Golden State Warriors vs LA Clippers Match Player Stats
The golden state warriors vs la clippers match player stats from the April 16, 2026 NBA Play-In game tell a much more detailed story than the final 126-121 score alone. Golden State defeated Los Angeles at Intuit Dome in Inglewood, California, overcoming a slow start and turning the game around with an outstanding fourth-quarter offensive performance. Stephen Curry led the Warriors with 35 points, while Gui Santos and Kristaps Porzingis each added 20 points.
For the Clippers, Jordan Miller produced 23 points and 9 rebounds from the bench, while Kawhi Leonard and Darius Garland each scored 21 points. Brook Lopez also made a strong contribution with 17 points, 5 rebounds, 2 steals, and 1 block.
The five-point margin does not fully explain how the game developed. Los Angeles controlled the opening quarter 31-22 and maintained a nine-point advantage after two quarters. Golden State then changed the rhythm of the contest, scoring 30 points in the third quarter before exploding for 43 points in the fourth.
That fourth-quarter turnaround became the defining feature of the matchup.
Golden State Warriors vs LA Clippers Match Player Stats: Game Overview
The Warriors entered the game with a 37-45 record and were coming off a three-game losing streak. The Clippers entered at 42-40 after winning their previous game. On paper, Los Angeles had the stronger regular-season record and home-court advantage.
The game, however, was decided by execution rather than standings.
Match Details
| Category | Details |
| Game | Golden State Warriors vs. LA Clippers |
| Date | April 16, 2026 |
| Competition | NBA Play-In, West, 9th Place vs. 10th Place |
| Final Score | Warriors 126, Clippers 121 |
| Location | Intuit Dome, Inglewood, California |
| Attendance | 17,927 |
| Tip-off | 7:00 AM |
| Where to Watch | Prime Video |
| Officials | James Williams, Sean Corbin, Karl Lane, Ben Taylor |
| Matchup Result | Warriors won 1-0 |
The Warriors’ victory gave them a 1-0 advantage in the matchup represented by the supplied game data.
One important point for readers studying the box score is that a five-point result can hide significant swings in momentum. This game is a good example. The Clippers scored 31 points in the first quarter, but Golden State eventually found enough offensive efficiency to finish with 126 points.
How the Game Unfolded
The scoring pattern provides one of the clearest ways to understand the contest.
First Quarter: Clippers Establish Control
Los Angeles opened the game strongly, scoring 31 points compared with Golden State’s 22.
The Clippers’ early advantage was important because it forced Golden State to play from behind. With players such as Kawhi Leonard, Darius Garland, Brook Lopez, and Derrick Jones Jr. contributing, Los Angeles was able to establish offensive pressure early.
Golden State did not panic, but the eight-point first-quarter deficit showed that the Warriors would need to improve their shot-making and ball movement.
Second Quarter: Los Angeles Maintains Its Lead
The Clippers added another 30 points in the second quarter, while Golden State scored 31.
That meant the Warriors slightly reduced the deficit, but Los Angeles still held a strong position at halftime.
The first-half scoring was:
- Warriors: 22 points in the first quarter
- Clippers: 31 points in the first quarter
- Warriors: 31 points in the second quarter
- Clippers: 30 points in the second quarter
At halftime, the Clippers had scored 61 points and the Warriors had scored 53.
This is where the eventual comeback becomes particularly interesting. Golden State did not need to completely change its offensive approach. Instead, the team became significantly more productive as the game progressed.
Third Quarter: Warriors Start Closing the Gap
Golden State scored 30 points in the third quarter, while Los Angeles scored 28.
The difference was only two points, but it moved the game closer to an even contest.
The Warriors were still behind entering the final quarter, yet the offensive trend had changed. Their scoring had improved from 22 points in the opening period to 31 and then 30.
That progression set up a dramatic fourth quarter.
Fourth Quarter: Golden State Takes Over
The biggest statistical difference came in the final period.
Golden State scored 43 points in the fourth quarter.
Los Angeles scored 32.
That gave the Warriors an 11-point advantage in the final quarter, which was enough to overcome the earlier deficit and finish with a 126-121 victory.
The quarter-by-quarter numbers were:
| Quarter | Warriors | Clippers |
| 1st | 22 | 31 |
| 2nd | 31 | 30 |
| 3rd | 30 | 28 |
| 4th | 43 | 32 |
| Total | 126 | 121 |
The fourth-quarter scoring difference is arguably the single most important team statistic from this game.
Stephen Curry Leads Golden State
Stephen Curry was the Warriors’ leading scorer with 35 points.
His scoring output was a major reason Golden State was able to reach 126 points despite trailing for much of the contest.
Curry’s 35 points represented the highest individual scoring total recorded in the supplied box score. His production also separated him from the rest of Golden State’s scoring group.
The Warriors received 20 points each from Gui Santos and Kristaps Porzingis, giving the team three major scoring contributors.
That balance matters.
When a team receives 35 points from its leading scorer and another 40 combined points from two additional players, opposing defenses have fewer opportunities to concentrate entirely on one offensive threat.
Gui Santos Provides 20 Points
Gui Santos finished with 20 points, matching Kristaps Porzingis for second on the Warriors.
His scoring contribution was particularly valuable because Golden State needed production beyond Curry.
A common challenge for teams in high-pressure games is becoming too dependent on one primary scorer. The Warriors avoided that problem to an important degree.
Santos’ 20 points meant the Clippers had to account for another productive offensive player.
Kristaps Porzingis Adds 20 Points
Kristaps Porzingis also finished with 20 points.
His scoring output matched Santos and gave Golden State another reliable source of offense alongside Curry.
The combination of Curry’s 35 points, Santos’ 20 points, and Porzingis’ 20 points accounted for 75 of Golden State’s 126 points.
That means those three players produced a large majority of the Warriors’ total scoring.
For a team trying to recover from a double-digit fourth-quarter deficit, that kind of scoring concentration can be extremely important.
Draymond Green’s All-Around Contribution
Draymond Green scored only 7 points, but looking only at his scoring total would miss the broader value of his performance.
Green recorded:
- 7 points
- 6 rebounds
- 9 assists
His nine assists were especially notable.
A player does not need to be among the team’s leading scorers to have a major influence on offensive performance. Green’s passing helped create opportunities for other players, including Curry and the Warriors’ secondary scorers.
His stat line is a good reminder that traditional points-per-game comparisons are not always enough when evaluating an individual performance.
Brandin Podziemski Contributes Across the Box Score
Brandin Podziemski finished with:
- 17 points
- 7 rebounds
- 2 assists
His 17 points placed him behind Curry, Santos, and Porzingis among the listed Golden State contributors.
The seven rebounds also added value, particularly in a game where both teams finished with 36 total rebounds.
Podziemski’s combination of scoring and rebounding helped Golden State maintain production beyond its biggest stars.
Golden State’s Bench Production
The Warriors also received useful scoring from their reserves.
Al Horford scored 14 points, while De’Anthony Melton scored 7 points and Gary Payton II added 6 points.
The supplied data lists the Warriors’ bench as:
- Al Horford
- Omer Yurtseven
- Gary Payton II
- De’Anthony Melton
- Charles Bassey
- Seth Curry
- Pat Spencer
- Will Richard
One data field refers to a “John?” bench leader but marks it as not applicable. That entry should not be treated as a confirmed player statistic.
The more reliable figures supplied for the bench are Horford’s 14 points, Melton’s 7 points, and Payton II’s 6 points.
Jordan Miller Leads the Clippers
Jordan Miller was the Clippers’ leading scorer with 23 points.
He also recorded 9 rebounds, making his performance one of the most complete individual stat lines on the Los Angeles roster.
Miller’s production was particularly significant because it came from the bench.
Bench scoring can become decisive when starters are heavily defended or when a team needs a scoring boost during difficult stretches. Miller provided that offensive support for Los Angeles.
His 23 points were also higher than the scoring totals of both Kawhi Leonard and Darius Garland.
Kawhi Leonard Scores 21 Points
Kawhi Leonard finished with 21 points.
That placed him second among the Clippers’ starters in the supplied scoring figures, tied with Darius Garland.
Leonard remains one of the most recognizable names in the matchup, but the box score shows that Los Angeles needed contributions from several players rather than relying exclusively on one star.
His 21 points were important, but the Warriors ultimately generated enough offensive production to overcome the Clippers’ balanced scoring.
Darius Garland Adds 21 Points
Darius Garland also scored 21 points.
His scoring output matched Leonard and gave the Clippers another significant offensive contributor.
Garland’s presence was particularly useful because the Clippers were able to generate production from both their perimeter players and frontcourt options.
The challenge for Los Angeles was not simply finding scoring. The bigger issue was maintaining that production when Golden State increased its offensive output dramatically in the fourth quarter.
Brook Lopez Delivers a Strong Interior Performance
Brook Lopez scored 17 points and added:
- 5 rebounds
- 1 assist
- 2 steals
- 1 block
The defensive numbers are particularly interesting.
Lopez contributed both steals and a block, showing activity beyond his scoring role.
His 17 points also made him one of the Clippers’ most productive starters.
However, Los Angeles needed even more defensive resistance in the fourth quarter as Golden State scored 43 points.
Kris Dunn’s Playmaking Stands Out
Kris Dunn scored only 7 points, but his 10 assists were one of the most noteworthy numbers in the entire Clippers box score.
He also recorded:
- 3 rebounds
- 3 steals
Dunn’s performance illustrates why a box score should be evaluated beyond scoring.
Ten assists indicate that he played a major role in creating scoring opportunities for teammates. His three steals also show defensive activity.
Although his seven points were modest, his overall statistical contribution was significant.
Derrick Jones Jr. Impacts the Defensive End
Derrick Jones Jr. finished with:
- 13 points
- 2 rebounds
- 1 assist
- 3 steals
- 1 block
His three steals and one block demonstrate strong defensive involvement.
Jones Jr. also contributed double-digit scoring, which gave Los Angeles another useful offensive piece.
The combination of 13 points, three steals, and a block represents a well-rounded performance even though it did not lead the team in scoring.
Clippers Bench Production
The Clippers’ bench included:
- John Collins
- Jordan Miller
- Bennedict Mathurin
- Kobe Sanders
- Nicolas Batum
- Isaiah Jackson
- Bogdan Bogdanovic
- Cam Christie
Jordan Miller led the reserve group with 23 points and 9 rebounds.
John Collins added 11 points and 9 rebounds.
Bennedict Mathurin scored 5 points, while Kobe Sanders scored 3 points.
The Clippers therefore received meaningful production from their bench, particularly through Miller and Collins.
Team Shooting Comparison
One of the most revealing areas of the box score is shooting efficiency.
Golden State finished with:
- 47-of-83 field goals
- 19-of-41 three-pointers
- 13-of-21 free throws
- 57% field-goal shooting
- 46% three-point shooting
- 62% free-throw shooting
Los Angeles finished with:
- 45-of-86 field goals
- 14-of-35 three-pointers
- 17-of-17 free throws
- 52% field-goal shooting
- 40% three-point shooting
- 100% free-throw shooting
The contrast is important.
The Clippers were perfect from the free-throw line, going 17-for-17. Golden State, however, generated significantly better three-point efficiency.
The Warriors made 19 of 41 three-point attempts, compared with 14 of 35 for Los Angeles.
That difference in perimeter shooting efficiency helped explain how Golden State could score 126 points.
Three-Point Shooting Was a Major Difference
Golden State’s 19 made three-pointers were five more than Los Angeles’ 14.
The Warriors also shot 46% from three-point range, while the Clippers shot 40%.
In a game decided by only five points, that difference is meaningful.
The Warriors did not simply attempt more three-pointers. They converted them at a higher rate.
This combination of volume and efficiency can create rapid scoring swings, especially during a comeback.
The 43-point fourth quarter is consistent with a team finding greater offensive rhythm late in the game.
Free Throws Tell a Different Story
The Clippers were perfect from the free-throw line.
Los Angeles made all 17 of its free-throw attempts.
Golden State made 13 of 21.
That means the Clippers actually had a clear advantage at the free-throw line in terms of conversion.
However, the Warriors made up for that difference through field-goal and three-point efficiency.
This is an important lesson when reading basketball statistics: one area of superiority does not automatically determine the final result.
Rebounding Was Even
Both teams finished with 36 rebounds.
Golden State recorded:
- 10 offensive rebounds
- 26 defensive rebounds
Los Angeles recorded:
- 9 offensive rebounds
- 27 defensive rebounds
The overall rebounding battle was therefore extremely close.
Golden State had a one-rebound advantage on the offensive glass, while Los Angeles had a one-rebound advantage defensively.
This suggests that rebounding was not the primary reason one team won.
Assists Show Another Close Battle
The Warriors finished with 29 assists.
The Clippers recorded 30 assists.
Los Angeles therefore had a one-assist advantage.
This is another example of why the final result cannot be explained simply by saying the winning team dominated every statistical category.
The Clippers actually recorded more assists and shot 100% from the free-throw line.
Golden State’s advantage came from other areas, especially overall scoring efficiency and three-point production.
Turnovers Favored the Clippers
Golden State committed 20 turnovers, while Los Angeles committed 17.
That gave the Clippers a three-turnover advantage.
The Warriors also recorded 12 steals compared with 15 for Los Angeles.
From a ball-security perspective, Los Angeles had the better numbers.
Yet Golden State still won.
This is one of the most useful insights from the game. A team can lose the turnover battle and still win when it creates enough offensive efficiency elsewhere.
Defensive Activity From Both Teams
Both teams recorded 3 blocks.
The Clippers had 15 steals compared with 12 for Golden State.
Los Angeles therefore showed slightly greater defensive activity according to these traditional defensive statistics.
However, defensive statistics such as steals and blocks should not be treated as a complete measurement of defensive quality.
The fourth-quarter score provides an important counterpoint. Golden State scored 43 points during the period when the game was decided.
Warriors Team Performance in Context
The Warriors’ complete team numbers were:
| Statistic | Warriors |
| Field Goals | 47-83 |
| Three-Pointers | 19-41 |
| Free Throws | 13-21 |
| Rebounds | 36 |
| Assists | 29 |
| Turnovers | 20 |
| Steals | 12 |
| Blocks | 3 |
| Offensive Rebounds | 10 |
| Defensive Rebounds | 26 |
| Fouls | 19 |
| Field-Goal Percentage | 57% |
| Three-Point Percentage | 46% |
| Free-Throw Percentage | 62% |
The 57% field-goal percentage stands out immediately.
Golden State also converted 46% of its three-point attempts.
Those numbers help explain the Warriors’ 126-point total despite their 20 turnovers.
Clippers Team Performance in Context
Los Angeles finished with:
| Statistic | Clippers |
| Field Goals | 45-86 |
| Three-Pointers | 14-35 |
| Free Throws | 17-17 |
| Rebounds | 36 |
| Assists | 30 |
| Turnovers | 17 |
| Steals | 15 |
| Blocks | 3 |
| Offensive Rebounds | 9 |
| Defensive Rebounds | 27 |
| Fouls | 23 |
| Field-Goal Percentage | 52% |
| Three-Point Percentage | 40% |
| Free-Throw Percentage | 100% |
Los Angeles produced a strong overall shooting performance, but Golden State was more efficient from the field.
The five-point final margin demonstrates how closely matched many aspects of the game were.
Golden State Warriors vs LA Clippers Match Player Stats: Most Important Performances
When the individual numbers are placed together, several performances stand out.
Warriors
Stephen Curry: 35 points
Gui Santos: 20 points
Kristaps Porzingis: 20 points
Brandin Podziemski: 17 points, 7 rebounds, 2 assists
Al Horford: 14 points
Draymond Green: 7 points, 6 rebounds, 9 assists
De’Anthony Melton: 7 points
Gary Payton II: 6 points
Clippers
Jordan Miller: 23 points, 9 rebounds
Kawhi Leonard: 21 points
Darius Garland: 21 points
Brook Lopez: 17 points, 5 rebounds, 1 assist, 2 steals, 1 block
Derrick Jones Jr.: 13 points, 2 rebounds, 1 assist, 3 steals, 1 block
John Collins: 11 points, 9 rebounds
Kris Dunn: 7 points, 3 rebounds, 10 assists, 3 steals
Bennedict Mathurin: 5 points
Kobe Sanders: 3 points
What Actually Decided the Game?
The simplest explanation is Golden State’s fourth-quarter offense.
The Warriors scored 43 points in the final period.
But the deeper explanation involves several connected factors.
First, Golden State shot 57% from the field compared with 52% for Los Angeles.
Second, the Warriors made 19 three-pointers, five more than the Clippers.
Third, Curry provided 35 points, while Santos and Porzingis each supplied 20.
Fourth, Green contributed nine assists, helping the offense create opportunities beyond individual scoring.
The Clippers had advantages in turnovers, assists, steals, and free-throw accuracy. Those advantages were not enough to overcome Golden State’s scoring efficiency.
Why the Final Score Is More Informative Than the Records
The Warriors entered with a 37-45 record.
The Clippers entered with a 42-40 record.
Los Angeles also had a 23-18 home record, while Golden State was 15-26 on the road.
Those figures made the Clippers look stronger before tip-off.
But a single Play-In game is not decided by regular-season records.
The matchup showed how quickly a game can move away from pregame expectations.
Golden State’s road record and three-game losing streak did not prevent the team from winning at Intuit Dome.
Likewise, the Clippers’ stronger overall record and home record did not guarantee victory.
Understanding the Western Conference Context
The supplied Pacific Division standings before or around this matchup were:
| Team | Record | Winning Percentage |
| LA Lakers | 53-29 | .646 |
| Phoenix Suns | 45-37 | .549 |
| LA Clippers | 42-40 | .512 |
| Golden State Warriors | 37-45 | .451 |
| Sacramento Kings | 22-60 | .268 |
The standings provide useful context for understanding why this Play-In matchup carried importance.
The Clippers had finished above Golden State in the standings, but the Play-In format created a separate high-pressure opportunity.
The Warriors took advantage of it.
The Biggest Statistical Takeaways
Several conclusions can be drawn directly from the supplied box score.
1. Golden State Won the Scoring Efficiency Battle
The Warriors shot 57% from the field.
The Clippers shot 52%.
A five-percentage-point difference is meaningful when both teams take a similar number of shots.
2. The Warriors Had a Major Three-Point Advantage
Golden State made 19 three-pointers.
Los Angeles made 14.
That five-made-three difference provided a major scoring advantage.
3. Stephen Curry Was the Leading Individual Scorer
Curry’s 35 points were the highest individual total in the game.
4. The Clippers Had Excellent Free-Throw Shooting
Los Angeles went 17-for-17 from the free-throw line.
That was a perfect 100% conversion rate.
5. Kris Dunn Was a Major Playmaker
Dunn recorded 10 assists, the highest assist total listed for either team.
6. Jordan Miller Was a Major Bench Contributor
Miller scored 23 points and grabbed 9 rebounds.
His performance was one of the strongest individual showings for Los Angeles.
7. The Fourth Quarter Changed Everything
Golden State outscored Los Angeles 43-32 in the final period.
That 11-point difference was larger than the final five-point margin.
A Closer Look at the Warriors’ Comeback
The Warriors’ scoring progression deserves special attention.
They began with only 22 points in the opening quarter.
Then they scored 31 in the second, 30 in the third, and 43 in the fourth.
That means Golden State scored:
- 22 points in the first quarter
- 31 points in the second
- 30 points in the third
- 43 points in the fourth
The final two quarters produced 73 points.
This suggests a substantial improvement in offensive output as the game moved toward its conclusion.
It also explains why a team that trailed early was able to finish with 126 points.
What the Player Stats Reveal About Team Basketball
The most valuable lesson from these statistics is that individual scoring is only one part of the story.
Curry led the Warriors with 35 points, but Green’s nine assists helped facilitate the offense.
Podziemski combined 17 points with seven rebounds.
Porzingis and Santos each scored 20.
On the Clippers’ side, Miller combined 23 points with nine rebounds, while Dunn recorded 10 assists and three steals.
This is why serious box-score analysis should look at multiple categories rather than simply identifying the highest scorer.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who scored the most points in the Warriors vs Clippers game?
Stephen Curry was the game’s leading scorer with 35 points for Golden State.
What was the final score between the Warriors and Clippers?
The Golden State Warriors defeated the LA Clippers 126-121.
Who led the Clippers in scoring?
Jordan Miller led the Clippers with 23 points. Kawhi Leonard and Darius Garland each scored 21 points.
How many three-pointers did the Warriors make?
Golden State made 19 of 41 three-point attempts, shooting 46% from beyond the arc.
Who had the most assists in the game?
Kris Dunn recorded 10 assists for the Clippers. Draymond Green led Golden State with 9 assists.
Which team shot better from the field?
Golden State shot 57% from the field, compared with 52% for the Clippers.
Conclusion
The golden state warriors vs la clippers match player stats provide a detailed picture of a game that changed dramatically after halftime. Los Angeles started stronger and held the lead through the first half, but Golden State steadily improved its offensive output before producing a decisive 43-point fourth quarter.
Stephen Curry’s 35 points were the headline individual performance, while Gui Santos and Kristaps Porzingis each contributed 20 points. Draymond Green’s nine assists and Brandin Podziemski’s 17 points and seven rebounds added important all-around production.
For Los Angeles, Jordan Miller’s 23 points and nine rebounds stood out, while Kawhi Leonard and Darius Garland each scored 21. Kris Dunn’s 10 assists and three steals also made his performance statistically significant.
The team numbers show an especially interesting contrast. The Clippers had more assists, more steals, fewer turnovers, and perfect free-throw shooting. Golden State, however, shot more efficiently from the field and from three-point range. The Warriors’ 19 made three-pointers and 57% overall field-goal shooting helped compensate for their 20 turnovers.
Ultimately, the decisive statistic was the fourth quarter. Golden State scored 43 points against 32 from Los Angeles, transforming a game that had been controlled by the Clippers early into a 126-121 Warriors victory.
For anyone analyzing this matchup, the box score demonstrates why player statistics should be viewed collectively. Points, assists, rebounds, shooting efficiency, turnovers, and quarter-by-quarter scoring all contribute to the full story. The final result was not simply about one superstar performance. It was the product of Golden State finding its offensive rhythm at the most important stage of the game.
