Philadelphia Eagles vs 49ers Match Player Stats
Philadelphia Eagles vs 49ers match player stats from the January 11, 2026 NFC Wild Card playoff tell a much more detailed story than the final score alone. The San Francisco 49ers defeated the Philadelphia Eagles 23-19 at Lincoln Financial Field, overcoming a fourth-quarter deficit behind Brock Purdy, Christian McCaffrey, Jauan Jennings, and a decisive late offensive drive. Philadelphia controlled the ball for longer and produced more rushing yards, but San Francisco created more explosive passing plays and converted its opportunities more efficiently.
The game was particularly interesting because the statistical picture was not a simple case of the winning team dominating every category. Philadelphia finished with 307 total yards compared with San Francisco’s 361, held a significant time-of-possession advantage, and gained 140 rushing yards. The 49ers, however, averaged 6.2 yards per offensive play compared with Philadelphia’s 4.3 and generated 286 net passing yards. Those differences helped explain how San Francisco won despite having the ball for only 24:21.
This article breaks down the individual performances, team-level numbers, key plays, quarterback efficiency, rushing production, receiving output, turnovers, special teams, and the statistical reasons the 49ers advanced.
Philadelphia Eagles vs 49ers Match Player Stats: Game Overview
The matchup was played on January 11, 2026, at Lincoln Financial Field in Philadelphia as an NFC Wild Card playoff game.
San Francisco entered the game with a 12-5 regular-season record and a 7-2 road mark. Philadelphia entered at 11-6 and had gone 5-3 at home. The 49ers eventually won 23-19, scoring 13 points in the fourth quarter after trailing 16-10 entering the final period.
Final Score by Quarter
| Team | 1st | 2nd | 3rd | 4th | Final |
| San Francisco 49ers | 7 | 3 | 0 | 13 | 23 |
| Philadelphia Eagles | 6 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 19 |
The fourth quarter was the defining period.
Philadelphia took a 19-17 lead on Jake Elliott’s 33-yard field goal with eight minutes remaining. San Francisco responded with a 10-play, 66-yard touchdown drive that ended with Purdy finding McCaffrey for a four-yard touchdown with 2:54 left. Philadelphia then had one final possession but could not convert a fourth-and-11 from the San Francisco 21-yard line.
That sequence is important when evaluating the player statistics because the winning performance was not built solely on early-game production. San Francisco’s most important offensive numbers came when the game was at its most consequential stage.
Brock Purdy’s Passing Performance
Brock Purdy finished with 18 completions on 31 attempts for 262 passing yards, two touchdowns, and two interceptions. He was also sacked once for five yards and finished with an 80.3 passer rating.
At first glance, the two interceptions might make the performance look shaky. That would be an incomplete assessment.
Purdy’s most valuable contribution came from his ability to recover after mistakes.
His two interceptions put additional pressure on San Francisco because Philadelphia did not turn the ball over itself. Yet Purdy continued to attack the field, and his 8.5 yards per passing attempt was considerably stronger than Jalen Hurts’ 4.8 yards per attempt.
Purdy also connected with Demarcus Robinson on a 61-yard pass during the opening drive. That explosive completion immediately demonstrated the difference between the two passing attacks. San Francisco could create substantial chunks of yardage without needing to string together long sequences of short completions.
Purdy’s Most Important Drive
The final San Francisco touchdown drive was arguably his most important stretch of the game.
After Philadelphia took a 19-17 lead, Purdy completed several critical passes, including a 16-yard completion to Robinson and an 11-yard completion to McCaffrey. The drive covered 66 yards over 10 plays and ended with the game-winning touchdown.
NFL.com’s game report noted that Purdy went 5-for-7 for 42 yards on that final touchdown drive and connected with McCaffrey for the decisive score.
That context matters more than simply counting his interceptions. A quarterback can have an imperfect statistical line and still produce the most valuable sequence of the game.
Jalen Hurts’ Performance
Jalen Hurts completed 20 of 35 passes for 168 yards and one touchdown with no interceptions. He was sacked once for one yard and finished with a 79.2 passer rating. He also carried the ball five times for 14 yards.
Hurts’ statistical line was efficient in terms of ball security, but Philadelphia struggled to generate explosive passing production.
His 168 passing yards were 94 fewer than Purdy’s 262 individual passing yards. More importantly, Hurts averaged only 4.8 yards per attempt. San Francisco’s offense averaged 8.7 yards per pass play when accounting for sacks, while Philadelphia averaged 4.6.
This was a major difference in the game.
Philadelphia did not need Hurts to throw for 300 yards to win. The Eagles were able to move the ball through Barkley and sustain long drives. However, once San Francisco found ways to limit the efficiency of those drives, Philadelphia had fewer explosive options available through the air.
Hurts’ Fourth-Quarter Challenge
Philadelphia’s final possession showed the problem.
After the Eagles reached the San Francisco 21-yard line, Hurts was unable to complete a pass on three straight attempts after taking a sack. The final incomplete pass came on fourth down with 43 seconds remaining, ending Philadelphia’s comeback opportunity.
The final numbers therefore need to be viewed alongside the game situation. Hurts protected the football, but Philadelphia could not turn that ball security into enough passing production to close the game.
Christian McCaffrey Was the Decisive Offensive Weapon
Christian McCaffrey’s role was central to San Francisco’s victory.
He rushed 15 times for 48 yards and added six receptions for 66 yards and two receiving touchdowns. His 114 combined rushing and receiving yards made him one of the most productive all-around players in the game.
His rushing average was only 3.2 yards per carry, which is not an outstanding figure by itself. But his receiving production changed the game.
McCaffrey’s two touchdown receptions came in the fourth quarter.
The first was a 29-yard touchdown reception from Jauan Jennings early in the fourth period. The second was a four-yard touchdown catch from Purdy with 2:54 remaining. Those two plays accounted for 12 of San Francisco’s 13 fourth-quarter points.
Why McCaffrey’s Receiving Numbers Matter
The six receptions for 66 yards should not be treated as secondary production.
McCaffrey averaged 11.0 yards per reception, giving San Francisco another way to attack Philadelphia beyond traditional wide receiver routes. His eight targets were also the second-highest total on the 49ers.
This created a difficult defensive problem. If Philadelphia focused too heavily on the perimeter, McCaffrey could become a receiving outlet. If the defense concentrated on the running game, San Francisco could use him in space.
That versatility became particularly valuable late in the game.
Saquon Barkley Led Philadelphia’s Ground Game
Saquon Barkley was Philadelphia’s leading rusher with 26 carries for 106 yards, an average of 4.1 yards per carry, with a long run of 29 yards.
Barkley was one of the clearest statistical bright spots for the Eagles.
He accounted for 106 of Philadelphia’s 140 rushing yards, meaning he produced roughly 76 percent of the team’s rushing yardage. His workload also showed that Philadelphia was willing to rely on its ground game in a playoff setting.
The Eagles ran the ball 36 times compared with 25 rushing attempts for San Francisco. That 11-carry difference helped Philadelphia control possession.
Yet the important point is that rushing volume did not automatically translate into victory.
Philadelphia had 140 rushing yards, but the 49ers produced 286 net passing yards. San Francisco’s offense therefore generated more yardage through the air than Philadelphia generated through its entire passing game.
Barkley’s Receiving Contribution
Barkley also caught three passes for 25 yards on six targets.
That gave him 131 total yards from scrimmage.
His impact was therefore not limited to the running game. However, his receiving output was modest compared with McCaffrey’s 66 receiving yards and two touchdown catches.
This is one of the most useful comparisons when studying the game.
Barkley was Philadelphia’s most productive overall offensive player by volume and rushing production. McCaffrey was more influential in the scoring phase because San Francisco repeatedly placed him in positions where his receiving ability could create touchdowns.
Demarcus Robinson Delivered the Biggest Receiving Performance
Demarcus Robinson was San Francisco’s leading receiver.
He caught six passes for 111 yards and one touchdown on seven targets. His average was 18.5 yards per reception, and his longest catch covered 61 yards.
That 61-yard reception came on San Francisco’s opening drive and immediately created a major field-position advantage.
Robinson’s performance was significant because Philadelphia’s offense did not produce a comparable explosive passing day.
The Eagles’ leading receiver, DeVonta Smith, caught eight passes for 70 yards. Smith had more receptions, but Robinson produced 41 more yards and scored a touchdown.
This is a good example of why reception totals alone can be misleading.
Eight catches for 70 yards can provide steady possession value, while six catches for 111 yards can generate more explosive impact. San Francisco’s offense benefited from the latter.
DeVonta Smith Was Philadelphia’s Most Productive Receiver
DeVonta Smith led the Eagles with eight receptions for 70 yards on 11 targets. He averaged 8.8 yards per reception and recorded a long catch of 15 yards.
Smith was clearly involved in the passing attack, receiving the highest number of targets among Philadelphia players.
His performance was productive in volume but lacked the explosive plays needed to consistently threaten San Francisco’s defense.
The contrast with Robinson is important:
| Player | Receptions | Yards | TD | Long |
| Demarcus Robinson | 6 | 111 | 1 | 61 |
| DeVonta Smith | 8 | 70 | 0 | 15 |
Smith’s eight receptions demonstrate reliable involvement. Robinson’s 111 yards demonstrate big-play efficiency.
Both are valuable, but in this particular game, San Francisco’s ability to produce explosive gains was more decisive.
Jauan Jennings Changed the Game With a Trick Play
One of the most memorable statistics from the matchup was Jauan Jennings’ passing line.
Jennings caught one pass for 45 yards and also completed his only pass attempt for 29 yards and a touchdown. That touchdown came on a 29-yard pass to McCaffrey.
This was not a conventional quarterback performance.
Jennings was used creatively, and the trick-play touchdown gave San Francisco 17-16 early in the fourth quarter.
That play mattered because it changed the momentum of a game Philadelphia had been controlling on the scoreboard.
The touchdown also demonstrated an important characteristic of playoff football: situational creativity can have an outsized effect even when the player involved has limited conventional statistics.
Jennings finished with only one reception, but his contribution included a 29-yard touchdown pass. From a pure box-score perspective, that looks unusual. From a game-impact perspective, it was enormous.
Dallas Goedert Scored Both Philadelphia Touchdowns
Dallas Goedert played a major role in Philadelphia’s scoring.
He rushed once for one yard and a touchdown, then caught four passes for 33 yards and another touchdown.
Both Eagles touchdowns came from Goedert.
His first touchdown was a one-yard rushing score in the first quarter. The extra point was missed, leaving Philadelphia six points instead of seven.
Goedert then caught a nine-yard touchdown pass from Hurts in the second quarter.
That gave Philadelphia a 13-7 lead and represented one of the Eagles’ strongest offensive stretches.
The unusual aspect is that Philadelphia’s two touchdowns were both produced by the same tight end, while Barkley carried most of the rushing workload and Smith led the receiving volume.
The Receiving Comparison Tells the Story
The leading pass catchers from each team produced very different profiles.
San Francisco
Demarcus Robinson
- 6 receptions
- 111 yards
- 1 touchdown
- 61-yard long
Christian McCaffrey
- 6 receptions
- 66 yards
- 2 touchdowns
Kyle Juszczyk
- 4 receptions
- 49 yards
Jauan Jennings
- 1 reception
- 45 yards
Philadelphia
DeVonta Smith
- 8 receptions
- 70 yards
Dallas Goedert
- 4 receptions
- 33 yards
- 1 touchdown
A.J. Brown
- 3 receptions
- 25 yards
Saquon Barkley
- 3 receptions
- 25 yards
The contrast is clear.
Philadelphia’s receiving production was concentrated around short and intermediate gains. San Francisco produced more explosive plays, including Robinson’s 61-yard catch and Jennings’ 45-yard reception.
Team Statistics Behind the Result
The individual numbers become more useful when viewed against the full team statistics.
| Category | 49ers | Eagles |
| First Downs | 20 | 19 |
| Passing First Downs | 13 | 7 |
| Rushing First Downs | 5 | 11 |
| Total Yards | 361 | 307 |
| Offensive Plays | 58 | 72 |
| Yards per Play | 6.2 | 4.3 |
| Passing Yards | 286 net | 167 net |
| Rushing Yards | 75 | 140 |
| Third Down | 6/11 | 5/16 |
| Fourth Down | 0/0 | 3/5 |
| Turnovers | 2 | 0 |
| Time of Possession | 24:21 | 35:39 |
This table creates one of the most interesting statistical profiles of the game.
Philadelphia had the ball for more than 35 minutes. San Francisco had it for less than 25 minutes.
Philadelphia also ran 72 offensive plays compared with 58 for San Francisco.
Yet the 49ers gained 361 yards compared with 307 for the Eagles.
That means San Francisco was significantly more productive on a per-play basis.
Explosiveness vs. Volume
The Eagles had volume.
The 49ers had efficiency and explosiveness.
Philadelphia’s 72 plays produced 307 yards, or 4.3 yards per play.
San Francisco’s 58 plays produced 361 yards, or 6.2 yards per play.
That is a difference of 1.9 yards per play.
Over a large number of plays, that gap is substantial.
It helps explain how San Francisco could win despite losing the possession battle.
Third-Down Efficiency Was Another Major Difference
San Francisco converted six of 11 third downs, a 54.5 percent conversion rate.
Philadelphia converted five of 16, only 31.3 percent.
This is one of the clearest statistical reasons the game tilted toward San Francisco.
Philadelphia actually converted three of five fourth-down attempts, which shows the Eagles were willing and able to extend drives. But repeatedly reaching fourth down is not the same as consistently succeeding on third down.
San Francisco more frequently avoided those high-pressure fourth-down situations by converting earlier.
That helped compensate for the Eagles’ possession advantage.
Turnovers Were a Major Contradiction
The 49ers threw two interceptions.
Philadelphia threw none.
Normally, that would strongly favor the team that protected the football.
But San Francisco still won.
This is one of the most important lessons from the game.
Turnovers are powerful, but they are not independent of everything else happening on the field.
San Francisco created enough explosive offensive production and late scoring efficiency to overcome the two interceptions.
Philadelphia’s inability to capitalize fully on those takeaways was therefore significant.
The Eagles finished with zero turnovers, while the 49ers had two.
Yet the 49ers also had zero lost fumbles, meaning both of their recorded fumbles were retained.
Quinyon Mitchell’s Two Interceptions
Quinyon Mitchell was responsible for both Philadelphia interceptions.
He recorded two interceptions and returned them for a combined three yards.
From a defensive standpoint, that was one of the strongest individual performances by an Eagles player.
Mitchell successfully ended two San Francisco possessions.
However, those interceptions did not translate into enough points to secure the game.
This distinction is critical.
A turnover is valuable because it changes possession. Its ultimate value depends on what happens afterward.
Philadelphia’s defense created two interceptions, but the Eagles still lost because the offense could not consistently turn advantageous situations into touchdowns.
Special Teams Also Played a Role
Jake Elliott made both of his field-goal attempts for Philadelphia, hitting from 41 and 33 yards.
However, he converted only one of two extra-point attempts.
Eddy Pineiro made his lone field-goal attempt from 36 yards and converted two of three extra points.
The missed extra points mattered.
Philadelphia’s first touchdown produced six points rather than seven. San Francisco also missed one extra point after its final touchdown, but by that point the 49ers had already established a four-point advantage.
The kicking statistics therefore affected the scoring margin even though neither team’s kicker had a disastrous field-goal performance.
Punting Comparison
Thomas Morstead punted three times for 103 yards, averaging 34.3 yards.
Braden Mann punted four times for 208 yards, averaging 52.0 yards, with a long of 58.
Mann’s raw punting numbers were stronger.
Philadelphia also received solid kickoff return production from Britain Covey, who had two returns for 61 yards.
San Francisco’s Brian Robinson Jr. returned three kickoffs for 64 yards, while Skyy Moore added two for 42 yards.
Special teams therefore provided useful field-position contributions on both sides, but the game was ultimately decided by offensive execution.
The Weather and Setting
The official NFL game summary listed cloudy conditions, a temperature of 46°F, humidity of 44 percent, and northwest winds of 22 mph at Lincoln Financial Field.
The wind is worth mentioning when interpreting the passing statistics.
The game was not played in a neutral indoor environment with perfect passing conditions. Both teams operated in an outdoor playoff setting with significant wind.
Despite that, San Francisco produced 291 gross passing yards and 286 net passing yards, while Philadelphia produced 168 gross and 167 net passing yards.
That makes San Francisco’s passing efficiency particularly notable.
Why the 49ers Won Despite Losing Time of Possession
The simplest explanation is efficiency.
Philadelphia possessed the ball for 35:39.
San Francisco possessed it for 24:21.
The Eagles ran 72 plays.
The 49ers ran only 58.
Philadelphia gained 140 rushing yards.
San Francisco gained only 75.
Yet San Francisco gained 54 more total yards.
The reason is the passing game.
San Francisco generated 286 net passing yards compared with Philadelphia’s 167. The 49ers also produced 13 passing first downs compared with seven for the Eagles.
This was a game in which the Eagles’ ability to sustain possession did not produce enough explosive scoring opportunities.
San Francisco’s offense was more dangerous on fewer plays.
That is perhaps the single most important statistical conclusion from the matchup.
Fourth Quarter Player Impact
The fourth quarter deserves separate attention because the game’s most influential players were at their best late.
San Francisco scored 13 points.
Philadelphia scored only three.
The 49ers’ scoring came through two McCaffrey touchdown receptions.
The first came on a 29-yard pass from Jennings.
The second came on a four-yard pass from Purdy.
Philadelphia’s only fourth-quarter score was Elliott’s 33-yard field goal.
The difference was not simply that San Francisco scored touchdowns and Philadelphia kicked a field goal.
It was also about the ability to create touchdowns when field position became critical.
San Francisco entered the final period trailing 16-10 and finished the game with a 23-19 victory.
That six-point fourth-quarter swing was the decisive statistical story.
A Closer Look at the Final 66-Yard Drive
San Francisco’s winning drive began after Philadelphia took a 19-17 lead.
Purdy completed a short pass to Juszczyk, scrambled for five yards, then connected with Robinson for 16 yards.
After an incompletion, Purdy found McCaffrey for 11 yards.
McCaffrey then added a four-yard run before the drive eventually reached the Philadelphia 4-yard line.
Purdy’s final touchdown pass to McCaffrey put San Francisco ahead 23-19.
This sequence shows why box-score analysis should include drive context.
Purdy did not simply finish the game with two touchdowns. He generated the game’s most important offensive possession after his team fell behind.
That is a stronger measure of postseason value than the raw passing total alone.
What the Player Stats Say About San Francisco’s Offensive Approach
San Francisco’s statistical profile suggests an offense built around efficiency, versatility, and explosive passing.
The 49ers did not dominate on the ground.
McCaffrey averaged only 3.2 yards per carry.
The team averaged 3.0 yards per rush.
But San Francisco did not need to win the rushing efficiency battle because its passing game created enough value.
Robinson averaged 18.5 yards per reception.
Jennings averaged 45 yards on his single reception.
McCaffrey averaged 11 yards per catch.
Juszczyk averaged 12.3 yards per catch.
Those numbers show a broad distribution of meaningful gains.
San Francisco also used Jennings creatively as a passer.
The result was a passing attack that forced Philadelphia to defend several different types of threats.
What the Player Stats Say About Philadelphia’s Offensive Approach
Philadelphia’s statistical profile was more possession-oriented.
The Eagles ran 36 times.
Barkley received 26 carries.
Hurts added five rushing attempts.
The team gained 140 rushing yards.
Philadelphia also converted three of five fourth downs.
Those numbers indicate an offense that was willing to stay on the field, lean on the running game, and extend drives.
The problem was efficiency in the passing game.
Hurts completed 20 of 35 passes for 168 yards.
Smith led the receiving group with 70 yards.
No Philadelphia receiver exceeded 70 yards.
No Eagles receiver had a catch longer than 20 yards.
Against a San Francisco offense that generated a 61-yard reception, a 45-yard reception, and multiple other substantial gains, that lack of explosive receiving production became costly.
The Most Important Statistical Matchups
Brock Purdy vs. Jalen Hurts
Purdy:
- 18/31
- 262 yards
- 2 TD
- 2 INT
- 80.3 rating
Hurts:
- 20/35
- 168 yards
- 1 TD
- 0 INT
- 79.2 rating
Hurts was better in turnover avoidance.
Purdy was better in yardage and touchdown production.
The late-game advantage went to Purdy.
Christian McCaffrey vs. Saquon Barkley
McCaffrey:
- 15 carries
- 48 rushing yards
- 6 receptions
- 66 receiving yards
- 2 receiving touchdowns
- 114 total yards
Barkley:
- 26 carries
- 106 rushing yards
- 3 receptions
- 25 receiving yards
- 131 total yards
Barkley had more total yardage.
McCaffrey had greater scoring impact.
That distinction captures the game well.
Demarcus Robinson vs. DeVonta Smith
Robinson produced 111 yards and a touchdown on six receptions.
Smith produced 70 yards on eight receptions.
Smith was the more frequently used receiver.
Robinson was the more explosive receiver.
San Francisco benefited from Robinson’s ability to turn a small number of catches into large chunks of field position.
What the Final Score Does Not Tell You
A 23-19 score suggests a close game, and it was.
But the underlying numbers reveal an unusual matchup.
Philadelphia had:
- More possession
- More offensive plays
- More rushing yards
- Zero turnovers
- More fourth-down conversions
San Francisco had:
- More total yards
- More passing yards
- More passing first downs
- Better third-down efficiency
- Better yards per play
- More touchdowns
That is why the game should not be described simply as a case of one team being statistically better across the board.
Philadelphia won several important categories.
San Francisco won the categories most closely connected to explosive offensive efficiency and scoring.
Key Takeaways From the Match Player Statistics
Several conclusions stand out when the complete numbers are considered.
1. San Francisco won through passing efficiency
The 49ers produced 286 net passing yards compared with Philadelphia’s 167.
That was the largest offensive statistical gap in the game.
2. Philadelphia won the rushing battle
The Eagles produced 140 rushing yards compared with 75 for San Francisco.
Barkley was responsible for 106 of those yards.
3. McCaffrey was the biggest scoring weapon
His two fourth-quarter touchdown receptions were the difference between defeat and victory.
4. Robinson provided the explosive receiving element
His 111 yards and 61-yard reception gave San Francisco a major big-play advantage.
5. Purdy’s mistakes did not define the game
He threw two interceptions but responded with the winning touchdown drive.
6. Hurts protected the football but lacked explosive passing production
His zero interceptions were valuable, but 168 passing yards were not enough to match San Francisco’s offensive efficiency.
7. Philadelphia’s two defensive interceptions were not enough
Quinyon Mitchell produced two takeaways, yet Philadelphia could not turn those opportunities into enough points.
8. Third down favored San Francisco
The 49ers converted 54.5 percent of their third downs, while Philadelphia converted 31.3 percent.
9. Time of possession favored Philadelphia but did not determine the winner
The Eagles had the ball for more than 35 minutes, yet San Francisco gained more yards and scored more points.
10. The fourth quarter decided everything
San Francisco entered the fourth quarter down six and finished with a four-point victory.
Philadelphia Eagles vs 49ers Match Player Stats: Final Assessment
The Philadelphia Eagles vs 49ers match player stats reveal a playoff game in which efficiency ultimately defeated possession.
Philadelphia’s strongest statistical performance came on the ground. Barkley surpassed 100 rushing yards, the Eagles gained 140 rushing yards, and the team controlled the clock for more than 35 minutes. Hurts also avoided interceptions, while Quinyon Mitchell intercepted Purdy twice.
Those are normally strong foundations for a postseason victory.
San Francisco nevertheless found the more valuable offensive formula.
Purdy threw for 262 yards and two touchdowns despite his interceptions. Robinson produced 111 receiving yards and an early touchdown. McCaffrey contributed 114 yards from scrimmage and caught both of San Francisco’s fourth-quarter touchdowns. Jennings added one of the game’s most unusual and important plays with a 29-yard touchdown pass to McCaffrey.
The team-level numbers reinforce the individual performances.
The 49ers gained 361 total yards on only 58 offensive plays. Philadelphia gained 307 yards on 72 plays. San Francisco averaged 6.2 yards per play, compared with 4.3 for Philadelphia.
That difference is the statistical fingerprint of the game.
The Eagles consistently moved the ball enough to maintain possession, but the 49ers generated more value from each opportunity. Their passing attack created explosive gains, and their best players delivered their biggest contributions in the fourth quarter.
The final sequence made the difference unmistakable.
Philadelphia moved ahead 19-17 with eight minutes remaining. San Francisco answered with a 66-yard touchdown drive, capped by Purdy’s four-yard touchdown pass to McCaffrey. Philadelphia then drove into San Francisco territory but failed on fourth down, allowing the 49ers to kneel out the remaining seconds.
For readers studying player performance, the most important lesson is that raw totals should always be considered alongside efficiency, game situation, scoring value, and the timing of production.
Barkley had more total yards than McCaffrey.
Hurts threw no interceptions.
Mitchell had two interceptions.
Philadelphia controlled possession.
Yet San Francisco won.
The explanation is found in the combination of explosive passing, third-down efficiency, fourth-quarter execution, and McCaffrey’s scoring impact.
That is what makes this matchup particularly useful for understanding NFL playoff statistics. A box score is not merely a collection of numbers. It is a record of how those numbers interacted with field position, efficiency, possession, turnovers, and game situation.
In this case, the final 23-19 result reflected San Francisco’s ability to turn fewer offensive opportunities into more productive plays when the game was decided.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who won the 49ers vs Eagles playoff game on January 11, 2026?
The San Francisco 49ers defeated the Philadelphia Eagles 23-19 in the NFC Wild Card playoffs at Lincoln Financial Field.
How many passing yards did Brock Purdy have against the Eagles?
Brock Purdy completed 18 of 31 passes for 262 yards, two touchdowns, and two interceptions.
How many rushing yards did Saquon Barkley have?
Saquon Barkley rushed 26 times for 106 yards, averaging 4.1 yards per carry, with a long run of 29 yards.
Who was the leading receiver in the 49ers vs Eagles game?
Demarcus Robinson led all San Francisco receivers with six catches for 111 yards and one touchdown. DeVonta Smith led Philadelphia with eight receptions for 70 yards.
How many touchdowns did Christian McCaffrey score?
McCaffrey caught two touchdown passes in the fourth quarter. One was a 29-yard touchdown from Jauan Jennings, and the other was a four-yard touchdown from Brock Purdy.
How many interceptions did Quinyon Mitchell have?
Quinyon Mitchell intercepted Brock Purdy twice and returned the interceptions for a combined three yards.
Conclusion
The Philadelphia Eagles vs 49ers match player stats show why the 23-19 result was much closer and more nuanced than a basic box-score summary suggests.
Philadelphia’s rushing attack, led by Saquon Barkley, was productive. Jalen Hurts protected the football, DeVonta Smith led the team in receptions, Dallas Goedert scored twice, and Quinyon Mitchell recorded two interceptions.
San Francisco answered with greater passing efficiency and more explosive plays. Brock Purdy threw for 262 yards and three total passing touchdowns were recorded by the 49ers when Jauan Jennings’ touchdown pass is included. Demarcus Robinson topped 100 receiving yards, while Christian McCaffrey produced 114 yards from scrimmage and scored the two fourth-quarter touchdowns that ultimately decided the game.
The most revealing team statistics were San Francisco’s 6.2 yards per play, 286 net passing yards, and 54.5 percent third-down conversion rate. Philadelphia’s 35:39 time of possession and 140 rushing yards were impressive, but they did not overcome the 49ers’ superior efficiency and late-game execution.
Ultimately, this was a game where the winning team’s biggest contributions arrived at the most important moments. The fourth-quarter performances of Purdy, McCaffrey, Jennings, and Robinson explain the final result more clearly than any single headline statistic.
