Brooklyn Nets vs San Antonio Spurs Match Player Stats
The brooklyn nets vs san antonio spurs match player stats from October 26, 2025, tell a clear story about how San Antonio controlled the game through efficient shooting, rebounding, interior defense, and balanced scoring. The Spurs defeated the Nets 118-107 at Frost Bank Center in San Antonio, improving to 3-0 while Brooklyn fell to 0-3. Cam Thomas produced an outstanding 41-point performance for Brooklyn, but Victor Wembanyama answered with 31 points, 14 rebounds, 4 assists, 3 steals, and 6 blocks to lead San Antonio.
The final score does not fully explain how the game developed. San Antonio built a substantial advantage during the opening half, Brooklyn responded strongly in the third quarter, and the Spurs then restored control in the final period. The most important difference was efficiency. San Antonio shot 50% from the field and 44% from three-point range, while Brooklyn finished at 39% from the field and 32% from deep.
This game also featured several performances that deserve attention beyond the leading scorers. Dylan Harper delivered 20 points, 8 assists, 6 rebounds, 2 steals, and a remarkable +33 plus/minus. Keldon Johnson added 19 points and 6 rebounds from the bench. For Brooklyn, Michael Porter Jr. contributed 15 points and 6 rebounds, while Jalen Wilson provided efficient three-point shooting in limited minutes.
Brooklyn Nets vs San Antonio Spurs Match Player Stats
The complete brooklyn nets vs san antonio spurs match player stats provide useful insight into both individual production and team strategy. San Antonio had more players contributing across multiple statistical categories, while Brooklyn relied heavily on Cam Thomas for scoring.
Final Score and Game Information
| Category | Details |
| Matchup | Brooklyn Nets vs. San Antonio Spurs |
| Date | October 26, 2025 |
| Final Score | San Antonio Spurs 118, Brooklyn Nets 107 |
| Venue | Frost Bank Center, San Antonio, Texas |
| Attendance | 19,016 |
| Game Time | 11:00 PM |
| Game ID | 401809960 |
| Season Series | Spurs lead 1-0 |
| Brooklyn Record | 0-3 |
| Brooklyn Away Record | 0-2 |
| San Antonio Record | 3-0 |
| San Antonio Home Record | 1-0 |
The 11-point margin suggests a competitive finish, but San Antonio’s early advantage was important. The Spurs scored 31 points in the first quarter and 38 in the second. Brooklyn therefore entered halftime facing a significant deficit.
The Nets responded with their strongest quarter after halftime, scoring 33 points while holding San Antonio to only 19. That 14-point swing made the contest much closer. However, San Antonio scored 30 points in the fourth quarter and prevented Brooklyn from completing the comeback.
Quarter-by-Quarter Breakdown
| Quarter | Brooklyn Nets | San Antonio Spurs |
| First Quarter | 24 | 31 |
| Second Quarter | 24 | 38 |
| Third Quarter | 33 | 19 |
| Fourth Quarter | 26 | 30 |
| Final | 107 | 118 |
The second quarter was particularly important. San Antonio scored 38 points while Brooklyn managed only 24. A 14-point difference in one quarter created the foundation for the eventual victory.
Brooklyn’s third-quarter response showed that the game was not simply a one-sided performance. The Nets scored 33 points in that period and limited San Antonio to 19. Their defense became more effective, while their offense generated enough scoring opportunities to cut into the deficit.
The fourth quarter ultimately decided the result. Brooklyn scored 26 points, but San Antonio produced 30. Instead of allowing the Nets to continue their momentum, the Spurs responded with another efficient offensive period.
Brooklyn Nets Player Performance
Brooklyn’s offensive production was dominated by Cam Thomas. His 41 points represented a massive share of the team’s total scoring. He also made all 14 of his free-throw attempts, which helped maintain his efficiency despite shooting 11-for-25 from the field.
Cam Thomas
Cam Thomas was clearly Brooklyn’s standout offensive player.
He finished with:
- 41 points
- 11-for-25 field goals
- 5-for-12 three-pointers
- 14-for-14 free throws
- 2 rebounds
- 0 assists
- 3 turnovers
- -7 plus/minus
Thomas demonstrated why high-volume scoring can keep a team competitive even when overall offensive efficiency is below the opponent’s level.
His 14-for-14 performance from the free-throw line was especially notable. Free throws accounted for an important part of his scoring total. He also connected on five three-pointers, giving Brooklyn a combination of perimeter scoring and foul-line production.
However, his offensive workload came with limited involvement in other areas. He recorded no assists and only two rebounds. San Antonio’s more balanced distribution meant that Thomas’s individual scoring brilliance was not enough to overcome the team’s overall statistical disadvantage.
Michael Porter Jr.
Michael Porter Jr. started the game and played 38 minutes, the highest minute total among Brooklyn players.
His line was:
- 15 points
- 5-for-15 field goals
- 3-for-9 three-pointers
- 2-for-3 free throws
- 6 rebounds
- 4 assists
- 0 turnovers
- 2 steals
- -6 plus/minus
Porter Jr. contributed in several areas, especially rebounding and playmaking. His four assists were second only to Ben Saraf among Brooklyn players.
His shooting efficiency, however, was not strong enough to provide the secondary scoring Brooklyn needed. A 5-for-15 shooting night placed additional pressure on Thomas.
Nic Claxton
Nic Claxton finished with 10 points, 5 rebounds, and 2 assists in 26 minutes.
He shot 4-for-7 from the field and 2-for-2 from the free-throw line. That represents efficient scoring, but his -25 plus/minus was one of the weakest figures among Brooklyn’s main rotation players.
Claxton’s individual shooting was efficient, yet San Antonio’s overall size and rebounding advantage remained a major issue for Brooklyn.
Terance Mann
Terance Mann played 31 minutes and recorded:
- 7 points
- 3-for-7 field goals
- 1-for-3 three-pointers
- 6 rebounds
- 3 assists
- 2 steals
- -11 plus/minus
His six rebounds tied Porter Jr. for the team lead. Mann also provided useful defensive activity with two steals.
Still, seven points from 31 minutes meant Brooklyn needed more offensive production elsewhere.
Ben Saraf
Ben Saraf had a difficult shooting night but led Brooklyn in assists.
He recorded:
- 0 points
- 0-for-4 field goals
- 0-for-2 three-pointers
- 1 rebound
- 5 assists
- 1 steal
- 0 turnovers
- -8 plus/minus
The five assists are important because they show that Saraf contributed as a facilitator despite not scoring.
His zero turnovers also stands out. Against a San Antonio team that generated six blocks and strong defensive pressure, protecting possessions was valuable.
Brooklyn’s Bench Production
Brooklyn’s bench had several useful individual contributions.
Jalen Wilson
Jalen Wilson was one of the most efficient Nets players.
He scored 9 points on 3-for-4 shooting and made all three of his three-point attempts. He played only 15 minutes but converted 75% of his field-goal attempts and 100% from deep.
His shooting gave Brooklyn an efficient scoring option away from Thomas.
Ziaire Williams
Ziaire Williams recorded:
- 5 points
- 1-for-4 field goals
- 1-for-4 three-pointers
- 2-for-2 free throws
- 1 rebound
- 1 steal
- -1 plus/minus
His relatively modest -1 plus/minus indicates that his minutes were not damaging in terms of the game’s scoring margin.
Noah Clowney
Noah Clowney played 24 minutes and scored 7 points.
He shot 2-for-8 from the field and 2-for-7 from three-point range. He also added 3 rebounds and 2 assists.
The volume from outside was noticeable, but the shooting percentage limited the overall offensive impact.
Day’Ron Sharpe
Day’Ron Sharpe produced an interesting statistical line.
He had:
- 6 points
- 3-for-4 field goals
- 3 rebounds
- 1 assist
- 4 turnovers
- 2 steals
- +15 plus/minus
Sharpe’s +15 was one of Brooklyn’s strongest plus/minus figures. His four turnovers were a clear negative, but his impact during his minutes was still positive according to the scoring margin.
Tyrese Martin
Tyrese Martin scored 4 points in 12 minutes while adding 2 rebounds and 3 assists.
He shot 1-for-4 from the field and finished with a +2 plus/minus.
Egor Demin
Egor Demin played 19 minutes and recorded 3 points, 4 rebounds, and 1 assist.
He shot 1-for-5 from the field and 1-for-5 from three-point range. His four rebounds were useful, but the shooting struggles reduced his offensive contribution.
San Antonio Spurs Player Performance
San Antonio’s biggest advantage was its balance. The Victor Wembanyama led the team in scoring, but the Spurs also received strong contributions from Dylan Harper, Keldon Johnson, Devin Vassell, Julian Champagnie, and Stephon Castle.
Victor Wembanyama
Victor Wembanyama delivered the most complete individual performance of the game.
His statistics were:
- 31 points
- 9-for-21 field goals
- 3-for-6 three-pointers
- 10-for-15 free throws
- 14 rebounds
- 4 assists
- 2 turnovers
- 3 steals
- 6 blocks
- +13 plus/minus
The six blocks were especially significant. Brooklyn finished with zero blocks as a team, while Wembanyama alone recorded six.
His 14 rebounds also helped San Antonio establish a 45-34 advantage on the glass.
Wembanyama was not simply a scorer. He influenced the game in nearly every major statistical category. His combination of scoring, rebounding, passing, steals, and rim protection gave San Antonio a two-way foundation.
Dylan Harper
Dylan Harper produced one of the most impressive performances in the game.
He recorded:
- 20 points
- 8-for-11 field goals
- 4-for-4 free throws
- 6 rebounds
- 8 assists
- 0 turnovers
- 2 steals
- +33 plus/minus
His 8 assists led San Antonio, while his 20 points ranked second on the team.
The most striking number was his +33 plus/minus. It was the best figure recorded by any player in the game.
Harper also shot 8-for-11 from the field. That combination of efficiency, passing, rebounding, and ball security made his contribution particularly valuable.
Keldon Johnson
Keldon Johnson supplied 19 points and 6 rebounds in 29 minutes.
He shot:
- 5-for-9 from the field
- 2-for-4 from three-point range
- 7-for-7 from the free-throw line
His perfect free-throw shooting helped San Antonio maintain scoring efficiency.
Johnson also finished with a +19 plus/minus, showing that his contribution extended beyond raw scoring.
Devin Vassell
Devin Vassell scored 16 points in 35 minutes.
He shot 6-for-12 from the field and 4-for-6 from three-point range.
His four made three-pointers were an important part of San Antonio’s perimeter success. He also added 3 rebounds, 1 assist, 2 turnovers, and 1 steal.
A +12 plus/minus further reflected his positive impact.
Julian Champagnie
Julian Champagnie delivered an efficient 13-point performance.
He made 4 of 5 field-goal attempts and 3 of 4 three-point attempts. He also converted 2 of 3 free throws and grabbed 6 rebounds.
The combination of efficient perimeter shooting and rebounding gave San Antonio another productive starting option.
Stephon Castle
Stephon Castle recorded 13 points, 6 rebounds, and 3 assists.
He shot 5-for-10 from the field and 3-for-5 from the free-throw line.
His five turnovers were a concern, and his -7 plus/minus was the lowest among San Antonio’s primary starters. Still, his scoring and rebounding added useful production.
Spurs Bench Performance
San Antonio’s bench played a major role in maintaining its advantage.
Keldon Johnson led the reserves with 19 points. Dylan Harper added 20 points and 8 assists, giving the second unit an important offensive and playmaking boost.
Carter Bryant scored 2 points in five minutes and made both of his free throws.
Bismack Biyombo played 12 minutes and recorded one rebound. Jordan McLaughlin played seven minutes and finished without a point, rebound, assist, or turnover.
The key difference was that San Antonio did not need every bench player to score heavily. Its primary rotation already provided enough balanced production.
Team Statistical Comparison
The team statistics reveal why San Antonio won despite Brooklyn having a 41-point performance from Thomas.
| Statistic | Brooklyn Nets | San Antonio Spurs |
| Field Goals | 34-87 | 39-78 |
| Field Goal Percentage | 39% | 50% |
| Three-Pointers | 16-50 | 12-27 |
| Three-Point Percentage | 32% | 44% |
| Free Throws | 23-24 | 28-36 |
| Free-Throw Percentage | 96% | 78% |
| Rebounds | 34 | 45 |
| Assists | 22 | 20 |
| Turnovers | 11 | 12 |
| Steals | 9 | 7 |
| Blocks | 0 | 6 |
Several numbers immediately stand out.
San Antonio Won the Shooting Efficiency Battle
The Spurs shot 50% from the field compared with 39% for Brooklyn.
That 11-percentage-point difference is substantial over an entire game.
San Antonio also shot 44% from three-point range, compared with Brooklyn’s 32%. Although Brooklyn made more three-pointers in total, the Spurs converted their attempts at a much higher rate.
San Antonio Controlled the Rebounding Battle
The Spurs collected 45 rebounds compared with 34 for Brooklyn.
That 11-rebound advantage created additional possessions and limited Brooklyn’s ability to control the game through second chances.
Wembanyama’s 14 rebounds were central to that difference.
Brooklyn Was Excellent at the Free-Throw Line
Brooklyn converted 23 of 24 free throws for a remarkable 96%.
San Antonio made 28 of 36 for 78%.
This was one area where Brooklyn clearly outperformed the Spurs. However, San Antonio’s superior field-goal and three-point efficiency outweighed the Nets’ advantage at the line.
San Antonio Owned the Rim Protection Battle
Perhaps the most obvious defensive difference was blocks.
Brooklyn recorded zero blocks.
San Antonio recorded six, with Wembanyama responsible for all six.
That difference illustrates how the Spurs could challenge Brooklyn’s attempts near the basket without relying entirely on perimeter defense.
What the Numbers Say About the Game
The statistical profile suggests that San Antonio won through efficiency and balance rather than depending on one player.
Wembanyama was the star, but he was not isolated from the rest of the offense. Harper created scoring opportunities and maintained possession quality. Johnson supplied efficient bench scoring. Vassell stretched the floor with four three-pointers.
Brooklyn had a different structure.
Thomas carried a huge scoring burden. Porter Jr. supplied secondary production, while several other Nets players contributed modest totals. The result was a greater dependence on one high-volume scorer.
That difference matters because a team can survive a superstar scoring night when the opponent’s overall efficiency is significantly higher.
Why Cam Thomas’ 41 Points Were Not Enough
A 41-point performance normally places a team in a strong position to win.
However, individual scoring totals must be viewed alongside efficiency, playmaking, rebounding, and defensive impact.
Thomas scored 41 points but recorded no assists and two rebounds. His three turnovers also represented lost possessions.
Meanwhile, Wembanyama scored 31 points while adding 14 rebounds, 4 assists, 3 steals, and 6 blocks.
Harper added 20 points and 8 assists without committing a turnover.
Johnson contributed 19 points and 6 rebounds.
This is the clearest explanation for the result. Brooklyn had the game’s highest individual scorer, but San Antonio had the stronger overall collection of performances.
The Third Quarter Almost Changed the Game
The third quarter deserves special attention.
Brooklyn scored 33 points while San Antonio scored only 19.
That 14-point advantage dramatically changed the game’s momentum.
The Nets appeared capable of turning the contest into a close fourth-quarter battle. Their offense improved, while the Spurs struggled to maintain the efficiency they displayed during the first half.
However, San Antonio did not allow that momentum to continue.
The Spurs scored 30 points in the fourth quarter. Brooklyn managed 26.
That response was critical. Instead of allowing the Nets to complete the comeback, San Antonio restored its offensive rhythm and closed the game.
Most Important Individual Statistical Leaders
The game’s leading statistical performers can be summarized as follows:
| Category | Player | Team | Result |
| Points | Cam Thomas | Nets | 41 |
| Rebounds | Victor Wembanyama | Spurs | 14 |
| Assists | Dylan Harper | Spurs | 8 |
| Steals | Victor Wembanyama | Spurs | 3 |
| Blocks | Victor Wembanyama | Spurs | 6 |
| Plus/Minus | Dylan Harper | Spurs | +33 |
This table shows the contrast between individual scoring and all-around influence.
Thomas led everyone in points, but Wembanyama dominated the defensive statistics and rebounding. Harper produced the strongest plus/minus figure while also leading San Antonio in assists.
Players Who Made the Biggest Difference
Victor Wembanyama
Wembanyama was the most complete player on the court. His 31 points were only one part of his contribution. The 14 rebounds and six blocks directly addressed two areas where San Antonio dominated.
Dylan Harper
Harper’s +33 plus/minus deserves particular attention. He combined 20 points with eight assists, six rebounds, two steals, and zero turnovers.
His efficiency and ball security helped San Antonio maintain control.
Keldon Johnson
Johnson’s 19 points from the bench were important because San Antonio did not need to depend exclusively on its starters.
His 7-for-7 free-throw shooting also gave the Spurs reliable scoring opportunities.
Cam Thomas
Thomas deserves recognition even in a losing effort. His 41 points represented an exceptional scoring performance.
He also made five three-pointers and all 14 free throws.
The problem for Brooklyn was not Thomas’s scoring alone. The issue was that the rest of the team could not consistently match San Antonio’s efficiency and two-way production.
What Brooklyn Could Improve
The numbers point toward several areas Brooklyn would need to address.
Improve Overall Shot Selection
Brooklyn attempted 50 three-pointers and made 16.
That resulted in a 32% three-point percentage.
The team did have several efficient perimeter shooters, including Jalen Wilson, who made all three of his attempts. However, the overall shooting efficiency was not strong enough.
Find More Secondary Creation
Thomas scored 41 points but had no assists.
Porter Jr. had four assists and Saraf had five, but Brooklyn still needed more consistent creation from multiple players.
A balanced offense would reduce the pressure on Thomas to carry the scoring load.
Compete Better on the Glass
The 45-34 rebounding deficit was significant.
Brooklyn’s leading rebounders, Porter Jr. and Mann, each had six. Wembanyama alone had 14 for San Antonio.
Winning more possessions through rebounding would have helped Brooklyn limit San Antonio’s offensive opportunities.
Challenge Shots at the Rim
Brooklyn recorded zero blocks.
San Antonio recorded six.
Not every defensive improvement requires blocks, but the difference indicates that the Spurs had a major rim-protection advantage.
What San Antonio Could Build On
San Antonio’s performance offered several positive indicators.
The team shot 50% from the field and 44% from three-point range. It also outrebounded Brooklyn by 11 and produced six blocks.
More importantly, the scoring was distributed.
Wembanyama scored 31.
Harper scored 20.
Johnson scored 19.
Vassell scored 16.
Champagnie and Castle each scored 13.
That balance makes it difficult for an opponent to focus defensive attention on one scorer.
Brooklyn Nets vs San Antonio Spurs Match Player Stats: Key Takeaways
The brooklyn nets vs san antonio spurs match player stats show that this was a classic example of individual scoring brilliance being overcome by superior team efficiency.
The biggest lessons from the box score are straightforward:
- Cam Thomas led all players with 41 points.
- Victor Wembanyama delivered a complete two-way performance.
- Dylan Harper led San Antonio with 8 assists and finished at +33.
- San Antonio shot 50% from the field.
- The Spurs shot 44% from three-point range.
- San Antonio outrebounded Brooklyn 45-34.
- Wembanyama recorded all six of San Antonio’s blocks.
- Brooklyn shot 96% from the free-throw line.
- Brooklyn’s third-quarter comeback attempt fell short.
- San Antonio finished the game with a 118-107 victory.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who scored the most points in the Brooklyn Nets vs San Antonio Spurs game?
Cam Thomas led all players with 41 points for Brooklyn. He shot 11-for-25 from the field, made five three-pointers, and converted all 14 free throws.
How many points did Victor Wembanyama score?
Victor Wembanyama scored 31 points. He also recorded 14 rebounds, 4 assists, 3 steals, and 6 blocks.
Who had the most rebounds in the game?
Victor Wembanyama led all players with 14 rebounds. Michael Porter Jr. and Terance Mann led Brooklyn with six rebounds each.
Who led the Spurs in assists?
Dylan Harper led San Antonio with 8 assists. He also scored 20 points, collected six rebounds, recorded two steals, and finished with zero turnovers.
What was the final score?
The San Antonio Spurs defeated the Brooklyn Nets 118-107 on October 26, 2025, at Frost Bank Center.
Which team shot better from the field?
San Antonio shot 50% from the field, while Brooklyn shot 39%. The Spurs also had the better three-point percentage at 44% compared with Brooklyn’s 32%.
Conclusion
The brooklyn nets vs san antonio spurs match player stats provide a detailed explanation of why San Antonio won 118-107 despite Cam Thomas producing 41 points.
The decisive factors were team efficiency, rebounding, rim protection, and balanced scoring. San Antonio shot 50% from the field, made 44% of its three-point attempts, and collected 45 rebounds. The Spurs also recorded six blocks compared with none for Brooklyn.
Wembanyama was the central figure with 31 points, 14 rebounds, 4 assists, 3 steals, and 6 blocks. However, Dylan Harper’s 20-point, 8-assist performance and +33 plus/minus showed the importance of San Antonio’s supporting cast. Keldon Johnson, Devin Vassell, Julian Champagnie, and Stephon Castle also contributed meaningful production.
Brooklyn’s performance had its own bright spots. Thomas’s 41 points were exceptional, while Porter Jr., Saraf, Wilson, and others provided useful contributions. The third-quarter comeback also demonstrated that the Nets could respond after a difficult first half.
Ultimately, San Antonio’s statistical balance proved more important than Brooklyn’s individual scoring advantage. The Spurs entered the game 3-0, and this victory gave them a strong early-season result while Brooklyn dropped to 0-3.
