Timberwolves vs Memphis Grizzlies Match Player Stats

The timberwolves vs memphis grizzlies match player stats from the March 2026 meeting tell a much deeper story than the final score alone. Minnesota defeated Memphis 117-110 at Target Center, but the game featured several momentum swings, a strong first-half showing from Memphis, a major rebounding advantage for Minnesota, and a remarkable scoring performance from Anthony Edwards. The Timberwolves entered the matchup with a 39-23 record and a 21-11 home mark, while the Grizzlies came in at 23-37 and 11-20 on the road.

The most important individual number was Edwards’ 41 points. He shot 15 of 29 from the field, made 7 of 13 three-point attempts, and converted all four of his free throws. Julius Randle added 23 points and 11 rebounds, while Jaden McDaniels scored 16. For Memphis, Jaylen Wells led the team with 19 points, while GG Jackson controlled the glass with 11 rebounds.

The result was also significant because it showed how different statistical strengths can shape the same game. Memphis shot the ball well from three-point range, finishing 15 of 38 for 39%. Minnesota, meanwhile, shot only 10 of 34 from beyond the arc but dominated the rebounding battle and received an outstanding individual scoring display from Edwards.

Timberwolves vs Memphis Grizzlies Match Player Stats: Game Overview

The matchup took place at Target Center in Minneapolis, with an announced attendance of 17,416. The official NBA record lists the game as a March 3, 2026 matchup, with the game information extending into March 4 because of the scheduled time. The final score was Minnesota 117, Memphis 110.

Minnesota did not control the game from the opening tip. Memphis scored 32 points in the first quarter compared with Minnesota’s 23, giving the Grizzlies a nine-point advantage after 12 minutes.

The second quarter changed the shape of the contest. Minnesota scored 34 points while Memphis managed 30, cutting the deficit and sending the game into halftime with Memphis still ahead.

The third quarter was the decisive stretch.

Minnesota produced 32 points while Memphis scored only 20. That 12-point difference completely changed the scoreboard and gave the Timberwolves the platform they needed to protect the lead during the final period.

Both teams scored 28 points in the fourth quarter, so Minnesota’s third-quarter surge ultimately became the difference.

Final Score by Quarter

Team	Q1	Q2	Q3	Q4	Final
Memphis Grizzlies	32	30	20	28	110
Minnesota Timberwolves	23	34	32	28	117

The official NBA game record confirms the 117-110 final score and the quarter-by-quarter breakdown.

Anthony Edwards Leads Minnesota With 41 Points

Anthony Edwards was the central offensive figure of the matchup.

He finished with 41 points on 15-of-29 shooting from the field. He also made 7 of 13 three-point attempts and went 4 for 4 at the free-throw line.

That combination is particularly important because Edwards did not depend on one scoring method. He generated points through perimeter shooting, mid-range attempts, drives, and free throws.

His 7 made three-pointers represented a major part of Minnesota’s offensive production. At 53.8% from three-point range, Edwards was significantly more efficient from deep than the Timberwolves were as a team.

His 15 field goals also show how much offensive responsibility he carried. Minnesota scored 117 points, meaning Edwards personally supplied more than one-third of the team’s total.

Edwards’ Key Numbers

Statistic	Anthony Edwards
Points	41
Field Goals	15-29
Field Goal Percentage	51.7%
Three-Pointers	7-13
Three-Point Percentage	53.8%
Free Throws	4-4
Free Throw Percentage	100%

The official NBA record also identifies Edwards’ 41-point performance as the headline individual performance of the game.

What makes the performance especially notable is the timing of his scoring. Minnesota struggled from outside during the early stages, yet Edwards remained involved and eventually became increasingly important as the game moved into the second half.

Julius Randle Provides a Second Scoring Option

Julius Randle finished with 23 points and 11 rebounds.

That production gave Minnesota an important interior and secondary scoring presence. Edwards attracted significant attention as the primary offensive threat, while Randle’s ability to contribute both scoring and rebounding helped prevent the Timberwolves from becoming overly dependent on perimeter offense.

A double-double of 23 points and 11 rebounds is particularly valuable in a game where Minnesota’s biggest statistical advantage came on the glass.

Randle’s contribution can therefore be viewed in two ways.

First, he supplied reliable scoring behind Edwards.

Second, his rebounding helped Minnesota maintain possessions and limit Memphis’ opportunities to generate second-chance points.

The combination of Edwards’ perimeter scoring and Randle’s inside production created a balanced offensive structure.

Jaden McDaniels Adds 16 Points

Jaden McDaniels scored 16 points and grabbed seven rebounds.

His offensive output was not as large as Edwards’ or Randle’s, but his seven rebounds added to Minnesota’s overall control of the glass.

This is an important detail when examining a box score. A player does not need to lead a team in scoring to have a meaningful statistical impact.

McDaniels’ 16 points gave Minnesota another double-digit scorer, while his seven rebounds strengthened an area in which the Timberwolves already held a substantial advantage.

Rudy Gobert Controls the Rebounding Battle

Rudy Gobert recorded 12 rebounds along with five points.

The scoring total was modest, but the rebounding contribution was important. Minnesota finished with 52 team rebounds compared with 33 for Memphis.

That is a 19-rebound difference.

A gap of that size can influence nearly every part of a game. More rebounds can lead to additional possessions, fewer second opportunities for the opponent, and greater control of the game’s pace.

Gobert’s 12 rebounds were therefore one of the clearest individual indicators of Minnesota’s physical advantage.

The official NBA recap also highlighted Minnesota’s large rebounding advantage over Memphis.

Donte DiVincenzo’s Playmaking Impact

Donte DiVincenzo scored seven points, collected four rebounds, and recorded six assists.

The six assists were the key part of his statistical contribution.

Minnesota did not have an overwhelming team assist total, finishing with 19, but DiVincenzo was responsible for a meaningful portion of those successful scoring connections.

His role illustrates why looking only at points can produce an incomplete picture of player performance.

A seven-point night may appear quiet at first glance, but six assists indicate that DiVincenzo was actively involved in creating opportunities for teammates.

Naz Reid Contributes 14 Points

Naz Reid added 14 points and four assists in the supplied game data.

His scoring gave Minnesota another reliable offensive option beyond its primary scorers.

The value of a supporting scorer becomes more obvious when the opposing team focuses attention on a high-volume scorer such as Edwards. When other players can convert opportunities, defensive pressure cannot be concentrated on one player for the entire game.

Reid’s contribution therefore complemented the larger offensive structure.

Memphis Grizzlies Player Stats

Memphis did not lack offensive production.

The Grizzlies scored 110 points and shot 46% from the field. They also made 15 three-pointers on 38 attempts, producing a 39% three-point percentage.

Jaylen Wells led Memphis with 19 points.

GG Jackson was the team’s leading rebounder with 11 boards, while Scotty Pippen Jr. led the team in assists with five.

Memphis’ Main Statistical Leaders

Category	Player	Stat
Leading Scorer	Jaylen Wells	19 points
Leading Rebounder	GG Jackson	11 rebounds
Leading Assister	Scotty Pippen Jr.	5 assists

Wells was particularly effective as a scoring option. His 19 points made him Memphis’ highest-scoring player, and his perimeter shooting helped Memphis maintain offensive pressure.

GG Jackson’s 11 rebounds were also important because Memphis needed to compete against a much larger rebounding output from Minnesota.

Scotty Pippen Jr.’s five assists represented Memphis’ best individual playmaking total in the supplied statistics.

Jaylen Wells Leads Memphis Scoring

Jaylen Wells finished with 19 points and was Memphis’ top scorer.

His contribution was especially important during the first half, when the Grizzlies built a lead.

Memphis scored 62 points before halftime, and its early offensive rhythm allowed the team to establish control despite ultimately losing the game.

Wells’ ability to score from outside also helped Memphis maintain a strong three-point percentage.

However, scoring efficiency from deep was not enough to overcome Minnesota’s advantages in other statistical categories.

GG Jackson’s 11 Rebounds Matter

GG Jackson recorded 11 rebounds, making him Memphis’ top rebounder.

That number becomes more significant when placed next to the team’s overall rebounding total of 33.

Jackson therefore accounted for a substantial portion of Memphis’ work on the glass.

The challenge for Memphis was that one strong rebounding performance could not fully offset Minnesota’s collective dominance. The Timberwolves finished with 52 rebounds, meaning Minnesota controlled the overall rebounding battle even though Jackson individually produced a strong number.

Scotty Pippen Jr. Provides Five Assists

Scotty Pippen Jr. recorded five assists, the highest assist total for Memphis in the supplied statistics.

For a team that scored 110 points, efficient ball movement was necessary to maintain offensive production.

Memphis finished with 27 assists, compared with 19 for Minnesota.

That difference is one of the more interesting elements of the game because Minnesota won despite Memphis having the higher team assist total.

This demonstrates that assist volume alone does not determine the outcome. Shot quality, offensive rebounds, turnovers, defensive stops, and individual shot-making can all alter the relationship between passing and winning.

Team Shooting Comparison

Shooting efficiency provides another useful way to understand the game.

Minnesota made 40 of 84 field-goal attempts, finishing at 48%.

Memphis made 36 of 79 attempts, finishing at 46%.

The Timberwolves therefore held a two-percentage-point advantage in overall field-goal accuracy.

Shooting Comparison

Category	Memphis	Minnesota
Field Goals	36-79	40-84
Field Goal %	46%	48%
Three-Pointers	15-38	10-34
Three-Point %	39%	29%
Free Throws	23-29	27-34
Free Throw %	79%	79%

The three-point numbers tell a different story.

Memphis was considerably more efficient from beyond the arc, making 39% of its attempts compared with Minnesota’s 29%.

This is one of the clearest examples of why a game cannot be explained by a single shooting statistic.

Memphis won the three-point efficiency battle, but Minnesota won the game.

The Timberwolves compensated through stronger overall field-goal production, free throws, rebounding, and individual scoring from Edwards.

The Rebounding Difference Was One of the Biggest Factors

Minnesota recorded 52 rebounds while Memphis finished with 33.

The 19-rebound advantage is difficult to overlook.

Rebounding does more than add a number to a box score. Offensive rebounds can create extra scoring chances, while defensive rebounds end opposing possessions.

Minnesota’s advantage therefore helped create a statistical cushion in areas that Memphis’ three-point shooting could not fully erase.

Rudy Gobert’s 12 rebounds and Julius Randle’s 11 were particularly important contributions.

GG Jackson’s 11 rebounds gave Memphis a strong individual effort, but Minnesota received significant rebounding contributions from multiple players.

Turnovers and Possession Management

Minnesota committed 16 turnovers, while Memphis had 17.

The difference was only one turnover.

This means turnovers did not create the same kind of separation as rebounds.

Both teams gave away possessions, but Memphis ended with one additional turnover.

When combined with the rebounding numbers, the possession picture becomes more interesting. Minnesota lost fewer possessions through turnovers while also collecting substantially more rebounds.

That combination helped the Timberwolves create more opportunities despite Memphis’ better three-point shooting.

Assists Tell an Interesting Story

Memphis recorded 27 assists compared with Minnesota’s 19.

At first glance, this could suggest that Memphis moved the ball more effectively.

That is true in terms of raw assist volume, but the final result shows that passing volume alone was not decisive.

Minnesota received an exceptional individual scoring performance from Edwards, who could create offense without needing every scoring possession to come through an assist.

The Timberwolves also benefited from strong individual scoring contributions from Randle, McDaniels, and Reid.

This is an important lesson when interpreting basketball statistics: team assists should be viewed alongside shooting, turnovers, rebounds, and individual shot creation rather than treated as a standalone measure.

Free-Throw Shooting Was Nearly Identical

Both teams finished at 79% from the free-throw line.

Memphis made 23 of 29 attempts, while Minnesota made 27 of 34.

Because both teams had almost identical free-throw efficiency, the difference came primarily from volume.

Minnesota attempted five more free throws and made four more.

Those additional successful free throws contributed to the seven-point final margin.

This is a relatively small statistical edge compared with the rebounding difference, but close games are often shaped by several smaller advantages working together.

How the Third Quarter Changed the Game

The third quarter was the turning point.

Memphis scored only 20 points, while Minnesota scored 32.

That 12-point swing erased the Grizzlies’ halftime advantage and gave Minnesota control.

The official NBA recap notes that Minnesota increased its defensive intensity in the third quarter and eventually moved in front.

This was not simply a matter of one team suddenly scoring more.

Minnesota also limited Memphis’ offensive output.

That combination is usually more powerful than simply producing a high-scoring quarter. A team can gain ground quickly when it simultaneously improves its own offense and reduces the opponent’s efficiency.

Why Memphis Could Not Protect Its Early Lead

Memphis started the game strongly.

The Grizzlies scored 32 points in the opening quarter and followed that with 30 points in the second.

At halftime, Memphis had scored 62 points.

However, the team’s third-quarter production dropped to 20 points.

That 20-point quarter created the central problem.

The Grizzlies continued to shoot 39% from three for the game, but their overall offensive output was not consistent enough across all four quarters.

A strong first half can create a lead, but maintaining that advantage requires sustained offensive efficiency and defensive resistance.

Minnesota found a way to shift both during the third quarter.

Why Minnesota’s 117 Points Were Enough

Minnesota scored 117 points despite making only 10 of 34 three-point attempts.

That is significant because many high-scoring NBA performances are strongly connected to efficient three-point shooting.

Minnesota instead relied on several other areas:

• 48% overall field-goal shooting
• 27 made free throws
• 52 rebounds
• 41 points from Edwards
• 23 points from Randle
• 16 points from McDaniels
• 14 points from Reid
• 19 points as a team above Memphis’ final total

This was a more balanced statistical route to 117 points.

The Timberwolves did not need to win every category. They needed enough advantages to offset Memphis’ superior three-point efficiency.

Season Series Context

The supplied matchup history shows four meetings between the teams during this stretch of the season.

The listed results were:

Game	Result
Game 1	Memphis 110, Minnesota 116
Game 2	Memphis 114, Minnesota 131
Game 3	Memphis 137, Minnesota 128
Game 4	Memphis 110, Minnesota 117

The series was listed as tied 2-2 through this matchup.

That context makes the March meeting more useful than simply viewing it as an isolated game.

The teams had already demonstrated that they could produce very different outcomes against each other. One meeting produced a high-scoring Memphis win, while other games favored Minnesota.

The latest 117-110 result therefore added another layer to an already competitive series.

What the Matchup Reveals About Both Teams

The statistical profile provides several useful observations.

Minnesota’s Strengths

Minnesota’s strongest areas were:

• Overall field-goal percentage
• Rebounding
• Free-throw volume
• Individual shot creation
• Multiple double-digit scorers
• Strong second-half response

The rebounding advantage was especially significant.

Memphis’ Strengths

Memphis’ strongest areas included:

• Three-point efficiency
• Total assists
• Strong first-half scoring
• 19 points from Wells
• 11 rebounds from Jackson

The Grizzlies also demonstrated that they could generate efficient perimeter offense.

The Main Statistical Contrast

The most interesting contrast was simple:

Memphis shot better from three, while Minnesota controlled more of the overall possession battle and received the game’s biggest individual scoring performance.

That contrast explains why the final score cannot be understood by looking only at three-point percentage.

A Closer Look at the Team Numbers

The complete team statistical profile provides additional context.

Statistic	Memphis Grizzlies	Minnesota Timberwolves
Points	110	117
FG	36-79	40-84
FG%	46%	48%
3PT	15-38	10-34
3PT%	39%	29%
FT	23-29	27-34
FT%	79%	79%
Rebounds	33	52
Assists	27	19
Turnovers	17	16
Steals	9	8
Blocks	4	2

The table shows that neither team dominated every statistical category.

Memphis had more assists, steals, blocks, and better three-point shooting.

Minnesota had more points, rebounds, field goals, free throws, and slightly fewer turnovers.

The final result came from how these categories interacted.

The Importance of Shot Creation

One of the clearest lessons from this matchup is the importance of having a player capable of creating points when an offense becomes difficult to run.

Edwards’ 41 points gave Minnesota that option.

Even when the Timberwolves were not highly efficient from three as a team, Edwards could continue generating scoring opportunities.

This type of individual production can be especially valuable in games where the opponent is capable of producing efficient perimeter offense.

Minnesota did not have to match Memphis‘ 39% three-point shooting because Edwards provided another path to efficient scoring.

What the Rebounding Numbers Say

The 52-33 rebounding difference deserves additional attention because it was much larger than the shooting differences.

Minnesota collected 19 more rebounds.

That means the Timberwolves were consistently more successful at controlling missed shots.

A team that rebounds well can compensate for inefficient shooting by creating additional possessions.

This was especially relevant because Minnesota made only 10 of 34 three-point attempts.

If the outside shots are not falling, controlling the glass becomes even more valuable.

Understanding the Game Beyond the Box Score

A basic box-score summary might say:

Minnesota won 117-110, Edwards scored 41, and the Timberwolves had more rebounds.

A deeper statistical reading reveals more.

Memphis actually shot better from three and recorded eight more assists.

Minnesota’s advantage came from combining several different strengths rather than dominating one single offensive category.

The Timberwolves shot better overall, made more free throws, collected far more rebounds, committed slightly fewer turnovers, and had an exceptional scoring night from Edwards.

That combination was enough to overcome Memphis’ stronger perimeter shooting.

Why the Matchup Was Competitive

Despite Minnesota’s eventual seven-point win, the game was not controlled from start to finish.

Memphis led after the opening half.

The third quarter created Minnesota’s advantage, while the fourth quarter ended with both teams scoring 28 points.

The official NBA game record also lists five lead changes and two ties, illustrating that the scoreboard moved between the teams before Minnesota established the final advantage.

This makes the final seven-point margin somewhat different from a game in which one team leads comfortably for all four quarters.

Historical and Statistical Context for Readers

For readers comparing individual performances, Edwards’ 41-point night stands out immediately.

Randle’s 23-point, 11-rebound double-double provides the second major Minnesota statistical marker.

On Memphis’ side, Wells’ 19 points and Jackson’s 11 rebounds represent the leading individual production in the supplied figures.

The contrast between the teams is also useful for fantasy basketball and statistical analysis.

A player such as Edwards can produce a major fantasy impact through scoring and three-point production, while players such as Gobert and Jackson can influence fantasy totals through rebounding.

Similarly, DiVincenzo’s six assists demonstrate why secondary statistics can matter even when scoring totals are modest.

What Readers Should Look For in Similar Matchups

When reviewing future Timberwolves and Grizzlies games, several statistical areas are worth monitoring.

1. Rebounding Margin

The first number to watch is the total rebound differential.

A major rebounding gap can create additional possessions and limit second chances.

2. Three-Point Efficiency

Memphis showed how dangerous it can be when its perimeter shooting is working.

The 15-of-38 three-point performance was one of the team’s strongest statistical areas.

3. Edwards’ Shot Volume

For Minnesota, Edwards’ field-goal attempts can provide an early indication of offensive responsibility.

His 29 attempts were the highest-volume scoring profile in this matchup.

4. Turnovers

The two teams were separated by only one turnover, so this category did not determine the game.

However, turnovers can become decisive in a closer matchup.

5. Free-Throw Attempts

Minnesota attempted 34 free throws compared with 29 for Memphis.

The difference was not enormous, but the additional successful free throws contributed to Minnesota’s seven-point advantage.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the final score between the Timberwolves and Grizzlies?

The Minnesota Timberwolves defeated the Memphis Grizzlies 117-110 at Target Center. The official NBA game record confirms the final score.

Who scored the most points in the game?

Anthony Edwards led all players with 41 points for Minnesota. He shot 15 of 29 from the field, including 7 of 13 from three-point range.

Who led the Memphis Grizzlies in scoring?

Jaylen Wells led Memphis with 19 points.

Who had the most rebounds?

Rudy Gobert led Minnesota with 12 rebounds, while GG Jackson led Memphis with 11 rebounds.

Which team shot better from three-point range?

Memphis shot better from three-point range, making 15 of 38 attempts for 39%. Minnesota made 10 of 34 attempts for 29%.

How large was Minnesota’s rebounding advantage?

Minnesota collected 52 rebounds compared with 33 for Memphis, giving the Timberwolves a 19-rebound advantage.

Conclusion

The timberwolves vs memphis grizzlies match player stats show a game in which Minnesota overcame a strong Memphis start by improving its overall control in the second half.

Anthony Edwards was the headline performer with 41 points, including seven made three-pointers and a perfect 4-for-4 performance from the free-throw line. Julius Randle added 23 points and 11 rebounds, while Jaden McDaniels and Naz Reid provided additional scoring support.

Memphis received 19 points from Jaylen Wells, 11 rebounds from GG Jackson, and five assists from Scotty Pippen Jr. The Grizzlies also produced the better three-point shooting performance, finishing at 39% compared with Minnesota’s 29%.

The biggest statistical separation came on the boards. Minnesota collected 52 rebounds to Memphis’ 33, a 19-rebound advantage. The Timberwolves also shot slightly better overall and made four more free throws.

The quarter-by-quarter numbers explain the final result particularly well. Memphis led after scoring 32 points in the first quarter and 30 in the second, but Minnesota responded with 34 points in the second and 32 in the third. Memphis managed only 20 points in the third quarter, allowing Minnesota to take control.

Taken together, the numbers show why the 117-110 result was not simply a story about one player’s scoring total. Edwards’ 41 points were central, but Minnesota’s rebounding, overall shooting, free-throw production, secondary scoring, and second-half response all contributed to the final outcome.