Phoenix Suns vs Dallas Mavericks Match Player Stats
The phoenix suns vs dallas mavericks match player stats from February 11, 2026, tell a clear story about how Phoenix controlled the game through balanced offense, superior ball movement, and stronger overall rebounding. The Suns defeated the Mavericks 120-111 at Mortgage Matchup Center in Phoenix, Arizona, in front of 17,071 fans. While Dallas received major scoring contributions from Naji Marshall and Cooper Flagg, Phoenix had more players contributing across different areas of the box score.
The final score does not fully explain why Phoenix came away with the victory. Both teams shot 48 percent from the field, but the Suns created a much more productive offensive structure through 32 assists, 49 rebounds, and 16 made three-pointers. Dallas, meanwhile, relied heavily on individual scoring and free throw opportunities. The Mavericks attempted 44 free throws compared with only nine for Phoenix, yet Dallas still could not overcome Phoenix’s advantage in three-point production and playmaking.
For anyone studying the phoenix suns vs dallas mavericks match player stats, the most important lesson is that scoring totals alone do not explain this matchup. Naji Marshall led all scorers with 31 points, while Cooper Flagg added 27 for Dallas. Phoenix answered with 23 points from Dillon Brooks and 19 from Devin Booker, but the Suns also received eight assists from Collin Gillespie and 10 rebounds from Oso Ighodaro.
Phoenix Suns vs Dallas Mavericks Match Player Stats
The February 11 matchup ended with Phoenix winning 120-111. The result moved Phoenix to 32-22 overall and 18-9 at home, while Dallas dropped to 19-34 overall and 5-18 on the road.
Here is the complete team-level statistical picture from the supplied game data:
| Category | Dallas Mavericks | Phoenix Suns |
| Final Score | 111 | 120 |
| Field Goals | 37-77, 48% | 49-102, 48% |
| Three-Pointers | 5-22, 23% | 16-50, 32% |
| Free Throws | 32-44, 73% | 6-9, 67% |
| Rebounds | 42 | 49 |
| Assists | 18 | 32 |
| Turnovers | 16 | 13 |
| Steals | 7 | 8 |
| Blocks | 5 | 3 |
| Record | 19-34 | 32-22 |
| Home/Away Record | 5-18 away | 18-9 home |
The most striking difference was three-point shooting. Dallas made only five three-pointers on 22 attempts, while Phoenix made 16 on 50 attempts. That gave the Suns a substantial advantage from beyond the arc.
Phoenix also produced 14 more assists than Dallas. That is an important indicator of offensive organization. Dallas scored 111 points, but Phoenix generated 120 while moving the ball much more effectively.
Game Overview
The game was played at Mortgage Matchup Center in Phoenix, with an announced attendance of 17,071. Phoenix entered the contest with a much stronger home record, while Dallas had struggled away from home.
The Mavericks finished 5-18 on the road at that point, making the matchup particularly difficult against a Phoenix team that was 18-9 at home.
Dallas still competed offensively. The Mavericks shot 48 percent from the field and made 32 free throws. Naji Marshall was the team’s leading scorer with 31 points, and Cooper Flagg contributed 27.
However, Phoenix’s offensive balance proved decisive.
The Suns made 49 field goals compared with 37 for Dallas. Even though both teams finished at 48 percent from the field, Phoenix’s much higher volume of made shots created a major difference.
Phoenix also made 16 three-pointers. Dallas made only five.
That 11-made-three difference is one of the clearest statistical explanations for the final result.
Naji Marshall Leads Dallas With 31 Points
Naji Marshall was Dallas’s most productive scorer in the matchup.
He finished with:
- 31 points
- 4 rebounds
- 2 assists
- 2 turnovers
- 1 steal
Marshall’s 31 points made him the leading scorer for either team. His scoring was particularly important because Dallas did not receive enough three-point production from the team as a whole.
The Mavericks shot 5-for-22 from three-point range. That is only 23 percent.
Marshall therefore carried a significant portion of Dallas’s offensive burden. His scoring helped keep the Mavericks competitive, but his individual production could not fully compensate for the team’s disadvantage from long range and its lower assist total.
One useful way to interpret his performance is to separate individual scoring from team offensive efficiency. Marshall had an excellent scoring night, but basketball is ultimately a possession-based team sport. Phoenix generated more assists, more made field goals, more three-pointers, and more total points.
Cooper Flagg Provides 27 Points
Cooper Flagg was another major contributor for Dallas.
His final line was:
- 27 points
- 5 rebounds
- 2 assists
- 3 turnovers
- 1 steal
Flagg finished just behind Marshall in Dallas scoring, giving the Mavericks two players with at least 27 points.
That scoring production was one of the positive takeaways for Dallas. The Mavericks were able to create significant individual offense despite losing the game by nine points.
Flagg’s 27 points also meant that the Mavericks had a reliable second scoring option alongside Marshall.
The issue was that the supporting statistical structure did not match Phoenix’s. Dallas recorded only 18 assists, compared with 32 for Phoenix. The Mavericks also committed 16 turnovers, three more than the Suns.
Those possession and creation differences matter when two teams are separated by only nine points.
Dillon Brooks Leads Phoenix in Scoring
Dillon Brooks finished as Phoenix’s leading scorer with 23 points.
His recorded line included:
- 23 points
- 4 rebounds
- 1 assist
- 2 turnovers
Brooks did not reach the 30-point mark, but Phoenix did not need one player to dominate the scoring column.
That is one of the most important features of the Suns’ performance.
Phoenix had multiple contributors and generated 32 assists. The team made 49 field goals, including 16 three-pointers.
Brooks’ 23 points therefore worked as part of a broader offensive system rather than as an isolated scoring performance.
For analysts examining the phoenix suns vs dallas mavericks match player stats, this distinction is important. Dallas had the highest individual scorer in Marshall, but Phoenix had the more effective team scoring structure.
Devin Booker Contributes Across the Box Score
Devin Booker finished with 19 points, four rebounds, six assists, three turnovers, and two steals.
His scoring was lower than Marshall’s and Brooks’ totals, but his overall contribution was much broader.
Booker’s six assists were especially valuable in a game where Phoenix finished with 32 team assists.
His two steals also contributed to Phoenix’s defensive activity.
Booker’s line demonstrates why evaluating a player’s performance only through points can be misleading. A player can influence a game through passing, rebounding, defensive plays, and possession management.
In this matchup, Booker’s six assists helped support the offensive balance that allowed Phoenix to score 120 points without requiring him to lead the team in scoring.
Oso Ighodaro Controls the Rebounding Battle
Oso Ighodaro led Phoenix in rebounding with 10 boards.
That was the only double-digit individual rebounding total identified in the supplied player data, and it helped Phoenix finish with 49 team rebounds.
Dallas recorded 42 rebounds.
The seven-rebound team advantage was another meaningful part of the Suns’ victory.
Rebounding is particularly important in a game involving significant three-point volume. Missed perimeter shots can create long rebounds and additional transition opportunities. Controlling those possessions helps a team prevent second chances while creating opportunities of its own.
Ighodaro’s 10 rebounds therefore deserve attention even though his scoring did not lead the team.
Collin Gillespie Provides Eight Assists
Collin Gillespie was Phoenix’s leading assist provider with eight assists.
That figure is important because Phoenix finished with 32 total assists.
His passing helped maintain the ball movement that separated the two offenses.
Dallas finished with 18 assists, meaning Phoenix recorded 14 more assists overall.
That is a very large difference.
The Suns were not simply making more shots. They were creating more opportunities for teammates.
This is one reason the final score should be analyzed beyond the headline scoring numbers. The Suns’ offensive advantage came from collective creation.
Shooting Efficiency Was Similar, But Shot Profile Was Not
One of the most interesting aspects of the game is that both teams finished at 48 percent from the field.
At first glance, that may suggest relatively similar shooting performances.
However, the three-point numbers reveal a major difference.
Dallas:
- 37-for-77 from the field
- 5-for-22 from three
- 32-for-44 from the free throw line
Phoenix:
- 49-for-102 from the field
- 16-for-50 from three
- 6-for-9 from the free throw line
Phoenix attempted 25 more field goals and 28 more three-point attempts.
The Suns made 11 more three-pointers.
Dallas compensated somewhat by reaching the free throw line much more often. The Mavericks made 32 free throws compared with only six for Phoenix.
Even with that major free throw advantage, Dallas finished nine points behind.
That makes Phoenix’s three-point production one of the central statistical reasons for the result.
The Three-Point Difference Changed the Game
Phoenix’s 16 made three-pointers compared with Dallas’s five created an enormous scoring advantage.
Each made three-pointer is worth three points, so the difference in made threes alone represents 33 additional points for Phoenix relative to Dallas’s made-three total.
Of course, basketball scoring cannot be reduced to one category because field goals, free throws, possessions, and shot attempts all interact.
Still, the 16-to-5 difference provides an excellent explanation for why Phoenix could overcome Dallas’s 32 made free throws.
Dallas shot only 23 percent from three.
That made it difficult for the Mavericks to match Phoenix’s scoring pace.
The Suns shot 32 percent from three, which was not an elite percentage on its own, but their volume resulted in 16 made shots from outside.
This is an important analytical distinction. Three-point impact depends on both accuracy and volume.
Phoenix Won the Ball-Movement Battle
Phoenix recorded 32 assists.
Dallas recorded 18.
The 14-assist difference is significant.
It suggests that Phoenix generated a much larger percentage of its offense through assisted scoring opportunities.
The Suns also committed 13 turnovers compared with 16 for Dallas.
That gave Phoenix advantages in both creation and ball security.
The combination of 32 assists and 13 turnovers produced a much healthier offensive profile than Dallas’s 18 assists and 16 turnovers.
Dallas still scored 111 points, but the team needed a large free throw advantage to stay close.
Phoenix, by contrast, created scoring opportunities through passing and perimeter shooting.
Turnovers and Defensive Activity
Phoenix committed 13 turnovers and Dallas committed 16.
The three-turnover difference was not enormous, but it favored the winning team.
Phoenix also recorded eight steals compared with seven for Dallas.
Dallas had five blocks, while Phoenix had three.
These numbers show that Dallas was not defensively passive. The Mavericks produced more blocks and stayed active defensively.
However, Phoenix’s combination of steals, fewer turnovers, and stronger offensive execution ultimately proved more important.
The Suns were able to protect possessions better while also creating more assists.
Free Throws Tell a Different Story
If someone looked only at free throw production, Dallas would appear to have a clear advantage.
The Mavericks went 32-for-44 from the line.
Phoenix went only 6-for-9.
Dallas therefore made 26 more free throws than Phoenix.
That is a huge difference.
Yet the Mavericks still lost by nine.
This is a useful reminder that no single box-score category tells the complete story.
Phoenix compensated through field goals and three-point shooting.
The Suns made 12 more field goals than Dallas, 49 compared with 37.
They also made 11 more three-pointers.
Those advantages outweighed Dallas’s free throw dominance.
Rebounding Gave Phoenix Extra Possession Value
Phoenix finished with 49 rebounds.
Dallas recorded 42.
That seven-rebound advantage may not look as dramatic as the three-point difference, but it contributed to Phoenix’s overall control of the game.
More rebounds can lead to more opportunities to start possessions, particularly when defensive rebounds end Dallas possessions.
Oso Ighodaro’s 10 rebounds were the individual highlight in this category.
Naji Marshall led Dallas with four rebounds, while Cooper Flagg had five.
The fact that Dallas’s leading scorer collected only four rebounds also shows how difficult it was for the Mavericks to match Phoenix’s overall rebounding output.
Comparing the Main Players
The clearest individual comparison is between Dallas’s Naji Marshall and Phoenix’s Dillon Brooks.
Marshall:
- 31 points
- 4 rebounds
- 2 assists
- 2 turnovers
- 1 steal
Brooks:
- 23 points
- 4 rebounds
- 1 assist
- 2 turnovers
Marshall won the individual scoring battle by eight points.
However, Phoenix won the team game.
That contrast is valuable for anyone using player statistics to evaluate performance. The highest-scoring player does not necessarily belong to the winning team.
Cooper Flagg also outscored Devin Booker, 27 points to 19.
Yet Booker provided six assists and two steals, while Flagg recorded five rebounds, two assists, three turnovers, and one steal.
The comparison demonstrates how different player roles can be.
Player Statistical Leaders
Dallas Mavericks Leaders
Leading scorer: Naji Marshall, 31 points
Second-leading scorer: Cooper Flagg, 27 points
Top rebounder: Cooper Flagg, 5 rebounds
Top assist provider: Tyus Jones, 3 assists
Marshall was the clear scoring leader for Dallas.
Flagg’s 27 points gave the Mavericks a strong one-two scoring combination, but the team did not receive enough three-point production to match Phoenix.
Tyus Jones led Dallas in assists with three, which highlights the team’s 18-assist total.
Phoenix Suns Leaders
Leading scorer: Dillon Brooks, 23 points
Second-leading scorer: Devin Booker, 19 points
Top rebounder: Oso Ighodaro, 10 rebounds
Top assist provider: Collin Gillespie, 8 assists
Phoenix’s leaders were distributed across different statistical categories.
Brooks led scoring.
Ighodaro led rebounding.
Gillespie led assists.
Booker contributed across scoring, passing, and defense.
That balance is one of the strongest themes in the game.
Why Phoenix Won
The nine-point victory can be explained through several connected factors.
1. Superior three-point production
Phoenix made 16 three-pointers.
Dallas made five.
That was the biggest shooting difference in the game.
2. More assists
Phoenix recorded 32 assists.
Dallas recorded 18.
The Suns generated much more offense through passing.
3. More rebounds
Phoenix collected 49 rebounds.
Dallas collected 42.
The Suns controlled the glass by seven rebounds.
4. Fewer turnovers
Phoenix had 13 turnovers.
Dallas had 16.
The three-possession difference favored Phoenix.
5. Balanced scoring
Dallas had two players at 27 or more points.
Phoenix did not need a 30-point scorer because its offensive contributions were spread across the lineup.
Why Dallas Lost Despite 111 Points
Losing by nine points while scoring 111 can make the result appear competitive, and it was.
Dallas had several strengths.
The Mavericks shot 48 percent from the field and received 31 points from Marshall and 27 from Flagg.
They also made 32 free throws.
But the three-point shooting was a major weakness.
Five made threes were not enough to keep pace with Phoenix’s 16.
Dallas also had fewer assists and rebounds while committing more turnovers.
The Mavericks were therefore productive in certain individual areas but less balanced across the full box score.
The Importance of Context When Reading Player Stats
A player-stat article should not simply reproduce numbers from a box score.
The value comes from explaining what those numbers mean.
For example, Marshall’s 31 points were excellent, but they occurred in a game where Dallas lost.
Booker’s 19 points may look less impressive than Marshall’s total, but Booker added six assists and two steals while playing within a team that generated 32 assists.
Likewise, Ighodaro’s 10 rebounds may not attract as much attention as a 20-plus-point scoring performance, but rebounding helped Phoenix win the overall possession battle.
The strongest analysis therefore connects individual numbers to team outcomes.
What the Matchup Reveals About Both Teams
The game provided a useful snapshot of two different offensive approaches.
Dallas relied heavily on individual scoring and free throws.
Phoenix generated more offense through ball movement, perimeter shooting, and rebounding.
Neither approach is automatically better in every game.
However, on February 11, Phoenix’s approach produced the stronger result.
The Suns finished with 120 points while recording 32 assists.
Dallas scored 111 while recording 18 assists.
That 14-assist gap is difficult to ignore.
Head-to-Head Series Context
The supplied data shows Phoenix won the first two meetings of the season at the time of the February 11 game.
The first listed matchup was November 13, when Phoenix defeated Dallas 123-114.
The second was February 11, when Phoenix won 120-111.
That gave Phoenix a 2-0 lead in the series after the February meeting.
The supplied schedule also lists a later April 9 meeting in which Dallas defeated Phoenix 112-107.
That later result means the completed three-game season series was 2-1 in Phoenix’s favor.
This distinction matters when presenting historical statistics. The February 11 result should be described as Phoenix taking a 2-0 series lead at that point, rather than suggesting Phoenix ultimately swept the season series.
A Closer Look at the Offensive Balance
Phoenix’s 49 made field goals were 12 more than Dallas’s 37.
That is a substantial difference.
The Suns also attempted 102 field goals compared with Dallas’s 77.
The shooting percentage was identical at 48 percent, which makes the shot-volume difference even more important.
Phoenix simply generated many more field goal attempts.
That volume was supported by rebounding, passing, and possession management.
Dallas, meanwhile, had a much stronger free throw profile.
The Mavericks made 32 free throws.
The Suns made six.
The game therefore illustrates two very different ways to accumulate points.
Dallas generated a large amount of offense at the free throw line.
Phoenix generated a much larger amount of offense through field goals and three-point shooting.
What Readers Should Take From the Box Score
If you are comparing these teams using player statistics, several numbers deserve priority.
First, look at the three-point difference.
Second, examine assists because they reveal how efficiently teams create scoring opportunities for teammates.
Third, compare rebounds because they provide insight into possession control.
Fourth, look at turnovers.
Finally, examine individual scoring totals within the context of team efficiency.
Using those five areas provides a much better understanding than simply looking at the top scorer.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who scored the most points in the Phoenix Suns vs Dallas Mavericks game?
Naji Marshall led all scorers with 31 points for Dallas. Cooper Flagg followed with 27 points. Phoenix’s leading scorer was Dillon Brooks with 23 points.
What was the final score between Phoenix and Dallas?
Phoenix defeated Dallas 120-111 on February 11, 2026, at Mortgage Matchup Center in Phoenix.
How many points did Devin Booker score?
Devin Booker scored 19 points. He also recorded four rebounds, six assists, three turnovers, and two steals.
Who led the Suns in rebounds?
Oso Ighodaro led Phoenix with 10 rebounds.
Who had the most assists for Phoenix?
Collin Gillespie led the Suns with eight assists.
Why did Phoenix beat Dallas?
Phoenix’s victory was driven primarily by its three-point shooting, 32 assists, 49 rebounds, and lower turnover total. The Suns made 16 three-pointers compared with five by Dallas.
Conclusion
The phoenix suns vs dallas mavericks match player stats from February 11, 2026, show why Phoenix earned a 120-111 victory despite Dallas producing the game’s highest individual scorer.
Naji Marshall’s 31 points and Cooper Flagg’s 27 points gave Dallas strong individual scoring. The Mavericks also made 32 free throws, an enormous advantage over Phoenix’s six.
However, Phoenix won the categories that shaped the overall offensive structure. The Suns made 49 field goals, 16 three-pointers, collected 49 rebounds, produced 32 assists, and committed only 13 turnovers.
Dillon Brooks led Phoenix with 23 points, while Devin Booker contributed 19 points, six assists, four rebounds, and two steals. Oso Ighodaro’s 10 rebounds and Collin Gillespie’s eight assists further demonstrated the balanced nature of Phoenix’s performance.
The most revealing comparison is not Marshall versus Brooks or Flagg versus Booker. It is Dallas’s 18 assists against Phoenix’s 32, combined with Dallas’s five made threes against Phoenix’s 16.
That is the clearest statistical explanation for the result.
The February 11 victory also gave Phoenix a 2-0 lead in the season series at that stage. The supplied schedule later records a Dallas victory on April 9, making the completed series 2-1 in Phoenix’s favor.
Ultimately, this matchup demonstrates why player statistics should always be read alongside team-level numbers. Individual scoring can identify who produced points, but assists, rebounds, shooting distribution, turnovers, and shot volume explain how a game was actually won.
