yards despite throwing one interception.

Why Trey McBride’s Touchdown Mattered

McBride’s one-yard touchdown reception was Arizona’s only offensive touchdown.

It came at a critical point in the fourth quarter and tied the game.

His five catches for 43 yards were not the largest receiving numbers on the Cardinals, but his touchdown gave Arizona a chance to take control of the game.

This is an important distinction in player analysis.

A receiver can lead a team in yardage without producing the most consequential play. McBride’s touchdown was arguably more important to Arizona’s immediate game position than any individual Harrison Jr. reception.

The Role of Defensive Discipline

The game also highlighted how a single penalty can influence a close contest.

Arizona took a 15-13 lead through a safety caused by defensive holding in the end zone.

The play gave the Cardinals two points and possession of the lead.

However, the Cardinals’ defense then needed to stop San Francisco from driving into field-goal range.

It could not.

The 49ers’ final possession turned a two-point deficit into a one-point victory.

This is why late-game defensive execution is so important in NFL analysis. A defense can create a major scoring play and still need to finish the game on the next series.

The Biggest Takeaways From the Match

The most useful conclusions from the player and team statistics are straightforward.

San Francisco Won Through Passing Efficiency

The 49ers gained 282 passing yards compared with Arizona’s 154.

That was the biggest statistical advantage in the game.

Arizona’s Rushing Attack Was Better

The Cardinals rushed for 106 yards, while San Francisco produced 73.

Trey Benson led Arizona with 42 yards, and Murray added 37.

McCaffrey Was a Dual-Threat Weapon

His 52 rushing yards combined with 88 receiving yards for 140 yards from scrimmage.

Pearsall Was the Top Receiver

His 117 receiving yards were the best receiving total in the matchup.

Arizona’s Defense Was Competitive

The Cardinals recorded one interception and one sack while holding San Francisco to two third-down conversions.

San Francisco’s Kicker Was Perfect

Pineiro made all three field-goal attempts and scored 10 points.

The Final Drive Was the Difference

Jones and Pineiro combined to turn a 15-13 deficit into a 16-15 victory.

Why the Final Score Was So Close Despite the Yardage Gap

A 95-yard difference in total offense might normally produce a more comfortable victory.

Instead, San Francisco won by one point.

Several factors explain this.

First, Arizona controlled possession.

Second, the Cardinals won the turnover margin.

Third, Arizona converted both fourth-down attempts.

Fourth, San Francisco struggled on third down.

Fifth, both teams had limited red-zone success.

These factors allowed Arizona to remain competitive despite producing fewer total yards.

The 49ers’ advantage came from making more of their opportunities count. Their passing game produced more yardage, and their kicker converted every field-goal attempt.

In other words, this was an efficiency and execution victory rather than a dominant statistical victory.

How to Use These Player Stats for Fantasy Football Analysis

Although the game itself is already complete, the player statistics can still offer useful fantasy football lessons.

Christian McCaffrey

McCaffrey’s receiving role was significant. His 15 targets and 88 receiving yards demonstrated that his fantasy value can remain strong even when his rushing efficiency is limited.

Ricky Pearsall

Pearsall’s 117 receiving yards on eight catches made him the leading receiver in the game.

His 11 targets were particularly notable because target volume often provides a more useful indicator of future receiving opportunity than a single game’s yardage total.

Trey McBride

McBride combined five receptions with a touchdown, making him one of Arizona’s most important offensive contributors.

Marvin Harrison Jr.

Harrison Jr. averaged 14.7 yards per catch and produced Arizona’s longest reception at 32 yards.

His three receptions were fewer than McBride’s five, but his efficiency per catch remained strong.

Kyler Murray

Murray’s rushing contribution matters in fantasy analysis. His 37 rushing yards added value beyond his 159 passing yards.

These statistics demonstrate why fantasy analysis should consider receiving targets, rushing involvement, red-zone opportunities, and quarterback rushing production rather than relying only on passing yards.

How to Interpret the Matchup for Future Analysis

The arizona cardinals vs 49ers match player stats should not be treated as a simple list of numbers.

The deeper story is that San Francisco won despite losing the turnover battle and struggling on third down.

Arizona lost despite:

• Holding the ball longer
• Rushing for more yards
• Converting both fourth downs
• Throwing no interceptions
• Intercepting the opposing quarterback

San Francisco overcame those disadvantages because its passing attack generated more yardage and its offense executed when the game was on the line.

For analysts, this is a useful example of why NFL performance should be evaluated through multiple layers.

Start with the box score.

Then examine efficiency.

Next, review situational football.

Finally, study the final possessions.

That process gives a much clearer picture than simply stating that the 49ers won 16-15.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who won the Cardinals vs 49ers game on September 21, 2025?

The San Francisco 49ers defeated the Arizona Cardinals 16-15 at home. Eddy Pineiro kicked the game-winning 35-yard field goal as time expired.

Who was the leading passer in the game?

Mac Jones was the leading passer with 27 completions on 41 attempts for 284 passing yards, one touchdown, and one interception.

Who led the Cardinals in rushing?

Trey Benson led Arizona with 10 carries for 42 yards, including a 29-yard run.

Who was the leading receiver?

Ricky Pearsall led all players with 117 receiving yards on eight receptions. He was targeted 11 times.

How did Kyler Murray perform?

Murray completed 22 of 35 passes for 159 yards, one touchdown, and no interceptions. He also rushed for 37 yards on six attempts.

Which team had more total yards?

San Francisco had more total yards, producing 355 compared with Arizona’s 260. The 49ers also averaged 5.7 yards per play, compared with 4.1 for the Cardinals.

Conclusion

The arizona cardinals vs 49ers match player stats from September 21, 2025, provide a detailed example of how an NFL game can be decided by execution rather than one dominant statistical category.

San Francisco finished with a substantial advantage in total offense and passing production. Mac Jones delivered the decisive late drive, Ricky Pearsall led all receivers with 117 yards, Christian McCaffrey contributed 140 yards from scrimmage, and Eddy Pineiro converted all three of his field-goal attempts.

Arizona had its own statistical strengths. The Cardinals rushed for 106 yards, controlled possession for 34:39, converted both fourth-down attempts, and won the turnover margin. Kyler Murray protected the football, Trey Benson led the rushing attack, Trey McBride scored the team’s only offensive touchdown, and Mack Wilson Sr. led the defense with 12 tackles.

Yet the final sequence defined the game. Arizona moved ahead 15-13 after a fourth-quarter safety, but San Francisco responded with a final possession that produced 59 passing yards and a game-winning field goal.

The arizona cardinals vs 49ers match player stats therefore show a matchup where the 49ers were more productive offensively, the Cardinals were effective in controlling possession and avoiding turnovers, and late-game execution ultimately separated the two teams by a single point.