Oklahoma City Thunder vs Knicks Match Player Stats

Oklahoma City Thunder vs Knicks Match Player Stats

The oklahoma city thunder vs knicks match player stats from the March 29, 2026 meeting tell a much more detailed story than the 111-100 final score alone. Oklahoma City defeated New York at Paycom Center, but the game was competitive for long stretches. The Knicks led important stretches through Jalen Brunson’s scoring and Karl-Anthony Towns’ rebounding, while the Thunder created separation through Shai Gilgeous-Alexander’s fourth-quarter scoring, Jalen Williams’ efficient offense, and a major free-throw advantage. (NBA.com)

For readers researching this matchup, the most useful approach is not simply to list the leading scorers. Player statistics reveal how each team created opportunities, where possessions were lost, which players controlled the glass, and why Oklahoma City was able to turn a close game into an 11-point victory.

One important date note is worth making at the start. The supplied data identifies the game as March 30, 2026, while the official NBA game record lists it as Sunday, March 29, 2026. The venue, score, attendance, player performances, and quarter-by-quarter results otherwise correspond to the same game. (NBA.com)

Table of Contents

Oklahoma City Thunder vs Knicks Match Player Stats: Game Overview

The Oklahoma City Thunder finished the game with a 111-100 victory over the New York Knicks. The game was played at Paycom Center in Oklahoma City in front of 18,203 fans.

The final score was built gradually rather than through one dominant opening quarter.

Quarter New York Knicks Oklahoma City Thunder
1st 23 26
2nd 29 27
3rd 26 31
4th 22 27
Final 100 111

Oklahoma City opened the game with a three-point advantage, but New York answered in the second quarter by scoring 29 points compared with Oklahoma City’s 27. At halftime, the Thunder led 53-52.

The third quarter became a major turning point. Oklahoma City scored 31 points while holding New York to 26, creating a five-point advantage in the period. The Thunder entered the fourth quarter ahead 84-78.

New York did not immediately disappear in the final period. The Knicks cut the deficit to one point at one stage, but Oklahoma City responded and eventually closed the game 111-100. The official NBA recap reports that Shai Gilgeous-Alexander scored 10 of his 30 points in the fourth quarter, providing an important late-game scoring burst. (NBA.com)

That sequence is important when examining the individual numbers. Brunson actually finished with more points than Gilgeous-Alexander, yet Oklahoma City still won comfortably enough in the final margin.

Team Statistical Comparison

The team numbers explain several reasons the Thunder came away with the victory.

Category Knicks Thunder
Field Goals 36-82 35-75
Field Goal Percentage 44% 47%
Three-Pointers 15-35 10-28
Three-Point Percentage 43% 36%
Free Throws 13-17 31-38
Free-Throw Percentage 76% 82%
Rebounds 41 39
Assists 19 21
Turnovers 18 13
Steals 8 10
Blocks 3 0
Offensive Rebounds 15 12
Defensive Rebounds 26 27
Fouls 25 22

The first statistic that stands out is free-throw production.

The Knicks attempted 17 free throws and made 13. Oklahoma City attempted 38 and converted 31. That created an 18-point difference in made free throws.

The official game recap specifically identified the free-throw margin as a major factor, noting that Oklahoma City outscored New York 31-13 from the line. (NBA.com)

This does not mean the Thunder were better in every shooting category. In fact, New York had the superior three-point percentage, making 15 of 35 attempts for 43%. Oklahoma City made 10 of 28 for 36%.

The Thunder’s advantage came from the combination of efficient overall shooting, more free-throw opportunities, fewer turnovers, and stronger late-game execution.

Jalen Brunson Leads the Knicks in Scoring

Jalen Brunson was the highest-scoring player for New York.

He finished with:

  • 32 points
  • 5 rebounds
  • 5 assists
  • 4 turnovers
  • 13-of-22 shooting from the field
  • 4-of-7 shooting from three-point range
  • 2-of-4 shooting from the free-throw line

Brunson’s 32 points represented a significant scoring contribution. He also shot 59.1% from the field based on his 13 made shots on 22 attempts.

His four three-pointers added another important dimension. New York needed Brunson to generate offense against a Thunder team that could create turnovers and transition opportunities.

However, scoring volume alone did not determine the result. Brunson’s five assists show that he was also involved in creating offense, but New York ultimately finished with only 19 team assists while committing 18 turnovers.

That combination limited the efficiency of the Knicks’ offensive possessions.

The official NBA and ESPN box scores both list Brunson as New York’s leading scorer with 32 points. (NBA.com)

Karl-Anthony Towns Controls the Rebounding Battle

Karl-Anthony Towns produced one of the most notable individual rebounding performances in the game.

He recorded:

  • 15 points
  • 18 rebounds
  • 2 assists
  • 4 turnovers
  • 1 steal
  • 7 offensive rebounds
  • 11 defensive rebounds

The 18 rebounds were the highest total by any player in the game.

More importantly, seven of those rebounds came on the offensive glass.

Offensive rebounds are especially valuable because they create additional possessions. Towns repeatedly gave New York opportunities to extend possessions after missed shots.

The Knicks finished with 15 offensive rebounds as a team, compared with 12 for Oklahoma City. Therefore, New York actually held an advantage in second-chance opportunities.

That makes the final result more interesting. The Knicks were not beaten because they simply could not rebound. Instead, the Thunder’s advantage came from other areas, especially free throws and turnovers.

Towns’ 15 points also came on 5-of-9 shooting. His scoring efficiency was strong, but his offensive influence was arguably more visible through his rebounding.

Josh Hart Provides Efficient Scoring

Josh Hart finished with 15 points, six rebounds, three assists, one turnover, and two steals.

His shooting line was particularly efficient:

  • 5-of-9 from the field
  • 5-of-7 from three-point range

That means Hart made five three-pointers while attempting only seven.

His three-point shooting helped New York stay within reach, especially during the stretches when Oklahoma City was attempting to create separation.

Hart also contributed across several categories rather than functioning only as a scorer. His six rebounds, three assists, and two steals provided additional value.

The official box score lists Hart at 15 points with a 5-of-9 shooting performance and five made three-pointers. (NBA.com)

Mikal Bridges Adds 15 Points

Mikal Bridges also scored 15 points for New York.

His numbers were:

  • 15 points
  • 1 rebound
  • 1 assist
  • 2 turnovers
  • 4 steals
  • 6-of-11 field goals
  • 2-of-5 three-pointers
  • 1-of-2 free throws

The four steals were particularly significant.

Bridges was one of New York’s most active defensive players statistically, and his defensive activity helped produce extra possessions. Yet Oklahoma City still finished with 13 turnovers compared with 18 for New York.

This is an important distinction. Individual defensive activity can be strong without necessarily producing a team-wide advantage in possession control.

Other Knicks Player Contributions

OG Anunoby finished with 10 points, three assists, one steal, and one turnover. He shot 2-of-9 from the field but converted all four of his free throws.

Jose Alvarado contributed eight points, three rebounds, four assists, and four turnovers.

Mitchell Robinson scored three points and added four rebounds and two blocks.

Jordan Clarkson scored two points and grabbed three rebounds.

These contributions show the difference between statistical involvement and offensive efficiency. Several Knicks players contributed in specific areas, but New York did not receive enough consistent scoring outside its primary contributors.

The team ultimately shot 36-of-82 from the field, or 44%.

Shai Gilgeous-Alexander Leads Oklahoma City

Shai Gilgeous-Alexander finished with 30 points, making him the Thunder’s leading scorer.

His final line included:

  • 30 points
  • 3 rebounds
  • 4 assists
  • 4 turnovers
  • 1 steal
  • 13-of-16 free throws

His free-throw shooting was one of the defining parts of his performance.

Although Gilgeous-Alexander struggled from the field during the first three quarters, the official NBA recap notes that he made all three of his fourth-quarter field-goal attempts and scored 10 points in the final period. (NBA.com)

That fourth-quarter performance changed the shape of the game.

New York had reduced Oklahoma City’s advantage to one point during the final period. Instead of allowing the Knicks to take control, Gilgeous-Alexander helped the Thunder respond.

His 30-point total also extended his remarkable scoring consistency during the season, according to the AP recap carried by NBA.com. (NBA.com)

Jalen Williams Provides Efficient Secondary Scoring

Jalen Williams scored 22 points for Oklahoma City.

His statistical line included:

  • 22 points
  • 1 rebound
  • 2 assists
  • 2 turnovers
  • 1 steal
  • 7-of-11 field goals
  • 7-of-7 free throws

Williams’ efficiency stands out immediately.

He made seven of his 11 field-goal attempts, giving him a 63.6% field-goal percentage. He also made every free throw he attempted.

The official game recap highlighted his 22-point performance and noted that he shot 7-of-11 from the field while making all seven of his free throws. (NBA.com)

For Oklahoma City, this type of secondary production reduced the pressure on Gilgeous-Alexander to create every scoring opportunity.

Chet Holmgren’s Two-Way Contribution

Chet Holmgren added 16 points and nine rebounds.

He also recorded:

  • 2 assists
  • 1 turnover
  • 1 steal

Holmgren’s nine rebounds were second among Thunder players behind Isaiah Hartenstein’s 13.

His presence gave Oklahoma City another frontcourt scoring option while also helping the Thunder compete against Towns and New York’s collection of rebounders.

Although the Thunder did not record a block as a team in the supplied statistical data, Holmgren still contributed defensively through positioning, rebounding, and activity.

The official NBA recap confirms his 16-point, nine-rebound performance. (NBA.com)

Isaiah Hartenstein Wins the Thunder Rebounding Battle

Isaiah Hartenstein recorded 13 rebounds, the highest total on the Oklahoma City roster.

His full statistical contribution included:

  • 6 points
  • 13 rebounds
  • 1 assist
  • 2 turnovers
  • 1 steal

Hartenstein’s rebounding was particularly useful because New York had a dominant individual rebounder in Towns.

Towns collected 18 rebounds, but Hartenstein’s 13 helped prevent Oklahoma City from being overwhelmed on the glass.

The game therefore featured an interesting frontcourt contrast. Towns produced the highest individual rebounding total, while Hartenstein provided enough production to help the Thunder remain competitive in the overall rebounding category.

Thunder Supporting Cast

Luguentz Dort scored 12 points, grabbed two rebounds, recorded one assist, and added two steals.

Ajay Mitchell had eight points, four rebounds, and five assists.

Alex Caruso finished with six points, two rebounds, two assists, one turnover, and one steal.

Cason Wallace scored five points and contributed one rebound, one assist, and one steal.

Jaylin Williams scored three points with one rebound and three assists.

Isaiah Joe scored three points, grabbed one rebound, and recorded one turnover and one steal.

This distribution is important because Oklahoma City did not depend entirely on one scorer.

The Thunder received double-digit scoring from Gilgeous-Alexander, Jalen Williams, Holmgren, and Dort. That gave the team four players reaching at least 12 points.

Why the Game Was Closer Than the Final Score

A final score of 111-100 can make a game look one-sided.

This matchup was not.

At halftime, Oklahoma City led only 53-52. The Knicks had just erased most of the Thunder’s early advantage after losing the opening quarter 26-23.

The third quarter changed the direction of the game, with Oklahoma City outscoring New York 31-26.

Even then, the Knicks remained close enough to challenge the Thunder in the fourth.

The official recap notes that New York cut Oklahoma City’s fourth-quarter advantage to one point before the Thunder pulled away. (NBA.com)

This context matters when analyzing player statistics.

A player who scores during a close fourth quarter can have a greater impact on the result than someone who accumulates points earlier in a comfortable game. Gilgeous-Alexander’s fourth-quarter scoring is therefore more meaningful than simply looking at the 30-point total.

The Free-Throw Difference Was Huge

The most obvious statistical separation was at the free-throw line.

New York:

  • 13 made
  • 17 attempts
  • 76%

Oklahoma City:

  • 31 made
  • 38 attempts
  • 82%

The Thunder made 18 more free throws than the Knicks.

The difference in made free throws alone was larger than Oklahoma City’s final 11-point winning margin.

That does not mean free throws were the only reason for the victory. Oklahoma City also shot better overall, turned the ball over less often, and produced more assists.

But the free-throw differential clearly played a central role.

It also explains why New York could shoot 43% from three-point range and still lose by double digits.

Turnovers Created Another Important Gap

The Knicks committed 18 turnovers.

The Thunder committed 13.

That five-turnover difference gave Oklahoma City additional opportunities while reducing the number of possessions New York could use to build momentum.

The Thunder also recorded 10 steals compared with eight for the Knicks.

This created a useful combination for Oklahoma City: more takeaways and fewer giveaways.

The NBA game summary shows Oklahoma City with 13 turnovers and New York with 18, while the Thunder also held an advantage in points off turnovers. (NBA.com)

For readers analyzing box scores, this is one of the clearest examples of why field-goal percentage should not be viewed in isolation.

Three-Point Shooting Favored New York

One of the unusual aspects of the matchup was that New York shot the ball better from three.

The Knicks made 15 of 35 attempts for 43%.

Oklahoma City made 10 of 28 for 36%.

New York therefore made five more three-pointers.

Yet Oklahoma City still won.

This shows how a team can lose the three-point battle and still win through other forms of offensive efficiency.

The Thunder scored more points inside, generated more free throws, and made fewer mistakes with the ball.

The official game summary lists Oklahoma City with 44 points in the paint compared with 30 for New York. (NBA.com)

That 14-point difference in paint scoring partially offset New York’s five-made-three-pointer advantage.

Points in the Paint Tell Another Story

The Thunder scored 44 points in the paint.

The Knicks scored 30.

That is a 14-point advantage for Oklahoma City.

When combined with the free-throw difference, this helps explain why the Thunder could win despite making fewer three-pointers.

New York’s perimeter shooting was efficient, but Oklahoma City consistently generated points closer to the basket.

The Thunder also recorded 15 fast-break points compared with four for the Knicks, according to the official game summary. (NBA.com)

That is an 11-point advantage in transition scoring.

Taken together, the Thunder’s interior scoring and transition production provided a strong counterbalance to New York’s three-point shooting.

Rebounding Was Surprisingly Close

The Knicks finished with 41 rebounds.

Oklahoma City finished with 39.

New York also collected 15 offensive rebounds compared with 12 for the Thunder.

That means the Knicks did not lose the game because they were dominated physically on the glass.

Karl-Anthony Towns was particularly strong, collecting 18 rebounds.

However, Oklahoma City had multiple contributors. Hartenstein had 13 and Holmgren had nine, giving the Thunder a strong combined frontcourt presence.

This is an important lesson when reading team statistics: an individual advantage does not always become a team advantage.

Towns won the individual rebounding battle, but the Knicks did not convert that advantage into a victory.

Assists and Ball Movement

Oklahoma City finished with 21 assists.

New York finished with 19.

The two teams were relatively close in this category, so assists alone do not explain the result.

The more meaningful combination is assists plus turnovers.

Oklahoma City:

  • 21 assists
  • 13 turnovers

New York:

  • 19 assists
  • 18 turnovers

The Thunder therefore produced more assists while committing five fewer turnovers.

That created a more favorable balance between creating shots and protecting possessions.

A Closer Look at Plus-Minus

Plus-minus provides another layer of information.

Several Knicks players finished with negative plus-minus figures, including:

  • OG Anunoby: -17
  • Josh Hart: -12
  • Mikal Bridges: -15
  • Jalen Brunson: -13

Karl-Anthony Towns finished at -10.

On the Thunder side, the supplied box-score data shows several positive contributions from the supporting cast.

However, plus-minus should not be treated as an individual rating by itself. It measures the team’s point differential while a player is on the floor and can be influenced by lineups, opponent combinations, game situation, and teammate performance.

For that reason, it works best when considered alongside shooting, rebounding, assists, turnovers, and defensive statistics.

What the Player Statistics Reveal About Both Teams

The individual numbers reveal two different offensive structures.

New York leaned heavily on Brunson’s scoring. His 32 points were 32% of the Knicks’ 100-point total.

Towns provided substantial rebounding, while Hart and Bridges each scored 15.

Oklahoma City had a more distributed scoring profile.

Gilgeous-Alexander scored 30, but Jalen Williams added 22, Holmgren had 16, and Dort scored 12.

That meant the Thunder’s four leading scorers combined for 80 points.

New York’s top four scorers combined for 77 points.

The difference is small, but the way those points were generated mattered.

Oklahoma City also received strong free-throw production from its leading players. Gilgeous-Alexander made 13 of 16, while Jalen Williams made all seven of his attempts.

Season Series Result

The supplied data records Oklahoma City as winning the season series 2-0 against New York.

The previous meeting listed was a 103-100 Thunder victory on March 5, 2026.

That means both meetings went in Oklahoma City’s favor, although the margins were different.

The March matchup was decided by three points, while the later game ended with an 11-point margin.

Looking at the two results together provides useful context for anyone researching the matchup historically. It shows that the teams played two competitive games, with Oklahoma City ultimately winning both.

Why Jalen Brunson’s 32 Points Were Not Enough

Brunson’s performance deserves special attention because he scored more than any other player.

Thirty-two points on 13-of-22 shooting is a productive offensive performance.

But basketball games are decided by team possessions, not individual scoring totals.

New York’s 18 turnovers reduced the number of opportunities available to its offense.

The Knicks also had fewer free-throw attempts and made 18 fewer free throws than Oklahoma City.

So while Brunson was highly productive as a scorer, the overall offensive environment around him was not enough to overcome the Thunder’s possession and free-throw advantages.

This is why a box-score analysis should never stop at the top scorer.

Why Shai Gilgeous-Alexander’s Fourth Quarter Matters

Gilgeous-Alexander’s game is another example of why timing matters.

He had struggled from the field through the first three quarters, according to the official recap. Yet he made all three of his fourth-quarter field-goal attempts and scored 10 points in the period. (NBA.com)

That late scoring arrived when the Knicks had reduced the deficit to one.

The sequence turned a competitive fourth quarter into a Thunder victory.

His 13-of-16 free-throw shooting also helped him reach 30 points despite not having an exceptionally efficient shooting night from the field.

The result is a useful distinction between raw scoring and game-changing scoring.

Key Statistical Takeaways

The most important numbers from the matchup can be summarized as follows:

  1. Final score: Oklahoma City 111, New York 100.
  2. Leading scorer: Jalen Brunson with 32 points.
  3. Thunder leading scorer: Shai Gilgeous-Alexander with 30 points.
  4. Top rebounder: Karl-Anthony Towns with 18.
  5. Thunder’s top rebounder: Isaiah Hartenstein with 13.
  6. Thunder secondary scorer: Jalen Williams with 22.
  7. Thunder third scorer: Chet Holmgren with 16.
  8. Free throws: Oklahoma City made 31 compared with New York’s 13.
  9. Turnovers: New York committed 18 compared with Oklahoma City’s 13.
  10. Three-point shooting: New York made 43% compared with Oklahoma City’s 36%.
  11. Points in the paint: Oklahoma City led 44-30.
  12. Fast-break points: Oklahoma City led 15-4.
  13. Rebounds: New York led 41-39.
  14. Season series: Oklahoma City won both meetings listed in the supplied data.

These figures show why the game cannot be explained by one category.

What Fans and Stat Readers Should Look For in Similar Games

When researching future matchups between these teams, several categories are especially useful.

1. Free-Throw Attempts

The difference in free-throw attempts can dramatically change the scoring equation.

A team can shoot well from three and still lose if the opponent repeatedly reaches the line.

2. Turnover Differential

Five fewer turnovers can create several additional possessions.

Those possessions become even more valuable when the opposing team has strong transition scorers.

3. Paint Scoring

Points in the paint can expose whether a team is relying too heavily on perimeter shooting.

Oklahoma City’s 44-30 advantage in this game was substantial.

4. Fourth-Quarter Efficiency

Close games can change rapidly in the final period.

Gilgeous-Alexander’s fourth-quarter performance demonstrates why fourth-quarter numbers can be more informative than full-game scoring totals alone.

5. Secondary Scoring

A team’s star player can produce an excellent game and still lose if the supporting cast cannot maintain offensive pressure.

Oklahoma City received 22 points from Jalen Williams and 16 from Holmgren, helping reduce the burden on Gilgeous-Alexander.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who scored the most points in the Thunder vs Knicks game?

Jalen Brunson led all players with 32 points for New York. Shai Gilgeous-Alexander led Oklahoma City with 30 points.

What was the final score between the Knicks and Thunder?

The Oklahoma City Thunder defeated the New York Knicks 111-100.

Who had the most rebounds in the game?

Karl-Anthony Towns led all players with 18 rebounds. Isaiah Hartenstein led Oklahoma City with 13 rebounds.

How many points did Shai Gilgeous-Alexander score?

Shai Gilgeous-Alexander scored 30 points, including 10 points in the fourth quarter.

How many points did Jalen Brunson score?

Jalen Brunson scored 32 points on 13-of-22 shooting from the field.

Why did the Thunder win despite the Knicks shooting better from three?

Oklahoma City compensated with a major free-throw advantage, fewer turnovers, more points in the paint, and more fast-break points. The Thunder made 31 free throws compared with 13 for New York.

Conclusion

The oklahoma city thunder vs knicks match player stats show a game in which individual performances were strong on both sides, but the overall statistical profile favored Oklahoma City.

Jalen Brunson delivered the game’s highest scoring total with 32 points, while Karl-Anthony Towns dominated the rebounding category with 18 boards. Josh Hart and Mikal Bridges each added 15 points, and New York shot 43% from three-point range.

Oklahoma City answered with balanced scoring. Shai Gilgeous-Alexander produced 30 points and took control late, Jalen Williams added 22 points on efficient shooting, Chet Holmgren recorded 16 points and nine rebounds, and Luguentz Dort contributed 12.

The clearest differences appeared in free throws, turnovers, paint scoring, and transition offense. The Thunder made 31 free throws compared with 13 for the Knicks, committed five fewer turnovers, scored 14 more points in the paint, and held an 11-point advantage in fast-break scoring. (NBA.com)

At the same time, New York’s advantages should not be ignored. The Knicks had more total rebounds, more offensive rebounds, and a much better three-point percentage. Those numbers help explain why the contest remained close into the fourth quarter.

Ultimately, the box score demonstrates why player statistics are most useful when viewed together. Brunson’s 32 points and Towns’ 18 rebounds were impressive individual figures, but Oklahoma City’s balanced scoring, possession control, free-throw production, and late-game execution produced the 111-100 result.

For anyone studying this matchup, the most useful takeaway is to look beyond the leading scorer. The interaction between shooting efficiency, free throws, turnovers, rebounding, paint scoring, transition points, and fourth-quarter production provides a much clearer picture of how the game was actually won.

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *