Knicks vs Boston Celtics Match Player Stats

Knicks vs boston celtics match player stats from Game 4 of the 2025 Eastern Conference Semifinals tell the story of a dramatic 121-113 New York Knicks victory over the Boston Celtics. Jalen Brunson delivered 39 points and 12 assists, while Jayson Tatum produced a remarkable 42-point performance for Boston. Despite Tatum’s huge scoring night, New York controlled the second half, won the rebounding battle, created more points in the paint, and took a 3-1 series lead.

The game was played at Madison Square Garden, where 19,812 fans watched the Knicks overcome a double-digit deficit and turn the matchup around after halftime. Boston led 39-28 after the first quarter and carried a 62-51 advantage into halftime. New York then exploded for 37 points in the third quarter and added 33 more in the fourth.

That second-half turnaround is the key to understanding the player statistics.

A simple look at the scoring leaders might suggest that Tatum was the game’s best individual scorer and Brunson was close behind. That is true, but it does not fully explain why the Knicks won. The deeper numbers show that New York received a more balanced contribution across scoring, rebounding, playmaking, defense, and second-chance opportunities.

Knicks vs Boston Celtics Match Player Stats

Here is the main player-by-player statistical picture from Game 4.

Player	MIN	PTS	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	TO	STL	BLK	+/-
Jalen Brunson	40	39	14-25	4-8	7-9	5	12	1	0	0	+12
Karl-Anthony Towns	36	23	11-15	0-3	1-1	11	1	4	0	1	-1
Mikal Bridges	44	23	11-21	1-6	0-0	7	3	3	4	1	+14
OG Anunoby	40	20	8-14	4-8	0-0	3	2	0	0	0	+4
Josh Hart	30	6	2-7	1-3	1-2	9	5	3	1	0	+8
Precious Achiuwa	25	4	2-2	0-0	0-0	8	2	1	0	0	+6
Miles McBride	20	6	2-4	2-3	0-0	0	0	0	0	0	+3
Cameron Payne	4	0	0-3	0-3	0-0	0	0	0	0	0	-2
Jayson Tatum	40	42	16-28	7-16	3-3	8	4	4	4	2	-9
Derrick White	44	23	6-12	6-11	5-7	3	2	2	0	0	-10
Jaylen Brown	33	20	7-16	2-8	4-6	7	2	4	0	0	-1
Al Horford	38	5	1-2	1-2	2-2	5	4	0	2	0	-8
Jrue Holiday	34	4	2-5	0-2	0-0	4	3	0	0	0	-12
Kristaps Porzingis	24	7	2-6	0-2	3-6	4	0	1	1	0	+0

The statistics immediately highlight one of the game’s biggest contrasts.

Boston had the highest individual scorer in Tatum, but New York had more players contributing at an efficient level. Brunson, Towns, Bridges, and Anunoby combined for 105 points. That group accounted for most of the Knicks’ offensive production and gave New York several ways to attack Boston’s defense.

Boston’s primary scoring group was also productive. Tatum scored 42, White added 23, and Brown scored 20. The problem for Boston was not a complete lack of offensive production. It was what happened around those scoring performances.

Jalen Brunson’s 39 Points and 12 Assists

Jalen Brunson was the central figure in New York’s comeback.

He finished with 39 points, 12 assists, five rebounds, and only one turnover in 40 minutes. He shot 14-of-25 from the field, 4-of-8 from three-point range, and 7-of-9 from the free-throw line.

The 12 assists are particularly important.

A 39-point game can sometimes come from a player dominating the ball without creating enough opportunities for teammates. Brunson’s performance was different. He was both the primary scorer and the primary creator.

His assist-to-turnover profile was also excellent. Brunson produced 12 assists against just one turnover. That gave New York a reliable offensive organizer during a game in which Boston’s defense was forcing difficult possessions early.

His third quarter was especially important.

New York entered halftime down 11 points. Brunson then helped drive the Knicks’ 37-point third quarter. The team’s offensive rhythm changed rapidly, and Boston could not maintain the same level of control it had established during the opening half.

The value of Brunson’s performance therefore goes beyond his 39 points.

He helped New York score efficiently, created opportunities for teammates, limited wasted possessions, and maintained pressure against a Boston defense that had controlled much of the first half.

Jayson Tatum’s 42-Point Performance

Jayson Tatum produced the game’s highest scoring total with 42 points.

His shooting line was impressive:

• 16-of-28 from the field
• 7-of-16 from three
• 3-of-3 from the free-throw line
• 8 rebounds
• 4 assists
• 4 steals
• 2 blocks
• 4 turnovers
• 40 minutes

Tatum’s seven three-pointers were particularly significant because Boston relied heavily on perimeter scoring throughout the matchup.

He was efficient from both inside and outside, and his 42 points represented an enormous portion of Boston’s offensive output.

However, the final plus-minus of -9 illustrates an important lesson about individual scoring statistics. A player can have an outstanding offensive night while his team still loses the overall possession battle and game flow.

Tatum’s statistics should not be viewed as evidence that he played poorly. They show almost the opposite. Boston received an elite scoring performance from its leading star.

The larger issue was that New York’s second-half team performance outweighed Boston’s individual scoring advantage.

Tatum’s night also became more significant because he left the court late in the game after suffering a serious right leg injury. That moment changed the context of the closing minutes and became one of the defining events of the series.

Karl-Anthony Towns Made a Major Difference

Karl-Anthony Towns finished with 23 points and 11 rebounds while shooting 11-of-15 from the field.

That is a highly efficient offensive line.

Towns did not need a large number of three-point attempts to make an impact. He attempted only three from beyond the arc and made none, but his interior scoring helped New York maintain pressure against Boston’s frontcourt.

His 11 rebounds were equally important.

New York finished with 43 rebounds compared with Boston’s 31. Towns was one of the biggest contributors to that advantage.

His four turnovers prevented the performance from being perfect, and his individual plus-minus was -1. Still, judging Towns only by plus-minus would miss the broader effect of his offensive efficiency and rebounding.

The Knicks needed a big-man performance capable of keeping Boston from controlling the glass. Towns provided it.

Mikal Bridges Delivered on Both Ends

Mikal Bridges scored 23 points in 44 minutes and added seven rebounds, three assists, four steals, and one block.

His 44 minutes tied Derrick White for the most playing time in the game.

Bridges’ four steals stand out because they demonstrate the defensive side of his contribution. He was not simply a perimeter scorer.

His 11-of-21 shooting was also important. While his three-point shooting was only 1-of-6, he still found ways to score efficiently enough through other areas of the floor.

The +14 plus-minus was the best among the Knicks’ listed players.

That number should not be treated as a perfect measure of individual impact, but in this case it aligns with the broader story. Bridges played heavy minutes, scored efficiently enough, contributed seven rebounds, created turnovers, and remained involved during New York’s second-half surge.

OG Anunoby’s 20 Points Were Timely

OG Anunoby scored 20 points on 8-of-14 shooting.

The most important part of his offensive line was his three-point shooting. He made 4-of-8 attempts from outside.

Anunoby’s 20 points gave New York another efficient scoring option beyond Brunson, Towns, and Bridges.

His contribution became especially important late in the game.

New York’s offense needed timely scoring once Boston’s lead disappeared. Anunoby’s shooting helped prevent the Celtics from focusing all of their defensive attention on Brunson.

That is one of the less obvious reasons why four major Knicks contributors reaching at least 20 points mattered so much.

Boston could not simply remove one player from the equation.

Josh Hart’s Six Points Do Not Tell the Full Story

Josh Hart scored only six points, but his box score was much more productive than the scoring number suggests.

He recorded:

• 9 rebounds
• 5 assists
• 1 steal
• 30 minutes

Hart’s nine rebounds were especially valuable for a guard-forward player.

He also helped New York move the ball with five assists. That combination of rebounding and playmaking allowed the Knicks to get useful contributions without requiring Hart to take a large number of shots.

This is an important principle when reading basketball statistics.

Points are easy to understand, but they do not capture every useful possession.

A six-point performance with nine rebounds and five assists can have a meaningful effect on a playoff game, particularly when the team is already receiving substantial scoring from its leading players.

Boston Celtics Player Stats: Derrick White and Jaylen Brown

Derrick White scored 23 points and shot 6-of-12 from the field and 6-of-11 from three.

His six made three-pointers were a major part of Boston’s perimeter offense.

White also played 44 minutes, matching Bridges for the most in the game.

His 23 points were efficient, but his overall plus-minus was -10. Again, that number does not mean White was ineffective individually. It reflects the fact that Boston was outscored during his minutes despite his scoring.

Jaylen Brown added 20 points, seven rebounds, and two assists.

He shot 7-of-16 from the field and 2-of-8 from three.

Brown’s seven rebounds gave Boston another important contributor on the glass, but four turnovers and five personal fouls limited the overall efficiency of his night.

Boston needed its two-way production to remain consistent after halftime. Instead, New York’s offensive surge changed the game.

Al Horford and Jrue Holiday Had Quiet Offensive Nights

Al Horford finished with five points, five rebounds, four assists, and two steals.

He made only one field goal but contributed in several other areas.

Jrue Holiday scored four points, adding four rebounds and three assists.

The combined scoring from Horford and Holiday was modest, with both players struggling to provide the offensive production that Boston needed outside of Tatum, White, and Brown.

This created an imbalance.

Boston’s top three scorers combined for 85 points. The rest of the listed Celtics contributors produced much less scoring.

New York’s four main scorers, by comparison, produced 105 points.

That distribution mattered because playoff defenses often force stars into difficult decisions. A team with more reliable secondary scoring can punish defensive attention directed toward its primary creator.

Kristaps Porzingis’ Limited Offensive Impact

Kristaps Porzingis played 24 minutes and scored seven points.

He shot 2-of-6 from the field and 0-of-2 from three, while adding four rebounds, one steal, and three offensive rebounds.

The three offensive rebounds were useful, particularly against a Knicks team that won the overall rebounding battle.

However, Porzingis did not provide the floor spacing or scoring volume Boston would have wanted from a player with his offensive skill set.

His three offensive rebounds show that he was still involved physically around the basket, but his seven points meant Boston did not receive a major scoring contribution from him.

Team Shooting Explains Part of the Result

The team shooting numbers provide another important layer.

Boston:

• 38-of-79 from the field
• 48 percent overall
• 18-of-48 from three
• 38 percent from three
• 19-of-26 at the free-throw line
• 73 percent from the free-throw line

New York:

• 50-of-92 from the field
• 54 percent overall
• 12-of-34 from three
• 35 percent from three
• 9-of-12 at the free-throw line
• 75 percent from the free-throw line

Boston actually had the better three-point percentage.

That is an important detail because it shows that the Knicks did not win simply by becoming a better three-point shooting team.

Instead, New York made 12 more field goals overall.

The Knicks attempted 92 shots compared with Boston’s 79. That 13-shot difference is enormous in a playoff game.

Even with Boston shooting better from three, New York created more total scoring opportunities and converted them at a higher overall field-goal rate.

The Rebounding Battle Was a Major Advantage

New York won the rebounding battle 43-31.

That is a 12-rebound advantage.

The offensive rebounding numbers were even more revealing.

New York collected 13 offensive rebounds compared with Boston’s seven.

That gave the Knicks additional possessions and prevented Boston from ending several defensive sequences cleanly.

Second-chance opportunities can become especially valuable when a team is struggling to score consistently. An offensive rebound gives the offense another opportunity without requiring a new defensive possession.

New York’s 13 offensive rebounds therefore contributed to the larger possession advantage.

Towns had 11 total rebounds, Hart had nine, Bridges had seven, and Achiuwa added eight despite playing 25 minutes.

That was a strong collective effort.

Points in the Paint Showed New York’s Offensive Approach

The Knicks scored 64 points in the paint.

Boston scored 32.

That is a 32-point advantage inside the paint.

This may be one of the most important statistics in the entire game.

Boston was excellent from three-point range, making 18 three-pointers. New York made only 12.

But New York compensated by attacking closer to the basket and converting a much larger number of two-point opportunities.

The Knicks’ 54 percent field-goal percentage reflects that success.

This is a useful reminder that a team does not have to win the three-point battle to win a modern NBA playoff game.

New York found another path to efficient offense.

The Third Quarter Changed Everything

The first half belonged to Boston.

The Celtics scored 39 points in the opening quarter and added 23 in the second.

New York scored 28 and 23.

At halftime, Boston led 62-51.

The third quarter completely changed the direction of the game.

New York scored 37 points.

Boston scored 23.

The Knicks therefore erased most of the deficit in a single quarter and entered the fourth with momentum.

The full second-half numbers are even more striking.

Boston scored 51 points after halftime.

New York scored 70.

That 19-point second-half advantage explains the final result better than almost any individual box-score statistic.

Boston’s offense was not terrible after halftime. Fifty-one points is a respectable total.

New York was simply much better.

New York’s Ball Movement Was More Effective

The Knicks finished with 25 assists compared with Boston’s 15.

That is a 10-assist advantage.

Brunson’s 12 assists were the foundation, but the overall team number demonstrates that New York was not relying solely on isolation scoring.

Hart contributed five assists.

Brunson and Hart combined for 17 assists.

That created opportunities for Towns, Bridges, Anunoby, and other players to attack favorable situations.

Boston’s 15 assists indicate a less balanced distribution of playmaking.

Tatum had four assists, Horford had four, and Holiday had three, but the Celtics did not match New York’s overall passing production.

Turnovers Were Even

One of the interesting aspects of the game is that turnovers did not decide the contest.

Both teams committed 12 turnovers.

That means New York did not win because Boston simply gave the ball away more often.

Instead, the Knicks won through shooting volume, rebounding, paint scoring, and second-half execution.

This distinction is important when analyzing playoff games.

When turnovers are equal, other possession factors become more significant. New York’s 13 offensive rebounds and higher total field-goal attempts helped explain why the Knicks generated more opportunities.

The Plus-Minus Numbers Need Context

Plus-minus can be useful, but it should never be read in isolation.

For New York, Bridges had the best listed figure at +14, followed by Brunson at +12 and Hart at +8.

For Boston, several key players finished in negative territory:

• Tatum: -9
• White: -10
• Brown: -1
• Horford: -8
• Holiday: -12

At first glance, Tatum’s -9 might seem strange next to his 42 points.

But the number makes sense when viewed alongside the game’s second-half flow.

A player can score at an elite level while the opposing team wins the minutes around him.

Plus-minus is therefore best used as supporting evidence rather than a standalone player rating.

Why the Knicks Won Despite Tatum’s 42 Points

The simplest explanation is that New York won the team-level battle.

Boston had the game’s top scorer.

New York had the better overall offensive structure.

The Knicks:

• Shot 54 percent from the field.
• Grabbed 43 rebounds.
• Collected 13 offensive rebounds.
• Recorded 25 assists.
• Scored 64 points in the paint.
• Scored 70 second-half points.
• Had four players score at least 20 points.

Boston:

• Shot 48 percent overall.
• Grabbed 31 rebounds.
• Collected seven offensive rebounds.
• Recorded 15 assists.
• Scored 32 points in the paint.
• Scored 51 second-half points.
• Had three players score at least 20 points.

That is the difference between an exceptional individual performance and an exceptional team performance.

Tatum’s 42 points kept Boston competitive.

New York’s balance allowed the Knicks to win.

What the Stats Say About Jalen Brunson vs Jayson Tatum

Comparing Brunson and Tatum is one of the most natural ways to interpret the game.

Tatum had:

• 42 points
• 8 rebounds
• 4 assists
• 4 steals
• 2 blocks
• 16-of-28 shooting
• 7-of-16 from three

Brunson had:

• 39 points
• 5 rebounds
• 12 assists
• 1 turnover
• 14-of-25 shooting
• 4-of-8 from three

Tatum clearly won the scoring battle by three points.

Brunson won the playmaking battle by a significant margin.

Tatum’s defensive statistics were also impressive, with four steals and two blocks.

Brunson’s one turnover compared with Tatum’s four is another meaningful difference.

There is no need to label one performance as simply good and the other as bad. Both stars were outstanding.

The more useful conclusion is that they influenced the game in different ways.

Tatum was Boston’s primary offensive force.

Brunson was both New York’s leading scorer and its primary offensive organizer.

What the Game Reveals About Playoff Basketball

This matchup offers several useful lessons for anyone studying NBA player statistics.

Scoring alone does not explain winning

Tatum scored 42, yet Boston lost by eight.

That does not make scoring unimportant. It shows that scoring must be evaluated alongside shooting efficiency, rebounding, playmaking, turnovers, defense, and team context.

Efficiency can beat volume

Towns scored 23 points on 11-of-15 shooting.

He did not need 20 or 25 attempts to reach his total.

His efficiency allowed New York to get strong production without consuming a huge portion of the team’s possessions.

Rebounding creates extra opportunities

New York’s 13 offensive rebounds helped increase its number of possessions.

Those additional opportunities matter even when three-point shooting is not dominant.

Playmaking changes defensive pressure

Brunson’s 12 assists meant Boston could not focus exclusively on preventing him from scoring.

When a high-volume scorer also creates easy opportunities for teammates, defensive schemes become harder to maintain.

Second-half performance can outweigh first-half dominance

Boston controlled the opening half.

New York controlled the second half.

The Knicks ultimately won because the game is decided over 48 minutes, not 24.

A Closer Look at New York’s Supporting Cast

The supporting cast deserves more attention than it usually receives in a star-focused box-score discussion.

Anunoby’s 20 points gave New York another efficient scorer.

Bridges added 23 points, seven rebounds, and four steals.

Towns contributed 23 points and 11 rebounds.

Hart added nine rebounds and five assists despite scoring only six points.

Achiuwa provided eight rebounds in 25 minutes.

McBride added two made three-pointers in limited offensive action.

This distribution made the Knicks difficult to defend.

If Boston committed additional attention to Brunson, another player could attack.

If the defense collapsed toward the paint, New York had perimeter shooting.

If Boston secured the first defensive stop, the Knicks could still generate extra chances through offensive rebounding.

That variety is one of the strongest explanations for the comeback.

A Closer Look at Boston’s Supporting Cast

Boston’s supporting production was more uneven.

White was excellent as a perimeter shooter, making six three-pointers.

Brown contributed 20 points and seven rebounds.

Horford helped as a passer and rebounder.

Holiday provided four rebounds and three assists.

Porzingis collected three offensive rebounds.

But the Celtics did not receive the same combination of scoring depth and interior production that New York generated.

Boston’s 18 made three-pointers were impressive, yet its 32 points in the paint were half of New York’s total.

That offensive profile became a problem when the Knicks began making shots at a high rate during the second half.

The Importance of New York’s 54 Percent Shooting

Shooting 54 percent from the field is one of the clearest indicators of why New York won.

The Knicks attempted 92 field goals and made 50.

Boston attempted 79 and made 38.

The 12 made-field-goal difference is substantial.

New York also made 12 three-pointers, meaning 38 of its 50 made baskets came from inside the arc.

That matches the 64 points in the paint and shows that the Knicks were consistently successful attacking the interior.

Boston’s 18 made threes kept the Celtics within striking distance, but the Knicks’ overall field-goal production eventually became too much.

Game Flow in Four Quarters

First Quarter

Boston started aggressively and scored 39 points.

New York managed 28.

The Celtics’ early offensive efficiency gave them control and created the impression that the game could follow the pattern of earlier matchups in the series.

Second Quarter

Boston added another 23 points while New York scored 23.

The Knicks did not lose additional ground, but they entered halftime trailing 62-51.

Third Quarter

The game changed dramatically.

New York scored 37 points while Boston managed 23.

Brunson became a major driver of the comeback, and the Knicks’ offensive execution improved across the quarter.

Fourth Quarter

New York scored 33 points and Boston scored 28.

The Knicks maintained the pressure and ultimately finished with a 121-113 victory.

The quarter-by-quarter progression therefore looks like this:

Quarter	Boston	New York	Difference
1st	39	28	Boston +11
2nd	23	23	Even
3rd	23	37	New York +14
4th	28	33	New York +5
Final	113	121	New York +8

The numbers make the comeback easy to visualize.

Boston dominated the first quarter.

New York dominated the second half.

Series Implications

The victory gave New York a 3-1 series lead.

That meant the Knicks were one victory away from advancing.

Boston, meanwhile, faced a difficult situation. The Celtics needed to win the next game to extend the series.

The Game 4 statistics also raised another major question because of Tatum’s late-game injury.

His 42-point performance demonstrated how important he was to Boston’s offense. His availability therefore became a central issue for the Celtics moving forward.

The statistical lesson is straightforward: Boston had just received an enormous scoring performance from its star and still lost.

That made the margin for error even smaller.

How to Read These Player Stats Correctly

If you are comparing player performances from this game, it is better to use several categories rather than looking only at points.

Start with scoring volume.

Then examine field-goal efficiency.

After that, look at three-point shooting, rebounds, assists, turnovers, steals, blocks, and plus-minus.

Finally, compare the player’s numbers with the team’s overall performance.

For example, Tatum’s 42 points look extraordinary because they are extraordinary.

But Brunson’s 39 points become even more valuable when combined with 12 assists and only one turnover.

Similarly, Hart’s six points look modest until you add nine rebounds and five assists.

Towns’ 23 points become more impressive when paired with 11 rebounds and 11-of-15 shooting.

This approach gives a much more complete picture of player impact.

Key Statistical Takeaways

The most important numbers from Game 4 were:

1. New York won 121-113.
2. The Knicks took a 3-1 series lead.
3. Jayson Tatum led all scorers with 42 points.
4. Jalen Brunson scored 39 points and recorded 12 assists.
5. New York shot 54 percent from the field.
6. Boston shot 48 percent from the field.
7. New York won the rebounding battle 43-31.
8. New York had 13 offensive rebounds.
9. The Knicks scored 64 points in the paint.
10. New York recorded 25 assists compared with Boston’s 15.
11. Both teams committed 12 turnovers.
12. Boston made 18 three-pointers compared with New York’s 12.
13. New York outscored Boston 70-51 in the second half.
14. Towns recorded 23 points and 11 rebounds.
15. Bridges recorded 23 points, seven rebounds, four steals, and a +14 plus-minus.
16. OG Anunoby scored 20 points on 8-of-14 shooting.
17. Derrick White scored 23 points while making six three-pointers.
18. Jaylen Brown finished with 20 points and seven rebounds.

Taken together, these statistics explain why the Knicks won even though Boston had the game’s highest individual scorer.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who scored the most points in Knicks vs Celtics Game 4?

Jayson Tatum was the game’s leading scorer with 42 points for Boston. Jalen Brunson led New York with 39 points.

What were Jalen Brunson’s stats against Boston in Game 4?

Brunson finished with 39 points, 12 assists, five rebounds, 14-of-25 shooting, 4-of-8 from three-point range, 7-of-9 free throws, and only one turnover.

What were Jayson Tatum’s stats against the Knicks in Game 4?

Tatum recorded 42 points, eight rebounds, four assists, four steals, two blocks, and four turnovers. He shot 16-of-28 from the field and 7-of-16 from three.

Which team had better shooting statistics?

New York had the better overall field-goal percentage at 54 percent compared with Boston’s 48 percent. Boston had the better three-point percentage, shooting 38 percent compared with New York’s 35 percent.

Who led the Knicks in rebounds?

Karl-Anthony Towns led New York with 11 rebounds. Josh Hart had nine, Precious Achiuwa had eight, and Mikal Bridges had seven.

Why did the Knicks win despite Tatum scoring 42 points?

New York won because of its overall team production. The Knicks shot 54 percent, outrebounded Boston 43-31, scored 64 points in the paint, recorded 25 assists, collected 13 offensive rebounds, and outscored Boston 70-51 in the second half.

Conclusion

The most important lesson from the Knicks vs boston celtics match player stats is that Game 4 was not decided by one superstar.

Jayson Tatum produced 42 points and one of the strongest individual scoring performances of the matchup. Derrick White added 23 points, while Jaylen Brown scored 20. Boston also made 18 three-pointers.

Yet New York found more ways to win possessions.

Jalen Brunson combined 39 points with 12 assists and just one turnover. Karl-Anthony Towns added 23 points and 11 rebounds. Mikal Bridges produced 23 points, seven rebounds, four steals, and a +14 plus-minus. OG Anunoby scored 20 points while Josh Hart contributed nine rebounds and five assists.

The Knicks also shot 54 percent from the field, won the rebounding battle by 12, collected 13 offensive rebounds, scored 64 points in the paint, and finished with a 25-15 advantage in assists.

Most importantly, New York transformed the game after halftime.

Boston led 62-51 at the break, but the Knicks responded by scoring 37 points in the third quarter and 33 in the fourth. The resulting 70-51 second-half advantage turned a double-digit deficit into an eight-point victory.

That is why the box score is more revealing than the headline scoring totals alone.

Tatum had the highest individual point total. Brunson had the stronger combination of scoring and playmaking. Towns controlled the glass. Bridges contributed across several categories. Anunoby supplied efficient scoring. Hart filled multiple statistical gaps.

The result was a complete team performance that pushed New York to a 3-1 series lead.

For anyone studying this game through player statistics, the clearest conclusion is that individual scoring tells only part of the story. Shooting efficiency, rebounding, assists, offensive rebounds, paint scoring, turnovers, and second-half execution all combined to explain how the Knicks turned Game 4 around and moved to the brink of the next round.

The supplied Game 4 data therefore paints a clear picture: Boston had the biggest individual scoring performance, but New York produced the more complete 48-minute team performance.