Chargers vs Miami Dolphins Match Player Stats

The chargers vs miami dolphins match player stats from October 12, 2025, tell the story of a close game that changed direction several times before the Los Angeles Chargers escaped Miami with a 29-27 victory. Justin Herbert completed 29 of 38 passes for 264 yards and two touchdowns without throwing an interception, while Kimani Vidal produced 124 rushing yards on only 18 carries. On the Miami side, De’Von Achane delivered 128 rushing yards and two touchdowns, while Jaylen Waddle finished with 95 receiving yards. The biggest statistical difference, however, came from turnovers, as the Chargers intercepted Tua Tagovailoa three times.

The game was much more competitive than the final two-point margin suggests. Miami scored 14 points in the fourth quarter after being held scoreless in the third, turning a 26-13 deficit into a 27-26 lead with less than a minute remaining. Los Angeles then produced one final scoring drive, allowing Cameron Dicker to kick the decisive field goal.

The NFL’s official player log also confirms Herbert’s 29-for-38 performance, 264 passing yards, two touchdowns, zero interceptions and a 112.2 passer rating in the Week 6 matchup.

Table of Contents

Chargers vs Miami Dolphins Match Player Stats at a Glance

The final score was Los Angeles Chargers 29, Miami Dolphins 27.

Category	Los Angeles Chargers	Miami Dolphins
Final Score	29	27
Record After Game	4-2	1-5
First Quarter	6	7
Second Quarter	3	6
Third Quarter	14	0
Fourth Quarter	6	14
Passing Yards	264	213 total
Team Rushing Yards	140	137
Rushing Attempts	25	21
Rushing Average	5.6	6.5
Receiving Yards	264	213
Receptions	29	22
Interceptions	3	0
Sacks	1	2
Field Goals	5/5	2/3

The basic numbers show why this game was so difficult to evaluate from the final score alone. Miami actually averaged more yards per rushing attempt and had a strong performance from Achane, while the Chargers generated the more decisive passing and turnover numbers.

Final Score Breakdown

The scoring pattern provides an important piece of context.

Los Angeles scored six points in the opening quarter, followed by three in the second. Miami led 13-9 at halftime despite the Chargers moving the ball effectively enough to stay close.

The third quarter changed the game.

Los Angeles scored 14 unanswered points while Miami failed to score. That pushed the Chargers ahead 23-13 and put Miami in a difficult position entering the final period.

Then the Dolphins produced their strongest offensive stretch of the afternoon.

Miami scored 14 fourth-quarter points and eventually moved ahead 27-26. According to the NFL’s game account, the Dolphins had erased a 13-point fourth-quarter deficit before Herbert led the final Chargers possession.

The Chargers did not need a touchdown to win. They needed enough yardage to put Dicker in position for a field goal.

That distinction is important when studying the player statistics. Herbert’s numbers were not built around an enormous passing total. Instead, his value came from efficiency, ball security and execution during the final possession.

Justin Herbert’s Passing Performance

Justin Herbert was the most important statistical player for Los Angeles.

His final passing line:

29 completions
38 attempts
264 passing yards
2 touchdowns
0 interceptions
112.2 passer rating
76.3 percent completion rate
6.9 yards per attempt

A 29-for-38 performance means Herbert completed more than three quarters of his passes. He also avoided the turnover that could have changed the outcome of a game decided by two points.

His 264 yards were not an extraordinary volume number by modern NFL standards, but the efficiency was meaningful. He completed 76.3 percent of his attempts while throwing two touchdowns and no interceptions.

That combination matters.

A quarterback can throw for 300 or more yards and still produce a less effective game if those yards come with multiple turnovers, sacks or stalled possessions. Herbert’s performance was more controlled.

ESPN’s box score lists Herbert at 29/38 for 264 yards, two touchdowns and zero interceptions with a 112.2 passer rating.

Herbert’s Completion Rate

Herbert completed 29 of 38 passes.

That produces a completion percentage of approximately 76.3 percent.

The number is particularly useful because it shows that Los Angeles was not relying solely on explosive plays. The Chargers consistently completed passes and maintained enough offensive efficiency to create scoring opportunities.

The final possession was the clearest example.

With Miami ahead 27-26, Herbert needed to move the ball without giving Miami another opportunity. He faced pressure but remained composed enough to keep the possession alive.

NFL’s account of the game highlights Herbert avoiding pressure before finding Ladd McConkey on a major late play.

Tua Tagovailoa’s Passing Numbers

Tua Tagovailoa finished with:

21 completions
32 attempts
205 passing yards
1 touchdown
3 interceptions
54.8 passer rating
65.6 percent completion rate

The completion percentage itself was respectable. The three interceptions were the much more important statistic.

Miami did many things well offensively. The Dolphins rushed for 137 yards and scored twice on the ground. Waddle produced 95 receiving yards. Achane averaged 8.0 yards per carry.

But the three interceptions created a major disadvantage.

Turnovers are especially important in a close game because they can erase otherwise productive offensive possessions. Miami’s ability to move the football was repeatedly undermined by losing possession through interceptions.

The statistical contrast between the two quarterbacks is therefore straightforward:

Herbert: 2 TD, 0 INT

Tagovailoa: 1 TD, 3 INT

That five-interception difference in combined turnover production was one of the clearest statistical separators in the matchup.

Kimani Vidal’s Breakout Rushing Performance

Kimani Vidal was one of the most important contributors in the game.

His rushing line:

18 carries
124 yards
6.9 yards per carry
38-yard long
0 rushing touchdowns

Vidal’s 124 yards accounted for a huge portion of Los Angeles’ 140 team rushing yards.

He averaged 6.9 yards per carry, which means the Chargers were able to generate significant production without giving him an unusually high workload.

This is one of the more interesting details in the box score.

Los Angeles had only 25 rushing attempts but gained 140 yards. Vidal carried the ball 18 times and generated 124 yards by himself.

That means Vidal accounted for approximately 88.6 percent of the Chargers’ rushing yardage.

The NFL’s Week 6 analysis specifically noted that Vidal spearheaded the Chargers’ injured backfield and produced 124 yards on 18 carries.

Why Vidal’s Performance Mattered

The value of Vidal’s performance went beyond his raw yardage.

A productive running game can help an offense in three important ways:

It reduces the need for constant dropbacks.
It creates manageable down-and-distance situations.
It can slow the opposing pass rush by forcing defenders to respect the run.

That third factor was particularly relevant because the Chargers were dealing with pressure from Miami’s defense.

Vidal’s ability to consistently gain positive yardage helped Los Angeles maintain offensive balance.

De’Von Achane’s 128-Rushing-Yard Game

De’Von Achane was Miami’s most explosive ball carrier.

He finished with:

16 carries
128 yards
8.0 yards per carry
2 touchdowns
49-yard long

Achane’s 49-yard touchdown run immediately demonstrated the type of explosive threat he represented.

His 128 rushing yards were actually four more than Vidal’s 124, despite Achane receiving two fewer carries.

The efficiency comparison is notable:

Achane: 8.0 yards per carry

Vidal: 6.9 yards per carry

Miami therefore had one of the game’s most productive individual rushing performances.

Achane also scored both of Miami’s rushing touchdowns, giving him a major role in the Dolphins’ offensive production.

Achane vs Vidal

Comparing the two leading rushers provides one of the most interesting statistical matchups of the game.

Statistic	Kimani Vidal	De’Von Achane
Carries	18	16
Rushing Yards	124	128
Average	6.9	8.0
Longest Run	38	49
Rushing TDs	0	2

Achane had the higher average and more touchdowns, while Vidal had slightly more carries.

Neither performance can be dismissed based solely on the final result. Both backs were highly productive.

The difference was how the rest of the teams converted those offensive opportunities.

Ladd McConkey Leads Chargers Receivers

Ladd McConkey was the Chargers’ leading receiver.

His final line:

7 receptions
100 receiving yards
1 touchdown
42-yard long
9 targets

McConkey was the only Chargers receiver to reach 100 yards.

He also provided one of the most important late-game plays.

With Miami having taken a one-point lead, Herbert found McConkey on a critical completion that produced a 42-yard gain. NFL’s Week 6 analysis identifies the play as a major part of the final winning sequence.

This is a good example of why player statistics should be read together with game context.

McConkey’s 100 yards were valuable, but his biggest contribution was the timing of the 42-yard play.

A 42-yard gain late in a one-score game can be more consequential than several routine catches earlier in the afternoon.

Jaylen Waddle’s Receiving Production

Jaylen Waddle led Miami’s receiving group.

His numbers:

6 receptions
95 yards
0 touchdowns
45-yard long
8 targets

Waddle averaged 15.8 yards per reception.

That was a strong efficiency figure, especially considering Miami’s passing offense produced only 205 passing yards from Tagovailoa.

Waddle also completed a trick-play passing attempt.

He went 1-for-1 for 8 yards with a 100.0 passer rating on that throw.

That play appears separately in the passing statistics, while his primary role remained that of Miami’s leading receiver.

Waddle vs McConkey

The comparison between the two leading wide receivers was close.

Statistic	Ladd McConkey	Jaylen Waddle
Receptions	7	6
Receiving Yards	100	95
Touchdowns	1	0
Long Reception	42	45
Targets	9	8
Yards Per Reception	14.3	15.8

Waddle was slightly more explosive on a per-catch basis.

McConkey had more receptions, more total yards and a touchdown.

Most importantly, McConkey delivered a decisive late-game contribution.

Team Passing and Receiving Comparison

The passing statistics show a relatively clear difference between the offenses.

Los Angeles recorded:

264 passing yards
29 completions
2 passing touchdowns
0 interceptions

Miami recorded:

213 total passing yards
22 completions
1 passing touchdown
3 interceptions

The Chargers therefore had a 51-yard advantage in passing yardage.

More importantly, Los Angeles did not turn the ball over through the air.

Miami’s three interceptions created extra opportunities for the Chargers and reduced the Dolphins’ margin for error.

Team Rushing Comparison

The rushing numbers were surprisingly close.

Los Angeles:

25 attempts
140 yards
5.6 yards per carry
0 touchdowns

Miami:

21 attempts
137 yards
6.5 yards per carry
2 touchdowns

Miami actually averaged 0.9 more yards per rushing attempt.

The Chargers, however, produced three more rushing attempts and three more total rushing yards.

The biggest difference was scoring.

Miami turned its rushing success into two touchdowns through Achane.

Los Angeles moved the ball efficiently on the ground but did not score a rushing touchdown.

The Turnover Battle

The turnover statistics are arguably the most important part of the entire game.

Los Angeles recorded three interceptions.

They came from:

Derwin James Jr.: 1 interception for 21 yards
Tony Jefferson: 1 interception for 2 yards
Benjamin St-Juste: 1 interception

Miami recorded no interceptions.

The Chargers also lost one fumble.

Miami lost none.

That produces a net turnover picture of:

Chargers: 3 interceptions gained, 1 fumble lost

Dolphins: 0 interceptions gained, 0 fumbles lost

The Chargers therefore had a net positive turnover margin.

That helped offset the fact that Miami’s rushing attack was extremely efficient.

Why the Interceptions Were So Important

Miami’s offense did not fail to generate yardage.

The Dolphins produced 350 total offensive yards according to the supplied passing and rushing totals.

The problem was converting possession into consistently clean drives.

Three interceptions interrupted Miami’s offensive rhythm and gave Los Angeles additional opportunities.

In a game decided by two points, that kind of mistake margin becomes critical.

Chargers Defensive Player Stats

The Chargers recorded:

62 total tackles
38 solo tackles
2 sacks
4 tackles for loss
5 passes defended
4 quarterback hits
3 interceptions

The defensive statistics reveal a unit that did not completely shut down Miami’s offense.

Achane averaged 8.0 yards per carry, and Miami finished with 137 rushing yards.

Yet Los Angeles created enough disruption through turnovers to change the game’s direction.

Derwin James Jr., Tony Jefferson and Benjamin St-Juste each intercepted Tagovailoa.

Those plays were more significant than the relatively modest sack total.

This is an important lesson when reading defensive statistics. Sacks are easy to notice, but interceptions can have a much larger immediate impact on field position and possession.

Dolphins Defensive Player Stats

Miami recorded:

73 total tackles
48 solo tackles
1 sack
1 tackle for loss
2 passes defended
7 quarterback hits

The Dolphins actually recorded more total tackles than the Chargers.

They also produced seven quarterback hits compared with four for Los Angeles.

Yet Miami finished without an interception.

That contrast helps explain how a defense can show strong activity in several categories and still give up enough opportunities to lose a close game.

The Chargers were pressured, but Herbert avoided turning those pressures into turnovers.

Cameron Dicker’s Perfect Kicking Performance

Cameron Dicker was perfect on field goals.

His kicking line:

5 field goals made
5 attempts
100 percent
35-yard longest field goal
2 extra points
17 total points

Dicker scored 17 of Los Angeles’ 29 points.

That is approximately 58.6 percent of the Chargers’ total score.

His five successful field goals were a major reason Los Angeles could win despite scoring only two touchdowns.

This also highlights the importance of red-zone efficiency.

The Chargers scored only two touchdowns but still reached 29 points because they consistently converted scoring opportunities into field goals.

NFL’s Week 6 analysis noted that Los Angeles had struggled in the red zone, going 2-for-7, yet still had enough offensive and kicking production to win.

Riley Patterson’s Kicking Numbers

Miami’s Riley Patterson finished with:

2 field goals made
3 attempts
66.7 percent
47-yard long
3 extra points
9 total points

Patterson converted his two successful field goals but missed one attempt.

The nine points he produced were useful, but Dicker’s perfect five-for-five performance created a substantial special teams difference.

The Chargers gained eight more points from their kicker than Miami did.

In a two-point game, that difference deserves attention.

Punter Comparison

Los Angeles punter JK Scott recorded:

2 punts
94 total yards
47.0-yard average
55-yard long

Miami punter Jake Bailey recorded:

2 punts
111 total yards
55.5-yard average
57-yard long

Bailey had the stronger raw punting average.

His 55.5-yard average was 8.5 yards higher than Scott’s 47.0-yard average.

However, punting statistics alone do not determine field-position impact because return yardage, coverage and where each punt was downed also matter.

Kick Return and Punt Return Statistics

The Chargers recorded:

4 kick returns
131 return yards
32.8-yard average
40-yard long
2 punt returns
11 punt return yards

The Dolphins recorded:

6 kick returns
180 return yards
30.0-yard average
45-yard long
1 punt return
8 punt return yards

Miami had more kick return yards because it had six returns compared with four for Los Angeles.

Los Angeles, however, had the higher average per kick return.

These numbers did not dominate the final result, but they contributed to the field-position battle.

How the Game Changed Quarter by Quarter

First Quarter

Miami took an early 7-3 lead after Achane broke loose for a 49-yard touchdown run.

The Chargers answered with field goals.

Los Angeles finished the quarter with six points, while Miami had seven.

Second Quarter

The Chargers added another field goal.

Miami added six points and entered halftime ahead 13-9.

At this stage, the game remained highly competitive.

Third Quarter

The Chargers took control.

Los Angeles scored 14 points while Miami was shut out.

That created a 23-13 advantage and represented the largest meaningful swing of the game.

Fourth Quarter

Miami responded with 14 points.

The Dolphins eventually moved ahead 27-26.

Then the Chargers produced the final possession.

Herbert made several important plays under pressure, and McConkey produced the crucial 42-yard reception that helped set up Dicker’s winning field goal.

What the Player Stats Reveal About the Game

The most useful way to interpret this box score is to look beyond individual totals.

1. Miami’s Running Game Was Excellent

Achane averaged 8.0 yards per carry and scored twice.

Miami’s entire rushing attack averaged 6.5 yards per attempt.

That was one of the Dolphins’ strongest statistical areas.

2. Los Angeles Had the More Efficient Passing Performance

Herbert completed 76.3 percent of his passes and threw two touchdowns without an interception.

Tagovailoa completed 65.6 percent and threw three interceptions.

That difference heavily influenced the game.

3. The Chargers Got More From Their Kicker

Dicker made all five field-goal attempts.

Patterson made two of three.

The eight-point difference between the kickers was significant in a two-point game.

4. McConkey Made the Biggest Late Receiving Play

McConkey finished with 100 yards and a touchdown, but the late 42-yard reception was particularly important because it immediately changed the Chargers’ field-position situation.

5. Defensive Turnovers Offset Miami’s Offensive Efficiency

Miami generated productive rushing numbers and 213 passing yards.

But three interceptions prevented the Dolphins from turning enough of those offensive opportunities into points.

Advanced Interpretation of the Box Score

The game provides a useful example of why football statistics should be analyzed in groups rather than individually.

Suppose someone looked only at rushing efficiency.

Miami would have a strong argument statistically.

Suppose someone looked only at defensive tackles.

Miami recorded 73 compared with 62 for Los Angeles.

Suppose someone looked only at quarterback hits.

Miami had seven compared with four.

Yet Los Angeles won.

Why?

Because the Chargers were more effective in several high-impact areas.

They:

Protected the football through the passing game.
Intercepted Tagovailoa three times.
Got 124 rushing yards from Vidal.
Received 100 yards and a touchdown from McConkey.
Made all five field-goal attempts.
Produced enough late-game execution to regain the lead.

This is why the chargers vs miami dolphins match player stats should not be reduced to a single leaderboard.

The game was decided by how several statistical categories interacted.

Chargers Offensive Takeaways

Los Angeles can take several positive points from the offensive statistics.

Passing Efficiency

Herbert completed 29 of 38 attempts and avoided interceptions.

Rushing Efficiency

Vidal averaged 6.9 yards per carry.

Receiving Production

McConkey reached 100 yards and scored once.

Field Goal Reliability

Dicker converted every field-goal attempt.

Late-Game Execution

The Chargers regained the lead after surrendering a 13-point fourth-quarter advantage.

The last point is particularly important because a strong statistical performance can still disappear if the offense fails in the final possession.

Los Angeles avoided that outcome.

Dolphins Offensive Takeaways

Miami’s offensive statistics also contain several positive indicators.

Achane Was Highly Efficient

His 128 rushing yards came on only 16 carries.

Waddle Was Productive

Waddle generated 95 receiving yards and averaged 15.8 yards per reception.

Fourth-Quarter Offense Was Excellent

Miami scored 14 points in the final period after being shut out in the third.

Rushing Production Was Strong

The Dolphins averaged 6.5 yards per rushing attempt.

The major problem was turnover production.

Three interceptions put too much pressure on an offense that otherwise moved the ball effectively.

Most Important Individual Performances

Here is a concise ranking-free summary of the major statistical performances.

Justin Herbert: 29/38, 264 yards, 2 TD, 0 INT, 112.2 rating

Kimani Vidal: 18 carries, 124 yards, 6.9 average

Ladd McConkey: 7 receptions, 100 yards, 1 TD

Cameron Dicker: 5/5 field goals, 17 points

De’Von Achane: 16 carries, 128 yards, 2 TD, 8.0 average

Jaylen Waddle: 6 receptions, 95 yards, 15.8 average

Tua Tagovailoa: 21/32, 205 yards, 1 TD, 3 INT, 54.8 rating

Derwin James Jr.: 1 interception, 21 return yards

Tony Jefferson: 1 interception, 2 return yards

Benjamin St-Juste: 1 interception

Chargers vs Miami Dolphins Match Player Stats and Fantasy Football Context

For fantasy football purposes, the box score has several useful lessons.

Herbert’s two passing touchdowns and 264 yards gave him a productive passing performance, while Vidal’s 124 rushing yards represented a significant workload opportunity.

Achane was highly productive on the ground and scored twice, making his rushing efficiency especially important.

McConkey’s seven catches, 100 yards and touchdown also stand out.

Waddle’s 95 receiving yards were valuable even without a touchdown.

However, fantasy football scoring varies by league settings. Reception bonuses, touchdown scoring, rushing bonuses and passing scoring rules can change the relative fantasy value of these performances.

For that reason, the raw box score should be treated as the starting point rather than the final fantasy conclusion.

What to Look for When Comparing NFL Player Stats

When analyzing a game like this, readers can use a simple process.

Start With Quarterback Efficiency

Look at:

Completion percentage
Passing yards
Touchdowns
Interceptions
Sacks
Passer rating

Do not evaluate a quarterback using yardage alone.

Move to Rushing Efficiency

Check:

Attempts
Yards
Average
Longest run
Touchdowns

The average helps explain whether the runner was consistently productive or depended on one explosive play.

Review Receiving Volume

Targets can show involvement that receptions alone do not reveal.

For example, McConkey received nine targets and caught seven passes.

Waddle received eight targets and caught six.

Examine Turnovers

Interceptions and fumbles often have greater immediate importance than small differences in total yardage.

Finish With Special Teams

Field goals can decide close games.

The difference between Dicker’s five-for-five performance and Patterson’s two-for-three performance was meaningful here.

Why the Final Score Does Not Tell the Whole Story

A 29-27 final score tells us that the Chargers won by two points.

It does not tell us:

Miami led early.
Los Angeles dominated the third quarter.
Miami produced a fourth-quarter comeback.
Tagovailoa threw three interceptions.
Achane averaged eight yards per carry.
Vidal rushed for 124 yards.
McConkey produced 100 receiving yards.
Dicker scored 17 points.
Herbert completed more than 76 percent of his passes.

That is why player statistics are valuable.

They provide the details behind the result.

The game was not simply a case of one team dominating the other. It was a contest in which Miami produced several impressive offensive numbers while Los Angeles won important possession, passing and kicking battles.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the final score between the Chargers and Dolphins?

The Los Angeles Chargers defeated the Miami Dolphins 29-27 on October 12, 2025.

How many passing yards did Justin Herbert have?

Justin Herbert completed 29 of 38 passes for 264 yards, two touchdowns and zero interceptions.

How many rushing yards did De’Von Achane have?

De’Von Achane rushed 16 times for 128 yards and two touchdowns, averaging 8.0 yards per carry.

How many rushing yards did Kimani Vidal have?

Kimani Vidal carried the ball 18 times for 124 yards, averaging 6.9 yards per carry.

Who led the Chargers in receiving?

Ladd McConkey led Los Angeles with seven receptions for 100 yards and one touchdown.

Who led the Dolphins in receiving?

Jaylen Waddle led Miami with six receptions for 95 yards and no touchdowns.

Conclusion

The chargers vs miami dolphins match player stats from October 12, 2025, show a game defined by contrasting strengths.

Los Angeles received an efficient performance from Justin Herbert, a powerful rushing contribution from Kimani Vidal, 100 receiving yards from Ladd McConkey and a perfect five-for-five field-goal performance from Cameron Dicker.

Miami produced excellent rushing efficiency through De’Von Achane, strong receiving production from Jaylen Waddle and a dramatic fourth-quarter offensive comeback.

The biggest statistical difference was turnover creation. The Chargers intercepted Tua Tagovailoa three times while Herbert threw no interceptions. That margin helped Los Angeles survive Miami’s 14-point fourth quarter and ultimately win 29-27.

The box score also shows why football analysis requires more than looking at total yardage. Miami averaged more yards per rush and recorded more tackles and quarterback hits, yet Los Angeles converted its opportunities more effectively in several high-impact areas.

For anyone studying this game, the most useful numbers to remember are Herbert’s 264 passing yards and two touchdowns, Vidal’s 124 rushing yards, McConkey’s 100 receiving yards, Achane’s 128 rushing yards and two touchdowns, Waddle’s 95 receiving yards, the Chargers’ three interceptions and Dicker’s 17 points.

Together, those numbers explain much more about the game than the final 29-27 score alone.