New York Yankees vs Red Sox Match Player Stats

The new york yankees vs red sox match player stats from June 27, 2026, tell a clear story of Boston controlling the game early and limiting New York’s offense late. The Boston Red Sox defeated the New York Yankees 4-1 at Fenway Park, backed by seven hits, two home runs, and a strong start from J. Bennett. The Yankees managed only three hits and went 0-3 with runners in scoring position. M. Schuemann provided New York’s only run with a 412-foot home run in the fifth inning.

For anyone reviewing the new york yankees vs red sox match player stats, the most important point is not simply the 4-1 final score. Boston created its advantage through early power, timely hitting, and efficient pitching. Yoshida and Seigler each homered in the opening two innings, while W. Contreras delivered a two-run double in the third.

6. Bennett then kept the Yankees from building any meaningful comeback. He worked 6.1 innings, allowed three hits and one earned run, and finished with three strikeouts and two walks. G. Cole, meanwhile, allowed seven hits and four earned runs across 5.1 innings. Those pitching differences explain much of the outcome.

New York Yankees vs Red Sox Match Player Stats: Game Overview

The game took place on June 27, 2026, at Fenway Park in Boston, Massachusetts. Boston finished with a 4-1 victory in a contest that lasted 2 hours and 22 minutes.

The Red Sox produced seven hits from 31 at-bats. The Yankees collected only three hits from 29 at-bats.

Team	Runs	Hits	Errors	At-Bats	RBI	Home Runs
New York Yankees	1	3	0	29	1	1
Boston Red Sox	4	7	0	31	4	2

Neither team committed an error. That is important because Boston’s victory came from offensive execution and pitching rather than defensive mistakes.

The Red Sox also had a small advantage in walks, with two compared with three for New York. Despite the Yankees drawing more walks, they could not convert those opportunities into runs.

New York left four runners on base, while Boston left five. The difference was how the teams handled scoring situations.

The Yankees went 0-3 with runners in scoring position. Boston went 1-6.

That does not mean Boston dominated every situational opportunity. Instead, it shows that Boston capitalized on one important opportunity while the Yankees failed to turn any of their three RISP chances into runs.

Starting Pitching Comparison

Starting pitching was one of the biggest differences in the game.

Boston starter J. Bennett received a game score of 64. Yankees starter G. Cole recorded a game score of 42.

J. Bennett’s Performance

Bennett delivered the stronger start.

His line:

• 6.1 innings
• 3 hits allowed
• 1 earned run
• 2 walks
• 3 strikeouts
• 1 home run allowed

The most valuable part of his outing was limiting damage. The Yankees did not collect many hits against him, and the only run came on Schuemann’s solo home run in the fifth.

Bennett also worked beyond the sixth inning. That allowed Boston to protect its lead without immediately exposing the middle of its bullpen.

His 64 game score reflects a substantially stronger overall outing than Cole’s 42.

G. Cole’s Performance

Cole started for New York and worked 5.1 innings.

His line:

• 5.1 innings
• 7 hits allowed
• 4 earned runs
• 1 walk
• 5 strikeouts
• 2 home runs allowed

The five strikeouts were a positive part of his performance. However, Boston’s ability to produce seven hits and two home runs outweighed that strength.

Cole gave up home runs to M. Yoshida and A. Seigler during the first two innings. Those early mistakes immediately put New York behind.

The third inning created further separation when W. Contreras doubled to center and drove home C. Rafaela and Yoshida.

By the time Cole left the game, Boston had already scored all four of its runs.

Yankees Batting Performance

The Yankees’ offense struggled to generate sustained pressure.

New York finished with:

• 3 hits
• 1 run
• 1 RBI
• 1 home run
• 3 walks
• 6 strikeouts
• 0-3 with runners in scoring position
• 4 runners left on base

The Yankees did not commit an error, so their defeat cannot be blamed on defensive mistakes.

Their main problem was offensive production.

M. Schuemann Provides the Only Run

1. Schuemann was clearly New York’s best offensive performer.

He finished:

• 2 at-bats
• 1 run
• 1 hit
• 1 RBI
• 1 home run
• 1 strikeout

His home run came in the fifth inning with two outs and nobody on base.

The blast traveled 412 feet to center field.

That was an impressive individual moment, but it was also a perfect example of New York’s larger problem. The Yankees’ only run came from a solo homer rather than a sustained rally.

P. Goldschmidt

1. Goldschmidt went 0-for-3 and drew one walk.

His final line included no runs, hits, or RBIs.

Because the Yankees were unable to string hits together, a walk alone did not create enough offensive pressure to change the game.

B. Rice

1. Rice went 0-for-4 with one strikeout.

He did not record a hit, run, RBI, or walk.

A. Rosario

1. Rosario was one of only three Yankees players to collect a hit.

He went 1-for-4 without scoring or driving in a run.

His single contributed to the team’s total, but New York could not turn its limited base traffic into additional scoring.

C. Bellinger

1. Bellinger went 1-for-2 and drew two walks.

His ability to reach base was one of the few bright spots for New York.

Bellinger’s final line was:

• 2 at-bats
• 1 hit
• 2 walks
• 0 runs
• 0 RBIs

Despite reaching base three times, he did not score.

That is a useful illustration of the Yankees’ offensive problem. Individual players found ways to reach base, but the lineup did not consistently move those runners around the bases.

Remaining Yankees Hitters

1. Dominguez went 0-for-4 with one strikeout.
2. Caballero went 0-for-3 with two strikeouts.
3. Chisholm Jr. went 0-for-1 with one strikeout.
4. Volpe went 0-for-3.
5. Wells went 0-for-3.

Together, these results show how difficult it was for New York to create a complete offensive sequence.

Red Sox Batting Performance

Boston’s lineup was much more productive.

The Red Sox finished with seven hits, four runs, four RBIs, and two home runs.

The offense also scored all four runs before New York’s fifth-inning response.

That early scoring pattern mattered because it allowed Boston’s pitching staff to operate with a lead for most of the game.

M. Yoshida Leads Boston

1. Yoshida was one of the game’s most influential hitters.

His line:

• 3 at-bats
• 2 runs
• 2 hits
• 1 RBI
• 1 home run

Yoshida hit a home run to right-center field in the first inning.

The home run traveled 386 feet and came against G. Cole with nobody on base.

It was also listed as Yoshida’s second home run of the season.

Yoshida later scored again when Contreras delivered his two-run double.

His two runs were particularly valuable because Boston ultimately won by only three runs.

A. Seigler Adds Another Home Run

1. Seigler continued Boston’s early power surge.

He finished:

• 2 at-bats
• 1 run
• 1 hit
• 1 RBI
• 1 home run
• 1 walk

His home run came in the second inning against Cole.

The ball traveled 339 feet to left field.

The home run was listed as Seigler’s first of the season.

With Yoshida homering in the first and Seigler following in the second, Boston quickly forced New York to play from behind.

W. Contreras Delivers the Key Hit

1. Contreras did not hit a home run, but his double was arguably the most important non-homer hit of the game.

He went 1-for-3 and drew one walk.

More importantly, his double drove in C. Rafaela and M. Yoshida.

That gave Contreras two RBIs.

His performance was:

• 3 at-bats
• 1 hit
• 2 RBIs
• 1 walk
• 0 runs

The two-run double in the third inning gave Boston a four-run lead.

This was a classic example of the difference between individual power and situational hitting. Boston’s home runs created the initial advantage, while Contreras converted an additional opportunity into two more runs.

C. Rafaela

1. Rafaela went 2-for-4 with one run scored.

He was one of Boston’s two players with multiple hits.

Rafaela’s double-digit offensive contribution was not necessary to appear on the scoreboard as an RBI. He reached base and later scored on Contreras’ double.

C. Durbin

1. Durbin went 1-for-4 with one strikeout.

He did not score or drive in a run.

His single contributed to Boston’s seven-hit total.

Boston’s Other Hitters

1. Eaton went 0-for-1 with one strikeout.
2. Abreu went 0-for-4 with two strikeouts.
3. Duran went 0-for-4 with two strikeouts.
4. Narvaez went 0-for-3 with two strikeouts.
5. Cheng went 0-for-3 with one strikeout.

Even though several Red Sox hitters went without a hit, the lineup received enough production from Yoshida, Rafaela, Contreras, Durbin, and Seigler to produce four runs.

Complete Yankees Player Stats

Here is a consolidated look at the Yankees’ offensive production.

Player	AB	R	H	RBI	BB	HR	K
P. Goldschmidt	3	0	0	0	1	0	0
B. Rice	4	0	0	0	0	0	1
A. Rosario	4	0	1	0	0	0	0
C. Bellinger	2	0	1	0	2	0	0
J. Dominguez	4	0	0	0	0	0	1
J. Caballero	3	0	0	0	0	0	2
J. Chisholm Jr.	1	0	0	0	0	0	1
A. Volpe	3	0	0	0	0	0	0
A. Wells	3	0	0	0	0	0	0
M. Schuemann	2	1	1	1	0	1	1

Schuemann produced the only Yankees home run and the only Yankees RBI.

Rosario and Bellinger provided the team’s other two hits.

The Yankees’ three total hits were therefore concentrated among Schuemann, Rosario, and Bellinger.

Complete Red Sox Player Stats

The Boston offensive line was more productive overall.

Player	AB	R	H	RBI	BB	HR	K
N. Eaton	1	0	0	0	0	0	1
C. Rafaela	4	1	2	0	0	0	0
W. Abreu	4	0	0	0	0	0	2
W. Contreras	3	0	1	2	1	0	0
J. Duran	4	0	0	0	0	0	2
C. Durbin	4	0	1	0	0	0	1
A. Seigler	2	1	1	1	1	1	0
C. Narvaez	3	0	0	0	0	0	2
T. Cheng	3	0	0	0	0	0	1
M. Yoshida	3	2	2	1	0	1	0

Yoshida and Rafaela each recorded two hits.

Yoshida also scored twice.

Contreras led the game in RBIs with two.

Seigler and Yoshida each supplied one home run.

Pitching Comparison

The complete pitching comparison provides a clearer picture of why Boston won.

Yankees Pitching

New York used four pitchers:

• G. Cole
• B. Headrick
• C. Doval
• P. Blackburn

The team pitching line was:

• 8.0 innings
• 7 hits
• 4 runs
• 4 earned runs
• 2 walks
• 9 strikeouts
• 2 home runs allowed

Cole took the loss after allowing all four Boston runs.

Headrick, Doval, and Blackburn completed the remaining innings without changing the final deficit.

Red Sox Pitching

Boston used:

• J. Bennett
• J. Slaten
• G. Whitlock
• A. Chapman

The team pitching line was:

• 9.0 innings
• 3 hits
• 1 run
• 1 earned run
• 3 walks
• 6 strikeouts
• 1 home run allowed

Bennett earned the victory.

Chapman recorded the save.

The Red Sox pitching staff’s most impressive achievement was limiting New York to three hits over nine innings.

A. Chapman Closes the Game

1. Chapman handled the ninth inning and earned his 16th save.

His line was:

• 1.0 inning
• 0 hits
• 0 earned runs
• 1 strikeout
• 1 walk

The Yankees could not produce a hit against him.

Although Chapman issued one walk, he prevented that baserunner from becoming a scoring threat.

That completed Boston’s 4-1 victory.

Scoring Summary by Inning

The scoring sequence explains the game better than the final score alone.

First Inning

1. Yoshida opened the scoring with a home run to right-center field.

The ball traveled 386 feet.

Boston immediately established a 1-0 lead.

Second Inning

1. Seigler followed with another solo home run.

His shot went 339 feet to left field.

Boston extended its advantage to 2-0.

Two innings into the game, the Red Sox had already hit two home runs.

Third Inning

1. Contreras delivered the game’s biggest scoring hit.

His double to center scored C. Rafaela and M. Yoshida.

The Red Sox moved ahead 4-0.

At that point, Boston had scored all four of its runs.

Fifth Inning

1. Schuemann answered with a solo home run.

His 412-foot shot to center came with two outs and nobody on base.

The Yankees cut the deficit to 4-1.

However, that was the end of the scoring.

Boston’s pitching staff protected the three-run lead through the final four innings.

Why Boston Won

The new york yankees vs red sox match player stats reveal several specific reasons behind Boston’s victory.

1. Boston Won the Hit Battle

The Red Sox had seven hits.

The Yankees had three.

That four-hit difference was significant in a low-scoring game.

Boston also received two-hit performances from Yoshida and Rafaela.

New York had only three players record hits.

2. Boston Hit Two Early Home Runs

Yoshida and Seigler homered in the first two innings.

That gave Boston an immediate 2-0 advantage.

Early home runs also changed the pressure level on the Yankees’ offense.

Instead of playing a scoreless game, New York had to chase the game from the second inning onward.

3. Contreras Produced the Biggest RBI Hit

The two-run double by Contreras was the decisive offensive play.

His hit turned a 2-0 lead into a 4-0 advantage.

That meant Boston could afford to surrender Schuemann’s fifth-inning solo homer without losing control.

4. Bennett Limited New York

Bennett allowed only three hits.

He also surrendered only one earned run.

That was exactly what Boston needed after building an early lead.

5. New York Struggled With Runners in Scoring Position

The Yankees went 0-3 with runners in scoring position.

In a 4-1 game, those missed opportunities mattered.

Even converting one of those situations could have changed the game’s pressure.

Instead, Boston’s pitching escaped each opportunity without allowing an RBI hit.

The Importance of the Home Run Distribution

Home runs were central to the game, but their timing was even more important.

Boston hit two home runs before the Yankees scored.

The Yankees hit only one home run, and it came as a solo shot.

This created an important difference in offensive value.

Yoshida’s home run gave Boston its first run.

Seigler’s home run doubled the lead.

Schuemann’s home run reduced the deficit but did not create additional baserunners.

All three home runs were solo shots, but Boston’s came earlier and were supported by Contreras’ two-run double.

That combination produced four total runs.

Game Score: Bennett vs. Cole

The recorded game scores were:

Pitcher	Game Score
J. Bennett	64
G. Cole	42

The 22-point gap illustrates the difference between the two starting pitching performances.

Bennett gave Boston more innings, allowed fewer hits, and surrendered only one run.

Cole struck out more batters, with five compared with Bennett’s three, but the additional strikeouts could not offset the seven hits and two home runs he allowed.

This is an important lesson when evaluating pitching performance. Strikeout totals matter, but they should be considered alongside hits, runs, home runs, walks, and workload.

What the Advanced Game Numbers Tell Us

The basic box score already explains the result, but several deeper observations make the game more interesting.

Boston scored four runs from seven hits.

New York scored one run from three hits.

That means both teams averaged the same number of hits per run in a very broad sense, but Boston generated far more total offensive opportunities.

The Yankees also had three walks compared with two for Boston.

Therefore, Boston did not win simply because it reached base more often through walks.

Instead, its advantage came from turning contact into meaningful production.

The Red Sox also had four RBIs compared with one for New York.

That directly reflects their ability to produce runs through their offensive opportunities.

Yankees Offensive Efficiency

New York’s offense had several isolated positive moments.

Bellinger reached base three times through one hit and two walks.

Schuemann produced a home run.

Rosario recorded a hit.

Yet those individual performances did not connect into a larger rally.

This is one of the most useful insights from the box score.

A team can have multiple players reaching base without necessarily creating runs. Baseball scoring depends heavily on sequencing.

The Yankees’ 0-3 RISP record shows that sequencing was a major weakness in this game.

Red Sox Offensive Efficiency

Boston’s offense was more effective at converting its opportunities.

Yoshida scored twice.

Rafaela scored once.

Seigler scored once.

Contreras drove in two runs.

Yoshida and Seigler supplied the power, while Contreras supplied the most important situational hit.

That balance is what separated Boston’s offense from New York’s.

Boston did not need every hitter to produce.

It needed enough players to contribute at the right moments.

Defensive Performance

Both teams finished the game without an error.

That means:

• Yankees errors: 0
• Red Sox errors: 0

The clean defensive performance from both sides makes the pitching and hitting differences even more important.

Neither team handed the opponent extra opportunities through fielding mistakes.

Boston simply executed better offensively and received the stronger starting pitching performance.

Game Context and Attendance

The game was played at Fenway Park in Boston, Massachusetts.

Attendance was listed at 36,026.

The contest lasted 2 hours and 22 minutes and was covered by ABC.

The home environment therefore featured a large crowd watching a game that Boston controlled from the opening innings.

The listed umpires were Clint Vondrak at home plate, Adam Hamari at first base, Todd Tichenor at second base, and Tyler Jones at third base.

Series Context

The supplied data lists Boston as winning the series 4-0.

The series information includes the following results:

Series Game	Result	Date
Game 1	Yankees 3, Red Sox 6	June 26
Game 2	Yankees 1, Red Sox 6	June 27
Game 3	Yankees 1, Red Sox 4	June 27
Game 4	Yankees 4, Red Sox 5	June 29

The provided game data identifies the June 27 matchup discussed in this article as Game ID 401815924.

Because the supplied series information contains multiple games on June 27, the player analysis in this article is specifically tied to the 4-1 Red Sox victory and its associated box-score data.

Most Important Player Takeaways

Several individual performances stand above the rest.

Best Yankees Offensive Player: M. Schuemann

Schuemann delivered the Yankees’ only RBI and only home run.

His 412-foot homer gave New York its lone run.

Best Red Sox Offensive Player: M. Yoshida

Yoshida went 2-for-3, scored twice, drove in one run, and hit a home run.

He was directly involved in half of Boston’s four runs as a scorer and added another RBI.

Most Important RBI Performance: W. Contreras

Contreras drove in two runs with his third-inning double.

Those two RBIs increased Boston’s lead from 2-0 to 4-0.

Best Starting Pitcher: J. Bennett

Bennett worked 6.1 innings and allowed just three hits and one earned run.

His game score of 64 was the best among the two starting pitchers.

Best Closing Performance: A. Chapman

Chapman finished the game with a scoreless ninth inning.

He allowed no hits and recorded a strikeout while earning his 16th save.

What Yankees Fans Should Take From the Game

The box score suggests that New York’s biggest concern was not simply a lack of power.

The Yankees did hit a home run.

The larger problem was the inability to generate enough total traffic and convert opportunities.

Three hits across nine innings is difficult to overcome against a team that scores four runs.

The 0-3 RISP mark also shows that the Yankees did not capitalize when they had chances.

At the same time, there were some encouraging individual signs.

Bellinger reached base three times.

Schuemann provided power.

Rosario collected a hit.

But those moments remained isolated.

What Red Sox Fans Should Take From the Game

Boston’s biggest positive was its balance.

The team combined power hitting with timely contact.

Yoshida and Seigler provided early home runs.

Contreras supplied the two-run double.

Rafaela added two hits and scored.

Bennett then protected the lead with a strong start.

The bullpen completed the job, with Chapman earning the save.

That is a strong blueprint for winning a low-scoring game.

Key Numbers at a Glance

For readers who want the most important numbers quickly, these are the figures that define the matchup:

• Final score: Red Sox 4, Yankees 1
• Yankees hits: 3
• Red Sox hits: 7
• Yankees home runs: 1
• Red Sox home runs: 2
• Yankees RISP: 0-3
• Red Sox RISP: 1-6
• Yankees errors: 0
• Red Sox errors: 0
• Bennett innings: 6.1
• Cole innings: 5.1
• Bennett earned runs: 1
• Cole earned runs: 4
• Bennett game score: 64
• Cole game score: 42
• Chapman saves: 16
• Attendance: 36,026
• Game time: 2 hours, 22 minutes

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the final score between the Yankees and Red Sox on June 27, 2026?

The Boston Red Sox defeated the New York Yankees 4-1 at Fenway Park.

Who was the best player in the game?

Yoshida was one of the top offensive performers. He went 2-for-3, scored twice, drove in one run, and hit a home run.

Who was the winning p

itcher?

Bennett earned the win. He pitched 6.1 innings and allowed three hits and one earned run.

<h3>Who took the loss for the Yankees?

Cole was the losing pitcher. He allowed seven hits and four earned runs in 5.1 innings.

How many home runs did each team hit?

The Yankees hit one home run, by M. Schuemann. The Red Sox hit two, by M. Yoshida and A. Seigler.

How did the Yankees perform with runners in scoring position?

The Yankees went 0-3 with runners in scoring position. The Red Sox went 1-6.

Conclusion

The new york yankees vs red sox match player stats from June 27, 2026, show a game decided by early Boston offense and effective pitching.

The Red Sox scored four runs in the first three innings. Yoshida started the scoring with a first-inning home run. Seigler followed with another home run in the second. Contreras then delivered a two-run double in the third.

New York answered with Schuemann’s 412-foot home run in the fifth, but the Yankees could not produce another run.

Bennett was the biggest pitching difference. His 6.1-inning performance limited New York to three hits and one earned run. Cole allowed seven hits, four earned runs, and two home runs.

The Yankees also struggled in key situations, finishing 0-3 with runners in scoring position.

Boston’s seven hits, two home runs, four RBIs, and stronger starting pitching ultimately produced the 4-1 victory.

For anyone studying the new york yankees vs red sox match player stats, the main lesson is clear: Boston combined timely power, situational hitting, and efficient pitching, while New York’s offensive opportunities remained too limited to create a comeback.