Detroit Pistons vs 76ers Match Player Stats

The detroit pistons vs 76ers match player stats from the March 2026 meeting tell a much clearer story than the 131-109 final score alone. Detroit controlled the game from the opening quarter, shot 53.9% from the field, made 14 three-pointers, finished 21 of 22 at the free throw line, and received outstanding playmaking from Cade Cunningham. Philadelphia competed offensively at times, but its 22.9% three-point shooting and 15 turnovers made it difficult to stay within striking distance.

One important date correction is necessary before looking deeper at the numbers. The official NBA record lists this game as Thursday, March 12, 2026, rather than March 13. The final score, venue, attendance, team statistics, and player leaders supplied for the game otherwise closely match the official record. The official NBA box score and game record should be treated as the primary reference for the game.

Detroit Pistons vs 76ers match player stats: Game Overview

Detroit defeated Philadelphia 131-109 at Little Caesars Arena in Detroit. The Pistons improved to 47-18, while the 76ers fell to 35-31.

The game was not a case of Detroit winning because of one unusually productive scorer. Instead, the Pistons produced a balanced offensive performance built around efficient shooting, ball movement, transition opportunities, and strong interior play.

Philadelphia actually scored 33 points in the second quarter, showing that its offense could respond when the game opened up. The problem was that Detroit scored 36 in the first quarter and another 35 in the third. Those two periods created the separation that Philadelphia could not erase.

Final Score by Quarter

Team	Q1	Q2	Q3	Q4	Final
Philadelphia 76ers	27	33	21	28	109
Detroit Pistons	36	33	35	27	131

Detroit’s 22-point margin came from sustained efficiency rather than a single late-game run.

The most revealing part of the scoring pattern was the third quarter. Philadelphia scored only 21 points while Detroit produced 35. That 14-point difference effectively ended the competitive portion of the game.

Team Shooting Comparison

The shooting numbers provide one of the strongest explanations for Detroit’s victory.

Statistic	76ers	Pistons
Field Goals	42-90	48-89
Field Goal %	46.7%	53.9%
3-Pointers	8-35	14-35
3-Point %	22.9%	40.0%
Free Throws	17-24	21-22
Free Throw %	70.8%	95.5%
Rebounds	35	40
Assists	20	37
Turnovers	15	17
Steals	10	10
Blocks	8	7

The gap in field goal percentage was already significant, but the three-point difference made it even harder for Philadelphia to keep pace.

Detroit made 14 of 35 three-point attempts. Philadelphia made only 8 of 35. Both teams attempted exactly 35 threes, so this was not simply a matter of Detroit taking more shots from behind the arc.

Detroit converted 40% of its attempts from three-point range. Philadelphia converted only 22.9%.

That difference represents 18 additional points from three-point shooting alone.

Detroit’s Efficiency Was the Main Difference

Detroit attempted one fewer field goal than Philadelphia but made six more.

That is an important statistic because it demonstrates how efficiently the Pistons used their possessions. Philadelphia had 90 field goal attempts and converted 42. Detroit had 89 attempts and converted 48.

In simple terms, Detroit generated more scoring from nearly the same number of shot attempts.

The Pistons also went 21-for-22 at the free throw line. That 95.5% conversion rate was another source of easy points.

Philadelphia, meanwhile, went 17-for-24.

The difference was only four made free throws, but when combined with Detroit’s three-point advantage and superior field goal percentage, the margin became substantial.

Detroit Pistons Player Performance

Detroit’s offensive production was distributed across several players, which made Philadelphia’s defensive task difficult.

Duncan Robinson led the Pistons with 19 points. He was especially effective from three-point range, making 5 of 7 attempts.

Javonte Green also scored 17 points and provided an efficient scoring burst. Jalen Duren finished with 14 points and 10 rebounds, giving Detroit a double-double and a strong interior presence.

The most interesting statistical performance, however, came from Cade Cunningham.

Cade Cunningham’s Playmaking Impact

Cunningham scored only 8 points, which might appear underwhelming if points are the only statistic being examined.

That would be a mistake.

Cunningham recorded 13 assists, five rebounds, and a game-best +27 plus/minus. His role was less about scoring and more about creating advantages for teammates.

This is one of the clearest lessons from the game: a point guard does not need to lead the scoring column to control the offensive structure.

Philadelphia reportedly used aggressive trapping and double teams against Cunningham. That defensive approach limited his scoring opportunities, but it also created passing opportunities.

Cunningham repeatedly found teammates when Philadelphia committed additional defenders toward him.

His 13 assists were more than double Detroit’s next-best individual assist total. More importantly, Detroit finished with 37 team assists.

That is an extraordinary number compared with Philadelphia’s 20.

Duncan Robinson’s Shooting

Robinson’s 19 points came with particularly valuable three-point efficiency.

He made:

• 5 of 7 three-point attempts
• 5 three-pointers in total
• 19 points overall

Five made threes accounted for 15 of his 19 points.

This mattered because Philadelphia could not afford to overcommit inside while leaving a shooter like Robinson open on the perimeter.

Detroit’s spacing therefore worked in two directions. Cunningham could create opportunities through penetration and passing, while perimeter shooters punished defensive rotations.

Jalen Duren’s Interior Contribution

Jalen Duren recorded 14 points and 10 rebounds.

The rebounding figure was particularly important because Detroit finished with 40 total rebounds compared with Philadelphia’s 35.

A five-rebound team advantage may not look enormous by itself, but rebounds influence possession volume, transition opportunities, and second-chance scoring.

Duren’s presence also forced Philadelphia’s defense to account for Detroit’s interior threat.

When the defense has to protect the paint, perimeter shooters can find more space. When defenders stay closer to shooters, interior players can attack the basket.

That relationship helps explain why Detroit’s offense produced such a high field goal percentage.

Philadelphia 76ers Player Performance

Philadelphia’s best individual scorer was MarJon Beauchamp, who finished with 17 points.

Beauchamp played 30:56 and shot 7-for-13 from the field. He also made two three-pointers and one free throw.

His 17 points were the highest scoring total on the Philadelphia side.

Jabari Walker also provided an efficient scoring performance, finishing with 16 points on a perfect 6-for-6 shooting from the field. He made both of his three-point attempts and both free throws.

Cam Payne added 15 points.

These individual performances show that Philadelphia was not completely ineffective offensively. Several players shot well.

The larger problem was consistency across the team and the inability to match Detroit’s efficiency over 48 minutes.

Justin Edwards’ All-Around Numbers

Justin Edwards recorded 12 points, 9 rebounds, and 5 assists.

He led Philadelphia in rebounds and tied for the team lead in assists.

His nine rebounds were especially useful because Philadelphia needed additional possessions against a Detroit team that was shooting efficiently.

Edwards also recorded four steals, giving him an active defensive contribution.

However, his individual production was not enough to overcome the overall team efficiency gap.

The Biggest Statistical Difference: Assists

The 37-20 assist difference may be the most revealing number in the entire game.

Detroit recorded 17 more assists than Philadelphia.

That does not simply mean Detroit passed the ball more. It suggests that Detroit generated a much higher percentage of its offense through coordinated actions that resulted in assisted baskets.

A team can have a high assist total because it shoots efficiently after creating open looks. That appeared to be the case here.

Cunningham’s 13 assists were the foundation, but the overall number shows that the entire Detroit offense was moving effectively.

Philadelphia’s 20 assists were respectable, but the gap was too large given the shooting differences.

Turnovers: A Closer Look

The turnover comparison is interesting because Detroit did not actually have the advantage.

Philadelphia committed 15 turnovers.

Detroit committed 17 turnovers.

At first glance, that might suggest Philadelphia protected the ball better.

However, turnover count alone does not determine offensive success.

Detroit compensated for its two additional turnovers by shooting substantially better and generating many more assists.

The Pistons also produced 26 fast-break points compared with 18 for Philadelphia, according to the official game data.

That means Detroit converted its overall offensive advantages into points in multiple ways.

Philadelphia’s defense generated 10 steals, but Detroit’s offensive efficiency prevented those defensive plays from becoming enough to change the result.

Three-Point Shooting Decided the Margin

Three-point shooting deserves special attention because both teams attempted exactly 35 shots from beyond the arc.

That creates a very clean comparison.

Philadelphia:

8-for-35, 22.9%

Detroit:

14-for-35, 40.0%

Detroit therefore made six more three-pointers on the same number of attempts.

Because every made three is worth three points, that difference represented 18 points.

The final margin was 22 points.

This means the three-point shooting gap alone accounted for a large portion of the final difference.

Of course, basketball is not decided by one statistic. Detroit also held advantages in field goal percentage, free throw percentage, rebounding, assists, and fast-break scoring.

But the perimeter shooting gap was impossible to ignore.

Free Throw Efficiency

Detroit’s free throw shooting was another quiet advantage.

The Pistons made 21 of 22 attempts.

That is a 95.5% conversion rate.

Philadelphia made 17 of 24, or 70.8%.

Detroit therefore scored four more points from free throws despite taking only two fewer attempts.

This is a small but meaningful example of how efficiency compounds.

A team does not need to dominate every statistical category. Winning several efficiency categories by a few points can create a major overall advantage.

Rebounding Battle

Detroit won the rebounding battle 40-35.

The Pistons collected:

• 10 offensive rebounds
• 30 defensive rebounds
• 40 total rebounds

Philadelphia collected:

• 11 offensive rebounds
• 24 defensive rebounds
• 35 total rebounds

Interestingly, Philadelphia actually had one more offensive rebound.

The major difference came on the defensive glass.

Detroit grabbed six more defensive rebounds than Philadelphia.

That helped the Pistons end possessions and limit additional Philadelphia opportunities.

The five-rebound overall advantage was not overwhelming, but it supported Detroit’s broader control of the game.

Defense and Defensive Activity

Both teams recorded 10 steals, showing that defensive activity was relatively balanced in that category.

Philadelphia recorded eight blocks.

Detroit recorded seven.

So Detroit did not win because it dominated the defensive box score.

Instead, the Pistons won primarily through offensive execution.

This distinction matters when analyzing the game.

A 22-point victory can sometimes come from a team forcing turnovers and completely shutting down an opponent. That was not the central story here.

Detroit’s strongest advantage was its ability to generate efficient offense while maintaining enough defensive resistance to keep Philadelphia from matching the scoring pace.

Plus/Minus and What It Tells Us

Cade Cunningham posted the best plus/minus on Detroit at +27.

Plus/minus should never be treated as a complete measure of individual performance, but in this game it fits the broader statistical picture.

Cunningham was on the floor for a large portion of Detroit’s strongest offensive stretches and contributed 13 assists.

His scoring was limited, but his overall impact remained substantial.

On Philadelphia’s side, several players had negative plus/minus figures because Detroit consistently won its minutes across different lineup combinations.

The lesson is important for anyone studying player statistics: points alone cannot explain how a player affected a basketball game.

Why Detroit Won the Game

The victory can be reduced to several connected factors.

1. Detroit Shot Much Better

The Pistons shot 53.9% from the field.

Philadelphia shot 46.7%.

A seven-plus percentage-point difference in field goal accuracy is significant over a full NBA game.

2. Detroit Was Far Better From Three

Detroit made 40% of its threes.

Philadelphia made 22.9%.

Both teams attempted 35.

That makes the difference especially meaningful.

3. Detroit Moved the Ball

The Pistons recorded 37 assists.

Philadelphia recorded 20.

Cade Cunningham alone produced 13 assists.

4. Detroit Finished at the Free Throw Line

The Pistons converted 21 of 22 free throws.

Philadelphia converted 17 of 24.

5. Detroit Controlled the Defensive Glass

Detroit finished with 30 defensive rebounds.

Philadelphia had 24.

6. The Third Quarter Created Separation

Detroit outscored Philadelphia 35-21 in the third quarter.

That 14-point quarter became the decisive turning point.

Why Philadelphia Lost

Philadelphia’s defeat was not caused by one poor player.

It was the result of several team-level issues occurring together.

The most obvious was three-point shooting.

Going 8-for-35 from three meant Philadelphia left a substantial amount of potential scoring on the floor.

The 76ers also finished with only 20 assists, which was 17 fewer than Detroit.

Their 15 turnovers were not disastrous on their own, but when paired with poor perimeter shooting, they reduced the team’s ability to generate efficient possessions.

Philadelphia also struggled to keep Detroit from creating quality looks.

The Pistons scored 131 points despite committing 17 turnovers.

That tells us Detroit’s successful possessions were highly productive.

A Deeper Look at the Offensive Structure

The most useful way to understand this game is to think about efficiency rather than raw scoring.

Detroit did not simply shoot more.

• It shot better.
• It did not simply pass more.
• It converted ball movement into scoring opportunities.
• It did not simply get more free throws.
• It converted them at an elite rate.

And it did not rely on one player to score 30 or 40 points.

Instead, Detroit used Cunningham’s playmaking, Robinson’s perimeter shooting, Duren’s interior presence, and contributions from supporting players to build a balanced attack.

This type of offensive distribution is difficult for a defense to neutralize.

• If a defense focuses heavily on Cunningham, another player can score.
• If it closes out too aggressively on shooters, Duren can attack the interior.
• If it collapses inside, Detroit’s perimeter players have opportunities.

That interconnectedness is one reason the 37-assist total matters so much.

What the Game Says About Cade Cunningham

Cunningham’s performance is a good example of why modern basketball analysis needs more than a scoring leaderboard.

He finished with only eight points.

A casual box score review could therefore make his performance look modest.

The deeper numbers tell a different story.

He had:

• 8 points
• 5 rebounds
• 13 assists
• +27 plus/minus

His 13 assists were the most important part of his offensive contribution.

When a defense changes its coverage specifically to limit a primary creator, that adjustment can sometimes reduce the player’s scoring while increasing his passing opportunities.

That is essentially what happened here.

The defense could reduce Cunningham’s shot volume, but Detroit still had to be defended as a five-player unit.

What the Game Says About Duncan Robinson

Robinson’s performance was almost the opposite of Cunningham’s.

Cunningham influenced the game through creation.

Robinson influenced it through shot-making.

His 5-for-7 performance from three created a major spacing problem for Philadelphia.

A 71.4% three-point night on seven attempts is an extremely efficient shooting performance.

More importantly, those makes came within an offense that already had a primary creator.

This is where shooting efficiency becomes more valuable than raw scoring totals.

Robinson did not need 25 or 30 shots.

He made five threes on seven attempts and finished as Detroit’s leading scorer with 19 points.

What the Game Says About Jalen Duren

Duren’s double-double gave Detroit a reliable interior component.

His 14 points and 10 rebounds helped balance an offense that was heavily productive from the perimeter.

The Pistons did not have to choose between inside scoring and outside shooting.

That balance is important.

When teams can score effectively in multiple areas of the court, defensive schemes become more difficult to maintain for an entire game.

Philadelphia’s Bright Spots

Despite the 22-point loss, there were useful individual performances for Philadelphia.

MarJon Beauchamp led the team with 17 points.

Jabari Walker scored 16 while shooting 100% from the field.

Cam Payne contributed 15 points.

Justin Edwards added 12 points, nine rebounds, five assists, and four steals.

Those numbers demonstrate that Philadelphia had players capable of producing efficiently.

The issue was that these contributions did not combine into the same level of team-wide efficiency that Detroit achieved.

Comparing the Two Teams at a Glance

Category	Philadelphia	Detroit	Advantage
Points	109	131	Detroit
FG%	46.7%	53.9%	Detroit
3PT%	22.9%	40.0%	Detroit
FT%	70.8%	95.5%	Detroit
Rebounds	35	40	Detroit
Assists	20	37	Detroit
Turnovers	15	17	Philadelphia
Steals	10	10	Even
Blocks	8	7	Philadelphia
Fast Break Points	18	26	Detroit

The table makes the overall result easy to understand.

Philadelphia won only a few secondary categories.

Detroit won the categories most closely connected to offensive efficiency.

Season Series Context

The supplied data stated that Detroit led the season series 3-0 entering a fourth meeting.

The official NBA matchup history provides a more precise version of that sequence. Detroit defeated Philadelphia 111-108 on November 9, 2025, then won 114-105 on November 14, followed by the 131-109 victory on March 12, 2026. Detroit later completed the season sweep with a 116-93 win on April 4, 2026.

That means the final season series was 4-0 in favor of Detroit, rather than 3-0.

This correction is important because a trustworthy sports article should distinguish between supplied information and verified information.

Across those meetings, Detroit demonstrated a consistent ability to handle Philadelphia.

The March game was particularly convincing because the Pistons won by 22 points while producing strong numbers across almost every major offensive category.

Important Data Corrections

Several details in the supplied dataset need clarification.

First, the game date was listed as March 13, 2026. The official NBA record lists the game on March 12, 2026.

Second, the supplied season series ended with a listed fourth game on April 5. Official matchup information places that final meeting on April 4, 2026, with Detroit winning 116-93.

Third, the supplied team totals rounded Philadelphia’s field goal percentage to 47% and Detroit’s to 54%. The official box score gives 46.7% and 53.9%, respectively.

Fourth, the supplied starting lineups should be treated cautiously because the official box score is the stronger source for confirmed game participation and player statistics.

These corrections do not change the core conclusion of the game. Detroit won 131-109 and dominated the most important efficiency categories.

What Fans Should Look At in a Box Score

If you are checking player stats after an NBA game, do not focus only on the top scorer.

A better process is to examine the box score in this order:

1. Final score and quarter scoring
2. Field goal percentage
3. Three-point attempts and percentage
4. Free throw efficiency
5. Rebounds
6. Assists
7. Turnovers
8. Individual plus/minus
9. Minutes played
10. Shooting efficiency for key players

This approach provides a more complete picture of how the game was actually won.

For this matchup, that method quickly reveals that Duncan Robinson was the leading scorer, but Cade Cunningham was arguably the most influential playmaker.

Jalen Duren controlled the glass, while Justin Edwards was Philadelphia’s most complete statistical contributor.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who scored the most points for Detroit against Philadelphia?

Duncan Robinson led Detroit with 19 points in the 131-109 victory.

Who led the Pistons in assists?

Cade Cunningham led all Detroit players with 13 assists. He also finished with five rebounds, eight points, and a +27 plus/minus.

Who led Philadelphia in scoring?

MarJon Beauchamp was Philadelphia’s leading scorer with 17 points.

Who had the most rebounds for the 76ers?

Justin Edwards led Philadelphia with 9 rebounds. He also recorded 5 assists and 4 steals.

What was the final score between the Pistons and 76ers?

Detroit defeated Philadelphia 131-109 at Little Caesars Arena.

Why did Detroit win?

Detroit’s biggest advantages were shooting efficiency, three-point accuracy, ball movement, free throw shooting, and rebounding. The Pistons shot 53.9% overall, made 14 of 35 threes, recorded 37 assists, and went 21-for-22 at the free throw line.

Conclusion

The detroit pistons vs 76ers match player stats show that Detroit’s 131-109 victory was built on team efficiency rather than one individual scoring explosion.

Duncan Robinson led the Pistons with 19 points and knocked down five three-pointers. Jalen Duren supplied a double-double with 14 points and 10 rebounds. Cade Cunningham had only eight points, but his 13 assists and +27 plus/minus demonstrated how strongly he influenced the game as a creator.

For Philadelphia, MarJon Beauchamp led the team with 17 points, while Justin Edwards produced a balanced line of 12 points, nine rebounds, five assists, and four steals. Jabari Walker and Cam Payne also provided useful scoring contributions.

The decisive difference was the way those individual performances connected at team level.

Detroit shot 53.9% compared with Philadelphia’s 46.7%. The Pistons made 14 three-pointers compared with eight for the 76ers. Detroit produced 37 assists compared with 20. The Pistons also shot 95.5% from the free throw line and controlled the defensive glass.

The third quarter ultimately turned the game into a comfortable Detroit victory. After Philadelphia scored 33 points in the second period, Detroit responded with 35 points in the third while limiting the 76ers to 21.

That combination of shooting, playmaking, rebounding, and sustained execution explains the final margin far better than the scoring totals alone.

For readers analyzing NBA games, this matchup is also a useful reminder that the most valuable player performance is not always the one with the highest point total. Cunningham’s 13 assists, Robinson’s perimeter efficiency, and Duren’s rebounding all played different roles in the same offensive system.

The official game record should remain the final reference point for exact box score figures, game date, and season-series information.