Memphis Grizzlies vs Timberwolves Match Player Stats
The memphis grizzlies vs timberwolves match player stats from the March 4, 2026 matchup tell a much more detailed story than the final score alone. Minnesota defeated Memphis 117-110 at Target Center, but the game was competitive for long stretches. Memphis led by 11 points during the contest and entered halftime ahead 62-57 before Minnesota changed the game with stronger rebounding, improved defensive pressure, and a dominant fourth-quarter performance from Anthony Edwards.
For readers checking individual performances, Edwards was the clear headline. He finished with 41 points, six rebounds, two assists, five steals, and one block while shooting 15-of-29 from the field and 7-of-13 from three-point range. Julius Randle added 23 points and 11 rebounds, while Jaden McDaniels contributed 16 points on 6-of-8 shooting. On Memphis’s side, Jaylen Wells led the team with 19 points, while Cedric Coward scored 15 and GG Jackson produced a useful 12-point, 11-rebound double-double.
The numbers also reveal why Minnesota won despite shooting only 29% from three. The Timberwolves controlled the glass 52-33, generated 13 offensive rebounds, and scored 50 points in the paint. Memphis shot better from three at 39%, but its 17 turnovers and large rebounding deficit created too many extra opportunities for Minnesota.
Memphis Grizzlies vs Timberwolves Match Player Stats: Game Overview
The matchup ended with Minnesota winning 117-110. The official NBA game record lists Target Center in Minneapolis as the venue and records an attendance of 17,416. The game was officiated by Kevin Cutler, Matt Myers, and Tyler Ford.
The quarter-by-quarter scoring explains how the game changed:
| Quarter | Memphis | Minnesota |
| 1st | 32 | 23 |
| 2nd | 30 | 34 |
| 3rd | 20 | 32 |
| 4th | 28 | 28 |
| Final | 110 | 117 |
Memphis started exceptionally well. The Grizzlies scored 32 points in the opening quarter and added another 30 in the second. Their 62-point first half gave them a five-point advantage at the break.
Minnesota’s response came after halftime. The Timberwolves outscored Memphis 32-20 in the third quarter, turning a five-point deficit into a seven-point lead. The fourth quarter finished level at 28-28, meaning the decisive work had already been done during the third period.
This is important when evaluating player performances. A box score can show who scored the most points, but the quarter splits show when the game actually moved toward Minnesota.
Team shooting comparison
Memphis finished 36-of-79 from the field, good for 46%. The Grizzlies also made 15 of 38 three-point attempts, or 39%, and converted 23 of 29 free throws for 79%.
Minnesota shot 40-of-84 overall, or 48%. The Timberwolves made only 10 of 34 three-point attempts, a 29% rate, but matched Memphis at 79% from the free-throw line by making 27 of 34 attempts.
The interesting point is that Minnesota did not win because of superior three-point shooting. Memphis actually had the better perimeter percentage.
Minnesota won because its advantages came in other areas.
Rebounding was the defining statistical difference
The biggest team-level number is the rebounding margin.
Minnesota collected 52 rebounds compared with 33 for Memphis. That is a 19-rebound advantage.
The offensive rebounding difference was also substantial. Minnesota grabbed 13 offensive boards while Memphis collected only five. Those additional possessions matter because they can compensate for inefficient shooting.
Rudy Gobert played an important role here. He finished with 12 rebounds, including four offensive rebounds. Randle added 11 rebounds, while McDaniels contributed seven. Naz Reid had six and Donte DiVincenzo collected four.
Memphis did receive an excellent rebounding performance from GG Jackson, who grabbed 11 boards in only 22:39. However, one player could not offset Minnesota’s collective advantage on the glass.
Anthony Edwards Dominates the Scoring Battle
Anthony Edwards delivered the most influential individual performance of the game.
He scored 41 points in 37:16, shooting 15-of-29 from the field. His seven made three-pointers came on 13 attempts, and he was perfect from the free-throw line at 4-of-4.
His complete line was:
- 41 points
- 6 rebounds
- 2 assists
- 5 steals
- 1 block
- 15-of-29 field goals
- 7-of-13 three-pointers
- 4-of-4 free throws
- +13 plus/minus
The five steals are especially noteworthy because his influence was not limited to scoring. Edwards contributed directly to Minnesota’s defensive activity as well.
According to the game recap, Edwards scored 13 points in the fourth quarter, including three three-pointers, as Minnesota pulled away. That late scoring burst is one of the clearest reasons his 41-point performance translated into a victory rather than simply producing impressive individual numbers.
Why Edwards’ efficiency mattered
A 41-point game does not automatically mean a player was efficient. Edwards’ shooting profile makes this performance more meaningful.
He made 51.7% of his field-goal attempts and 53.8% of his three-point attempts. He also made every free throw he attempted.
More importantly, Edwards produced those numbers without excessive turnover damage. He committed two turnovers in 37:16.
His plus/minus of +13 also indicates that Minnesota outscored Memphis by 13 points during his minutes on the court. Plus/minus should never be treated as a complete measure of individual quality, because it depends heavily on teammates and lineups, but in this game it supports the broader picture of Edwards’ impact.
Julius Randle Provides the Secondary Production
Julius Randle was Minnesota’s second-leading scorer with 23 points.
He shot 7-of-15 from the field, went 0-of-4 from three, and made 9-of-12 free throws. He also grabbed 11 rebounds and supplied four assists.
His final statistical line was:
| Stat | Julius Randle |
| Points | 23 |
| Rebounds | 11 |
| Assists | 4 |
| FG | 7-15 |
| 3PT | 0-4 |
| FT | 9-12 |
| Turnovers | 5 |
| Plus/minus | +1 |
Randle’s performance was different from Edwards’. Edwards created a large portion of his value through perimeter shot-making and defensive plays, while Randle contributed more through scoring inside the offense, rebounding, and free throws.
His 11 rebounds were particularly important because Minnesota’s overall dominance on the glass was one of the decisive features of the game.
The five turnovers, however, are worth noting. Randle’s offensive contribution was valuable, but those possessions prevented his overall statistical line from being completely clean.
Jaden McDaniels Makes an Efficient Contribution
Jaden McDaniels scored 16 points while making 6 of 8 field-goal attempts.
That 75% field-goal rate stands out immediately.
He also grabbed seven rebounds, made all four of his free throws, recorded one steal, and committed only one turnover. His plus/minus was +5.
McDaniels did not need a high volume of shots to influence the game. His efficiency helped Minnesota maintain scoring pressure without requiring Edwards and Randle to carry every possession.
His 6-of-8 shooting also illustrates why looking only at scoring totals can be misleading. A 16-point performance on eight attempts can be more efficient than a higher-scoring performance that requires a much larger shot volume.
Rudy Gobert Controls the Interior
Rudy Gobert finished with only five points, but his offensive scoring should not be used to judge his overall impact.
He grabbed 12 rebounds, including four offensive rebounds, and finished 1-of-2 from the field and 3-of-6 at the free-throw line.
His five points might look modest, but Minnesota’s interior advantage was much more important than his scoring total.
Gobert’s rebounding helped Minnesota create second-chance opportunities while also limiting Memphis’s ability to secure defensive rebounds.
The Timberwolves eventually finished with 52 total rebounds, and Gobert’s 12 represented nearly one-quarter of that total.
Donte DiVincenzo’s Playmaking Matters
Donte DiVincenzo scored only seven points, but he led Minnesota with six assists.
He shot 3-of-7 from the field and 1-of-5 from three. His +21 plus/minus was the highest among Minnesota players who appeared in the box score.
That combination is a good reminder that scoring is only one part of a guard’s role.
DiVincenzo helped connect possessions, created opportunities for teammates, and contributed to Minnesota’s ball movement. His six assists were the most on either team.
The Timberwolves finished with 19 assists overall, while Memphis had 27. That means Memphis actually recorded more assists despite losing the game.
This is another useful example of why individual and team statistics must be interpreted together. Memphis moved the ball effectively, but Minnesota’s rebounding, shot-making from key players, and defensive activity outweighed that advantage.
Ayo Dosunmu Gives Minnesota a Strong Bench Boost
Ayo Dosunmu scored 14 points in 28:34.
He shot 5-of-9 from the field and made all four of his free throws. He also recorded three rebounds and four assists.
His efficiency was important because Minnesota needed reliable production outside its top two scorers.
Dosunmu’s 14 points came on only nine field-goal attempts, and his perfect free-throw shooting helped him convert efficiently when opportunities reached the line.
His performance also demonstrates the depth behind Edwards and Randle. Minnesota did not need Edwards to score all of its points because several supporting players provided efficient contributions.
Memphis Grizzlies Player Performances
Memphis lost the game, but several Grizzlies players produced useful individual numbers.
Jaylen Wells led the team with 19 points. Cedric Coward scored 15, Ty Jerome added 14, and GG Jackson finished with 12 points and 11 rebounds.
The distribution of Memphis scoring was relatively broad, but the team could not maintain its first-half advantage once Minnesota increased its defensive intensity.
Jaylen Wells leads Memphis
Jaylen Wells was Memphis’s top scorer with 19 points.
He shot 7-of-12 from the field and 4-of-7 from three-point range. His 58.3% field-goal percentage and 57.1% three-point percentage made him one of the most efficient offensive players on either team.
Wells also scored 15 points in the first half, helping Memphis enter halftime with a 62-57 lead.
His overall line was:
| Stat | Jaylen Wells |
| Points | 19 |
| Rebounds | 1 |
| Assists | 0 |
| FG | 7-12 |
| 3PT | 4-7 |
| FT | 1-2 |
| Steals | 1 |
| Turnovers | 1 |
| Plus/minus | -10 |
The key limitation was not his scoring efficiency. It was the lack of additional production in other areas.
Wells was outstanding as a scorer, but Minnesota’s physical advantage eventually became more important than Memphis’s perimeter efficiency.
GG Jackson records a double-double
GG Jackson finished with 12 points and 11 rebounds.
He was one of Memphis’s most efficient shooters, making 4 of 5 field-goal attempts, including his only three-point attempt.
His line included four offensive rebounds, seven defensive rebounds, one steal, and one block. He also committed four turnovers.
The 11 rebounds were especially valuable because Memphis needed additional possession control against a much larger Minnesota frontcourt.
Jackson’s performance was therefore stronger than his 12-point total suggests. He supplied interior activity, rebounding, and efficient shooting.
Cedric Coward adds 15 points
Cedric Coward scored 15 points in 24 minutes.
He made 4 of 8 field-goal attempts, 2 of 4 from three, and all five of his free throws.
He also added two rebounds, one assist, one steal, and one block.
Coward’s perfect 5-of-5 free-throw shooting helped maintain Memphis’s offensive efficiency. He also provided two-way activity with a steal and a block.
Ty Jerome contributes 14 points
Ty Jerome scored 14 points while shooting 4-of-13 from the field and 2-of-6 from three.
He made all four free throws and added four rebounds, two assists, and one steal.
The shooting percentage was less efficient than Wells or Coward, but Jerome still supplied secondary scoring when Memphis needed another creator.
Scotty Pippen Jr. creates opportunities
Scotty Pippen Jr. scored eight points and led Memphis with five assists.
He shot 3-of-7 overall and 1-of-4 from three. He also recorded three rebounds, one steal, and four turnovers.
His five assists were important because Memphis finished with 27 team assists, eight more than Minnesota.
However, the four turnovers also show the tension between creation and ball security. Pippen Jr. was asked to make plays, but some of those possessions ultimately became opportunities for Minnesota.
Walter Clayton Jr. shows a strong passing game
Walter Clayton Jr. finished with nine points and nine assists.
That was arguably one of the more interesting supporting performances on the Memphis roster because he created significantly more offense for teammates than his scoring total suggests.
He shot 2-of-6 from the field, made 1 of 3 three-pointers, and converted all four free throws.
His nine assists were the highest individual assist total in the game.
He also recorded two steals.
Full Memphis Player Statistics
The complete Memphis statistical picture shows how evenly distributed the scoring was:
| Player | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3PT | FT |
| Jaylen Wells | 19 | 1 | 0 | 7-12 | 4-7 | 1-2 |
| Cedric Coward | 15 | 2 | 1 | 4-8 | 2-4 | 5-5 |
| Ty Jerome | 14 | 4 | 2 | 4-13 | 2-6 | 4-4 |
| GG Jackson | 12 | 11 | 0 | 4-5 | 1-1 | 3-4 |
| Cam Spencer | 10 | 2 | 4 | 3-6 | 1-2 | 3-4 |
| Walter Clayton Jr. | 9 | 1 | 9 | 2-6 | 1-3 | 4-4 |
| Scotty Pippen Jr. | 8 | 3 | 5 | 3-7 | 1-4 | 1-2 |
| Taylor Hendricks | 8 | 1 | 2 | 3-9 | 1-4 | 1-2 |
| Rayan Rupert | 13 | 6 | 1 | 5-9 | 2-4 | 1-2 |
| Olivier-Maxence Prosper | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1-4 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
Memphis also had Brandon Clarke and Santi Aldama listed as not playing in the ESPN box score because of their respective status notes.
Full Minnesota Player Statistics
Minnesota’s principal contributors were:
| Player | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3PT | FT |
| Anthony Edwards | 41 | 6 | 2 | 15-29 | 7-13 | 4-4 |
| Julius Randle | 23 | 11 | 4 | 7-15 | 0-4 | 9-12 |
| Jaden McDaniels | 16 | 7 | 1 | 6-8 | 0-1 | 4-4 |
| Ayo Dosunmu | 14 | 3 | 4 | 5-9 | 0-1 | 4-4 |
| Donte DiVincenzo | 7 | 4 | 6 | 3-7 | 1-5 | 0-0 |
| Bones Hyland | 6 | 2 | 0 | 2-6 | 2-6 | 0-0 |
| Rudy Gobert | 5 | 12 | 1 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 3-6 |
| Naz Reid | 3 | 6 | 1 | 1-8 | 0-4 | 1-2 |
| Kyle Anderson | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 2-2 |
The official box score confirms the player-by-player totals, shooting numbers, rebounds, assists, turnovers, steals, blocks, and plus/minus figures.
The Three Numbers That Explain the Result
If someone wants to understand the game quickly, three numbers deserve particular attention.
1. 52-33 rebounding advantage
Minnesota won the rebounding battle by 19.
That is an enormous possession advantage in a game decided by only seven points.
The Timberwolves also collected 13 offensive rebounds compared with five for Memphis. Those extra chances helped Minnesota survive a poor three-point shooting night.
2. 17 Memphis turnovers
Memphis committed 17 turnovers compared with 16 for Minnesota.
The difference is only one turnover, so the raw turnover margin does not completely explain the result. However, Memphis’s turnovers came alongside the major rebounding deficit, which made its possession disadvantage more meaningful.
3. 41 points from Edwards
Edwards produced 41 points, including 13 in the fourth quarter.
When a game is close late, having a primary scorer capable of creating high-value shots can change the outcome quickly. Edwards supplied that late-game scoring burst.
How Minnesota Changed the Game After Halftime
The halftime score was 62-57 in Memphis’s favor.
Minnesota then outscored Memphis 32-20 in the third quarter.
That 12-point swing effectively changed the game.
The Timberwolves increased their defensive pressure and began controlling the interior. The official game recap notes that Minnesota drew even at 72-all in the third quarter before Edwards converted a layup to put the Timberwolves ahead 74-72. Minnesota did not trail again.
This sequence is more informative than simply saying Minnesota had a better second half.
The Grizzlies had already demonstrated that their offense could work against Minnesota. The problem was maintaining that level after the Timberwolves adjusted.
Minnesota’s ability to combine stronger defense with rebounding created a different game after halftime.
Why Memphis Lost Despite Better Three-Point Shooting
At first glance, Memphis appears to have had an obvious shooting advantage.
The Grizzlies shot 39% from three.
Minnesota shot only 29%.
Yet Minnesota won by seven.
This is exactly why a single shooting statistic should not be used to explain a basketball game.
Minnesota made 40 field goals compared with Memphis’s 36. The Timberwolves also had eight more free throws made, 27 compared with 23.
Most importantly, Minnesota generated more opportunities through rebounding.
The Timberwolves had 52 total rebounds and 13 offensive rebounds. Memphis had 33 total rebounds and five offensive rebounds.
That possession advantage helped Minnesota compensate for its weak perimeter shooting.
The Timberwolves also scored 50 points in the paint compared with 36 for Memphis.
The practical lesson is straightforward: perimeter accuracy matters, but shot volume, second chances, free throws, and interior scoring can overwhelm a three-point percentage advantage.
The Importance of Plus/Minus in This Game
Plus/minus measures the team’s net point differential while a player is on the court.
It is useful as supporting evidence, but it should not be treated as a standalone ranking of player quality.
The game provides several interesting examples.
Donte DiVincenzo recorded a +21, the best figure among Minnesota players listed in the box score. Edwards was +13, while McDaniels was +5 and Gobert was +4.
On Memphis, several players finished with negative plus/minus figures despite productive individual statistics.
Jaylen Wells scored 19 points but finished -10.
Ty Jerome scored 14 but was -16.
Scotty Pippen Jr. scored eight points and recorded five assists but was also -16.
These numbers do not mean those players individually caused the loss. Plus/minus is heavily influenced by lineups and opponent combinations.
Instead, the figures can help identify which lineups were most successful during this particular game.
Season Series: The Matchup Finished 2-2
The March matchup was the fourth meeting between Memphis and Minnesota during the season, and the series ended tied 2-2 based on the supplied game history.
The four results were:
- December 18: Memphis 116, Minnesota 110
- February 1: Minnesota 131, Memphis 114
- February 3: Memphis 137, Minnesota 128
- March 4: Minnesota 117, Memphis 110
The four games therefore produced a fascinating split.
Memphis won two games and Minnesota won two.
The February 3 Memphis victory was particularly high scoring, with the Grizzlies reaching 137 points. The March meeting was considerably more defensive, with Minnesota limiting Memphis to 110.
The series also demonstrates that the matchup could swing dramatically depending on shooting, availability, pace, and interior control.
What the Matchup Reveals About Both Teams
The most useful way to read these statistics is to look beyond the individual scoring leaderboard.
Minnesota’s formula
Minnesota’s winning formula in this game involved:
- Edwards providing elite shot creation.
- Randle supplying secondary scoring and rebounding.
- Gobert controlling the glass.
- McDaniels providing efficient scoring.
- Dosunmu contributing from the bench.
- DiVincenzo creating six assists.
- The team dominating offensive rebounding.
- Defensive pressure improving after halftime.
That combination allowed Minnesota to win despite making only 10 three-pointers.
Memphis’s formula
Memphis showed a different profile.
The Grizzlies:
- Shot 39% from three.
- Had 27 assists.
- Received 19 points from Wells.
- Got 15 points from Coward.
- Received 12 points and 11 rebounds from Jackson.
- Got nine assists from Clayton Jr.
- Led by five at halftime.
Those are not signs of an ineffective offensive game.
The issue was that Memphis could not sustain its advantage once Minnesota improved its defensive intensity and took control of the boards.
What Readers Should Look For in Similar Box Scores
If you regularly analyze match player statistics, it is useful to follow a consistent process.
Start with the final score, but do not stop there.
Then check:
Step 1: Shooting efficiency
Look at field-goal percentage, three-point percentage, and free throws.
This shows how effectively each team converted its scoring opportunities.
Step 2: Rebounding
Compare total rebounds and offensive rebounds.
A large rebounding difference can create extra possessions that do not appear in the basic scoring totals.
Step 3: Turnovers
Turnovers can eliminate scoring opportunities and create transition chances for the opponent.
Step 4: Paint scoring
Interior scoring can reveal whether a team is consistently getting to the basket or generating opportunities around the rim.
Step 5: Individual efficiency
Do not rank players only by points.
A player scoring 16 points on 8-of-8 shooting attempts can have a very different offensive impact from someone scoring 20 points on 8-of-22 shooting.
Step 6: Timing
Finally, determine when the important production happened.
Edwards’ 13 fourth-quarter points were more consequential than simply knowing that he scored 41 overall.
Where to Verify the Official Numbers
For readers who want to cross-check the detailed box score, the official NBA game page and box score provide the primary game record, including player minutes, shooting, rebounds, assists, steals, blocks, turnovers, and plus/minus.
Using the primary league record is preferable when checking exact player statistics because small differences can sometimes appear between secondary statistical databases.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who scored the most points in the Memphis vs Timberwolves game?
Anthony Edwards led all scorers with 41 points for Minnesota. He shot 15-of-29 from the field, 7-of-13 from three, and 4-of-4 at the free-throw line.
Who led Memphis in scoring?
Jaylen Wells led Memphis with 19 points. He made 7 of 12 field-goal attempts and 4 of 7 three-point attempts.
Who had the most rebounds?
Rudy Gobert led Minnesota with 12 rebounds, while GG Jackson led Memphis with 11.
Who had the most assists?
Walter Clayton Jr. recorded nine assists for Memphis, the highest individual assist total in the game. Donte DiVincenzo led Minnesota with six assists.
Why did Minnesota beat Memphis?
The biggest statistical reasons were Minnesota’s 52-33 rebounding advantage, 13-5 edge in offensive rebounds, stronger interior scoring, and Anthony Edwards’ 41-point performance. Minnesota also turned a five-point halftime deficit into a seven-point victory by winning the third quarter 32-20.
What was the final score?
Minnesota defeated Memphis 117-110 at Target Center. The game was the fourth meeting of the season between the teams, with the season series ending tied 2-2 according to the supplied matchup history.
Conclusion
The Memphis Grizzlies vs Timberwolves matchup was a strong example of why complete player statistics provide more value than a simple final score.
Anthony Edwards was the obvious star with 41 points, seven made three-pointers, five steals, and a +13 plus/minus. Julius Randle supplied 23 points and 11 rebounds, while Jaden McDaniels and Ayo Dosunmu added efficient scoring. Rudy Gobert’s 12 rebounds helped Minnesota establish control over the interior.
Memphis had its own standout performances. Jaylen Wells was highly efficient with 19 points on 7-of-12 shooting, GG Jackson recorded 12 points and 11 rebounds, and Walter Clayton Jr. produced nine assists. The Grizzlies also shot 39% from three and finished with 27 assists.
The decisive difference was therefore not simply shooting.
Minnesota won the possession battle.
A 52-33 rebounding advantage, 13 offensive rebounds, 50 points in the paint, and Edwards’ fourth-quarter takeover allowed the Timberwolves to overcome their 29% three-point shooting. Memphis’s strong first half showed that its offense could challenge Minnesota, but the Grizzlies could not maintain that advantage after halftime.
For anyone studying this game, the most useful takeaway is to connect individual numbers with team context. Edwards’ 41 points explain the headline. The rebounding margin, third-quarter turnaround, interior scoring, and late-game shot-making explain the victory.
