49ers vs Cleveland Browns Match Player Stats
The 49ers vs cleveland browns match player stats from the November 30, 2025 Week 13 meeting tell a more interesting story than the final 26-8 score alone. San Francisco defeated Cleveland at Huntington Bank Field, but the game was not simply a case of one offense dominating every category. The Browns actually produced more rushing yards and finished with slightly more total yards, while San Francisco won because it converted opportunities more efficiently, protected the football, controlled key downs, and produced points when possessions mattered most. The official NFL game center confirms the 26-8 result and the quarter-by-quarter scoring pattern.
For readers researching individual performances, the 49ers vs cleveland browns match player stats are especially useful because several players produced numbers that require context. Christian McCaffrey scored a rushing touchdown but averaged only 2.7 yards per carry. George Kittle led San Francisco in receiving yards with 67, while Jauan Jennings supplied the team’s passing touchdown. For Cleveland, Quinshon Judkins ran for 91 yards on 23 carries, yet the Browns were unable to turn their rushing success into points after the second quarter.
This breakdown examines the box score from the perspective of what actually decided the game. Instead of simply repeating player totals, it connects passing, rushing, receiving, defense, special teams, turnovers, third-down efficiency, and scoring efficiency to explain why San Francisco left Cleveland with a 26-8 victory.
49ers vs cleveland browns match player stats at a glance
The game was played on November 30, 2025, with San Francisco entering at 8-4 and Cleveland at 3-8. After the result, the 49ers moved to 9-4 while the Browns fell to 3-9. The official NFL schedule records the Week 13 matchup as a 26-8 San Francisco victory.
| Category | San Francisco 49ers | Cleveland Browns |
| Final Score | 26 | 8 |
| Total Yards | 252 | 253 |
| Passing Yards | 161 | 115 |
| Rushing Yards | 91 | 138 |
| First Downs | 19 | 15 |
| Third Down | 11/17 | 3/11 |
| Fourth Down | 0/0 | 0/4 |
| Offensive Plays | 64 | 60 |
| Turnovers Lost | 0 | 2 |
| Sacks | 3 | 1 |
| QB Hits | 6 | 7 |
| Penalties | 3 for 11 yards | 4 for 25 yards |
| Time of Possession | 30:10 | 29:50 |
| Touchdowns | 3 | 1 |
| Field Goals | 2/2 | 0 |
| Red Zone | 3/5 | 0/0 |
One of the most important observations is that total yardage was almost identical. Cleveland actually finished with one more total yard than San Francisco, 253 to 252. That immediately shows why raw yardage alone cannot explain the result. The 49ers were much better at converting possessions into points.
San Francisco 49ers offensive player stats
San Francisco’s offense produced 252 total yards on 64 offensive plays. The team generated 161 net passing yards and 91 rushing yards. Brock Purdy completed 16 of 29 passes for 168 gross passing yards, one touchdown, and no interceptions, while the team finished with 161 net passing yards after a seven-yard sack. The official individual statistics list Purdy with an 83.7 passer rating.
Brock Purdy passing performance
Brock Purdy’s final numbers were:
- 16 completions
- 29 attempts
- 168 passing yards
- 1 passing touchdown
- 0 interceptions
- 33-yard longest completion
- 1 sack for 7 yards
- 83.7 passer rating
On paper, those numbers are solid rather than spectacular. However, the context matters.
The NFL’s Week 13 analysis noted that Purdy looked significantly more comfortable than he had in the previous game. The official recap specifically highlighted his ability to navigate the pocket and make throws despite Cleveland’s pass rush and difficult late-November conditions.
That distinction is important when analyzing quarterback statistics. A quarterback does not need 300 yards to play an effective game. Purdy avoided interceptions, made enough high-value throws, and helped San Francisco maintain offensive efficiency.
The 49ers also used Christian McCaffrey for one passing attempt, which was incomplete. That explains why the team passing line was 16 completions on 30 attempts even though Purdy himself attempted 29 passes.
Christian McCaffrey’s rushing impact
Christian McCaffrey carried the ball 20 times for 53 yards and one touchdown.
His rushing line:
- 20 carries
- 53 yards
- 2.7 yards per carry
- 7-yard longest run
- 1 rushing touchdown
A 2.7-yard average is not eye-catching, but judging McCaffrey only by his rushing average would miss his overall contribution.
He also caught four passes for 21 yards. That gave him 74 total yards from scrimmage, along with his rushing touchdown.
The more revealing point is workload. McCaffrey accounted for 20 of San Francisco’s 33 rushing attempts. The 49ers continued to use their premier offensive weapon even when Cleveland’s defense limited the efficiency of individual runs.
That helped San Francisco maintain balance and prevented the offense from becoming completely dependent on the passing game.
Brian Robinson Jr. adds support
Brian Robinson Jr. carried eight times for 26 yards.
His average of 3.3 yards per carry was modest, but his eight carries were valuable in keeping the running game active behind McCaffrey.
Demarcus Robinson added one carry for six yards, while Brock Purdy rushed twice for four yards and one touchdown. Mac Jones also recorded two rushing attempts for two yards.
The result was 33 team rushing attempts for 91 yards and two touchdowns.
George Kittle leads the receiving group
George Kittle was San Francisco’s leading receiver by yardage.
His production:
- 4 receptions
- 67 yards
- 16.8 yards per reception
- 33-yard longest reception
- 0 touchdowns
Kittle’s 67 yards represented 39.9 percent of San Francisco’s 168 receiving yards.
The most significant feature of his performance was efficiency. Four receptions produced 67 yards, meaning San Francisco found substantial yardage through a relatively small number of completions.
His 33-yard reception was also the longest completed pass recorded by the 49ers.
Jauan Jennings supplies the touchdown
Jauan Jennings finished with:
- 4 receptions
- 39 yards
- 9.8 yards per reception
- 13-yard longest reception
- 1 touchdown
Jennings was the only San Francisco receiver to catch a touchdown pass.
His four receptions matched Kittle and McCaffrey for the team lead in catches. That distribution demonstrates that the 49ers did not rely on one receiver for every passing situation.
Other San Francisco receiving statistics
Kyle Juszczyk caught two passes for 27 yards, giving him an impressive 13.5 yards per reception.
McCaffrey added four catches for 21 yards.
Ricky Pearsall recorded two receptions for 14 yards.
The team receiving total was 16 receptions for 168 yards and one touchdown. The official NFL individual statistics also show targets for the San Francisco receivers, providing useful context about how the passing workload was distributed.
Cleveland Browns offensive player stats
Cleveland’s offensive numbers create one of the biggest statistical contrasts in the game.
The Browns produced 253 total yards, one more than San Francisco. They also rushed for 138 yards compared with San Francisco’s 91.
Yet Cleveland scored only eight points.
That gap between yardage and scoring efficiency is one of the central lessons from this matchup.
Shedeur Sanders passing performance
Shedeur Sanders completed 16 of 25 passes for 149 yards and one touchdown with no interceptions.
His passing line included:
- 16 completions
- 25 attempts
- 149 gross passing yards
- 1 touchdown
- 0 interceptions
Dillon Gabriel also attempted one pass and did not complete it for positive yardage, leaving Cleveland with 17 completions on 26 team attempts.
The Browns therefore completed 65.4 percent of their team passes, but their passing attack generated only 115 net yards after accounting for sacks.
The absence of an interception is worth noting. Cleveland’s problem was not simply that Sanders threw the ball away to San Francisco defenders. The Browns instead struggled to convert offensive production into points.
Quinshon Judkins leads the rushing attack
Quinshon Judkins was Cleveland’s most productive rusher.
He recorded:
- 23 carries
- 91 yards
- 4.0 yards per carry
- 17-yard longest run
- 0 rushing touchdowns
Judkins accounted for almost two-thirds of Cleveland’s 31 rushing attempts.
His 91 yards were also equal to the entire San Francisco team rushing total.
That is a major statistical detail because it shows that Cleveland’s running game was not the primary reason the Browns lost. The bigger problem was what happened after the yardage was gained.
Judkins also caught three passes for 18 yards, giving him 109 total yards from scrimmage.
Dylan Sampson provides efficiency
Dylan Sampson carried four times for 23 yards.
That produced a strong 5.8-yard rushing average.
Malachi Corley and Isaiah Bond each added nine rushing yards on one carry, while Shedeur Sanders rushed once for six yards. Harold Fannin Jr. had one rushing attempt for no gain.
The Browns finished with 31 rushing attempts for 138 yards, averaging 4.5 yards per carry.
That is an efficient rushing performance by conventional standards.
Cleveland receiving statistics
Harold Fannin Jr. led Cleveland’s receiving group with three receptions for 43 yards and one touchdown.
His line:
- 3 receptions
- 43 yards
- 14.3 yards per reception
- 1 touchdown
Fannin’s touchdown was the only Browns touchdown of the game.
Jerry Jeudy caught three passes for 26 yards.
Gage Larvadain recorded two receptions for 23 yards.
Isaiah Bond caught one pass for 18 yards.
Quinshon Judkins added three receptions for 18 yards.
Jerome Ford caught three passes for 17 yards.
David Njoku recorded two receptions for four yards.
The Browns finished with 17 receptions for 149 receiving yards and one touchdown according to the supplied game data.
The distribution shows that Cleveland did not have a single receiver completely take over the game. Instead, several players contributed modest amounts while Fannin produced the biggest scoring play.
49ers vs cleveland browns match player stats and the rushing battle
At first glance, the rushing statistics favor Cleveland.
The Browns produced 138 rushing yards on 31 attempts, averaging 4.5 yards per carry.
The 49ers produced 91 yards on 33 attempts, averaging 2.8 yards per carry.
That is a substantial advantage for Cleveland.
Yet the Browns still lost by 18 points.
This is an excellent example of why football analysis needs more than one box-score category. Cleveland moved the ball effectively on the ground but failed to convert its offensive opportunities into touchdowns or field goals.
San Francisco’s rushing attack was less efficient, but it produced two rushing touchdowns.
That difference is enormous.
McCaffrey scored one rushing touchdown, while Purdy added another. Cleveland’s running backs generated yards but no rushing touchdowns.
The third-down difference explains a lot
One of the clearest statistical separators was third-down performance.
San Francisco converted 11 of 17 third downs.
That is 64.7 percent.
Cleveland converted only 3 of 11.
That is 27.3 percent.
The gap is 37.4 percentage points.
This is one of the strongest explanations for why two teams with nearly identical total yardage finished with an 18-point scoring difference.
Third-down conversion extends drives. Extended drives create more opportunities for touchdowns, field goals, clock control, and field position.
San Francisco’s 11 successful third-down conversions helped the 49ers keep possession and sustain scoring drives.
Cleveland repeatedly found itself in situations where it needed another successful play to continue a possession and could not produce it often enough.
Fourth-down execution was another major separator
The Browns were 0-for-4 on fourth down.
San Francisco did not attempt a fourth-down conversion.
That distinction matters because Cleveland repeatedly had to make high-leverage decisions on fourth down.
A team that fails on all four fourth-down attempts effectively gives away valuable possessions.
The supplied team statistics also show that Cleveland had only 15 first downs compared with San Francisco’s 19.
The Browns’ offense could generate yards, but it had difficulty turning those yards into sustained drives.
Turnovers changed the game
Cleveland lost two fumbles.
San Francisco lost none.
Neither team recorded an interception.
That creates a very specific turnover profile:
| Turnover category | 49ers | Browns |
| Interceptions thrown | 0 | 0 |
| Interceptions made | 0 | 0 |
| Fumbles lost | 0 | 2 |
| Total turnovers lost | 0 | 2 |
Gage Larvadain was credited with three fumbles, one of which was lost, while Harold Fannin Jr. lost another.
This is crucial because Cleveland’s two lost fumbles came without San Francisco needing to intercept a pass.
Ball security therefore became a major part of the scoring equation.
San Francisco’s offense did not give Cleveland a comparable gift.
The difference between zero and two turnovers is particularly important in a game decided by 18 points.
Defensive player and team statistics
The defensive numbers also deserve careful interpretation.
San Francisco recorded:
- 69 total tackles
- 38 solo tackles
- 3 sacks
- 5 tackles for loss
- 1 pass defended
- 6 quarterback hits
Cleveland recorded:
- 73 total tackles
- 28 solo tackles
- 1 sack
- 4 tackles for loss
- 3 passes defended
- 7 quarterback hits
Cleveland actually recorded more total tackles and more quarterback hits.
That suggests the Browns defense was involved throughout the game rather than simply being overwhelmed from start to finish.
The more meaningful difference was what happened on the scoreboard and on critical downs.
San Francisco produced three sacks compared with one for Cleveland. The 49ers also created more tackles for loss.
The Browns defense had seven quarterback hits, showing that it was capable of generating pressure. But pressure did not translate into turnovers, and the 49ers ultimately protected the football.
Why Cleveland’s defense looked better than the final score
The final score can make a defense look much worse than its actual performance.
The official NFL Week 13 analysis specifically noted that Cleveland’s defense kept the Browns within striking distance for a significant part of the game. The Browns forced four punts on San Francisco’s first six possessions and did so without recording a takeaway.
That is a valuable distinction.
San Francisco eventually scored 26 points, but Cleveland’s defense did not spend the entire game being dominated.
Instead, the Browns defense had stretches where it successfully stopped the 49ers.
The problem was that Cleveland’s offense could not consistently capitalize.
This is why a box-score review should separate defensive performance from overall team performance.
Quarter-by-quarter scoring analysis
San Francisco scored in every quarter.
Cleveland scored only in the second quarter.
First quarter
San Francisco opened the game with seven points.
Cleveland scored zero.
The official NFL game center records an eight-play, 16-yard touchdown drive for San Francisco in the opening quarter.
Second quarter
Cleveland responded with eight points, taking the score to 8-7.
San Francisco then added a field goal to move ahead 10-8.
This was the last time Cleveland scored.
Third quarter
San Francisco added seven points and extended the advantage to 17-8.
Cleveland failed to score.
Fourth quarter
The 49ers added nine points in the final quarter, finishing with 26.
Cleveland again failed to score.
The final scoring sequence was therefore:
| Quarter | 49ers | Browns |
| Q1 | 7 | 0 |
| Q2 | 3 | 8 |
| Q3 | 7 | 0 |
| Q4 | 9 | 0 |
| Total | 26 | 8 |
The scoring pattern tells the story of a San Francisco team that kept producing points after halftime while Cleveland’s offense completely stalled.
San Francisco’s red-zone efficiency
San Francisco entered the red zone five times and scored touchdowns on three of those trips.
That produced a 60 percent red-zone touchdown rate.
The team also recorded 75 percent goal-to-go efficiency, scoring touchdowns on three of four goal-to-go opportunities.
Cleveland had no red-zone scoring opportunities recorded in the supplied team statistics.
That statistic may seem surprising given Cleveland’s 253 total yards, but it reinforces the central point: the Browns could move the football without consistently moving it into scoring territory.
This is one of the biggest reasons the total-yardage numbers are misleading if viewed alone.
Special teams played a meaningful supporting role
San Francisco’s special teams production included an excellent punt-return performance from Skyy Moore.
Moore recorded:
- 3 punt returns
- 69 yards
- 23.0-yard average
- 66-yard longest return
He also had one kickoff return for 24 yards.
A 66-yard punt return is especially important because it can dramatically improve starting field position even without producing a touchdown.
Matt Gay converted both of his field-goal attempts and both extra-point attempts.
His scoring contribution was eight points.
Thomas Morstead punted five times for 178 yards, averaging 35.6 yards per punt with three punts placed inside the 20-yard line.
For Cleveland, Corey Bojorquez punted four times for 178 yards, averaging 44.5 yards with a 49-yard long.
Malachi Corley handled Cleveland’s kickoff returns, recording four returns for 73 yards.
Gage Larvadain returned three punts for only three yards.
Field position and hidden yardage
Special teams statistics can be easy to overlook when researching 49ers vs cleveland browns match player stats, but they provide additional context.
San Francisco generated 69 punt-return yards.
Cleveland generated only three.
That is a 66-yard difference in punt-return yardage alone.
San Francisco also avoided the turnover problems that damaged Cleveland.
These hidden-yardage categories do not always appear prominently in fantasy discussions, but they influence where offensive drives begin.
A team that repeatedly starts drives in better field position needs fewer successful plays to reach scoring range.
Total offense versus scoring efficiency
The most interesting statistical comparison from this matchup is:
Cleveland: 253 total yards
San Francisco: 252 total yards
Yet:
San Francisco: 26 points
Cleveland: 8 points
That is a 25-point scoring difference despite only a one-yard difference in total offense.
How can that happen?
The answer is a combination of:
- Third-down efficiency
- Turnover differential
- Red-zone production
- Touchdown conversion
- Fourth-down failures
- Punt-return yardage
- San Francisco’s ability to sustain scoring drives
This is precisely why player statistics should be interpreted alongside team efficiency metrics.
The most important individual performances
Christian McCaffrey
McCaffrey’s 53 rushing yards were not spectacular, but his 20 carries and rushing touchdown made him an important part of San Francisco’s offensive plan.
His four receptions for 21 yards also brought his scrimmage production to 74 yards.
Brock Purdy
Purdy completed 16 of 29 passes for 168 yards, one touchdown, and no interceptions.
His value came from efficiency, ball security, and timely execution rather than volume.
George Kittle
Kittle led all San Francisco receivers with 67 yards on four receptions.
His 33-yard catch supplied the biggest individual receiving play for the 49ers.
Jauan Jennings
Jennings caught four passes for 39 yards and scored San Francisco’s passing touchdown.
He was one of the team’s most important scoring contributors.
Quinshon Judkins
Judkins was arguably Cleveland’s strongest offensive producer.
He rushed 23 times for 91 yards and added three receptions for 18 yards.
His 109 yards from scrimmage were a strong individual performance despite the team’s inability to score consistently.
Harold Fannin Jr.
Fannin produced three receptions for 43 yards and Cleveland’s only touchdown.
His receiving production made him one of the Browns’ most productive pass catchers.
What the stats say about each team
San Francisco 49ers
The 49ers did not dominate every statistical category.
- They were outgained on the ground.
- They finished with fewer total yards.
- They had fewer total tackles.
- They did not create an interception.
Yet they won convincingly.
Their advantage came from efficiency.
San Francisco converted 64.7 percent of its third downs, scored three touchdowns in the red zone, lost no fumbles, and scored in every quarter.
That is the profile of a team that consistently made important plays even without producing enormous yardage totals.
Cleveland Browns
Cleveland’s performance was more complicated.
The Browns rushed for 138 yards and finished with 253 total yards.
Judkins ran effectively.
Sanders avoided interceptions.
The defense recorded seven quarterback hits.
The team even had a stretch where it held San Francisco’s offense in check.
But Cleveland could not finish drives.
The Browns went 3-for-11 on third down and 0-for-4 on fourth down. They also lost two fumbles.
That combination made it difficult to convert offensive production into points.
What these stats mean for evaluating player performance
A common mistake in sports analysis is to treat the biggest number as the most important number.
For example, Cleveland’s 138 rushing yards look better than San Francisco’s 91.
But San Francisco scored two rushing touchdowns.
Similarly, Cleveland’s defense recorded seven quarterback hits compared with San Francisco’s six, yet the 49ers produced three sacks and prevented Cleveland from sustaining scoring drives.
The better approach is to ask three questions:
- How much production did the player generate?
- How efficiently did the player generate it?
- Did that production contribute to winning possessions and points?
That framework provides a more useful reading of the 49ers vs cleveland browns match player stats than simply sorting players by yards.
A closer look at the quarterback comparison
| Statistic | Brock Purdy | Shedeur Sanders |
| Completions | 16 | 16 |
| Attempts | 29 | 25 |
| Completion Rate | 55.2% | 64.0% |
| Passing Yards | 168 | 149 |
| TD Passes | 1 | 1 |
| INTs | 0 | 0 |
| Longest Completion | 33 | Not provided in supplied data |
| Sacks | 1 | 3 |
| Net Passing | 161 | 115 |
Sanders had the higher completion percentage, but Purdy produced more gross and net passing yards and took fewer sacks.
The most important difference was not necessarily traditional quarterback efficiency. It was how each passing game connected to overall offensive success.
San Francisco converted 11 of 17 third downs.
Cleveland converted only three of 11.
That difference placed very different demands on the two quarterbacks.
A closer look at the leading running backs
| Player | Carries | Rushing Yards | Average | TDs |
| Christian McCaffrey | 20 | 53 | 2.7 | 1 |
| Quinshon Judkins | 23 | 91 | 4.0 | 0 |
| Brian Robinson Jr. | 8 | 26 | 3.3 | 0 |
| Dylan Sampson | 4 | 23 | 5.8 | 0 |
Judkins clearly had the stronger rushing efficiency.
However, McCaffrey scored.
That difference is a perfect example of why rushing average and scoring production should be examined together.
A closer look at receiving leaders
| Player | Receptions | Receiving Yards | TDs |
| George Kittle | 4 | 67 | 0 |
| Jauan Jennings | 4 | 39 | 1 |
| Harold Fannin Jr. | 3 | 43 | 1 |
| Jerry Jeudy | 3 | 26 | 0 |
| Kyle Juszczyk | 2 | 27 | 0 |
| Christian McCaffrey | 4 | 21 | 0 |
Kittle led San Francisco in receiving yardage, while Jennings provided the team’s passing touchdown.
For Cleveland, Fannin was the only Browns player besides the running game to score a touchdown.
Why the 26-8 score can be misleading
A casual reader might look at 26-8 and assume San Francisco completely controlled every part of the game.
The statistics do not support that conclusion.
Cleveland:
- Outrushed San Francisco by 47 yards
- Finished with one more total yard
- Had seven quarterback hits
- Had more total tackles
- Completed passes at a higher percentage
Yet Cleveland lost by 18 points.
The difference was situational execution.
San Francisco was much better on third down, avoided turnovers, converted red-zone chances, and maintained scoring momentum throughout the second half.
That is the deeper lesson from the box score.
How to use these statistics for fantasy and player evaluation
These statistics can also help readers evaluate individual fantasy performances, although fantasy scoring systems vary.
McCaffrey’s 20 carries and four receptions demonstrate a substantial workload even though his rushing efficiency was modest.
Kittle’s four receptions for 67 yards show strong receiving efficiency.
Jennings’ touchdown gave him additional scoring value beyond his 39 receiving yards.
Judkins’ 91 rushing yards plus 18 receiving yards indicate a substantial all-purpose workload.
Fannin’s touchdown made his three-catch performance more valuable than the raw reception total might suggest.
For future evaluations, workload should be considered alongside efficiency and scoring opportunities.
What stands out most from the official game data
The official NFL game book provides several statistics that are easy to miss in a conventional player summary. San Francisco had 19 first downs compared with Cleveland’s 15. The 49ers converted 11 of 17 third downs, while the Browns converted three of 11. San Francisco also held a 30:10 to 29:50 edge in time of possession.
Those numbers demonstrate that possession time was almost perfectly balanced.
The game was therefore not decided because San Francisco simply held the ball for much longer.
Instead, the 49ers were more productive during their possessions.
That is a much more useful insight for understanding the matchup.
Final assessment of the matchup
The best way to interpret the 49ers vs cleveland browns match player stats is to separate volume from efficiency.
Cleveland’s rushing attack was productive.
Quinshon Judkins delivered 91 rushing yards.
The Browns finished with 138 rushing yards.
Shedeur Sanders completed 16 passes and threw no interceptions.
The defense recorded seven quarterback hits.
Those are legitimate positives.
But San Francisco performed better in the categories that most directly affected the scoreboard.
The 49ers:
- Converted 64.7 percent of third downs
- Lost zero fumbles
- Scored three touchdowns
- Converted both field-goal attempts
- Scored in all four quarters
- Recorded three sacks
- Returned punts for 69 yards
- Converted three of five red-zone trips into touchdowns
Cleveland:
- Converted 27.3 percent of third downs
- Went 0-for-4 on fourth down
- Lost two fumbles
- Scored one touchdown
- Failed to score after halftime
- Produced only three punt-return yards
That contrast explains the final result far better than total yardage.
FAQs
Who led the 49ers in rushing against the Browns?
Christian McCaffrey led San Francisco with 20 carries for 53 yards and one rushing touchdown.
Who led the Browns in rushing?
Quinshon Judkins led Cleveland with 23 carries for 91 yards. He averaged 4.0 yards per carry.
How many passing yards did Brock Purdy have?
Purdy completed 16 of 29 passes for 168 yards, one touchdown, and no interceptions.
Who was San Francisco’s leading receiver?
George Kittle led the 49ers with four receptions for 67 yards. His longest catch went for 33 yards.
Who scored Cleveland’s touchdown?
Harold Fannin Jr. caught three passes for 43 yards and one touchdown, which was Cleveland’s only touchdown.
What was the final score?
San Francisco defeated Cleveland 26-8 on November 30, 2025, at Huntington Bank Field. The official NFL game center records the same final score and quarter-by-quarter result.
Conclusion
The 49ers vs cleveland browns match player stats show why football games cannot be judged by yardage totals alone.
Cleveland actually finished with 253 total yards compared with San Francisco’s 252. The Browns also ran for 138 yards, 47 more than the 49ers. Quinshon Judkins had an excellent individual rushing performance, while Harold Fannin Jr. produced Cleveland’s only touchdown.
San Francisco won because it was more effective in the moments that mattered most.
Brock Purdy protected the football and produced 168 passing yards and a touchdown. Christian McCaffrey scored on the ground. Jauan Jennings caught a touchdown. George Kittle provided the team’s biggest receiving production. Matt Gay converted both field-goal attempts.
At the team level, the decisive statistics were third-down conversion, red-zone execution, turnover protection, and scoring consistency.
San Francisco converted 11 of 17 third downs, while Cleveland converted only three of 11. The 49ers lost no fumbles, while Cleveland lost two. San Francisco scored in every quarter, while Cleveland was shut out in the first, third, and fourth quarters.
That combination explains how a game with almost identical total yardage ended 26-8.
For anyone studying NFL box scores, this matchup is a useful reminder that the most meaningful player statistics are not always the biggest numbers. Workload, efficiency, scoring opportunities, turnovers, and situational execution often provide the clearest explanation of what actually happened on the field.
