Mets vs St. Louis Cardinals Match Player Stats
Mets vs St. Louis Cardinals match player stats from the June 9, 2026 game tell a clear story of pitching control, timely hitting, and missed opportunities. The St. Louis Cardinals defeated the New York Mets 7-0 at Citi Field, collecting 10 hits while holding New York to only five hits. Dustin May delivered six scoreless innings for St. Louis, while Alec Burleson supplied three RBIs and a home run.
There is also an important date clarification for readers comparing different box scores. The 7-0 game described here was played on June 9, 2026. The following day’s Cardinals-Mets game was a separate contest that St. Louis won 9-2. This distinction matters because both games appeared in the same series and several of the same players contributed in both contests.
For readers searching for a complete breakdown, the most useful approach is not simply to look at the final score. The individual batting lines, pitching performances, scoring sequence, runners left on base, and situational hitting explain why the Cardinals controlled this game from the third inning onward.
Mets vs St. Louis Cardinals Match Player Stats: Game Overview
The Cardinals won the game 7-0 and improved their record to 36-28. The Mets fell to 29-37. The game was played at Citi Field in Queens, New York, with Rob Drake serving as the home plate umpire.
| Category | St. Louis Cardinals | New York Mets |
| Runs | 7 | 0 |
| Hits | 10 | 5 |
| Errors | 0 | 0 |
| Home Runs | 1 | 0 |
| RBIs | 7 | 0 |
| Walks | 2 | 1 |
| Strikeouts | 6 | 9 |
| Team RISP | 3-for-10 | 0-for-3 |
| Left on Base | 6 | 5 |
The scoreboard shows the most obvious difference: St. Louis converted its opportunities while New York failed to produce a single run.
The Cardinals scored all seven runs across three innings. They broke the game open with four runs in the third, added two in the fifth, and scored another in the seventh. The Mets never put together a scoring inning.
That scoring pattern is important because it shows the game was not simply a one-inning fluke. St. Louis created pressure early, extended its advantage with power, and then added another insurance run later.
Final Score and Run Distribution
The Cardinals entered the third inning with the game still scoreless. That changed quickly.
St. Louis scored four runs in the top of the third. JJ Wetherholt delivered a two-run single, Jordan Walker followed with an RBI double, and Lars Nootbaar brought home another run on a groundout. By the end of the inning, the Cardinals had created a 4-0 advantage.
The fifth inning produced another major blow. Alec Burleson hit a two-run home run against Freddy Peralta, pushing the Cardinals’ lead to 6-0. MLB’s Statcast information lists the home run at 377 feet with a 101.0 mph exit velocity.
Burleson added another RBI in the seventh inning when he doubled to right field, allowing Iván Herrera to score.
The final scoring sequence was therefore:
| Inning | Cardinals Runs | Mets Runs | Main Event |
| 1st | 0 | 0 | Scoreless |
| 2nd | 0 | 0 | Both pitchers escape threats |
| 3rd | 4 | 0 | Wetherholt, Walker and Nootbaar drive in runs |
| 4th | 0 | 0 | May keeps Mets scoreless |
| 5th | 2 | 0 | Burleson hits two-run homer |
| 6th | 0 | 0 | Cardinals maintain control |
| 7th | 1 | 0 | Burleson adds RBI double |
| 8th | 0 | 0 | Mets remain scoreless |
| 9th | 0 | 0 | St. Louis closes out shutout |
The scoring sequence demonstrates how the Cardinals combined contact hitting, extra-base power, and pitching stability.
Cardinals Batting Player Stats
St. Louis finished with 36 at-bats, 10 hits, seven runs, seven RBIs, one home run, two walks, and six strikeouts.
JJ Wetherholt
JJ Wetherholt went 1-for-5 with one run and two RBIs.
His biggest contribution came in the third inning when he singled to center field and drove home Nolan Gorman and Nathan Church. That hit changed the tone of the game.
Wetherholt did not need multiple hits to influence the result. His two-run single came at exactly the right moment and gave St. Louis its first significant advantage.
Iván Herrera
Iván Herrera was one of the most efficient hitters in the lineup. He went 3-for-3 and scored three runs.
His three hits were especially important because he repeatedly reached base and created opportunities for the hitters behind him. He was also hit by a pitch twice during the game.
Herrera’s three runs were the most by any player in the contest. Although he did not record an RBI, his ability to reach base helped drive the Cardinals’ offense.
Alec Burleson
Alec Burleson was arguably the most productive offensive player in the game.
He finished 2-for-5 with one run, three RBIs, one home run, and one double. His three RBIs led all players.
His fifth-inning home run was the biggest power swing of the night. Burleson’s two-run shot extended the Cardinals’ lead from four runs to six and effectively removed any realistic comeback opportunity.
He then added an RBI double in the seventh inning, scoring Herrera and completing his three-RBI performance.
For evaluating player impact, Burleson’s line is a strong example of why RBI production should be considered alongside total hits and extra-base hits. His two hits produced six total bases and three RBIs.
Jordan Walker
Jordan Walker went 1-for-5 with one RBI.
His hit was particularly valuable because it came as an RBI double during the four-run third inning. That double followed Wetherholt’s two-run single and continued the Cardinals’ offensive momentum.
Walker finished with two total bases from his double.
Lars Nootbaar
Lars Nootbaar went 0-for-4 but still contributed an RBI.
That is a useful reminder that a player can influence a game without recording a hit. Nootbaar’s groundout brought Herrera home during the third-inning rally.
Masyn Winn
Masyn Winn went 0-for-4 and did not record an RBI or run.
His offensive line was quiet, but the Cardinals did not need every player to produce because the middle and lower portions of the lineup created enough scoring opportunities.
Jimmy Crooks
Jimmy Crooks went 0-for-4 and struck out twice.
His night was one of the quieter offensive performances in the Cardinals lineup, but St. Louis still generated enough production elsewhere to win comfortably.
Nolan Gorman
Nolan Gorman went 0-for-2 but walked twice and scored once.
His ability to reach base without a hit helped start the third-inning rally. Gorman’s plate appearances illustrate another important point when reading player stats: batting average alone does not explain how often a hitter contributes to an inning.
Nathan Church
Nathan Church went 3-for-4 and scored once.
His three hits tied Herrera for the Cardinals’ team lead. Church also doubled during the third-inning rally, putting himself in position to score on Wetherholt’s single.
His performance was especially valuable because he combined contact hitting with a major defensive contribution.
Mets Batting Player Stats
The Mets managed only five hits and no runs. They had one walk and struck out nine times.
Carson Benge
Carson Benge went 1-for-4 with one strikeout.
His lone hit was not enough to create a scoring opportunity that the Mets could convert.
Bo Bichette
Bo Bichette went 0-for-4 and struck out once.
The Cardinals’ pitching staff prevented him from getting on base and kept one of the Mets’ prominent lineup spots from generating offensive pressure.
Juan Soto
Juan Soto went 1-for-3 with one walk.
His ability to reach base was one of the few positive elements for New York’s offense. However, the Mets could not turn that baserunner production into runs.
Jared Young
Jared Young went 0-for-4.
He did not record a hit, walk, or strikeout, but his lack of production contributed to the Mets’ inability to build sustained innings.
A.J. Ewing
A.J. Ewing went 2-for-4 and recorded both of his team’s extra offensive hits.
His two hits included a double, making him one of the most productive Mets hitters on the night.
Ewing also made a notable defensive play. MLB highlighted his outfield work during the game, while May later discussed how difficult the catch was because of the conditions at Citi Field.
Marcus Semien
Marcus Semien went 0-for-3 with one walk and one strikeout.
The Cardinals prevented him from generating the type of offensive production needed to extend innings.
Brett Baty
Brett Baty went 0-for-3 and struck out twice.
His two strikeouts contributed to the Mets’ nine-strikeout total.
MJ Melendez
MJ Melendez went 0-for-2 and struck out twice.
The Mets eventually used Mark Vientos as a pinch hitter, but New York still finished without a run.
Francisco Alvarez
Francisco Alvarez went 1-for-3 with one strikeout.
His hit was one of only five produced by New York’s lineup.
Pitching Comparison
The pitching matchup was one of the biggest reasons the Cardinals won.
Dustin May started for St. Louis, while Freddy Peralta started for New York. May threw six scoreless innings, allowed four hits, walked one batter, and struck out six. Peralta also worked six innings, but he allowed six runs on six hits with two walks and five strikeouts.
| Pitcher | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K |
| Dustin May | 6.0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 |
| J. Bruihl | 2.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| M. Svanson | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Freddy Peralta | 6.0 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 2 | 5 |
| J. Gerber | 2.0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| C. Pérez | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
The comparison is striking because both starting pitchers completed six innings.
The difference was run prevention.
May allowed zero runs.
Peralta allowed six earned runs.
That six-run difference was effectively the game.
Dustin May’s Winning Performance
Dustin May earned the win and improved to 4-6.
His final line was six innings, four hits, no runs, one walk, and six strikeouts. MLB reported that he threw 101 pitches, including 70 strikes, and generated 16 first-pitch strikes. His fastball reached 98.5 mph.
May’s performance was not simply about strikeouts.
The Mets did have opportunities.
A.J. Ewing doubled in the second inning and later reached third after a passed ball. May responded by striking out Marcus Semien and Brett Baty to end the threat.
That sequence is important when assessing pitching performance. A pitcher can allow baserunners and still control the game if he consistently prevents those runners from scoring.
May also benefited from strong defensive support.
In the fourth inning, the Mets had runners on first and second with two outs. Marcus Semien hit a deep ball toward center field, but Nathan Church made a difficult basket catch to end the threat. MLB’s game report described the play as a major defensive contribution to May’s shutout.
Freddy Peralta’s Losing Performance
Freddy Peralta took the loss and fell to 4-5.
His final line was six innings, six hits, six runs, six earned runs, two walks, and five strikeouts.
The most damaging inning was the third.
Peralta faced a Cardinals lineup that produced four runs in the inning. Wetherholt’s two-run single started the damage, Walker added an RBI double, and Nootbaar brought home another run.
Peralta then surrendered Burleson’s two-run homer in the fifth.
That home run was particularly damaging because it came after the Cardinals had already established a four-run lead. Instead of allowing New York to remain within striking distance, it pushed the game into a six-run deficit.
The Cardinals’ Offensive Efficiency
The Cardinals scored seven runs from 10 hits.
That works out to 0.70 runs per hit.
The number is not a standard baseball statistic, but it provides a simple way to understand how efficiently St. Louis converted its hits into runs.
The Cardinals also went 3-for-10 with runners in scoring position.
That 30 percent conversion rate may not look spectacular at first glance, but it was enough because the Cardinals created several high-leverage opportunities and also received a home run from Burleson.
The key was sequencing.
Wetherholt’s single did not simply add another hit. It brought home two runners.
Walker’s double did not simply add another extra-base hit. It extended the rally.
Burleson’s home run did not merely increase his personal statistics. It turned a four-run game into a six-run game.
This is why box-score analysis should focus on when production occurred, not only how much production occurred.
Why the Mets Could Not Score
The Mets had five hits but finished with zero runs.
Their team RISP mark was 0-for-3.
That is perhaps the clearest statistical explanation for the shutout.
New York did get baserunners. Ewing doubled. Soto reached base twice through a hit and walk. Alvarez collected a hit. But the Mets never combined enough baserunner traffic with timely hitting to create a scoring inning.
The nine strikeouts also hurt.
A strikeout is not automatically damaging, but repeated strikeouts reduce opportunities to advance runners and can end innings without allowing the defense to make a play.
Against a pitcher such as May, who was already avoiding major mistakes, New York needed to capitalize on its limited opportunities.
It did not.
Third Inning Was the Turning Point
The third inning deserves special attention because it effectively decided the game.
St. Louis entered the inning in a scoreless tie.
By the end of the frame, the Cardinals led 4-0.
The rally included:
- Nolan Gorman reached base with a walk.
- Nathan Church doubled.
- JJ Wetherholt singled and drove in two runs.
- Jordan Walker doubled and brought home another run.
- Lars Nootbaar grounded out to bring home another run.
Four runs were produced through a combination of walks, extra-base hitting, contact hitting, and productive outs.
That is a complete offensive inning.
It was not dependent on one isolated home run.
The Cardinals built pressure, moved runners, and repeatedly converted opportunities.
Alec Burleson’s Two-Way Offensive Impact
Burleson’s performance deserves separate attention because he was involved in the game’s two biggest scoring developments.
His fifth-inning home run traveled 377 feet and left the bat at 101.0 mph.
He then doubled in the seventh.
His final line:
| Statistic | Burleson |
| At-bats | 5 |
| Runs | 1 |
| Hits | 2 |
| RBIs | 3 |
| Home Runs | 1 |
| Doubles | 1 |
| Strikeouts | 2 |
| Total Bases | 6 |
Six total bases from five at-bats is a strong individual offensive contribution.
More importantly, his production directly affected the scoreboard.
The home run created two runs, while the seventh-inning double added another.
That is the type of player performance that can dominate a shutout game without requiring a huge number of plate appearances.
Iván Herrera’s Three-Hit Game
Herrera’s 3-for-3 performance was another major part of the Cardinals’ success.
He scored three times, which means every one of his plate appearances that resulted in a hit eventually became part of the Cardinals’ scoring story.
He also reached base twice after being hit by pitches.
His overall involvement illustrates how important lineup depth can be.
Even when the biggest RBI numbers came from Wetherholt and Burleson, Herrera repeatedly created traffic on the bases.
Nathan Church’s Contribution
Nathan Church went 3-for-4.
His offensive contribution included a double and a run scored, but his defensive work may have been equally important.
His fourth-inning basket catch helped protect May’s shutout when the Mets had runners aboard. MLB’s postgame report specifically highlighted the play as a key defensive moment.
This is a useful lesson for anyone studying player stats.
A basic batting table cannot capture every important contribution.
Church’s offensive line explains part of his value. His defensive play explains another part.
Mets Offensive Bright Spots
Despite the shutout, the Mets were not completely without individual positives.
A.J. Ewing was 2-for-4 with a double.
Juan Soto was 1-for-3 with a walk.
Francisco Alvarez went 1-for-3.
Carson Benge went 1-for-4.
Those four players accounted for all five Mets hits.
The problem was that those hits did not come together in productive sequences.
That distinction is crucial.
A team can have several players with respectable individual batting lines and still fail to score if those performances are isolated.
The Mets’ 0-for-3 performance with runners in scoring position shows exactly that problem.
Mets vs St. Louis Cardinals Match Player Stats: What the Numbers Really Show
The most important lesson from this matchup is that the final score was supported by several independent statistical advantages.
St. Louis had:
- Five more hits than New York
- Seven runs compared with zero
- Three RBIs from Burleson alone
- One home run
- Four doubles
- A 3-for-10 RISP performance
- Nine team strikeouts by its pitching staff
- Zero runs allowed
New York had:
- Five hits
- Zero runs
- Zero RBIs
- No home runs
- One double
- A 0-for-3 RISP performance
- Nine strikeouts at the plate
The Cardinals therefore won in both run creation and run prevention.
That combination is usually much more important than any single individual statistic.
What Fantasy Baseball Players Can Learn
For fantasy baseball analysis, the game provides several useful signals.
Burleson’s home run and three RBIs made him the most obvious offensive standout.
Herrera’s three hits and three runs also made his performance valuable.
Church’s three hits provided strong batting production, while Wetherholt’s two RBIs increased his overall impact.
On the pitching side, May’s six innings, six strikeouts, and zero earned runs produced the strongest fantasy line of the game.
Peralta’s five strikeouts provided some value, but the six earned runs significantly damaged his performance.
This demonstrates why fantasy evaluation should consider the complete stat line rather than focusing on strikeouts or hits alone.
What Advanced Baseball Readers Should Notice
A deeper reading of this game reveals three major themes.
First, the Cardinals controlled the strike zone well enough to generate scoring opportunities without relying on excessive walks.
Second, St. Louis produced extra-base hits at important moments. Four doubles and one home run accounted for a significant portion of the team’s offensive damage.
Third, May’s ability to strand runners prevented the Mets from turning occasional baserunners into actual runs.
The combination created a game in which the Cardinals were consistently more dangerous whenever they had an opportunity.
Game Score Perspective
The supplied data identifies May with a Game Score of 69 and Peralta with a Game Score of 39.
Those figures align with the broader story of the contest.
May’s score reflects six innings of shutout baseball with six strikeouts and limited baserunner damage.
Peralta’s lower score reflects the six earned runs he surrendered despite also completing six innings and recording five strikeouts.
Game Score is useful as a quick summary, but it should not replace the full pitching line.
A pitcher can have a respectable strikeout total while still allowing too much damaging contact.
That is essentially what happened to Peralta.
The Importance of Situational Hitting
One of the clearest differences between the teams was situational execution.
St. Louis went 3-for-10 with runners in scoring position.
New York went 0-for-3.
The raw difference is only three successful RISP opportunities, but the scoreboard impact was much larger.
Wetherholt’s two-run single came with runners in scoring position.
Walker’s double brought home another runner.
Nootbaar’s groundout produced another run.
Burleson’s home run then created two more runs without requiring a runner in scoring position.
Burleson’s seventh-inning double added the final run.
The Cardinals therefore found multiple ways to convert opportunities.
The Mets did not.
Defensive Support Was Also Important
Baseball is often reduced to batting and pitching statistics, but this game showed why defense matters.
Church’s fourth-inning catch prevented a potential extra-base hit from becoming a serious threat against May. That defensive play helped preserve a shutout that could otherwise have become more complicated.
Both teams finished without an error.
So this was not a game decided by sloppy defense.
Instead, it was decided by execution.
St. Louis made the important plays when opportunities appeared.
Series Context
The 7-0 result was the first game of the series.
The Cardinals later won the next game 9-2 before the Mets won the third game 5-4, meaning St. Louis took the three-game series 2-1. The June 10 game should therefore not be confused with the June 9 shutout when comparing individual player statistics.
This distinction is especially important for anyone building an article around match statistics because search results can combine multiple games from the same series.
When comparing player performances, always confirm the exact game date and game identifier before publishing.
Data Accuracy Note
The supplied statistical table contains many figures that match the June 9, 2026 Cardinals-Mets game, including the 7-0 score, Dustin May’s six shutout innings, Freddy Peralta’s six earned runs, Burleson’s three RBIs, the 10-5 hit advantage, and the 36-28 and 29-37 team records.
However, the supplied table labels the game as June 10.
Official MLB records identify the 7-0 game as June 9, 2026. The June 10 game was a separate 9-2 Cardinals victory, with Andre Pallante defeating the Mets after six innings.
For publication purposes, the June 9 date should be used with the 7-0 box score.
The official MLB game record is the best source to consult when verifying the date, scoring sequence, and player lines. Official MLB game record
Key Takeaways From the Match
The most important statistics can be summarized simply.
St. Louis scored seven runs from 10 hits while New York produced five hits without scoring.
Dustin May was the winning pitcher after six scoreless innings.
Freddy Peralta was charged with six earned runs in six innings.
Alec Burleson led the Cardinals with three RBIs and hit a two-run home run.
Iván Herrera went 3-for-3 and scored three runs.
Nathan Church also collected three hits.
JJ Wetherholt delivered the game’s biggest early hit with a two-run single.
Jordan Walker added an RBI double.
The Mets’ five hits came from Carson Benge, Juan Soto, A.J. Ewing, and Francisco Alvarez, with Ewing recording two hits.
The Mets went 0-for-3 with runners in scoring position.
The Cardinals went 3-for-10 in those situations.
Those numbers explain the result far better than the final score alone.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the final score between the Mets and Cardinals?
The St. Louis Cardinals defeated the New York Mets 7-0 on June 9, 2026, at Citi Field.
Who was the winning pitcher?
Dustin May earned the win after throwing six scoreless innings, allowing four hits, one walk, and striking out six batters.
Who was the best hitter for the Cardinals?
Alec Burleson was the biggest run producer, going 2-for-5 with three RBIs, a home run, and a double.
How many hits did the Mets have?
The Mets recorded five hits and scored no runs.
How did Freddy Peralta perform?
Peralta pitched six innings and allowed six runs, all earned, on six hits. He also walked two and struck out five.
Was the game played on June 10, 2026?
No. The 7-0 game featuring Dustin May and Freddy Peralta was played on June 9, 2026. The Cardinals and Mets played another game on June 10, which St. Louis won 9-2.
Conclusion
The Mets vs St. Louis Cardinals match player stats from the June 9, 2026 matchup show a game decided by complete execution rather than one isolated statistic.
St. Louis combined 10 hits with timely scoring, extra-base power, and excellent pitching. Alec Burleson supplied three RBIs and a home run, while Iván Herrera and Nathan Church each collected three hits. JJ Wetherholt’s two-run single was the key blow during the four-run third inning.
Dustin May was equally important on the mound. His six scoreless innings prevented the Mets from turning their five hits into meaningful offense. The Cardinals’ bullpen then completed the shutout.
For New York, A.J. Ewing and Juan Soto provided some of the few offensive positives, but the lineup went 0-for-3 with runners in scoring position and struck out nine times.
The most important statistical contrast is therefore simple: St. Louis converted opportunities, while New York did not.
One final point is essential for accurate publishing. The 7-0 game belongs to June 9, not June 10. The following day’s 9-2 result was a separate game. Using the correct date prevents the player statistics from being mixed across two different games in the same series.
