Buffalo Bills vs New York Jets Match Player Stats
The Buffalo Bills vs New York Jets match player stats from September 14, 2025 tell a much clearer story than the final score alone. Buffalo defeated New York 30-10 in NFL Week 2, but the most important details came from the way the Bills controlled the ground game, protected the football, pressured the Jets quarterbacks, and created consistent scoring opportunities. James Cook was the standout offensive player with 132 rushing yards and two touchdowns, while Buffalo’s defense produced four sacks and held New York to only 54 passing yards.
This was also a game where traditional quarterback statistics did not fully explain the outcome. Josh Allen finished with 148 passing yards and no touchdowns, yet Buffalo’s offense moved efficiently enough to build a 20-3 halftime advantage. On the other side, the Jets struggled to generate sustained passing production, finishing with only 54 team passing yards and four sacks allowed.
The result left Buffalo at 2-0 and New York at 0-2 after Week 2. The quarter-by-quarter scoring shows how early the game tilted toward Buffalo: the Bills scored 10 points in the first quarter and another 10 in the second before adding 3 in the third and 7 in the fourth. The Jets did not score their only touchdown until the fourth quarter.
Buffalo Bills vs New York Jets Match Player Stats
The central numbers from the game are straightforward:
| Category | Buffalo Bills | New York Jets |
| Final score | 30 | 10 |
| Passing yards | 179 | 54 |
| Rushing yards | 224 | 100 |
| Total offensive yards | 403 | 154 |
| Passing attempts | 27 | 22 |
| Completions | 15 | 10 |
| Rushing attempts | 43 | 21 |
| Passing TDs | 0 | 1 |
| Rushing TDs | 3 | 0 |
| Sacks allowed | 1 | 4 |
| Fumbles | 2 | 3 |
| Fumbles lost | 0 | 1 |
| Field goals | 3 | 1 |
| First-half points | 20 | 3 |
| Total points | 30 | 10 |
The biggest difference is offensive balance. Buffalo generated 224 rushing yards and 179 passing yards, while New York managed only 100 rushing yards and 54 passing yards.
That 403-to-154 total-yard difference is especially important. Buffalo produced 249 more yards than New York, showing that the final 20-point margin was supported by a substantial statistical advantage rather than being driven only by a few isolated plays.
Game Overview and Scoring Breakdown
Buffalo established control immediately.
The Bills opened the scoring with a James Cook rushing touchdown during an 81-yard touchdown drive. Matt Prater then added a field goal to make the score 10-0 before the first quarter ended.
The second quarter continued the same pattern. Prater connected from 52 yards, and Cook added his second rushing touchdown on a 44-yard run. New York finally got on the scoreboard with a 51-yard Nick Folk field goal.
At halftime, Buffalo led 20-3.
That halftime margin mattered because it changed the structure of the game. Buffalo did not need to rely on aggressive passing volume after establishing the lead. Instead, the Bills could lean on their rushing attack and force New York to find answers against a defense that had already demonstrated its ability to pressure the quarterback.
Buffalo added another field goal in the third quarter, extending the advantage to 23-3.
The Bills then completed another long scoring drive in the fourth quarter. Elijah Moore scored on a four-yard rushing touchdown to make it 30-3.
New York eventually answered with a touchdown pass from Tyrod Taylor to Jeremy Ruckert, but it came with only 3:28 remaining. The Jets had too much ground to make up.
The official game record confirms the 30-10 final score and Buffalo’s 2-0 start.
Josh Allen’s Passing Performance
Josh Allen completed 14 of 25 passes for 148 yards.
His passing average was 5.9 yards per attempt, and he finished without a passing touchdown or interception. He was also sacked once for one yard.
| Josh Allen statistic | Result |
| Completions | 14 |
| Attempts | 25 |
| Completion rate | 56.0% |
| Passing yards | 148 |
| Yards per attempt | 5.9 |
| Passing TDs | 0 |
| Interceptions | 0 |
| Sacks | 1 |
| Sack yards | 1 |
The 148-yard total may appear modest when viewed without context. However, Buffalo did not need Allen to throw for 300-plus yards because the rushing attack was producing explosive plays.
Allen also contributed 59 rushing yards on six carries, averaging 9.8 yards per attempt. That dimension helped Buffalo maintain offensive flexibility.
This is an important lesson when interpreting quarterback statistics. Passing yardage is useful, but it should not be isolated from rushing production, field position, scoring efficiency, and game script.
Buffalo’s offense was not dependent on Allen throwing for multiple touchdowns. Instead, Allen operated within an attack that consistently created positive situations on the ground.
Mitchell Trubisky’s Limited Contribution
Mitchell Trubisky completed one of two passes for 32 yards.
His limited appearance meant his numbers had little effect on the overall offensive picture, but his 32-yard completion contributed to Buffalo’s 179 team passing yards.
The Bills finished with:
- 15 completions on 27 attempts
- 179 passing yards
- 6.7 yards per attempt
- No interceptions
- One sack allowed
That efficiency was enough because the ground game carried a large share of the offensive workload.
James Cook Was the Offensive Standout
If one player best represents the statistical story of this game, it is James Cook.
Cook finished with 21 carries for 132 yards and two touchdowns.
His average was 6.3 yards per carry, and his longest run went for 44 yards.
| James Cook statistic | Result |
| Carries | 21 |
| Rushing yards | 132 |
| Average | 6.3 |
| Rushing TDs | 2 |
| Longest run | 44 yards |
Cook’s 132 rushing yards represented approximately 59% of Buffalo’s 224 rushing yards.
That level of production explains why Buffalo could remain balanced without asking Allen to throw at a high volume.
The two touchdowns were also strategically important. His one-yard touchdown gave Buffalo an early lead, while his 44-yard scoring run expanded the advantage in the second quarter.
The official NFL statistical log also records Cook’s 21 carries, 132 yards, 6.3-yard average and two touchdowns in this Week 2 matchup.
Buffalo’s Rushing Attack Was the Real Difference
The Bills finished with 43 rushing attempts for 224 yards.
That produced an average of 5.2 yards per carry and three rushing touchdowns.
The rushing distribution was:
| Buffalo rusher | Carries | Yards | Average | TD |
| James Cook | 21 | 132 | 6.3 | 2 |
| Josh Allen | 6 | 59 | 9.8 | 0 |
| Ray Davis | 9 | 24 | 2.7 | 0 |
| Elijah Moore | 2 | 6 | 3.0 | 1 |
| Ty Johnson | 2 | 6 | 3.0 | 0 |
| Mitchell Trubisky | 3 | -3 | -1.0 | 0 |
| Team | 43 | 224 | 5.2 | 3 |
The table shows something deeper than Cook’s individual performance.
Allen himself averaged 9.8 yards per carry. That means the Jets defense had to account for both the running back and the quarterback as rushing threats.
Cook’s explosive 44-yard touchdown run further increased the pressure on the defense.
Once Buffalo established this ground-game advantage, the Jets had fewer opportunities to dictate the game on their own terms.
Buffalo Receiving Statistics
Buffalo’s passing attack produced 180 receiving yards on 15 receptions and 25 targets.
Joshua Palmer led the team in receiving yardage with 47 yards on two catches.
| Buffalo receiver | Receptions | Yards | Average | Targets |
| Joshua Palmer | 2 | 47 | 23.5 | 3 |
| Dalton Kincaid | 4 | 37 | 9.3 | 6 |
| Elijah Moore | 1 | 31 | 31.0 | 1 |
| Keon Coleman | 3 | 26 | 8.7 | 3 |
| Dawson Knox | 2 | 19 | 9.5 | 5 |
| Khalil Shakir | 1 | 12 | 12.0 | 2 |
| Jackson Hawes | 1 | 5 | 5.0 | 1 |
| James Cook | 1 | 3 | 3.0 | 1 |
| Team | 15 | 180 | 12.0 | 25 |
Palmer’s 23.5 yards per reception was the highest average among Buffalo players with multiple catches.
Dalton Kincaid, meanwhile, led the Bills with four receptions.
This distribution shows that Buffalo did not rely on one receiver dominating the passing game. The offense spread its opportunities across several players while allowing the running game to remain the primary source of production.
The Jets Quarterback Numbers
New York used both Tyrod Taylor and Justin Fields during the game.
Taylor completed 7 of 11 passes for 56 yards, one touchdown and no interceptions. Fields completed 3 of 11 passes for 27 yards with no touchdowns and no interceptions.
| Jets quarterback | Comp/Att | Yards | Average | TD | INT |
| Tyrod Taylor | 7/11 | 56 | 5.1 | 1 | 0 |
| Justin Fields | 3/11 | 27 | 2.5 | 0 | 0 |
| Team | 10/22 | 54 | 3.8 | 1 | 0 |
The combined numbers are the clearest indicator of the problem.
New York completed only 10 of 22 passes for 54 yards.
The Jets also allowed four sacks for 29 yards.
That combination severely restricted the passing offense.
A team can sometimes overcome low passing volume through an exceptional rushing attack or strong defensive performance. New York did not receive enough production in either area to offset Buffalo’s advantage.
Justin Fields’ Rushing Production
Fields’ passing numbers were limited, but he was New York’s leading rusher.
He carried the ball five times for 49 yards, averaging 9.8 yards per carry. His longest run was 27 yards.
| Jets rusher | Carries | Yards | Average | TD |
| Justin Fields | 5 | 49 | 9.8 | 0 |
| Breece Hall | 10 | 29 | 2.9 | 0 |
| Tyrod Taylor | 3 | 21 | 7.0 | 0 |
| Braelon Allen | 2 | 11 | 5.5 | 0 |
| Arian Smith | 1 | -10 | -10.0 | 0 |
| Team | 21 | 100 | 4.8 | 0 |
Fields’ 49 rushing yards represented nearly half of New York’s rushing production.
That is significant because it demonstrates the difference between individual athletic production and overall offensive efficiency.
Fields produced explosive rushing numbers, but the Jets did not convert that production into rushing touchdowns or enough total offense to stay close.
Breece Hall’s Numbers
Breece Hall carried the ball 10 times for 29 yards.
His 2.9-yard average was considerably lower than Fields’ rushing average.
Hall also recorded two receptions for nine yards.
The contrast between Hall’s rushing efficiency and Fields’ rushing efficiency is useful when reviewing the game. New York had a quarterback who could create yardage with his legs, but the traditional running game did not consistently produce the same level of efficiency.
Against a Buffalo defense that was already limiting the passing game, New York needed more consistent production on the ground.
Garrett Wilson Led Jets Receivers
Garrett Wilson was New York’s leading receiver.
He caught four passes for 50 yards on eight targets, averaging 12.5 yards per reception.
| Jets receiver | Receptions | Yards | Average | Targets | TD |
| Garrett Wilson | 4 | 50 | 12.5 | 8 | 0 |
| Breece Hall | 2 | 9 | 4.5 | 3 | 0 |
| Arian Smith | 1 | 8 | 8.0 | 2 | 0 |
| Isaiah Davis | 1 | 6 | 6.0 | 3 | 0 |
| Jeremy Ruckert | 1 | 5 | 5.0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mason Taylor | 1 | 5 | 5.0 | 2 | 0 |
| Team | 10 | 83 | 8.3 | 21 | 1 |
Wilson accounted for 50 of the Jets’ 83 receiving yards.
That is roughly 60% of the team’s receiving yardage.
His eight targets were also the highest total among Jets receivers.
However, the overall passing volume was too limited to give Wilson enough opportunities to change the game.
Jeremy Ruckert Provided the Jets’ Only Touchdown
Jeremy Ruckert caught one pass for five yards, but it was a touchdown.
The score came in the fourth quarter on a five-yard pass from Tyrod Taylor.
It reduced the deficit from 30-3 to 30-10, but the timing left New York with too little opportunity to mount a comeback.
This illustrates why touchdown totals need context. A touchdown is always valuable, but a late score in a game already decided by a large margin has a different strategic meaning from a touchdown that gives a team the lead or ties the game.
Buffalo Defense Controlled the Passing Game
Buffalo’s defensive numbers were one of the strongest parts of the game.
The Bills recorded:
- 53 total tackles
- 33 solo tackles
- 4 sacks
- 5 tackles for loss
- 4 passes defended
- 7 quarterback hits
The four sacks were particularly important because New York finished with only 54 passing yards.
Buffalo also recorded seven quarterback hits, creating pressure beyond the four plays officially credited as sacks.
The defensive production was spread across multiple players.
Buffalo Sack Leaders
Four Buffalo players recorded one sack each:
- Cole Bishop
- Joe Andreessen
- AJ Epenesa
- Joey Bosa
That distribution is important because it suggests the pressure did not come from only one defensive player.
Buffalo could generate disruption from different parts of the defense.
Jets Defense Produced One Sack
New York’s defense recorded one sack, credited to Jowon Briggs.
The Jets finished with 80 tackles, 40 solo tackles, four tackles for loss, six passes defended and two quarterback hits.
The tackle total was actually much higher than Buffalo’s 53.
But tackle volume alone does not indicate defensive control.
New York’s defense was on the field for long stretches because Buffalo repeatedly sustained drives and generated 224 rushing yards.
This is an important statistical distinction. A high tackle total can sometimes reflect how often a defense is required to make stops rather than how successfully it controls an opponent.
Turnovers and Ball Security
Neither team recorded an interception.
Buffalo had two fumbles and lost none.
New York had three fumbles and lost one.
| Turnover category | Buffalo | New York |
| Fumbles | 2 | 3 |
| Fumbles lost | 0 | 1 |
| Interceptions thrown | 0 | 0 |
| Total turnovers lost | 0 | 1 |
Buffalo’s ability to avoid losing a possession mattered.
The Jets lost one fumble, while Buffalo did not lose either of its fumbles.
That created an additional advantage for the Bills even though the interception totals were identical.
Special Teams Statistics
Special teams played a supporting role in the game.
Matt Prater was perfect on field goals and extra points.
He made three field goals, including a 52-yarder, and converted all three extra points for 12 total points.
Nick Folk made his only field-goal attempt from 51 yards and his only extra-point attempt, finishing with four points.
Buffalo Special Teams
Cameron Johnston punted three times for 130 yards, averaging 43.3 yards per punt.
He placed two punts inside the 20-yard line and had a long of 48 yards.
Brandon Codrington returned four punts for 22 yards.
Buffalo also recorded two kick returns for 47 total yards.
New York Special Teams
Austin McNamara punted seven times for 340 yards, averaging 48.6 yards.
He had three punts inside the 20 and one touchback, with a long of 55 yards.
New York also produced 174 kick-return yards on seven returns.
Isaiah Davis accounted for 134 of those yards on five returns.
These numbers show that the Jets had some useful special-teams production, particularly in kick returns, but it did not compensate for the offensive gap.
Why the Rushing Difference Matters
The most important statistical gap was not necessarily the quarterback comparison.
It was the rushing difference.
Buffalo:
224 rushing yards
New York:
100 rushing yards
That is a 124-yard advantage for Buffalo.
The Bills also averaged 5.2 yards per carry compared with New York’s 4.8.
While the per-carry difference was relatively modest, Buffalo had 43 rushing attempts compared with 21 for the Jets.
That volume allowed Buffalo to keep the offense moving while limiting the need for high-volume passing.
Cook was the centerpiece, but Allen’s 59 rushing yards also made the Bills difficult to defend.
Why Buffalo Won Despite Modest Passing Numbers
One of the most useful lessons from these Buffalo Bills vs New York Jets match player stats is that a quarterback does not need a huge passing total for his team to control a game.
Allen threw for 148 yards.
That would not normally be considered a dominant passing performance.
But Buffalo combined his passing with:
- 224 rushing yards
- Three rushing touchdowns
- Zero turnovers lost
- Four sacks
- Seven quarterback hits
- Three successful field goals
- A 20-3 halftime lead
The Bills created enough offensive efficiency that Allen’s passing workload did not need to carry the entire offense.
This is why a box-score analysis should look at how statistics interact rather than judging each number separately.
Why New York Struggled to Stay Competitive
The Jets’ biggest problem was offensive consistency.
They finished with only 154 total yards.
Their passing attack produced 54 yards, while the rushing game produced 100.
The Jets also had four sacks for 29 yards allowed.
That means their offense was losing yardage and failing to create enough sustained drives.
New York’s 10 points came from one field goal in the second quarter and one touchdown in the fourth.
The Jets therefore went more than three quarters without scoring a touchdown.
Against a team that had already built a 20-3 halftime advantage, that made the comeback challenge extremely difficult.
First-Half Performance Was the Turning Point
The first half deserves special attention.
Buffalo scored 20 points.
New York scored only three.
The Bills therefore entered halftime with a 17-point advantage.
The scoring sequence also shows that Buffalo did not wait until late in the game to take control.
The Bills scored early, added more points in the second quarter, and forced New York to play from behind.
Once the Jets entered the second half trailing 20-3, their offensive margin for error became very small.
The official play-by-play confirms that Buffalo’s scoring drives included Cook’s early rushing touchdown, Prater’s field goals and Cook’s 44-yard touchdown run.
Comparing the Offensive Efficiency
The raw yardage comparison is striking.
Buffalo produced 403 total offensive yards.
New York produced 154.
That gives Buffalo a 249-yard advantage.
Buffalo also produced 224 rushing yards, meaning more than half of its total offense came from the ground.
New York’s total offensive output was less than Buffalo’s rushing total alone.
That is perhaps the clearest way to understand the matchup.
Buffalo’s Offensive Profile
Buffalo’s offense was built around:
- Efficient rushing.
- Explosive Cook runs.
- Allen’s rushing ability.
- Controlled passing volume.
- Zero interceptions.
- Reliable field-goal production.
New York’s Offensive Profile
New York relied more heavily on:
- Fields’ rushing ability.
- Wilson’s receiving production.
- Short passing.
- Field position and special teams.
- Late-game scoring opportunities.
The Buffalo approach produced considerably more total offense.
A Deeper Look at Third-Down Style
The supplied box-score data does not provide a complete third-down conversion table, so it would be inappropriate to invent a conversion percentage.
However, the drive and yardage numbers still reveal something useful.
Buffalo repeatedly generated enough rushing yardage to maintain offensive balance.
New York’s 54 passing yards and four sacks indicate that its passing downs were not consistently producing enough yardage to sustain drives.
This is one reason advanced game analysis should distinguish between available statistics and statistics that are not available in a particular data set.
A reliable analysis does not fill missing information with assumptions.
What the Player Statistics Tell Us About Game Flow
The individual numbers fit together logically.
Cook produced 132 rushing yards.
Allen added 59 rushing yards.
Buffalo’s offense accumulated 224 rushing yards.
Meanwhile, the Jets struggled to generate passing yardage.
Fields was the Jets’ leading rusher with 49 yards, but his passing line was only 3 completions on 11 attempts for 27 yards.
Wilson led New York’s receivers with 50 yards, but the team generated only 83 receiving yards overall.
The defensive statistics then reinforce the same story.
Buffalo had four sacks and seven quarterback hits.
New York had one sack and two quarterback hits.
Every major statistical category points toward the same basic game script: Buffalo controlled the line of scrimmage and maintained offensive balance, while New York struggled to generate enough passing offense.
What Fantasy Football Players Can Learn
Although this article is focused on game statistics rather than fantasy projections, the individual performances provide useful fantasy context.
James Cook’s 21 carries, 132 yards and two touchdowns made him the most productive offensive player from the game.
Josh Allen’s rushing contribution was also significant. His 59 rushing yards provided additional production even though he did not throw a touchdown.
On the Jets side, Garrett Wilson’s eight targets were notable because they represented the largest target share among New York receivers.
However, the team’s low passing output limited the overall ceiling of the receiving group.
Fields’ five carries for 49 yards showed his rushing upside, but his 27 passing yards demonstrated the downside of an offense that could not consistently move the ball through the air.
What the Game Says About Defensive Pressure
Quarterback pressure was another major separator.
Buffalo recorded four sacks and seven quarterback hits.
New York recorded one sack and two quarterback hits.
That is a combined difference of eight quarterback-pressure events in the supplied defensive statistics.
The Bills did not need one defender to dominate the entire game.
Cole Bishop, Joe Andreessen, AJ Epenesa and Joey Bosa each recorded a sack.
That type of distribution can make it harder for an offense to focus protection on one specific pass rusher.
Special Teams Did Not Decide the Game
New York’s kick-return production was actually strong.
The Jets returned seven kickoffs for 174 yards.
Isaiah Davis alone recorded 134 return yards.
But field position is only valuable when an offense can convert it into points.
The Jets’ inability to turn those opportunities into sustained offensive production limited the impact of the return game.
Buffalo’s kicking performance was also more productive.
Prater scored 12 points, including three field goals.
The combination of field goals and rushing touchdowns helped Buffalo build its lead without requiring passing touchdowns.
The Most Important Player Statistics at a Glance
For readers who want the essential numbers without reviewing every category, these are the most meaningful figures:
Buffalo Bills
Josh Allen: 14/25 passing, 148 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT, plus 59 rushing yards.
James Cook: 21 carries, 132 yards, 2 TD, 44-yard long.
Joshua Palmer: 2 receptions, 47 yards, 23.5-yard average.
Dalton Kincaid: 4 receptions, 37 yards.
Matt Prater: 3/3 field goals, 3/3 extra points, 12 points.
Defense: 4 sacks, 7 quarterback hits, 5 tackles for loss.
New York Jets
Tyrod Taylor: 7/11 passing, 56 yards, 1 TD, 0 INT.
Justin Fields: 3/11 passing, 27 yards, plus 49 rushing yards.
Breece Hall: 10 carries, 29 yards.
Garrett Wilson: 4 receptions, 50 yards, 8 targets.
Jeremy Ruckert: 1 reception, 5 yards, 1 TD.
Nick Folk: 1/1 field goal, 1/1 extra point, 4 points.
Defense: 1 sack, 2 quarterback hits, 4 tackles for loss.
How to Read These Statistics Correctly
A common mistake in sports analysis is to look for one player who “won” the statistical battle.
Football rarely works that simply.
A more useful approach is to examine the relationship between categories.
For this game, the relevant chain looks like this:
Buffalo rushing success → sustained offensive balance → early scoring → New York playing from behind → pressure on Jets passing offense → four sacks → limited New York passing production.
That chain is more informative than simply stating that Cook had 132 yards.
Similarly, saying Allen had 148 passing yards without mentioning his 59 rushing yards would leave out an important part of his contribution.
Likewise, looking only at New York’s 100 rushing yards would miss the fact that Fields accounted for nearly half of that total.
Good statistical analysis connects the numbers to the game structure.
Buffalo Bills vs New York Jets Match Player Stats: Key Takeaways
The Buffalo Bills vs New York Jets match player stats from September 14, 2025 show a game controlled by Buffalo’s rushing attack and defensive pressure.
The biggest individual performance came from James Cook, who rushed for 132 yards and two touchdowns.
Josh Allen added 59 rushing yards while passing for 148 yards without an interception.
Buffalo’s entire rushing unit produced 224 yards and three touchdowns.
The defense then limited New York to 154 total yards, including just 54 passing yards.
For New York, Garrett Wilson led the receiving group with 50 yards, while Justin Fields provided 49 rushing yards.
Tyrod Taylor threw the Jets’ only touchdown, a fourth-quarter connection with Jeremy Ruckert.
The statistical contrast is especially clear in total offense: 403 yards for Buffalo compared with 154 for New York.
The Bills also protected the football better, losing no fumbles while the Jets lost one.
The final score of 30-10 therefore reflected a broad statistical advantage rather than one isolated area.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the final score of the Bills vs Jets game?
The Buffalo Bills defeated the New York Jets 30-10 on September 14, 2025, in Week 2 of the NFL regular season.
How many rushing yards did James Cook have against the Jets?
James Cook rushed for 132 yards on 21 carries, averaging 6.3 yards per carry. He scored two rushing touchdowns, including a 44-yard touchdown run.
How did Josh Allen perform against the Jets?
Josh Allen completed 14 of 25 passes for 148 yards with no touchdowns and no interceptions. He also rushed six times for 59 yards.
How many passing yards did the Jets have?
New York finished with only 54 passing yards. Tyrod Taylor threw for 56 yards and Justin Fields threw for 27 yards, with the team total reflecting sack yardage.
Who led the Jets in receiving?
Garrett Wilson led New York with four receptions for 50 yards on eight targets.
How many sacks did the Bills record?
Buffalo recorded four sacks and seven quarterback hits. Cole Bishop, Joe Andreessen, AJ Epenesa and Joey Bosa each recorded one sack.
Conclusion
The Buffalo Bills vs New York Jets match player stats provide a strong example of why NFL box scores need to be read as connected systems rather than isolated numbers.
Buffalo did not need a huge passing performance from Josh Allen because James Cook and the rushing attack consistently generated yardage. Cook’s 132 rushing yards and two touchdowns were the centerpiece, while Allen’s 59 rushing yards added another dimension.
The Bills finished with 224 rushing yards, 403 total yards and 30 points. Their defense complemented that offensive production by recording four sacks and holding New York to only 154 total yards.
The Jets had useful individual contributions. Fields rushed for 49 yards, Wilson caught four passes for 50 yards, and Taylor threw the team’s only touchdown. Yet those performances were not enough to overcome the lack of overall offensive production.
The most revealing numbers remain the total-yardage gap, the rushing advantage, the four-to-one sack difference, the 20-3 halftime score and the turnover difference.
Taken together, those statistics explain the 30-10 result far better than any single player line.
