San Antonio Spurs vs Atlanta Hawks Match Player Stats
The san antonio spurs vs atlanta hawks match player stats from the November 21, 2025 meeting tell a much more interesting story than the final score alone. San Antonio defeated Atlanta 135-126 at Frost Bank Center, but the game featured major swings in momentum, elite three-point shooting from the Hawks, a career-best scoring performance from Nickeil Alexander-Walker, and a balanced offensive response from the Spurs.
San Antonio entered the matchup with an 11-4 record and an 8-2 home mark, while Atlanta was 9-7 overall and 7-3 on the road. The Spurs ultimately improved their season series advantage to 1-0 after overcoming a strong Atlanta shooting night and a fourth-quarter comeback attempt.
For readers searching for detailed player numbers, this matchup provides several useful angles. Alexander-Walker scored 38 points, Jalen Johnson recorded 26 points, 12 rebounds, and 7 assists, while De’Aaron Fox led San Antonio with 26 points and 9 assists. Keldon Johnson also delivered 25 points off the bench.
The most important lesson from the box score is that San Antonio did not win simply by shooting better. Atlanta actually converted a higher percentage of its field goals and three-pointers. The Spurs won through a combination of ball movement, free-throw efficiency, rebounding, turnover control, transition scoring, and a crucial fourth-quarter response.
San Antonio Spurs vs Atlanta Hawks Match Player Stats: Game Overview
The game was played at Frost Bank Center in San Antonio, Texas, with an announced attendance of 18,354.
| Category | Atlanta Hawks | San Antonio Spurs |
| Final Score | 126 | 135 |
| Record entering game | 9-7 | 11-4 |
| Away/Home Record | 7-3 away | 8-2 home |
| Field Goals | 49-87 | 48-91 |
| Field Goal % | 56% | 53% |
| Three-Pointers | 20-37 | 17-40 |
| Three-Point % | 54% | 43% |
| Free Throws | 8-13 | 22-30 |
| Rebounds | 39 | 43 |
| Assists | 30 | 34 |
| Turnovers | 16 | 10 |
| Steals | 7 | 10 |
| Blocks | 6 | 4 |
Atlanta’s 20 made three-pointers were a major reason the game remained competitive. The Hawks converted 20 of 37 attempts from beyond the arc, while San Antonio made 17 of 40.
That shooting difference is important because it prevents a simplistic interpretation of the result. The Hawks were highly efficient from outside, yet San Antonio still produced enough offense in other areas to win.
The Spurs also made 22 of 30 free throws compared with Atlanta’s 8 of 13. That created a 14-point advantage at the free-throw line, which became one of the clearest statistical differences in a nine-point game.
The official NBA box score provides the complete game record and player breakdown.
Quarter-by-Quarter Breakdown
The scoring pattern explains why the final result was so competitive.
| Quarter | Atlanta Hawks | San Antonio Spurs |
| 1st | 34 | 28 |
| 2nd | 26 | 46 |
| 3rd | 32 | 21 |
| 4th | 34 | 40 |
| Total | 126 | 135 |
Atlanta started quickly, scoring 34 points in the opening quarter. San Antonio answered with a huge second period, putting up 46 points while limiting the Hawks to 26.
That 20-point swing in the second quarter temporarily changed the shape of the game.
The Hawks did not disappear after halftime. They scored 32 points in the third quarter while San Antonio managed only 21. That allowed Atlanta to erase much of the deficit and enter the fourth quarter with a realistic opportunity to take control.
The fourth quarter then became the deciding period.
San Antonio scored 40 points and Atlanta scored 34. That six-point advantage was enough to secure the nine-point victory.
The quarter pattern can therefore be summarized as follows:
- Atlanta controlled the opening period.
- San Antonio dominated the second quarter.
- Atlanta responded strongly in the third.
- San Antonio closed the game more effectively.
This is one of the clearest reasons the box score needs to be examined beyond the final score.
Atlanta Hawks Player Stats
Nickeil Alexander-Walker
Nickeil Alexander-Walker was the standout individual scorer for Atlanta.
He finished with:
- 38 points
- 13-of-17 shooting
- 8-of-10 from three-point range
- 4-of-4 free throws
- 4 rebounds
- 5 assists
- 3 blocks
- 2 turnovers
His 38 points represented an exceptional scoring night, particularly because he combined volume with efficiency.
Alexander-Walker did not need a huge number of attempts to reach 38 points. He made 13 of 17 field-goal attempts and 8 of 10 three-point attempts.
That means his outside shooting created enormous pressure on San Antonio’s defense.
The unusual part of his performance was that Atlanta still lost despite receiving such an efficient scoring display from its leading scorer. That highlights the difference between individual production and team-level execution.
Jalen Johnson
Jalen Johnson provided Atlanta with an all-around performance.
He recorded:
- 26 points
- 12 rebounds
- 7 assists
- 10-of-15 shooting
- 2-of-3 from three-point range
- 4-of-6 from the free-throw line
- 1 steal
- 4 turnovers
Johnson’s 12 rebounds led all Atlanta players, while his seven assists also led the Hawks.
His contribution was therefore not limited to scoring. He was involved in nearly every major offensive category.
The 26-point, 12-rebound, 7-assist line is especially valuable when analyzing the game because it shows how Atlanta generated offense through multiple actions rather than relying entirely on perimeter scoring.
Kristaps Porzingis
Kristaps Porzingis added 16 points for Atlanta.
He shot 7 of 10 from the field and made 2 of 3 three-point attempts. He also collected five rebounds, two blocks, and one assist.
His shooting efficiency helped Atlanta maintain its offensive efficiency, particularly in a game where the Hawks converted 56% of their field-goal attempts.
Onyeka Okongwu
Onyeka Okongwu scored 15 points and added seven rebounds and five assists.
He shot 6 of 11 from the field and connected on 3 of 5 three-point attempts.
That three-point contribution from the center position was another reason Atlanta was able to stretch the San Antonio defense.
Dyson Daniels
Dyson Daniels finished with:
- 8 points
- 6 rebounds
- 5 assists
- 3 steals
- 5 turnovers
His defensive activity was useful, but the five turnovers were costly.
Daniels was one of Atlanta’s leading players in defensive disruption, yet San Antonio’s overall turnover advantage remained significant.
Atlanta’s Supporting Production
Luke Kennard scored 10 points and made 2 of 3 three-point attempts.
Vit Krejci contributed five points and four steals, while Keaton Wallace scored six points. Mouhamed Gueye did not score.
The Hawks therefore received meaningful contributions beyond their primary scorers, but the distribution was not enough to offset San Antonio’s broader production.
San Antonio Spurs Player Stats
De’Aaron Fox
De’Aaron Fox was the leading scorer for San Antonio.
He finished with:
- 26 points
- 5 rebounds
- 9 assists
- 9-of-16 shooting
- 2-of-4 from three-point range
- 6-of-10 free throws
- 3 steals
- 2 turnovers
His nine assists were the most by any Spurs player.
Fox’s value in this matchup came from his ability to combine scoring with playmaking. Atlanta could not focus exclusively on stopping him as a scorer because he was also responsible for creating opportunities for teammates.
His three steals also contributed to San Antonio’s transition opportunities.
Keldon Johnson
Keldon Johnson provided one of the most important bench performances of the game.
He scored 25 points while shooting 9 of 12 from the field, 3 of 5 from three-point range, and 4 of 5 from the free-throw line.
He also grabbed seven rebounds and recorded two assists.
His efficiency stands out immediately. Johnson needed only 12 field-goal attempts to score 25 points.
That type of bench scoring can change the structure of a game because it gives the starting lineup additional support without requiring another high-volume offensive role.
Julian Champagnie
Julian Champagnie scored 20 points.
His shooting line was particularly notable:
- 7-of-13 field goals
- 5-of-10 three-pointers
- 1-of-1 free throws
- 4 rebounds
- 5 assists
- 1 block
Champagnie was one of San Antonio’s most important perimeter contributors.
His five made three-pointers helped compensate for the Spurs’ lower overall three-point percentage compared with Atlanta.
Harrison Barnes
Harrison Barnes scored 16 points and added five rebounds and two assists.
He shot 5 of 13 from the field and 2 of 8 from three-point range while making all four of his free-throw attempts.
Barnes also provided veteran stability during a game that experienced several major momentum swings.
Devin Vassell
Devin Vassell contributed 15 points, five rebounds, and three assists.
He shot 6 of 11 from the field and 3 of 5 from three-point range.
His 54.5% field-goal shooting and 60% three-point shooting gave San Antonio another efficient perimeter option.
David Jones Garcia
One of the most interesting performances came from David Jones Garcia.
He recorded:
- 12 points
- 5 rebounds
- 6 assists
- 3 steals
- 1 block
- 5-of-7 shooting
- 1-of-1 from three-point range
His plus-minus was +25, the strongest figure among Spurs players.
That number should not be treated as a standalone measure of performance, but it does underline how effective San Antonio’s minutes were when Jones Garcia was on the floor.
His six assists were especially important because the Spurs needed additional playmaking while several key players were unavailable.
Jeremy Sochan
Jeremy Sochan finished with eight points, five rebounds, five assists, one steal, and one block.
He shot 3 of 10 from the field and 2 of 2 from the free-throw line.
Although his scoring efficiency was modest, his five assists gave San Antonio another source of ball movement.
Kelly Olynyk and Carter Bryant
Kelly Olynyk scored eight points in limited minutes, adding two rebounds and one steal.
Carter Bryant played only a short stretch and finished without scoring while collecting two rebounds.
Bismack Biyombo and Lindy Waters III did not play.
Who Led the Game in Each Major Statistical Category?
The clearest answer to the player-stat question comes from the category leaders.
| Category | Atlanta Hawks | San Antonio Spurs |
| Points | Nickeil Alexander-Walker, 38 | De’Aaron Fox, 26 |
| Rebounds | Jalen Johnson, 12 | Keldon Johnson, 7 |
| Assists | Jalen Johnson, 7 | De’Aaron Fox, 9 |
| Steals | Dyson Daniels, 3 | De’Aaron Fox and David Jones Garcia, 3 each |
| Blocks | Nickeil Alexander-Walker, 3 | Julian Champagnie and David Jones Garcia, 1 each |
This table demonstrates how different the two teams’ statistical profiles were.
Atlanta had the game’s highest individual scorer and the game’s leading rebounder. San Antonio, however, had the leading assist producer and stronger turnover numbers.
That distinction is important when explaining the result.
Shooting Efficiency and Why It Matters
At first glance, Atlanta’s shooting numbers appear superior.
The Hawks made 49 of 87 field-goal attempts, compared with 48 of 91 for San Antonio.
Atlanta also made 20 of 37 three-point attempts, while San Antonio made 17 of 40.
In percentage terms, the Hawks shot approximately 56% from the field and 54% from three-point range. The Spurs shot approximately 53% from the field and 43% from three.
So how did San Antonio win?
The answer is that shooting percentage is only one part of a basketball game.
The Spurs had advantages in several other areas:
- 43 rebounds compared with 39
- 34 assists compared with 30
- 10 turnovers compared with 16
- 10 steals compared with 7
- 22 made free throws compared with 8
- 19 fast-break points compared with 6
- 60 points in the paint compared with 46
These differences helped San Antonio generate more total scoring opportunities.
Turnovers Were a Major Difference
The Hawks committed 16 turnovers.
San Antonio committed only 10.
That six-turnover difference matters because the Spurs also produced 10 steals.
Atlanta’s turnover total effectively gave San Antonio additional possessions, while the Spurs protected their own opportunities more effectively.
The difference is particularly significant in a game decided by nine points.
A team does not necessarily need to shoot better to win. It can also create more possessions, generate transition chances, and avoid giving away possessions.
That is exactly what the Spurs did.
Free Throws Gave San Antonio Another Advantage
The free-throw numbers were heavily tilted toward San Antonio.
Atlanta made 8 of 13 attempts.
San Antonio made 22 of 30.
That produced a 14-point advantage in made free throws.
The Spurs’ 73% free-throw shooting was not extraordinary by itself, but the volume of attempts was important.
Atlanta’s three-point shooting kept the Hawks close, but San Antonio generated enough scoring opportunities at the foul line to offset some of Atlanta’s perimeter efficiency.
This is a useful reminder when analyzing basketball statistics: a high three-point percentage can be neutralized by differences in free throws, turnovers, rebounding, and shot volume.
Rebounding Comparison
San Antonio finished with 43 rebounds, while Atlanta had 39.
The overall margin was four rebounds.
More importantly, the Spurs grabbed 10 offensive rebounds compared with five for Atlanta.
Offensive rebounds extend possessions.
They can lead to second-chance points, force defensive rotations, and create additional opportunities even after an initial missed shot.
San Antonio turned those extra possessions into 10 second-chance points, compared with six for Atlanta.
That four-point second-chance advantage did not decide the game alone, but it contributed to the larger possession battle.
Assists Show the Spurs’ Ball Movement
San Antonio recorded 34 assists.
Atlanta recorded 30.
The four-assist difference is another indication that the Spurs generated a more distributed offensive attack.
Fox led San Antonio with nine assists, while Champagnie and several other players also contributed as playmakers.
Atlanta was not poor in this area. Jalen Johnson recorded seven assists, while Alexander-Walker and Daniels each added five.
However, San Antonio’s combination of 34 assists and only 10 turnovers created a strong assist-to-turnover profile.
That balance is one of the most useful statistics for understanding the Spurs’ offensive execution.
The Second Quarter Changed the Game
The second quarter deserves special attention.
Atlanta scored 26 points.
San Antonio scored 46.
That was a 20-point difference in a single quarter.
The Spurs used the period to establish their largest advantage of the game. Their strong offensive execution created separation even though Atlanta had started the night with a 34-point first quarter.
The quarter also showed why a box score should be read sequentially rather than simply from the final totals.
If someone looked only at Atlanta’s 56% field-goal percentage, they might assume the Hawks controlled most of the game.
They did not.
San Antonio’s second-quarter explosion created a lead that Atlanta had to spend the rest of the game trying to recover.
Atlanta’s Third-Quarter Response
The Hawks responded in the third quarter.
Atlanta scored 32 points while holding San Antonio to 21.
That 11-point swing brought the game back into contention.
This period was important because it demonstrated Atlanta’s offensive resilience.
Rather than allowing the second-quarter deficit to end the contest, the Hawks increased their scoring and reduced San Antonio’s offensive output.
The game therefore entered the fourth quarter with momentum shifting again.
San Antonio’s Fourth-Quarter Finish
The final period belonged to the Spurs.
San Antonio scored 40 points.
Atlanta scored 34.
The six-point advantage was not massive, but it came at the most important point of the game.
The Spurs also benefited from a decisive late stretch after Atlanta had taken a brief lead in the fourth quarter.
Their ability to answer instead of allowing the comeback to continue was critical.
The final score of 135-126 reflects a close game much more than a runaway victory.
What the Player Stats Reveal About Both Teams
The individual numbers reveal two very different approaches.
Atlanta had spectacular individual efficiency from Alexander-Walker and strong all-around production from Jalen Johnson.
The Hawks also shot the ball exceptionally well from three-point range.
San Antonio relied more heavily on balance.
Fox controlled the offense.
Keldon Johnson supplied efficient scoring from the bench.
Champagnie provided perimeter shooting.
Jones Garcia contributed in several categories.
Barnes and Vassell added reliable scoring.
Sochan helped with passing, rebounding, and defense.
That distribution meant San Antonio had multiple ways to respond when Atlanta changed its defensive approach.
The Importance of Depth
Depth became especially relevant because both teams entered the game without several important players.
San Antonio was missing Victor Wembanyama, Stephon Castle, and Dylan Harper.
Atlanta was without Trae Young.
Those absences changed the normal offensive hierarchy.
For San Antonio, Fox took on more responsibility while Jones Garcia became a significant contributor.
For Atlanta, Alexander-Walker and Jalen Johnson carried much of the offensive burden.
This context matters when comparing the raw statistics. The box score reflects the players who actually took the court, but the absences explain why some players had unusually large roles.
San Antonio Spurs vs Atlanta Hawks Match Player Stats and the Season Series
The November matchup gave San Antonio a 1-0 lead in the season series.
The teams later met again in December, when San Antonio won 126-98.
That second meeting changed the overall season-series picture to 2-0 in favor of the Spurs.
The two games were very different.
The first meeting was a nine-point contest in which Atlanta scored 126 points and shot extremely well from three-point range.
The second meeting was much more one-sided, with San Antonio winning by 28 points.
Looking at both games together provides more useful context than focusing exclusively on one result.
What to Look For When Comparing Future Matchups
For anyone tracking future games between Atlanta and San Antonio, several statistical categories deserve attention.
Three-Point Volume
Atlanta’s ability to generate and convert three-point attempts can dramatically change the scoreboard.
In the November game, the Hawks made 20 threes.
A similar perimeter performance can keep Atlanta competitive even against a team that controls other parts of the game.
Turnover Margin
The Spurs had a six-turnover advantage.
Future matchups should therefore be examined through both turnovers committed and steals generated.
Free-Throw Attempts
The Spurs’ 30 free-throw attempts compared with Atlanta’s 13 created a substantial scoring opportunity difference.
That category can swing considerably depending on offensive style and defensive strategy.
Offensive Rebounding
San Antonio grabbed 10 offensive rebounds.
Extra possessions are particularly valuable when a team is not matching its opponent’s three-point percentage.
Bench Scoring
Keldon Johnson’s 25 points were a major factor.
Atlanta also received useful bench scoring, but San Antonio’s bench contribution helped maintain offensive pressure throughout the game.
How to Read a Box Score Like an Analyst
A useful approach is to avoid starting with the final score.
Instead, examine the game in this order:
- Check the final score.
- Review the quarter-by-quarter scoring.
- Identify the leading scorers.
- Compare field-goal and three-point efficiency.
- Check free-throw attempts and makes.
- Compare rebounds and offensive rebounds.
- Examine assists and turnovers together.
- Look at steals and transition opportunities.
- Review individual plus-minus carefully.
- Consider injuries and unavailable players.
This method produces a more complete picture than simply identifying the highest scorer.
For this matchup, that approach reveals why Alexander-Walker’s 38 points were not enough to produce a Hawks victory.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who was the top scorer in the Spurs vs Hawks game?
Nickeil Alexander-Walker led all scorers with 38 points for Atlanta. De’Aaron Fox led San Antonio with 26 points.
Who had the most rebounds?
Jalen Johnson led all players with 12 rebounds. Keldon Johnson was San Antonio’s leading rebounder with seven.
Who led the game in assists?
De’Aaron Fox led the game with nine assists. Jalen Johnson led Atlanta with seven.
How many three-pointers did Atlanta make?
Atlanta made 20 of 37 three-point attempts, finishing at roughly 54% from beyond the arc.
How many turnovers did each team commit?
Atlanta committed 16 turnovers, while San Antonio committed 10.
Who won the game?
The San Antonio Spurs defeated the Atlanta Hawks 135-126.
Conclusion
The san antonio spurs vs atlanta hawks match player stats show why the November matchup was much closer and more complex than the final score suggests.
Nickeil Alexander-Walker’s 38-point performance was the headline individual achievement for Atlanta. Jalen Johnson added 26 points, 12 rebounds, and seven assists, giving the Hawks an excellent all-around contribution.
San Antonio answered with a more balanced attack. De’Aaron Fox recorded 26 points and nine assists, Keldon Johnson scored 25 highly efficient points, Julian Champagnie added 20, and David Jones Garcia produced 12 points, six assists, five rebounds, three steals, and a block.
The most important statistical differences were not simply shooting percentage. San Antonio created advantages through free throws, turnovers, offensive rebounds, assists, steals, points in the paint, and transition scoring.
Atlanta shot better from the field and from three-point range, but San Antonio generated enough additional opportunities to overcome that efficiency gap.
The 135-126 result therefore provides a useful example of why complete player and team statistics matter. One spectacular scoring performance can dominate the headlines, but winning basketball is often determined by several smaller advantages working together across 48 minutes.
