Texans vs Seahawks Match Player Stats

The texans vs seahawks match player stats from October 20, 2025, tell a much deeper story than the 27-19 final score alone. Seattle Seahawks defeated the Houston Texans by starting fast, controlling the ground game, and creating enough defensive pressure to protect an early advantage. Houston fought back after a scoreless first quarter, but its offense struggled to turn possession into points consistently.

The game also provides a useful example of how individual performances can shape an NFL result. C.J. Stroud threw for 229 yards, while Sam Darnold finished with 213 passing yards. However, neither quarterback produced an especially efficient passing performance. The biggest difference came in the supporting numbers. Jaxon Smith-Njigba delivered 123 receiving yards and a touchdown for Seattle, while Zach Charbonnet scored twice on the ground. Houston’s Dalton Schultz led all Texans receivers with 98 yards.

Seattle ultimately won 27-19, improving its record to 5-2 while Houston fell to 2-4. Looking beyond the scoreboard reveals how the Seahawks built their lead, why the Texans struggled to close the gap, and which players had the greatest statistical influence.

Texans vs Seahawks Match Player Stats at a Glance

The following table provides the most important player and team numbers from the game.

Category	Houston Texans	Seattle Seahawks
Final Score	19	27
Record After Game	2-4	5-2
Passing Leader	C.J. Stroud: 229 yards	Sam Darnold: 213 yards
Passing TDs	1	1
Passing INTs	1	1
Team Rushing	56 yards	118 yards
Rushing TDs	0	2
Leading Receiver	Dalton Schultz: 98 yards	Jaxon Smith-Njigba: 123 yards
Receiving TDs	1	1
Team Receptions	23	17
Team Passing Yards	229	213
Sacks	2	3
Interceptions	2	1
Tackles	72	65
Total TFL	8	10

One of the clearest statistical differences is rushing production. Houston generated only 56 rushing yards on 17 attempts, while Seattle produced 118 yards on 33 attempts. That 62-yard advantage helped Seattle control the game’s tempo and reduce the pressure on its passing attack.

How the Seahawks Built Their 27-19 Victory

Seattle’s victory was largely established during two quarters.

The Seahawks scored 14 points in the first quarter and another 13 in the third. Houston, meanwhile, did not score in the opening quarter and managed only six points in both the second and third quarters before adding seven in the fourth.

The scoring pattern was:

• First quarter: Seahawks 14, Texans 0
• Second quarter: Seahawks 0, Texans 6
• Third quarter: Seahawks 13, Texans 6
• Fourth quarter: Seahawks 0, Texans 7

That pattern matters because it shows Seattle was not simply better for four uninterrupted quarters. Houston had stretches where it competed effectively, particularly after halftime. The difference was that Seattle created a substantial advantage early enough to make Houston play catch-up.

A comeback against a team that had already scored 14 points in the first quarter required Houston to become more efficient offensively. Instead, the Texans continued to experience difficulties moving the ball consistently.

C.J. Stroud’s Passing Performance

C.J. Stroud completed 23 of 49 passes for 229 yards, with one touchdown and one interception.

His statistical line was:

• 23 completions
• 49 attempts
• 229 passing yards
• 4.7 yards per attempt
• 1 touchdown
• 1 interception
• 3 sacks for 31 yards
• 28.5 QBR
• 59.0 passer rating

The completion percentage was approximately 46.9 percent, which indicates how difficult it was for Houston to sustain its passing offense.

Stroud did have productive moments. The Texans moved the ball through Dalton Schultz and Jaylin Noel, and Houston eventually produced 229 passing yards. However, the high number of attempts relative to the yardage output shows that the offense was not generating enough efficiency through the air.

Forty-nine pass attempts is a significant workload. When a quarterback throws that many passes but averages only 4.7 yards per attempt, the offense needs other areas to compensate. Houston did not get that compensation from its rushing game.

Stroud’s Best Receiving Options

Dalton Schultz was the most productive Texans receiver.

He recorded:

• 9 receptions
• 98 yards
• 10.9 yards per reception
• 10 targets
• 22-yard long reception
• 0 receiving touchdowns

Schultz accounted for a major portion of Houston’s passing production. His nine receptions also made him one of the most reliable outlets for Stroud.

Jaylin Noel was another important contributor with four receptions for 77 yards. His 19.3-yard average was considerably higher than Schultz’s, showing that Houston had the ability to produce explosive plays even though the overall passing attack lacked consistency.

Nico Collins finished with four receptions for 27 yards on 10 targets. His 6.8-yard average per reception indicates that Houston was unable to consistently convert his opportunities into substantial yardage.

Woody Marks contributed three receptions for 20 yards and a touchdown.

Sam Darnold’s Passing Performance

Sam Darnold completed 17 of 31 passes for 213 yards, one touchdown and one interception.

His numbers included:

• 17 completions
• 31 attempts
• 213 passing yards
• 6.9 yards per attempt
• 1 touchdown
• 1 interception
• 2 sacks for 15 yards
• 44.8 QBR
• 73.7 passer rating

Darnold’s 6.9 yards per attempt was substantially better than Stroud’s 4.7. That difference is important because it shows Seattle generated more passing yardage per attempt despite throwing 18 fewer passes.

Darnold was not perfect. He threw an interception and lost a fumble, contributing to Seattle’s two lost fumbles. Still, the overall passing efficiency was stronger than Houston’s.

Seattle’s offense also benefited from the fact that Darnold did not have to carry the entire attack. The Seahawks rushed for 118 yards and scored two rushing touchdowns, giving the quarterback a more balanced offensive environment.

Jaxon Smith-Njigba Was Seattle’s Standout Receiver

Jaxon Smith-Njigba produced the most impressive receiving line of the game.

He finished with:

• 8 receptions
• 123 yards
• 15.4 yards per reception
• 1 touchdown
• 14 targets
• 26-yard long reception

His 123 yards represented more than half of Seattle’s total passing production.

Smith-Njigba also received 14 targets, showing how central he was to the Seahawks’ passing strategy. Unlike Houston’s passing attack, which spread production among several players without a single dominant high-yardage receiver, Seattle had a clear focal point.

His 15.4 yards per reception also demonstrates that his impact was not limited to short completions. Seattle was able to turn his opportunities into meaningful chunks of yardage.

From a matchup perspective, this was one of the game’s most important individual performances.

Seattle’s Rushing Advantage

The rushing statistics provide one of the clearest explanations for the final result.

Seattle ran the ball 33 times for 118 yards, averaging 3.6 yards per carry. Houston managed only 17 attempts for 56 yards at 3.3 yards per carry.

Seattle’s leading rushers were:

Kenneth Walker III

Kenneth Walker III carried the ball 17 times for 66 yards.

That gave him:

• 17 attempts
• 66 yards
• 3.9 yards per carry

Walker did not score a rushing touchdown, but his workload was important. His 17 carries represented more than half of Seattle’s team rushing attempts.

Zach Charbonnet

Zach Charbonnet provided the game’s biggest rushing scoring contribution.

He recorded:

• 12 carries
• 49 yards
• 4.1 yards per carry
• 2 touchdowns

Charbonnet’s two touchdowns were particularly important because Seattle’s offense converted its rushing opportunities into points.

His 49 yards were only 17 fewer than Walker’s despite receiving five fewer carries. His 4.1-yard average was also the better figure between the two primary Seattle backs.

Houston’s Rushing Attack

Houston’s ground game was far less productive.

C.J. Stroud had two carries for 25 yards, while Nick Chubb recorded five carries for 16 yards. Woody Marks carried 10 times for 15 yards.

Houston’s complete rushing output was:

• 17 attempts
• 56 yards
• 3.3 yards per attempt
• 0 touchdowns
• 15-yard longest run

The lack of rushing success placed greater responsibility on Stroud and the passing game. Houston ultimately attempted 49 passes, compared with only 17 rushing attempts.

That imbalance is one of the strongest statistical indicators of how the game developed.

Texans Receiving Numbers Tell an Interesting Story

Houston’s receiving group combined for 23 catches and 229 yards.

The leading performers were:

Player	Receptions	Yards	Average	TDs	Targets
Dalton Schultz	9	98	10.9	0	10
Jaylin Noel	4	77	19.3	0	7
Nico Collins	4	27	6.8	0	10
Woody Marks	3	20	6.7	1	5

Schultz was the possession leader, while Noel provided the bigger-play element.

The interesting point is that Houston actually had several players producing useful numbers. The problem was converting those individual contributions into sustained scoring drives.

The Texans finished with one passing touchdown and one receiving touchdown, but the offense still managed only 19 total points.

That distinction is important. Productive individual statistics do not always translate into efficient team offense.

Seattle’s Receiving Numbers

Seattle had 17 receptions for 213 yards.

The primary contributors were:

Player	Receptions	Yards	Average	TDs	Targets
Jaxon Smith-Njigba	8	123	15.4	1	14
Elijah Arroyo	4	42	10.5	0	5
Cooper Kupp	1	32	32.0	0	Not listed

Smith-Njigba was clearly the centerpiece.

Elijah Arroyo added four catches for 42 yards, while Cooper Kupp caught one pass for 32 yards. That lone reception was especially notable because it averaged 32 yards.

Seattle therefore generated 213 passing yards with considerably fewer receptions than Houston. Houston needed 23 catches to reach 229 yards, while Seattle reached 213 with 17 receptions.

That suggests a more explosive passing profile for Seattle.

The Unusual Cooper Kupp Passing Stat

One unusual entry in the supplied box-score data is Cooper Kupp’s passing line:

• 0 completions
• 1 attempt
• 0 passing yards
• 1 interception

This means Kupp was credited with a pass attempt that resulted in an interception. It is a notable detail when reviewing the complete player statistics because it contributes to Seattle’s overall turnover total and explains why the team’s passing statistics cannot be understood solely by looking at Darnold.

For readers analyzing quarterback numbers, this is an important distinction. Darnold’s interception and Kupp’s interception are separate events, even though Darnold was Seattle’s primary quarterback.

Defensive Performance: Houston Created Turnovers

Houston’s defense recorded two interceptions.

Derek Stingley Jr. had one interception and returned it 17 yards, while Calen Bullock also intercepted a pass and returned it 11 yards.

Houston’s defense finished with:

• 72 tackles
• 45 solo tackles
• 2 sacks
• 8 tackles for loss
• 5 passes defended
• 5 quarterback hits
• 1 defensive touchdown

The two interceptions were valuable because turnovers can quickly change field position and scoring opportunities.

Houston also recovered two fumbles, with Will Anderson Jr. and Azeez Al-Shaair each credited with a recovery. The Texans did not lose a fumble.

So, from a turnover standpoint, Houston’s defense had several positive moments.

The problem was that those defensive plays did not completely offset the offensive inefficiency.

Seattle’s Defense Applied More Pressure

Seattle’s defense finished with:

• 65 tackles
• 45 solo tackles
• 3 sacks
• 10 tackles for loss
• 12 passes defended
• 7 quarterback hits
• 0 defensive touchdowns

The Seahawks recorded more sacks, tackles for loss, passes defended and quarterback hits than Houston.

That pressure profile is particularly relevant when examining Stroud’s passing numbers. He was sacked three times for a loss of 31 yards and finished with a 28.5 QBR.

Seattle did not need to completely shut down Houston’s passing attack. Instead, the defense created enough disruption to prevent the Texans from consistently turning drives into points.

The 12 passes defended also indicate that Seattle’s secondary was active against Houston’s passing game.

Turnovers and Hidden Yardage

Turnovers are often one of the first statistics people look at after an NFL game, but the details matter.

Houston recorded two interceptions and recovered two fumbles. Seattle recorded one interception and lost two fumbles.

Seattle therefore had more turnover problems than Houston, yet still won the game by eight points.

That is significant.

It shows the Seahawks’ advantage came from other areas, particularly:

• Rushing production
• Early scoring
• Passing efficiency
• Defensive pressure
• Red-zone scoring through the running game

A team can survive a negative turnover margin when it creates advantages elsewhere. Seattle’s ability to produce 118 rushing yards compared with Houston’s 56 was one of those advantages.

Special Teams Contributions

Special teams also played a meaningful role.

Houston’s Ka’imi Fairbairn converted both of his field-goal attempts, including a long of 46 yards. He also made his only extra-point attempt for seven total points.

Seattle’s Jason Myers made two of three field-goal attempts, with a long of 47 yards. He converted all three extra points and finished with nine points.

Seattle’s return game also produced useful field position.

George Holani returned three kickoffs for 88 yards, averaging 29.3 yards per return, with a long of 34 yards. Dareke Young added one return for 28 yards.

Houston’s Tremon Smith had six kickoff returns for 154 yards, averaging 25.7 yards per return, with a 33-yard long.

On punt returns, Tory Horton led Seattle with five returns for 67 yards, an average of 13.4 yards per return. Braxton Berrios returned three punts for Houston for 25 yards.

These numbers demonstrate that the game was not decided exclusively by offensive stars.

Punting Comparison

The punting numbers were also notable.

Houston’s Tommy Townsend punted seven times for 344 yards, averaging 49.1 yards per punt. His longest punt was 57 yards.

Seattle’s Michael Dickson punted four times for 205 yards, averaging 51.3 yards, with a long of 58 yards.

The difference in average punt distance was relatively small, but the number of punts tells another story. Houston punted seven times compared with Seattle’s four.

That is another indication that Houston struggled to sustain drives.

Texans vs Seahawks Match Player Stats: What They Reveal

The most useful way to interpret the texans vs seahawks match player stats is to move beyond individual totals and identify the relationships between them.

Seattle Won the Efficiency Battle

Darnold attempted 31 passes and gained 213 yards.

Stroud attempted 49 and gained 229.

That means Seattle generated almost as many passing yards with significantly fewer attempts.

The difference becomes even clearer when combined with rushing production.

Seattle gained 118 yards on the ground, while Houston gained only 56.

Seattle therefore had a more balanced offensive profile.

Houston Had More Passing Volume

Stroud’s 49 attempts were 18 more than Darnold’s.

More passing attempts are not automatically a negative. In fact, a team trailing early often has to throw more. But Houston’s 4.7 yards per attempt meant those attempts did not consistently produce enough yardage.

The Seahawks’ defense deserves credit for limiting explosive passing efficiency.

Seattle’s Running Backs Delivered the Touchdowns

Charbonnet scored twice on 12 carries.

Houston’s primary running backs did not score a rushing touchdown.

That difference directly influenced the scoreboard.

Smith-Njigba Was the Most Productive Receiver

With 123 yards and a touchdown, Smith-Njigba was the game’s most productive pass catcher.

His performance gave Seattle a reliable high-volume target and an explosive element in the passing attack.

Why Houston Lost Despite Defensive Takeaways

At first glance, Houston’s defensive statistics might suggest that the Texans had enough big plays to win.

They intercepted Seattle twice and recovered two fumbles without losing one themselves.

Yet Houston still lost.

The reason is that turnovers were not enough to overcome the offensive gap.

Houston’s offense produced:

• 229 passing yards
• 56 rushing yards
• 19 total points

Seattle produced:

• 213 passing yards
• 118 rushing yards
• 27 points

Seattle therefore gained 331 combined passing and rushing yards from the supplied team totals, compared with 285 for Houston.

The 46-yard difference is not enormous, but the distribution matters. Seattle was far more successful running the ball and converting rushing opportunities into touchdowns.

A Closer Look at the Game’s Momentum

The first quarter shaped the entire contest.

Seattle scored 14 points while Houston failed to score.

That gave the Seahawks an immediate two-score advantage.

Houston then responded with six points in the second quarter, but Seattle did not allow the Texans to erase the deficit.

The third quarter was particularly important. Seattle scored another 13 points while Houston added six.

By the end of the third quarter, Seattle had built a 27-12 advantage based on the quarter-by-quarter scoring data.

Houston scored seven points in the fourth quarter, but Seattle did not score in the final period. Even so, the Seahawks’ earlier production was enough to secure the 27-19 victory.

This is a useful example of why game flow matters when interpreting player statistics. A player may accumulate strong numbers late because his team is chasing the score, but those statistics do not necessarily mean the team controlled the game.

The Most Important Individual Performers

Several players stand out when the complete numbers are considered.

Jaxon Smith-Njigba

His 8 catches, 123 yards and touchdown made him Seattle’s leading offensive weapon.

Zach Charbonnet

His 12 carries for 49 yards and two touchdowns gave Seattle crucial scoring production.

Kenneth Walker III

Walker carried 17 times for 66 yards and helped maintain Seattle’s rushing workload.

Sam Darnold

Darnold passed for 213 yards and one touchdown while averaging 6.9 yards per attempt.

Dalton Schultz

Schultz was Houston’s leading receiver with nine catches for 98 yards.

Jaylin Noel

Noel averaged 19.3 yards per reception and finished with 77 yards on four catches.

Derek Stingley Jr. and Calen Bullock

Both Texans defenders recorded interceptions, creating important defensive plays.

Seattle’s Front Seven

The Seahawks recorded three sacks, 10 tackles for loss and seven quarterback hits, helping disrupt Houston’s offense.

What the Numbers Mean for Future Analysis

A single game should not be used to define a player’s entire season. That is particularly important with quarterback statistics.

For example, Stroud’s 229 passing yards and 59.0 rating describe what happened in this specific matchup. They do not independently establish his overall ability or season-long performance.

The same applies to Darnold.

Instead, this game should be viewed as one data point that helps explain how these particular offenses and defenses matched up on October 20, 2025.

For analysts, the most useful approach is to combine:

1. Passing efficiency
2. Rushing efficiency
3. Turnover production
4. Pressure statistics
5. Receiving efficiency
6. Scoring distribution
7. Game situation

That creates a much more complete picture than looking only at passing yards or the final score.

Key Statistical Takeaways

The most important numbers from the matchup can be summarized simply.

• Seattle won 27-19.
• The Seahawks improved to 5-2.
• Houston fell to 2-4.
• Seattle scored 14 points in the first quarter.
• Seattle rushed for 118 yards.
• Houston rushed for only 56 yards.
• Jaxon Smith-Njigba recorded 123 receiving yards and a touchdown.
• Zach Charbonnet scored two rushing touchdowns.
• C.J. Stroud threw for 229 yards with one touchdown and one interception.
• Sam Darnold threw for 213 yards with one touchdown and one interception.
• Dalton Schultz caught nine passes for 98 yards.
• Houston recorded two interceptions.
• Seattle recorded one interception.
• Seattle had three sacks.
• Houston had two sacks.
• Seattle recorded 10 tackles for loss.
• Houston recorded eight tackles for loss.
• Jason Myers scored nine points for Seattle.
• Ka’imi Fairbairn scored seven points for Houston.

Texans vs Seahawks Match Player Stats: Frequently Asked Questions

Who won the Texans vs Seahawks game on October 20, 2025?

The Seattle Seahawks defeated the Houston Texans 27-19 on October 20, 2025.

Who was Seattle’s leading receiver?

Jaxon Smith-Njigba led Seattle with eight receptions for 123 yards and one touchdown.

Who led the Texans in receiving?

Dalton Schultz led Houston with nine receptions for 98 yards on 10 targets.

How many rushing yards did the Seahawks have?

Seattle recorded 118 rushing yards on 33 attempts, averaging 3.6 yards per carry.

How many passing yards did C.J. Stroud have?

C.J. Stroud completed 23 of 49 passes for 229 yards, one touchdown and one interception.

Which player scored two rushing touchdowns for Seattle?

Zach Charbonnet scored both of Seattle’s rushing touchdowns, finishing with 12 carries for 49 yards.

Conclusion

The texans vs seahawks match player stats show that Seattle’s 27-19 victory was built on balance rather than one overwhelming statistical category.

The Seahawks passed for 213 yards and rushed for another 118, giving the offense a productive combination of passing and ground production. Sam Darnold delivered 213 passing yards, while Jaxon Smith-Njigba emerged as the leading receiver with 123 yards and a touchdown. Zach Charbonnet added two rushing touchdowns, and Kenneth Walker III supplied 66 rushing yards on 17 attempts.

Houston had several strong individual performances. C.J. Stroud threw for 229 yards, Dalton Schultz caught nine passes for 98 yards, and Jaylin Noel produced 77 yards at an impressive 19.3 yards per reception. Defensively, Derek Stingley Jr. and Calen Bullock each recorded an interception.

However, the Texans struggled to run the football and produced only 56 rushing yards. Their 49 pass attempts also resulted in just 229 passing yards. Seattle’s defense generated three sacks, seven quarterback hits and 10 tackles for loss, adding pressure at important moments.

The quarter-by-quarter scoring ultimately explains the result. Seattle established a 14-0 lead in the opening period and added 13 more points in the third quarter. Houston continued to compete and scored seven points in the fourth, but the early deficit proved too large to overcome.