Los angeles rams vs Cleveland browns match player stats

Los Angeles Rams vs Cleveland Browns match player stats from the 2025 NFL preseason provide a detailed look at how both teams moved the football, protected their quarterbacks, created explosive plays, and finished scoring opportunities. The Browns defeated the Rams 19-17 on August 23, 2025, at Huntington Bank Field in Cleveland, closing the preseason with a perfect 3-0 record while Los Angeles finished 2-1.

Although the final score was decided by only two points, the underlying numbers tell a much more interesting story. Cleveland produced 256 total net yards compared with 268 for Los Angeles, while the Rams had the stronger rushing total with 99 yards. Cleveland, however, generated 171 net passing yards and converted five of 13 third downs, compared with just one successful third-down conversion on 12 attempts by Los Angeles.

That contrast is important when evaluating preseason football. A narrow final score does not always identify which team controlled every statistical category. The Rams moved the ball well enough to score 17 points, but Cleveland’s ability to stay ahead of the chains, create pressure, and capitalize on key possessions helped produce the 19-17 result.

Game Overview

The matchup was the third and final preseason game for both teams. NFL’s official schedule confirms that Los Angeles entered the game 2-0 in the preseason, while Cleveland had already won its first two games. The Browns ultimately completed the preseason at 3-0, while the Rams ended 2-1.

The game was played at Huntington Bank Field in Cleveland.

The scoring progression was:

Quarter	Rams	Browns
First	0	7
Second	7	9
Third	3	0
Fourth	7	3
Final	17	19

Cleveland opened the scoring when Joe Flacco connected with Harold Fannin Jr. for a 15-yard touchdown. The Browns later added a field goal before Los Angeles responded with a touchdown pass from Dresser Winn to Drake Stoops.

Dillon Gabriel then helped Cleveland regain momentum with a touchdown pass to Gage Larvadain. Los Angeles added a third-quarter field goal before Jordan Waters scored on a two-yard rushing touchdown in the fourth quarter.

With the Rams leading 17-16 late in the fourth quarter, Cleveland’s Andre Szmyt converted a 37-yard field goal as time expired to secure the 19-17 victory. The official NFL game center and game book document the complete scoring sequence and statistical record.

That final drive is one of the clearest reminders that preseason statistics should be examined within the context of game situations. Cleveland did not need a touchdown to win. It needed only a field goal, and it managed to reach the required range before the clock expired.

Complete Passing Breakdown

The passing numbers are among the most useful parts of the Los Angeles Rams vs Cleveland Browns match player stats because both teams used multiple quarterbacks.

Dresser Winn, Los Angeles Rams

Dresser Winn led the Rams’ passing attack and delivered a productive statistical performance.

Statistic	Dresser Winn
Completions	15
Attempts	23
Completion Rate	65.2%
Passing Yards	190
Yards per Attempt	8.3
Touchdowns	1
Interceptions	0
Sacks	4
Sack Yards	21
Passer Rating	105.3
Long Completion	33 yards

Winn completed 15 of 23 passes for 190 yards and one touchdown without throwing an interception. His 8.3 yards per attempt indicates that Los Angeles was not relying exclusively on short throws.

The most impressive aspect of the performance was the combination of efficiency and explosiveness. Winn averaged more than eight yards per attempt and produced a 33-yard completion. At the same time, he was sacked four times for 21 yards.

That pressure matters because the Rams finished with 268 total net yards despite generating 190 gross passing yards. Once the 21 sack yards were removed, their net passing figure fell to 169 yards.

This distinction explains why a passing line can look excellent while the overall offensive efficiency remains more mixed.

Dillon Gabriel, Cleveland Browns

Dillon Gabriel completed 12 of 19 passes for 129 yards and one touchdown.

Statistic	Dillon Gabriel
Completions	12
Attempts	19
Completion Rate	63.2%
Passing Yards	129
Yards per Attempt	6.8
Touchdowns	1
Interceptions	0
Sacks	0
Passer Rating	100.5
Long Completion	16 yards

Gabriel did not throw an interception and avoided being sacked. That is particularly notable when compared with the four sacks absorbed by Winn.

Gabriel’s 6.8 yards per attempt was lower than Winn’s 8.3, but his ability to avoid negative plays helped Cleveland maintain offensive stability.

His touchdown pass to Gage Larvadain capped an 86-yard drive that put Cleveland ahead 16-7 late in the second quarter.

The official NFL player log lists Gabriel at 12 completions on 19 attempts for 129 yards, one touchdown and a 100.5 rating in this game.

Joe Flacco, Cleveland Browns

Joe Flacco played a limited but efficient role.

Statistic	Joe Flacco
Completions	9
Attempts	10
Completion Rate	90.0%
Passing Yards	71
Yards per Attempt	7.1
Touchdowns	1
Interceptions	0
Sacks	1
Sack Yards	9
Passer Rating	129.6

Flacco’s 9-for-10 performance was the highest completion percentage among the quarterbacks who had multiple attempts.

He also threw Cleveland’s opening touchdown to Harold Fannin Jr. on a 15-yard play.

NFL’s game coverage reported that Flacco played three offensive series and used the appearance as a tune-up before the regular season. The report also noted that he was named Cleveland’s Week 1 starter.

The key point from a statistical perspective is that Flacco was extremely efficient during his limited workload. His 129.6 passer rating was also the highest quarterback rating in the game.

Shedeur Sanders, Cleveland Browns

Shedeur Sanders had a difficult statistical outing.

Statistic	Shedeur Sanders
Completions	3
Attempts	6
Completion Rate	50.0%
Passing Yards	14
Yards per Attempt	2.3
Touchdowns	0
Interceptions	0
Sacks	5
Sack Yards	41
Passer Rating	56.2

The most important number is not simply the 14 passing yards. It is the five sacks for 41 yards.

Those sacks significantly reduced Cleveland’s net passing efficiency during his snaps. Sanders did not throw an interception, but Cleveland struggled to sustain offensive progress during his portion of the game.

Tyler Huntley, Cleveland Browns

Tyler Huntley attempted one pass and completed it for seven yards.

Statistic	Tyler Huntley
Completions	1
Attempts	1
Passing Yards	7
Touchdowns	0
Interceptions	0
Sacks	0
Passer Rating	95.8

His workload was too small to support meaningful individual conclusions, but his completion gave Cleveland another completed pass in the overall team total.

Team Passing Comparison

The combined passing numbers reveal why Cleveland won despite producing fewer total yards.

Category	Rams	Browns
Completions	15	25
Attempts	23	36
Completion Rate	65.2%	69.4%
Gross Passing Yards	190	221
Sack Yards	21	50
Net Passing Yards	169	171
Passing TDs	1	2
Interceptions	0	0

The most interesting statistic is net passing yardage.

The Rams produced 190 gross passing yards but lost 21 yards on sacks, leaving them with 169 net passing yards.

The Browns produced 221 gross passing yards but lost 50 yards on sacks, leaving them with 171 net passing yards.

So although Cleveland allowed substantially more sack yardage, the Browns still finished two net passing yards ahead of Los Angeles.

This is an excellent example of why NFL analysis should distinguish between gross passing yards and net passing yards.

Rams Rushing Performance

The Rams ran the ball 28 times for 99 yards, averaging 3.5 yards per carry.

Jordan Waters led the team.

Player	Carries	Yards	Average	Long	TD
Jordan Waters	6	42	7.0	18	1
Brennan Presley	3	23	7.7	18	0
Jarquez Hunter	7	14	2.0	6	0
Cody Schrader	9	13	1.4	7	0
Dresser Winn	3	7	2.3	5	0
Darius Sampson	2	3	1.5	4	0

Waters was the most productive Rams runner by yardage and scored the team’s only rushing touchdown.

His six carries produced 42 yards, giving him a 7.0-yard average. His 18-yard run was also tied for the team’s longest rushing play.

Brennan Presley averaged 7.7 yards on only three carries and also recorded an 18-yard gain.

The overall team average of 3.5 yards per carry was pulled down by the production of the other runners. Cody Schrader received the largest rushing workload with nine carries but averaged only 1.4 yards per attempt.

That distribution is worth noting. The Rams had explosive contributions from Waters and Presley, but their rushing attack was not consistently efficient across the entire rotation.

Browns Rushing Performance

Cleveland ran 22 times for 85 yards, averaging 3.9 yards per carry.

Player	Carries	Yards	Average	Long	TD
Ahmani Marshall	10	31	3.1	6	0
Pierre Strong Jr.	5	25	5.0	8	0
Jerome Ford	2	14	7.0	11	0
Tyler Huntley	2	8	4.0	9	0
Trayveon Williams	1	4	4.0	4	0

Ahmani Marshall received the largest rushing workload with 10 carries.

Pierre Strong Jr. averaged 5.0 yards per carry, while Jerome Ford produced seven yards per carry on two attempts.

The Browns did not score a rushing touchdown, but they did not need one to win. Their scoring came through two passing touchdowns, a field goal, and the late field goal that ultimately decided the game.

Receiving Breakdown

The receiving statistics provide another useful layer of the matchup.

Rams Receivers

Receiver	Targets	Receptions	Yards	Average	Long	TD
Brennan Presley	3	3	51	17.0	24	0
Terrance Ferguson	3	2	48	24.0	33	0
Britain Covey	6	4	32	8.0	15	0
Drake Stoops	6	4	23	5.8	15	1
Tyler Edwards	2	1	25	25.0	25	0
Marcus Redman	1	1	11	11.0	11	0

Brennan Presley led Los Angeles with 51 receiving yards on three catches.

His 17.0-yard average shows how effectively the Rams generated production when targeting him.

Terrance Ferguson was even more explosive on a per-catch basis. He caught two passes for 48 yards, averaging 24 yards per reception. His longest reception went for 33 yards, which was also the longest completed pass by Winn.

Drake Stoops produced the Rams’ receiving touchdown, scoring on a one-yard pass from Winn in the second quarter.

The receiving distribution suggests that Los Angeles was capable of creating chunk plays even though it did not consistently sustain drives.

Browns Receivers

Receiver	Targets	Receptions	Yards	Average	Long	TD
Jamari Thrash	5	3	42	14.0	16	0
Gage Larvadain	7	4	28	7.0	16	1
David Njoku	2	2	20	10.0	15	0
Harold Fannin Jr.	2	2	16	8.0	15	1
Solomon Cannella	3	3	20	6.7	7	0
Trayveon Williams	4	2	10	5.0	6	0

Jamari Thrash led Cleveland with 42 receiving yards.

Gage Larvadain led the Browns with seven targets and scored the team’s second touchdown on a three-yard reception from Gabriel.

Harold Fannin Jr. also scored, catching a 15-yard touchdown from Flacco.

One notable feature of Cleveland’s passing attack was distribution. The Browns completed 25 passes, and several different players contributed receptions. That helped spread the offensive workload across the quarterback rotation.

Los Angeles Rams vs Cleveland Browns Match Player Stats: Defensive Impact

Offensive numbers explain only part of the game.

The defensive figures help explain why a team that generated 268 total net yards still lost by two points.

The Rams recorded:

• 72 total tackles
• 43 solo tackles
• 6 sacks
• 8 tackles for loss
• 3 passes defended
• 4 quarterback hits
• 0 interceptions

The Browns recorded:

• 67 total tackles
• 31 solo tackles
• 4 sacks
• 7 tackles for loss
• 4 passes defended
• 10 quarterback hits
• 0 interceptions

Neither team intercepted a pass.

That matters because the game was decided without a turnover-based interception swing. Both teams protected the football relatively well, with each side recovering its own fumbles.

The Rams generated more sacks, recording six compared with Cleveland’s four. However, the Browns produced 10 quarterback hits compared with four for Los Angeles.

That creates an interesting distinction between pressure volume and pressure impact.

Los Angeles recorded more sacks, but Cleveland consistently generated contact around the quarterback. The five sacks absorbed by Sanders were particularly costly during his playing time.

The Importance of Third Down

Third-down efficiency is one of the strongest statistical differences in this matchup.

Los Angeles converted only one of 12 third-down attempts.

Cleveland converted five of 13.

That means Cleveland converted 38.5% of its third downs, while Los Angeles converted only 8.3%.

The difference is substantial.

A team can produce explosive plays and still struggle to sustain possessions if it cannot convert manageable third downs. The Rams showed that pattern in this game.

Cleveland was not dramatically more efficient in total yards. In fact, the Rams produced 268 total net yards compared with Cleveland’s 256.

The difference came partly from how Cleveland sustained drives.

The Browns finished with 22 first downs compared with 14 for Los Angeles. They also had 14 passing first downs compared with eight for the Rams.

This combination of first downs and third-down efficiency helped Cleveland control the game even though the total-yard difference favored Los Angeles.

Red Zone Efficiency

Both teams were effective when they reached the red zone.

Los Angeles went 2-for-2 in red-zone opportunities.

Cleveland went 2-for-4.

The Rams converted both of their red-zone possessions into touchdowns.

Cleveland converted two of four opportunities, with one of the other possessions ending in a field goal.

This is an important reminder that red-zone percentage alone does not tell the whole story.

Cleveland’s four red-zone opportunities gave it more chances to score than Los Angeles had. Although the Browns were less efficient by percentage, they generated enough opportunities to produce 19 points.

Los Angeles, meanwhile, was perfect in its two red-zone trips but did not create enough additional scoring opportunities to overcome Cleveland’s total scoring output.

Explosive Plays and Offensive Efficiency

The Rams had several explosive individual plays.

Brennan Presley produced an 18-yard rushing gain and a 24-yard reception.

Terrance Ferguson recorded a 33-yard catch.

Jordan Waters added an 18-yard run.

The Browns had fewer explosive plays in the supplied offensive figures, but they compensated through sustained drives.

Cleveland’s opening touchdown drive covered 44 yards.

Its field-goal drive in the second quarter covered 70 yards.

The Larvadain touchdown drive traveled 86 yards.

The final field-goal drive covered 46 yards.

That 86-yard drive was especially significant because it gave Cleveland a chance to build a 16-7 lead before halftime.

Time of Possession

Cleveland held the ball for 31:01.

Los Angeles had possession for 28:59.

The difference was only 2:02, but it fits the broader statistical picture.

The Browns produced 22 first downs and converted five of 13 third downs. Those numbers allowed Cleveland to keep possessions alive and spend more time on offense.

Los Angeles still generated 14 first downs and 268 net yards, but its 1-for-12 third-down performance limited its ability to sustain drives.

In a close game, two minutes of possession can become meaningful when combined with late-game execution.

Turnovers and Ball Security

Neither team recorded an interception.

The Rams had two fumbles and recovered both.

The Browns had one fumble and recovered it.

Therefore, neither team lost a fumble.

That is one reason the final result cannot be explained through conventional turnover margin. The turnover margin was effectively even.

The Rams also avoided throwing an interception despite using a quarterback who attempted 23 passes.

Cleveland’s quarterbacks likewise combined for zero interceptions.

This makes the game particularly useful for evaluating efficiency beyond turnover luck.

What the Numbers Say About the Rams

The Rams’ statistical profile was built around passing efficiency, rushing explosiveness, and defensive pressure.

Dresser Winn produced 190 passing yards, one touchdown and no interceptions.

Jordan Waters averaged 7.0 yards per carry.

Brennan Presley contributed both as a runner and receiver.

Terrance Ferguson produced a 33-yard reception.

The defense generated six sacks.

Those numbers show that Los Angeles had several positive individual performances.

The biggest problem was consistency.

A 1-for-12 third-down rate is difficult to overcome, especially when playing on the road in a game decided by two points.

The Rams also allowed Cleveland to record 22 first downs.

So while Los Angeles generated enough explosive plays to stay competitive, it did not maintain the same level of drive-to-drive efficiency.

What the Numbers Say About the Browns

Cleveland’s statistical profile was more balanced.

The Browns had 22 first downs, 256 total net yards, 171 net passing yards, and 85 rushing yards.

The quarterback group produced two passing touchdowns without an interception.

Flacco was highly efficient during his limited workload, Gabriel delivered a touchdown drive without taking a sack, and Huntley completed his only pass.

At the same time, Sanders experienced heavy pressure.

The Browns also converted five of 13 third downs and generated 10 quarterback hits.

The biggest offensive advantage was not one dominant individual statistical line. Instead, it was the cumulative effect of multiple contributors.

That helped Cleveland remain competitive through four quarters and gave the team enough opportunities to win on the final possession.

Why the Final Score Was So Close

The final score of 19-17 reflects how evenly matched many of the major statistical categories were.

Los Angeles had:

• More total net yards
• More rushing yards
• More sacks
• A perfect red-zone touchdown rate
• A 190-yard passing performance from Winn

Cleveland had:

• More first downs
• More net passing yards
• More passing touchdowns
• Better third-down conversion
• More quarterback hits
• A late-game field goal opportunity that decided the game

The Rams’ 268 total yards were 12 more than Cleveland’s 256.

Yet Cleveland scored two more points.

That difference illustrates why total yards are useful but incomplete as a measure of game performance.

Field position, down-and-distance situations, scoring opportunities, third downs, and late-game execution can all influence the final result.

A Closer Look at Dresser Winn’s Performance

Winn deserves particular attention because he accounted for most of Los Angeles’ passing production.

His 15 completions on 23 attempts produced a 65.2% completion rate.

His 190 yards came at 8.3 yards per attempt.

He threw one touchdown and no interceptions.

His 105.3 passer rating was also strong.

However, four sacks reduced his net passing production.

This creates a useful evaluation framework.

If the question is whether Winn was capable of making effective throws, the numbers provide evidence that he was.

If the question is whether Los Angeles consistently protected him and maintained efficient passing situations, the four sacks provide a different perspective.

Both observations can be true at the same time.

A Closer Look at Joe Flacco’s Efficiency

Flacco’s numbers were impressive because of the limited number of attempts.

He completed nine of 10 passes for 71 yards and one touchdown.

His 90% completion rate was the highest among the game’s multi-attempt quarterbacks.

His 129.6 passer rating also led all quarterbacks.

The most important context is workload.

Ten attempts are not enough to compare directly with Winn’s 23 attempts or Gabriel’s 19 attempts. Flacco’s statistics describe a short appearance rather than a full-game workload.

Still, his opening touchdown drive demonstrated efficient execution with the first-team offense.

What Made Brennan Presley Stand Out?

Brennan Presley was one of the more versatile contributors in the game.

He carried the ball three times for 23 yards.

He also caught all three of his targets for 51 yards.

His receiving average was 17.0 yards per catch.

His 24-yard reception was one of the Rams’ most productive passing plays.

Combining his rushing and receiving production gives him 74 yards from scrimmage.

That figure makes him one of the more productive individual offensive contributors for Los Angeles in this matchup.

What Made the Browns’ Passing Game Different?

The Browns spread the ball across several players.

Jamari Thrash led the team with 42 receiving yards.

Gage Larvadain caught four passes for 28 yards and scored a touchdown.

David Njoku caught two passes for 20 yards.

Harold Fannin Jr. caught two passes for 16 yards and scored.

The team completed 25 passes, giving several players meaningful involvement.

This distribution also reflected the Browns’ use of multiple quarterbacks.

Flacco, Gabriel, Sanders, and Huntley all appeared in the passing statistics.

That makes individual quarterback comparisons useful, but it is equally important to examine how the entire passing rotation functioned together.

Preseason Context Matters

The game took place in Week 3 of the NFL preseason.

That distinction is important when interpreting player statistics.

Preseason games are often used to evaluate players competing for roster positions, assess depth, test combinations, and prepare selected starters without exposing the entire roster to extended workloads.

The Rams did not play Matthew Stafford, while several other notable Los Angeles players were listed as not playing.

Cleveland also had several established players unavailable.

As a result, the statistical leaders from this game should not automatically be interpreted as full-season projections.

A player can have an excellent preseason performance without receiving the same workload during the regular season.

Likewise, a player with limited statistics may simply have been protected from unnecessary preseason exposure.

Key Statistical Takeaways

The most useful takeaways from Los Angeles Rams vs Cleveland Browns match player stats are not limited to the leading passer or rusher.

1. Winn produced the Rams’ strongest passing numbers

Winn finished with 190 yards, one touchdown, no interceptions and a 105.3 rating.

2. Cleveland’s quarterbacks combined for two touchdown passes

Flacco and Gabriel each threw one touchdown.

3. The Rams dominated the rushing yardage comparison

Los Angeles ran for 99 yards compared with Cleveland’s 85.

4. Third down favored Cleveland

The Browns converted five of 13 third downs, while Los Angeles converted only one of 12.

5. Los Angeles generated more sacks

The Rams recorded six sacks compared with four for Cleveland.

6. Cleveland created more quarterback hits

The Browns recorded 10 quarterback hits compared with four for the Rams.

7. No interceptions were thrown

Neither team produced an interception.

8. Both teams protected their fumbles

Los Angeles recovered both of its fumbles, while Cleveland recovered its only fumble.

9. Jordan Waters supplied the Rams’ rushing touchdown

Waters finished with 42 yards on six carries and scored on a two-yard run.

10. Cleveland won with a late field goal

Andre Szmyt converted a 37-yard field goal as time expired, giving Cleveland the 19-17 victory.

Final Statistical Comparison

Category	Los Angeles Rams	Cleveland Browns
Final Score	17	19
Total Net Yards	268	256
First Downs	14	22
Rushing Yards	99	85
Net Passing Yards	169	171
Gross Passing Yards	190	221
Passing TDs	1	2
Interceptions	0	0
Sacks Made	6	4
QB Hits	4	10
Third Down	1/12	5/13
Red Zone	2/2	2/4
Fumbles	2	1
Fumbles Lost	0	0
Time of Possession	28:59	31:01

The comparison shows why the final score cannot be explained simply by total yardage.

Los Angeles gained more total net yards and more rushing yards.

Cleveland had more first downs, more net passing yards, more passing touchdowns, better third-down efficiency, and more quarterback hits.

Those differences created a narrow statistical path to a 19-17 victory.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who won the Rams vs Browns preseason game in 2025?

The Cleveland Browns defeated the Los Angeles Rams 19-17 on August 23, 2025, at Huntington Bank Field in Cleveland.

Who was the Rams’ leading passer?

Dresser Winn led the Rams with 15 completions on 23 attempts for 190 yards, one touchdown and no interceptions.

Who was the Browns’ leading passer?

Dillon Gabriel led Cleveland in passing yards with 129 on 12 completions from 19 attempts. Joe Flacco added 71 yards and one touchdown on 9-of-10 passing.

Who led the Rams in rushing?

Jordan Waters led Los Angeles with 42 rushing yards on six carries and scored one touchdown.

Who led the Rams in receiving?

Brennan Presley led the Rams with 51 receiving yards on three catches. Terrance Ferguson added 48 yards on two receptions.

Did either team throw an interception?

No. Neither Los Angeles nor Cleveland threw an interception in the game.

Conclusion

Los Angeles Rams vs Cleveland Browns match player stats from the August 23, 2025 preseason finale show a game that was much closer statistically than the simple box score might suggest.

Los Angeles finished with 268 total net yards, including 99 rushing yards and 169 net passing yards. Dresser Winn completed 15 of 23 passes for 190 yards, one touchdown and no interceptions. Jordan Waters led the rushing attack with 42 yards and a touchdown, while Brennan Presley produced 51 receiving yards.

Cleveland finished with 256 total net yards, but the Browns recorded 22 first downs and converted five of 13 third downs. Their quarterbacks combined for 25 completions, 221 gross passing yards, two touchdowns and zero interceptions. Joe Flacco was especially efficient in his limited appearance, while Dillon Gabriel delivered a touchdown without taking a sack.

Defensively, the Rams recorded six sacks, while Cleveland produced four sacks and 10 quarterback hits. Neither team forced an interception, and neither team lost a fumble.

The most important statistical contrast was third-down efficiency. Los Angeles converted only one of 12 attempts, while Cleveland converted five of 13. That difference helped the Browns sustain more drives and produce 22 first downs despite finishing with fewer total net yards.

Ultimately, the 19-17 result was decided by Cleveland’s final scoring opportunity. Andre Szmyt converted a 37-yard field goal as time expired, completing a preseason game in which both teams showed productive individual performances but very different levels of situational efficiency.

For readers studying the game beyond the final score, the numbers provide a clear lesson: total yardage, passing production, rushing efficiency, pressure, third-down conversion and red-zone execution all need to be considered together when evaluating a close NFL matchup.