Minnesota Vikings vs Seahawks Match Player Stats
The Minnesota Vikings vs Seahawks match player stats tell the story of a game where defense completely dictated the outcome. On December 1, 2025, the Seattle Seahawks earned an impressive 26 to 0 victory over the Minnesota Vikings in front of their home crowd. While the final score alone highlights Seattle’s dominance, the player statistics reveal exactly how the Seahawks controlled every phase of the contest.
Rather than relying on explosive offensive production, Seattle won through disciplined defense, timely rushing, excellent special teams, and mistake free football. Minnesota, meanwhile, struggled to establish any offensive rhythm. Four interceptions, constant defensive pressure, and poor field position prevented the Vikings from finding momentum throughout all four quarters.
This article breaks down every important statistic from the matchup, explains what each number means, evaluates the performances of key players, and provides a complete analysis of how Seattle secured one of its most convincing victories of the 2025 NFL season.
Match Overview
| Game Detail | Information |
| Competition | NFL |
| Date | December 1, 2025 |
| Venue | Seattle Seahawks Home Stadium |
| Final Score | Seattle Seahawks 26, Minnesota Vikings 0 |
| Minnesota Record | 4 to 8 |
| Seattle Record | 9 to 3 |
Quarter by quarter, Seattle slowly increased its advantage instead of relying on one explosive period.
| Quarter | Vikings | Seahawks |
| First | 0 | 0 |
| Second | 0 | 13 |
| Third | 0 | 6 |
| Fourth | 0 | 7 |
| Final | 0 | 26 |
The opening quarter featured strong defensive play from both teams. However, Seattle gradually wore down Minnesota’s offense before taking complete control during the second half.
Minnesota Vikings vs Seahawks Match Player Stats Breakdown
Looking deeper into the Minnesota Vikings vs Seahawks match player stats, one trend becomes immediately obvious.
Seattle did not overwhelm Minnesota with huge offensive numbers. Instead, they consistently won the field position battle, avoided costly turnovers through the air, capitalized on Minnesota’s mistakes, and converted defensive opportunities into points.
Several statistical categories explain why the game became so one sided.
- Four Seattle interceptions
- One defensive touchdown
- Four sacks by each defense
- Seattle’s balanced rushing attack
- Jason Myers scoring 14 total points
- Minnesota finishing without a single point
The numbers illustrate that complementary football often wins games more effectively than flashy offensive performances.
Quarterback Performance Analysis
Quarterbacks naturally receive the most attention, but this game demonstrated how quarterback efficiency can matter more than passing yardage.
Max Brosmer Struggles Against Seattle’s Defense
Minnesota quarterback Max Brosmer finished with:
| Statistic | Total |
| Completions | 19 |
| Attempts | 30 |
| Passing Yards | 126 |
| Touchdowns | 0 |
| Interceptions | 4 |
| Sacks Taken | 4 |
| QBR | 5.8 |
| Passer Rating | 32.8 |
The raw passing yards were not disastrous, but four interceptions completely changed the direction of the game.
Seattle disguised coverages effectively before forcing Brosmer into rushed decisions. The secondary anticipated routes exceptionally well, leading to multiple momentum changing takeaways.
The low quarterback rating reflects both inaccurate throws and poor decision making under pressure.
Sam Darnold Plays Efficient Football
Seattle quarterback Sam Darnold delivered a much quieter performance statistically.
| Statistic | Total |
| Completions | 14 |
| Attempts | 26 |
| Passing Yards | 128 |
| Touchdowns | 0 |
| Interceptions | 0 |
| Sacks Taken | 4 |
| QBR | 23.2 |
| Passer Rating | 67.5 |
Although Darnold did not throw a touchdown pass, he protected the football.
Avoiding turnovers allowed Seattle’s defense and running game to control the pace without unnecessary risks.
Sometimes the smartest quarterback performance is simply avoiding costly mistakes, and this game served as a perfect example.
Running Game Comparison
Neither offense produced massive rushing numbers, but Seattle’s commitment to the ground game proved much more effective.
Minnesota Vikings Rushing Statistics
Jordan Mason led Minnesota’s rushing attack.
| Player | Carries | Yards | Average |
| Jordan Mason | 6 | 47 | 7.8 |
Team rushing totals:
- 16 rushing attempts
- 66 rushing yards
- 4.1 yards per carry
- No rushing touchdowns
Although Mason averaged nearly eight yards per carry, Minnesota never established enough sustained drives to fully utilize him.
Frequent turnovers forced the Vikings away from their rushing game.
Seattle Seahawks Rushing Statistics
Seattle spread rushing opportunities across multiple backs.
| Player | Carries | Yards | TD |
| Kenneth Walker III | 13 | 56 | 0 |
| Zach Charbonnet | 14 | 52 | 1 |
Team rushing totals:
- 32 rushing attempts
- 125 rushing yards
- One rushing touchdown
Seattle nearly doubled Minnesota’s rushing attempts.
That commitment helped control possession, reduced pressure on the passing game, and steadily exhausted Minnesota’s defense.
One of the most underrated aspects of Seattle’s victory was patience. Even without explosive runs, consistently gaining four to five yards kept drives alive.
Receiving Leaders
Passing production remained modest on both sides because both defenses played exceptionally well.
Minnesota Receiving Leaders
| Player | Receptions | Yards |
| T.J. Hockenson | 6 | 59 |
Hockenson served as Brosmer’s primary target throughout the afternoon.
Most of his catches occurred underneath Seattle’s coverage, limiting opportunities for explosive gains.
No Minnesota receiver reached the end zone.
Seattle Receiving Leaders
| Player | Receptions | Yards |
| AJ Barner | 4 | 35 |
Seattle spread the football among several receivers rather than relying on one dominant pass catcher.
Although receiving production remained relatively modest, Seattle consistently converted important first downs while avoiding risky throws.
Defensive Performance Was the Difference
The biggest takeaway from the Minnesota Vikings vs Seahawks match player stats is the overwhelming impact of Seattle’s defense.
The Seahawks consistently pressured the quarterback, forced turnovers, defended passes aggressively, and even contributed directly to the scoreboard.
Seattle’s defensive statistics included:
- 58 total tackles
- 4 sacks
- 5 tackles for loss
- 7 quarterback hits
- 6 passes defended
- 4 interceptions
- 121 interception return yards
- 1 defensive touchdown
Those numbers represent one of the most complete defensive performances of the season.
In particular, Seattle’s secondary repeatedly anticipated Minnesota’s passing concepts, allowing defenders to break on the football before receivers could separate.
Seattle’s Defensive Stars
While every defender contributed, several players produced game changing performances.
Ernest Jones IV Delivers an Elite Defensive Performance
Ernest Jones IV was unquestionably one of the game’s most valuable players.
| Statistic | Total |
| Total Tackles | 12 |
| Interceptions | 2 |
| Interception Return Yards | 91 |
| Defensive Touchdowns | 1 |
| Passes Defended | 2 |
Jones influenced nearly every important defensive moment.
His two interceptions completely shifted momentum, while his defensive touchdown effectively removed any realistic chance of a Minnesota comeback. Beyond the turnovers, he consistently diagnosed running plays quickly and limited yards after contact.
Games like this highlight why linebackers who excel in both coverage and run support remain invaluable in today’s NFL.
Riq Woolen Continues to Shine
Seattle cornerback Riq Woolen added another takeaway to the defense’s remarkable afternoon.
| Statistic | Total |
| Interceptions | 1 |
| Return Yards | 30 |
Woolen displayed excellent awareness by reading the quarterback’s eyes before stepping into the passing lane. His interception helped maintain Seattle’s field position advantage and prevented Minnesota from building momentum.
Coby Bryant Adds Another Turnover
Coby Bryant also recorded an interception, giving Seattle four takeaways through the air.
Although his interception did not produce points directly, it reflected the outstanding communication throughout Seattle’s secondary. Every defensive back appeared well prepared for Minnesota’s passing concepts.
Minnesota’s Defensive Bright Spots
Despite allowing 26 points, Minnesota’s defense performed better than the final score may suggest.
The Vikings repeatedly faced difficult field position because of offensive turnovers, forcing the defense to defend short fields throughout the game.
Eric Wilson Led by Example
Eric Wilson delivered one of Minnesota’s strongest individual performances.
| Statistic | Total |
| Tackles | 11 |
| Sacks | 1 |
| Tackles for Loss | 4 |
| Passes Defended | 1 |
Wilson consistently disrupted Seattle’s running game and pressured the quarterback when opportunities arose.
Recording four tackles for loss demonstrates excellent anticipation and disciplined pursuit.
Minnesota Team Defensive Statistics
The Vikings finished with respectable defensive production despite spending significant time on the field.
| Category | Total |
| Total Tackles | 71 |
| Sacks | 4 |
| Tackles for Loss | 7 |
| Passes Defended | 6 |
| Quarterback Hits | 5 |
These numbers show that Minnesota’s defense created pressure and competed effectively.
Unfortunately, repeated offensive turnovers placed the unit in difficult situations that eventually became impossible to overcome.
Turnovers Decided the Football Game
Every NFL game has a defining statistic.
For this matchup, it was turnovers.
Minnesota committed four interceptions while failing to record one of its own.
The turnover margin dramatically influenced field position, scoring opportunities, and momentum.
Minnesota Turnovers
- Four interceptions thrown
- Two fumbles
- One fumble lost
Seattle Turnovers
- No interceptions thrown
- Three fumbles
- Two fumbles lost
Although Seattle also lost possession twice on fumbles, the four interceptions generated by its defense proved far more valuable.
Interceptions often create immediate scoring opportunities because they usually occur farther downfield than recovered fumbles. Seattle capitalized on those opportunities throughout the afternoon.
Special Teams Performance
Special teams frequently determine close games, but in this contest they also helped Seattle extend an already comfortable lead.
Jason Myers Was Perfect
Seattle kicker Jason Myers delivered one of the best individual special teams performances of the week.
| Statistic | Total |
| Field Goals | 4 of 4 |
| Longest Field Goal | 56 Yards |
| Extra Points | 2 of 2 |
| Total Points | 14 |
Scoring 14 points as a kicker is an exceptional contribution.
Myers consistently converted scoring opportunities, ensuring every successful drive ended with points.
His 56 yard field goal also demonstrated outstanding leg strength under game conditions.
Punting Comparison
| Player | Punts | Average | Long |
| Ryan Wright | 5 | 50.4 | 60 |
| Michael Dickson | 4 | 50.8 | 56 |
Both punters were excellent.
Each averaged more than 50 yards per punt, helping flip field position throughout the game.
Return Game Leaders
Minnesota received a strong performance from kick returner Myles Price.
| Player | Returns | Yards | Average |
| Myles Price | 6 | 169 | 28.2 |
Seattle’s Rashid Shaheed also contributed with efficient punt returns.
| Player | Returns | Yards | Average |
| Rashid Shaheed | 3 | 43 | 14.3 |
Although both return specialists generated positive yardage, Seattle consistently converted better field position into points.
Team Statistics Comparison
The overall numbers reinforce why Seattle earned a convincing victory.
| Category | Minnesota Vikings | Seattle Seahawks |
| Points | 0 | 26 |
| Passing Yards | 126 | 128 |
| Rushing Yards | 66 | 125 |
| Total Rushing Attempts | 16 | 32 |
| Passing Touchdowns | 0 | 0 |
| Rushing Touchdowns | 0 | 1 |
| Interceptions Thrown | 4 | 0 |
| Team Sacks | 4 | 4 |
| Defensive Touchdowns | 0 | 1 |
Interestingly, passing yardage was nearly identical.
The difference came from ball security, rushing efficiency, field position, and defensive execution.
This is an excellent reminder that total offensive yards rarely tell the complete story of an NFL game.
Why Seattle Controlled Every Phase
Several factors combined to produce Seattle’s shutout victory.
Dominant Defensive Execution
Seattle’s defense consistently pressured the quarterback while remaining disciplined in coverage.
The combination of four interceptions and one defensive touchdown completely changed the complexion of the game.
Commitment to the Running Game
Although neither running back produced spectacular numbers individually, Seattle remained committed to the ground attack.
Thirty two rushing attempts helped control possession and reduced unnecessary pressure on Sam Darnold.
Outstanding Special Teams
Jason Myers converted every scoring opportunity, while Michael Dickson consistently pinned Minnesota deep with quality punts.
Winning hidden yardage often separates playoff caliber teams from average ones.
Winning the Turnover Battle
Teams rarely overcome four interceptions in the NFL.
Seattle converted those mistakes into scoring opportunities and never allowed Minnesota to regain confidence.
What the Statistics Reveal Beyond the Final Score
The Minnesota Vikings vs Seahawks match player stats reveal far more than a simple 26 to 0 scoreline. While the Seahawks deserved the victory, the statistics show that this was not an offensive shootout. Instead, it was a textbook example of how defense, discipline, and field position can outweigh raw offensive production.
Seattle finished with only 128 passing yards, which would not normally be enough to produce a comfortable win. However, because the defense repeatedly created short fields and Jason Myers converted every scoring opportunity, the offense never needed to force difficult throws or take unnecessary risks.
Minnesota, meanwhile, struggled in the areas that often determine NFL games.
- Protecting the football
- Sustaining long drives
- Converting field position into points
- Responding after turnovers
Those shortcomings gradually accumulated until the Vikings found themselves unable to recover.
Biggest Winners from the Match
Several players significantly improved their individual performances and contributed directly to Seattle’s victory.
Ernest Jones IV
Ernest Jones IV was arguably the most influential player on the field.
His performance included:
- 12 tackles
- 2 interceptions
- 91 interception return yards
- 1 defensive touchdown
- 2 passes defended
Few defensive performances impact a game to this extent. Every major defensive statistic favored Jones, and his touchdown effectively put the game beyond Minnesota’s reach.
Jason Myers
Although kickers often receive less attention than offensive stars, Myers quietly produced one of the highest scoring performances of the game.
His contributions included:
- Four successful field goals
- Longest kick of 56 yards
- Two successful extra points
- Fourteen total points
Reliable kicking ensured Seattle maximized every offensive opportunity.
Kenneth Walker III
Walker did not post eye catching numbers, but his consistency kept Seattle’s offense balanced.
His 56 rushing yards helped maintain manageable third down situations and allowed Seattle to control the tempo throughout the second half.
Areas Minnesota Must Improve
Although the Vikings were outplayed, the statistics also highlight several areas where improvement could quickly change future results.
Better Quarterback Protection
Max Brosmer absorbed four sacks while facing constant defensive pressure.
Improved pass protection would allow deeper route concepts to develop and reduce hurried decisions that often lead to turnovers.
Ball Security
Throwing four interceptions is extremely difficult to overcome in professional football.
Quarterbacks, receivers, and coaches all share responsibility for improving decision making and communication.
Offensive Balance
Jordan Mason averaged an impressive 7.8 yards per carry.
Despite that efficiency, Minnesota attempted only 16 rushing plays as a team.
Maintaining a stronger commitment to the running game could help reduce pressure on the passing attack and improve time of possession.
Finishing Drives
Even when Minnesota crossed midfield, the offense failed to convert promising possessions into points.
Improving red zone execution remains a priority moving forward.
Key Takeaways for Seahawks Fans
Seattle supporters can take several positives from this performance.
First, the defense demonstrated the ability to win games independently of offensive fireworks. That is a valuable characteristic for teams with postseason ambitions.
Second, Sam Darnold managed the game effectively. While his passing numbers were modest, avoiding interceptions allowed Seattle to capitalize on its defensive dominance.
Third, the rushing attack remained dependable throughout the contest. Sharing carries between Kenneth Walker III and Zach Charbonnet kept both runners fresh and maintained offensive balance.
Finally, special teams continued to provide a competitive advantage. Jason Myers and Michael Dickson consistently delivered in high leverage situations.
Key Takeaways for Vikings Fans
Although the result was disappointing, there were still encouraging performances.
Eric Wilson played at an exceptionally high level despite difficult circumstances, recording 11 tackles, one sack, and four tackles for loss.
Jordan Mason demonstrated explosive potential whenever he carried the football.
T.J. Hockenson continued to be the offense’s most reliable receiving option, finishing with six catches for 59 yards.
However, reducing turnovers must become the team’s primary focus. NFL teams rarely recover from four interceptions, regardless of how well the defense performs.
Historical Perspective
Shutout victories are increasingly uncommon in today’s NFL because modern rules generally favor offensive production.
Seattle’s ability to hold Minnesota scoreless illustrates just how effective its defensive game plan was. Recording four interceptions, four sacks, multiple pass breakups, and a defensive touchdown in the same game is the type of performance that often defines an entire season.
For Minnesota, this game serves as a reminder that turnovers can erase otherwise competitive statistical performances.
Passing yards differed by only two yards between the teams, yet the scoreboard showed a 26 point difference.
That contrast highlights why efficiency often matters more than volume in professional football.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who won the Minnesota Vikings vs Seahawks game on December 1, 2025?
The Seattle Seahawks defeated the Minnesota Vikings by a score of 26 to 0 at home, improving their record to 9 and 3.
Who had the best performance in the Minnesota Vikings vs Seahawks match player stats?
Ernest Jones IV delivered the standout performance with 12 tackles, two interceptions, 91 interception return yards, one defensive touchdown, and two passes defended.
How many interceptions did Seattle record?
Seattle intercepted four passes. Ernest Jones IV recorded two interceptions, while Riq Woolen and Coby Bryant each added one.
Who led the Vikings in passing, rushing, and receiving?
Max Brosmer led the Vikings with 126 passing yards, Jordan Mason led the rushing attack with 47 yards, and T.J. Hockenson was the leading receiver with six catches for 59 yards.
Why did Seattle win the game?
Seattle won because of outstanding defensive execution, forcing four interceptions, scoring a defensive touchdown, controlling the rushing attack, and receiving a perfect kicking performance from Jason Myers.
What was the biggest statistical difference between the two teams?
The turnover battle was the decisive factor. Minnesota threw four interceptions, while Seattle did not throw any, giving the Seahawks a significant advantage in field position and scoring opportunities.
Conclusion
The Minnesota Vikings vs Seahawks match player stats clearly illustrate that football games are often decided by efficiency rather than overwhelming offensive production. Seattle did not rely on explosive passing numbers or highlight reel plays to secure victory. Instead, the Seahawks executed the fundamentals at an elite level by protecting the football, establishing a consistent rushing attack, forcing four interceptions, converting defensive opportunities into points, and receiving flawless special teams play.
For Minnesota, the statistics reveal several positives, including strong individual efforts from Eric Wilson, Jordan Mason, and T.J. Hockenson. However, the inability to protect the football ultimately overshadowed those performances. Four interceptions, combined with Seattle’s disciplined defense, prevented the Vikings from generating sustained offensive momentum and resulted in one of their toughest losses of the season.
From an analytical perspective, this matchup serves as an excellent example of how turnovers, field position, and complementary football can determine the outcome even when total offensive yardage is relatively similar between two teams.
