Dallas Cowboys vs Philadelphia Eagles Match Player Stats
The dallas cowboys vs philadelphia eagles match player stats from the November 24, 2025 meeting tell a much more interesting story than the 24-21 final score alone. Philadelphia entered the game with an 8-3 record and a strong 4-2 road mark, while Dallas came in at 5-5-1 and 3-1-1 at home. Despite Philadelphia taking a 21-7 lead into the fourth quarter, Dallas produced a decisive late surge and finished with a 24-21 victory.
The box score shows two offenses that won in very different ways. Dallas relied heavily on passing efficiency and explosive receiving plays, while Philadelphia generated production through Jalen Hurts’ dual-threat ability and a pair of rushing touchdowns. Dallas ultimately had the stronger total yardage profile, with 354 passing yards and 125 rushing yards, compared with Philadelphia’s 289 passing yards and 63 rushing yards.
This breakdown examines the most important player statistics from the game, including passing, rushing, receiving, turnovers, defense, special teams, and the statistical factors that shaped the result.
Game Overview
The matchup was played on November 24, 2025, with Dallas defeating Philadelphia 24-21.
| Game Detail | Statistic |
| Matchup | Dallas Cowboys vs. Philadelphia Eagles |
| Date | November 24, 2025 |
| Final Score | Dallas Cowboys 24, Philadelphia Eagles 21 |
| Philadelphia Record | 8-3 |
| Philadelphia Away Record | 4-2 |
| Dallas Record | 5-5-1 |
| Dallas Home Record | 3-1-1 |
| Game ID | 401772890 |
The scoring pattern is particularly important.
Philadelphia scored 14 points in the first quarter and another seven in the second. Dallas answered with seven points in the second quarter, seven in the third, and 10 in the fourth.
Quarter-by-Quarter Score
| Quarter | Philadelphia Eagles | Dallas Cowboys |
| 1st | 14 | 0 |
| 2nd | 7 | 7 |
| 3rd | 0 | 7 |
| 4th | 0 | 10 |
| Final | 21 | 24 |
The game therefore developed in two distinct phases. Philadelphia controlled the opening half, but Dallas gradually changed the statistical balance and finished stronger.
dallas cowboys vs philadelphia eagles match player stats: Passing
Quarterback production was one of the clearest differences between the two teams.
Jalen Hurts completed 27 of 39 passes for 289 yards, while Dak Prescott completed 23 of 36 passes for 354 yards. Prescott attempted three fewer passes but produced 65 more passing yards.
Quarterback Comparison
| Player | Comp/Att | Passing Yards | Average | TD | INT | Sacks | QBR | Rating |
| Jalen Hurts | 27/39 | 289 | 7.4 | 1 | 0 | 1-13 | 50.5 | 99.2 |
| Dak Prescott | 23/36 | 354 | 9.8 | 2 | 1 | 1-6 | 60.6 | 103.2 |
Prescott’s 354 passing yards were a major part of Dallas’ offensive success. His 9.8 yards per attempt also indicates that the Cowboys were creating more yardage per passing attempt than Philadelphia.
Hurts, however, protected the football through the air. He threw no interceptions and posted a 99.2 passer rating. His passing line was efficient, but Philadelphia did not receive the same level of rushing support or explosive passing production that Dallas generated.
Prescott threw one interception, so his performance was not flawless. However, his two touchdown passes and 354 yards helped compensate for the turnover.
Dak Prescott’s Impact
Prescott completed 23 passes on 36 attempts. His 354 yards represented the biggest passing total in the game.
The most important part of his statistical profile was not simply the yardage total. Dallas also averaged 9.8 yards per attempt, which shows how effectively the Cowboys turned completed passes into meaningful gains.
Prescott was also credited with one rushing touchdown, giving him three total touchdowns in the game when his passing and rushing production are considered together.
Jalen Hurts’ Impact
Hurts completed 27 of 39 passes for 289 yards and one passing touchdown without an interception.
His 50.5 QBR was lower than Prescott’s 60.6, while his 99.2 passer rating was also slightly below Prescott’s 103.2.
However, evaluating Hurts only as a passer would miss an important part of his contribution. He also rushed seven times for 33 yards and two touchdowns. Those rushing scores were a major component of Philadelphia’s 21 points.
Dallas Rushing Performance
Dallas finished with 31 rushing attempts for 125 yards, averaging 4.0 yards per carry.
The Cowboys’ rushing attack was led by Javonte Williams.
| Player | Carries | Yards | Average | TD |
| Javonte Williams | 20 | 87 | 4.4 | 0 |
| Malik Davis | 3 | 24 | 8.0 | 0 |
| Dak Prescott | 5 | 9 | 1.8 | 1 |
| KaVontae Turpin | 2 | 4 | 2.0 | 0 |
| Jake Ferguson | 1 | 1 | 1.0 | 0 |
| Team | 31 | 125 | 4.0 | 1 |
Williams received 20 carries, which was by far the largest rushing workload on either team. His 87 yards at 4.4 yards per carry gave Dallas a dependable ground component to complement Prescott’s passing.
Malik Davis was even more efficient on a smaller sample, producing 24 yards on three carries for an 8.0-yard average.
Prescott’s five carries produced only nine yards, but one of those carries resulted in a touchdown. That distinction matters because rushing efficiency and rushing scoring impact are not always the same thing.
Philadelphia Rushing Performance
Philadelphia’s rushing production was considerably lower.
The Eagles recorded 18 rushing attempts for 63 yards, averaging 3.5 yards per carry.
| Player | Carries | Yards | Average | TD |
| Jalen Hurts | 7 | 33 | 4.7 | 2 |
| Saquon Barkley | 10 | 22 | 2.2 | 0 |
| Tank Bigsby | 1 | 8 | 8.0 | 0 |
| Team | 18 | 63 | 3.5 | 2 |
Hurts was Philadelphia’s most productive runner by both yardage and scoring impact. His 33 yards and two touchdowns provided a large portion of the Eagles’ rushing value.
Saquon Barkley carried the ball 10 times but managed only 22 yards, averaging 2.2 yards per attempt. That was a significant limitation for Philadelphia because the Eagles could not consistently generate rushing yardage from their primary running back.
The difference between the teams is clear. Dallas produced 125 rushing yards, while Philadelphia managed 63. That created a 62-yard advantage for the Cowboys on the ground.
Receiving Stats: Dallas Cowboys
Dallas’ receiving group produced the most explosive individual numbers in the game.
| Player | Receptions | Yards | Average | TD |
| George Pickens | 9 | 146 | 16.2 | 1 |
| CeeDee Lamb | 4 | 75 | 18.8 | 0 |
| Jake Ferguson | 5 | 60 | 12.0 | 0 |
| KaVontae Turpin | 1 | 48 | 48.0 | 0 |
| Javonte Williams | 2 | 14 | 7.0 | 0 |
| Hunter Luepke | 1 | 7 | 7.0 | 0 |
| Brevyn Spann-Ford | 1 | 4 | 4.0 | 1 |
| Luke Schoonmaker | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ryan Flournoy | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Team | 23 | 354 | 15.4 | 2 |
George Pickens Leads Dallas
George Pickens was Dallas’ leading receiver by a wide margin.
He caught nine passes for 146 yards and one touchdown. His 16.2-yard average demonstrates that Dallas was not simply accumulating short completions. Pickens consistently turned his opportunities into significant gains.
His 146 receiving yards accounted for more than 40 percent of Dallas’ 354 passing yards.
That makes Pickens one of the most important statistical players in the entire matchup.
CeeDee Lamb Adds Explosive Efficiency
CeeDee Lamb caught four passes for 75 yards. His 18.8-yard average was actually higher than Pickens’ 16.2-yard average.
Although Lamb had fewer receptions, his catches produced substantial yardage. This gave Prescott multiple ways to attack the Philadelphia defense.
Jake Ferguson’s Supporting Role
Ferguson recorded five receptions for 60 yards.
His production was less explosive than Lamb or Pickens, but he provided a reliable middle layer in the passing game. Dallas did not need one receiver to carry the entire passing attack because several players contributed meaningful yardage.
KaVontae Turpin also produced a notable 48-yard reception despite catching only one pass.
Philadelphia Receiving Stats
Philadelphia’s passing game was led by A.J. Brown.
| Player | Receptions | Yards | Average | TD |
| A.J. Brown | 8 | 110 | 13.8 | 1 |
| DeVonta Smith | 6 | 89 | 14.8 | 0 |
| Saquon Barkley | 7 | 52 | 7.4 | 0 |
| Dallas Goedert | 2 | 20 | 10.0 | 0 |
| Grant Calcaterra | 1 | 8 | 8.0 | 0 |
| Darius Cooper | 2 | 7 | 3.5 | 0 |
| Xavier Gipson | 1 | 3 | 3.0 | 0 |
| Jahan Dotson | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Team | 27 | 289 | 10.7 | 1 |
A.J. Brown Sets the Pace
Brown caught eight passes for 110 yards and one touchdown.
He was Philadelphia’s only receiver to surpass 100 yards, and his 13.8-yard average shows that his production came from meaningful gains rather than purely short completions.
DeVonta Smith Provides a Strong Second Option
Smith caught six passes for 89 yards, averaging 14.8 yards per reception.
Together, Brown and Smith accounted for 199 receiving yards. That represents a substantial portion of Hurts’ 289 passing yards.
Barkley Contributes Through the Air
Barkley had seven receptions for 52 yards.
His receiving production was considerably better than his rushing output. That contrast is important when analyzing his overall contribution. Although he averaged only 2.2 yards per rushing attempt, his receiving work provided Philadelphia with another method of moving the ball.
Total Offensive Production
The overall offensive numbers help explain why Dallas was able to recover from the early deficit.
| Category | Philadelphia | Dallas |
| Passing Yards | 289 | 354 |
| Rushing Yards | 63 | 125 |
| Total Listed Yardage | 352 | 479 |
| Rushing Attempts | 18 | 31 |
| Passing Completions | 27 | 23 |
| Passing Attempts | 39 | 36 |
| Passing TDs | 1 | 2 |
| Rushing TDs | 2 | 1 |
| Interceptions Thrown | 0 | 1 |
Dallas held a substantial advantage in the combined passing and rushing numbers.
The Cowboys generated 354 passing yards and 125 rushing yards. Philadelphia produced 289 passing yards and 63 rushing yards.
That is a difference of 127 yards in the listed passing and rushing totals.
This is one of the strongest statistical reasons to view Dallas’ comeback as more than a late scoring flurry. The Cowboys had greater overall offensive production across the game.
Turnovers and Fumbles
Turnovers were another important part of the matchup.
Philadelphia Turnovers
Philadelphia recorded two fumbles and lost both.
| Player/Team | Fumbles | Lost | Recoveries |
| Saquon Barkley | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Xavier Gipson | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Zack Baun | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Team | 2 | 2 | 1 |
The two lost fumbles were particularly costly because Philadelphia finished the game without an interception thrown by Hurts. Protecting the football through the passing game did not prevent the Eagles from suffering turnover damage elsewhere.
Dallas Turnovers
Dallas also recorded two fumbles, but only one was lost.
| Player/Team | Fumbles | Lost | Recoveries |
| KaVontae Turpin | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Jake Ferguson | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Trent Sieg | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kenneth Murray Jr. | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Team | 2 | 1 | 2 |
Dallas also threw one interception, meaning both teams had multiple turnover events affecting the game.
However, Philadelphia lost two fumbles, while Dallas lost one fumble and also threw one interception. The overall turnover picture was therefore competitive rather than overwhelmingly one-sided.
Defensive Player and Team Statistics
Neither defense produced a huge sack total.
Both teams recorded one sack.
| Defensive Category | Philadelphia | Dallas |
| Total Tackles | 70 | 59 |
| Solo Tackles | 36 | 35 |
| Sacks | 1 | 1 |
| Tackles for Loss | 2 | 2 |
| Passes Defended | 4 | 3 |
| QB Hits | 6 | 6 |
Philadelphia recorded more total tackles, 70 compared with Dallas’ 59.
That number does not automatically mean the Eagles played better defense. Tackle totals are heavily influenced by how many defensive opportunities a team receives and how long opponents sustain drives.
Both teams had six quarterback hits and two tackles for loss. The pass-rush production was therefore fairly balanced.
Philadelphia Interception
Reed Blankenship recorded Philadelphia’s only interception.
He finished with one interception and no return yards.
That play contributed to Philadelphia’s ability to create a turnover through the air, while Dallas did not record an interception of Hurts.
Special Teams Statistics
Special teams also played a role in the statistical profile.
Kick Returns
Philadelphia’s Will Shipley returned four kicks for 106 yards, averaging 26.5 yards per return. His longest return was 30 yards.
Dallas’ KaVontae Turpin returned three kicks for 85 yards, averaging 28.3 yards per return. His longest return was 33 yards.
| Player | Returns | Yards | Average | Long |
| Will Shipley | 4 | 106 | 26.5 | 30 |
| KaVontae Turpin | 3 | 85 | 28.3 | 33 |
Turpin had the higher average and longer return, while Shipley accumulated more total return yards because he had one additional return.
Punt Returns
Xavier Gipson recorded two punt returns for 19 yards, averaging 9.5 yards.
Turpin also returned two punts but managed only one yard, producing a 0.5-yard average.
That contrast shows why return statistics should be evaluated separately for kickoffs and punts.
Kicking Comparison
Dallas received six points from Brandon Aubrey’s kicking production.
Aubrey converted one of two field-goal attempts, with a long of 42 yards. He also made all three extra-point attempts.
Philadelphia’s Jake Elliott went 0-for-1 on field goals but made all three extra-point attempts.
| Kicker | FG | FG % | Long | XP | Points |
| Brandon Aubrey | 1/2 | 50.0% | 42 | 3/3 | 6 |
| Jake Elliott | 0/1 | 0.0% | 0 | 3/3 | 3 |
The difference was three points in field-goal production.
Because the final margin was exactly three points, every scoring detail deserves attention. Dallas did not have perfect kicking efficiency, but its successful field goal supplied an important portion of the winning total.
Punting Comparison
Philadelphia’s Braden Mann punted five times for 250 yards.
His average was 50.0 yards, with three punts landing inside the 20-yard line. His longest punt traveled 58 yards.
Dallas’ Bryan Anger punted three times for 168 yards, averaging 56.0 yards. His longest punt was 62 yards, with one punt inside the 20.
| Punter | Punts | Yards | Average | Inside 20 | Long |
| Braden Mann | 5 | 250 | 50.0 | 3 | 58 |
| Bryan Anger | 3 | 168 | 56.0 | 1 | 62 |
Anger had the stronger average and longest punt, while Mann had more attempts and more punts placed inside the 20.
What the Stats Reveal About the Game
Looking only at the final score can make the game appear like a straightforward comeback. The underlying numbers provide more detail.
1. Dallas Won the Yardage Battle
Dallas’ 354 passing yards and 125 rushing yards gave the Cowboys a major statistical advantage in offensive yardage.
Philadelphia’s offense produced 289 passing yards and only 63 rushing yards.
The 62-yard rushing advantage for Dallas was especially important because it reduced the burden on Prescott to win every possession through the air.
2. Dallas Created More Passing Explosiveness
Prescott averaged 9.8 yards per attempt compared with Hurts’ 7.4.
Dallas also had three receivers with at least 60 receiving yards: Pickens, Lamb, and Ferguson.
Philadelphia had two receivers above 50 yards, Brown and Smith, while Barkley added 52 receiving yards.
The Cowboys therefore spread significant production across several targets.
3. Philadelphia Was More Dependent on Hurts’ Rushing
Hurts rushed for 33 yards and two touchdowns.
Philadelphia’s other two listed rushing contributors combined for 30 yards. This means Hurts accounted for more than half of the team’s rushing yardage among its listed individual runners.
His rushing touchdowns were critical to Philadelphia’s scoring, but the offense lacked the same ground balance Dallas displayed.
4. Barkley’s Rushing Efficiency Was a Problem
Barkley had 10 carries for only 22 yards.
His 2.2-yard average was the lowest among Philadelphia’s listed rushing contributors.
That does not mean his overall game was ineffective because he also caught seven passes for 52 yards. Still, Philadelphia needed more efficiency on the ground to complement Hurts.
5. Turnovers Helped Keep the Game Competitive
Philadelphia lost two fumbles.
Dallas lost one fumble and threw one interception.
The turnovers did not belong exclusively to one side, but Philadelphia’s two lost fumbles were particularly damaging given the team’s early lead and inability to score in the second half.
The Fourth-Quarter Turning Point
The scoring sequence is one of the most useful ways to understand this matchup.
Philadelphia entered the fourth quarter with a 21-14 advantage after Dallas had already scored seven unanswered points in the third quarter.
Dallas then added 10 points in the fourth quarter while Philadelphia failed to score.
That produced the final 24-21 result.
The comeback therefore was not built around one statistical category alone. Dallas combined continued offensive production with a complete scoring shutdown of Philadelphia after halftime.
Philadelphia scored 21 points in the first two quarters and zero in the final two.
Dallas scored 14 points in the first two quarters and 14 in the final two.
That split tells a powerful story about game momentum and second-half execution.
Most Important Individual Performances
Several players stand out when the complete statistical picture is considered.
Dak Prescott
Prescott finished with 354 passing yards, two passing touchdowns, and one interception. He also added a rushing touchdown.
His 103.2 passer rating was the highest quarterback rating in the game.
George Pickens
Pickens recorded nine catches for 146 yards and one touchdown.
His combination of volume and efficiency made him Dallas’ most productive receiver.
CeeDee Lamb
Lamb produced 75 yards on four receptions.
His 18.8-yard average was the highest receiving average among Dallas players with multiple listed receptions.
Jalen Hurts
Hurts passed for 289 yards and one touchdown without an interception. He also ran for 33 yards and two touchdowns.
His dual-threat production was a major reason Philadelphia reached 21 points.
A.J. Brown
Brown caught eight passes for 110 yards and one touchdown.
He was Philadelphia’s leading receiver and one of the game’s most productive offensive players.
Javonte Williams
Williams carried the ball 20 times for 87 yards.
He provided Dallas with the workload and steady rushing production necessary to complement Prescott’s passing attack.
A Deeper Look at Efficiency
Raw totals are useful, but efficiency often provides better context.
Prescott averaged 9.8 yards per passing attempt, compared with Hurts at 7.4. That difference of 2.4 yards per attempt is substantial over a full game.
Dallas also averaged 4.0 yards per rushing attempt, compared with Philadelphia’s 3.5.
The Cowboys therefore had an advantage in both listed passing efficiency and rushing efficiency.
Philadelphia’s strongest efficiency advantage came from Hurts’ rushing average of 4.7 yards per carry and the scoring value of his two rushing touchdowns.
This creates an interesting contrast. Dallas was statistically stronger as a complete offense, while Philadelphia received exceptional situational value from its quarterback’s legs.
Why the Final Score Can Be Misleading
A 24-21 score suggests an extremely close contest, and it was close on the scoreboard.
But the underlying production was not identical.
Dallas produced substantially more passing yardage and rushing yardage. Philadelphia’s advantage came from scoring early and converting its offensive opportunities into touchdowns.
This is an important lesson when evaluating match player statistics. A team can lose the overall yardage battle and still lead for most of a game if it finishes drives efficiently.
Likewise, a team can dominate yardage and still need a late comeback because early possessions did not produce enough points.
That is exactly why player statistics should be viewed alongside scoring progression.
How to Read These Player Stats Correctly
For readers analyzing NFL box scores, several principles are useful.
Do Not Judge a Quarterback by Passing Yards Alone
Prescott had more passing yards, but he also threw one interception.
Hurts had fewer passing yards but did not throw an interception and scored two rushing touchdowns.
The better comparison therefore includes passing efficiency, turnovers, rushing production, and touchdowns.
Separate Volume From Efficiency
Pickens had nine receptions for 146 yards.
Lamb had four receptions for 75 yards.
Pickens had more total production, but Lamb averaged more yards per catch.
Both statistics tell different parts of the story.
Look at Team Context
Barkley’s 22 rushing yards may look disappointing by itself. His seven receptions for 52 yards provide additional context.
Similarly, Prescott’s nine rushing yards appear modest, but one of those rushing plays resulted in a touchdown.
Individual numbers become more meaningful when connected to how the team used each player.
Key Statistical Takeaways
The most important numbers from the matchup can be summarized as follows:
- Dallas finished with 354 passing yards.
- Philadelphia finished with 289 passing yards.
- Dallas rushed for 125 yards.
- Philadelphia rushed for 63 yards.
- Dak Prescott threw for two touchdowns and 354 yards.
- Jalen Hurts threw for 289 yards and added two rushing touchdowns.
- George Pickens led all receivers with 146 yards.
- A.J. Brown led Philadelphia with 110 receiving yards.
- Javonte Williams led Dallas with 87 rushing yards.
- Saquon Barkley averaged only 2.2 yards per rushing attempt.
- Philadelphia lost two fumbles.
- Dallas lost one fumble and threw one interception.
- Both defenses recorded one sack.
- Dallas scored 10 fourth-quarter points.
- Philadelphia scored zero points in the second half.
- Brandon Aubrey made one field goal for Dallas.
- Jake Elliott missed his only field-goal attempt.
- Dallas won the game 24-21.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the final score between the Dallas Cowboys and Philadelphia Eagles?
The Dallas Cowboys defeated the Philadelphia Eagles 24-21 on November 24, 2025.
Who had more passing yards in the game?
Dak Prescott had more passing yards. He completed 23 of 36 attempts for 354 yards, while Jalen Hurts completed 27 of 39 for 289 yards.
Who was the leading receiver?
George Pickens was the leading receiver in the game with nine receptions for 146 yards and one touchdown.
How many rushing touchdowns did Jalen Hurts score?
Jalen Hurts scored two rushing touchdowns and finished with 33 rushing yards on seven attempts.
How many rushing yards did Saquon Barkley have?
Barkley rushed 10 times for 22 yards, averaging 2.2 yards per carry. He also caught seven passes for 52 yards.
Which team had more total offensive production?
Dallas had the stronger combined passing and rushing production, recording 354 passing yards and 125 rushing yards compared with Philadelphia’s 289 passing yards and 63 rushing yards.
Conclusion
The dallas cowboys vs philadelphia eagles match player stats show why this 24-21 result was more than a simple fourth-quarter comeback.
Dallas had the stronger overall offensive yardage profile, with 354 passing yards and 125 rushing yards. Dak Prescott delivered 354 passing yards and two passing touchdowns, while George Pickens produced 146 receiving yards. Javonte Williams also gave the Cowboys a reliable rushing foundation with 87 yards on 20 carries.
Philadelphia had its own standout performances. Jalen Hurts passed for 289 yards without an interception and added two rushing touchdowns. A.J. Brown recorded 110 receiving yards and a touchdown, while DeVonta Smith added 89 yards.
The biggest statistical differences came from Dallas’ stronger rushing output, greater passing yardage, higher yards per passing attempt, and second-half scoring. Philadelphia scored 21 points before halftime but was held scoreless during the final two quarters. Dallas, meanwhile, finished with 14 points in the second half and turned a 21-14 deficit entering the fourth quarter into a three-point victory.
For anyone studying this matchup, the most useful lesson is to avoid relying on one headline statistic. Quarterback numbers, rushing efficiency, receiving production, turnovers, defensive pressure, special teams, and scoring by quarter all contribute to the complete picture.
The dallas cowboys vs philadelphia eagles match player stats ultimately describe a game in which Philadelphia started faster, but Dallas produced the more balanced statistical performance when the full 60 minutes were considered.
