jacksonville jaguars vs bengals match player stats

Jacksonville Jaguars vs Bengals Match Player Stats

The jacksonville jaguars vs bengals match player stats from the September 14, 2025 NFL Week 2 matchup tell the story of a highly competitive game that came down to execution in the second half. The Cincinnati Bengals defeated the Jacksonville Jaguars 31-27, improving to 2-0 while Jacksonville moved to 1-1. Although Jacksonville produced 139 rushing yards and intercepted Cincinnati quarterbacks three times, the Bengals created enough offensive production through their passing game to overcome those turnovers and secure the four-point victory.

For anyone studying the jacksonville jaguars vs bengals match player stats, the final score alone does not explain how the game developed. Cincinnati finished with 302 passing yards and 317 receiving yards, while Jacksonville recorded 271 passing yards and 271 receiving yards. The Bengals also received an exceptional performance from Ja’Marr Chase, who caught 14 passes for 165 yards and a touchdown.

Jacksonville, meanwhile, received strong contributions from Trevor Lawrence, Parker Washington, Dyami Brown, Travis Etienne Jr., and its defensive unit. Lawrence threw three touchdown passes, but his two interceptions and the Jaguars’ inability to consistently finish drives helped Cincinnati stay within reach.

The result was a game where individual performances on both sides mattered significantly. Cincinnati’s passing production and second-half scoring ultimately outweighed Jacksonville’s defensive takeaways and stronger rushing output.

Table of Contents

Jacksonville Jaguars vs Bengals Match Player Stats: Game Overview

The Bengals entered the contest with a 1-0 record and finished the game 2-0. Jacksonville also entered Week 2 with a 1-0 record but left Cincinnati at 1-1.

The final score was:

Cincinnati Bengals 31, Jacksonville Jaguars 27

The scoring distribution shows how much the game changed after halftime.

Quarter Jacksonville Jaguars Cincinnati Bengals
Q1 7 7
Q2 10 3
Q3 7 14
Q4 3 7
Final 27 31

Jacksonville held a 17-10 halftime lead. Cincinnati then responded with a 14-point third quarter and added another touchdown in the fourth.

That second-half turnaround is one of the most important elements in the jacksonville jaguars vs bengals match player stats. Jacksonville did enough early to build a seven-point halftime advantage, but Cincinnati’s offense became more productive after the break.

The Bengals ultimately scored 21 second-half points compared with Jacksonville’s 10.

Trevor Lawrence Passing Performance

Trevor Lawrence was the primary passer for Jacksonville and completed 24 of 42 attempts for 271 yards.

His passing line was:

  • 24 completions
  • 42 attempts
  • 271 passing yards
  • 6.5 yards per attempt
  • 3 touchdown passes
  • 2 interceptions
  • 1 sack for 10 yards
  • 24.1 QBR
  • 80.6 passer rating

The three touchdown passes were important because Jacksonville remained productive through the air despite Cincinnati generating pressure and forcing two interceptions.

Lawrence averaged 6.5 yards per attempt, which indicates that Jacksonville was able to move the ball through a mixture of intermediate and deeper throws rather than relying exclusively on short completions.

However, the two interceptions became costly in a game decided by only four points.

His performance illustrates why box-score evaluation should consider both production and mistakes. Three touchdown passes helped Jacksonville score 27 points, but two interceptions gave Cincinnati additional opportunities.

Lawrence’s Role in Jacksonville’s Offensive Balance

Jacksonville did not depend entirely on Lawrence.

The Jaguars rushed 27 times for 139 yards, averaging 5.1 yards per carry. That gave the offense another productive avenue and helped prevent Cincinnati from focusing exclusively on the passing game.

Lawrence himself added two rushing attempts for four yards.

His primary responsibility remained passing, however, and the numbers show that Jacksonville moved the ball effectively enough to score 27 points. The bigger issue was maintaining offensive efficiency throughout the entire game.

Jake Browning and Joe Burrow Passing Stats

Cincinnati’s quarterback statistics were unusual because both Jake Browning and Joe Burrow recorded passing production.

Browning completed 21 of 32 passes for 241 yards, averaging 7.5 yards per attempt. He threw two touchdowns and three interceptions.

His recorded statistics included:

  • 21 completions
  • 32 attempts
  • 241 yards
  • 7.5 yards per attempt
  • 2 touchdowns
  • 3 interceptions
  • 1 sack for 7 yards
  • 69.7 QBR
  • 69.9 passer rating

Burrow completed 7 of 13 passes for 76 yards, averaging 5.8 yards per attempt. He threw one touchdown and no interceptions.

His numbers were:

  • 7 completions
  • 13 attempts
  • 76 yards
  • 5.8 yards per attempt
  • 1 touchdown
  • 0 interceptions
  • 2 sacks for 8 yards
  • 64.8 QBR
  • 97.0 passer rating

Together, Cincinnati’s quarterbacks produced 28 completions on 45 attempts for 302 yards, three touchdowns, and three interceptions.

The team averaged 7.0 yards per pass attempt.

That production was especially significant because Cincinnati managed to generate more passing yards than Jacksonville despite throwing three interceptions.

Ja’Marr Chase Dominates the Receiving Numbers

Among all individual players in the jacksonville jaguars vs bengals match player stats, Ja’Marr Chase produced the most eye-catching receiving performance.

Chase caught:

  • 14 passes
  • 165 receiving yards
  • 11.8 yards per reception
  • 1 touchdown
  • 16 targets
  • 25-yard longest reception

His 16 targets were particularly important. Cincinnati repeatedly involved him in the passing attack, and Chase converted those opportunities into 14 receptions.

He accounted for a major portion of Cincinnati’s 317 receiving yards.

Chase’s production also helped Cincinnati maintain offensive momentum even when the Jaguars’ defense created turnovers. Rather than allowing interceptions to completely disrupt the passing attack, the Bengals continued feeding one of their most productive offensive weapons.

For analysts looking beyond the final score, Chase’s target volume is one of the clearest indicators of Cincinnati’s offensive approach.

Tee Higgins Provides Explosive Support

Tee Higgins gave Cincinnati another productive receiving option.

He finished with:

  • 3 receptions
  • 56 yards
  • 18.7 yards per reception
  • 1 touchdown
  • 42-yard longest reception

Higgins had fewer catches than Chase, but his average gain was significantly higher.

His 42-yard reception was Cincinnati’s longest listed completion among the highlighted receiving performances. That type of explosive play can change field position immediately and create scoring opportunities without requiring a long series of short completions.

The combination of Chase’s volume and Higgins’ explosiveness gave Cincinnati two different methods of attacking Jacksonville’s secondary.

Jacksonville Receiving Leaders

Jacksonville’s receiving production was spread across several players.

The Jaguars recorded 24 receptions for 271 yards and three touchdowns on 41 targets. Their average was 11.3 yards per reception, with a longest reception of 40 yards.

Parker Washington led the team in receiving yardage.

He recorded:

  • 5 receptions
  • 76 yards
  • 15.2 yards per reception
  • 5 targets
  • 40-yard longest reception

Washington was particularly valuable because he contributed both as a receiver and returner.

Dyami Brown also made a significant contribution with five receptions for 57 yards and a touchdown. His average was 11.4 yards per reception.

Brian Thomas Jr. added four receptions for 49 yards, averaging 12.3 yards per catch.

The Jaguars also received receiving touchdowns from Bhayshul Tuten and Travis Etienne Jr.

Jacksonville’s Receiving Distribution

The Jaguars’ production was not concentrated around one receiver to the same degree as Cincinnati’s offense.

Their highlighted receiving statistics included:

Player Receptions Yards Average TD
Parker Washington 5 76 15.2 0
Dyami Brown 5 57 11.4 1
Brian Thomas Jr. 4 49 12.3 0
Bhayshul Tuten 2 32 16.0 1
Travis Etienne Jr. 2 18 9.0 1

This distribution demonstrates that Jacksonville had multiple players capable of producing meaningful gains.

Travis Etienne Jr. Leads Jacksonville’s Rushing Attack

Travis Etienne Jr. was Jacksonville’s leading rusher.

He carried the ball 14 times for 71 yards, averaging 5.1 yards per carry. His longest run covered 30 yards.

His rushing line was:

  • 14 carries
  • 71 yards
  • 5.1 yards per carry
  • 30-yard longest run
  • 0 rushing touchdowns

Etienne’s 30-yard run was Jacksonville’s longest rushing play listed in the game statistics.

The Jaguars as a team finished with 27 rushing attempts for 139 yards, averaging 5.1 yards per carry.

That was substantially more rushing production than Cincinnati generated.

Bhayshul Tuten Adds Efficiency

Bhayshul Tuten had eight carries for 42 yards, averaging 5.3 yards per attempt.

His longest run was nine yards.

He also contributed through the passing game with two receptions for 32 yards and a touchdown.

That combination gave Tuten an important multi-purpose role. He contributed as a runner, receiver, and kick returner.

His overall involvement demonstrates why player statistics should not always be evaluated by one category. A player with modest rushing numbers can still have a meaningful impact through receiving and special teams.

Jacksonville’s Other Rushers

LeQuint Allen Jr. recorded two carries for 13 yards, averaging 6.5 yards per carry.

Dyami Brown had one rushing attempt for nine yards.

Trevor Lawrence carried twice for four yards.

Combined with Etienne and Tuten, these contributions produced Jacksonville’s 139 rushing yards.

The Jaguars averaged 5.1 yards per carry, which was considerably better than Cincinnati’s 2.8-yard team rushing average.

Cincinnati’s Rushing Production

Cincinnati struggled to generate consistent rushing yardage.

Chase Brown led the Bengals with 16 carries for 47 yards, averaging 2.9 yards per carry.

His longest rush covered 11 yards.

Jake Browning recorded one carry for one yard and a rushing touchdown.

Cincinnati finished with only 17 rushing attempts for 48 yards.

The Bengals averaged 2.8 yards per carry.

This creates an interesting contrast in the game statistics. Jacksonville was more productive on the ground, but Cincinnati compensated with significantly more passing production.

The Bengals’ ability to win despite producing only 48 rushing yards highlights the importance of passing efficiency, explosive receiving plays, and scoring opportunities.

Defensive Statistics and Turnovers

The defensive statistics are among the most interesting parts of the game.

Jacksonville recorded:

  • 63 tackles
  • 39 solo tackles
  • 3 sacks
  • 6 tackles for loss
  • 12 passes defended
  • 9 quarterback hits
  • 3 interceptions

Cincinnati recorded:

  • 69 tackles
  • 43 solo tackles
  • 1 sack
  • 2 tackles for loss
  • 8 passes defended
  • 4 quarterback hits
  • 2 interceptions

Jacksonville generated more sacks, quarterback hits, tackles for loss, and interceptions.

Yet Cincinnati still won.

That makes the final result particularly useful for understanding why isolated defensive statistics do not always tell the complete story.

Jacksonville Defensive Leaders

Jourdan Lewis led Jacksonville with eight tackles, including five solo tackles.

Eric Murray recorded seven tackles and six solo tackles.

Foyesade Oluokun contributed seven tackles, three solo tackles, one sack, two tackles for loss, one pass defended, and one quarterback hit.

Josh Hines-Allen finished with six tackles, four solo tackles, and three quarterback hits.

These numbers show that Jacksonville’s defense was active around the line of scrimmage.

The unit also produced three interceptions.

Jacksonville’s Three Interceptions

Andrew Wingard recorded one interception and returned it 39 yards.

Devin Lloyd recorded one interception and returned it 22 yards.

Eric Murray recorded one interception and returned it 12 yards.

Jacksonville’s interception team total was:

  • 3 interceptions
  • 73 return yards
  • 0 interception touchdowns

Three interceptions are usually a major defensive achievement, especially when combined with three sacks.

However, Cincinnati’s offense still produced enough yardage and touchdowns to recover from those mistakes.

Cincinnati Defensive Leaders

Cincinnati’s defense recorded 69 tackles, including 43 solo tackles.

Dax Hill led the Bengals with nine tackles and nine solo tackles. He also recorded one tackle for loss and one pass defended.

Geno Stone added nine tackles and seven solo tackles.

Logan Wilson recorded eight tackles, four solo tackles, and one pass defended.

Demetrius Knight Jr. contributed five tackles and two solo tackles.

The Bengals produced two interceptions.

Jordan Battle recorded one interception with four return yards.

Dax Hill recorded the other interception.

The Bengals’ defense therefore finished with two interceptions, four interception return yards, one sack, two tackles for loss, eight passes defended, and four quarterback hits.

Turnover Battle

The turnover statistics provide one of the clearest analytical angles.

Jacksonville intercepted Cincinnati quarterbacks three times.

Cincinnati intercepted Trevor Lawrence twice.

Jacksonville therefore had a one-interception advantage in the game.

Yet Cincinnati still won 31-27.

That fact demonstrates that turnover count alone cannot determine the winner of a football game.

Cincinnati’s 302 passing yards and 317 receiving yards helped offset the additional turnover. Jacksonville’s offense produced 271 passing yards and 271 receiving yards, but Cincinnati scored four more points.

For readers researching the jacksonville jaguars vs bengals match player stats, this is one of the most useful lessons from the game. A team can win several statistical categories and still lose because scoring efficiency and explosive plays can outweigh advantages elsewhere.

Special Teams Performance

Special teams also contributed to the overall statistical picture.

Jacksonville Kicking

Cam Little was perfect on field-goal attempts.

He made:

  • 2 of 2 field goals
  • 100 percent field-goal accuracy
  • Longest field goal of 42 yards
  • 3 of 3 extra points
  • 9 total points

Little’s nine points represented a reliable contribution for Jacksonville.

Cincinnati Kicking

Evan McPherson also converted every listed kick.

He made:

  • 1 of 1 field goals
  • 100 percent field-goal accuracy
  • Longest field goal of 31 yards
  • 4 of 4 extra points
  • 7 total points

Neither team suffered a major kicking breakdown.

Kick Returns

Parker Washington returned three kicks for 75 yards, averaging 25.0 yards per return, with a long of 32 yards.

Bhayshul Tuten returned one kick for 26 yards.

Jacksonville therefore recorded 101 kick return yards at a 25.3-yard average.

Cincinnati’s Samaje Perine recorded six kick returns for 154 yards, averaging 25.7 yards per return, with a long of 37 yards.

Perine’s return production gave Cincinnati strong field-position contributions.

Punting Comparison

Logan Cooke punted twice for Jacksonville.

He accumulated 95 yards, averaging 47.5 yards per punt. His longest punt traveled 60 yards, and one punt finished inside the 20-yard line.

Ryan Rehkow punted three times for Cincinnati for 166 yards.

He averaged 55.3 yards per punt, with a longest punt of 63 yards and two punts inside the 20.

Both punters provided useful field-position work, although Rehkow’s average and total yardage were higher.

Parker Washington’s All-Around Contribution

Parker Washington deserves special attention because his impact extended beyond receiving.

He led Jacksonville in receiving yards with 76.

He also returned three kickoffs for 75 yards and two punts for 19 yards.

His combined kick and punt return yardage was 94 yards.

That makes him one of Jacksonville’s most active players across multiple phases.

His five receptions for 76 yards gave Lawrence a reliable target, while his return work provided additional field-position value.

This is an important reminder when interpreting jacksonville jaguars vs bengals match player stats: offensive box scores are only one part of a player’s total contribution.

Cincinnati’s Offensive Strategy

Cincinnati’s statistical profile suggests a passing-oriented attack.

The Bengals finished with:

  • 302 passing yards
  • 48 rushing yards
  • 317 receiving yards
  • 3 passing touchdowns
  • 1 rushing touchdown

The contrast between 302 passing yards and 48 rushing yards is significant.

Cincinnati generated more than six times as many passing yards as rushing yards.

Chase was the central receiving weapon, while Higgins provided a high-value complementary threat.

The Bengals’ offense did not need a dominant rushing game to reach 31 points.

Jacksonville’s Offensive Strategy

Jacksonville produced a more balanced statistical profile.

The Jaguars recorded:

  • 271 passing yards
  • 139 rushing yards
  • 271 receiving yards
  • 3 passing touchdowns
  • 0 rushing touchdowns

Jacksonville’s 139 rushing yards were 91 more than Cincinnati’s 48.

The Jaguars also averaged 5.1 yards per rushing attempt compared with Cincinnati’s 2.8.

This suggests Jacksonville was capable of producing efficiently on the ground.

However, the Bengals’ passing attack produced enough volume and scoring efficiency to compensate for their weaker rushing output.

Comparing the Offensive Leaders

A direct comparison of the principal offensive performers provides a clearer picture of the matchup.

Category Jacksonville Cincinnati
Leading passer Trevor Lawrence Jake Browning
Passing yards 271 241
Team passing yards 271 302
Leading receiver Parker Washington Ja’Marr Chase
Leading receiving yards 76 165
Team receiving yards 271 317
Leading rusher Travis Etienne Jr. Chase Brown
Rushing yards 71 47
Team rushing yards 139 48
Passing TDs 3 3
Interceptions thrown 2 3

This comparison reveals a game defined by contrasting offensive identities.

Jacksonville had the stronger rushing attack.

Cincinnati had the stronger passing and receiving production.

Those differences are central to understanding why the game finished with a four-point margin.

Why Ja’Marr Chase’s Performance Matters

Chase’s 14 catches for 165 yards represented a substantial share of Cincinnati’s offensive output.

His 16 targets show that the Bengals consistently looked toward him.

His receiving total alone was nearly two-thirds of Jacksonville’s entire team receiving yardage.

That level of involvement creates pressure on a defense because the offense can continue targeting its most productive receiver even after defensive adjustments.

The 25-yard longest reception also shows that his impact was not based entirely on short completions.

Why Jacksonville’s Three Interceptions Were Not Enough

Jacksonville’s defense deserves credit for generating three interceptions.

Andrew Wingard, Devin Lloyd, and Eric Murray each recorded one.

The Jaguars also recorded three sacks.

Nevertheless, Cincinnati scored 31 points.

One reason is that the Bengals continued producing offensive yardage despite the turnovers. Their quarterbacks combined for 302 passing yards and three passing touchdowns.

This illustrates a broader football principle: turnovers are highly valuable, but their impact depends on what the opposing offense does with its remaining possessions.

Jacksonville created multiple defensive opportunities, but Cincinnati repeatedly responded with productive offensive sequences.

Second-Half Swing

The quarter-by-quarter scoring provides a straightforward explanation for the final result.

Jacksonville scored 17 points in the first half.

Cincinnati scored 10.

After halftime, Cincinnati scored 14 points in the third quarter and seven in the fourth.

Jacksonville scored seven in the third and three in the fourth.

The Bengals therefore outscored Jacksonville 21-10 during the second half.

That 11-point second-half advantage erased Jacksonville’s seven-point halftime lead and created the final four-point margin.

For anyone reviewing the jacksonville jaguars vs bengals match player stats, the second-half scoring pattern is arguably more informative than the final score itself.

Key Statistical Takeaways

Several conclusions stand out from the complete game data.

Cincinnati Won Through the Passing Game

The Bengals produced 302 passing yards compared with Jacksonville’s 271.

Their receiving total was also higher, 317 to 271.

That difference helped compensate for the Bengals’ limited rushing output.

Jacksonville Was More Effective on the Ground

The Jaguars rushed for 139 yards on 27 attempts.

Cincinnati rushed for only 48 yards on 17 attempts.

Jacksonville averaged 5.1 yards per carry compared with Cincinnati’s 2.8.

Both Teams Created Turnovers

Jacksonville recorded three interceptions.

Cincinnati recorded two.

Neither defense recorded an interception touchdown.

Ja’Marr Chase Was the Most Productive Receiver

Chase’s 14 receptions and 165 yards were the highest individual receiving totals highlighted in the game statistics.

Jacksonville Had Strong Defensive Activity

The Jaguars recorded three sacks, six tackles for loss, nine quarterback hits, and three interceptions.

Cincinnati Finished Stronger

The Bengals scored 21 second-half points.

Jacksonville scored 10.

That difference ultimately separated the teams.

What the Player Stats Tell Us About the 31-27 Result

A useful way to understand the game is to stop looking for a single statistic that explains the outcome.

There was no single dominant category that Cincinnati controlled from start to finish.

Jacksonville had:

  • More rushing yards
  • More rushing efficiency
  • More sacks
  • More interceptions
  • More quarterback hits
  • More tackles for loss

Cincinnati had:

  • More passing yards
  • More receiving yards
  • More total passing efficiency by yards per attempt
  • A 21-10 second-half scoring advantage
  • A major individual performance from Ja’Marr Chase

The final result therefore came from the interaction between these categories.

Football games are decided by points, but points are produced through a combination of field position, explosive plays, successful conversions, turnovers, and finishing drives.

The statistics show that Jacksonville created plenty of opportunities. Cincinnati was able to turn enough of its opportunities into points.

How to Read These Statistics Correctly

When researching an individual game, it is easy to focus on the largest number.

For example, Jacksonville’s three interceptions immediately stand out.

But the more complete picture requires comparing several categories at once.

A practical approach is to examine:

  1. Passing volume
  2. Passing efficiency
  3. Rushing efficiency
  4. Receiving production
  5. Turnovers
  6. Pressure statistics
  7. Red-zone and scoring output
  8. Special teams
  9. Quarter-by-quarter scoring

Using this approach prevents one statistic from being treated as the complete story.

For this game, the result becomes clearer when all nine categories are considered together.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the final score between the Jaguars and Bengals?

The Cincinnati Bengals defeated the Jacksonville Jaguars 31-27 on September 14, 2025, during NFL Week 2.

How many passing yards did Trevor Lawrence have?

Trevor Lawrence completed 24 of 42 passes for 271 yards, three touchdowns, and two interceptions.

How many receiving yards did Ja’Marr Chase have?

Ja’Marr Chase recorded 14 receptions for 165 yards and one touchdown on 16 targets.

Who led the Jaguars in rushing?

Travis Etienne Jr. led Jacksonville with 14 carries for 71 yards, averaging 5.1 yards per carry.

How many interceptions did Jacksonville record?

The Jaguars recorded three interceptions. Andrew Wingard, Devin Lloyd, and Eric Murray each recorded one.

Which team had more rushing yards?

Jacksonville had significantly more rushing production. The Jaguars rushed for 139 yards, while Cincinnati recorded 48 rushing yards.

Conclusion

The jacksonville jaguars vs bengals match player stats from September 14, 2025, describe a game in which Cincinnati overcame a difficult statistical profile to win 31-27.

Jacksonville produced 139 rushing yards, recorded three interceptions, and generated three sacks. Trevor Lawrence threw three touchdown passes, while Travis Etienne Jr. led the rushing attack with 71 yards. Parker Washington led Jacksonville’s receivers with 76 yards, and several other offensive players contributed touchdowns.

Cincinnati’s biggest statistical advantage came through the air. The Bengals finished with 302 passing yards and 317 receiving yards. Ja’Marr Chase was the standout receiver with 14 catches for 165 yards and a touchdown, while Tee Higgins added 56 yards and a touchdown.

The Bengals also scored 21 second-half points compared with Jacksonville’s 10. That second-half production transformed a seven-point halftime deficit into a four-point victory.

The game ultimately demonstrates why complete player and team statistics provide more useful context than the final score alone. Jacksonville’s defensive takeaways and rushing production were significant, while Cincinnati’s passing volume, receiving production, and second-half scoring were decisive elements of the 31-27 result.

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *