Cleveland Cavaliers vs Knicks Match Player Stats
The cleveland cavaliers vs knicks match player stats from Game 4 of the 2026 Eastern Conference Finals tell a clear story of New York’s control from the opening quarter to the final buzzer. The Knicks defeated the Cavaliers 130-93 at Rocket Arena on May 26, completing a 4-0 sweep and securing their place in the NBA Finals.
The 37-point margin was not simply the result of one outstanding scorer. New York received major contributions across its starting lineup and bench. Karl-Anthony Towns controlled the glass, OG Anunoby delivered an efficient two-way performance, Landry Shamet provided exceptional shooting off the bench, and the Knicks collectively dominated the possession battle.
Cleveland had one major individual scoring performance from Donovan Mitchell, who finished with 31 points. However, the Cavaliers struggled to match New York’s overall efficiency, ball movement, rebounding and three-point shooting. Cleveland also committed 22 turnovers compared with only 13 by New York.
This makes the game especially useful for understanding why individual scoring numbers do not always explain the final result. Mitchell scored 31 points, but New York had six players in double figures. The Knicks also collected 60 rebounds and 33 assists, giving them control in several areas that directly influenced the outcome.
Cleveland Cavaliers vs Knicks Match Player Stats: Game Overview
Game 4 was played at Rocket Arena in Cleveland, Ohio, with 19,432 fans in attendance. It was the fourth and final game of the Eastern Conference Finals series.
The Knicks entered the contest with a 3-0 series advantage. Cleveland needed a victory to extend the series, while New York needed only one more win to complete the sweep.
New York did much more than simply close out the series. The Knicks produced one of their most convincing performances of the postseason, winning every quarter.
| Quarter | Knicks | Cavaliers |
| First | 38 | 26 |
| Second | 30 | 23 |
| Third | 30 | 22 |
| Fourth | 32 | 22 |
| Final | 130 | 93 |
The scoring pattern is important.
The Knicks did not build a large lead and then allow Cleveland to recover. They continued increasing their advantage throughout the game.
New York scored 38 points in the first quarter and entered halftime with a substantial advantage. The offense remained productive after the break, with another 30-point third quarter followed by 32 points in the fourth.
Cleveland never found a sustained response.
The final 130-93 score represented a 37-point victory, and the result completed a 4-0 series sweep.
The NBA’s official postseason schedule also records the four-game series as 115-104 in Game 1, 109-93 in Game 2, 121-108 in Game 3 and 130-93 in Game 4. NBA’s official 2026 playoff schedule
Team Statistics That Decided the Game
Looking beyond the scoreboard provides a better understanding of why the Knicks won so comfortably.
Field Goal Shooting
New York made 48 of 98 field-goal attempts for 49 percent shooting.
Cleveland made 32 of 77 attempts for 42 percent.
The difference was seven percentage points, but the impact was greater because New York also generated more opportunities through offensive rebounding and ball movement.
The Knicks attempted 21 more field goals than Cleveland.
That is a major possession advantage.
Three-Point Shooting
The Knicks were particularly effective from outside.
New York shot 19 of 43 from three-point range, or 44 percent.
Cleveland made 11 of 40 attempts, or 28 percent.
That produced a major difference in perimeter efficiency.
New York’s 19 made threes accounted for 57 points. Cleveland’s 11 made threes accounted for 33 points.
The 24-point difference from made three-pointers alone explains a significant portion of the final margin.
Rebounding
The rebounding numbers were even more striking.
The Knicks collected 60 total rebounds.
The Cavaliers collected only 33.
That created a 27-rebound advantage for New York.
New York also grabbed 20 offensive rebounds compared with just six for Cleveland.
Offensive rebounds matter because they create additional possessions. A team can miss a shot and still maintain control of the ball, giving its offense another opportunity to score.
New York’s 20 offensive rebounds were therefore more than a secondary statistic. They helped sustain pressure throughout the game.
Assists and Ball Movement
New York recorded 33 assists.
Cleveland recorded 21.
The 12-assist advantage indicates a significant difference in offensive coordination.
The Knicks did not rely entirely on difficult individual shots. Their offense repeatedly created opportunities through passing, movement and second chances.
Turnovers
Turnovers were another major factor.
The Knicks committed 13 turnovers.
The Cavaliers committed 22.
That nine-turnover difference gave New York additional transition opportunities while reducing Cleveland’s chances to establish consistent offensive possessions.
The Knicks also recorded 15 steals compared with nine for Cleveland.
This combination of low turnovers and high defensive activity helped New York control the tempo.
Free Throws
Cleveland actually had the better free-throw percentage.
The Cavaliers shot 18 of 22 from the line, or 82 percent.
The Knicks shot 15 of 20, or 75 percent.
However, Cleveland’s advantage at the free-throw line was not enough to compensate for its disadvantages in shooting from the field, three-point accuracy, rebounding and turnovers.
This is an important lesson when analyzing basketball statistics. A team can win an individual statistical category and still lose badly if it performs poorly across several higher-volume categories.
Knicks Player Statistics
The Knicks received contributions from nearly every part of their rotation.
Six New York players reached double figures, giving the offense considerable balance.
Karl-Anthony Towns
Karl-Anthony Towns delivered one of the strongest all-around performances for New York.
He finished with:
- 19 points
- 14 rebounds
- 3 assists
- 2 steals
- 2 blocks
- 8-of-11 field goals
- 3-of-3 three-pointers
His 14 rebounds were particularly important.
Towns did not simply contribute as a scorer. He controlled the defensive glass while also providing additional possessions on offense.
His 8-of-11 shooting was extremely efficient, and his perfect 3-of-3 shooting from three-point range added another layer to his offensive value.
The combination of interior size and perimeter shooting created a difficult matchup for Cleveland.
OG Anunoby
OG Anunoby finished with:
- 17 points
- 7 rebounds
- 4 assists
- 2 steals
- 6-of-13 field goals
- 1-of-5 three-pointers
- 4-of-4 free throws
Anunoby’s value went beyond his 17 points.
He contributed in multiple areas, including rebounding, playmaking and defensive activity.
His two steals also contributed to New York’s defensive pressure.
When evaluating his performance through the lens of the overall game, Anunoby was another example of the Knicks’ balanced approach. He did not need to lead the team in scoring to have a major impact.
Landry Shamet
Landry Shamet was one of the most efficient players on the floor.
He scored 16 points while shooting:
- 5-of-6 from the field
- 4-of-4 from three-point range
- 2-of-2 from the free-throw line
His four made three-pointers were particularly valuable.
Shamet’s perfect shooting from beyond the arc helped stretch Cleveland’s defense and added another dangerous perimeter option to an already balanced Knicks attack.
A bench player producing 16 points on 5-of-6 shooting is exactly the type of performance that can turn a competitive playoff game into a blowout.
Mikal Bridges
Mikal Bridges scored 15 points.
He added three rebounds and five assists while shooting 4-of-16 from the field.
His shooting efficiency was not as strong as Towns or Shamet, but his five assists contributed to New York’s overall ball movement.
He also went 6-of-6 at the free-throw line.
Jalen Brunson
Jalen Brunson finished with:
- 15 points
- 2 rebounds
- 5 assists
- 6-of-14 field goals
- 2-of-5 three-pointers
- 1-of-2 free throws
Brunson’s scoring total was not his highest of the series, but the Knicks did not need a huge individual scoring performance from their lead guard.
His five assists helped keep the offense organized.
That is one of the most important themes from these Cleveland Cavaliers vs Knicks match player stats. New York’s leading players did not all need to score 25 or 30 points because the offense had enough depth to distribute production.
Josh Hart
Josh Hart recorded:
- 6 points
- 11 rebounds
- 6 assists
- 2 steals
- 2-of-5 field goals
- 1-of-3 three-pointers
Hart’s offensive scoring was modest, but his 11 rebounds and six assists made his overall contribution significant.
He was particularly valuable in the areas that do not always receive the same attention as scoring.
His 11 rebounds helped New York dominate the glass, while six assists supported the team’s efficient offensive movement.
Miles McBride
Miles McBride scored 11 points off the bench.
He also recorded:
- 2 rebounds
- 2 assists
- 3 steals
- 4-of-6 field goals
- 3-of-5 three-pointers
His three steals were an important defensive contribution.
McBride also provided reliable perimeter shooting, making three of his five attempts from outside.
Mitchell Robinson
Mitchell Robinson produced eight points and 10 rebounds.
He shot 4-of-6 from the field.
His rebounding added to New York’s overwhelming advantage on the glass.
Robinson’s role was especially useful in a game where Cleveland struggled to keep the Knicks away from second-chance opportunities.
Tyler Kolek
Tyler Kolek finished with eight points, one rebound and one assist.
He shot 3-of-7 from the field and made two of three three-point attempts.
His perimeter shooting gave the Knicks another source of scoring depth.
Pacome Dadiet
Pacome Dadiet recorded six points, one rebound and one steal.
He shot 2-of-4 from the field and 1-of-2 from three-point range.
Jose Alvarado
Jose Alvarado added four points, two assists and two steals while shooting 2-of-3 from the field.
His two steals continued New York’s defensive activity.
Jordan Clarkson
Jordan Clarkson scored three points, finishing 1-of-6 from the field and 1-of-4 from three-point range.
Ariel Hukporti
Ariel Hukporti contributed two points, five rebounds, one assist and one steal.
He made his only field-goal attempt.
Mohamed Diawara
Mohamed Diawara did not score but collected three rebounds and two assists.
His contribution reflected the Knicks’ ability to receive useful production even when every player was not scoring.
Cavaliers Player Statistics
Cleveland had one outstanding scoring performance from Donovan Mitchell, while Evan Mobley and James Harden also contributed.
However, the overall offensive production was not enough to keep pace with New York.
Donovan Mitchell
Donovan Mitchell was Cleveland’s leading scorer with 31 points.
He finished with:
- 31 points
- 4 rebounds
- 1 assist
- 4 turnovers
- 1 steal
- 9-of-18 field goals
- 5-of-9 three-pointers
- 8-of-10 free throws
Mitchell’s 31 points were easily the highest scoring total for either team.
His five made three-pointers were also a major part of Cleveland’s offensive output.
However, his individual production illustrates an important issue.
Scoring 31 points is excellent, but Cleveland needed more collective offensive production. The Cavaliers finished with only 93 points while New York reached 130.
Mitchell’s scoring accounted for one-third of Cleveland’s total points.
That shows how heavily the Cavaliers depended on one primary scorer in this game.
Evan Mobley
Evan Mobley recorded:
- 15 points
- 7 rebounds
- 4 assists
- 1 steal
- 7-of-15 field goals
- 1-of-4 three-pointers
Mobley’s 15 points matched the scoring total of several Knicks players, but New York’s depth made those individual numbers less impactful.
His four assists were also useful, showing that his contribution was not limited to scoring.
James Harden
James Harden finished with 12 points, four rebounds and two assists.
He also recorded:
- 5 turnovers
- 1 steal
- 1 block
- 2-of-8 field goals
- 8-of-9 free throws
Harden’s free-throw shooting was excellent, but his five turnovers were costly.
In a game where Cleveland already struggled to maintain possession, five turnovers from one player placed additional pressure on the rest of the lineup.
Jarrett Allen
Jarrett Allen recorded six points, three rebounds, one assist, two steals and two blocks.
He shot 3-of-5 from the field.
His defensive activity was notable, but Cleveland’s overall rebounding disadvantage limited the team’s ability to benefit from its interior presence.
Max Strus
Max Strus scored five points with two rebounds and two assists.
He shot 2-of-6 from the field and 1-of-4 from three-point range.
Cleveland needed stronger perimeter efficiency from its supporting shooters, especially because New York was shooting 44 percent from three.
Cavaliers Bench Statistics
Cleveland’s bench struggled to provide enough scoring pressure.
Thomas Bryant was the leading bench scorer with 10 points.
He shot 4-of-7 from the field and made two of five three-point attempts.
Sam Merrill added five points, one rebound and one assist while making one three-pointer.
Keon Ellis scored five points, adding two rebounds, one assist, one steal and a perfect 2-of-2 performance at the free-throw line.
Nae’Qwan Tomlin contributed two points, one rebound and one assist.
Jaylon Tyson scored two points and collected three rebounds and two assists.
Dean Wade did not score but contributed one rebound, one assist, two steals and one block.
Craig Porter Jr. finished scoreless but recorded one rebound and three assists. He also committed three turnovers.
Tyrese Proctor did not score and finished with one rebound and two assists.
The lack of scoring from several reserve players made Cleveland’s offensive burden even heavier.
Knicks vs Cavaliers Statistical Comparison
The most useful way to understand the game is to compare the major team categories side by side.
| Category | Knicks | Cavaliers |
| Points | 130 | 93 |
| Field Goals | 48-98 | 32-77 |
| FG Percentage | 49% | 42% |
| Three-Pointers | 19-43 | 11-40 |
| 3PT Percentage | 44% | 28% |
| Free Throws | 15-20 | 18-22 |
| FT Percentage | 75% | 82% |
| Rebounds | 60 | 33 |
| Assists | 33 | 21 |
| Turnovers | 13 | 22 |
| Steals | 15 | 9 |
| Blocks | 2 | 4 |
| Offensive Rebounds | 20 | 6 |
| Defensive Rebounds | 40 | 27 |
| Personal Fouls | 20 | 18 |
The numbers reveal that New York won in almost every high-impact category.
Cleveland’s advantages were limited to free-throw percentage and blocks.
The Knicks had the clear advantage in scoring, shooting, three-point efficiency, rebounding, assists, turnovers and steals.
Why the 60-33 Rebounding Advantage Mattered
The 27-rebound difference deserves special attention.
Basketball possessions are extremely valuable in playoff games.
When a team dominates the offensive glass, it can turn missed shots into additional scoring chances.
New York collected 20 offensive rebounds.
Cleveland collected only six.
That is a difference of 14 offensive rebounds.
It means New York repeatedly extended possessions after missed shots.
Karl-Anthony Towns and Josh Hart were particularly important in this area. Towns finished with 14 rebounds, while Hart recorded 11.
Mitchell Robinson added 10.
Three Knicks players therefore reached double figures in rebounds or came close to doing so, creating a sustained advantage against Cleveland’s frontcourt.
Why Turnovers Hurt Cleveland
Cleveland committed 22 turnovers.
New York committed 13.
The nine-turnover difference gave the Knicks additional opportunities to attack before Cleveland’s defense could get organized.
It also prevented Cleveland from building offensive rhythm.
James Harden alone committed five turnovers.
Craig Porter Jr. added three.
Donovan Mitchell committed four.
Those three players accounted for 12 of Cleveland’s 22 turnovers.
That concentration is important because turnovers by primary ball handlers can be particularly damaging. They remove a scoring opportunity from the team while often creating a transition opportunity for the opponent.
New York’s 15 steals also indicate how actively the Knicks pressured Cleveland’s ball handlers.
The Importance of Three-Point Efficiency
The Knicks made 19 three-pointers.
The Cavaliers made 11.
That eight-three difference was significant.
New York also shot 44 percent from outside compared with Cleveland’s 28 percent.
This was not simply a case of taking more three-pointers.
The Knicks were more accurate while also making more shots.
Karl-Anthony Towns went 3-of-3.
Landry Shamet went 4-of-4.
Miles McBride went 3-of-5.
Mikal Bridges made one three-pointer.
Jalen Brunson made two.
The Knicks therefore received efficient perimeter shooting from multiple players.
Cleveland, by contrast, relied heavily on Mitchell’s five made threes.
How New York Built the Game’s Momentum
The first quarter set the tone.
New York scored 38 points while Cleveland scored 26.
The Knicks therefore established a 12-point lead immediately.
The second quarter continued the pressure, with New York scoring another 30 points compared with 23 from Cleveland.
At halftime, the Knicks had created a substantial advantage.
Rather than slowing down after halftime, New York continued to score 30 points in the third quarter.
The fourth quarter produced another 32 points.
This consistency is one of the most impressive elements of the performance.
New York did not rely on a single explosive quarter followed by defensive survival. The team maintained offensive pressure across all four periods.
What Donovan Mitchell’s 31 Points Tell Us
A simple box-score reading might suggest that Mitchell had the best individual offensive performance because he scored 31 points.
That is true in terms of scoring.
But the larger statistical picture is more complicated.
Mitchell scored 31 of Cleveland’s 93 points.
That means he accounted for roughly one-third of the Cavaliers’ total.
New York’s scoring was much more distributed.
Towns scored 19.
Anunoby scored 17.
Shamet scored 16.
Bridges scored 15.
Brunson scored 15.
McBride scored 11.
Robinson, Kolek and others added further production.
This balance made New York much harder to defend.
The Knicks did not need one player to carry the offense.
What the Bench Production Shows
Bench scoring can become extremely important in playoff basketball.
New York’s reserves supplied several meaningful contributions.
Shamet scored 16.
McBride scored 11.
Robinson scored eight.
Kolek scored eight.
Dadiet scored six.
Alvarado scored four.
Clarkson scored three.
Hukporti scored two.
That is considerable depth.
Cleveland’s bench produced less scoring overall, with Bryant leading the group at 10 points.
The difference meant Cleveland could not rely on its reserves to reduce the pressure created by New York’s starters.
Series Context
Game 4 was the final chapter of a four-game Eastern Conference Finals series.
The results were:
| Game | Result |
| Game 1 | Knicks 115, Cavaliers 104 OT |
| Game 2 | Knicks 109, Cavaliers 93 |
| Game 3 | Cavaliers 121, Knicks 108 |
| Game 4 | Knicks 130, Cavaliers 93 |
Cleveland managed to win Game 3, preventing a sweep at that point.
However, New York responded decisively in Game 4.
The final 130-93 result completed the 4-0 series victory.
The official NBA recap also highlighted New York’s 11-game postseason winning streak and Jalen Brunson’s Eastern Conference Finals MVP award following the sweep.
What These Player Stats Say About the Knicks
The strongest conclusion from the game is that New York won as a complete team.
The Knicks did not depend on one statistical category.
They combined:
- 49 percent field-goal shooting
- 44 percent three-point shooting
- 60 rebounds
- 33 assists
- 15 steals
- 20 offensive rebounds
- Only 13 turnovers
That combination is difficult for any opponent to overcome.
The most impressive feature is balance.
Towns controlled the interior.
Anunoby contributed on both ends.
Hart created possessions through rebounding and passing.
Brunson organized the offense.
Bridges supplied scoring and playmaking.
Shamet and McBride gave the bench major perimeter production.
This explains why the Knicks were able to win by 37 points even though their leading scorer had only 19 points.
What These Player Stats Say About the Cavaliers
Cleveland’s numbers reveal a very different story.
Mitchell was excellent as an individual scorer.
Mobley provided 15 points and four assists.
Harden made eight of nine free throws.
Bryant gave the bench 10 points.
Yet the Cavaliers lacked enough collective efficiency.
The team shot only 42 percent from the field and 28 percent from three.
The 22 turnovers were damaging.
The 33 total rebounds were especially problematic against a Knicks team that collected 60.
Cleveland’s 21 assists also showed less offensive distribution than New York.
In a playoff environment, these differences become magnified.
Key Statistical Takeaways
Several numbers summarize the game particularly well.
37-point margin
New York won 130-93.
That is a 37-point difference in the final score.
27-rebound advantage
The Knicks grabbed 60 rebounds compared with Cleveland’s 33.
14-offensive-rebound advantage
New York collected 20 offensive rebounds while Cleveland had only six.
Nine fewer turnovers
The Knicks committed 13 turnovers compared with Cleveland’s 22.
Eight more made threes
New York made 19 three-pointers compared with 11 for Cleveland.
12 more assists
The Knicks recorded 33 assists while the Cavaliers had 21.
Six double-digit scorers
New York had six players score at least 10 points.
That depth was one of the clearest differences between the teams.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who led the Cavaliers in scoring against the Knicks?
Donovan Mitchell led Cleveland with 31 points. He shot 9-of-18 from the field, 5-of-9 from three-point range and 8-of-10 from the free-throw line.
Who was the Knicks’ leading scorer?
Karl-Anthony Towns led New York with 19 points. He also grabbed 14 rebounds and shot 8-of-11 from the field.
What was the final score between the Knicks and Cavaliers?
The Knicks defeated the Cavaliers 130-93 in Game 4 of the Eastern Conference Finals.
How many rebounds did the Knicks have?
New York recorded 60 total rebounds, including 20 offensive rebounds and 40 defensive rebounds.
How many turnovers did the Cavaliers commit?
Cleveland committed 22 turnovers, nine more than New York’s 13 turnovers.
Who had the best three-point shooting performance for the Knicks?
Landry Shamet had the perfect three-point performance among the listed Knicks players, making all four of his attempts from beyond the arc. Karl-Anthony Towns also went 3-of-3 from three-point range.
Conclusion
The cleveland cavaliers vs knicks match player stats from Game 4 show why the Knicks were able to finish the Eastern Conference Finals with such a convincing victory.
New York’s success came from collective execution rather than dependence on a single scorer. Karl-Anthony Towns delivered 19 points and 14 rebounds, OG Anunoby added 17 points and seven rebounds, and Landry Shamet produced 16 points with four made three-pointers.
Josh Hart’s 11 rebounds and six assists were also important, while Jalen Brunson and Mikal Bridges each contributed 15 points and five assists.
For Cleveland, Donovan Mitchell’s 31 points stood out as the biggest individual scoring performance. Evan Mobley added 15 points, while James Harden scored 12 and made eight of nine free throws.
However, the team statistics favored New York decisively.
The Knicks shot better from the field and from three-point range. They dominated the rebounding battle 60-33, produced 33 assists, forced 15 steals and committed nine fewer turnovers.
The 20-6 advantage in offensive rebounds was especially important because it gave New York repeated second-chance opportunities.
Ultimately, the 130-93 result was a reflection of sustained team efficiency. The Knicks controlled shooting, possession, rebounding and ball movement across all four quarters. Cleveland’s individual scoring was not enough to overcome that collective advantage.
For readers analyzing cleveland cavaliers vs knicks match player stats, the most useful lesson is to look beyond the leading scorer. The full box score shows that New York won because more players contributed, more possessions were controlled and more opportunities were converted.
The four-game series ended with New York winning 4-0, while Game 4 provided the clearest statistical example of the Knicks’ depth and efficiency.
