Washington Commanders vs Chargers Match Player Stats
The washington commanders vs chargers match player stats from October 6, 2025, tell a much clearer story than the final score alone. Washington defeated Los Angeles 27-10, but the most important details are found in the individual performances. Jayden Daniels produced 231 passing yards without an interception, Jacory Croskey-Merritt rushed for 111 yards and two touchdowns, and Deebo Samuel Sr. added 96 receiving yards and a touchdown. On defense, Washington created consistent pressure, recording five sacks and nine quarterback hits while holding the Chargers to 10 points.
The Chargers moved the ball in several areas, particularly on the ground, but their offense struggled to turn production into points. Justin Herbert completed 22 of 29 passes for 166 yards, one touchdown and one interception, while also rushing for 60 yards. Los Angeles finished with 155 rushing yards and 210 receiving yards, yet the team could not match Washington’s efficiency in the most important moments.
This breakdown examines the player statistics behind the 27-10 result, explains which performances mattered most, and shows why Washington’s balance between passing, rushing, turnovers and defensive pressure proved decisive.
Game Overview
The matchup took place on October 6, 2025, with both teams entering the game at 3-2. Washington was 1-2 away from home, while Los Angeles had a 2-1 home record.
Washington ultimately controlled the scoreboard from start to finish, winning 27-10.
Final Score
| Team | Score | Record |
| Washington Commanders | 27 | 3-2 |
| Los Angeles Chargers | 10 | 3-2 |
The 17-point margin is significant because neither team was completely ineffective offensively. Los Angeles actually finished with 365 combined passing and rushing yards, compared with Washington’s 394 total yards based on the supplied statistics.
The difference was how those yards translated into scoring opportunities.
Washington produced two rushing touchdowns and one receiving touchdown. Los Angeles scored only one receiving touchdown. Washington also won the turnover battle in practical terms, recording an interception while forcing a lost fumble, while the Chargers did not intercept a pass.
washington commanders vs chargers match player stats
The central figures from the game show Washington’s biggest strengths were quarterback efficiency, explosive rushing, productive receiving and defensive pressure.
Jayden Daniels finished 15 of 26 for 231 yards with one touchdown and no interceptions. His 8.9 yards per attempt was particularly important because Washington did not need a huge volume of completions to generate meaningful passing production.
Jacory Croskey-Merritt was the game’s standout rushing performer. He carried the ball 14 times for 111 yards, averaging 7.9 yards per attempt and scoring twice.
Deebo Samuel Sr. was the leading Washington receiver with eight catches for 96 yards and one touchdown on 11 targets.
Defensively, Washington recorded five sacks. Frankie Luvu led the team with two sacks, while Dorance Armstrong added 1.5 and Von Miller and Jer’Zhan Newton each recorded one.
The Chargers had individual bright spots, especially Herbert’s rushing production and Keenan Allen’s receiving work, but the team did not consistently convert those contributions into points.
Jayden Daniels’ Passing Performance
Jayden Daniels completed 15 of 26 attempts for 231 yards, one touchdown and zero interceptions.
That works out to a completion rate of approximately 57.7 percent.
His 231 yards came at an impressive 8.9 yards per attempt. That number indicates Washington was generating meaningful yardage when Daniels connected with his receivers rather than relying purely on short throws.
His passer rating was listed at 100.0, while his QBR was 74.9.
Those numbers provide useful context for evaluating the quarterback’s performance. Daniels was not asked to throw the ball at an extreme volume, but he was efficient enough to keep the offense moving and avoided the type of turnover that could have changed the game’s momentum.
Daniels’ Key Passing Numbers
| Statistic | Jayden Daniels |
| Completions/Attempts | 15/26 |
| Passing Yards | 231 |
| Yards per Attempt | 8.9 |
| Touchdowns | 1 |
| Interceptions | 0 |
| Sacks | 1 |
| Sack Yards Lost | 5 |
| QBR | 74.9 |
| Passer Rating | 100.0 |
The Daniels also contributed 39 rushing yards on eight carries.
That dual-threat element matters because it forces a defense to account for the quarterback beyond the passing game. Even without a rushing touchdown, his 4.9 yards per carry added another layer to Washington’s offensive attack.
Jacory Croskey-Merritt Was the Rushing Difference-Maker
If one player best represents Washington’s control of the game, it is Jacory Croskey-Merritt.
He finished with:
- 14 rushing attempts
- 111 rushing yards
- 7.9 yards per carry
- 2 rushing touchdowns
- 27-yard longest run
A 7.9-yard rushing average over 14 attempts is outstanding efficiency.
More importantly, his production came with enough volume to matter. This was not simply one long run inflating a small workload. Croskey-Merritt consistently generated yardage and crossed the goal line twice.
His 27-yard longest run shows he had explosive-play ability, but the overall average of 7.9 yards per attempt demonstrates that his performance was not dependent on a single breakaway.
He also caught two passes for 39 yards.
That gave him 150 yards of combined rushing and receiving production, making him one of the most influential offensive players in the matchup.
Washington’s Rushing Production
Washington finished with 28 rushing attempts for 163 yards, averaging 5.8 yards per carry.
| Player | Carries | Yards | Average | TD | Long |
| Jacory Croskey-Merritt | 14 | 111 | 7.9 | 2 | 27 |
| Jayden Daniels | 8 | 39 | 4.9 | 0 | Not listed |
| Chris Rodriguez Jr. | 5 | 7 | 1.4 | 0 | Not listed |
| Jeremy McNichols | 1 | 6 | 6.0 | 0 | Not listed |
| Team | 28 | 163 | 5.8 | 2 | 27 |
The distribution is revealing.
Croskey-Merritt accounted for more than two-thirds of Washington’s rushing yards. Daniels supplied another 39 yards, giving Washington two major sources of rushing production.
That balance helped reduce the pressure on Daniels to win the game entirely through the air.
Deebo Samuel Sr. Led Washington’s Receiving Attack
Deebo Samuel Sr. recorded eight receptions for 96 yards and one touchdown.
He was targeted 11 times, meaning he accounted for nearly half of Washington’s 23 total targets.
His average of 12.0 yards per reception shows that Washington was not simply using him for short possession routes. His longest reception covered 22 yards.
Washington Receiving Numbers
| Player | Receptions | Yards | Average | TD | Long | Targets |
| Deebo Samuel Sr. | 8 | 96 | 12.0 | 1 | 22 | 11 |
| Luke McCaffrey | 1 | 50 | 50.0 | 0 | 50 | Not listed |
| Jacory Croskey-Merritt | 2 | 39 | 19.5 | 0 | Not listed | Not listed |
| Jaylin Lane | 1 | 16 | 16.0 | 0 | Not listed | Not listed |
| Jeremy McNichols | 1 | 12 | 12.0 | 0 | Not listed | Not listed |
| John Bates | 1 | 9 | 9.0 | 0 | Not listed | Not listed |
| Tay Martin | 1 | 9 | 9.0 | 0 | Not listed | Not listed |
| Team | 15 | 231 | 15.4 | 1 | 50 | 23 |
Luke McCaffrey deserves special attention despite catching only one pass.
His single reception went for 50 yards.
That means Washington had two different forms of receiving production. Samuel provided volume and consistency, while McCaffrey supplied a major explosive play.
This combination is valuable because an offense becomes difficult to defend when it can move the chains through one player and suddenly create a large gain through another.
Justin Herbert’s Performance
Justin Herbert completed 22 of 29 passes for 166 yards, one touchdown and one interception.
His completion rate was approximately 75.9 percent, which looks strong on its own.
However, completion percentage does not tell the entire story.
Herbert averaged only 5.7 yards per attempt. He also took four sacks for 24 yards and finished with a passer rating of 86.3 and a QBR of 51.7.
Herbert’s Passing Numbers
| Statistic | Justin Herbert |
| Completions/Attempts | 22/29 |
| Completion Rate | 75.9% |
| Passing Yards | 166 |
| Yards per Attempt | 5.7 |
| Touchdowns | 1 |
| Interceptions | 1 |
| Sacks | 4 |
| Sack Yards Lost | 24 |
| QBR | 51.7 |
| Passer Rating | 86.3 |
Herbert’s statistics show an interesting contrast.
He was accurate, but Washington limited the efficiency of those completions. The Chargers completed many passes without generating the same downfield impact Washington achieved through Daniels.
The four sacks were also costly.
A sack is not just a negative passing play. It can affect field position, down-and-distance situations and scoring opportunities. Washington’s pass rush repeatedly created those disadvantages.
Trey Lance Added Efficiency in Limited Action
Trey Lance completed three of four passes for 44 yards.
His 11.0 yards per attempt was higher than Herbert’s 5.7, although the sample was far too small to make a meaningful direct comparison between the two quarterbacks.
Lance also rushed once for 11 yards.
His listed passer rating was 110.4 and his QBR was 50.4.
These numbers illustrate why efficiency statistics need context. A quarterback completing three of four attempts can post excellent rate statistics, but four passing attempts do not provide enough volume to evaluate a complete performance.
Los Angeles Rushing Attack
One of the more surprising aspects of the game was Los Angeles’ rushing production.
The Chargers finished with 27 rushing attempts for 155 yards, averaging 5.7 yards per carry.
That is strong production on a per-carry basis.
Yet the Chargers did not score a rushing touchdown.
| Player | Carries | Yards | Average | TD | Long |
| Justin Herbert | 4 | 60 | 15.0 | 0 | Not listed |
| Omarion Hampton | 12 | 44 | 3.7 | 0 | Not listed |
| Kimani Vidal | 4 | 18 | 4.5 | 0 | Not listed |
| Hassan Haskins | 5 | 13 | 2.6 | 0 | Not listed |
| Trey Lance | 1 | 11 | 11.0 | 0 | Not listed |
| Quentin Johnston | 1 | 9 | 9.0 | 0 | Not listed |
| Team | 27 | 155 | 5.7 | 0 | 41 |
Herbert’s 60 rushing yards stand out.
He averaged 15.0 yards per carry, meaning the quarterback was actually Los Angeles’ most efficient ball carrier by average.
Omarion Hampton received the most rushing attempts with 12, but he produced 44 yards, or 3.7 yards per carry.
The broader lesson is that overall rushing efficiency did not automatically translate into scoring success.
Chargers Receiving Leaders
Los Angeles recorded 25 receptions for 210 yards and one touchdown on 32 targets.
Keenan Allen led the team in receiving yardage with 58 yards from five catches.
Quentin Johnston caught four passes for 40 yards, while Ladd McConkey added four receptions for 39 yards and the Chargers’ only receiving touchdown.
Los Angeles Receiving Numbers
| Player | Receptions | Yards | Average | TD |
| Keenan Allen | 5 | 58 | 11.6 | 0 |
| Quentin Johnston | 4 | 40 | Not listed | 0 |
| Ladd McConkey | 4 | 39 | Not listed | 1 |
| Tyler Conklin | 2 | 30 | Not listed | 0 |
| Omarion Hampton | 6 | 26 | Not listed | 0 |
| Oronde Gadsden | 1 | 14 | Not listed | 0 |
| Hassan Haskins | 1 | 2 | Not listed | 0 |
| Kimani Vidal | 1 | 1 | Not listed | 0 |
| Team | 25 | 210 | 8.4 | 1 |
The distribution shows that Los Angeles had several players involved in the passing game.
Hampton led the team with six receptions, while Allen led in receiving yardage.
But the Chargers did not produce a single receiver with the same combination of volume and yardage that Samuel gave Washington.
Defensive Performance Changed the Game
The biggest statistical separation came on defense.
Washington recorded 74 tackles, 44 solo tackles, five sacks, six tackles for loss, four passes defended and nine quarterback hits.
Los Angeles recorded 59 tackles, 32 solo tackles, one sack, six tackles for loss, two passes defended and one quarterback hit.
The sack difference is particularly important.
Washington: 5 sacks
Los Angeles: 1 sack
That four-sack advantage represents a major difference in quarterback pressure.
Washington also generated nine quarterback hits compared with only one for Los Angeles.
That means Washington was not merely getting occasional pressure. The defensive front consistently affected the pocket.
Washington Defensive Leaders
Bobby Wagner led Washington with 14 tackles, including eight solo tackles.
Mike Sainristil recorded nine tackles, seven of them solo, along with two passes defended and one interception.
Quan Martin also made nine tackles, including six solo tackles.
Jeremy Reaves added seven tackles, with five solo.
Washington Defensive Leaders
| Player | Tackles | Solo | Other Key Stats |
| Bobby Wagner | 14 | 8 | Team tackle leader |
| Mike Sainristil | 9 | 7 | 2 PD, 1 INT |
| Quan Martin | 9 | 6 | Key tackle production |
| Jeremy Reaves | 7 | 5 | Strong defensive involvement |
Sainristil’s interception was especially important because Los Angeles did not record an interception of its own.
Turnovers can change the value of individual possessions dramatically. Even one interception can remove an offensive opportunity and potentially create a short field for the opponent.
Washington’s Pass Rush
Frankie Luvu led Washington with two sacks.
Dorance Armstrong recorded 1.5 sacks.
Von Miller recorded one sack.
Jer’Zhan Newton also recorded one sack.
The individual sack totals add to more than five because Armstrong’s 1.5 sacks combine with the other listed production to produce the five-sack team total according to the supplied statistics.
The broader point is that Washington’s pressure came from multiple defenders.
That makes the performance more significant than a game in which one player dominates the pass rush while everyone else contributes little.
Washington created pressure from different sources, making it harder for Los Angeles to neutralize one specific defender.
Los Angeles Defensive Leaders
Troy Dye led the Chargers with 11 tackles, including seven solo tackles and three tackles for loss.
Daiyan Henley added eight tackles.
Elijah Molden recorded five tackles, four of them solo.
Justin Eboigbe recorded four tackles, including three solo tackles and one sack.
The Chargers’ defensive numbers were not empty. They made tackles and generated six tackles for loss.
The main problem was pressure.
One sack and one quarterback hit were not enough to disrupt Washington’s passing attack consistently.
Daniels finished with 231 passing yards and did not throw an interception, giving Washington the cleaner quarterback performance.
Turnovers and Ball Security
Turnover statistics provide another useful way to understand the result.
Washington’s Jacory Croskey-Merritt had one fumble and lost it.
Washington also recorded a fumble recovery by Marshon Lattimore.
For Los Angeles, Quentin Johnston had one fumble and lost it, while Teair Tart recorded a fumble recovery.
Washington’s Mike Sainristil also recorded the game’s interception.
Los Angeles did not record an interception.
This means both teams had a lost fumble, but Washington had the additional interception.
That extra takeaway gave Washington an important advantage in possession efficiency.
Special Teams Statistics
Special teams did not dominate the game, but Washington was highly reliable in the kicking department.
Matt Gay converted both of his field-goal attempts, including a long of 36 yards. He also made all three extra-point attempts and finished with nine points.
Cameron Dicker made his only field-goal attempt, a 55-yard kick, and converted his extra point.
Kicking Comparison
| Kicker | FG | Long | Extra Points | Points |
| Matt Gay | 2/2 | 36 | 3/3 | 9 |
| Cameron Dicker | 1/1 | 55 | 1/1 | 4 |
Both kickers were perfect on their attempts.
The difference was volume. Washington created more scoring opportunities and therefore gave Gay more chances to contribute.
Washington’s Luke McCaffrey also returned three kickoffs for 92 yards, averaging 30.7 yards per return with a long of 40.
Los Angeles’ KeAndre Lambert-Smith had four kickoff returns for 88 yards, averaging 22.0 yards per return.
Punting Comparison
Tress Way punted twice for Washington, producing 101 total yards and a 50.5-yard average.
He recorded one punt inside the 20 and had a long of 53 yards.
JK Scott punted twice for Los Angeles for 96 total yards, averaging 48.0 yards per punt with a long of 54 yards.
Neither team recorded a punt return.
The numbers suggest both punters provided solid field-position production, although Washington’s average was slightly higher.
Why Washington Won
The final score becomes easier to understand when the major statistical categories are placed together.
1. Washington Created More Quarterback Pressure
Five sacks and nine quarterback hits gave Washington a clear defensive advantage.
Los Angeles recorded only one sack and one quarterback hit.
That is one of the largest differences in the supplied defensive statistics.
2. Washington Had the More Explosive Passing Attack
Daniels averaged 8.9 yards per attempt.
Herbert averaged 5.7.
Daniels threw for 231 yards despite attempting only 26 passes.
Herbert completed more passes, but his 166 yards came with lower average efficiency.
3. Croskey-Merritt Provided Two Touchdowns
The running back’s 111 rushing yards and two touchdowns gave Washington a reliable scoring foundation.
Los Angeles gained 155 rushing yards but scored zero rushing touchdowns.
That contrast demonstrates the difference between accumulating yardage and finishing possessions.
4. Washington Avoided an Interception
Daniels threw zero interceptions.
Herbert threw one.
When two teams are relatively close in overall yardage, turnover-free quarterback play can become especially valuable.
5. Washington Had Multiple Explosive Contributors
Samuel provided 96 receiving yards.
McCaffrey added a 50-yard reception.
Croskey-Merritt produced 111 rushing yards.
Daniels added 39 rushing yards.
The offense therefore did not rely on one type of play or one player.
What the Numbers Say About Offensive Efficiency
A common mistake when analyzing a football box score is to focus only on total yardage.
Los Angeles produced 155 rushing yards and 210 receiving yards, which is a respectable offensive output.
Yet the Chargers scored only 10 points.
Washington produced 163 rushing yards and 231 receiving yards, a total of 394 yards, and scored 27 points.
The difference suggests Washington was more effective at turning production into points.
That can happen because of several factors, including explosive plays, turnovers, field position, third-down execution and red-zone performance.
The supplied statistics do not include every situational category needed to calculate a full efficiency profile, so it would be inaccurate to claim a specific third-down or red-zone advantage without additional data.
What can be stated confidently is that Washington produced more touchdowns, generated more sacks and interceptions, and finished with the higher score.
For official league context and broader NFL statistical information, readers can consult the NFL official statistics and game information.
The Importance of Explosive Plays
Washington’s receiving statistics contain two excellent examples of explosive production.
Luke McCaffrey caught one pass for 50 yards.
Samuel’s longest reception was 22 yards.
Croskey-Merritt’s longest rush was 27 yards.
These plays matter because explosive gains can compress the number of plays an offense needs to reach scoring range.
Los Angeles also had explosive rushing production, including a 41-yard team rushing long and Herbert’s 60 rushing yards.
However, those gains did not lead to the same scoring output.
This is why individual big plays should always be evaluated alongside touchdowns, turnovers and overall offensive efficiency.
A Closer Look at the Quarterback Contrast
Daniels and Herbert produced very different statistical profiles.
Herbert completed 22 of 29 attempts, giving him a much higher completion percentage than Daniels.
Daniels, however, produced 231 passing yards on 26 attempts.
The difference is visible in yards per attempt:
- Daniels: 8.9
- Herbert: 5.7
Daniels also avoided an interception, while Herbert threw one.
The sack numbers add another layer.
Daniels was sacked once for five yards.
Herbert was sacked four times for 24 yards.
From an offensive perspective, that means Washington kept its quarterback cleaner and produced more yardage per passing attempt.
The statistics do not suggest that Herbert played poorly in every aspect. His 75.9 percent completion rate and 166 passing yards show that he was able to complete throws consistently.
The problem was that those completions did not generate enough overall offensive impact.
Player of the Game Candidates
Several players have a legitimate statistical case for being Washington’s most important performer.
Jacory Croskey-Merritt
His 111 rushing yards and two touchdowns make the strongest overall case.
He directly accounted for 12 points through touchdowns and consistently produced yardage.
Jayden Daniels
Daniels delivered 231 passing yards, one passing touchdown, zero interceptions and 39 rushing yards.
His clean passing performance was particularly important against a Chargers defense that needed to generate more pressure.
Deebo Samuel Sr.
Samuel recorded eight catches, 96 yards and a touchdown.
His 11 targets made him the primary receiving option in Washington’s offense.
Frankie Luvu
Luvu’s two sacks helped lead a Washington pass rush that recorded five sacks overall.
The game was not won by one player alone, but Croskey-Merritt has the strongest statistical case based on touchdowns and total offensive production.
What Los Angeles Can Take From the Numbers
The Chargers’ statistics show that the 10-point total did not come from a complete inability to move the ball.
The team produced:
- 155 rushing yards
- 210 receiving yards
- 25 receptions
- 22 completions from Herbert
- 60 rushing yards from Herbert
The biggest issue was converting production into a winning result.
The defensive side also needs attention.
Holding an opponent to one sack and one quarterback hit makes it difficult to consistently disrupt a mobile quarterback who is averaging 8.9 yards per pass attempt.
The Chargers did have six tackles for loss, which indicates some success in the front seven, but Washington’s overall offensive efficiency remained higher.
What Washington Can Take From the Numbers
Washington’s performance provides several encouraging signs.
First, Daniels protected the football.
Second, the rushing attack generated 163 yards at 5.8 yards per carry.
Third, Croskey-Merritt emerged as a major offensive factor.
Fourth, Samuel provided reliable receiving volume.
Fifth, the defense created five sacks and nine quarterback hits.
That combination is important because it reduces dependence on any single phase of the team.
Washington did not need Daniels to throw 40 or 50 passes.
It did not need the defense to produce a defensive touchdown.
It did not need the kicker to carry the scoring load.
Instead, the team generated contributions across offense, defense and special teams.
washington commanders vs chargers match player stats: Key Takeaways
The most useful way to read the box score is to connect individual statistics with the final result.
Washington’s biggest offensive advantage was efficiency.
Daniels averaged 8.9 yards per attempt, while Croskey-Merritt averaged 7.9 yards per carry.
Samuel caught eight passes for 96 yards and a touchdown.
McCaffrey’s 50-yard catch provided another explosive play.
Defensively, Washington’s five sacks and nine quarterback hits were perhaps the clearest team-level advantage.
The Chargers had solid rushing and completion numbers, but their offense struggled to turn those statistics into touchdowns.
Herbert’s 166 passing yards were also significantly below Daniels’ 231.
The final score of 27-10 therefore reflects more than one statistical category. It represents Washington’s stronger combination of explosive offense, quarterback protection, rushing touchdowns, turnover creation and pass-rush pressure.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who led Washington in rushing against the Chargers?
Jacory Croskey-Merritt led Washington with 111 rushing yards on 14 carries. He averaged 7.9 yards per carry and scored two touchdowns.
How many passing yards did Jayden Daniels have?
Jayden Daniels passed for 231 yards on 15 completions in 26 attempts. He threw one touchdown and no interceptions.
How did Justin Herbert perform against Washington?
Justin Herbert completed 22 of 29 passes for 166 yards, one touchdown and one interception. He also rushed four times for 60 yards.
Who was Washington’s leading receiver?
Deebo Samuel Sr. led Washington with eight receptions for 96 yards and one touchdown on 11 targets.
How many sacks did Washington record?
Washington recorded five team sacks. Frankie Luvu led the team with two sacks, while Dorance Armstrong recorded 1.5.
What was the final score?
Washington defeated the Los Angeles Chargers 27-10 on October 6, 2025.
Conclusion
The washington commanders vs chargers match player stats reveal a game in which Washington consistently converted its best opportunities into meaningful production.
Jayden Daniels provided efficient quarterback play with 231 passing yards, one touchdown and no interceptions. Jacory Croskey-Merritt supplied the game’s most productive rushing performance with 111 yards and two touchdowns. Deebo Samuel Sr. added 96 receiving yards and another touchdown, while Luke McCaffrey contributed a 50-yard reception.
The defensive numbers are just as important. Washington recorded five sacks and nine quarterback hits, compared with one sack and one quarterback hit for Los Angeles. Mike Sainristil added an interception, giving Washington another major advantage in the turnover department.
Los Angeles had respectable yardage totals and several productive individual performances. Herbert completed nearly 76 percent of his passes, the Chargers ran for 155 yards and Keenan Allen led the team with 58 receiving yards. But the offense scored only 10 points and failed to produce a rushing touchdown.
Ultimately, Washington’s advantage came from efficiency rather than simply accumulating yards. The Commanders combined explosive plays, strong rushing production, clean quarterback play, defensive pressure and timely scoring to secure the 27-10 victory.
