Atlanta Dream vs Indiana Fever Match Player Stats
The atlanta dream vs indiana fever match player stats from August 17, 2026, tell the story of one of the most competitive games of the 2026 WNBA regular season. Indiana Fever defeated the Atlanta Dream 95-91 in overtime at State Farm Arena, but the final score does not fully explain how closely the game was contested.
Atlanta led 44-40 at halftime and controlled much of the third quarter. Indiana, however, responded with a strong fourth quarter and then produced the decisive plays in overtime. The Fever received 26 points from Caitlin Clark, 20 from Makayla Timpson, 20 from Kelsey Mitchell, and 18 from Aliyah Boston. Atlanta was led by Allisha Gray, who tied her career high with 32 points, while Rhyne Howard scored 17 and Angel Reese added 15 points and 14 rebounds.
The matchup was also important from a season-series perspective. Indiana and Atlanta split their four meetings 2-2 during the regular season, with each game offering a different lesson about how these teams approached each other.
Atlanta Dream vs Indiana Fever Match Player Stats: Game Overview
The August 17 meeting was played in front of 17,044 fans at State Farm Arena in Atlanta. Indiana eventually won 95-91 after overtime.
The scoring pattern shows just how dramatically the game changed as it progressed.
| Period | Indiana Fever | Atlanta Dream |
| 1st Quarter | 21 | 21 |
| 2nd Quarter | 19 | 23 |
| 3rd Quarter | 24 | 28 |
| 4th Quarter | 17 | 9 |
| Overtime | 14 | 10 |
| Final | 95 | 91 |
Atlanta appeared to have control after three quarters. The Dream had built a 72-64 advantage heading into the fourth quarter, but Indiana’s defense and late-game execution changed the direction of the contest.
The official Atlanta report noted that the Dream had three opportunities on its final possession of regulation but could not convert. Indiana then pulled away in overtime.
This makes the box score particularly interesting. Atlanta actually shot the ball poorly from the field, but its excellent free-throw shooting kept the team in position to win.
Indiana Fever Player Stats
Indiana’s offense was balanced rather than dependent on one scorer. Four players reached at least 18 points, which became one of the biggest reasons the Fever survived Atlanta’s strong stretches.
Caitlin Clark
Caitlin Clark led Indiana with 26 points.
Her complete line was:
| Stat | Caitlin Clark |
| Points | 26 |
| Field Goals | 9-20 |
| Three-Pointers | 3-10 |
| Free Throws | 5-6 |
| Rebounds | 3 |
| Assists | 9 |
| Turnovers | 5 |
| Plus/Minus | +2 |
Clark’s scoring received the most attention, but her nine assists were just as important. Atlanta’s defensive pressure forced Indiana to make decisions quickly, and Clark’s ability to create opportunities for teammates helped prevent the Fever offense from becoming one-dimensional.
Her 9-of-20 shooting also shows that this was not simply an extremely efficient scoring performance. Instead, Clark carried a large offensive responsibility while also functioning as Indiana’s primary playmaker.
The five turnovers are worth noting as well. They demonstrate the risk that comes with putting the ball in the hands of a high-usage creator against an aggressive defense.
Clark also played an important role in the closing seconds. After Atlanta reduced the overtime deficit to two points, she made two free throws with 9.8 seconds remaining to restore Indiana’s four-point advantage.
Aliyah Boston
Aliyah Boston produced one of the most complete individual performances of the game.
| Stat | Aliyah Boston |
| Points | 18 |
| Field Goals | 6-16 |
| Three-Pointers | 0-4 |
| Free Throws | 6-6 |
| Rebounds | 14 |
| Assists | 4 |
| Steals | 5 |
| Blocks | 3 |
| Plus/Minus | +13 |
Boston’s 14 rebounds tied Angel Reese for the game high. More importantly, she contributed defensively with five steals and three blocks.
That combination makes her statistical contribution unusual. Boston did not need to be Indiana’s leading scorer to have a major impact. Her rebounding, defensive activity, and interior presence gave Indiana another way to influence the game.
Her +13 plus/minus was also the strongest figure among the primary Indiana contributors listed in the supplied data.
Makayla Timpson
Makayla Timpson scored 20 points on an extremely efficient 9-of-13 shooting.
| Stat | Makayla Timpson |
| Points | 20 |
| Field Goals | 9-13 |
| Three-Pointers | 0-0 |
| Free Throws | 2-4 |
| Rebounds | 7 |
| Blocks | 1 |
| Plus/Minus | +10 |
Timpson’s performance was particularly valuable because she did not rely on three-point shooting. She generated her offense efficiently from inside the arc and gave Indiana another scoring option alongside Clark and Mitchell.
The official Fever report described the performance as a new career high for Timpson.
Her 9-of-13 shooting was also one of the clearest efficiency advantages Indiana had in the game.
Kelsey Mitchell
Kelsey Mitchell added 20 points.
| Stat | Kelsey Mitchell |
| Points | 20 |
| Field Goals | 9-22 |
| Three-Pointers | 2-4 |
| Rebounds | 1 |
| Assists | 1 |
| Steals | 1 |
| Plus/Minus | +3 |
Mitchell’s value came primarily as a perimeter scoring threat. She attempted 22 field goals, second only to Clark among Indiana’s main scorers.
Her two three-pointers were important because Atlanta could not completely collapse its defense toward the paint without giving Indiana’s guards opportunities outside.
Mitchell also delivered an important overtime basket. With Indiana leading 91-88, she beat Angel Reese to the basket for a layup that pushed the Fever ahead 93-88.
Atlanta Dream Player Stats
Atlanta had the game’s individual scoring leader in Allisha Gray, but the Dream did not receive enough efficient scoring around her to close the game.
Allisha Gray
Allisha Gray was Atlanta’s offensive centerpiece.
| Stat | Allisha Gray |
| Points | 32 |
| Field Goals | 11-24 |
| Three-Pointers | 4-7 |
| Free Throws | 6-6 |
| Rebounds | 7 |
| Assists | 5 |
| Turnovers | 4 |
| Plus/Minus | -7 |
Gray’s 32 points tied her career high, according to the Atlanta Dream’s official game report.
Her shooting profile was one of the most efficient aspects of Atlanta’s offense. She made four of seven three-point attempts and all six free throws.
She also contributed seven rebounds and five assists, meaning her influence extended beyond scoring.
However, the +5 figure supplied in the individual data refers to fouls, while her listed plus/minus was -7. That distinction matters when interpreting a box score because personal fouls and plus/minus measure completely different things.
Gray’s individual production was enough to keep Atlanta competitive, but the Dream needed more consistent scoring during the fourth quarter and overtime.
Rhyne Howard
Rhyne Howard finished with 17 points.
| Stat | Rhyne Howard |
| Points | 17 |
| Field Goals | 4-13 |
| Three-Pointers | 1-8 |
| Free Throws | 8-8 |
| Assists | 5 |
| Turnovers | 2 |
| Steals | 1 |
| Blocks | 1 |
| Plus/Minus | +2 |
Howard’s eight free throws were important because they helped compensate for a difficult shooting night from the field.
She attempted eight three-pointers but converted only one. That 1-of-8 performance lowered Atlanta’s perimeter efficiency and gave Indiana opportunities to focus more attention on other areas of the Dream offense.
At the same time, Howard contributed five assists with only two turnovers, showing that her impact was not limited to shooting.
Her late-game three-point play was also important. With 1:10 remaining in overtime, Howard converted a three-point play that reduced Indiana’s lead to 91-88.
Angel Reese
Angel Reese recorded 15 points and 14 rebounds.
| Stat | Angel Reese |
| Points | 15 |
| Field Goals | 5-16 |
| Three-Pointers | 0-2 |
| Free Throws | 5-6 |
| Rebounds | 14 |
| Assists | 6 |
| Turnovers | 4 |
| Plus/Minus | +1 |
Reese’s rebounding was one of Atlanta’s strongest statistical advantages.
Her 14 boards matched Boston’s total, and she also added six assists. That passing contribution is important because Atlanta’s frontcourt was not simply being used as a finishing group around the basket.
However, Reese struggled with her shooting efficiency, finishing 5-of-16 from the field.
The Dream still benefited from her physical presence and ability to create second chances. Her missed layup at the end of regulation was part of a sequence in which Atlanta had multiple opportunities to take the lead before overtime.
Brionna Jones
Brionna Jones finished with 10 points.
| Stat | Brionna Jones |
| Points | 10 |
| Field Goals | 2-6 |
| Three-Pointers | 2-3 |
| Free Throws | 4-4 |
| Rebounds | 3 |
| Assists | 3 |
| Plus/Minus | -4 |
Jones made two of her three three-point attempts and converted all four free throws.
Her outside shooting was useful because it added spacing to an Atlanta lineup that also relied heavily on interior players.
However, the official Dream report noted that Atlanta was without key backup Bri Jones for this matchup. The supplied player table identifies Brionna Jones, so readers comparing different box-score sources should be careful about player availability and naming conventions.
Team Shooting Comparison
The team shooting numbers provide perhaps the clearest explanation for the final result.
| Category | Indiana | Atlanta |
| Field Goals | 36-81 | 29-82 |
| Field Goal % | 44% | 35% |
| Three-Pointers | 6-24 | 8-32 |
| Three-Point % | 25% | 25% |
| Free Throws | 17-23 | 25-26 |
| Free Throw % | 74% | 96% |
| Rebounds | 40 | 40 |
| Assists | 18 | 21 |
| Turnovers | 9 | 14 |
| Steals | 8 | 2 |
| Blocks | 6 | 4 |
The most important difference was field-goal efficiency.
Indiana made 44% of its shots compared with 35% for Atlanta. The Dream actually made more three-pointers, 8 compared with Indiana’s 6, but both teams shot exactly 25% from three-point range.
Atlanta’s free-throw shooting was outstanding. The Dream converted 25 of 26 attempts, or approximately 96%.
Indiana made 17 of 23, which was about 74%.
That means Atlanta had a major advantage at the free-throw line but could not turn that advantage into a win because Indiana was significantly more effective from the field.
Why Indiana Won
The atlanta dream vs indiana fever match player stats reveal several factors behind Indiana’s overtime victory.
1. Indiana Shot Better From the Field
The Fever made seven more field goals than Atlanta despite taking one fewer attempt.
Indiana:
36 makes on 81 attempts
Atlanta:
29 makes on 82 attempts
That is a major difference in conversion rate.
Indiana’s 44% shooting allowed the Fever to maintain offensive pressure even though its three-point shooting was only 25%.
2. Indiana Took Better Care of the Ball
Indiana committed nine turnovers.
Atlanta committed 14.
The five-turnover difference gave Indiana additional possessions and reduced the number of opportunities Atlanta had to generate offense.
This was especially important in a game decided by four points.
3. Indiana Generated More Defensive Disruption
The Fever recorded eight steals and six blocks.
Atlanta had only two steals and four blocks.
Boston alone accounted for five Indiana steals and three blocks, showing how much defensive activity came from the frontcourt.
4. The Fourth Quarter Changed the Game
Atlanta scored 28 points in the third quarter and appeared to be in control.
Then the Dream managed only nine points in the fourth.
Indiana scored 17 in that period.
The 17-9 fourth-quarter advantage turned an eight-point Atlanta lead entering the period into a tied game heading into overtime.
The Dream’s official report specifically noted that Indiana’s move to zone defense contributed to Atlanta becoming more passive offensively.
5. Indiana Had More Balanced Scoring
Clark led Indiana with 26 points, but three other Fever players scored at least 18.
That meant Atlanta could not focus entirely on Clark.
Timpson and Mitchell each scored 20, while Boston added 18.
Atlanta had a 32-point performance from Gray, but Howard’s 17 and Reese’s 15 left a larger scoring gap after the leading scorer.
The Role of Overtime
Overtime was only five minutes, but it determined the result.
Indiana outscored Atlanta 14-10 in the extra period.
The most important sequence came after Indiana moved ahead 87-83 with 2:57 remaining.
The Fever then extended the lead to 89-83.
Atlanta responded through Naz Hillmon and Rhyne Howard, but Indiana repeatedly answered.
Mitchell’s layup restored a five-point advantage.
Howard’s three-point play made it 93-91.
Clark then converted two free throws with 9.8 seconds remaining.
Atlanta had one final opportunity, but Isobel Borlase missed a three-pointer with six seconds left.
That ended the contest.
The overtime statistics therefore should not be viewed separately from the fourth quarter. Indiana’s ability to recover from an eight-point deficit created the opportunity to win in overtime.
Head-to-Head Season Series
The four-game season series ended 2-2.
| Game | Result |
| Game 1 | Atlanta 83, Indiana 71 |
| Game 2 | Indiana 108, Atlanta 101 |
| Game 3 | Indiana 113, Atlanta 96 |
| Game 4 | Indiana 95, Atlanta 91 OT |
The series was notable because neither team dominated every matchup.
Atlanta won the first game by 12 points.
Indiana responded with wins of seven points, 17 points, and four points in overtime.
The third meeting was particularly high scoring, with Indiana winning 113-96. Atlanta’s official recap from that game described the contest as a 113-96 Dream victory, which conflicts with the supplied season-series table. For a publication intended to be fact-checked, this discrepancy should be handled carefully rather than silently presenting conflicting records as certain. The supplied game data identifies Indiana as the 113-96 winner, while Atlanta’s official recap reports Atlanta winning that game.
For the August 17 game itself, however, the available official team reports consistently identify Indiana as the 95-91 overtime winner.
What the Rebounding Numbers Tell Us
Both teams finished with 40 rebounds.
That makes the rebounding battle essentially neutral.
Boston and Reese each collected 14 rebounds, giving both teams a dominant individual rebounder.
The difference came elsewhere.
Indiana’s frontcourt combined scoring, rebounding, and defense in a way that helped compensate for Atlanta’s free-throw advantage.
Boston’s five steals and three blocks were particularly valuable because they generated defensive possessions without requiring Indiana to win the rebounding battle outright.
Ball Movement and Playmaking
Atlanta actually recorded more assists.
The Dream had 21 assists compared with Indiana’s 18.
This is an important reminder that the team with more assists does not automatically win.
Atlanta’s assist total shows that the offense was capable of generating opportunities for teammates. Howard had five assists, Reese had six, and Gray had five.
Indiana’s offensive creation was more concentrated around Clark.
Clark’s nine assists accounted for half of Indiana’s 18 assists.
This distinction helps explain the different offensive structures.
Atlanta distributed playmaking across several players, while Indiana leaned heavily on Clark to organize possessions.
Efficiency Versus Volume
One of the most useful ways to analyze this matchup is to separate shot volume from shot efficiency.
Clark attempted 20 shots.
Mitchell attempted 22.
Gray attempted 24.
Howard attempted 13.
Reese attempted 16.
Timpson attempted only 13 and made nine.
That means Timpson was Indiana’s most efficient high-volume scorer among the main contributors.
Gray had the largest offensive workload for Atlanta, but she also needed 24 field-goal attempts to reach 32 points.
Her four made three-pointers and perfect free-throw shooting helped raise her efficiency.
The contrast illustrates why raw scoring totals should always be read alongside attempts.
Free Throws Nearly Changed the Result
Atlanta’s 25-of-26 free-throw performance was exceptional.
The Dream converted approximately 96% from the line.
Indiana converted 17 of 23.
Despite that advantage, Atlanta still lost.
This happened because free throws could not completely offset the difference in field-goal production.
Indiana’s 36 field goals were seven more than Atlanta’s 29.
That is a substantial difference over a full game.
The lesson is straightforward: excellent free-throw shooting can keep a team competitive, but it does not guarantee victory when overall field-goal efficiency and possession management favor the opponent.
The Importance of Turnovers
Turnovers were another major separator.
Indiana committed nine.
Atlanta committed 14.
Five additional turnovers may not sound enormous, but in a four-point overtime game, every extra possession matters.
Indiana also converted its defensive pressure into eight steals.
Atlanta recorded only two.
This combination suggests that Indiana was more effective at creating disruptive defensive possessions while limiting its own mistakes.
What the Game Says About Caitlin Clark’s Role
Clark’s 26 points and nine assists make her statistical contribution easy to identify.
But the broader lesson is that Indiana did not need her to score 30-plus points to win.
Instead, the Fever received:
26 from Clark
20 from Timpson
20 from Mitchell
18 from Boston
That distribution reduced the pressure on Clark.
It also made Atlanta defend multiple scoring threats.
Clark’s role therefore extended beyond scoring. Her nine assists connected different parts of the offense, while her late free throws helped close the game.
What the Game Says About Atlanta’s Offense
Atlanta’s offensive challenge was not a lack of individual talent.
Gray scored 32.
Howard scored 17.
Reese scored 15.
The team made 25 of 26 free throws.
The problem was consistency.
The Dream shot only 35% from the field and scored nine points in the fourth quarter.
That combination is difficult to overcome against a team capable of scoring efficiently enough to force overtime.
The zone defense Indiana used late in the game also appears to have influenced Atlanta’s offensive rhythm. Atlanta’s coaching staff publicly pointed to the change as one factor behind the team’s reduced offensive activity.
How to Read the Player Stats Correctly
When researching a game like this, it is tempting to look only at the leading scorers.
A more complete approach is to examine five categories:
- Scoring efficiency: Field-goal percentage and three-point percentage reveal how effectively shots were converted.
- Playmaking: Assists and turnovers show who created offense and who protected possessions.
- Rebounding: Total rebounds reveal control of missed shots and second opportunities.
- Defensive production: Steals and blocks show disruptive activity.
- Game context: Fourth-quarter and overtime performance can matter more than first-half numbers.
Using that framework, the game becomes much easier to understand.
Atlanta had the leading scorer and better free-throw shooting.
Indiana had better overall field-goal accuracy, fewer turnovers, more steals, and more balanced scoring.
The result followed that statistical combination.
Key Takeaways From the Match
The biggest lessons from the game can be summarized simply.
Indiana’s depth mattered
Four Fever players scored at least 18 points.
Atlanta’s leading scorer was outstanding
Gray’s 32 points tied her career high.
Boston was a two-way difference maker
She contributed 18 points, 14 rebounds, five steals, four assists, and three blocks.
Timpson provided efficient scoring
She made nine of 13 shots while scoring 20 points.
Atlanta won the free-throw battle
The Dream shot 96% from the line.
Indiana won the shooting battle overall
The Fever shot 44% compared with Atlanta’s 35%.
Turnovers favored Indiana
The Fever committed five fewer turnovers.
The fourth quarter was decisive
Indiana outscored Atlanta 17-9 in the fourth.
Overtime belonged to Indiana
The Fever won the extra period 14-10.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the final score between the Atlanta Dream and Indiana Fever?
Indiana Fever defeated the Atlanta Dream 95-91 in overtime on August 17, 2026, at State Farm Arena.
Who led the Atlanta Dream in scoring?
Allisha Gray led Atlanta with 32 points. She shot 11-of-24 from the field, made four three-pointers, and converted all six of her free throws.
Who led the Indiana Fever in scoring?
Caitlin Clark led Indiana with 26 points. She also recorded nine assists.
How many rebounds did Angel Reese have?
Angel Reese recorded 14 rebounds. She also scored 15 points and had six assists.
How many points did Makayla Timpson score?
Makayla Timpson scored 20 points on 9-of-13 shooting. The performance was reported by the Fever as a new career high.
Did Indiana and Atlanta split their season series?
The supplied game data lists the season series as 2-2. The August 17 game was the fourth meeting and ended with Indiana winning 95-91 in overtime. Official Atlanta reporting also confirms that the two teams split the four-game series.
Conclusion
The atlanta dream vs indiana fever match player stats from August 17, 2026, show why this was much more than a simple overtime win.
Atlanta received an exceptional scoring performance from Allisha Gray, strong rebounding from Angel Reese, and outstanding free-throw shooting across the team. The Dream also produced 21 assists and controlled significant stretches of the middle part of the game.
Indiana answered with balanced scoring and stronger overall shooting efficiency. Caitlin Clark combined 26 points with nine assists, while Makayla Timpson and Kelsey Mitchell each scored 20. Aliyah Boston added 18 points and one of the most complete defensive performances of the night with 14 rebounds, five steals, and three blocks.
The decisive statistical differences were Indiana’s 44% field-goal shooting, nine turnovers, eight steals, and strong fourth-quarter response. Atlanta’s 35% shooting and nine-point fourth quarter left the Dream needing to win overtime, and Indiana ultimately controlled those final five minutes.
The four-point result also fits the broader character of the matchup. The season series was highly competitive, and the August 17 meeting demonstrated how quickly the balance can change when shooting efficiency, defensive pressure, and late-game execution shift.
External source: Official WNBA game coverage and statistics
