Golden State Warriors vs San Antonio Spurs Match Player Stats
The golden state warriors vs san antonio spurs match player stats provide a detailed picture of how the San Antonio Spurs secured a 126-113 victory over the Golden State Warriors on February 12, 2026. The game was played at Chase Center in San Francisco, where 18,064 fans watched the Spurs overcome a strong Warriors start and control the second half with balanced scoring, efficient shooting, and improved defensive execution.
This matchup was more than just a regular-season result. It showed the difference between a team relying on early momentum and a team maintaining consistency across four quarters. The Warriors entered the game with a 29-26 record and a strong home record, while the Spurs arrived with a 38-16 record and confidence built from one of the better campaigns in the Western Conference.
San Antonio finished the night with 126 points by combining efficient inside scoring, strong ball movement, and reliable free-throw shooting. Golden State had a competitive first half and even led 67-63 at halftime, but the Spurs responded after the break and limited the Warriors to only 46 points in the second half.
The final score did not tell the entire story. The game included several important individual performances, including De’Aaron Fox leading the Spurs with 27 points and Victor Wembanyama adding 26 points. For Golden State, Draymond Green, De’Anthony Melton, and Moses Moody each scored 17 points, but the Warriors struggled to maintain offensive rhythm late in the game.
This complete breakdown examines the numbers behind the contest, including scoring leaders, shooting efficiency, rebounding battles, playmaking, defensive impact, and the factors that decided the outcome.
Match Overview: Spurs Take Control After Competitive First Half
The February 12, 2026 meeting between the Spurs and Warriors was part of the NBA regular season schedule. The Spurs entered the contest with a 38-16 record, including a strong 19-10 mark on the road. The Warriors had a 29-26 record before the game and had performed well at home with an 18-10 record.
San Antonio’s ability to win away from home was tested immediately because Golden State started aggressively. The Warriors scored 38 points in the opening quarter, using perimeter shooting and fast offensive possessions to create an early advantage.
However, the Spurs did not allow the game to become one-sided.
San Antonio scored at least 31 points in every quarter:
- First quarter: 31 points
- Second quarter: 32 points
- Third quarter: 31 points
- Fourth quarter: 32 points
That consistency became one of the biggest differences between the two teams.
Golden State’s scoring pattern changed dramatically throughout the game:
- First quarter: 38 points
- Second quarter: 29 points
- Third quarter: 27 points
- Fourth quarter: 19 points
The fourth-quarter decline was the deciding factor. After entering halftime with a four-point lead, the Warriors could not match San Antonio’s offensive pressure in the final period.
Team Statistical Comparison
The overall numbers show a close game in several areas, but San Antonio created advantages in efficiency and physical play.
| Category | San Antonio Spurs | Golden State Warriors |
| Final Score | 126 | 113 |
| Field Goals | 46-93 (49%) | 42-91 (46%) |
| Three-Pointers | 10-39 (26%) | 16-47 (34%) |
| Free Throws | 24-28 (86%) | 13-17 (76%) |
| Total Rebounds | 44 | 40 |
| Assists | 35 | 37 |
| Turnovers | 9 | 11 |
| Steals | 6 | 6 |
| Blocks | 5 | 1 |
The numbers highlight an important basketball lesson. Golden State actually made more three-pointers, connecting on 16 attempts from beyond the arc compared with San Antonio’s 10. However, the Spurs compensated through better overall field-goal efficiency, stronger free-throw production, and more balanced scoring.
San Antonio attempted 28 free throws and converted 24, creating a significant advantage at the foul line. Golden State reached the free-throw line only 17 times and made 13.
That nine-point difference from free throws played a major role in a 13-point final margin.
San Antonio Spurs Player Performance Analysis
The Spurs won because multiple players contributed, but two stars controlled the offensive production.
De’Aaron Fox Leads Spurs Scoring Attack
De’Aaron Fox was the leading scorer for San Antonio with 27 points. His performance was important because he provided offensive creation throughout the game and helped the Spurs maintain pressure against Golden State’s defensive schemes.
Fox’s scoring impact came from his ability to attack different areas of the court. His quickness allowed him to create driving opportunities, while his ability to control pace helped San Antonio avoid long scoring droughts.
A major strength of Fox’s performance was timing. Whenever Golden State attempted to build momentum, Fox provided an answer through scoring or play creation.
His 27 points made him the top offensive contributor in the game.
Victor Wembanyama Provides Two-Way Impact
Victor Wembanyama finished with 26 points, nearly matching Fox’s production. His performance demonstrated why his presence changes the way opponents approach the game.
Wembanyama influenced the contest in several ways:
- 26 points scored
- Defensive presence around the rim
- Rebounding impact
- Ability to stretch the floor
San Antonio also recorded five blocks as a team, compared with only one from Golden State. While the box score does not assign every defensive disruption directly to one player, Wembanyama’s size and defensive awareness affected the Warriors’ shot selection.
His ability to impact both offense and defense gave the Spurs an advantage during the second half.
Supporting Cast Helps Complete Spurs Victory
San Antonio did not depend only on its top two scorers. The team received contributions from several players, creating a balanced offensive approach.
The Spurs lineup included:
- Julian Champagnie
- Victor Wembanyama
- De’Aaron Fox
- Devin Vassell
- Stephon Castle
The bench featured experienced contributors and developing players:
- Harrison Barnes
- Keldon Johnson
- Carter Bryant
- Luke Kornet
- Dylan Harper
- Kelly Olynyk
- Bismack Biyombo
- Jordan McLaughlin
Although some bench players did not appear in the final box score due to coach decisions, the overall roster depth helped San Antonio maintain energy throughout the game.
Golden State Warriors Player Performance Analysis
Golden State showed strong offensive ability early but struggled to maintain efficiency during the final stages of the matchup.
Balanced Scoring Without a Single Dominant Leader
The Warriors’ top scoring performance was shared among three players.
Draymond Green, De’Anthony Melton, and Moses Moody each scored 17 points.
This scoring distribution showed that Golden State had multiple offensive options, but it also highlighted the absence of a single player taking control during important stretches.
Brandin Podziemski followed with 16 points, providing valuable bench scoring.
The Warriors roster included:
Starters:
- Draymond Green
- Gui Santos
- De’Anthony Melton
- Moses Moody
- Pat Spencer
Bench players:
- Al Horford
- Quinten Post
- Gary Payton II
- Brandin Podziemski
- Kristaps Porzingis
- Will Richard
The Warriors had offensive opportunities throughout the game, but their fourth-quarter performance became the biggest issue.
Draymond Green’s Leadership Role
Draymond Green scored 17 points and remained one of Golden State’s key contributors. His influence extends beyond scoring because he impacts defense, communication, and ball movement.
Golden State finished with 37 assists, two more than San Antonio’s 35. This showed that the Warriors were still capable of creating quality offensive opportunities.
However, the team needed more consistent shot-making in the final quarter.
Bench Contributions and Availability Issues
Golden State entered the game without Kristaps Porzingis, who was unavailable because of a left Achilles tendon issue. Will Richard also missed the game because of a right knee contusion.
Those absences affected the team’s rotation options.
When facing a long and athletic Spurs lineup, having additional size and scoring depth can become especially valuable. San Antonio used its available players effectively, while Golden State had fewer answers late in the game.
Quarter-by-Quarter Breakdown: How Spurs Changed the Game
The golden state warriors vs san antonio spurs match player stats become more meaningful when the game is viewed quarter by quarter. The final score of 126-113 suggests a comfortable Spurs victory, but the contest was highly competitive for the first two periods.
Golden State started with strong offensive execution, but San Antonio’s consistency across the final three quarters eventually created separation.
First Quarter: Warriors Start Fast With Offensive Energy
The Warriors opened the game with confidence and scored 38 points in the first quarter. Their early success came from aggressive shooting and quick offensive possessions.
Golden State created advantages by:
- Moving the ball quickly
- Taking a high number of three-point attempts
- Attacking before the Spurs defense was fully organized
San Antonio scored 31 points in the opening period, which kept the game within reach. Although the Warriors had the better start, the Spurs showed they could match the offensive pace.
The first quarter highlighted Golden State’s ability to score efficiently when shots were falling. However, the challenge was maintaining that level throughout the entire game.
Second Quarter: Spurs Recover Before Halftime
The second quarter was much closer, with San Antonio scoring 32 points and Golden State adding 29.
At halftime, the Warriors held a 67-63 advantage.
Despite trailing on the scoreboard, the Spurs had several positive indicators:
- Better overall shooting efficiency
- Stronger interior presence
- More consistent offensive possessions
The Spurs did not allow Golden State to build a large lead, which became important later. Keeping the deficit small gave them an opportunity to take control after halftime.
Third Quarter: Spurs Begin Taking Control
The third quarter represented the turning point of the game.
San Antonio scored 31 points, while Golden State managed 27.
The Spurs improved defensively and forced the Warriors into more difficult possessions. Their ability to limit easy scoring chances changed the flow of the matchup.
Several statistical areas helped San Antonio:
- Better field-goal percentage
- More free-throw opportunities
- Stronger rebounding advantage
The Spurs entered the fourth quarter with momentum and confidence.
Fourth Quarter: San Antonio Finishes Strong
The final period decided the game.
San Antonio scored 32 points, while Golden State scored only 19.
A 13-point difference in the fourth quarter turned a competitive game into a Spurs victory.
The Warriors struggled with:
- Reduced scoring efficiency
- Fewer successful offensive possessions
- Difficulty stopping San Antonio’s scoring options
The Spurs remained aggressive and closed the game with the same consistency they showed throughout the night.
Key Statistical Factors Behind the Spurs Victory
Several numbers explain why San Antonio won despite Golden State making more three-pointers.
1. Field Goal Efficiency Advantage
San Antonio made 46 of 93 field-goal attempts, finishing at 49%.
Golden State made 42 of 91 attempts, finishing at 46%.
The difference may appear small, but across nearly 100 shot attempts, a three-percentage-point advantage creates meaningful extra scoring opportunities.
The Spurs were more efficient from the field and converted their opportunities more consistently.
2. Free Throw Difference Changed the Score
One of the clearest advantages came from the free-throw line.
San Antonio:
- Attempts: 28
- Made: 24
- Percentage: 86%
Golden State:
- Attempts: 17
- Made: 13
- Percentage: 76%
The Spurs scored 11 more points from free throws.
In a competitive NBA game, this type of advantage can completely change the final result.
San Antonio’s ability to attack the basket and earn fouls helped balance Golden State’s advantage from three-point shooting.
3. Rebounding Battle Favored San Antonio
The Spurs won the rebounding battle 44-40.
Four additional rebounds may not look significant, but extra possessions often decide close games.
San Antonio’s rebounding advantages helped them:
- Create second-chance opportunities
- Limit Warriors offensive rebounds
- Control late-game possessions
The presence of Victor Wembanyama was especially important because his size changed how Golden State approached shots near the basket.
4. Ball Movement Was Strong From Both Teams
Both teams displayed effective passing.
San Antonio recorded:
- 35 assists
Golden State recorded:
- 37 assists
The Warriors actually finished with more assists, showing that their offensive structure was still functioning.
However, assists alone do not guarantee offensive success. The difference came from finishing opportunities and maintaining scoring efficiency.
Offensive Strategy Comparison
Spurs Offensive Approach
San Antonio’s offense focused on balance.
Instead of relying on one scorer, the Spurs used multiple options:
- De’Aaron Fox creating pressure
- Victor Wembanyama providing inside and outside scoring
- Supporting players contributing when opportunities appeared
This approach made it difficult for Golden State to focus defensive attention on only one player.
The Spurs scored 126 points while shooting 49% from the field, showing that their offensive execution remained effective throughout the game.
Warriors Offensive Approach
Golden State relied heavily on perimeter shooting.
The Warriors attempted 47 three-pointers and made 16.
Their 34% three-point shooting was better than San Antonio’s 26%, but the team could not convert that advantage into a win.
The main issue was consistency.
A team can survive missed shots when defensive pressure remains strong, but Golden State allowed San Antonio to maintain offensive rhythm during the second half.
Defensive Comparison: Spurs Create More Problems
Defense was one of the biggest differences between the two teams.
San Antonio recorded:
- 5 blocks
- 6 steals
Golden State recorded:
- 1 block
- 6 steals
The Spurs created more resistance around the basket and made scoring inside more difficult.
Their defensive activity helped limit the Warriors during the fourth quarter.
Golden State’s defense was effective in some areas, but the team struggled to slow down San Antonio’s main scoring threats.
The Impact of Victor Wembanyama’s Presence
Victor Wembanyama’s influence goes beyond traditional box score statistics.
His 26 points were important, but his impact was also visible in how Golden State adjusted its offense.
Players with exceptional size can affect games through:
- Shot contests
- Defensive positioning
- Rebounding opportunities
- Offensive spacing
The Spurs’ five team blocks compared with Golden State’s one block showed a major difference in interior defensive impact.
Wembanyama helped San Antonio control the paint while also contributing as a scorer.
De’Aaron Fox Controls the Pace
De’Aaron Fox’s 27-point performance was another major reason behind the Spurs victory.
His role was not only scoring. He helped manage the game’s tempo.
Against a Warriors team known for quick offensive sequences, controlling pace becomes extremely valuable.
Fox provided:
- Reliable scoring
- Fast transition opportunities
- Offensive decision-making
His performance allowed San Antonio to stay composed when Golden State created early pressure.
What the Player Stats Reveal About Both Teams
The golden state warriors vs san antonio spurs match player stats show two teams with different strengths.
San Antonio’s advantages:
- Better field-goal percentage
- More free throws
- More rebounds
- Better interior defense
- More consistent scoring
Golden State’s advantages:
- More three-point makes
- Slightly more assists
- Strong first-quarter offense
The result came down to consistency. The Warriors had strong moments, but the Spurs maintained their level throughout all four quarters.
Important Rotation Notes
Availability played an important role in the matchup.
San Antonio listed several players who did not enter the game:
- Bismack Biyombo
- Jordan McLaughlin
- Kelly Olynyk
All were listed as coach’s decisions.
Golden State also had two unavailable players:
- Kristaps Porzingis due to left Achilles tendon issue
- Will Richard due to right knee contusion
Missing rotation options can influence defensive matchups, rebounding depth, and late-game adjustments.
Season Series Context
Before this matchup, Golden State led the season series 2-1.
Previous meetings included:
- Game 1: Golden State 125-120 San Antonio
- Game 2: San Antonio 109-108 Golden State
- Game 3: San Antonio 126-113 Golden State
- Game 4: San Antonio 127-113 Golden State
The February 12 game added another important chapter to the rivalry between the two Western Conference teams.
The result showed that San Antonio had the ability to compete with Golden State’s shooting-based style by using efficiency, size, and balanced scoring.
Quarter-by-Quarter Breakdown: How Spurs Changed the Game
The golden state warriors vs san antonio spurs match player stats become more meaningful when the game is viewed quarter by quarter. The final score of 126-113 suggests a comfortable Spurs victory, but the contest was highly competitive for the first two periods.
Golden State started with strong offensive execution, but San Antonio’s consistency across the final three quarters eventually created separation.
First Quarter: Warriors Start Fast With Offensive Energy
The Warriors opened the game with confidence and scored 38 points in the first quarter. Their early success came from aggressive shooting and quick offensive possessions.
Golden State created advantages by:
- Moving the ball quickly
- Taking a high number of three-point attempts
- Attacking before the Spurs defense was fully organized
San Antonio scored 31 points in the opening period, which kept the game within reach. Although the Warriors had the better start, the Spurs showed they could match the offensive pace.
The first quarter highlighted Golden State’s ability to score efficiently when shots were falling. However, the challenge was maintaining that level throughout the entire game.
Second Quarter: Spurs Recover Before Halftime
The second quarter was much closer, with San Antonio scoring 32 points and Golden State adding 29.
At halftime, the Warriors held a 67-63 advantage.
Despite trailing on the scoreboard, the Spurs had several positive indicators:
- Better overall shooting efficiency
- Stronger interior presence
- More consistent offensive possessions
The Spurs did not allow Golden State to build a large lead, which became important later. Keeping the deficit small gave them an opportunity to take control after halftime.
Third Quarter: Spurs Begin Taking Control
The third quarter represented the turning point of the game.
San Antonio scored 31 points, while Golden State managed 27.
The Spurs improved defensively and forced the Warriors into more difficult possessions. Their ability to limit easy scoring chances changed the flow of the matchup.
Several statistical areas helped San Antonio:
- Better field-goal percentage
- More free-throw opportunities
- Stronger rebounding advantage
The Spurs entered the fourth quarter with momentum and confidence.
Fourth Quarter: San Antonio Finishes Strong
The final period decided the game.
San Antonio scored 32 points, while Golden State scored only 19.
A 13-point difference in the fourth quarter turned a competitive game into a Spurs victory.
The Warriors struggled with:
- Reduced scoring efficiency
- Fewer successful offensive possessions
- Difficulty stopping San Antonio’s scoring options
The Spurs remained aggressive and closed the game with the same consistency they showed throughout the night.
Key Statistical Factors Behind the Spurs Victory
Several numbers explain why San Antonio won despite Golden State making more three-pointers.
1. Field Goal Efficiency Advantage
San Antonio made 46 of 93 field-goal attempts, finishing at 49%.
Golden State made 42 of 91 attempts, finishing at 46%.
The difference may appear small, but across nearly 100 shot attempts, a three-percentage-point advantage creates meaningful extra scoring opportunities.
The Spurs were more efficient from the field and converted their opportunities more consistently.
2. Free Throw Difference Changed the Score
One of the clearest advantages came from the free-throw line.
San Antonio:
- Attempts: 28
- Made: 24
- Percentage: 86%
Golden State:
- Attempts: 17
- Made: 13
- Percentage: 76%
The Spurs scored 11 more points from free throws.
In a competitive NBA game, this type of advantage can completely change the final result.
San Antonio’s ability to attack the basket and earn fouls helped balance Golden State’s advantage from three-point shooting.
3. Rebounding Battle Favored San Antonio
The Spurs won the rebounding battle 44-40.
Four additional rebounds may not look significant, but extra possessions often decide close games.
San Antonio’s rebounding advantages helped them:
- Create second-chance opportunities
- Limit Warriors offensive rebounds
- Control late-game possessions
The presence of Victor Wembanyama was especially important because his size changed how Golden State approached shots near the basket.
4. Ball Movement Was Strong From Both Teams
Both teams displayed effective passing.
San Antonio recorded:
- 35 assists
Golden State recorded:
- 37 assists
The Warriors actually finished with more assists, showing that their offensive structure was still functioning.
However, assists alone do not guarantee offensive success. The difference came from finishing opportunities and maintaining scoring efficiency.
Offensive Strategy Comparison
Spurs Offensive Approach
San Antonio’s offense focused on balance.
Instead of relying on one scorer, the Spurs used multiple options:
- De’Aaron Fox creating pressure
- Victor Wembanyama providing inside and outside scoring
- Supporting players contributing when opportunities appeared
This approach made it difficult for Golden State to focus defensive attention on only one player.
The Spurs scored 126 points while shooting 49% from the field, showing that their offensive execution remained effective throughout the game.
Warriors Offensive Approach
Golden State relied heavily on perimeter shooting.
The Warriors attempted 47 three-pointers and made 16.
Their 34% three-point shooting was better than San Antonio’s 26%, but the team could not convert that advantage into a win.
The main issue was consistency.
A team can survive missed shots when defensive pressure remains strong, but Golden State allowed San Antonio to maintain offensive rhythm during the second half.
Defensive Comparison: Spurs Create More Problems
Defense was one of the biggest differences between the two teams.
San Antonio recorded:
- 5 blocks
- 6 steals
Golden State recorded:
- 1 block
- 6 steals
The Spurs created more resistance around the basket and made scoring inside more difficult.
Their defensive activity helped limit the Warriors during the fourth quarter.
Golden State’s defense was effective in some areas, but the team struggled to slow down San Antonio’s main scoring threats.
The Impact of Victor Wembanyama’s Presence
Victor Wembanyama’s influence goes beyond traditional box score statistics.
His 26 points were important, but his impact was also visible in how Golden State adjusted its offense.
Players with exceptional size can affect games through:
- Shot contests
- Defensive positioning
- Rebounding opportunities
- Offensive spacing
The Spurs’ five team blocks compared with Golden State’s one block showed a major difference in interior defensive impact.
Wembanyama helped San Antonio control the paint while also contributing as a scorer.
De’Aaron Fox Controls the Pace
De’Aaron Fox’s 27-point performance was another major reason behind the Spurs victory.
His role was not only scoring. He helped manage the game’s tempo.
Against a Warriors team known for quick offensive sequences, controlling pace becomes extremely valuable.
Fox provided:
- Reliable scoring
- Fast transition opportunities
- Offensive decision-making
His performance allowed San Antonio to stay composed when Golden State created early pressure.
What the Player Stats Reveal About Both Teams
The golden state warriors vs san antonio spurs match player stats show two teams with different strengths.
San Antonio’s advantages:
- Better field-goal percentage
- More free throws
- More rebounds
- Better interior defense
- More consistent scoring
Golden State’s advantages:
- More three-point makes
- Slightly more assists
- Strong first-quarter offense
The result came down to consistency. The Warriors had strong moments, but the Spurs maintained their level throughout all four quarters.
Important Rotation Notes
Availability played an important role in the matchup.
San Antonio listed several players who did not enter the game:
- Bismack Biyombo
- Jordan McLaughlin
- Kelly Olynyk
All were listed as coach’s decisions.
Golden State also had two unavailable players:
- Kristaps Porzingis due to left Achilles tendon issue
- Will Richard due to right knee contusion
Missing rotation options can influence defensive matchups, rebounding depth, and late-game adjustments.
Season Series Context
Before this matchup, Golden State led the season series 2-1.
Previous meetings included:
- Game 1: Golden State 125-120 San Antonio
- Game 2: San Antonio 109-108 Golden State
- Game 3: San Antonio 126-113 Golden State
- Game 4: San Antonio 127-113 Golden State
The February 12 game added another important chapter to the rivalry between the two Western Conference teams.
The result showed that San Antonio had the ability to compete with Golden State’s shooting-based style by using efficiency, size, and balanced scoring.
Frequently Asked Questions About Golden State Warriors vs San Antonio Spurs Match Player Stats
What was the final score between the Spurs and Warriors on February 12, 2026?
The San Antonio Spurs defeated the Golden State Warriors 126-113 at Chase Center in San Francisco. The Warriors led 67-63 at halftime, but the Spurs outscored them in the second half and secured the win.
Who was the leading scorer in the Spurs vs Warriors game?
De’Aaron Fox was the leading scorer for the San Antonio Spurs with 27 points. Victor Wembanyama followed closely with 26 points. For the Warriors, Draymond Green, De’Anthony Melton, and Moses Moody led the team with 17 points each.
Which team had better shooting numbers in the game?
The Spurs had better overall shooting efficiency. San Antonio made 46 of 93 field-goal attempts for 49%, while Golden State made 42 of 91 attempts for 46%.
The Warriors had the advantage from three-point range, making 16 three-pointers compared with San Antonio’s 10, but the Spurs were more efficient overall.
Why did the Spurs beat the Warriors despite making fewer three-pointers?
The Spurs won because they performed better in several other areas. They had advantages in field-goal percentage, free throws, and rebounding.
San Antonio scored 24 points from free throws compared with Golden State’s 13, creating an important scoring advantage. The Spurs also controlled the rebound battle 44-40.
How did Victor Wembanyama perform against the Warriors?
Victor Wembanyama scored 26 points and provided a major defensive presence for San Antonio. The Spurs finished with five blocks as a team, and his size helped influence Golden State’s shot selection around the basket.
What was the biggest difference between the two teams?
The biggest difference was fourth-quarter performance. The Spurs scored 32 points in the final quarter, while the Warriors scored only 19. San Antonio maintained offensive consistency throughout the game, while Golden State struggled to keep pace late.
Conclusion
The golden state warriors vs san antonio spurs match player stats show a game decided by balance, efficiency, and execution rather than one single factor.
San Antonio’s victory was built on several strong areas. De’Aaron Fox and Victor Wembanyama provided elite scoring, while the team as a whole maintained offensive pressure throughout all four quarters. The Spurs shot more efficiently, earned more free throws, controlled the rebounding battle, and limited Golden State’s ability to create a late comeback.
Golden State showed why they remain a dangerous offensive team. They made more three-pointers, recorded 37 assists, and started the game with impressive energy. However, their fourth-quarter struggles prevented them from converting those strengths into a win.
The matchup also highlighted the importance of complete team performance in the NBA. Three-point shooting, star scoring, defensive pressure, and possession control all played a role in determining the final result.
For fans analyzing NBA games, this contest is a strong example of why box scores tell only part of the story. The deeper numbers reveal how teams create advantages, protect leads, and perform under pressure.
