76ers vs Knicks Match Player Stats
76ers vs Knicks Match Player Stats: Full Game Breakdown
The 76ers vs knicks match player stats from the January 4, 2026 matchup provide a detailed picture of how Philadelphia defeated New York 130-119 at Madison Square Garden. The game featured major scoring performances from Tyrese Maxey, Joel Embiid, VJ Edgecombe, Jalen Brunson, and Karl-Anthony Towns, while Philadelphia’s stronger shooting efficiency and consistent scoring across all four quarters proved important.
Philadelphia entered the matchup with a 19-14 record and a 10-6 mark on the road, while New York was 23-12 overall and 15-4 at home. Despite the Knicks having the stronger record and home-court advantage, the 76ers controlled the scoreboard throughout most of the contest.
For anyone researching 76ers vs knicks match player stats, the most important headline is simple: Tyrese Maxey led all scorers with 36 points, while Joel Embiid and VJ Edgecombe each scored 26. On the New York side, Jalen Brunson produced 31 points, Karl-Anthony Towns recorded 23 points and 14 rebounds, and OG Anunoby added 19 points.
The official NBA game record lists the contest as a 130-119 Philadelphia victory at Madison Square Garden, with Philadelphia scoring 31, 35, 33, and 31 points across the four quarters.
76ers vs knicks match player stats
The clearest way to understand the game is to look beyond the final score. Philadelphia did not simply win because one player had a big night. The 76ers produced strong shooting numbers, received multiple high-level scoring performances, and maintained an advantage on the glass.
Final score and quarter breakdown
| Quarter | Philadelphia 76ers | New York Knicks |
| 1st | 31 | 30 |
| 2nd | 35 | 28 |
| 3rd | 33 | 29 |
| 4th | 31 | 32 |
| Final | 130 | 119 |
Philadelphia outscored New York in each of the first three quarters.
That pattern mattered.
The Knicks actually scored 32 points in the fourth quarter, which was more than Philadelphia’s 31. However, by that point, the 76ers had already created enough separation to protect their lead.
The second quarter was especially important. Philadelphia scored 35 points while New York managed 28, giving the 76ers a seven-point advantage in the period. That margin helped Philadelphia enter halftime with a 66-58 lead.
The third quarter extended the difference further. Philadelphia scored 33 points compared with 29 from New York, meaning the Knicks entered the final quarter facing a significant deficit.
Tyrese Maxey leads Philadelphia with 36 points
Tyrese Maxey was the standout scorer in the matchup.
He finished with 36 points, making him the game’s leading scorer. His performance was particularly important because Philadelphia did not need to rely exclusively on Joel Embiid for offensive production.
Maxey’s scoring gave the 76ers a perimeter threat capable of putting pressure on New York’s defense throughout the game.
His 36-point performance also fits an important pattern in the box score. Philadelphia had three players score at least 26 points, creating a balanced offensive attack rather than a one-player scoring effort.
When examining 76ers vs knicks match player stats, Maxey’s 36 points are the natural starting point, but the supporting production around him explains why the 76ers were able to reach 130 points.
Joel Embiid delivers a double-double
Joel Embiid finished with 26 points and 10 rebounds, producing a double-double in the matchup.
His rebounding was particularly valuable because New York had a strong interior presence through Karl-Anthony Towns and Mitchell Robinson.
Embiid also shot efficiently from the field. The official box score records him at 9 made field goals on 15 attempts, or 60 percent from the field. He also converted 8 of 12 free throws.
His contribution was not limited to scoring.
With 10 rebounds and five assists in the official box score, Embiid affected several areas of the game. Philadelphia could use him as a scorer, rebounder, and passing hub while Maxey created pressure from the perimeter.
That combination made the 76ers difficult to defend for long stretches.
VJ Edgecombe adds 26 points
VJ Edgecombe was another major contributor for Philadelphia.
He scored 26 points, matching Embiid’s total and giving Philadelphia a third high-output scorer alongside Maxey.
This was an important part of the offensive structure. When Maxey was producing from the perimeter and Embiid was operating inside, Edgecombe added another scoring option that New York had to account for.
For a team trying to win on the road, having multiple players capable of reaching 20-plus points can reduce the pressure placed on a single offensive player.
Edgecombe’s 26-point performance therefore belongs near the top of any meaningful analysis of this game.
Paul George provides playmaking value
Paul George scored 15 points and led Philadelphia in assists with 6.
His scoring total was lower than the three leading Philadelphia scorers, but his playmaking helped connect the different parts of the offense.
George also contributed eight rebounds and two blocks according to the official box score.
The six assists are particularly useful when examining the broader team statistics.
Philadelphia finished with 25 assists, compared with 23 for New York. That two-assist difference was not enormous, but it reflected Philadelphia’s ability to generate scoring through multiple players rather than relying entirely on individual shot creation.
Jalen Brunson leads the Knicks with 31 points
Jalen Brunson was New York’s leading scorer with 31 points.
His production kept the Knicks competitive despite Philadelphia’s offensive efficiency.
A 31-point performance normally represents a major offensive contribution, but the surrounding numbers explain why it was not enough to produce a New York victory.
Philadelphia had three players reach at least 26 points, while New York’s next major scorer behind Brunson was Karl-Anthony Towns with 23.
Brunson therefore carried a large portion of the Knicks’ scoring responsibility.
The official NBA game record also identifies Brunson’s 31-point performance among the game’s leading individual efforts.
Karl-Anthony Towns controls the glass
Karl-Anthony Towns finished with 23 points and 14 rebounds, giving New York its strongest rebounding performance from an individual player.
His 14 rebounds were the highest total recorded by either team’s leading individual rebounders.
Towns’ performance is important because the Knicks did not lose the rebounding battle by a huge margin. New York finished with 44 rebounds, only three fewer than Philadelphia’s 47.
That means the result cannot simply be explained by Philadelphia dominating the boards.
Instead, the difference was more closely connected to shooting efficiency, scoring distribution, and turnovers.
OG Anunoby contributes across the stat sheet
OG Anunoby scored 19 points and led New York in assists alongside Mikal Bridges, with 6 assists each.
His six assists demonstrate that his contribution extended beyond scoring.
Anunoby also served as one of New York’s important two-way pieces during a game in which Philadelphia consistently created scoring opportunities.
His 19 points placed him behind Brunson and Towns among the Knicks’ leading scorers, but his passing numbers helped the Knicks generate offense from more than one source.
Mikal Bridges provides six assists
Mikal Bridges also finished with 6 assists.
That tied him with Anunoby for the Knicks’ team lead in assists.
Bridges scored 12 points according to the supplied game data, but his passing role was important in helping New York produce 23 total assists.
The contrast between individual scoring and playmaking is worth remembering when reading a box score. A player does not need to be among the leading scorers to have a meaningful offensive role.
Team shooting tells the bigger story
The most significant statistical difference between the teams was shooting efficiency.
Philadelphia finished:
- 49-of-90 from the field
- 54 percent field-goal shooting
- 17-of-36 from three-point range
- 47 percent three-point shooting
- 15-of-23 from the free-throw line
- 65 percent free-throw shooting
New York finished:
- 38-of-89 from the field
- 43 percent field-goal shooting
- 16-of-40 from three-point range
- 40 percent three-point shooting
- 27-of-32 from the free-throw line
- 84 percent free-throw shooting
The difference in overall field-goal percentage is striking.
Philadelphia converted 54 percent of its field-goal attempts, compared with 43 percent for New York.
That is an 11-percentage-point gap.
The Knicks partially compensated by shooting 84 percent at the free-throw line, compared with Philadelphia’s 65 percent. New York also attempted nine more free throws.
However, the 76ers’ superior field-goal efficiency and strong three-point shooting helped them generate enough offense to reach 130 points.
Three-point shooting helped Philadelphia create separation
Philadelphia made 17 three-pointers on 36 attempts, good for 47 percent.
New York made 16 three-pointers on 40 attempts, or 40 percent.
The difference was only one made three-pointer, but Philadelphia achieved that total on four fewer attempts.
That indicates a more efficient perimeter shooting night.
Three-point shooting can dramatically change the structure of an NBA game because successful long-range attempts produce three points while also stretching the defense.
Philadelphia’s 47 percent accuracy from beyond the arc meant New York had to deal with both perimeter scoring and Embiid’s interior presence.
Philadelphia won the scoring efficiency battle
A useful way to read this matchup is to compare the number of field goals made.
Philadelphia made 49 field goals.
New York made 38.
That is an 11-field-goal difference.
The Knicks made more free throws, 27 compared with Philadelphia’s 15, but the 11 additional made field goals for Philadelphia created a major scoring advantage.
The final score reflects that balance.
Philadelphia scored 130 points despite making fewer free throws because its field-goal production was much stronger.
This is one of the clearest lessons from the game for readers analyzing player statistics: the free-throw line alone does not tell the full offensive story.
Rebounding was relatively close
Philadelphia recorded 47 rebounds, while New York had 44.
The 76ers therefore held a three-rebound advantage.
That is meaningful, but it was not large enough to explain a 11-point final margin by itself.
Towns’ 14 rebounds led the Knicks, while Embiid’s 10 led Philadelphia.
The team totals show that both clubs competed effectively on the glass.
For Philadelphia, the important point was that it paired a small rebounding edge with much better shooting efficiency.
Philadelphia produced more assists
The 76ers recorded 25 assists, compared with 23 for the Knicks.
The difference was modest.
Still, Philadelphia’s assist total shows that its 130 points came from an offense involving several contributors.
Paul George led the team with six assists, while Embiid also contributed five.
New York received six assists each from Anunoby and Bridges.
The numbers suggest that both teams had multiple playmakers, but Philadelphia converted its possessions into points more efficiently.
Turnovers favored Philadelphia
Turnovers were another meaningful difference.
Philadelphia committed 13 turnovers, while New York committed 16.
That gave the 76ers a three-turnover advantage.
Turnovers matter because every lost possession can remove an opportunity to score while potentially giving the opponent a transition chance.
The Knicks also had 16 turnovers despite recording nine steals, compared with seven steals for Philadelphia.
That creates an interesting statistical contrast. New York generated more steals but still finished with more turnovers overall.
Philadelphia’s lower turnover count helped it maintain offensive consistency.
Defensive statistics show Philadelphia’s interior impact
Philadelphia recorded 10 blocks, compared with only 2 for New York.
That eight-block difference is substantial.
The 76ers also recorded seven steals, while New York had nine.
The defensive profile therefore looked different for each team.
New York generated more steals, but Philadelphia produced significantly more blocks.
The block total highlights the defensive impact of Philadelphia’s frontcourt and suggests that the 76ers were able to contest shots around the basket effectively.
The game changed during the second quarter
The second quarter was a turning point.
Philadelphia scored 35 points in the period, while New York scored 28.
The 76ers entered halftime with a 66-58 lead.
A key feature of the game was Philadelphia’s ability to respond when New York made scoring runs.
The Knicks could create momentum, but Philadelphia repeatedly restored its advantage.
This is important when interpreting the player stats. A high scoring total does not always mean that a player dominated every possession. Basketball games often shift through short runs, defensive adjustments, and changes in shot quality.
The team that responds better to those changes can create separation even when the opposing star players are also producing.
Philadelphia built a significant third-quarter advantage
The 76ers continued their strong offensive performance after halftime.
They scored 33 points in the third quarter compared with 29 from New York.
That extended Philadelphia’s lead before the final period.
The supplied game data records Philadelphia’s largest lead as part of a game in which the Knicks repeatedly attempted to reduce the deficit.
This sequence demonstrates why the final 130-119 score should not be interpreted as a comfortable wire-to-wire result.
New York remained capable of scoring in the fourth quarter, but Philadelphia had already created enough margin through the second and third quarters.
New York showed resistance in the fourth quarter
The Knicks scored 32 points in the fourth quarter, one more than Philadelphia.
That was their strongest quarter of the game.
The improved fourth-quarter output demonstrates that New York continued competing offensively instead of allowing the game to become a one-sided finish.
However, the 11-point deficit entering the final stage was difficult to erase.
Philadelphia scored 31 points in the fourth quarter and maintained enough offensive production to prevent a complete comeback.
This is another reason the quarter-by-quarter breakdown is valuable when studying 76ers vs knicks match player stats.
The final score gives the result, but the quarter totals explain how the result developed.
Philadelphia’s starting lineup
The supplied starting lineup for Philadelphia was:
- Paul George
- Dominick Barlow
- Joel Embiid
- Tyrese Maxey
- VJ Edgecombe
This group combined veteran experience, interior scoring, perimeter creation, and young athleticism.
Maxey and Edgecombe supplied major scoring production, while Embiid provided interior offense and rebounding.
George added playmaking and two-way contributions.
Dominick Barlow also contributed five points and two rebounds in 14:11 of playing time according to the official box score.
New York’s starting lineup
The supplied Knicks starting lineup was:
- OG Anunoby
- Karl-Anthony Towns
- Mitchell Robinson
- Mikal Bridges
- Jalen Brunson
The lineup featured several players capable of contributing in different areas.
Brunson handled a major portion of the scoring responsibility.
Towns provided scoring and rebounding.
Anunoby and Bridges contributed both scoring and playmaking.
Robinson’s interior presence added another defensive and rebounding element.
Yet Philadelphia’s overall shooting efficiency proved difficult for New York to overcome.
What the player stats reveal about the matchup
A box score becomes much more useful when the numbers are connected.
Several themes stand out.
1. Philadelphia had three major scoring outlets
Maxey scored 36.
Embiid scored 26.
Edgecombe scored 26.
Together, those three players accounted for 88 points.
That gave Philadelphia multiple ways to attack the Knicks.
2. New York relied heavily on Brunson and Towns
Brunson scored 31.
Towns scored 23.
Together, they produced 54 points.
Their combined production was strong, but Philadelphia’s top three scorers produced considerably more.
3. Shooting efficiency favored Philadelphia
The 54 percent field-goal percentage for Philadelphia compared with 43 percent for New York was one of the most important statistical differences.
4. New York was more efficient at the free-throw line
The Knicks converted 84 percent of their free throws.
Philadelphia converted 65 percent.
This prevented the shooting gap from becoming even more damaging.
5. Philadelphia protected possessions slightly better
The 76ers committed three fewer turnovers.
6. Philadelphia generated much more rim protection
The 10-2 block difference was one of the strongest defensive statistical contrasts in the game.
Why the final score was 130-119
The 11-point final margin came from several smaller advantages rather than one overwhelming category.
Philadelphia:
- Shot 54 percent from the field
- Made 17 three-pointers
- Recorded 47 rebounds
- Produced 25 assists
- Committed 13 turnovers
- Recorded 10 blocks
- Had three players score at least 26 points
New York:
- Shot 43 percent from the field
- Made 16 three-pointers
- Recorded 44 rebounds
- Produced 23 assists
- Committed 16 turnovers
- Recorded 2 blocks
- Had Brunson lead the team with 31 points
The comparison shows that Philadelphia’s advantage was broad.
The 76ers did not dominate every category. New York actually had the better free-throw percentage and more steals.
Instead, Philadelphia combined several moderate advantages into a decisive overall performance.
How to read these statistics correctly
Readers often look only at points when searching for match statistics.
That can miss important parts of the game.
A better approach is to examine five categories:
- Scoring: Who created the most points?
- Efficiency: How many attempts were needed to produce those points?
- Possessions: Which team protected the ball?
- Rebounding: Which team created extra opportunities?
- Defense: Which team disrupted the opponent’s shooting?
Using that framework, the matchup becomes easier to understand.
Maxey’s 36 points explain Philadelphia’s scoring leadership.
Embiid’s 10 rebounds show his interior influence.
George’s six assists demonstrate playmaking.
The team’s 54 percent shooting explains the offensive efficiency.
The 13 turnovers show relatively strong possession control.
The 10 blocks highlight Philadelphia’s defensive activity.
No single statistic tells the complete story.
76ers vs Knicks player comparison
| Category | 76ers Leader | Knicks Leader |
| Points | Tyrese Maxey, 36 | Jalen Brunson, 31 |
| Rebounds | Joel Embiid, 10 | Karl-Anthony Towns, 14 |
| Assists | Paul George, 6 | OG Anunoby / Mikal Bridges, 6 |
| Team FG% | 54% | 43% |
| Team 3PT% | 47% | 40% |
| Team FT% | 65% | 84% |
| Team Rebounds | 47 | 44 |
| Team Assists | 25 | 23 |
| Team Turnovers | 13 | 16 |
| Team Steals | 7 | 9 |
| Team Blocks | 10 | 2 |
| Final Score | 130 | 119 |
The table makes the main story easy to see.
New York had a strong individual rebounding performance from Towns and received 31 points from Brunson. Philadelphia, however, produced more scoring from its top three offensive contributors and finished with significantly better overall field-goal efficiency.
Key takeaways for readers researching the game
The most useful points from this matchup are straightforward.
Maxey was the primary scoring force
His 36 points led every player in the game.
Embiid provided a complete interior performance
His 26 points and 10 rebounds gave Philadelphia both scoring and rebounding value.
Edgecombe’s 26 points were critical
His scoring meant New York could not focus exclusively on Maxey and Embiid.
Brunson kept New York competitive
His 31 points made him the clear scoring leader for the Knicks.
Towns dominated individual rebounding
His 14 rebounds were the highest individual total in the matchup.
Philadelphia’s shooting separated the teams
The 54 percent field-goal rate was substantially higher than New York’s 43 percent.
Turnovers favored Philadelphia
The 13-16 turnover difference gave the 76ers three additional possessions relative to New York’s total.
Blocks heavily favored Philadelphia
The 10-2 advantage was one of the clearest defensive differences.
Season-series context
The supplied data records Philadelphia as leading the season series 2-0 after this game.
That context is useful because the matchup was not an isolated result within the season.
The game followed another meeting between the two teams, meaning the teams had already seen each other’s personnel and tendencies.
For readers comparing multiple meetings, the most useful approach is to examine how scoring leaders, shooting efficiency, rebounding, and turnovers changed from one game to another rather than looking only at wins and losses.
Common mistakes when analyzing NBA player stats
There are several easy mistakes to avoid when interpreting a box score.
Looking only at the leading scorer
Maxey led all players with 36 points, but Philadelphia’s win was supported by Embiid and Edgecombe scoring 26 each.
Ignoring shooting percentage
A player can score many points while taking a large number of attempts. Field-goal and three-point percentages provide important context.
Treating rebounds as the entire defensive story
Towns led all players with 14 rebounds, but Philadelphia recorded 10 blocks.
Ignoring turnovers
Three turnovers may not sound like a huge difference, but possession totals can influence a close game.
Treating the final quarter as the whole game
New York won the fourth-quarter scoring battle 32-31, yet Philadelphia had already established its advantage earlier.
Assuming the home team automatically has a statistical advantage
New York entered with a 15-4 home record, but Philadelphia still produced the stronger offensive performance in this matchup.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who scored the most points in the 76ers vs Knicks game?
Tyrese Maxey led all scorers with 36 points for Philadelphia.
How many points did Joel Embiid score against the Knicks?
Joel Embiid scored 26 points and collected 10 rebounds.
How many points did Jalen Brunson score?
Jalen Brunson scored 31 points for the New York Knicks.
Who had the most rebounds in the game?
Karl-Anthony Towns led all players with 14 rebounds.
What was the final score between Philadelphia and New York?
The Philadelphia 76ers defeated the New York Knicks 130-119.
Which team shot better from the field?
Philadelphia shot 54 percent from the field, compared with 43 percent for New York.
Conclusion
The 76ers vs knicks match player stats from this matchup show a game decided by a combination of efficient shooting, balanced scoring, possession control, and defensive activity.
Tyrese Maxey’s 36 points made him the leading scorer, while Joel Embiid added 26 points and 10 rebounds and VJ Edgecombe contributed another 26 points. Paul George supplied six assists and additional all-around production.
For New York, Jalen Brunson scored 31 points, Karl-Anthony Towns produced 23 points and 14 rebounds, and OG Anunoby added 19 points. Anunoby and Mikal Bridges each recorded six assists.
The team numbers provide even more context. Philadelphia shot 54 percent from the field and 47 percent from three-point range. The Knicks shot 43 percent overall and 40 percent from three. New York was much more accurate at the free-throw line, but Philadelphia’s field-goal efficiency helped offset that difference.
The 76ers also held small advantages in rebounds, assists, and turnovers, while their 10 blocks compared with New York’s two represented a major defensive statistical difference.
Taken together, these numbers explain how Philadelphia reached 130 points and maintained its advantage despite New York’s 32-point fourth quarter.
For readers studying the matchup, the most useful lesson is to view the box score as a complete statistical profile rather than focusing on one player’s scoring total. The combination of individual production and team efficiency provides the clearest explanation of the 130-119 result.
