Dallas Cowboys vs Chicago Bears Match Player Stats
The Dallas Cowboys vs Chicago Bears match player stats from the NFL game played on September 21, 2025 reveal much more than the final score. While Chicago secured an impressive 31 to 14 victory, the statistics explain exactly how the Bears controlled the game from start to finish. From Caleb Williams’ flawless passing performance to Chicago’s opportunistic defense forcing three interceptions, every major statistical category highlights why the Bears earned their first win of the season while Dallas struggled to recover from early mistakes.
This complete statistical breakdown goes beyond simply listing numbers. It analyzes offensive production, defensive execution, quarterback efficiency, rushing balance, receiving performances, special teams, and the turning points that shaped the outcome. Whether you are a Cowboys supporter, a Bears fan, or simply researching the game, this guide provides a detailed look at every meaningful performance from both teams.
Match Overview
| Category | Details |
| Competition | NFL |
| Date | September 21, 2025 |
| Match | Chicago Bears vs Dallas Cowboys |
| Final Score | Chicago Bears 31, Dallas Cowboys 14 |
| Winner | Chicago Bears |
| Bears Record | 1 to 2 |
| Cowboys Record | 1 to 2 |
| Venue | Chicago Bears Home Game |
Quarter by Quarter Breakdown
| Quarter | Dallas Cowboys | Chicago Bears |
| First | 3 | 14 |
| Second | 11 | 10 |
| Third | 0 | 7 |
| Fourth | 0 | 0 |
| Final | 14 | 31 |
The opening quarter established the direction of the contest. Chicago raced to a two touchdown advantage before Dallas settled into its offense. Although the Cowboys briefly reduced the deficit during the second quarter, they failed to score after halftime while Chicago added another touchdown to comfortably protect its lead.
Dallas Cowboys vs Chicago Bears Match Player Stats: Team Comparison
| Category | Dallas Cowboys | Chicago Bears |
| Total Passing Yards | 275 | 298 |
| Passing Touchdowns | 1 | 4 |
| Interceptions Thrown | 3 | 0 |
| Passing Average | 6.5 | 10.6 |
| Team Rushing Yards | 121 | 87 |
| Rushing Attempts | 20 | 29 |
| Receiving Yards | 292 | 298 |
| Receiving Touchdowns | 1 | 4 |
| Sacks Allowed | 2 | 0 |
| Turnovers Lost | 4 | 0 |
Although Dallas actually produced more rushing efficiency, the Bears dominated the categories that matter most in winning football games. Explosive passing plays, zero turnovers, and outstanding defensive takeaways created a decisive advantage.
Quarterback Performance Analysis
Quarterback play ultimately separated these two teams.
Dak Prescott
| Statistic | Value |
| Completions | 31 |
| Attempts | 40 |
| Passing Yards | 251 |
| Touchdowns | 1 |
| Interceptions | 2 |
Prescott completed a high percentage of his passes and moved the ball effectively between the twenties. However, turnovers proved extremely costly. Two interceptions eliminated promising drives while allowing Chicago’s offense favorable field position.
Joe Milton III
| Statistic | Value |
| Completions | 3 |
| Attempts | 5 |
| Passing Yards | 41 |
| Touchdowns | 0 |
| Interceptions | 1 |
Milton’s limited appearance added another interception to Dallas’ difficult afternoon.
Caleb Williams
| Statistic | Value |
| Completions | 19 |
| Attempts | 28 |
| Passing Yards | 298 |
| Touchdowns | 4 |
| Interceptions | 0 |
Williams delivered one of his most efficient professional performances. He consistently found open receivers, avoided unnecessary risks, and finished without a single turnover.
Quarterback Comparison
| Category | Dak Prescott | Caleb Williams |
| Passing Yards | 251 | 298 |
| Touchdowns | 1 | 4 |
| Interceptions | 2 | 0 |
| Completion Percentage | 77.5% | 67.9% |
While Prescott completed a higher percentage of passes, Williams generated significantly more explosive plays and protected the football throughout the game.
Passing Offense Breakdown
Chicago’s passing attack combined efficiency with aggressiveness.
Key strengths included:
- Four touchdown passes.
- No sacks allowed.
- Zero interceptions.
- Over ten yards per pass attempt on average.
- Excellent protection from the offensive line.
Dallas accumulated respectable passing yardage but struggled with turnovers and failed to create consistent scoring opportunities.
Rushing Performance
Dallas Cowboys
| Player | Carries | Yards |
| Javonte Williams | 10 | 76 |
Dallas averaged over six yards per rushing attempt as a team, demonstrating that its ground game remained productive despite the loss.
Chicago Bears
| Player | Carries | Yards |
| D’Andre Swift | 13 | 33 |
Although Chicago averaged only three yards per carry, the Bears remained committed to the run. This helped control the game clock and supported an already dominant passing attack.
Receiving Leaders
Dallas Cowboys
| Player | Receptions | Yards | Touchdowns |
| Jake Ferguson | 13 | 82 | 0 |
| George Pickens | Not Listed | Not Listed | 1 |
Ferguson became Prescott’s preferred target throughout the afternoon, consistently moving the chains with short and intermediate receptions.
Chicago Bears
| Player | Receptions | Yards | Touchdowns |
| Luther Burden III | 3 | 101 | 1 |
| Rome Odunze | Not Listed | Not Listed | 1 |
| DJ Moore | Not Listed | Not Listed | 1 |
| Cole Kmet | Not Listed | Not Listed | 1 |
Chicago spread the football across multiple receiving threats, making it difficult for Dallas defenders to focus on any single player.
Biggest Offensive Difference
The Bears created explosive scoring opportunities through the air.
Dallas recorded:
- One passing touchdown.
- Three interceptions.
- Multiple stalled drives.
Chicago recorded:
- Four passing touchdowns.
- Zero interceptions.
- Consistent red zone execution.
Those numbers largely explain the seventeen point difference on the scoreboard.
Defensive Performance
Chicago Bears Defense
| Category | Value |
| Total Tackles | 77 |
| Solo Tackles | 48 |
| Sacks | 2 |
| Pass Deflections | 6 |
| Quarterback Hits | 7 |
| Interceptions | 3 |
Chicago’s defense constantly pressured Dallas quarterbacks without sacrificing coverage.
Defensive Standouts
Tremaine Edmunds
Edmunds intercepted two passes and repeatedly disrupted Dallas’ passing rhythm. His performance changed momentum several times and ranks among the most impactful individual defensive efforts of the game.
Kevin Byard
Byard added another interception while helping limit explosive passing plays over the middle.
Dallas Defensive Statistics
| Category | Value |
| Total Tackles | 60 |
| Solo Tackles | 37 |
| Sacks | 0 |
| Tackles for Loss | 4 |
| Pass Deflections | 3 |
| Quarterback Hits | 1 |
| Interceptions | 0 |
Dallas defended the run reasonably well but generated little pressure on Caleb Williams. Without sacks or takeaways, stopping Chicago’s passing offense became extremely difficult.
Turnovers Decided the Outcome
One of the clearest lessons from the Dallas Cowboys vs Chicago Bears match player stats is the importance of protecting the football.
Dallas committed:
- Three interceptions.
- One lost fumble.
Chicago committed:
- Zero turnovers.
Winning the turnover battle by four often leads to victory in the NFL, and this matchup was no exception.
Special Teams Performance
Dallas Cowboys
| Player | Performance |
| Brandon Aubrey | 2 for 2 Field Goals, Long 53, 6 Points |
| Bryan Anger | 2 Punts, 51.0 Average |
Aubrey remained reliable and converted both field goal attempts, including a long kick from 53 yards.
Chicago Bears
| Player | Performance |
| Cairo Santos | 1 for 1 Field Goal, 4 for 4 Extra Points |
| Tory Taylor | 4 Punts, 44.0 Average, One Inside the 20 |
Chicago’s kicking game was efficient while Taylor consistently helped control field position.
Five Biggest Reasons Chicago Won
Elite Quarterback Play
Caleb Williams threw four touchdowns without an interception while maintaining control throughout the game.
Defensive Takeaways
Three interceptions and one recovered fumble completely shifted momentum.
Balanced Offensive Strategy
Chicago successfully mixed passing and rushing plays to keep Dallas guessing.
Excellent Pass Protection
The Bears allowed zero sacks, giving Williams enough time to read the defense.
Multiple Receiving Weapons
Four different players caught touchdown passes, making defensive adjustments extremely challenging.
Areas Dallas Must Improve
Several statistics identify where Dallas needs improvement moving forward.
Better Ball Security
Four turnovers prevented the offense from building momentum.
Defensive Pressure
Recording zero sacks allowed Williams to operate comfortably all afternoon.
Red Zone Efficiency
Dallas moved the football but converted too few drives into touchdowns.
Defensive Coverage
Allowing four passing touchdowns indicates communication and coverage issues that require attention.
Individual Players Who Made the Biggest Impact
Offensive MVP
Caleb Williams
His four touchdown passes, 298 yards, and turnover free performance made him the clear offensive star.
Defensive MVP
Tremaine Edmunds
Two interceptions changed field position and prevented Dallas from mounting any serious comeback.
Best Receiver
Luther Burden III
Only three receptions produced 101 yards and one touchdown, highlighting his explosive playmaking ability.
Best Dallas Offensive Player
Javonte Williams
His 76 rushing yards on only ten carries demonstrated outstanding efficiency despite the team’s overall struggles.
Statistical Takeaways
The numbers tell a consistent story.
- Chicago produced four passing touchdowns.
- Dallas threw three interceptions.
- Chicago forced four turnovers.
- Caleb Williams finished without an interception.
- Dallas failed to score during the second half.
- Chicago allowed zero sacks.
- The Bears defense recorded seven quarterback hits.
These statistics explain why Chicago maintained control throughout most of the afternoon.
What This Result Means
For Chicago, the victory demonstrated the potential of a young offense led by Caleb Williams. Efficient quarterback play combined with aggressive defense is a formula capable of competing against quality opponents.
For Dallas, the loss highlighted concerns surrounding turnovers and defensive pressure. While the Cowboys generated respectable offensive yardage, mistakes prevented sustained success.
The game also showed how efficiency often outweighs total production. Dallas accumulated solid offensive numbers in several categories, yet Chicago’s ability to capitalize on scoring opportunities ultimately determined the final result.
FAQs
Who won the September 21, 2025 game between the Cowboys and Bears?
The Chicago Bears defeated the Dallas Cowboys by a final score of 31 to 14.
Who threw the most touchdown passes?
Caleb Williams led all quarterbacks with four touchdown passes and no interceptions.
Who was the leading receiver?
Luther Burden III led Chicago with 101 receiving yards, while Jake Ferguson led Dallas with 82 receiving yards.
How many interceptions did the Bears defense record?
Chicago intercepted three passes. Tremaine Edmunds recorded two interceptions and Kevin Byard added one.
Who was Dallas’ leading rusher?
Javonte Williams rushed for 76 yards on ten carries.
What was the biggest statistical difference in the game?
Turnovers were the deciding factor. Chicago finished with zero turnovers, while Dallas committed four.
Conclusion
The Dallas Cowboys vs Chicago Bears match player stats clearly illustrate why Chicago earned a convincing 31 to 14 victory. Caleb Williams delivered an outstanding four touchdown performance without committing a turnover, while the Bears defense created constant pressure through three interceptions and one recovered fumble. Dallas showed flashes of offensive efficiency, particularly in the running game and short passing attack, but costly mistakes erased those positives. Looking beyond the final score, this matchup serves as an excellent example of how turnover margin, quarterback efficiency, and timely defensive plays often determine NFL outcomes more than total yardage alone.
