Houston Rockets vs 76ers Match Player Stats

The houston rockets vs 76ers match player stats from the July 14, 2026 NBA Summer League meeting tell a much clearer story than the 90-64 final score alone. Houston controlled the game from the opening quarter, shot more efficiently, won the rebounding battle, created more defensive disruption, and received balanced scoring from several players. Philadelphia had Labaron Philon Jr. lead the team with 17 points, but the Sixers struggled to generate consistent offense against a Houston defense that stayed in control for all four quarters.

The game took place at the Thomas & Mack Center in Las Vegas during the 2026 NBA Summer League. Houston finished with 90 points while Philadelphia scored 64, producing a 26-point margin. The Rockets led 17-8 after the first quarter, extended the advantage to 41-25 by halftime, and never allowed Philadelphia to build a serious comeback.

For readers looking beyond the final score, this matchup is especially useful because the player numbers show how Houston built its advantage. Isaiah Crawford led all scorers with 19 points and posted a game-best plus-minus of +34. Bruce Thornton added 18 points, four assists and two steals, while Tristen Newton scored 17 points. Philadelphia’s Philon was productive individually, but his -24 plus-minus illustrates the difference between individual production and overall team impact.

Houston Rockets vs 76ers Match Player Stats

The most important numbers from the game are straightforward. Houston scored 90 points on 30-of-72 shooting, while Philadelphia managed 64 points on 23-of-74 shooting.

Category	Houston Rockets	Philadelphia 76ers
Final Score	90	64
Field Goals	30/72	23/74
Field Goal %	42%	31%
3-Pointers	8/32	5/30
3-Point %	25%	17%
Free Throws	12/16	9/16
Free Throw %	75%	56%
Rebounds	47	35
Assists	17	12
Turnovers	19	19
Steals	11	8
Blocks	4	2

The numbers reveal that Houston did not win because of one isolated statistical category. The Rockets were better in several areas at once.

Their 42% field-goal shooting compared with Philadelphia’s 31% created the largest offensive difference. Houston also won the glass by 12 rebounds and converted free throws at a much better rate.

The official NBA game record confirms the 90-64 final score, Houston’s 17-8 first-quarter lead, and the Rockets’ 24-point halftime advantage. official NBA game summary

That combination is important because a 26-point victory can sometimes be misleading in Summer League basketball. Here, however, the underlying numbers support the margin.

Houston Rockets Player Stats

Isaiah Crawford Leads Houston

Isaiah Crawford was the standout performer and the clearest individual difference-maker.

He finished with:

• 19 points
• 6 rebounds
• 3 assists
• 2 blocks
• 2 made three-pointers
• 6-of-12 field goals
• 3-of-3 free throws
• +34 plus-minus

Crawford’s scoring efficiency was particularly valuable. He shot 50% from the field and also made both of his three-point attempts. His ability to contribute away from scoring made his performance more complete than a simple points total suggests.

The +34 figure is arguably the most revealing number attached to his performance. Houston won by 26 points overall, yet Crawford’s minutes were associated with a substantially larger advantage. That does not mean plus-minus alone proves he was responsible for the margin, but it provides useful context when combined with his scoring, rebounding, passing and defensive work.

His two blocks also mattered. Philadelphia struggled to score efficiently throughout the game, and Houston’s defensive pressure made it difficult for the Sixers to find easy possessions.

Bruce Thornton Provides Two-Way Production

Bruce Thornton scored 18 points and supplied one of Houston’s best all-around performances.

His line included:

• 18 points
• 2 rebounds
• 4 assists
• 2 steals
• 5-of-9 field goals
• 3-of-7 three-pointers
• 3-of-5 free throws
• +31 plus-minus

Thornton’s 5-of-9 shooting translated to 55.6% from the field. More importantly, he gave Houston another reliable scoring option alongside Crawford.

His three-point shooting was also significant. Thornton hit three triples on seven attempts, giving Philadelphia another perimeter threat to account for.

The four assists demonstrate another important part of his game. Houston did not rely entirely on individual shot creation. Thornton could score when opportunities appeared while also helping organize the offense.

Tristen Newton Adds 17 Points

Tristen Newton scored 17 points and continued Houston’s balanced offensive approach.

His statistical line:

• 17 points
• 6 rebounds
• 3 assists
• 1 steal
• 5-of-11 field goals
• 1-of-3 three-pointers
• 3-of-3 free throws
• +10 plus-minus

Newton’s six rebounds were especially useful for a guard. Houston finished with 47 total rebounds, and contributions from players across the lineup helped the Rockets maintain possession and limit Philadelphia’s second-chance opportunities.

Newton also made all three of his free throws. While three attempts are not enough to draw a major conclusion by themselves, Houston’s overall 75% free-throw shooting was substantially better than Philadelphia’s 56%.

Oscar Cluff Controls the Glass

Oscar Cluff did not lead Houston in scoring, but his nine rebounds were important.

Houston’s rebounding advantage was one of the clearest structural differences between the teams. The Rockets collected 47 rebounds compared with Philadelphia’s 35.

Cluff’s work around the basket helped Houston establish physical control without requiring him to become a high-volume scorer.

This is a useful reminder when examining Summer League player statistics. The player with the most points is not always the player who changes the game most effectively. Rebounding, screens, defensive positioning and second-chance opportunities can have a major impact even when they do not dominate the traditional box score.

Philadelphia 76ers Player Stats

Labaron Philon Jr. Leads Philadelphia

Labaron Philon Jr. was Philadelphia’s leading scorer with 17 points.

His line included:

• 17 points
• 2 rebounds
• 4 assists
• 2 steals
• 7-of-11 field goals
• -24 plus-minus

The most encouraging aspect of Philon’s performance was his shooting efficiency. He made seven of his 11 attempts, good for approximately 63.6% from the field.

That efficiency makes his 17-point performance more impressive than the raw scoring number suggests.

However, the team context was difficult. Philadelphia shot only 31% overall, and Houston consistently maintained control. Philon’s -24 plus-minus reflects the broader problem: his individual efficiency did not translate into enough overall offensive success for Philadelphia.

That distinction is important when evaluating young players. A Summer League game is not simply an exercise in identifying who scored the most points. It is also about determining whether a player’s skills contribute to winning possessions.

Dante Maddox Jr. Adds 10 Points

Dante Maddox Jr. finished with 10 points and was Philadelphia’s only other player listed among the team’s leading scorers at that level.

Philadelphia needed more offensive production around Philon. The Sixers scored only 64 points, meaning the team had limited margin for error whenever Houston scored efficiently.

Maddox’s contribution helped, but Philadelphia needed more consistent scoring from the rest of the lineup.

Taye Fields Contributes on Defense and the Boards

Taye Fields finished with:

• 6 rebounds
• 2 steals
• 2 points
• 1 assist

His scoring output was modest, but the six rebounds tied for Philadelphia’s best individual total from the supplied game data.

Fields also shared the team lead in steals with Philon, giving Philadelphia some defensive activity despite Houston’s overall offensive control.

This is another example of why looking only at points can produce an incomplete assessment. Fields contributed in areas that do not always receive headline attention.

Why Houston Won by 26 Points

The houston rockets vs 76ers match player stats become most useful when the numbers are connected to the flow of the game.

Houston’s advantage came from four major areas.

1. Houston Shot 42% While Philadelphia Shot 31%

The field-goal difference was the biggest offensive separator.

Houston made 30 of 72 attempts. Philadelphia made only 23 of 74.

That means Philadelphia attempted two more field goals but made seven fewer.

The difference was not simply volume. It was conversion.

A 31% shooting night creates pressure on every other area of the game. The defense has to work harder, rebounding becomes more important, and turnovers become more costly because missed shots already reduce scoring opportunities.

Houston avoided that problem by making 42% of its attempts.

2. Houston Won the Rebounding Battle 47-35

Houston grabbed 12 more rebounds.

That is a meaningful advantage over a full game.

Rebounding affects both sides of the floor. Offensive rebounds create additional possessions, while defensive rebounds end Philadelphia possessions and prevent second chances.

The Rockets’ ability to control the glass helped them turn their shooting advantage into a much larger scoreboard advantage.

3. Houston Shot Better From Three

The Rockets made 8 of 32 three-point attempts, while Philadelphia made 5 of 30.

Neither team shot particularly well from long range.

Houston’s 25% three-point rate was not dominant, but it was still better than Philadelphia’s 17%.

This distinction matters. Houston did not need an elite three-point shooting night because the Rockets were already more efficient inside the arc and at the free-throw line.

4. Houston Converted Free Throws More Efficiently

Houston went 12-of-16 from the free-throw line.

Philadelphia went 9-of-16.

The difference in attempts was minimal, but the conversion rates were substantially different.

Houston made 75% of its free throws compared with Philadelphia’s 56%.

In a close game, that could be decisive. In a 26-point game, it was one more layer of advantage that kept Philadelphia from generating enough points.

Quarter-by-Quarter Breakdown

The quarter scores show that Houston never surrendered control.

Quarter	Philadelphia	Houston	Houston Lead
First	8	17	9
Second	17	24	16
Third	19	24	21
Fourth	20	25	26

First Quarter: Houston Establishes Control

Houston opened with a 17-8 advantage.

The low scoring from both teams suggests an uneven offensive start, but Houston handled the opening period better.

The nine-point lead gave the Rockets room to operate without needing to chase the game.

Second Quarter: The Margin Expands

Houston added another 24 points in the second quarter while Philadelphia scored 17.

The Rockets therefore entered halftime with a 41-25 advantage.

This was the point where the game began to move away from Philadelphia.

Third Quarter: Philadelphia Fails to Close the Gap

Both teams scored 24 and 19 points respectively in the third quarter.

Philadelphia improved its offensive output, but Houston matched that improvement.

That is an important feature of the game. The Sixers did not collapse offensively after halftime. Instead, Houston simply remained more productive.

Fourth Quarter: Houston Finishes Strong

Houston scored 25 points in the fourth quarter.

Philadelphia scored 20.

The Rockets therefore increased their lead again rather than allowing Philadelphia to make the final period competitive.

That produced the 90-64 final.

The Biggest Statistical Mismatch

If one statistic has to be selected as the clearest explanation for the outcome, it is field-goal percentage.

Houston’s 42% shooting was 11 percentage points better than Philadelphia’s 31%.

That gap was enormous.

The Rockets also benefited from a 47-35 rebounding edge and better three-point and free-throw percentages.

Interestingly, both teams committed 19 turnovers.

That means turnovers did not explain the final result by themselves. Houston’s advantage came from what happened after those possessions were completed.

This is one of the most useful lessons from the game. A team does not necessarily need to win every category to dominate. Houston tied Philadelphia in turnovers but still controlled shooting, rebounding, assists, steals, blocks and scoring.

Individual Performance vs Team Impact

The game provides a useful case study in the difference between individual statistics and team performance.

Philon scored 17 points on 7-of-11 shooting. That was highly efficient.

Crawford scored 19 points on 6-of-12 shooting and finished +34.

Thornton scored 18 points while shooting 5-of-9 and finished +31.

Newton added 17 points.

Houston therefore had three players between 17 and 19 points.

Philadelphia had one player at 17 and one at 10.

That scoring distribution is one of the simplest ways to understand why the game became a blowout.

Houston’s offense did not need to depend on a single player.

If Crawford was not scoring, Thornton could create offense. If Thornton was not shooting, Newton could contribute. Meanwhile, Houston received additional production from the rest of the rotation.

Philadelphia did not have the same level of scoring balance.

Houston’s Defensive Impact

The Rockets finished with 11 steals and four blocks.

Philadelphia had eight steals and two blocks.

Houston therefore produced three more steals and twice as many blocks.

Those numbers help explain why Philadelphia’s offense struggled to maintain efficiency.

The Rockets’ defensive performance was not simply about preventing shots. It was also about creating pressure and disrupting possessions.

Houston’s defensive activity also helped generate transition opportunities.

The official game summary recorded Houston with 15 fast-break points compared with seven for Philadelphia, another indication that the Rockets converted defensive activity into offense.

What the Plus-Minus Numbers Tell Us

Plus-minus can be misunderstood.

It does not mean a player personally created every point scored while he was on the floor. It measures the team’s point differential during that player’s playing time.

That makes Crawford’s +34 especially notable in a game Houston won by 26.

Thornton’s +31 also stands out.

Newton was +10.

On Philadelphia’s side, Philon’s -24 was the lowest among the key players highlighted in the supplied data.

The difference between Philon’s individual scoring and his plus-minus is worth studying.

He played well as a scorer, but the team struggled while Houston maintained control.

This is exactly why a complete statistical analysis should never rely on one box-score category.

What the Match Says About Houston’s Summer League Approach

Houston’s performance suggested a balanced approach.

The Rockets did not rely on one player taking an extreme number of shots.

Crawford attempted 12 field goals, Thornton attempted nine, and Newton attempted 11.

That distribution helped Houston maintain offensive variety.

The Rockets also received contributions in several statistical categories:

• Crawford provided scoring, rebounding, assists and rim protection.
• Thornton provided scoring, playmaking and steals.
• Newton contributed scoring and rebounding.
• Cluff helped control the boards.
• Copeland provided additional defensive activity and playmaking.
• The overall team defense created 11 steals and four blocks.

This balance is particularly valuable in Summer League because rotations can change quickly and players are often competing for defined roles.

What Philadelphia Needs to Improve

Philadelphia’s biggest issue was not simply that it scored 64 points.

The larger problem was how difficult it was to create efficient offense.

A 31% field-goal percentage and 17% three-point percentage leave very little room for error.

The Sixers did show individual positives.

Philon shot efficiently.

Fields contributed six rebounds and two steals.

The team also generated eight steals.

But Philadelphia needed more reliable scoring from additional players.

The path forward is therefore fairly clear from the numbers:

1. Improve overall shot quality.
2. Generate more efficient perimeter looks.
3. Create more second-chance opportunities.
4. Reduce the number of possessions ending without productive shots.
5. Increase offensive balance around the primary scorer.

These are not abstract recommendations. Each connects directly to what happened in this game.

How to Read Summer League Player Statistics Correctly

Summer League statistics require more context than standard regular-season box scores.

Young players are often operating under different circumstances. Minutes can vary, rotations can be experimental, and players may be asked to demonstrate specific skills rather than simply maximize scoring.

That means readers should consider several categories together.

Start With Efficiency

Points are useful, but shooting percentage adds context.

A player scoring 18 points on nine shots is producing differently from someone scoring 18 points on 20 shots.

Look at Rebounding

Rebounding reveals how players influence possessions even when they are not scoring.

Houston’s 47-35 team advantage is a major reason the Rockets controlled the game.

Consider Playmaking

Assists can show whether a player is creating opportunities for teammates.

Thornton’s four assists were important because his contribution was not limited to scoring.

Check Defensive Activity

Steals and blocks provide a basic measure of defensive disruption.

Houston’s 11 steals and four blocks compared with Philadelphia’s eight steals and two blocks support the broader picture of Houston’s defensive pressure.

Use Plus-Minus Carefully

Plus-minus should be considered alongside the rest of the box score.

It is useful for understanding how the team performed during a player’s minutes, but it should never be treated as a standalone measure of individual quality.

Who Was the Best Player?

Based on the complete statistical picture, Isaiah Crawford deserves the strongest case for Houston’s top performer.

He led the game with 19 points, added six rebounds, three assists and two blocks, shot 50% from the field, made two three-pointers and finished +34.

Bruce Thornton has a strong argument as well because of his 18 points, four assists, two steals and 55.6% field-goal shooting.

For Philadelphia, Philon was the standout offensive player.

His 17 points on 7-of-11 shooting, along with four assists and two steals, gave him the strongest individual case among the Sixers.

However, Crawford’s combination of offense, defense and plus-minus gives him the clearest overall claim as the game’s most influential player.

Key Takeaways From the Match

The most important lessons from the houston rockets vs 76ers match player stats can be summarized in a few points.

Houston’s efficiency won the game. The Rockets shot 42% compared with Philadelphia’s 31%.

The Rockets controlled possession quality. Houston grabbed 47 rebounds, 12 more than Philadelphia.

Houston had multiple scoring options. Crawford, Thornton and Newton all reached at least 17 points.

Philadelphia had an efficient leading scorer. Philon scored 17 points on 7-of-11 shooting.

The three-point difference favored Houston. The Rockets made eight triples compared with five for Philadelphia.

Free throws also favored Houston. Houston shot 75% from the line while Philadelphia shot 56%.

Defense separated the teams. Houston finished with 11 steals and four blocks.

The game was never tied or led by Philadelphia. Houston built the advantage early and expanded it throughout the contest.

A Closer Look at the Offensive Balance

One of the most encouraging Houston statistics was the distribution of scoring.

Crawford scored 19.

Thornton scored 18.

Newton scored 17.

That is 54 points from three players.

Houston’s 90 total points therefore had a strong foundation before considering the contributions of the rest of the lineup.

Philadelphia, by comparison, had Philon with 17 and Maddox with 10.

That means the Rockets received much more support around their leading scorer.

In practical basketball terms, that makes a team harder to defend.

A defense cannot simply concentrate its attention on one creator when multiple players can score efficiently.

Why the 26-Point Margin Was Not Random

Blowouts sometimes happen because of unusual shooting streaks.

This one had broader statistical support.

Houston led every quarter.

The Rockets shot better from the field.

• They shot better from three.
• They shot better from the free-throw line.
• They outrebounded Philadelphia.
• They recorded more assists.
• They had more steals.
• They had more blocks.

Both teams committed 19 turnovers, so Houston did not even need a major turnover advantage to dominate.

That consistency across multiple categories makes the final margin easier to explain.

Final Assessment

The houston rockets vs 76ers match player stats show a Houston team that won through efficiency, balance and sustained defensive pressure.

Isaiah Crawford was the headline performer with 19 points and a game-best +34 rating. Bruce Thornton delivered 18 points, four assists and two steals while shooting efficiently. Tristen Newton added 17 points and six rebounds, while Oscar Cluff helped Houston dominate the boards.

Philadelphia’s Labaron Philon Jr. was a bright spot, scoring 17 points on 7-of-11 shooting while adding four assists and two steals. Taye Fields provided six rebounds and two steals, while Dante Maddox Jr. contributed 10 points.

But the overall team numbers favored Houston too strongly.

The Rockets shot 42% compared with 31% for Philadelphia, outrebounded the Sixers 47-35, made eight three-pointers compared with five, and converted 75% of their free throws compared with 56%.

The 90-64 final score therefore reflected a sustained statistical advantage rather than a single hot stretch.

For anyone analyzing Summer League development, the most valuable lesson from this matchup is to look beyond scoring totals. Efficiency, rebounding, defensive activity, playmaking and plus-minus together provide a much more complete picture of how players influenced the game.

The final numbers make Houston’s victory straightforward to understand: the Rockets consistently produced better possessions, defended with more disruption and received contributions from multiple players. Philadelphia found individual positives, especially through Philon’s efficient scoring, but could not match Houston’s overall balance.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who was the top scorer in the Houston Rockets vs 76ers game?

Isaiah Crawford was the game’s leading scorer with 19 points for Houston. Bruce Thornton scored 18 and Tristen Newton scored 17.

How many points did Labaron Philon Jr. score?

Labaron Philon Jr. scored 17 points for Philadelphia. He also recorded four assists, two rebounds and two steals.

What was the final score between Houston and Philadelphia?

The Houston Rockets defeated the Philadelphia 76ers 90-64 in the 2026 NBA Summer League.

Which team shot better from the field?

Houston shot 42% from the field, making 30 of 72 attempts. Philadelphia shot 31%, making 23 of 74 attempts.

Who had the best plus-minus?

Isaiah Crawford had the best plus-minus in the game at +34. Bruce Thornton was next among Houston’s leading performers at +31.

Which team won the rebounding battle?

Houston won the rebounding battle 47-35, giving the Rockets a 12-rebound advantage.

Conclusion

The houston rockets vs 76ers match player stats provide a strong example of how a Summer League game can be decided through several connected statistical advantages rather than one individual performance.

Houston’s 90-64 victory was built on superior shooting efficiency, stronger rebounding, better free-throw conversion, more defensive disruption and a deeper scoring contribution from its leading players.

Isaiah Crawford stood out as the most complete performer, while Bruce Thornton and Tristen Newton gave Houston two additional reliable scoring options. Philadelphia’s Labaron Philon Jr. showed impressive individual efficiency, but the Sixers struggled to generate enough offense around him.

The final box score therefore tells a consistent story. Houston was not merely better in one category. The Rockets were more efficient and more balanced across the game, which allowed them to control the contest from the first quarter through the final buzzer.