Houston Rockets vs Atlanta Hawks Match Player Stats

The houston rockets vs atlanta hawks match player stats from the NBA Regular Season clash on 30 January 2026 reveal far more than the final score. Houston earned a convincing 104 to 86 victory at State Farm Arena in Atlanta by controlling the glass, protecting the rim, and taking over the second half. While Atlanta remained competitive early, Houston’s balanced offense and elite defensive effort created a comfortable win. Looking beyond the scoreboard, the individual performances explain why the Rockets finished on top and how several key players influenced every phase of the game.

This detailed breakdown explores every major statistic from the matchup, including scoring leaders, rebounding, assists, shooting efficiency, defensive impact, team trends, and quarter by quarter analysis. Rather than simply listing numbers, the goal is to explain what those numbers mean and how they shaped the outcome.

Match Overview

Match Detail	Information
Event	Houston Rockets vs Atlanta Hawks
Competition	NBA Regular Season 2025 to 26
Date	30 January 2026
Venue	State Farm Arena, Atlanta, Georgia
Attendance	16,602
Final Score	Houston Rockets 104, Atlanta Hawks 86
Winner	Houston Rockets
Season Series	Houston leads 1 to 0

Houston entered the contest with a 29 and 17 record, while Atlanta stood at 24 and 26. Although both teams had playoff ambitions, Houston played with greater consistency on both ends of the floor. The Rockets never allowed Atlanta to establish offensive momentum during the second half, turning a close game into a decisive victory.

Houston Rockets vs Atlanta Hawks Match Player Stats Summary

The houston rockets vs atlanta hawks match player stats clearly highlight Houston’s superiority in rebounding, rim protection, and offensive execution.

Team Statistics

Category	Houston Rockets	Atlanta Hawks
Points	104	86
Field Goals	39 of 92 (42%)	34 of 93 (37%)
Three Pointers	12 of 31 (39%)	12 of 39 (31%)
Free Throws	14 of 20 (70%)	6 of 7 (86%)
Rebounds	59	46
Assists	23	19
Turnovers	11	12
Steals	8	7
Blocks	14	5

These numbers reveal why Houston controlled the game.

Key advantages included:

• Thirteen more rebounds.
• Nine additional blocked shots.
• Higher three point accuracy.
• Better overall shooting percentage.
• More offensive opportunities through rebounding.

Atlanta actually committed only one more turnover than Houston, but the Hawks struggled to convert possessions into efficient offense.

Quarter by Quarter Breakdown

First Quarter

Team	Points
Houston	23
Atlanta	23

Both teams began aggressively. Houston attacked inside through Alperen Sengun, while Atlanta relied on balanced scoring from multiple players. Neither side created separation.

Second Quarter

Team	Points
Houston	20
Atlanta	19

Defense became the story.

Houston limited easy baskets while Kevin Durant started finding his rhythm offensively. The Rockets entered halftime with only a one point lead, showing how competitive the opening half truly was.

Third Quarter

Team	Points
Houston	35
Atlanta	24

This period completely changed the game.

Houston increased defensive intensity, forced difficult shots, and capitalized in transition. Kevin Durant caught fire, while Houston’s interior defense prevented Atlanta from answering.

Fourth Quarter

Team	Points
Houston	26
Atlanta	20

Instead of protecting a lead conservatively, Houston continued attacking. Their rebounding dominance limited Atlanta to one shot on many possessions, allowing the Rockets to comfortably secure victory.

Houston Rockets Player Statistics Analysis

Houston’s starting lineup combined star power with disciplined team basketball.

Kevin Durant Leads the Offense

Kevin Durant delivered the game’s best individual performance.

Statistics

• 31 points
• Game leading scorer

Durant consistently scored from multiple areas of the floor.

His offensive performance stood out because he:

• Created his own shot.
• Punished defensive switches.
• Scored efficiently throughout the second half.
• Helped Houston pull away during the decisive third quarter.

Rather than forcing difficult attempts, Durant let the offense develop naturally before attacking.

Alperen Sengun Dominates the Paint

Sengun’s impact extended well beyond scoring.

Statistics

• 13 rebounds
• Team leader in rebounding

His work inside gave Houston repeated second chance opportunities while preventing Atlanta from controlling the boards.

Several possessions ended because Sengun boxed out effectively before securing defensive rebounds.

Amen Thompson Controls the Tempo

Although he finished with only five assists, Amen Thompson played an important role in Houston’s offense.

His contributions included:

• 5 assists
• Ball movement
• Transition play
• Defensive pressure

Instead of chasing personal scoring numbers, Thompson consistently made smart passing decisions that kept Houston’s offense balanced.

Jabari Smith Jr.

Smith helped stretch Atlanta’s defense through floor spacing while contributing valuable minutes on both ends.

Although he was not Houston’s statistical leader, his presence forced Atlanta’s defenders away from the basket, creating driving lanes for teammates.

Josh Okogie

Okogie brought defensive energy from the opening tip.

His willingness to defend multiple positions helped Houston limit Atlanta’s perimeter production throughout critical stretches.

Houston’s Bench Contributions

One overlooked reason for Houston’s success was the depth provided by its reserve players.

Bench players included:

• Jeff Green
• Jae’Sean Tate
• Isaiah Crawford
• Clint Capela
• Aaron Holiday
• JD Davison
• Reed Sheppard

Rather than relying exclusively on starters, Houston maintained defensive intensity whenever substitutions occurred.

That consistency prevented Atlanta from taking advantage during rotation changes.

Atlanta Hawks Player Statistics Analysis

Although Atlanta lost by eighteen points, several individual performances remained encouraging.

CJ McCollum Provides Instant Offense

Coming off the bench, CJ McCollum became Atlanta’s leading scorer.

Statistics

• 23 points

McCollum consistently attacked from mid range and beyond the arc while keeping Atlanta competitive.

Without his offensive production, the margin could have become much larger much earlier.

Nickeil Alexander Walker Impresses

Alexander Walker finished with:

• 20 points

He attacked confidently, made timely shots, and displayed excellent scoring balance.

His performance demonstrated why he remains one of Atlanta’s most reliable offensive contributors.

Dyson Daniels Creates Opportunities

Daniels led Atlanta in assists.

Statistics

• 7 assists

His court vision generated quality scoring opportunities despite Houston’s defensive pressure.

Unfortunately for Atlanta, teammates struggled to convert enough of those chances consistently.

Rebounding Leaders

Atlanta did not have one dominant rebounder.

Instead, three players shared the team lead.

• Christian Koloko
• Asa Newell
• Luke Kennard

Each collected:

• 7 rebounds

Although respectable individually, Atlanta’s committee approach could not match Sengun’s inside presence or Houston’s overall rebounding advantage.

Atlanta Starting Lineup

Atlanta opened with:

• Corey Kispert
• Christian Koloko
• Nickeil Alexander Walker
• Vit Krejci
• Dyson Daniels

The starters competed well early but struggled after halftime against Houston’s improved defensive pressure.

Atlanta Bench Performance

Atlanta’s reserves included:

• Mouhamed Gueye
• Asa Newell
• CJ McCollum
• Luke Kennard
• Keaton Wallace
• Jalen Johnson
• Zaccharie Risacher

McCollum clearly provided the biggest offensive spark from this group, while Kennard added rebounding support.

Despite strong individual moments, the bench could not overcome Houston’s balanced production.

Shooting Efficiency Comparison

One of the most revealing aspects of the houston rockets vs atlanta hawks match player stats was shooting efficiency.

Shooting Category	Houston	Atlanta
FG Percentage	42%	37%
Three Point Percentage	39%	31%
Free Throw Percentage	70%	86%

Atlanta actually shot a better percentage from the free throw line.

However, that statistic carried limited value because the Hawks attempted only seven free throws compared to Houston’s twenty attempts.

Houston generated more aggressive offensive possessions while creating better shot quality throughout the game.

Why Houston Won the Game

Looking deeper into the houston rockets vs atlanta hawks match player stats, the final score was not simply the result of one hot shooting performance. Houston outperformed Atlanta in several key statistical categories that consistently translate into winning basketball.

Houston Controlled the Rebounding Battle

Rebounding often determines possession totals, and possession totals frequently determine the outcome of close NBA games.

Houston finished with:

• 59 total rebounds

Atlanta collected:

• 46 total rebounds

That difference of 13 rebounds gave Houston extra offensive possessions while preventing Atlanta from creating second chance opportunities.

Alperen Sengun anchored the effort with 13 rebounds, but the entire Rockets lineup contributed. Guards crashed the defensive glass, wings boxed out effectively, and the team’s collective effort limited Atlanta’s opportunities inside.

Rim Protection Changed Everything

Perhaps the most impressive defensive statistic belonged to Houston’s shot blockers.

Houston recorded:

• 14 blocks

Atlanta finished with:

• 5 blocks

Blocking shots does more than prevent points. It also changes offensive decision making.

As the game progressed, Atlanta’s players became increasingly hesitant to attack the basket. Instead, they settled for tougher perimeter shots, which contributed to their 37 percent shooting from the field.

Better Ball Movement

Houston also demonstrated stronger offensive organization.

Team assists:

• Houston: 23
• Atlanta: 19

Although the difference appears small, it reflected Houston’s ability to generate cleaner scoring opportunities.

Rather than relying on isolation basketball, the Rockets consistently moved the ball until the defense broke down.

Three Point Shooting Efficiency

Both teams made 12 three pointers.

The difference came from efficiency.

Houston

• 12 of 31
• 39 percent

Atlanta

• 12 of 39
• 31 percent

Atlanta needed eight additional attempts to make the same number of shots.

Those missed possessions helped Houston gradually build separation throughout the second half.

Individual Player Performance Breakdown

Kevin Durant’s Leadership Performance

Kevin Durant finished with 31 points, but the numbers alone do not fully describe his impact.

Watching how Houston’s offense developed, Durant rarely forced difficult shots early in possessions.

Instead, he allowed the offense to create movement before attacking.

Several qualities stood out.

Efficient Shot Selection

Durant consistently found high percentage scoring opportunities rather than settling for contested attempts.

Offensive Patience

Whenever Atlanta attempted defensive adjustments, Durant waited for favorable matchups before attacking.

Veteran Decision Making

Rather than chasing individual statistics, Durant trusted teammates when double teams arrived.

That balanced approach allowed Houston’s offense to remain unpredictable.

Alperen Sengun’s Interior Presence

Modern NBA basketball often emphasizes perimeter scoring, but interior play remains equally important.

Sengun’s 13 rebounds influenced nearly every quarter.

His contributions included:

• Defensive rebounding
• Offensive rebounding
• Interior defense
• Screen setting
• Physical play

Many possessions ended because Sengun secured rebounds that prevented Atlanta from earning extra scoring chances.

Amen Thompson’s Impact Beyond Assists

Five assists may not immediately stand out on a box score.

However, Thompson influenced the game through multiple areas.

He consistently:

• Pushed the pace after rebounds.
• Applied defensive pressure.
• Initiated offensive sets.
• Made smart passing decisions.
• Helped defend multiple positions.

These contributions rarely dominate headlines, yet they often determine winning basketball.

CJ McCollum’s Offensive Spark

Atlanta struggled offensively for much of the evening, but CJ McCollum provided consistent scoring.

His 23 points came through confidence and experience.

He attacked:

• Mid range opportunities.
• Perimeter jump shots.
• Transition situations.

Despite Houston’s defensive pressure, McCollum remained Atlanta’s most reliable offensive option.

Nickeil Alexander Walker Continues His Strong Form

Alexander Walker added 20 points and displayed impressive scoring versatility.

His performance included:

• Driving finishes
• Outside shooting
• Transition baskets

Although Atlanta lost comfortably, his offensive production remained one of the team’s brightest positives.

Dyson Daniels as Primary Playmaker

Every successful offense requires someone capable of creating opportunities.

Daniels filled that role.

His seven assists reflected:

• Court vision
• Passing accuracy
• Decision making
• Offensive organization

Unfortunately for Atlanta, several quality passes resulted in missed shots rather than assists because Houston defended exceptionally well around the basket.

Statistical Comparison by Category

Offensive Production

Category	Houston	Atlanta
Points	104	86
Assists	23	19
Field Goal Percentage	42%	37%
Three Point Percentage	39%	31%

Houston generated more efficient offense despite facing a similar number of possessions.

Defensive Production

Category	Houston	Atlanta
Rebounds	59	46
Steals	8	7
Blocks	14	5
Turnovers Forced	12	11

The defensive numbers explain why Atlanta scored only 86 points.

Houston consistently:

• Protected the rim.
• Finished defensive possessions with rebounds.
• Limited easy transition baskets.
• Forced difficult shot selection.

Coaching Impact

Statistics often focus entirely on players, yet coaching decisions significantly influence games.

Houston adjusted exceptionally well after halftime.

Several noticeable changes included:

Increased Defensive Pressure

Houston closed passing lanes more aggressively during the third quarter.

Atlanta struggled to establish offensive rhythm once those adjustments took effect.

Better Transition Defense

Fast break opportunities became increasingly rare for Atlanta.

Houston’s defensive balance prevented easy baskets.

More Interior Attacks

Rather than relying entirely on perimeter shooting, Houston attacked inside more frequently after halftime.

That strategy generated:

• Higher quality shots
• More rebounds
• Additional free throw opportunities

Momentum Shift During the Third Quarter

The third quarter deserves special attention because it effectively decided the game.

Quarter score:

Houston 35

Atlanta 24

Houston outscored Atlanta by 11 points in just one quarter.

Several factors contributed.

Defensive Stops

Houston forced consecutive empty possessions.

Efficient Transition Offense

Quick defensive rebounds led directly to fast scoring opportunities.

Kevin Durant’s Scoring Burst

Durant elevated his offensive aggression during this stretch while continuing to take efficient shots.

Interior Dominance

Atlanta struggled to finish around Houston’s rim protectors.

Team Shooting Analysis

Raw percentages only tell part of the story.

Houston attempted:

• 92 field goals

Atlanta attempted:

• 93 field goals

The shot volume remained nearly identical.

However, Houston converted five additional field goals despite taking one fewer attempt.

That efficiency difference became decisive.

What Atlanta Did Well

Despite the loss, several positives emerged.

Free Throw Shooting

Atlanta converted:

• 86 percent

Although the Hawks reached the line only seven times, they capitalized when opportunities arrived.

Ball Security

Atlanta committed only:

• 12 turnovers

Against an aggressive Houston defense, that number remained respectable.

Balanced Rebounding

Three different players collected seven rebounds.

While no individual dominated the glass, multiple contributors helped prevent an even larger rebounding deficit.

Areas Houston Can Still Improve

Winning teams continue searching for improvement.

Houston’s performance highlighted several areas worth monitoring.

Free Throw Percentage

Houston shot:

• 70 percent

Improving this area could become important in closer games later in the season.

Early Offensive Rhythm

The Rockets scored only 43 points during the first half.

Their offense improved dramatically after halftime.

Finding that rhythm earlier would create even stronger performances.

Bench Scoring Consistency

Although Houston’s reserves defended well, additional offensive production from the second unit would reduce pressure on the starters during demanding stretches of the regular season.

Areas Atlanta Must Improve

This game highlighted several priorities moving forward.

Interior Defense

Allowing 59 rebounds and 14 blocked shots indicates problems around the paint.

Improving physical defense inside should become an emphasis.

Offensive Efficiency

Atlanta finished at only 37 percent from the field.

Creating higher quality looks should improve overall scoring.

Three Point Accuracy

The Hawks attempted 39 three pointers but converted only 31 percent.

More efficient shot selection could significantly increase offensive production without changing the overall game plan.

Season Impact of the Result

The houston rockets vs atlanta hawks match player stats also provide valuable context for how this game fit into the broader 2025 to 26 NBA season.

Houston entered the contest with a 29 and 17 record and continued to strengthen its position among the top teams in the Western Conference. The Rockets demonstrated that they could win on the road through disciplined defense and balanced team basketball rather than relying solely on individual scoring.

Atlanta came into the game at 24 and 26, looking to improve its standing in the Eastern Conference. While the loss was disappointing, there were still encouraging individual performances that the coaching staff could build upon during the remainder of the season.

By the end of the season, Houston finished 52 and 30, placing second in the Southwest Division, while Atlanta completed the year at 46 and 36, finishing first in the Southeast Division. Those final standings show that both teams remained competitive throughout the season despite the result of this matchup.

Complete Team Statistics

Statistic	Houston Rockets	Atlanta Hawks
Final Score	104	86
Field Goals	39 of 92	34 of 93
Field Goal Percentage	42%	37%
Three Pointers	12 of 31	12 of 39
Three Point Percentage	39%	31%
Free Throws	14 of 20	6 of 7
Free Throw Percentage	70%	86%
Total Rebounds	59	46
Assists	23	19
Turnovers	11	12
Steals	8	7
Blocks	14	5

These figures illustrate a consistent pattern.

Houston led in almost every major category that influences winning basketball:

• Better shooting efficiency
• More rebounds
• More assists
• More blocked shots
• Fewer wasted possessions
• Better second half execution

Atlanta’s strongest statistical category was free throw percentage, but the limited number of attempts reduced its overall impact.

Key Individual Performances

Houston Rockets

Player	Performance
Kevin Durant	31 points
Alperen Sengun	13 rebounds
Amen Thompson	5 assists

Kevin Durant delivered the game’s standout offensive performance. His scoring came at critical moments, particularly during the third quarter when Houston created separation.

Alperen Sengun controlled the paint with his rebounding, while Amen Thompson ensured the offense remained organized throughout the game.

Atlanta Hawks

Player	Performance
CJ McCollum	23 points
Nickeil Alexander Walker	20 points
Dyson Daniels	7 assists
Christian Koloko	7 rebounds
Asa Newell	7 rebounds
Luke Kennard	7 rebounds

Atlanta received quality offensive production from McCollum and Alexander Walker, but the lack of additional scoring support made it difficult to keep pace with Houston.

Biggest Turning Points

Several moments shaped the outcome.

Houston’s Third Quarter Run

The Rockets outscored Atlanta 35 to 24 after halftime.

This stretch completely shifted momentum and allowed Houston to build a lead that Atlanta never seriously threatened.

Defensive Dominance

Recording 14 blocked shots changed Atlanta’s offensive approach.

Players became more hesitant near the basket, leading to lower percentage jump shots and reduced offensive efficiency.

Rebounding Margin

Winning the rebound battle by 13 boards gave Houston additional possessions while limiting Atlanta’s opportunities.

Extra possessions often become the deciding factor in NBA games, and this matchup was no exception.

Kevin Durant’s Offensive Leadership

Every time Atlanta attempted to reduce the deficit, Durant responded with timely scoring.

His experience and composure prevented Houston from losing momentum.

What Fans Can Learn from This Match

Basketball games are often judged by the final score, but statistics provide a much deeper understanding of why a team wins.

This matchup reinforces several important lessons.

Defense Creates Offense

Houston’s blocked shots and rebounds frequently led to transition opportunities.

Strong defense generated easier scoring chances.

Team Basketball Matters

Although Durant scored 31 points, Houston’s victory depended on contributions throughout the lineup.

Rebounding, passing, defense, and role players all played meaningful roles.

Efficiency Is More Important Than Volume

Atlanta attempted nearly the same number of shots as Houston.

The difference came from making a higher percentage of those opportunities.

Efficient offense consistently outperforms simply taking more shots.

Winning the Paint Often Wins the Game

Houston dominated inside through rebounding and rim protection.

Even in an era focused on three point shooting, interior control remains essential for consistent success.

Looking Ahead

The next scheduled meeting between these teams was set for 21 March 2026, when Atlanta would travel to Houston.

Based on this game, Atlanta’s priorities for the rematch would likely include:

• Improving interior defense.
• Matching Houston’s physicality on the boards.
• Increasing field goal efficiency.
• Creating more balanced scoring beyond its top two scorers.

Houston, meanwhile, would aim to repeat the defensive intensity that produced such a convincing victory.

If both teams entered the rematch healthy, fans could expect another competitive contest with strategic adjustments from both coaching staffs.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who won the Houston Rockets vs Atlanta Hawks game on 30 January 2026?

The Houston Rockets defeated the Atlanta Hawks by a final score of 104 to 86 at State Farm Arena.

Who scored the most points in the game?

Kevin Durant led all scorers with 31 points for Houston. CJ McCollum paced Atlanta with 23 points.

Which player grabbed the most rebounds?

Alperen Sengun led the game with 13 rebounds, helping Houston dominate the boards.

Who recorded the most assists?

Dyson Daniels led all players with 7 assists for Atlanta, while Amen Thompson led Houston with 5 assists.

Which team shot better from three point range?

Houston shot 39 percent from beyond the arc, while Atlanta finished at 31 percent, giving the Rockets a clear advantage from long distance.

What was the biggest statistical difference in the game?

Houston’s rim protection and rebounding made the largest impact. The Rockets recorded 14 blocks compared to Atlanta’s 5 and outrebounded the Hawks 59 to 46.

Conclusion

The houston rockets vs atlanta hawks match player stats tell the story of a disciplined road victory built on defense, rebounding, and efficient offensive execution. Houston remained patient during a tightly contested first half before taking complete control after the break with an outstanding third quarter. Kevin Durant’s 31-point performance provided the offensive foundation, while Alperen Sengun’s rebounding and the team’s collective defensive effort ensured Atlanta never found consistent momentum.

For Atlanta, CJ McCollum and Nickeil Alexander Walker delivered encouraging scoring performances, but the Hawks were unable to overcome Houston’s superiority in rebounding, shot blocking, and shooting efficiency. The game serves as an excellent example of how balanced team play often outweighs individual scoring totals and highlights the importance of controlling possessions, protecting the paint, and executing consistently over all four quarters.