Timberwolves vs Houston Rockets Match Player Stats

The timberwolves vs houston rockets match player stats from January 17, 2026, tell the story of a tightly contested game decided by Houston’s stronger fourth quarter. The Rockets defeated the Minnesota Timberwolves 110-105 at Toyota Center in Houston, with both teams producing a 39-point individual scoring performance from Kevin Durant and Julius Randle.

The game was competitive throughout. Minnesota led 34-29 after the opening quarter, but Houston responded in the second and third periods before closing the game with a 29-point fourth quarter. The final five-point margin reflected how little separated the teams overall.

Game Overview

The January 17 matchup took place at Toyota Center in Houston, Texas, in front of 18,055 fans. Houston entered the game with a 24-15 record and an impressive 13-3 home mark. Minnesota was 27-15 overall and 12-9 on the road.

Houston ultimately prevailed 110-105.

Category	Minnesota Timberwolves	Houston Rockets
Final Score	105	110
Field Goals	37-80	39-84
Field Goal %	46%	46%
Three-Pointers	11-30	12-28
Three-Point %	37%	43%
Free Throws	20-35	20-34
Free Throw %	57%	59%
Rebounds	45	42
Assists	21	19
Turnovers	14	12
Steals	7	10
Blocks	7	5

The basic shooting numbers were remarkably close. Both teams shot 46% from the field, while Minnesota had a three-rebound advantage and two more assists.

The biggest statistical differences came from Houston’s 43% three-point shooting, its 10 steals, and its lower turnover total.

Timberwolves vs Houston Rockets Match Player Stats

The timberwolves vs houston rockets match player stats are particularly interesting because the two leading scorers finished with exactly 39 points.

Kevin Durant scored 39 for Houston, while Julius Randle scored 39 for Minnesota. Their paths to those totals were different, making the individual comparison one of the central statistical stories of the game.

Kevin Durant

Durant produced an efficient offensive performance:

• 39 points
• 11-18 field goals
• 6-8 three-pointers
• 11-14 free throws
• 4 rebounds
• 7 assists
• 5 turnovers
• 2 steals
• 1 block
• +15 plus/minus

His 6-for-8 shooting from three was particularly important. Durant accounted for 18 points from beyond the arc alone, giving Houston a major source of efficient scoring.

His seven assists also show that his contribution extended beyond scoring. He combined high-volume scoring with playmaking, although his five turnovers were a negative in an otherwise strong statistical line.

Julius Randle

Randle matched Durant’s 39-point total for Minnesota:

• 39 points
• 14-25 field goals
• 2-5 three-pointers
• 9-11 free throws
• 4 rebounds
• 2 assists
• 5 turnovers
• 1 block
• -12 plus/minus

Randle’s 14 made field goals were four more than Durant’s 11, but he needed 25 attempts compared with Durant’s 18.

That distinction matters when evaluating efficiency. Durant’s outside shooting and free-throw production helped him reach the same scoring total with considerably fewer field-goal attempts.

Randle nevertheless carried a substantial offensive load and was responsible for more than one-third of Minnesota’s 105 points.

Houston Rockets Player Stats

Houston’s offense was led by Durant and Alperen Sengun, while Reed Sheppard provided an important contribution from the bench.

Alperen Sengun

Sengun recorded:

• 25 points
• 11-22 field goals
• 0-1 from three
• 3-9 free throws
• 14 rebounds
• 3 assists
• 4 turnovers
• 1 steal
• 1 block
• -7 plus/minus

His 14 rebounds were the highest total by any player in the game.

Sengun’s offensive production complemented Durant’s perimeter scoring. While Durant created major value from outside, Sengun did most of his damage through two-point scoring and rebounding.

Amen Thompson

Thompson finished with:

• 14 points
• 5-12 field goals
• 1-3 three-pointers
• 3-4 free throws
• 7 rebounds
• 4 assists
• 3 turnovers
• 1 steal
• +7 plus/minus

His seven rebounds and four assists made his contribution broader than his 14-point scoring total suggests.

Reed Sheppard

Sheppard was Houston’s standout bench scorer:

• 14 points
• 5-9 field goals
• 4-6 three-pointers
• 2 assists
• 2 steals
• +11 plus/minus

His four made three-pointers were particularly valuable. Sheppard converted 66.7% of his attempts from beyond the arc, providing efficient perimeter production away from Houston’s primary scorers.

Jabari Smith Jr.

Smith recorded:

• 9 points
• 3-12 field goals
• 1-4 three-pointers
• 2-5 free throws
• 5 rebounds
• 2 assists
• 3 blocks
• -5 plus/minus

Although his shooting was less efficient than Houston would have wanted, his three blocks were a significant defensive contribution.

Jae’Sean Tate

Tate finished with four points on perfect 2-for-2 shooting. He also had three rebounds and one steal, finishing at +2.

Clint Capela

Capela also scored four points, making both of his field-goal attempts. He added three rebounds, one assist, one steal, and finished at +8.

Dorian Finney-Smith

Finney-Smith did not score, going 0-for-1 from the field and 0-for-1 from three. He recorded three rebounds and one steal.

JD Davison

Davison finished scoreless on 0-for-2 shooting, with one rebound. He also went 0-for-2 from three.

Minnesota Timberwolves Player Stats

Minnesota received huge scoring numbers from Randle and Naz Reid, while Rudy Gobert controlled the glass.

Naz Reid

Reid was Minnesota’s second-leading scorer with 25 points:

• 25 points
• 8-11 field goals
• 5-7 three-pointers
• 4-5 free throws
• 9 rebounds
• 4 assists
• 2 turnovers
• 1 steal
• 1 block
• 0 plus/minus

His five made three-pointers were especially significant. Reid combined efficient inside scoring with outstanding perimeter shooting.

He also nearly recorded a double-double, finishing with nine rebounds.

Rudy Gobert

Gobert supplied Minnesota’s strongest rebounding performance:

• 10 points
• 4-7 field goals
• 2-10 free throws
• 13 rebounds
• 1 assist
• 2 turnovers
• 2 steals
• 2 blocks
• -3 plus/minus

His 13 rebounds were second only to Sengun’s 14 among the game’s individual players.

The free-throw line was the obvious statistical weakness. Gobert made only two of 10 attempts, leaving eight points at the line.

Jaden McDaniels

McDaniels finished with:

• 15 points
• 5-14 field goals
• 1-4 three-pointers
• 4-5 free throws
• 7 rebounds
• 4 assists
• 1 turnover
• 2 steals
• 2 blocks
• -5 plus/minus

His defensive activity stood out through two steals and two blocks.

Donte DiVincenzo

DiVincenzo contributed:

• 8 points
• 3-10 field goals
• 2-7 three-pointers
• 8 rebounds
• 4 assists
• 2 turnovers
• 1 steal
• 1 block
• +5 plus/minus

The eight rebounds and four assists were valuable supplementary contributions.

Mike Conley

Conley recorded:

• 6 points
• 2-8 field goals
• 1-5 three-pointers
• 1-2 free throws
• 1 rebound
• 1 assist
• 1 turnover
• 1 steal
• +8 plus/minus

Although his scoring was limited, his positive plus/minus indicates that Minnesota’s team scoring margin improved while he was on the court.

Josh Okogie

Okogie scored one point on 0-for-4 shooting and 0-for-3 from three. He added two rebounds and one steal and finished at +2.

Quarter-by-Quarter Breakdown

The game changed direction several times.

Quarter	Timberwolves	Rockets
1st	34	29
2nd	21	24
3rd	27	28
4th	23	29
Total	105	110

First Quarter

Minnesota opened with 34 points, its highest-scoring quarter of the game. Houston scored 29.

The five-point Minnesota advantage established an early lead but did not create much separation.

Second Quarter

Houston answered with a 24-21 advantage.

The Rockets cut into Minnesota’s lead by three points, leaving the game much closer entering halftime.

Third Quarter

The third quarter remained tight, with Houston scoring 28 and Minnesota scoring 27.

Houston therefore entered the final period with a narrow advantage created by its second- and third-quarter production.

Fourth Quarter

The decisive period belonged to Houston.

The Rockets scored 29 points compared with Minnesota’s 23, creating the final five-point margin.

That closing stretch is important when interpreting the box score. Minnesota’s overall shooting percentage was identical to Houston’s, but the Rockets produced the stronger final-quarter result.

How the Shooting Numbers Shaped the Game

One of the most useful ways to analyze this matchup is to separate total field-goal percentage from shot distribution.

Both teams finished at 46% from the field:

• Minnesota: 37-of-80
• Houston: 39-of-84

That means Houston made only two more field goals despite taking four additional attempts.

The bigger difference came from three-point efficiency.

Minnesota shot 11-of-30 from three, or 37%.

Houston shot 12-of-28, or 43%.

That difference may look modest, but three-point efficiency matters significantly in a five-point game. Houston’s 12 made threes produced 36 points from beyond the arc.

Minnesota’s 11 made threes produced 33 points.

The Rockets therefore gained three points from made three-pointers alone.

Free Throws Were Also Important

Minnesota and Houston attempted almost identical numbers of free throws.

Minnesota:

• 20 makes
• 35 attempts
• 57%

Houston:

• 20 makes
• 34 attempts
• 59%

Neither team made more free throws than the other.

However, Minnesota’s 57% conversion rate left more potential points unused.

Gobert’s 2-for-10 shooting at the line was the most obvious example. His 10 attempts produced only two points.

This is particularly relevant in a game decided by five points.

Rebounding Comparison

Minnesota actually won the overall rebounding battle.

The Timberwolves collected 45 rebounds compared with Houston’s 42.

But Houston’s Sengun led all players individually with 14.

Minnesota’s Gobert followed with 13, while Reid had nine and DiVincenzo had eight.

The rebounding totals therefore show that Houston did not win because it dominated the glass. Instead, its advantage came from other areas, particularly three-point accuracy, steals, turnovers, and late-game scoring.

Turnovers and Defensive Pressure

Houston committed 12 turnovers compared with Minnesota’s 14.

The difference was only two possessions, but Houston also recorded 10 steals compared with Minnesota’s seven.

That combination indicates greater defensive disruption from Houston in the recorded box score.

Minnesota had seven blocks compared with Houston’s five, so the Timberwolves still generated substantial defensive activity around the rim.

The defensive profile was therefore different rather than one-sided:

• Minnesota had more rebounds and blocks.
• Houston had more steals.
• Houston committed fewer turnovers.

Plus/Minus: An Important Contextual Stat

Plus/minus measures the team’s net point differential while a player is on the court.

The game’s plus/minus figures provide useful context but should not be treated as a standalone measure of individual performance.

Durant finished at +15, while Sheppard was +11.

Among Minnesota players, Conley was +8 and DiVincenzo was +5.

Randle, despite scoring 39 points, finished at -12.

That does not mean Randle’s scoring was unimportant. Rather, it shows that individual scoring totals and the team’s scoring margin during a player’s minutes measure different things.

What the Box Score Reveals About the Matchup

The timberwolves vs houston rockets match player stats reveal several important patterns.

1. Both Teams Had a 39-Point Leader

Durant and Randle each scored 39.

That creates a rare statistical symmetry in which neither team had an advantage in top-end individual scoring.

The difference was what surrounded those performances.

Houston had Sengun with 25 points and Sheppard with 14. Minnesota had Reid with 25 and McDaniels with 15.

2. Houston Had the More Efficient Perimeter Shooting

The Rockets made 12 of 28 three-point attempts.

Minnesota made 11 of 30.

The percentage difference was 43% versus 37%.

Durant’s 6-of-8 shooting from three was the clearest individual example.

3. Minnesota Won the Rebounding Battle

Minnesota collected 45 rebounds.

Houston collected 42.

Gobert and Reid provided significant work on the boards, while Sengun’s 14-rebound performance kept Houston competitive inside.

4. Houston Protected the Ball Better

Houston had 12 turnovers.

Minnesota had 14.

In a five-point game, two additional turnovers can matter, particularly when combined with Houston’s three additional steals.

5. The Fourth Quarter Decided the Result

Minnesota scored 23 points in the fourth.

Houston scored 29.

The six-point fourth-quarter difference was larger than the final five-point margin.

That makes the closing period one of the clearest statistical explanations for Houston’s victory.

Individual Statistical Leaders

Statistical Category	Player	Team	Total
Points	Kevin Durant	Houston	39
Points	Julius Randle	Minnesota	39
Rebounds	Alperen Sengun	Houston	14
Rebounds	Rudy Gobert	Minnesota	13
Assists	Kevin Durant	Houston	7
Assists	Mike Conley	Minnesota	1
Assists	Naz Reid	Minnesota	4
Three-Pointers Made	Kevin Durant	Houston	6
Three-Pointers Made	Naz Reid	Minnesota	5
Blocks	Jabari Smith Jr.	Houston	3
Blocks	Jaden McDaniels	Minnesota	2
Blocks	Rudy Gobert	Minnesota	2
Steals	Several	Both	2

The assist data requires careful reading because the supplied player data shows Durant leading Houston with seven assists, while Minnesota’s listed leaders are Conley and Reid with four assists for Reid and one for Conley in the supplied individual lines. For accuracy, the team and player figures should always be checked against the official box score when publishing a statistical article.

Bench Production

Bench scoring can be a deciding factor in close games.

Minnesota’s biggest bench contribution came from Naz Reid, who scored 25 points and grabbed nine rebounds.

Houston received 14 points from Reed Sheppard, including four made three-pointers.

Sheppard’s shooting was particularly efficient. He made five of nine field-goal attempts and four of six from three.

That gave Houston a reliable source of perimeter scoring away from Durant and Sengun.

Season Series Context

At the time of the displayed January 17 matchup, Houston led the season series 1-0.

The listed later meetings provide additional context:

• Game 2: Houston at Minnesota on March 26, with Houston winning 110-108 in overtime.
• Game 3: Minnesota at Houston on April 11, with Minnesota winning 136-132.

These results show that the season series contained multiple close games, including a two-point overtime result and a four-point game.

For a historical article, it is useful to keep the January 17 box score separate from later meetings rather than combining statistics from different games.

What Readers Should Look At When Comparing Player Stats

A box score provides much more information than the leading scorer.

When analyzing a game like this, look at several categories together:

1. Scoring efficiency: Compare points with field-goal attempts.
2. Three-point shooting: Check both volume and percentage.
3. Free throws: Examine both attempts and conversion rate.
4. Rebounding: Separate team totals from individual leaders.
5. Playmaking: Look at assists alongside turnovers.
6. Defensive activity: Consider steals and blocks.
7. Plus/minus: Use it as contextual information rather than a standalone grade.
8. Quarter scoring: Identify when the game actually changed.

This approach gives a more complete picture than simply asking who scored the most points.

Why the Five-Point Margin Matters

The final score was 110-105, meaning Houston won by five.

That margin was small enough that several statistical details become relevant.

Minnesota had:

• Three more rebounds
• Two more assists
• Seven blocks versus Houston’s five
• 14 turnovers

Houston had:

• Two more made field goals
• One more made three-pointer
• Better three-point percentage
• Better free-throw percentage
• Two fewer turnovers
• Three more steals

Neither team dominated every statistical category.

Instead, Houston accumulated several smaller advantages that collectively produced the victory.

A Practical Reading of the Box Score

If you only look at scoring, the game appears almost perfectly balanced.

Durant: 39.

Randle: 39.

Sengun: 25.

Reid: 25.

But the complete box score tells a more detailed story.

Durant’s 6-of-8 three-point shooting helped Houston generate efficient offense. Sengun’s 14 rebounds gave the Rockets a strong interior presence. Sheppard added four three-pointers from the bench.

For Minnesota, Randle’s 39 points kept the offense competitive, while Reid’s 25 points on 8-of-11 shooting gave the Timberwolves another highly efficient scoring option. Gobert’s 13 rebounds and seven total team blocks helped Minnesota compete defensively.

The difference was not one isolated statistic. It was the combination of several small advantages, particularly Houston’s perimeter shooting and fourth-quarter production.

Visual and Media Suggestions

For publication, an original visual package could make the statistical information easier to understand. Useful options include:

• A player scoring comparison showing Durant and Randle at 39 points.
• A shooting-efficiency graphic comparing the teams’ field-goal, three-point, and free-throw percentages.
• A quarter-by-quarter scoring chart showing Houston’s fourth-quarter advantage.
• A player comparison graphic featuring Durant, Randle, Sengun, and Reid.
• A compact team-stat infographic covering rebounds, assists, turnovers, steals, and blocks.

These visuals should be based on the verified game data and should add information rather than simply repeat the article’s headings.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who scored the most points in the Timberwolves vs Rockets game?

Kevin Durant and Julius Randle were the leading scorers, with each player scoring 39 points.

How many points did Kevin Durant score?

Kevin Durant scored 39 points on 11-of-18 shooting from the field, including 6-of-8 from three-point range.

How many points did Julius Randle score?

Julius Randle scored 39 points on 14-of-25 shooting from the field and 9-of-11 from the free-throw line.

Who had the most rebounds?

Alperen Sengun led all players with 14 rebounds. Rudy Gobert was Minnesota’s leading rebounder with 13.

Who won the January 17, 2026 game?

The Houston Rockets defeated the Minnesota Timberwolves 110-105 at Toyota Center.

What was the biggest statistical difference between the teams?

Houston shot 43% from three-point range compared with Minnesota’s 37%, while also committing two fewer turnovers and recording three more steals.

Conclusion

The timberwolves vs houston rockets match player stats from January 17, 2026, describe a competitive 110-105 Houston victory in which both teams received 39-point performances from their leading scorers.

Kevin Durant combined 39 points with seven assists and highly efficient three-point shooting, while Alperen Sengun added 25 points and a game-high 14 rebounds. Reed Sheppard supplied important bench scoring with 14 points and four made threes.

Minnesota was led by Julius Randle’s 39 points and Naz Reid’s 25 points. Reid also contributed nine rebounds and four assists, while Rudy Gobert collected 13 rebounds and two blocks.

The teams were equal in field-goal percentage at 46%, and Minnesota actually finished with more rebounds. Houston’s advantages came through better three-point efficiency, fewer turnovers, more steals, and a stronger fourth quarter.

For readers studying the timberwolves vs houston rockets match player stats, the key lesson is that the final score cannot be fully explained by the leading scorers alone. The complete box score shows how shooting efficiency, ball security, defensive pressure, rebounding, and late-game execution combined to produce Houston’s five-point win.