Los Angeles Chargers vs Detroit Lions Match Player Stats
The los angeles chargers vs detroit lions match player stats from the July 31, 2025 NFL Hall of Fame Game tell a much clearer story than the final score alone. The Los Angeles Chargers defeated the Detroit Lions 34-7 in a preseason matchup that featured strong quarterback play from Trey Lance, two rushing touchdowns from Kimani Vidal, and a dominant defensive performance that produced three interceptions. Detroit, meanwhile, struggled to create consistent offensive production and turned the ball over three times, with two of those fumbles lost.
Because this was a preseason game, the statistics need to be viewed in the right context. Preseason contests are primarily about evaluating depth, testing younger players, and determining how individual players perform when given meaningful opportunities. The numbers therefore do not carry exactly the same weight as regular-season statistics. Still, the game provided useful evidence about several players competing for roster positions and playing-time opportunities.
The Chargers were efficient enough on offense to build an early lead, while their defense created the biggest separation. Los Angeles scored 14 points in the first quarter and never surrendered control of the game. Detroit managed only seven points, and those points came in the second quarter. The Lions were shut out in both the third and fourth quarters.
Los Angeles Chargers vs Detroit Lions Match Player Stats: Game Overview
The final score was Los Angeles Chargers 34, Detroit Lions 7.
The Chargers entered the game with a 1-0 preseason record, while the Lions moved to 0-1. The game was played on July 31, 2025, as the NFL Hall of Fame Game.
Final Score by Quarter
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
| Los Angeles Chargers | 14 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 34 |
| Detroit Lions | 0 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
The opening quarter was especially important. Los Angeles scored 14 points before Detroit found the end zone, immediately putting pressure on the Lions’ offense.
Detroit responded with seven points in the second quarter, but the Chargers added another touchdown and carried a 21-7 advantage into halftime. Los Angeles then controlled the second half, scoring 13 unanswered points.
That second-half defensive performance is one of the most useful aspects of the box score. Detroit did not score after halftime, while Los Angeles continued to add points.
Trey Lance Leads the Chargers Passing Attack
Trey Lance was the most productive quarterback in the game and finished with the strongest individual passing line on either team.
Lance completed 13 of 20 passes for 120 yards. He averaged 6.0 yards per attempt, threw two touchdown passes, and did not throw an interception. His passer rating was 114.6.
That combination of efficiency and ball security was a major contrast to Detroit’s quarterback production.
Trey Lance Passing Stats
| Statistic | Trey Lance |
| Completions | 13 |
| Attempts | 20 |
| Completion Rate | 65.0% |
| Passing Yards | 120 |
| Average | 6.0 |
| Touchdowns | 2 |
| Interceptions | 0 |
| Sacks | 1 |
| Sack Yards | -5 |
| Passer Rating | 114.6 |
Lance’s 65 percent completion rate was particularly useful in a preseason setting because he was able to generate production without exposing the offense to unnecessary turnover risk.
He was also credited with one sack for five yards. That prevented the performance from being completely clean, but the overall passing efficiency remained strong.
Most importantly, Lance accounted for both of the Chargers’ passing touchdowns. That gave Los Angeles a quarterback who could finish drives rather than simply move the offense between the 20-yard lines.
DJ Uiagalelei Adds Depth at Quarterback
DJ Uiagalelei also received an opportunity for Los Angeles and completed two of three passes for 25 yards.
His average was 8.3 yards per attempt, and he finished without a touchdown or interception. His passer rating was 92.4.
The sample was small, so there is little value in making broad conclusions from three attempts. However, he did not turn the ball over and produced a respectable average when called upon.
Chargers Team Passing
As a team, the Chargers completed 15 of 23 passes for 140 yards.
| Statistic | Chargers |
| Completions | 15 |
| Attempts | 23 |
| Completion Rate | 65.2% |
| Passing Yards | 140 |
| Average | 6.3 |
| Touchdowns | 2 |
| Interceptions | 0 |
| Sacks | 1 |
| Sack Yards | -5 |
| Passer Rating | 111.7 |
The most important team-level figure is zero interceptions. Los Angeles protected the football through the air while Detroit failed to do the same.
Detroit Quarterback Stats Show the Biggest Offensive Problem
Detroit’s quarterback numbers were one of the clearest explanations for the 34-7 result.
Kyle Allen completed nine of 14 passes for 91 yards. He did not throw a touchdown and was intercepted twice. His passer rating was only 43.2.
Hendon Hooker completed three of six passes for 18 yards, also without a touchdown. He threw one interception and was sacked twice.
Kyle Allen Passing Stats
| Statistic | Kyle Allen |
| Completions | 9 |
| Attempts | 14 |
| Completion Rate | 64.3% |
| Passing Yards | 91 |
| Average | 6.5 |
| Touchdowns | 0 |
| Interceptions | 2 |
| Passer Rating | 43.2 |
Allen’s completion percentage was reasonable, but the two interceptions significantly reduced the value of his passing production.
This is an important distinction when evaluating quarterback statistics. Completion percentage by itself does not tell the entire story. A quarterback can complete a relatively high percentage of passes and still have a poor performance if turnovers erase scoring opportunities.
Hendon Hooker’s Passing Numbers
Hooker finished 3-for-6 for 18 yards.
His average of 3.0 yards per attempt reflected the difficulty Detroit had generating meaningful passing production during his opportunities. He also threw an interception and was sacked twice for a combined five yards.
His passer rating was 16.7.
Lions Team Passing
Detroit finished with 12 completions on 20 attempts for 104 yards.
| Statistic | Lions |
| Completions | 12 |
| Attempts | 20 |
| Completion Rate | 60.0% |
| Passing Yards | 104 |
| Average | 5.5 |
| Touchdowns | 0 |
| Interceptions | 3 |
| Sacks | 2 |
| Sack Yards | -5 |
| Passer Rating | 35.2 |
The contrast with Los Angeles is substantial.
The Chargers threw two touchdown passes and no interceptions. Detroit threw no touchdown passes and three interceptions.
That turnover differential was a central reason the game became one-sided.
Kimani Vidal Provides the Chargers’ Rushing Spark
Kimani Vidal was the leading Chargers rusher and scored two touchdowns.
Vidal carried the ball nine times for 37 yards, averaging 4.1 yards per carry. His longest run covered 16 yards.
Kimani Vidal Rushing Stats
| Statistic | Vidal |
| Carries | 9 |
| Rushing Yards | 37 |
| Average | 4.1 |
| Touchdowns | 2 |
| Longest Run | 16 yards |
The most important statistic is the two rushing touchdowns.
His 37 yards were not an enormous total, but preseason rushing production needs to be considered alongside efficiency and scoring opportunities. Vidal converted his chances into points, which helped the Chargers build and maintain their advantage.
His longest run of 16 yards also demonstrates that he was capable of creating a chunk play rather than relying exclusively on short gains.
Hassan Haskins and Nyheim Hines Add Depth
Hassan Haskins carried six times for 34 yards, producing a strong 5.7-yard average. His longest run was 11 yards.
Nyheim Hines also carried eight times for 34 yards. He averaged 4.3 yards per attempt and had a longest run of nine yards.
These numbers indicate that Los Angeles was able to spread rushing opportunities among multiple backs.
Omarion Hampton received two carries for nine yards, averaging 4.5 yards per carry. Trey Lance added three carries for eight yards.
Chargers Rushing Breakdown
| Player | Carries | Yards | Average | TD | Long |
| Kimani Vidal | 9 | 37 | 4.1 | 2 | 16 |
| Hassan Haskins | 6 | 34 | 5.7 | 0 | 11 |
| Nyheim Hines | 8 | 34 | 4.3 | 0 | 9 |
| Omarion Hampton | 2 | 9 | 4.5 | 0 | 8 |
| Trey Lance | 3 | 8 | 2.7 | 0 | 5 |
The Chargers finished with 35 rushing attempts for 121 yards and two touchdowns.
That works out to an average of 3.5 yards per carry. While that team average was not spectacular, the rushing attack was productive in the situations that mattered most.
Craig Reynolds Scores Detroit’s Only Touchdown
Craig Reynolds led the Lions in rushing and scored Detroit’s only touchdown.
He carried 10 times for 38 yards, averaging 3.8 yards per carry. His longest run was 13 yards.
Lions Rushing Leaders
| Player | Carries | Yards | Average | TD | Long |
| Craig Reynolds | 10 | 38 | 3.8 | 1 | 13 |
| Jabari Small | 11 | 35 | 3.2 | 0 | 6 |
| Hendon Hooker | 3 | 9 | 3.0 | 0 | 4 |
| Kyle Allen | 2 | 5 | 2.5 | 0 | 3 |
Jabari Small received the most rushing attempts for Detroit with 11. He gained 35 yards, averaging 3.2 yards per carry.
Detroit’s team rushing total was 93 yards on 28 attempts, an average of 3.3 yards per carry.
The Lions therefore produced some rushing volume, but they struggled to turn that volume into sustained offensive scoring.
Receiving Stats Reveal Interesting Depth Performances
The receiving statistics provide some of the more interesting individual details from the game.
For Los Angeles, KeAndre Lambert-Smith led the team with 43 receiving yards and scored one touchdown. He caught two passes on two targets and averaged 21.5 yards per reception.
His longest reception covered 28 yards.
That kind of explosive production is particularly notable in a preseason game because players competing for roster spots need to make the most of limited opportunities.
Chargers Receiving Leaders
| Player | Receptions | Yards | Average | TD | Long | Targets |
| KeAndre Lambert-Smith | 2 | 43 | 21.5 | 1 | 28 | 2 |
| Tucker Fisk | 1 | 19 | 19.0 | 0 | 19 | Not listed |
| Jaret Patterson | 2 | 18 | 9.0 | 0 | 12 | Not listed |
| Will Dissly | 2 | 14 | 7.0 | 1 | 9 | Not listed |
| Brenden Rice | 1 | 13 | 13.0 | 0 | Not listed | Not listed |
Lambert-Smith’s production stands out because of the efficiency. Two catches produced 43 yards.
Will Dissly also found the end zone, catching two passes for 14 yards and a touchdown.
The Chargers finished with 15 receptions for 145 yards and two receiving touchdowns.
Isaac TeSlaa Leads Detroit Receivers
Isaac TeSlaa was Detroit’s leading receiver by yardage.
He caught two passes for 46 yards, averaging 23.0 yards per reception. His longest reception covered 24 yards.
Lions Receiving Leaders
| Player | Receptions | Yards | Average | TD | Long | Targets |
| Isaac TeSlaa | 2 | 46 | 23.0 | 0 | 24 | 3 |
| Dominic Lovett | 5 | 31 | 6.2 | 0 | 10 | Not listed |
| Craig Reynolds | 1 | 10 | 10.0 | 0 | 10 | Not listed |
Dominic Lovett led the Lions in receptions with five and finished with 31 yards.
The Lions as a team recorded 12 receptions for 109 yards and did not produce a receiving touchdown.
This difference in scoring efficiency is important. Detroit had players capable of producing yardage, but the offense failed to turn its passing opportunities into passing touchdowns.
Turnovers Changed the Game
Turnovers were arguably the defining statistical category.
The Chargers had three total fumbles but did not lose any of them.
Detroit also had three total fumbles but lost two.
In addition, the Lions threw three interceptions while Los Angeles threw none.
That created a major advantage for the Chargers.
Chargers Turnover Details
Trey Lance was credited with one fumble, but it was not lost.
Dez Fitzpatrick and Kendall Williamson each recorded a fumble recovery for Los Angeles.
The Chargers finished without a lost fumble.
Lions Turnover Details
Grant Stuard lost a fumble.
Jakobie Keeney-James also lost a fumble.
Jabari Small had one fumble that was not lost.
Trystan Colon recorded a fumble recovery.
The combination of three interceptions and two lost fumbles gave Detroit multiple opportunities that ended without points or possession.
For a preseason roster evaluation, turnovers are especially important because they can affect a player’s chances of earning additional opportunities.
Chargers Defense Creates Three Interceptions
The defensive performance was the biggest statistical advantage for Los Angeles.
The Chargers intercepted Detroit quarterbacks three times.
Nikko Reed recorded an interception and returned it 60 yards.
Myles Purchase also intercepted a pass and returned it 48 yards.
Tony Jefferson recorded the third Chargers interception.
Together, those interceptions produced 108 return yards.
Chargers Defensive Numbers
| Category | Chargers |
| Total Tackles | 59 |
| Solo Tackles | 37 |
| Sacks | 2 |
| Tackles for Loss | 3 |
| Passes Defended | 5 |
| QB Hits | 2 |
| Interceptions | 3 |
| Interception Return Yards | 108 |
This was not simply a case of the Chargers scoring more points. Their defense consistently created negative situations for Detroit.
Five passes defended and three interceptions demonstrate that the secondary was active throughout the contest.
Detroit Defense Records 67 Tackles
Detroit’s defense recorded more total tackles than Los Angeles, finishing with 67.
However, a high tackle total does not necessarily mean a defense played better.
Detroit had one sack, five tackles for loss, one pass defended, and one quarterback hit.
Lions Defensive Numbers
| Category | Lions |
| Total Tackles | 67 |
| Solo Tackles | 35 |
| Sacks | 1 |
| Tackles for Loss | 5 |
| Passes Defended | 1 |
| QB Hits | 1 |
| Interceptions | 0 |
The difference in defensive impact can be seen in the turnover column.
Detroit recorded zero interceptions.
Los Angeles recorded three.
That is a much more meaningful indicator of the game’s outcome than total tackles alone.
Special Teams Performance
Special teams also contributed useful information.
Nyheim Hines handled one kickoff return for the Chargers and gained 39 yards. He also recorded one punt return for two yards.
The Lions had six kickoff returns for 157 total yards, averaging 26.2 yards per return. Their longest kickoff return was 36 yards.
Dominic Lovett recorded a 19-yard punt return for Detroit, while Jakobie Keeney-James added a punt return for zero yards.
Cameron Dicker Scores 10 Points
Chargers kicker Cameron Dicker converted two of three field-goal attempts and all four extra-point attempts.
He finished with 10 points.
His longest field goal was 27 yards.
Detroit kicker Jake Bates attempted no field goals and converted his only extra-point attempt, finishing with one point.
Punting Comparison
JK Scott punted three times for Los Angeles for 154 total yards.
His average was 51.3 yards per punt, with a long of 54 yards. He recorded one touchback and one punt inside the 20-yard line.
Jack Fox punted four times for Detroit for 187 yards.
His average was 46.8 yards per punt, and his longest punt covered 57 yards. He recorded one punt inside the 20.
The punting numbers were relatively strong on both sides, although Scott’s average was higher.
What the Statistics Say About the Chargers
The strongest takeaway from the game is that Los Angeles combined offensive efficiency with defensive opportunism.
The Chargers did not need extraordinary offensive yardage to win by 27 points.
Instead, they avoided major mistakes and consistently capitalized on Detroit’s errors.
Three areas stand out.
1. Quarterback Efficiency
Trey Lance produced 120 yards and two touchdowns without throwing an interception.
That gave the Chargers a stable passing attack during his time on the field.
2. Red-Zone and Scoring Production
Kimani Vidal scored twice on the ground, while Lance threw two touchdown passes.
The Chargers were able to finish drives in multiple ways.
3. Defensive Turnovers
Three interceptions were the clearest difference between the teams.
The Chargers’ defense created extra possessions and gave the offense favorable opportunities.
What the Statistics Say About the Lions
Detroit’s biggest issue was not a lack of individual effort. Several players produced respectable numbers.
The larger problem was that those individual contributions did not translate into sustained team success.
The Lions had 104 passing yards and 93 rushing yards.
They also recorded 109 receiving yards.
Those numbers show that Detroit moved the ball at times. However, the offense failed to score through the passing game and committed five combined turnovers between interceptions and lost fumbles.
That is difficult to overcome against a team that protects the football.
Quarterback Turnovers
The three interceptions were especially costly.
Kyle Allen threw two, while Hendon Hooker threw one.
Neither quarterback recorded a passing touchdown.
As a result, Detroit’s passing attack finished with a 35.2 team passer rating.
Why Preseason Statistics Need Context
It is important not to treat this game as if it were a regular-season matchup.
Preseason games are fundamentally different.
Coaches are evaluating players rather than simply trying to maximize the probability of winning. Playing time is divided among backups, rookies, young players, and veterans who may be given limited exposure.
That means one strong performance can be meaningful without automatically predicting a player’s regular-season role.
For example, Lambert-Smith’s 43 receiving yards on two catches are encouraging, but two receptions are not enough to establish a long-term production trend.
The same principle applies to quarterback statistics.
Lance’s 114.6 passer rating was excellent in this game, but preseason success must be evaluated alongside competition level, playing time, consistency, and performance across multiple games.
The most useful approach is therefore to use these numbers as evidence rather than as final judgments.
Key Statistical Differences
The most important statistical contrasts from the game can be summarized clearly.
| Category | Chargers | Lions |
| Final Score | 34 | 7 |
| Passing Yards | 140 | 104 |
| Passing TDs | 2 | 0 |
| Interceptions Thrown | 0 | 3 |
| Rushing Yards | 121 | 93 |
| Rushing TDs | 2 | 1 |
| Receiving Yards | 145 | 109 |
| Total Fumbles | 3 | 3 |
| Lost Fumbles | 0 | 2 |
| Defensive Interceptions | 3 | 0 |
| Sacks | 2 | 1 |
The table makes the overall story easy to understand.
Los Angeles was better in the most important scoring and turnover categories.
Three Players Who Stood Out for Los Angeles
Trey Lance
Lance completed 65 percent of his passes, threw two touchdowns, and avoided interceptions.
His performance was the clearest quarterback success of the game.
Kimani Vidal
Vidal converted nine carries into 37 yards and two touchdowns.
His ability to finish drives gave the Chargers valuable scoring production.
KeAndre Lambert-Smith
Lambert-Smith caught two passes for 43 yards and one touchdown.
His 21.5 yards per reception made him one of the Chargers’ most explosive receiving contributors.
Three Players Who Stood Out for Detroit
Craig Reynolds
Reynolds led Detroit’s rushing attack with 38 yards and scored the Lions’ only touchdown.
He also caught one pass for 10 yards.
Isaac TeSlaa
TeSlaa produced 46 receiving yards on two catches, averaging 23.0 yards per reception.
He provided Detroit with one of its strongest big-play receiving performances.
Dominic Lovett
Lovett caught five passes for 31 yards and added a 19-yard punt return.
His five receptions were the most among Lions receivers listed in the supplied statistics.
A Closer Look at Offensive Efficiency
The Chargers finished with 140 passing yards and 121 rushing yards.
Detroit finished with 104 passing yards and 93 rushing yards.
That means Los Angeles produced 64 more yards between passing and rushing.
More importantly, the Chargers scored four offensive touchdowns through the passing and rushing games, while Detroit scored only one rushing touchdown.
The difference was therefore not just volume.
It was efficiency in turning possessions into points.
A team can gain yardage and still struggle if drives end in turnovers, punts, or failed scoring opportunities. That was a major issue for Detroit in this contest.
The Importance of Ball Security
The turnover numbers deserve special attention because they explain the 27-point margin better than many of the raw yardage totals.
Los Angeles threw zero interceptions and lost zero fumbles.
Detroit threw three interceptions and lost two fumbles.
That means Detroit effectively surrendered five possessions through interceptions or lost fumbles.
The Chargers did not give away a possession through a lost fumble or interception.
For any football team, that is a substantial advantage.
In preseason football, the lesson is even more relevant for players fighting for roster positions. Coaches need players who can execute their assignments while protecting the football.
What Fans Should Take From These Player Stats
The most useful way to read this box score is to separate individual production from team results.
Several Detroit players generated respectable numbers.
TeSlaa averaged 23.0 yards per reception.
Reynolds rushed for 38 yards and scored.
Lovett caught five passes.
Yet Detroit still scored only seven points.
That demonstrates why individual statistics should always be connected to game context.
The same applies to Los Angeles.
Vidal’s 37 rushing yards may not look extraordinary by itself, but two touchdowns made his contribution much more significant.
Lance’s 120 passing yards also become more meaningful because he produced two touchdowns without an interception.
How to Interpret the Game for Future Matchups
When reviewing future Chargers or Lions preseason games, several categories from this matchup are worth monitoring.
First, quarterback turnover rate should be tracked across multiple games rather than relying on one performance.
Second, running back efficiency should be evaluated through carries, yards per attempt, explosive runs, and touchdown opportunities.
Third, receiving production should include both volume and efficiency. A receiver with two catches for 43 yards has a very different statistical profile from one with five catches for 31 yards.
Fourth, defensive takeaways should be monitored over time.
A single game with three interceptions is impressive, but it does not automatically establish that a defense will consistently generate turnovers.
Finally, special teams should not be ignored. Players who contribute on kickoff coverage, punt returns, field goals, and punting can become important parts of a roster even when offensive or defensive statistics are limited.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who won the Chargers vs Lions Hall of Fame Game?
The Los Angeles Chargers defeated the Detroit Lions 34-7 on July 31, 2025.
Who was the Chargers’ leading passer?
Trey Lance was the Chargers’ leading passer. He completed 13 of 20 passes for 120 yards, two touchdowns, and zero interceptions.
Who led the Chargers in rushing?
Kimani Vidal led the Chargers with nine carries for 37 yards and two touchdowns.
Who was Detroit’s leading rusher?
Craig Reynolds led the Lions with 10 carries for 38 yards and one touchdown.
How many interceptions did the Chargers record?
The Chargers recorded three interceptions. Nikko Reed, Myles Purchase, and Tony Jefferson each recorded one.
How many turnovers did the Lions commit?
Detroit threw three interceptions and lost two fumbles. Jabari Small also had a fumble that was not lost.
Conclusion
The los angeles chargers vs detroit lions match player stats from the July 31, 2025 Hall of Fame Game show a matchup decided by much more than the final 34-7 score.
Trey Lance provided the Chargers with efficient quarterback play, completing 13 of 20 passes for 120 yards and two touchdowns without an interception. Kimani Vidal added two rushing touchdowns, while KeAndre Lambert-Smith delivered 43 receiving yards and a touchdown on only two catches.
Detroit had some individual bright spots. Craig Reynolds scored the Lions’ only touchdown and led the rushing attack with 38 yards. Isaac TeSlaa produced 46 receiving yards, and Dominic Lovett caught five passes for 31 yards.
The decisive difference, however, was turnovers.
Los Angeles intercepted Detroit quarterbacks three times and did not throw an interception. The Chargers also lost no fumbles, while Detroit lost two. That combination gave Los Angeles extra possessions and prevented the Lions from turning their yardage into sustained scoring drives.
The game should also be viewed through the lens of preseason football. The statistics provide useful evidence about individual execution, depth, ball security, and potential roster competition, but they should not be treated as definitive predictions of regular-season performance.
Overall, the numbers point to a Chargers team that was more efficient with its opportunities and significantly more successful at protecting the football, while Detroit struggled to finish drives and avoid costly mistakes.
