Golden State Warriors vs Charlotte Hornets Match Player Stats
The golden state warriors vs charlotte hornets match player stats from January 18, 2026, show a game decided by shooting efficiency, balanced scoring, and Golden State’s ability to maintain control after Charlotte made a third-quarter push. The Warriors defeated the Hornets 136-116 at Chase Center in San Francisco, improving to 24-19 while Charlotte fell to 15-27. De’Anthony Melton led Golden State with 24 points off the bench, while Brandon Miller scored a game-high 28 points for Charlotte.
The final score does not fully explain why the game developed the way it did. Golden State shot 54.8 percent from the field and 44.2 percent from three-point range, compared with Charlotte’s 45.7 percent overall shooting and 36.4 percent three-point shooting. The Warriors also produced 34 assists against only 11 turnovers, giving them a much cleaner offensive profile throughout the night.
One important correction is necessary when reviewing the supplied statistics. Jonathan Kuminga did not play in this matchup. Brandin Podziemski scored 16 points and was Golden State’s third-highest scorer behind Melton and Draymond Green. The official box score lists Kuminga as not playing.
Golden State Warriors vs Charlotte Hornets Match Player Stats: Game Overview
The matchup took place at Chase Center in front of 18,064 spectators. The Warriors controlled the scoreboard from the opening quarter and never surrendered the lead.
Golden State won every quarter:
| Quarter | Charlotte Hornets | Golden State Warriors |
| 1st | 28 | 39 |
| 2nd | 29 | 30 |
| 3rd | 37 | 43 |
| 4th | 22 | 24 |
| Final | 116 | 136 |
The 20-point final margin was established through several different phases.
Golden State immediately created separation by scoring 39 points in the opening quarter. Charlotte responded reasonably well in the second period, but the Warriors still added another point to their advantage and entered halftime leading 69-57.
The Hornets then produced their strongest offensive stretch of the night during the third quarter. They reduced the deficit to three points at 82-79 midway through the period. That was the closest Charlotte came to taking control.
Golden State responded with a 20-5 run, restoring a substantial cushion before the end of the third quarter. The Warriors entered the final period ahead 112-94 and then managed the game effectively.
That sequence is important because it shows that the game was not simply a wire-to-wire blowout. Charlotte had an opportunity to change the momentum, but Golden State’s response prevented the comeback.
Golden State Warriors Offensive Performance
Golden State’s offense was built around efficiency rather than one dominant scorer.
The Warriors made 51 of 93 field-goal attempts, good for 54.8 percent. They also converted 23 of 52 three-point attempts, which translated to 44.2 percent from long range.
Those numbers created a difficult defensive assignment for Charlotte because the Hornets could not simply focus on one player.
Eight Golden State players scored at least 10 points. That level of distribution was one of the defining features of the game.
Golden State’s offensive totals included:
- 51 field goals made
- 93 field-goal attempts
- 23 three-pointers made
- 52 three-point attempts
- 11 free throws made
- 34 assists
- 41 total rebounds
- 11 turnovers
The Warriors’ 23 made three-pointers were particularly significant. They generated 69 points from three-point shots alone.
This meant Charlotte had to defend both the perimeter and the interior. Golden State also scored 56 points in the paint, so the Warriors were not relying exclusively on jump shooting.
De’Anthony Melton Leads Golden State
De’Anthony Melton was the leading scorer for Golden State with 24 points.
He finished 8-for-16 from the field, 3-for-6 from three-point range, and a perfect 5-for-5 at the free-throw line. He also contributed six rebounds and three assists.
Melton’s 21:27 of playing time makes the performance especially notable because he generated 24 points without needing a massive workload.
His scoring efficiency also mattered. He converted half of his field-goal attempts and all five of his free throws. His three made three-pointers gave Golden State additional spacing whenever he was on the floor.
Melton’s final line was:
| Stat | De’Anthony Melton |
| Minutes | 21:27 |
| Points | 24 |
| FG | 8-16 |
| FG% | 50.0% |
| 3PT | 3-6 |
| 3PT% | 50.0% |
| FT | 5-5 |
| Rebounds | 6 |
| Assists | 3 |
| Steals | 1 |
| Turnovers | 1 |
| Plus/Minus | +24 |
The +24 rating was also the best plus/minus among Golden State players in the available box-score data.
Draymond Green’s Two-Way Contribution
Draymond Green scored 20 points and added six assists.
He shot 8-for-14 from the field and 4-for-8 from three-point range. His four made three-pointers were especially valuable because Charlotte had to respect him outside the paint.
Green’s six assists also reflected his role as an offensive connector. Golden State did not need him to simply score. He helped move the ball, create opportunities, and keep the offense functioning across different lineups.
His final numbers included:
- 20 points
- 8-for-14 shooting
- 4-for-8 from three
- 6 assists
- 3 rebounds
- 3 turnovers
- 2 personal fouls
The combination of scoring and playmaking made Green one of the central contributors to Golden State’s offensive balance.
Brandin Podziemski Provides More Than Scoring
Brandin Podziemski scored 16 points and supplied seven assists, six rebounds, and two steals.
He shot 5-for-9 from the field and made three of his six three-point attempts.
The seven assists were particularly important. Podziemski was not simply another perimeter scorer. His passing helped Golden State maintain its ball movement and contributed to the team’s 34 total assists.
His box-score line was:
| Stat | Brandin Podziemski |
| Minutes | 29:42 |
| Points | 16 |
| FG | 5-9 |
| 3PT | 3-6 |
| FT | 3-5 |
| Rebounds | 6 |
| Assists | 7 |
| Steals | 2 |
| Turnovers | 0 |
| Plus/Minus | +16 |
The zero-turnover performance is another useful detail when evaluating his contribution.
Stephen Curry’s Role
Stephen Curry scored 14 points in the victory.
He finished 6-for-12 from the field and 2-for-8 from three-point range. While his three-point percentage was not especially efficient, his presence still influenced the defensive structure Charlotte had to use.
Curry’s gravity can create opportunities even when he is not the leading scorer. Defenders have to account for his shooting range, which can create additional space for teammates.
Golden State did not need Curry to carry the scoring load because Melton, Green, Podziemski, Buddy Hield, Al Horford, and other contributors supplied enough production.
That balance was one of the clearest themes of the game.
Buddy Hield and Al Horford Add Efficient Minutes
Buddy Hield scored 14 points in only 17:43.
He shot 5-for-8 from the field, including 2-for-5 from three-point range, and made both of his free throws.
Al Horford added 11 points in 18:52. He shot 4-for-7 from the field, 2-for-4 from three, and 1-for-1 at the free-throw line. He also recorded two blocks.
Gary Payton II scored five points, while Trayce Jackson-Davis added two points in limited action. Will Richard scored 11 points, providing another double-digit contribution for Golden State.
This distribution explains why Golden State could withstand periods when its primary stars were not producing at their highest level.
Jonathan Kuminga Did Not Play
The supplied data identifies Jonathan Kuminga as Golden State’s third-highest scorer with 16 points. That information does not match the official game record.
Kuminga did not play in this matchup.
Brandin Podziemski was the Warriors’ third-highest scorer with 16 points. The official box score lists Kuminga as “Did Not Play.”
This distinction matters for anyone using the article for player-stat research, fantasy analysis, historical records, or future comparisons.
A player who did not appear in the game should not be included in the scoring statistics for that matchup.
Brandon Miller Leads Charlotte
Brandon Miller was Charlotte’s leading scorer and the game’s overall leading scorer with 28 points.
He also collected six rebounds and made six three-pointers.
Miller’s scoring came against a Golden State team that was shooting efficiently at the other end. That made his offensive production important because Charlotte needed consistent scoring to stay within reach.
He finished with 28 points, six rebounds, and five assists according to the official Hornets game information and NBA coverage.
Miller’s 28 points were not enough to overcome Golden State’s depth, but they were the strongest individual scoring performance from either team.
Kon Knueppel Records a Double-Double
Kon Knueppel finished with 24 points and 11 rebounds, giving Charlotte one of the strongest individual statistical performances of the game.
He shot 9-for-14 from the field, 4-for-5 from three-point range, and 2-for-2 from the free-throw line.
That translates to 64.3 percent shooting from the field and 80 percent shooting from three.
His 11 rebounds were also a team-leading figure.
Knueppel’s final line included:
| Stat | Kon Knueppel |
| Minutes | 29:19 |
| Points | 24 |
| FG | 9-14 |
| FG% | 64.3% |
| 3PT | 4-5 |
| 3PT% | 80.0% |
| FT | 2-2 |
| Rebounds | 11 |
| Assists | 2 |
| Steals | 1 |
| Blocks | 1 |
| Turnovers | 2 |
| Plus/Minus | -21 |
The statistical contrast is interesting. Knueppel had excellent individual shooting numbers, but Charlotte still lost by 20 points.
That illustrates why individual scoring totals should always be examined alongside team efficiency and overall possession data.
Charlotte’s Other Key Scorers
Grant Williams contributed 17 points for Charlotte.
Collin Sexton also scored 17 points, while LaMelo Ball added 15.
Those contributions gave Charlotte four players in double figures at the top of the scoring list.
However, Golden State’s depth was greater. The Warriors had eight players reach double figures, which made it harder for Charlotte to compensate for defensive breakdowns.
The difference in scoring depth is one of the clearest explanations for the final margin.
Charlotte’s leading contributors were:
| Player | Points |
| Brandon Miller | 28 |
| Kon Knueppel | 24 |
| Grant Williams | 17 |
| Collin Sexton | 17 |
| LaMelo Ball | 15 |
The Hornets needed more production from the rest of the lineup to match Golden State’s broad scoring distribution.
Shooting Efficiency Explains Much of the Difference
One of the most important parts of the golden state warriors vs charlotte hornets match player stats is the shooting comparison.
| Category | Charlotte | Golden State |
| Field Goals | 43-94 | 51-93 |
| FG% | 45.7% | 54.8% |
| 3PT | 16-44 | 23-52 |
| 3PT% | 36.4% | 44.2% |
| Free Throws | 14-17 | 11-13 |
| FT% | 82.4% | 84.6% |
| Rebounds | 44 | 41 |
| Assists | 27 | 34 |
| Turnovers | 17 | 11 |
| Steals | 5 | 8 |
| Blocks | 3 | 7 |
Charlotte actually had a slight rebounding advantage, 44 to 41.
That did not translate into control of the game because Golden State was considerably more efficient with its shooting and ball movement.
The Warriors made eight more field goals despite taking one fewer field-goal attempt.
They also made seven more three-pointers.
That combination produced a major scoring advantage.
The Three-Point Difference
Three-point shooting was arguably the biggest numerical separator.
Golden State made 23 three-pointers.
Charlotte made 16.
That is a seven-shot difference from behind the arc. Since each made three-pointer is worth three points, those additional makes represented 21 points of scoring difference from that category alone.
Golden State also shot 44.2 percent from three compared with Charlotte’s 36.4 percent.
This was not simply a case of Golden State taking more threes. The Warriors were also converting them at a higher rate.
The Warriors attempted 52 three-pointers, while Charlotte attempted 44.
That eight-attempt difference shows how strongly Golden State leaned into perimeter offense.
Ball Movement Was Another Major Factor
Golden State recorded 34 assists.
Charlotte recorded 27.
The seven-assist difference is meaningful because it reflects how often successful field goals came through coordinated offensive action.
Golden State’s 34 assists against 51 made field goals means roughly two-thirds of its made baskets were assisted.
Charlotte’s 27 assists against 43 made field goals also represents a significant assisted share, but Golden State generated more total assisted baskets.
The Warriors’ offensive distribution was therefore not dependent solely on individual isolation scoring.
Players moved the ball, created open looks, and benefited from the spacing created by their perimeter shooting.
Turnovers Created an Additional Advantage
Charlotte committed 17 turnovers.
Golden State committed only 11.
That six-turnover difference gave the Warriors additional possessions and reduced the number of opportunities Charlotte had to score.
Golden State also recorded eight steals compared with Charlotte’s five.
The Warriors produced 19 fast-break points, while Charlotte recorded 10.
This combination of lower turnovers, more steals, and more transition scoring helped Golden State turn defensive activity into offense.
The official NBA game summary also recorded a 22-point advantage for Golden State in points off turnovers.
The Third Quarter Changed the Game
The third quarter deserves special attention when studying the matchup.
Charlotte scored 37 points in the period.
That was its highest-scoring quarter of the game.
The Hornets also cut Golden State’s lead to 82-79 during the third quarter.
At that stage, the game had shifted from a comfortable Golden State advantage to a much more competitive contest.
Then the Warriors responded.
Golden State produced a 20-5 run and pushed the lead back to 102-84 with 2:27 remaining in the third quarter.
That response effectively ended Charlotte’s strongest comeback opportunity.
The Warriors finished the quarter with 43 points and carried an 18-point lead into the fourth.
Why the First Quarter Mattered
Golden State’s 39-28 first-quarter advantage created the foundation for the victory.
A 12-point lead after one quarter forced Charlotte to spend the rest of the game chasing the score.
The Hornets did reduce the deficit, but they never fully erased the damage created by Golden State’s opening offensive burst.
The Warriors also shot efficiently throughout the game, meaning Charlotte could not rely on a major shooting regression to create a comeback.
Comparing the Two Teams’ Offensive Profiles
The two teams approached scoring differently.
Charlotte had two major individual scoring performances from Miller and Knueppel.
Golden State had a wider distribution.
This produced an important contrast:
Charlotte’s scoring leaders:
- Miller: 28
- Knueppel: 24
- Williams: 17
- Sexton: 17
- Ball: 15
Golden State’s leading scorers:
- Melton: 24
- Green: 20
- Podziemski: 16
- Curry: 14
- Hield: 14
- Horford: 11
- Richard: 11
Golden State’s seven listed double-digit scorers demonstrate how many players contributed meaningful offensive production.
The NBA’s official recap states that eight Warriors scored at least 10 points.
Rebounding Was Not the Deciding Category
It would be easy to assume that Golden State controlled the game because it dominated every statistical category.
That was not the case.
Charlotte actually won the overall rebounding battle 44-41.
That includes a useful reminder about basketball analysis: the team with more rebounds does not automatically win.
Golden State’s advantage came from other areas, particularly:
- Field-goal percentage
- Three-point percentage
- Three-point makes
- Assists
- Turnover control
- Steals
- Blocks
- Fast-break scoring
The Warriors also scored 56 points in the paint compared with Charlotte’s 48.
So despite losing the rebounding battle, Golden State maintained enough interior scoring to avoid becoming overly dependent on three-point attempts.
Defensive Statistics
Golden State recorded eight steals and seven blocks.
Charlotte recorded five steals and three blocks.
The Warriors therefore produced 15 combined steals and blocks, compared with eight for Charlotte.
That difference reflects a broader defensive activity advantage.
Golden State’s defense was not perfect. Charlotte still shot 45.7 percent from the field and 36.4 percent from three.
But Golden State’s defense generated enough turnovers and blocked shots to create extra possessions and disrupt Charlotte’s offensive rhythm.
What the Game Says About Player Statistics
The golden state warriors vs charlotte hornets match player stats are most useful when viewed together rather than as an isolated list of points.
For example, Knueppel scored 24 points on 9-for-14 shooting and grabbed 11 rebounds.
That is an excellent individual statistical performance.
Yet Charlotte still lost by 20.
Melton scored the same number of points but did so in fewer than 22 minutes, while also helping Golden State to a +24 plus/minus.
Podziemski scored only 16 points, but his seven assists and zero turnovers made his contribution more valuable than his scoring total alone might suggest.
Green scored 20 points while also producing six assists.
These examples show why a box score should be interpreted rather than merely copied.
Season Series Between Charlotte and Golden State
The January matchup completed a 2-0 season-series sweep for Golden State.
The Warriors had previously defeated Charlotte 132-125 on December 31, 2025.
They then won the second meeting 136-116.
Across those two games, Golden State therefore scored 268 points while Charlotte scored 241.
The second matchup was much more decisive than the first.
The December meeting was a seven-point game, while the January meeting ended with a 20-point margin.
That change is useful when comparing the two contests because it shows that the January game was not simply a repeat of the earlier result.
Game Context and Team Records
Following the victory, Golden State moved to 24-19.
The Warriors were 16-6 at home according to the supplied game information.
Charlotte dropped to 15-27 and was 8-15 on the road.
The venue was Chase Center in San Francisco, where attendance was recorded at 18,064.
The officiating crew consisted of Eric Dalen, Tyler Ford, and Matt Kallio.
The official NBA game information lists the matchup as a January 17 game in San Francisco, while the game information also identifies January 18 in its scheduling details.
What Stands Out Most From the Box Score
Several numbers immediately stand out when the complete box score is considered.
1. Golden State made 23 threes
This was one of the clearest sources of separation.
2. Eight Warriors scored in double figures
The scoring was distributed across the roster rather than concentrated around one player.
3. Melton scored 24 points off the bench
His efficiency gave Golden State an immediate offensive boost.
4. Green added 20 points and six assists
His production came as both a scorer and playmaker.
5. Miller scored 28 points
He led all players in scoring despite Charlotte’s defeat.
6. Knueppel posted 24 points and 11 rebounds
His double-double was one of Charlotte’s strongest individual performances.
7. Golden State committed only 11 turnovers
That was six fewer than Charlotte.
8. Golden State shot nearly 55 percent
That level of efficiency made it difficult for Charlotte to recover from the early deficit.
How to Read These Stats Correctly
Readers searching for player statistics often focus first on points.
Points are important, but they do not tell the entire story.
A more complete evaluation should consider at least five areas:
- Scoring efficiency: How many shots did the player need to produce his points?
- Playmaking: How many assists did the player generate?
- Possession control: Did the player protect the ball?
- Rebounding and defense: Did the player contribute outside scoring?
- Team impact: What happened while the player was on the court?
Using this approach gives a clearer picture of the game.
For example, Melton’s 24 points came with six rebounds, three assists, one steal, and one turnover.
Podziemski’s 16 points came with seven assists, six rebounds, two steals, and zero turnovers.
Green’s 20 points came alongside six assists.
These lines demonstrate why a player-stat article should go beyond a simple scoring leaderboard.
Key Statistical Takeaways
The most important findings from the game can be summarized as follows:
- Golden State won 136-116.
- Golden State won all four quarters.
- Melton led the Warriors with 24 points.
- Green scored 20 points and added six assists.
- Podziemski scored 16 points and added seven assists.
- Curry scored 14 points.
- Hield scored 14 points.
- Horford and Richard each scored 11.
- Miller led all scorers with 28 points.
- Knueppel scored 24 points and grabbed 11 rebounds.
- Golden State shot 54.8 percent from the field.
- Charlotte shot 45.7 percent.
- Golden State made 23 three-pointers.
- Charlotte made 16 three-pointers.
- Golden State recorded 34 assists.
- Charlotte recorded 27 assists.
- Charlotte committed 17 turnovers.
- Golden State committed 11 turnovers.
- Golden State won the season series 2-0.
- Jonathan Kuminga did not play in the matchup.
The official NBA box score is the best primary reference for checking individual player lines and game totals.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who scored the most points in the Warriors vs Hornets game?
Brandon Miller was the game’s leading scorer with 28 points. De’Anthony Melton led Golden State with 24 points.
What was the final score between the Warriors and Hornets?
Golden State defeated Charlotte 136-116 at Chase Center.
How many three-pointers did Golden State make?
The Warriors made 23 of 52 three-point attempts, shooting 44.2 percent from beyond the arc.
How many points did De’Anthony Melton score?
De’Anthony Melton scored 24 points. He shot 8-for-16 from the field, 3-for-6 from three-point range, and 5-for-5 from the free-throw line.
Did Jonathan Kuminga play against Charlotte?
No. Jonathan Kuminga did not play in this matchup. Brandin Podziemski scored 16 points and was the Warriors’ third-highest scorer.
Did Golden State win the season series?
Yes. Golden State won both regular-season meetings with Charlotte during the 2025-26 season, taking the series 2-0.
Conclusion
The golden state warriors vs charlotte hornets match player stats from this matchup show a clear difference between individual production and overall team execution.
Brandon Miller led everyone with 28 points, while Kon Knueppel produced 24 points and 11 rebounds. Charlotte received useful scoring from several players, but its 17 turnovers and lower shooting efficiency created problems that individual scoring could not overcome.
Golden State’s success came from a much broader offensive contribution. De’Anthony Melton led the team with 24 points, Draymond Green added 20 points and six assists, and Brandin Podziemski contributed 16 points with seven assists and six rebounds. Stephen Curry, Buddy Hield, Al Horford, and Will Richard also reached double figures.
The biggest team-level differences were Golden State’s 54.8 percent field-goal shooting, 23 made three-pointers, 34 assists, and only 11 turnovers. Charlotte’s 44 rebounds were not enough to offset those advantages.
The third quarter was especially important. Charlotte reduced the margin to three points, but Golden State answered with a 20-5 run and restored control before entering the fourth quarter with an 18-point lead.
The statistical record also makes one correction essential: Jonathan Kuminga did not play, so his name should not appear among the game’s scoring leaders. Brandin Podziemski was the Warriors’ third-highest scorer with 16 points. This distinction is important for anyone using the matchup as a historical player-stat reference.
Overall, the box score tells the story of a game in which Charlotte had strong individual performances, but Golden State received contributions from a much deeper group while maintaining superior shooting efficiency and possession control.
