los angeles rams vs philadelphia eagles match player stats
The los angeles rams vs philadelphia eagles match player stats from the NFC Divisional Playoff provide a detailed picture of how a close 28-22 game was decided. Philadelphia won despite producing only 128 gross passing yards, while Los Angeles moved the ball effectively through Matthew Stafford’s 324 passing yards. The major difference came on the ground, where Saquon Barkley produced 205 rushing yards and two touchdowns, while Jalen Hurts added 70 rushing yards and a touchdown. The game also featured heavy snow, seven Eagles sacks, five Rams sacks, two Rams turnovers, and several explosive plays that shaped the final result. (ESPN)
Los Angeles Rams vs Philadelphia Eagles Match Player Stats: Game Overview
The Rams and Eagles met in the NFC Divisional Playoffs at Lincoln Financial Field. Philadelphia entered the postseason game with a 14-3 regular-season record and an 8-1 home mark, while Los Angeles entered at 10-7 overall and 5-3 on the road. Philadelphia ultimately advanced with a 28-22 victory. (ESPN)
The game is particularly interesting from a statistical perspective because the final score does not tell the whole story.
Los Angeles gained 402 total yards, compared with 350 for Philadelphia. The Rams also recorded 18 first downs compared with 16 for the Eagles. Yet Philadelphia controlled the most important statistical area of the contest: rushing production.
The Eagles rushed for 285 yards on 34 attempts, averaging 8.4 yards per carry. The Rams managed 111 rushing yards on 21 attempts, averaging 5.3 yards per carry. (ESPN)
That difference helped Philadelphia overcome a relatively modest passing performance.
Game Snapshot
| Category | Los Angeles Rams | Philadelphia Eagles |
| Final Score | 22 | 28 |
| Total Yards | 402 | 350 |
| Passing Yards | 291 net | 65 net |
| Rushing Yards | 111 | 285 |
| First Downs | 18 | 16 |
| Third Down | 6/16 | 6/15 |
| Fourth Down | 1/2 | 1/1 |
| Turnovers | 2 | 0 |
| Sacks Allowed | 5 | 7 |
| Penalties | 3 for 30 yards | 3 for 14 yards |
| Time of Possession | 29:06 | 30:54 |
The table highlights one of the most unusual aspects of the game. Los Angeles had more total yardage, but Philadelphia’s rushing attack generated a huge advantage that compensated for the Eagles’ limited passing production. (ESPN)
Matthew Stafford’s Passing Performance
Matthew Stafford was one of the biggest statistical contributors for Los Angeles.
He completed 26 of 44 passes for 324 yards, averaging 7.4 yards per attempt. He threw two touchdown passes and did not throw an interception. His reported passer rating was 97.2, while his QBR was 49.7.
Those numbers show that Stafford was able to generate meaningful production against a strong Philadelphia defense, particularly through intermediate and deep completions.
The important distinction is between gross passing yards and net passing yards. Stafford’s 324 passing yards were reduced by five sacks for 33 yards, leaving the Rams with 291 net passing yards. (ESPN)
Stafford’s Key Numbers
| Statistic | Matthew Stafford |
| Completions | 26 |
| Attempts | 44 |
| Completion Rate | 59.1% |
| Passing Yards | 324 |
| Yards per Attempt | 7.4 |
| Touchdowns | 2 |
| Interceptions | 0 |
| Sacks | 5 |
| Sack Yards Lost | 33 |
| Passer Rating | 97.2 |
| QBR | 49.7 |
One of the clearest positives was Stafford’s ability to avoid interceptions. In a snowy playoff environment, protecting the football through the passing game was valuable.
At the same time, the five sacks mattered. Philadelphia repeatedly created pressure and prevented some drives from developing efficiently.
Jalen Hurts’ Passing Numbers
Jalen Hurts produced a very different passing line.
He completed 15 of 20 passes for 128 yards, with no touchdown passes and no interceptions. He averaged 6.4 yards per attempt and finished with a 91.2 passer rating.
The seven sacks were particularly important. Philadelphia lost 63 yards on those sacks, leaving the Eagles with only 65 net passing yards. (NFL)
That figure would normally create serious problems for an offense. Philadelphia avoided that problem because its running game was exceptionally productive.
Hurts also contributed heavily as a runner, which transformed his overall offensive impact.
Saquon Barkley Was the Statistical Difference Maker
Among all the los angeles rams vs philadelphia eagles match player stats, Saquon Barkley’s rushing performance stands out.
Barkley carried the ball 26 times for 205 yards, averaging 7.9 yards per carry. He scored two touchdowns, with a long run of 78 yards.
His performance was not based simply on accumulating short gains. Barkley repeatedly created explosive plays, including touchdown runs of 62 and 78 yards. The official play-by-play records both scoring runs. (ESPN)
Saquon Barkley Rushing Stats
| Statistic | Saquon Barkley |
| Carries | 26 |
| Rushing Yards | 205 |
| Average | 7.9 |
| Rushing TDs | 2 |
| Longest Run | 78 yards |
Barkley’s two long touchdown runs accounted for 140 yards, which is more than two-thirds of his total rushing production.
That is a crucial detail when evaluating the game. Philadelphia did not simply grind out a rushing advantage through repeated four or five-yard gains. The Eagles also produced explosive plays capable of changing the scoreboard immediately.
His 205 yards represented the majority of Philadelphia’s 285 rushing yards.
Jalen Hurts as a Rusher
Hurts added another major component to Philadelphia’s rushing attack.
He carried the ball seven times for 70 yards, averaging 10.0 yards per attempt. His longest run was 44 yards, and that run produced Philadelphia’s opening touchdown.
The first-quarter scoring play was especially important because Hurts broke free for a 44-yard touchdown run. The Eagles led 6-0 after the missed extra point. (ESPN)
Hurts Rushing Stats
| Statistic | Jalen Hurts |
| Carries | 7 |
| Rushing Yards | 70 |
| Average | 10.0 |
| Rushing TD | 1 |
| Longest Run | 44 yards |
When Barkley’s numbers are combined with Hurts’ rushing production, the Eagles received 275 rushing yards from their two primary ball carriers.
That represents nearly 97 percent of Philadelphia’s 285 team rushing yards.
Kyren Williams Led the Rams’ Rushing Attack
Kyren Williams was the Rams’ leading rusher.
He recorded 19 carries for 106 yards, averaging 5.6 yards per carry. His longest run went for 30 yards, but he did not score a rushing touchdown. (ESPN)
Williams gave Los Angeles a productive ground option, but the Rams did not receive the same level of explosive rushing production that Philadelphia received from Barkley and Hurts.
Kyren Williams Rushing Stats
| Statistic | Kyren Williams |
| Carries | 19 |
| Rushing Yards | 106 |
| Average | 5.6 |
| Touchdowns | 0 |
| Longest Run | 30 yards |
Stafford added five rushing yards on two attempts, giving the Rams 111 total rushing yards.
The contrast is clear. Los Angeles had a respectable rushing performance, but Philadelphia’s 285 yards created a 174-yard team rushing advantage.
Rams Receiving Leaders
The Rams’ passing success was spread across several players.
Puka Nacua led the team with 97 receiving yards on six receptions. Demarcus Robinson added 74 yards on three catches, while Cooper Kupp recorded five catches for 61 yards.
Tyler Higbee caught seven passes for 54 yards and a touchdown.
Rams Receiving Statistics
| Player | Receptions | Yards | TD | Long |
| Puka Nacua | 6 | 97 | 0 | 37 |
| Demarcus Robinson | 3 | 74 | 0 | 48 |
| Cooper Kupp | 5 | 61 | 0 | 30 |
| Tyler Higbee | 7 | 54 | 1 | 20 |
| Tutu Atwell | 1 | 18 | 0 | 18 |
| Jordan Whittington | 1 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
| Colby Parkinson | 2 | 9 | 1 | 5 |
| Kyren Williams | 1 | -1 | 0 | -1 |
The Rams finished with 26 receptions for 324 yards and two receiving touchdowns on 44 targets. Their team receiving average was 12.5 yards per reception. (ESPN)
Puka Nacua’s production was especially important because he consistently provided Stafford with a reliable receiving option.
Demarcus Robinson also produced an important explosive contribution. His 48-yard reception was the longest reception for either team.
Tyler Higbee and Colby Parkinson Provided the Touchdowns
The Rams’ two passing touchdowns went to tight ends.
Higbee caught a four-yard touchdown pass from Stafford in the first quarter. Later, Colby Parkinson caught a four-yard touchdown pass in the fourth quarter.
The scoring sequence shows that Los Angeles relied on its tight ends to finish two important drives. (ESPN)
That also demonstrates how the Rams’ 324 passing yards were converted into points. Los Angeles moved the ball through several receiving options rather than depending on only one player.
Eagles Receiving Production
Philadelphia’s receiving statistics were much quieter.
Dallas Goedert led the Eagles with four receptions for 56 yards. Barkley also caught four passes for 27 yards, while DeVonta Smith caught four passes for 21 yards.
A.J. Brown finished with two catches for 14 yards on seven targets.
Eagles Receiving Statistics
| Player | Receptions | Yards | TD | Long |
| Dallas Goedert | 4 | 56 | 0 | 31 |
| Saquon Barkley | 4 | 27 | 0 | 16 |
| DeVonta Smith | 4 | 21 | 0 | 7 |
| A.J. Brown | 2 | 14 | 0 | 9 |
| Kenneth Gainwell | 1 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
Philadelphia finished with just 15 receptions for 128 yards and no receiving touchdowns. (ESPN)
This is one of the clearest examples of why looking only at passing statistics can give an incomplete picture of an NFL playoff game.
The Eagles did not need a high-volume passing attack because their rushing game repeatedly generated field position and points.
Why Philadelphia’s Rushing Attack Mattered So Much
The most important statistical difference was the ground game.
Philadelphia rushed for 285 yards.
Los Angeles rushed for 111.
That is a 174-yard difference.
The Eagles averaged 8.4 yards per rushing attempt, while the Rams averaged 5.3.
This gave Philadelphia a way to move the ball even when the weather made passing more difficult.
The game was played in heavy snowfall, and the conditions affected the passing game. NFL reporting noted that the Eagles’ passing offense struggled while Barkley and the rushing attack carried much of the offensive workload. (NFL)
The conditions also help explain why Philadelphia’s passing totals should not be evaluated in isolation.
Third Down and Fourth Down Performance
Third-down efficiency was relatively close.
Los Angeles converted 6 of 16 third downs, while Philadelphia converted 6 of 15.
That means neither team dominated third-down situations.
Fourth down showed a small difference. The Rams converted one of two fourth-down attempts, while Philadelphia converted its only attempt.
These numbers suggest that the game was not decided by a massive third-down conversion gap. Instead, explosive rushing plays and turnovers played a more direct role.
Turnovers Were Critical
The Rams committed three fumbles and lost two.
Philadelphia recorded two fumbles but lost none. (ESPN)
Neither team threw an interception.
That distinction matters.
The Eagles protected the football despite the difficult conditions, while Los Angeles gave Philadelphia two lost fumbles.
In a six-point playoff game, two additional possessions can become extremely important.
The turnover margin was therefore plus two for Philadelphia.
Defensive Player Statistics
Philadelphia recorded five sacks, while Los Angeles recorded seven.
At first glance, the Rams’ seven sacks appear more impressive because they pressured Hurts frequently.
However, the Eagles compensated by producing a dominant rushing attack and protecting the football.
Philadelphia’s defense recorded:
- 60 total tackles
- 42 solo tackles
- 5 sacks
- 10 tackles for loss
- 11 passes defended
- 6 quarterback hits
- 0 interceptions
Los Angeles recorded:
- 69 total tackles
- 46 solo tackles
- 7 sacks
- 10 tackles for loss
- 2 passes defended
- 6 quarterback hits
- 0 interceptions
The defensive numbers reveal an interesting contrast. Los Angeles generated more sacks, but Philadelphia’s defense produced more passes defended and ultimately held the Rams to 22 points. (ESPN)
The Rams’ Seven Sacks on Defense
Seven sacks against an opposing quarterback are usually a major defensive achievement.
Los Angeles repeatedly pressured Hurts, contributing to Philadelphia’s 65 net passing yards.
The Rams also recorded 10 tackles for loss and six quarterback hits.
Yet those numbers did not translate into enough defensive stops to overcome Philadelphia’s running game.
The Eagles’ rushing efficiency meant that the Rams could create negative plays in the passing game while still giving up explosive plays on the ground.
Philadelphia’s Five Sacks
The Eagles recorded five sacks against Stafford.
That was fewer than the Rams’ seven sacks against Hurts, but the pressure still mattered.
Stafford’s final passing line was productive, yet five sacks cost Los Angeles 33 yards.
Without those sacks, his gross passing production would have translated into a considerably stronger net passing figure.
This is why quarterback statistics should be separated into gross passing and net passing whenever sacks are a significant factor.
Special Teams Statistics
Special teams also contributed to the overall statistical picture.
Rams Kicking
Joshua Karty was perfect on his field-goal attempts, making 2 of 2.
He also converted both extra-point attempts and scored eight total points.
Eagles Kicking
Jake Elliott made 3 of 3 field goals, including a 44-yard attempt.
However, he missed one of three extra-point attempts.
Elliott finished with 10 points.
The missed extra point after Hurts’ opening touchdown meant Philadelphia’s early lead was 6-0 rather than 7-0. (ESPN)
Punting
Rams punter Ethan Evans recorded five punts for 257 yards, averaging 51.4 yards per punt. Four punts landed inside the 20-yard line.
Eagles punter Braden Mann recorded four punts for 199 yards, averaging 49.8 yards per punt, with two inside the 20.
Return Game
The Rams had 66 kick-return yards compared with 93 for Philadelphia.
Jordan Whittington led the Rams with two kick returns for 43 yards.
For Philadelphia, Kenneth Gainwell recorded two kick returns for 71 yards.
The Eagles therefore held a 27-yard advantage in total kick-return yardage.
Quarter-by-Quarter Breakdown
The scoring pattern explains the flow of the game.
| Quarter | Rams | Eagles |
| First | 7 | 13 |
| Second | 3 | 0 |
| Third | 5 | 3 |
| Fourth | 7 | 12 |
| Total | 22 | 28 |
Philadelphia established the initial advantage by scoring 13 points in the first quarter.
The Rams responded with 10 points during the second and third quarters combined while Philadelphia scored only three during that stretch.
That created a 16-15 Philadelphia lead entering the fourth quarter.
The final period decided the game.
Philadelphia scored 12 fourth-quarter points, including Barkley’s 78-yard touchdown run.
Los Angeles answered with a touchdown from Parkinson, but Philadelphia maintained enough separation to finish with the six-point victory. (ESPN)
The Importance of Saquon Barkley’s Two Long Touchdowns
Barkley’s 62-yard touchdown in the first quarter gave Philadelphia a 13-7 advantage.
His 78-yard touchdown in the fourth quarter moved Philadelphia from 22-15 ahead to 28-15.
Those two plays alone generated 140 rushing yards and 12 points.
This is an important lesson when analyzing los angeles rams vs philadelphia eagles match player stats.
A team can have fewer total yards and still win because certain plays have a much greater scoring impact.
Philadelphia’s offense did not consistently move the ball through the air. Instead, the Eagles repeatedly created high-value rushing plays.
Total Yardage Tells Only Part of the Story
Los Angeles finished with 402 total yards, 52 more than Philadelphia.
Normally, gaining more yards would suggest an offensive advantage.
But Philadelphia scored 28 points with 350 total yards because its rushing attack was much more efficient in producing explosive plays.
The Eagles averaged 5.7 yards per play, exactly matching the Rams’ 5.7 yards per play.
That statistic is particularly revealing.
The difference was not simply overall efficiency. It was how the teams accumulated their production.
Los Angeles generated more passing volume.
Philadelphia generated far more rushing production.
Red-Zone Performance
Red-zone execution also favored Philadelphia in an unusual way.
The Rams went 2-for-5 in the red zone.
The Eagles went 0-for-2.
At first glance, this suggests Los Angeles was more efficient near the goal line.
However, Philadelphia’s explosive touchdowns often came from outside the red zone.
Hurts scored from 44 yards.
Barkley scored from 62 yards.
Barkley later scored from 78 yards.
This meant Philadelphia did not need to rely heavily on long red-zone possessions to generate touchdowns.
The Eagles converted explosive field-position plays directly into points.
Passing Efficiency Versus Rushing Explosiveness
The statistical contrast between the quarterbacks is fascinating.
Stafford:
- 324 passing yards
- 2 passing touchdowns
- 0 interceptions
- 97.2 passer rating
Hurts:
- 128 passing yards
- 0 passing touchdowns
- 0 interceptions
- 91.2 passer rating
- 70 rushing yards
- 1 rushing touchdown
Stafford clearly generated more passing production.
Hurts, however, contributed through the ground game while Barkley supplied the majority of the rushing offense.
The result was an Eagles offensive profile built around rushing efficiency rather than passing volume.
What the Player Stats Reveal About the Game
The numbers point to several major conclusions.
1. Philadelphia won the rushing battle decisively
The Eagles produced 285 rushing yards compared with 111 for the Rams.
That 174-yard advantage was the largest statistical difference in the game.
2. Stafford was productive despite pressure
Stafford threw for 324 yards and two touchdowns without an interception.
However, five sacks reduced his net passing output to 291 yards.
3. Hurts was more important as a runner than as a passer
His 128 passing yards were modest, but his 70 rushing yards and touchdown added an important dimension.
4. Barkley produced the game’s biggest offensive numbers
His 205 rushing yards and two touchdowns were the defining individual rushing statistics.
5. Turnovers favored Philadelphia
The Eagles lost zero fumbles while the Rams lost two.
6. Explosive plays changed the scoreboard
Philadelphia’s touchdowns included runs of 44, 62 and 78 yards.
That type of explosive production compensated for the Eagles’ limited passing output.
A Closer Look at the Rams’ Offensive Distribution
The Rams did not depend on a single receiver.
Nacua led the team in yards.
Higbee led the team in receptions.
Robinson supplied the longest reception.
Kupp remained involved with five catches for 61 yards.
This distribution made Los Angeles difficult to defend through the air.
The problem was that the Rams needed to overcome Philadelphia’s ability to create explosive rushing plays.
Even with Stafford producing more passing yards than Hurts, the Rams could not generate enough scoring possessions to erase the Eagles’ early and late advantages.
A Closer Look at the Eagles’ Offensive Distribution
Philadelphia’s offensive production was heavily concentrated.
Barkley accounted for 205 rushing yards.
Hurts contributed 70 rushing yards.
Together, they accounted for 275 of the Eagles’ 285 rushing yards.
That means the Philadelphia running game was not evenly distributed across many players.
Instead, two players carried almost the entire rushing workload.
The passing attack was more evenly distributed, with Goedert, Barkley and Smith each catching four passes.
What the Statistics Say About Offensive Strategy
The numbers strongly suggest two different offensive approaches.
Los Angeles relied more heavily on its quarterback and passing game.
Philadelphia relied more heavily on its running game and quarterback mobility.
The Rams produced 291 net passing yards.
Philadelphia produced only 65 net passing yards.
But Philadelphia produced 285 rushing yards.
That balance allowed the Eagles to remain competitive even though their passing attack produced significantly less yardage.
Why the Final Six-Point Margin Matters
The final score was 28-22.
That six-point difference means the Rams remained within one possession for much of the second half.
Los Angeles entered the fourth quarter only one point behind.
The Eagles then created separation through field goals and Barkley’s 78-yard touchdown.
The Rams answered late with a Parkinson touchdown, but there was not enough time to complete another comeback.
The game therefore illustrates how a close final score can coexist with several major statistical differences.
Player-by-Player Statistical Summary
Rams
Matthew Stafford: 26 completions on 44 attempts, 324 passing yards, two touchdowns, no interceptions and five sacks.
Kyren Williams: 19 carries, 106 rushing yards, 5.6 average and no rushing touchdowns.
Puka Nacua: Six receptions for 97 yards.
Demarcus Robinson: Three receptions for 74 yards.
Cooper Kupp: Five receptions for 61 yards.
Tyler Higbee: Seven receptions for 54 yards and one touchdown.
Colby Parkinson: Two receptions for nine yards and one touchdown.
Eagles
Jalen Hurts: 15 completions on 20 attempts, 128 passing yards, no passing touchdowns, no interceptions, seven sacks, 70 rushing yards and one rushing touchdown.
Saquon Barkley: 26 carries, 205 rushing yards, two touchdowns and a 78-yard long.
Dallas Goedert: Four receptions for 56 yards.
DeVonta Smith: Four receptions for 21 yards.
A.J. Brown: Two receptions for 14 yards.
Kenneth Gainwell: One reception for 10 yards and 10 rushing yards.
How to Read These Stats Correctly
When readers search for los angeles rams vs philadelphia eagles match player stats, it is easy to focus only on the biggest numbers.
A better approach is to connect the individual statistics to the team totals.
For example, Stafford’s 324 yards look impressive, but the Rams scored only 22 points.
Hurts’ 128 passing yards look modest, but Philadelphia scored 28 points.
Barkley’s 205 rushing yards explain a large part of that difference.
Similarly, the Rams’ seven sacks appear dominant, but Philadelphia still produced 285 rushing yards.
The lesson is simple: individual statistics become more useful when they are interpreted alongside team efficiency, turnovers, explosive plays and scoring drives.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the final score between the Rams and Eagles?
The Philadelphia Eagles defeated the Los Angeles Rams 28-22 in the NFC Divisional Playoffs. (ESPN)
How many yards did Matthew Stafford throw for?
Matthew Stafford completed 26 of 44 passes for 324 yards, with two touchdowns and no interceptions. He was sacked five times for 33 yards. (ESPN)
How many rushing yards did Saquon Barkley have?
Saquon Barkley rushed 26 times for 205 yards and scored two touchdowns. His longest run was 78 yards. (ESPN)
How many rushing yards did the Eagles have?
Philadelphia recorded 285 rushing yards on 34 attempts, averaging 8.4 yards per carry. (ESPN)
How many passing yards did Jalen Hurts have?
Hurts completed 15 of 20 passes for 128 yards, with no touchdowns or interceptions. Seven sacks resulted in 63 yards lost, leaving Philadelphia with 65 net passing yards. (NFL)
Did either team throw an interception?
No. Neither Stafford nor Hurts threw an interception. The Rams, however, lost two fumbles, while Philadelphia lost none. (ESPN)
Conclusion
The los angeles rams vs philadelphia eagles match player stats show a game in which the two offenses succeeded in very different ways.
Matthew Stafford delivered 324 passing yards and two touchdowns for Los Angeles, while the Rams receiving group produced 324 combined receiving yards. Kyren Williams also passed the 100-yard rushing mark.
Philadelphia, however, built its offensive success around the ground game. Saquon Barkley rushed for 205 yards and two touchdowns, while Jalen Hurts added 70 rushing yards and another touchdown. The Eagles finished with 285 rushing yards, a 174-yard advantage over Los Angeles.
The Rams generated more total yards, more passing production and more sacks. Philadelphia countered with explosive rushing plays, a clean turnover record and enough scoring efficiency to finish ahead 28-22.
The statistical profile therefore shows why the final score cannot be understood through passing numbers alone. Rushing efficiency, explosive plays, turnovers and situational execution all played important roles in determining the outcome.
