Charlotte Hornets vs Golden State Warriors Match Player Stats: Full Game Analysis

Charlotte Hornets vs Golden State Warriors Match Player Stats

The charlotte hornets vs golden state warriors match player stats provide a detailed look at how Golden State controlled a high-scoring NBA regular season matchup against Charlotte on January 18, 2026. The Warriors defeated the Hornets 136-116 at Chase Center in San Francisco, showing a major difference in shooting efficiency, ball movement, and overall offensive execution.

This game was more than just a scoreboard result. The numbers reveal how Golden State created advantages through accurate three-point shooting, better passing, and fewer mistakes, while Charlotte struggled to maintain defensive pressure despite strong individual performances from Brandon Miller and Kon Knueppel.

The matchup was part of the 2025-26 NBA regular season and marked the second meeting between these teams during the season. Golden State completed a 2-0 season series sweep after also winning the previous contest 132-125 on December 31, 2025.

For fans studying box scores, fantasy basketball players analyzing performances, and analysts looking beyond the final score, this breakdown explains the important numbers behind the Warriors’ victory and highlights the players who influenced the outcome.

Table of Contents

Game Overview: Warriors Take Control Against Hornets

The Golden State Warriors entered the game with a 24-19 record and a strong 16-6 home record, while the Charlotte Hornets arrived with a 15-27 overall record and an 8-15 mark on the road.

The game was played at Chase Center with an attendance of 18,064 fans. From the opening quarter, Golden State established control by scoring 39 points compared to Charlotte’s 28.

Charlotte showed offensive improvement in the second half, especially during the third quarter when the Hornets scored 37 points. However, Golden State continued to answer every challenge by producing efficient scoring possessions.

The final quarter reflected the Warriors’ control as they maintained their advantage and closed the game with a 24-22 scoring edge.

Final Score Breakdown

Team Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Final
Charlotte Hornets 28 29 37 22 116
Golden State Warriors 39 30 43 24 136

The biggest difference came from Golden State’s ability to generate quality offensive opportunities throughout all four quarters.

Charlotte Hornets vs Golden State Warriors Match Player Stats

Looking deeper into the player numbers explains why the Warriors were able to secure the victory.

Charlotte had several productive individual performances, but the team could not match Golden State’s overall offensive balance. The Hornets depended heavily on Brandon Miller’s scoring and playmaking, while Golden State received contributions from multiple players.

Charlotte Hornets Player Performance Analysis

Brandon Miller Leads Charlotte’s Offensive Attack

Brandon Miller was the most influential Hornets player during the game. He finished as Charlotte’s leading scorer with 28 points while also contributing 6 rebounds and 5 assists.

His stat line showed his importance in multiple areas:

  • Points: 28
  • Rebounds: 6
  • Assists: 5

Miller was not only responsible for creating scoring opportunities but also helped organize the offense. His ability to score while contributing as a passer allowed Charlotte to remain competitive despite Golden State’s offensive pressure.

The challenge for Charlotte was that Miller needed more consistent support from other players to overcome Golden State’s balanced attack.

Kon Knueppel Provides Strong Rebounding Presence

Kon Knueppel delivered one of Charlotte’s strongest all-around efforts. He led the team in rebounding with 11 boards while adding 24 points.

His performance helped Charlotte compete on the glass despite the Warriors’ ability to create efficient scoring chances.

Knueppel’s numbers:

  • Points: 24
  • Rebounds: 11

A double-double-level performance from Knueppel highlighted his ability to impact the game beyond scoring. His rebounding was especially important because Charlotte finished with 44 total rebounds compared to Golden State’s 41.

Charlotte Team Shooting Performance

The Hornets recorded:

  • Field goals: 43 of 94
  • Field goal percentage: 46%
  • Three-pointers: 16 of 44
  • Three-point percentage: 36%
  • Free throws: 14 of 17
  • Free throw percentage: 82%

Charlotte’s shooting numbers were respectable, especially from three-point range. The team converted 16 three-pointers, showing that the offense was capable of creating outside opportunities.

However, the problem was efficiency compared with Golden State. The Warriors shot at a much higher level from the field and from beyond the arc, allowing them to create separation.

Charlotte’s Ball Movement and Turnovers

The Hornets finished with:

  • 27 assists
  • 17 turnovers
  • 5 steals
  • 3 blocks

The 27 assists showed positive offensive movement, but 17 turnovers gave Golden State additional opportunities.

Against a team known for creating fast offensive possessions, turnovers can quickly become costly. Golden State converted mistakes into scoring chances and maintained pressure throughout the game.

Golden State Warriors Player Performance Analysis

The Warriors won because of team-wide offensive efficiency. Instead of relying on one player, Golden State received significant contributions from starters and bench players.

The team finished with:

  • 136 points
  • 51 made field goals on 93 attempts
  • 55% field goal shooting
  • 23 three-pointers on 52 attempts
  • 44% three-point shooting
  • 34 assists
  • 11 turnovers

These numbers explain the difference between the two teams. Golden State created more efficient shots while also moving the ball effectively.

De’Anthony Melton Delivers Game-Leading Performance

De’Anthony Melton was the Warriors’ top scorer, finishing with 24 points. He also contributed 6 rebounds and 3 assists.

His performance was one of the biggest factors behind Golden State’s offensive success.

Melton’s complete stat line:

  • Points: 24
  • Rebounds: 6
  • Assists: 3

His scoring helped the Warriors maintain momentum, especially when Charlotte attempted to close the gap during the second half.

Draymond Green Provides Leadership and Playmaking

Draymond Green recorded an important two-way performance.

His statistics:

  • Points: 20
  • Rebounds: 3
  • Assists: 6

Green’s impact went beyond scoring. His passing ability helped Golden State create open opportunities, and his experience helped control the pace of the game.

The Warriors recorded 34 assists overall, and Green’s playmaking was a major part of that offensive structure.

Stephen Curry’s Efficient Contribution

Stephen Curry finished the game with:

  • Points: 14
  • Rebounds: 3
  • Assists: 5

Although Curry was not Golden State’s leading scorer, his presence continued to influence defensive decisions. Opposing teams often adjust their defensive schemes because of Curry’s shooting ability, creating opportunities for teammates.

His five assists also showed his role as a creator rather than only a scorer.

Brandin Podziemski Controls the Offense

Brandin Podziemski played a key role as a secondary creator.

His numbers:

  • Points: 16
  • Rebounds: 6
  • Assists: 7

Podziemski led the Warriors in assists, showing his ability to manage possessions and create scoring chances for teammates.

His balanced performance helped Golden State maintain offensive consistency throughout the game.

Warriors Supporting Players Make the Difference

Golden State received valuable production from several players.

Buddy Hield

Buddy Hield contributed:

  • 14 points
  • 3 rebounds
  • 1 assist

His shooting ability added another outside threat and helped stretch Charlotte’s defense.

Moses Moody

Moses Moody recorded:

  • 12 points
  • 1 rebound
  • 2 assists

His scoring contribution strengthened the Warriors’ rotation and provided additional offensive depth.

The combined effort from multiple players made it difficult for Charlotte to focus defensive attention on one specific threat.

Team Statistical Comparison: Why Golden State Won

The charlotte hornets vs golden state warriors match player stats become more meaningful when comparing team-level numbers. Individual performances explain who scored the points, but team statistics reveal how the game was actually decided.

Golden State’s victory was built on three major advantages:

  1. Better shooting efficiency
  2. Stronger ball movement
  3. Fewer costly turnovers

Charlotte produced a competitive offensive performance, scoring 116 points, but Golden State reached 136 points because the Warriors converted possessions at a much higher rate.

Shooting Efficiency Comparison

Shooting was the biggest statistical difference between the two teams.

Category Charlotte Hornets Golden State Warriors
Field Goals 43-94 51-93
Field Goal Percentage 46% 55%
Three-Pointers 16-44 23-52
Three-Point Percentage 36% 44%
Free Throws 14-17 11-13
Free Throw Percentage 82% 85%

Charlotte actually had a strong free throw performance, converting 82% of attempts. However, Golden State created a significant advantage through field goal and three-point efficiency.

The Warriors made eight more field goals and seven more three-pointers than Charlotte. In a high-scoring NBA game, those extra made shots create a major scoring gap.

Golden State’s 44% three-point shooting was especially important because the team attempted 52 shots from behind the arc. The Warriors combined volume with accuracy, which created constant pressure on Charlotte’s defense.

Rebounding Battle: Charlotte Competes Inside

Rebounding was one area where Charlotte remained competitive.

Team rebounding numbers:

  • Charlotte Hornets: 44 rebounds
  • Golden State Warriors: 41 rebounds

Despite losing the game, the Hornets actually collected three more rebounds.

Kon Knueppel’s 11 rebounds played an important role in keeping Charlotte competitive. His effort helped prevent Golden State from dominating second-chance opportunities.

However, rebounding alone could not overcome the shooting difference. Golden State’s efficiency allowed them to score more points with fewer wasted possessions.

Assists and Ball Movement Analysis

Passing was another major factor.

Category Charlotte Hornets Golden State Warriors
Assists 27 34
Turnovers 17 11

The Warriors created seven more assists while committing six fewer turnovers.

This difference shows a major contrast in offensive execution. Golden State consistently created open looks through movement and passing, while Charlotte had more possessions interrupted by mistakes.

The Warriors’ 34 assists reflected a team-focused approach. Brandin Podziemski led the team with 7 assists, while Draymond Green added 6 and Stephen Curry contributed 5.

Defensive Statistics Comparison

Defense also played a role in separating the teams.

Category Charlotte Hornets Golden State Warriors
Steals 5 8
Blocks 3 7

Golden State recorded more steals and blocks, showing stronger defensive activity.

The Warriors’ ability to force turnovers helped create additional scoring opportunities. In a game where both teams scored over 100 points, defensive plays that changed possession became extremely valuable.

Key Turning Points of the Game

First Quarter: Warriors Establish Early Control

The opening quarter shaped the entire matchup.

Golden State scored 39 points while limiting Charlotte to 28. The 11-point advantage gave the Warriors confidence and allowed them to control the pace.

Starting strong was important because Charlotte was forced to play from behind for most of the game.

Third Quarter: Charlotte Shows Fight But Warriors Respond

The third quarter was Charlotte’s strongest offensive period.

The Hornets scored 37 points, showing they could compete offensively against Golden State.

However, the Warriors answered with 43 points in the same quarter.

This was the moment where Golden State prevented a possible comeback. Instead of allowing Charlotte to gain momentum, the Warriors increased their offensive pressure.

Fourth Quarter: Golden State Maintains the Lead

The final quarter was about controlling the advantage.

Golden State scored 24 points while Charlotte managed 22.

The Warriors did not need an explosive final period because their earlier offensive efficiency created enough separation.

Tactical Breakdown: How Golden State Created Advantages

Spacing and Three-Point Volume

Golden State’s offensive identity has traditionally involved creating space through shooting. This game followed that approach.

The Warriors attempted 52 three-pointers and made 23 of them.

By forcing Charlotte’s defenders to cover the perimeter, Golden State created driving lanes and passing opportunities.

This approach also explains why multiple Warriors players produced strong numbers. When defenses focus on stopping one area of the floor, other players often benefit.

Multiple Scoring Options

One important lesson from this matchup is that Golden State did not rely on a single scorer.

The leading scorer was De’Anthony Melton with 24 points, but the team also received:

  • Draymond Green: 20 points
  • Brandin Podziemski: 16 points
  • Stephen Curry: 14 points
  • Buddy Hield: 14 points
  • Moses Moody: 12 points

This balanced scoring approach made defensive planning difficult for Charlotte.

Charlotte’s Offensive Challenge

The Hornets had strong individual performances, but their offense depended heavily on key players producing consistently.

Brandon Miller and Kon Knueppel combined for 52 points, showing their offensive importance.

However, Golden State’s balanced scoring meant Charlotte needed a stronger overall team performance to stay close.

Players Who Changed the Game

Most Valuable Charlotte Player: Brandon Miller

Brandon Miller’s 28-point performance was the highlight for Charlotte.

His ability to score, rebound, and create assists demonstrated his importance as a complete offensive player.

His five assists also showed that he was not simply looking for his own shot. He contributed to team creation.

Most Valuable Golden State Player: De’Anthony Melton

De’Anthony Melton’s 24 points made him the game’s leading scorer.

His scoring output combined with rebounding and playmaking gave Golden State a complete performance.

The Warriors needed contributions from different areas, and Melton delivered when the team required offensive production.

Fantasy Basketball Insights From the Match

For fantasy basketball analysis, this game offered several important takeaways.

Strong Fantasy Performances

Players with the biggest statistical impact included:

Brandon Miller

  • 28 points
  • 6 rebounds
  • 5 assists

His combination of scoring and playmaking provided value across multiple categories.

Kon Knueppel

  • 24 points
  • 11 rebounds

His rebounding production increased his overall fantasy value.

Brandin Podziemski

  • 16 points
  • 6 rebounds
  • 7 assists

His near triple-double performance showed strong all-around production.

Draymond Green

  • 20 points
  • 3 rebounds
  • 6 assists

Green’s assists and scoring made him an important contributor.

What This Match Reveals About Both Teams

This matchup showed two teams with different offensive styles.

Charlotte demonstrated the ability to score effectively but struggled to match Golden State’s efficiency.

Golden State showed why team depth matters. Even when Stephen Curry was not the highest scorer, the Warriors had enough offensive options to dominate.

The result also reflected the season series outcome. Golden State defeated Charlotte twice during the 2025-26 regular season, winning both meetings.

Common Questions About Charlotte Hornets vs Golden State Warriors Match Player Stats

Who was the top scorer in the Charlotte Hornets vs Golden State Warriors game?

De’Anthony Melton was the leading scorer for the Golden State Warriors with 24 points, while Brandon Miller led the Charlotte Hornets with 28 points.

How many points did Stephen Curry score against the Hornets?

Stephen Curry scored 14 points while adding 3 rebounds and 5 assists.

Which player recorded the most rebounds in the game?

Kon Knueppel led all players with 11 rebounds for the Charlotte Hornets.

Did the Warriors win the season series against the Hornets?

Yes, Golden State won the season series 2-0 against Charlotte during the 2025-26 NBA regular season.

What was the biggest difference between the two teams?

The biggest difference was shooting efficiency. Golden State shot 55% from the field and 44% from three-point range, while Charlotte shot 46% overall and 36% from three.

How many assists did Golden State record?

The Warriors finished with 34 assists, seven more than Charlotte’s 27 assists.

Conclusion

The charlotte hornets vs golden state warriors match player stats show a clear example of how efficiency and teamwork can decide an NBA game. Golden State’s 136-116 victory was not based on one outstanding performance alone. Instead, the Warriors succeeded because several players contributed in important areas.

De’Anthony Melton led the scoring with 24 points, while Draymond Green, Brandin Podziemski, Stephen Curry, Buddy Hield, and Moses Moody all added valuable production. This balanced attack allowed Golden State to maintain offensive pressure throughout the game.

For Charlotte, Brandon Miller delivered an impressive performance with 28 points, 6 rebounds, and 5 assists, while Kon Knueppel provided strong interior support with 24 points and 11 rebounds. However, the Hornets could not match Golden State’s shooting accuracy, ball movement, and ability to protect possessions.

The statistical story of the matchup was clear. Golden State made more shots, created more assists, committed fewer turnovers, and converted opportunities at a higher level. Charlotte competed in several areas, especially rebounding, but the Warriors’ offensive execution created the separation needed for victory.

This game also highlighted an important basketball lesson: individual performances matter, but team efficiency often determines the final result. The Warriors’ ability to receive contributions from multiple players proved to be the difference in completing a 2-0 season sweep over the Hornets.

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *