76ers vs Cleveland Cavaliers Match Player Stats
The 76ers vs cleveland cavaliers match player stats from January 16, 2026 tell the story of a game that looked like Philadelphia’s to control for most of the night, only for Cleveland to produce the decisive plays in the final minutes. The Cavaliers defeated the 76ers 117-115 at Xfinity Mobile Arena in Philadelphia, overcoming an 11-point fourth-quarter deficit. Jaylon Tyson delivered a career-high 39 points, while Evan Mobley scored the winning basket with 4.8 seconds remaining.
The final score does not fully explain why Cleveland won. Philadelphia actually led 100-89 during the fourth quarter and appeared to have the game under control. Cleveland then produced a 13-2 run, recovered from another seven-point deficit, and turned a two-point game into a memorable road victory. The final possession was especially important: Tyson drove along the baseline, drew Joel Embiid and Paul George toward him, then found Mobley for the winning dunk.
For readers looking beyond the headline score, this game offers several useful statistical lessons. Cleveland shot 51.8% from the field and 50% from three-point range, while Philadelphia shot 47.3% overall and 37.5% from deep. Philadelphia had fewer turnovers, more steals, and more fast-break points, but Cleveland’s superior shooting and half-court efficiency ultimately made the difference.
76ers vs cleveland cavaliers match player stats: Game Overview
The matchup took place on Friday, January 16, 2026, with the official game information listing the venue as Xfinity Mobile Arena in Philadelphia. The announced attendance was 19,746, recorded as a sellout in the official NBA scorer’s report. Cleveland entered the contest at 24-19 overall and 10-9 on the road, while Philadelphia was 22-18 overall and 10-11 at home.
| Category | Cavaliers | 76ers |
| Final Score | 117 | 115 |
| Q1 | 31 | 31 |
| Q2 | 24 | 31 |
| Q3 | 29 | 29 |
| Q4 | 33 | 24 |
| Field Goals | 44-85 | 43-91 |
| FG Percentage | 51.8% | 47.3% |
| 3-Pointers | 17-34 | 12-32 |
| 3PT Percentage | 50.0% | 37.5% |
| Free Throws | 12-17 | 17-19 |
| FT Percentage | 70.6% | 89.5% |
| Rebounds | 42 | 37 |
| Assists | 38 | 28 |
| Steals | 7 | 11 |
| Blocks | 5 | 8 |
| Turnovers | 18 | 10 |
| Points in Paint | 48 | 38 |
| Fast-Break Points | 14 | 23 |
| Second-Chance Points | 16 | 13 |
The official NBA box score confirms that Cleveland won despite committing eight more turnovers. That is an important part of the game’s statistical profile because Philadelphia generated 23 fast-break points compared with Cleveland’s 14, yet the Cavaliers still finished with a two-point victory.
The biggest statistical separator was shooting efficiency. Cleveland made 44 of 85 attempts, while Philadelphia made 43 of 91. That means the Cavaliers needed six fewer field-goal attempts to make one more basket than the 76ers. Cleveland also converted 17 three-pointers compared with Philadelphia’s 12.
That combination created a major efficiency advantage.
Quarter-by-Quarter Breakdown
First Quarter: Even From the Start
The opening quarter ended 31-31, setting the tone for a competitive game. Cleveland shot extremely well early, making 12 of 19 field-goal attempts in the period. Philadelphia countered by generating seven assists and attacking quickly in transition.
Joel Embiid immediately established himself as Philadelphia’s primary scoring threat. He scored 13 points in the opening period alone, including four made free throws.
Jaylon Tyson also made an early impact for Cleveland, scoring 12 first-quarter points. His scoring efficiency was a preview of what would eventually become the defining individual performance of the game.
Second Quarter: Philadelphia Takes Control
The second quarter belonged to Philadelphia. The 76ers outscored Cleveland 31-24 and entered halftime with a 62-55 lead.
Philadelphia’s advantage was not based only on shooting. The team also pushed the pace and created fast-break opportunities. Cleveland committed eight turnovers in the opening quarter and had 12 turnovers by halftime, giving Philadelphia additional possessions.
Embiid finished the first half with 19 points, while Paul George had 10. Tyrese Maxey contributed nine points and five assists before halftime.
For Cleveland, Tyson had 19 points at the break. However, the Cavaliers were still seven points behind despite his scoring because Philadelphia was doing a better job converting Cleveland’s mistakes into offense.
Third Quarter: Cleveland Stabilizes
The third quarter ended 29-29, meaning Philadelphia retained its seven-point advantage entering the final period.
This was a crucial stretch because Cleveland did not allow the game to get away. Tyson continued to attack efficiently, scoring 12 points in the third quarter. Nae’Qwan Tomlin also contributed nine points in the period.
The Cavaliers entered the fourth quarter trailing 91-84.
At that point, the game was still leaning toward Philadelphia, but Cleveland’s offensive efficiency gave it a path back.
Fourth Quarter: The Comeback
The fourth quarter decided everything.
Philadelphia eventually extended its advantage to 11 points. Paul George hit a jumper with 8:47 remaining to give the 76ers a commanding 100-89 lead. Cleveland then responded with a 13-2 run that tied the game at 102. De’Andre Hunter completed the comeback sequence with a three-pointer with 5:53 remaining.
Philadelphia briefly rebuilt a seven-point lead, but Cleveland stayed within striking distance.
Hunter then gave Cleveland a one-point advantage with a layup with just over a minute left. Evan Mobley made one of two free throws with 22.7 seconds remaining, putting Cleveland ahead 115-113.
Maxey responded with a runner with 8.1 seconds remaining to tie the game at 115.
That set up the final possession.
Tyson received the inbound pass from Lonzo Ball, drove baseline, attracted Philadelphia’s defenders and passed to Mobley. Mobley finished the play with a dunk with 4.8 seconds left. Maxey’s long attempt at the buzzer missed, allowing Cleveland to escape with the 117-115 victory.
Jaylon Tyson’s Career-High Performance
The most remarkable individual number from the game was Jaylon Tyson’s 39 points.
Tyson played 38:10 and shot 13-of-17 from the field, 7-of-9 from three-point range and 6-of-6 from the free-throw line. He also recorded five rebounds and four assists.
His 76.5% field-goal percentage is impressive by itself. The more important detail is that his outside shooting was just as efficient. He made seven of nine three-point attempts, good for 77.8%.
That made his scoring difficult for Philadelphia to contain.
Tyson did not simply accumulate points through volume. He produced 39 points on only 17 field-goal attempts. His scoring efficiency was therefore one of the clearest reasons Cleveland could survive its turnover problem.
His fourth-quarter performance was especially important. He made a three-pointer with under two minutes remaining to put Cleveland ahead by one, then created the winning basket by drawing defenders on the final possession and finding Mobley.
The official NBA report also confirms that Tyson’s 39 points were a career high.
Donovan Mitchell’s Playmaking Impact
Donovan Mitchell did not have a typical high-scoring Mitchell game. He finished with 13 points on 4-of-13 shooting, including 4-of-7 from three-point range.
However, focusing only on his scoring would miss his biggest contribution.
Mitchell produced 12 assists and nine rebounds. He also recorded one steal.
The 12 assists were particularly important because Cleveland was without Darius Garland, who was unavailable because of right big-toe soreness. Sam Merrill was also inactive with a right-hand sprain.
With Garland unavailable, Mitchell had to carry more of the primary ball-handling responsibility. His 12 assists helped Cleveland generate 38 team assists, 10 more than Philadelphia.
That is one of the most revealing numbers in the box score.
Cleveland’s offense was not dependent on one scorer creating everything alone. Tyson supplied the explosive scoring, while Mitchell organized possessions and created opportunities for teammates.
Evan Mobley Delivers the Game-Winner
Evan Mobley finished with 15 points, five rebounds, four assists, one steal and four blocks.
He shot 6-of-11 from the field and made one of four attempts from three-point range.
His overall offensive numbers were not spectacular compared with Tyson’s, but his defensive presence and final possession made him one of the most important players in the game.
The winning basket was a direct example of Mobley’s value around the rim. Tyson created the advantage, and Mobley finished it.
The four blocks also mattered because Philadelphia had a strong interior scoring option in Embiid. Mobley’s defensive workload was therefore significant even though his offensive production was secondary to Tyson’s.
One caution is important when interpreting his minus-12 plus/minus. Plus/minus is a lineup-context statistic, not a complete individual evaluation. Mobley can have a negative plus/minus while still making critical defensive plays and scoring the game-winning basket.
De’Andre Hunter Provides the Supporting Punch
De’Andre Hunter was Cleveland’s leading bench scorer with 16 points.
He played 30:46 and shot 7-of-13 from the field and 2-of-5 from three-point range. He also recorded three rebounds, four assists, one steal and one block.
His fourth-quarter contribution was especially valuable.
Hunter’s three-pointer during Cleveland’s 13-2 comeback run tied the game at 102. Later, his layup gave Cleveland a one-point lead with just over a minute remaining.
This is why raw scoring totals do not always identify the most important supporting player. Hunter’s 16 points came at several high-leverage moments.
Philadelphia 76ers Player Statistics
Philadelphia had four players reach double figures, led by Joel Embiid’s 33 points.
Joel Embiid
Embiid finished with 33 points, five rebounds, three assists and one block.
He shot 10-of-22 from the field, 2-of-3 from three-point range and 11-of-12 from the free-throw line.
The free-throw efficiency was outstanding. Embiid converted 91.7% of his attempts from the line and generated much of Philadelphia’s first-half scoring.
He had 19 points by halftime and was clearly the 76ers’ primary offensive weapon.
The problem for Philadelphia was not Embiid’s individual production. It was that the team’s overall offensive efficiency declined late, while Cleveland found a way to generate efficient possessions around Tyson and Mobley.
Tyrese Maxey
Maxey recorded 22 points, five rebounds, nine assists and five steals.
He shot 9-of-23 from the field, 2-of-8 from three and 2-of-2 from the free-throw line.
His nine assists tied him for Philadelphia’s team lead in playmaking value, while his five steals were a major defensive contribution.
Maxey also scored the game-tying basket with 8.1 seconds remaining. His runner made it 115-115 and appeared to put Philadelphia in position to win or force overtime.
The final half-court attempt simply did not fall.
Paul George
Paul George finished with 14 points, four rebounds and five assists.
He shot 6-of-12 from the field and 2-of-6 from three.
George was particularly productive early. He had 10 points by halftime and was part of the group that helped Philadelphia build its second-quarter advantage.
His fourth-quarter jumper with 8:47 remaining extended Philadelphia’s lead to 100-89. That was one of the game’s biggest lead-building moments.
VJ Edgecombe
VJ Edgecombe produced 10 points, four rebounds, four assists and one block.
His shooting efficiency was excellent. He made 4-of-5 field-goal attempts and both of his three-point attempts.
Although his overall scoring total was modest, his 80% field-goal shooting was one of Philadelphia’s more efficient individual performances.
Quentin Grimes
Quentin Grimes led the Philadelphia bench with 14 points.
He shot 5-of-12 from the field, 2-of-7 from three and 2-of-3 at the free-throw line. He also grabbed seven rebounds and added four assists.
His seven rebounds were tied for the Philadelphia team high with the official individual box score showing Grimes as one of the team’s strongest contributors outside the starting group.
Kelly Oubre Jr.
Oubre finished with 12 points, two rebounds and one assist.
He shot 4-of-7 from the field and 2-of-5 from three while making both of his free throws.
His 12 points gave Philadelphia another perimeter scoring option, but the 76ers could not maintain their fourth-quarter advantage.
Other Philadelphia Contributors
Adem Bona scored four points with four rebounds and three blocks in 14:53.
Trendon Watford scored four points, grabbed two rebounds and supplied two assists in 10:12.
Dominick Barlow finished with two points, two rebounds, three steals and one block.
Jabari Walker played 3:38 without scoring.
Andre Drummond, Justin Edwards, Eric Gordon, Kyle Lowry and Jared McCain did not play because of the coaching decision listed in the official report.
Cleveland’s Complete Statistical Picture
Cleveland’s starting group combined Tyson’s scoring, Mitchell’s passing and Mobley’s defensive work.
The starters were Jaylon Tyson, Evan Mobley, Jarrett Allen, Donovan Mitchell and Craig Porter Jr.
Tyson led the group with 39 points.
Mobley added 15 points and four blocks.
Mitchell produced 13 points, nine rebounds and 12 assists.
Allen contributed 10 points and seven rebounds.
Porter Jr. scored only two points but supplied 11 assists.
That last number is easy to overlook.
Craig Porter Jr. attempted only five shots, but he finished with 11 assists. His role was clearly focused on facilitating the offense rather than scoring.
The bench then supplied 16 points from Hunter, 13 from Tyrese Proctor and nine from Nae’Qwan Tomlin.
Proctor was particularly efficient, making five of eight field-goal attempts and three of five from three-point range.
Philadelphia’s Complete Statistical Picture
Philadelphia’s starters were Paul George, Dominick Barlow, Joel Embiid, Tyrese Maxey and VJ Edgecombe.
Embiid led all Philadelphia players with 33 points.
Maxey followed with 22 points and nine assists.
George added 14 points.
Edgecombe scored 10.
Barlow scored two.
The bench then contributed 14 points from Grimes, 12 from Oubre and smaller totals from Bona and Watford.
This distribution shows that Philadelphia received meaningful scoring from several players. The loss was therefore not simply the result of one player failing to perform.
Instead, Cleveland’s comeback was driven by late-game execution and shooting efficiency.
The Shooting Battle Explains the Result
One of the most useful ways to interpret this game is through shot efficiency.
Cleveland:
- 44-of-85 from the field
- 51.8% field-goal shooting
- 17-of-34 from three
- 50.0% three-point shooting
- 12-of-17 free throws
- 70.6% free-throw shooting
Philadelphia:
- 43-of-91 from the field
- 47.3% field-goal shooting
- 12-of-32 from three
- 37.5% three-point shooting
- 17-of-19 free throws
- 89.5% free-throw shooting
The 76ers were clearly better at the free-throw line.
But free throws were not enough to overcome Cleveland’s advantage from the field and beyond the arc.
Cleveland made five more three-pointers.
That is 15 additional points from made threes alone.
The Cavaliers also made one more field goal despite taking six fewer attempts.
This is the clearest statistical explanation for the final result.
Turnovers Tell a Different Story
Philadelphia won the turnover battle decisively.
Cleveland committed 18 turnovers.
Philadelphia committed only 10.
That eight-turnover difference would normally be a major advantage.
Philadelphia also turned those opportunities into a faster style of offense, finishing with 23 fast-break points compared with Cleveland’s 14.
Yet Cleveland still won.
Why?
Because the Cavaliers were more efficient when they had the ball.
Cleveland’s 51.8% field-goal percentage and 50% three-point shooting compensated for the extra possessions Philadelphia gained from turnovers.
This creates an important lesson for anyone analyzing basketball box scores: possession volume and shooting efficiency can point in different directions.
Philadelphia had the cleaner possession profile.
Cleveland had the more efficient scoring profile.
On this night, efficiency won.
Rebounding and Interior Play
Cleveland finished with 42 rebounds compared with Philadelphia’s 37.
The Cavaliers also had 48 points in the paint against Philadelphia’s 38.
That combination indicates that Cleveland generated significant interior production despite Philadelphia having Embiid.
Jarrett Allen grabbed seven rebounds.
Tyson and Mobley each had five.
Mitchell had nine, which was a major contribution from the guard position.
Philadelphia’s top rebound totals were five from Embiid, five from Maxey and seven from Grimes.
The 76ers did have 13 second-chance points, compared with Cleveland’s 16, so the rebounding gap was not enormous.
Still, Cleveland’s ability to score inside while also shooting 50% from three gave Philadelphia a difficult defensive balance to maintain.
Assists Reveal Cleveland’s Offensive Structure
Cleveland finished with 38 assists.
Philadelphia finished with 28.
That 10-assist advantage is significant.
Mitchell had 12.
Porter Jr. had 11.
Tyson and Mobley each had four.
Philadelphia was led by Maxey with nine and George with five.
Cleveland therefore had two players individually reaching double figures in assists.
This is an important indicator of how the Cavaliers generated efficient offense.
Tyson did not need to create every shot himself. Mitchell and Porter Jr. helped distribute the ball, while Tyson finished possessions at an extraordinary rate.
That combination made Cleveland’s offense unusually difficult to disrupt despite the team’s turnover total.
The Biggest Tactical Turning Point
The decisive tactical shift occurred in the fourth quarter.
Philadelphia’s 100-89 lead gave the 76ers control of the game.
Cleveland responded with a 13-2 run.
The comeback was not simply one hot shooting sequence. Hunter’s three-pointer tied the game at 102, and Cleveland continued competing after Philadelphia restored a seven-point advantage.
The Cavaliers repeatedly created opportunities for Tyson and Hunter while relying on Mitchell to organize possessions.
The final sequence then demonstrated why decision-making matters as much as shooting.
With the game tied at 115, Cleveland did not force Tyson into a difficult contested shot. Tyson drove, drew two defenders and passed.
Mobley finished.
The winning possession therefore involved three separate skills:
- Tyson’s ability to attack the baseline.
- His recognition that the defense had collapsed.
- Mobley’s positioning and finishing ability.
The final basket was a team play, even though Tyson received much of the attention for his 39-point performance.
Why Philadelphia Lost Despite Strong Numbers
Philadelphia actually had several statistical advantages.
The 76ers:
- Committed eight fewer turnovers.
- Recorded four more steals.
- Recorded three more blocks.
- Scored nine more fast-break points.
- Made five more free throws.
- Shot 89.5% from the line.
- Led by 11 in the fourth quarter.
Those numbers make the defeat more difficult to understand at first glance.
The answer is Cleveland’s shot-making.
The Cavaliers made 17 threes at a 50% rate. Philadelphia made 12 at 37.5%.
That five-three gap translated into a 15-point difference.
Cleveland also finished with 48 points in the paint compared with Philadelphia’s 38.
So Philadelphia had advantages in pressure and transition, while Cleveland had advantages in efficient half-court scoring.
When the game slowed down in the final minutes, Cleveland’s ability to produce efficient possessions became decisive.
What the Player Stats Say About Each Team
The individual numbers reveal two very different offensive models.
Philadelphia relied heavily on its established stars.
Embiid scored 33.
Maxey scored 22 and added nine assists.
George scored 14.
That trio accounted for 69 points.
Cleveland had a more distributed creation model.
Tyson scored 39.
Mitchell produced 13 points and 12 assists.
Mobley added 15.
Hunter contributed 16.
Porter Jr. supplied 11 assists.
The Cavaliers therefore had multiple players contributing to the creation process even though Tyson was clearly the primary scorer.
This distinction matters when evaluating close games.
A team can depend on one dominant scorer while still using several players to create the shots that scorer receives.
That is essentially what happened with Cleveland.
What the Game Means for Individual Player Evaluation
Box scores are most useful when they are interpreted rather than simply repeated.
Tyson’s 39 points deserve enormous attention, but the shooting efficiency makes the performance even more impressive.
Mitchell’s 13 points look ordinary until his 12 assists and nine rebounds are included.
Porter Jr.’s two points look insignificant until his 11 assists are considered.
Mobley’s 15 points do not tell the full story because he also recorded four blocks and scored the winning basket.
Hunter’s 16 points become more valuable when his fourth-quarter contributions are considered.
On Philadelphia’s side, Embiid’s 33 points demonstrate that he produced offensively, while Maxey’s five steals show that he was active defensively despite the loss.
Grimes’ 14 points and seven rebounds also gave the 76ers useful bench production.
This is why a good player-stat analysis should examine points, shooting, playmaking, rebounding, defense and game context together.
A Closer Look at Efficiency
Tyson’s shooting line deserves special attention.
He scored 39 points on 13-of-17 shooting, which means he made 76.5% of his field-goal attempts.
He also made seven of nine threes.
The official statistical record gives him an effective field-goal percentage of approximately 97.1%, reflecting the extra value of his made three-pointers. Basketball-Reference’s advanced box score records a 99.3% true-shooting percentage for Tyson in the game.
That level of efficiency is extraordinary for a player carrying a 39-point scoring load.
Philadelphia’s defensive problem was therefore not simply that Tyson scored frequently. It was that he scored without needing excessive shot volume.
The Role of Missing Players
The game also needs to be viewed through the availability context.
Cleveland was without Darius Garland and Sam Merrill, while several other Cavaliers were inactive. The official scorer’s report lists Garland, Merrill, Max Strus and Dean Wade among Cleveland’s inactive players.
Garland’s absence was particularly important because it shifted additional ball-handling responsibilities toward Mitchell and Porter Jr.
Rather than allowing the offense to become stagnant, Cleveland finished with 38 assists.
That makes the victory more impressive from a playmaking standpoint.
Philadelphia also had players unavailable, but the official report shows that several players who were on the roster did not enter the game because of coaching decisions.
Historical Context of the Matchup
The result was Cleveland’s second victory over Philadelphia during the two-game stop in Philadelphia that week. The Cavaliers had already defeated the 76ers 133-107 on Wednesday before returning for the 117-115 victory on Friday. The win also gave Cleveland its third straight victory of the 2026 calendar year and its sixth win in its last seven meetings with Philadelphia, according to the Cavaliers’ official recap.
That context matters because this was not an isolated competitive result.
Cleveland had demonstrated an ability to trouble Philadelphia in the same building only two days earlier.
The second game was much closer, but the late-game pattern again favored Cleveland.
A Practical Way to Read These Player Stats
For readers researching this matchup for analysis, fantasy basketball, historical comparison or general NBA study, the best approach is to divide the numbers into five categories.
1. Scoring
Start with points, but immediately compare them with field-goal attempts.
Tyson’s 39 points on 17 field-goal attempts tell a much different story from a player scoring 39 on 30 attempts.
2. Shooting
Look separately at overall shooting and three-point shooting.
Cleveland’s 50% three-point rate was one of the biggest reasons the Cavaliers survived their turnover disadvantage.
3. Creation
Assists show how a team generated offense.
Mitchell and Porter Jr. combined for 23 assists, which explains a large part of Cleveland’s 38 total assists.
4. Possessions
Turnovers and offensive rebounds provide clues about possession volume.
Philadelphia was better here because Cleveland committed 18 turnovers.
5. Game Context
Finally, ask when the production occurred.
Hunter’s fourth-quarter three, Maxey’s late runner and Tyson’s final possession were more important to the outcome than many earlier baskets.
That context separates meaningful analysis from a basic box-score transcription.
Key Takeaways From the Match
The most important lessons from the game can be summarized clearly.
Jaylon Tyson was the headline performer. His 39 points were a career high, and he shot 13-of-17 from the field and 7-of-9 from three.
Evan Mobley made the decisive play. His four blocks and game-winning dunk made him critical beyond his 15 points.
Donovan Mitchell was Cleveland’s primary creator. His 12 assists and nine rebounds offset a relatively inefficient 4-of-13 shooting night.
Philadelphia’s stars produced. Embiid scored 33, Maxey scored 22 and George scored 14.
The three-point gap mattered. Cleveland made 17 threes compared with Philadelphia’s 12.
Turnovers did not tell the whole story. Philadelphia committed only 10 turnovers against Cleveland’s 18, yet still lost.
Fourth-quarter execution decided the result. Cleveland erased an 11-point deficit and scored 33 points in the final period while Philadelphia managed 24.
FAQs
Who scored the most points in the Cavaliers vs 76ers game?
Jaylon Tyson led all scorers with 39 points for Cleveland. He shot 13-of-17 from the field, 7-of-9 from three-point range and 6-of-6 from the free-throw line.
What was the final score between the Cavaliers and 76ers?
The Cleveland Cavaliers defeated the Philadelphia 76ers 117-115 on January 16, 2026, at Xfinity Mobile Arena in Philadelphia.
How many points did Joel Embiid score?
Joel Embiid scored 33 points for Philadelphia. He also recorded five rebounds, three assists and one block while shooting 10-of-22 from the field.
How many assists did Donovan Mitchell have?
Donovan Mitchell recorded 12 assists along with 13 points and nine rebounds. His 12 assists were the most by any player in the game.
Who hit the game-winning basket?
Evan Mobley scored the game-winning dunk with 4.8 seconds remaining. Jaylon Tyson created the opportunity by driving baseline and passing to Mobley after the defense collapsed.
Which team shot better from three-point range?
Cleveland shot 50% from three-point range, making 17 of 34 attempts. Philadelphia shot 37.5%, making 12 of 32.
Conclusion
The 76ers vs cleveland cavaliers match player stats show why a two-point NBA game should never be judged from the final score alone.
Philadelphia had the advantage in several traditional possession categories. The 76ers committed only 10 turnovers, forced 18 from Cleveland, collected 11 steals and produced 23 fast-break points. They also led by 11 points during the fourth quarter.
Yet Cleveland controlled the more important efficiency battle.
The Cavaliers shot 51.8% from the field and 50% from three-point range. They made 17 three-pointers, finished with 38 assists and scored 48 points in the paint. Tyson’s 39-point performance provided elite scoring efficiency, Mitchell’s 12 assists kept the offense organized, Hunter delivered important fourth-quarter baskets, and Mobley completed the comeback with the final dunk.
Philadelphia received outstanding production from Embiid, who scored 33 points, and Maxey, who added 22 points, nine assists and five steals. The 76ers did enough to build a substantial lead, but they could not protect it when Cleveland increased its pressure and shot-making late.
Ultimately, the statistical story is simple but meaningful: Philadelphia generated more pressure possessions, while Cleveland made more of its scoring opportunities. In a game decided by two points, that difference in efficiency was enough to determine the winner.
