76ers vs San Antonio Spurs Match Player Stats
The 76ers vs san antonio spurs match player stats from March 4, 2026, tell the story of one of San Antonio’s most dominant performances of the season. The Spurs defeated the Philadelphia 76ers 131-91 at Xfinity Mobile Arena in Philadelphia, turning the game into a 40-point statement victory. San Antonio shot 55% from the field, made 40% of its three-point attempts, controlled the rebounding battle, and produced 36 assists. Philadelphia, by comparison, shot only 35% overall and 24% from three-point range.
The final score alone explains the result, but the individual numbers provide a much clearer picture of how the game unfolded. Devin Vassell led San Antonio with 22 points, while Dylan Harper also scored 22 off the bench. Stephon Castle contributed 15 points and 10 assists, giving the Spurs a double-double built around playmaking rather than scoring alone. Victor Wembanyama finished with 10 points, 8 rebounds, and 6 blocks, showing how much defensive influence he had even without leading the team in scoring.
For Philadelphia, Tyrese Maxey finished with 21 points and 8 rebounds, while Jabari Walker added 20 points and 7 rebounds. Those individual efforts, however, could not overcome the team’s shooting struggles and San Antonio’s offensive efficiency.
This breakdown examines the complete 76ers vs san antonio spurs match player stats, explains the major statistical differences, and looks at what the numbers reveal about the performance of both teams.
Game Overview
The matchup took place on March 4, 2026, at Xfinity Mobile Arena in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. A crowd of 19,746 watched San Antonio produce a convincing road victory.
The Spurs entered the game with a 44-17 record, including a 23-11 record away from home. Philadelphia came into the contest at 33-28, with a 16-16 home record.
San Antonio’s 131-91 victory improved the importance of the statistical comparison because the Spurs did not simply win a close contest. They controlled the game across several major categories.
Final Score
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
| San Antonio Spurs | 32 | 46 | 35 | 18 | 131 |
| Philadelphia 76ers | 25 | 28 | 11 | 27 | 91 |
The second quarter was particularly important. San Antonio scored 46 points while Philadelphia managed 28. The Spurs then extended the advantage dramatically in the third quarter, outscoring the 76ers 35-11.
That 24-point third-quarter difference effectively decided the contest.
Philadelphia did recover slightly in the fourth quarter, winning that period 27-18, but by then the game had already moved beyond reach.
76ers vs san antonio spurs match player stats
Looking directly at the player numbers provides useful context behind the 40-point difference.
San Antonio Spurs Player Leaders
| Player | Points | Rebounds | Assists | Blocks |
| Devin Vassell | 22 | Not provided | Not provided | Not provided |
| Dylan Harper | 22 | Not provided | Not provided | Not provided |
| Stephon Castle | 15 | Not provided | 10 | Not provided |
| Keldon Johnson | 12 | 9 | Not provided | Not provided |
| Carter Bryant | 11 | 9 | Not provided | Not provided |
| De’Aaron Fox | 11 | Not provided | 7 | Not provided |
| Victor Wembanyama | 10 | 8 | Not provided | 6 |
The scoring was well distributed.
Devin Vassell and Dylan Harper both reached 22 points, giving San Antonio two players capable of producing major offensive output. Castle’s 15 points and 10 assists added another layer to the offense.
Wembanyama’s scoring total was comparatively modest, but his six blocks were arguably more important to the overall defensive picture.
Philadelphia 76ers Player Leaders
| Player | Points | Rebounds |
| Tyrese Maxey | 21 | 8 |
| Jabari Walker | 20 | 7 |
| Trendon Watford | 9 | Not provided |
Maxey and Walker were responsible for most of Philadelphia’s biggest scoring contributions listed in the supplied statistics.
Maxey’s 21 points represented a strong individual scoring performance, particularly considering that the team as a whole scored only 91 points. Walker’s 20 points were similarly significant.
The problem was that Philadelphia did not receive enough overall offensive production to compete with San Antonio’s balanced attack.
San Antonio’s Offensive Efficiency
One of the clearest differences in the game was shooting.
The Spurs made 49 of 89 field-goal attempts, which equates to approximately 55%. Philadelphia made only 33 of 95 attempts, or approximately 35%.
That creates a massive efficiency gap.
San Antonio attempted six fewer field goals than Philadelphia but made 16 more shots.
That statistic is especially important because it demonstrates that the Spurs did not need excessive volume to generate their scoring advantage. They simply converted their opportunities at a much higher rate.
Three-Point Shooting
The three-point numbers continued the same trend.
San Antonio:
- 18-of-45 from three
- 40% three-point shooting
- 54 three-point percentage points from the field were not applicable, but the 40% conversion rate was a major offensive advantage
Philadelphia:
- 10-of-42 from three
- 24% three-point shooting
The Spurs made eight more three-pointers despite taking only three additional attempts.
That is a major difference in a modern NBA game.
When one team shoots 40% from outside while the other shoots 24%, the scoring margin can expand rapidly, particularly when the more accurate team is also generating efficient two-point opportunities.
Free Throw Shooting Was Not the Main Difference
Both teams performed reasonably well from the free-throw line.
San Antonio made 15 of 18 attempts, good for approximately 83%.
Philadelphia made 15 of 19, approximately 79%.
Philadelphia actually attempted one more free throw than San Antonio and made the same number.
This tells us something important about the game. The 40-point margin was not primarily caused by free throws.
The decisive factors were field-goal efficiency, three-point shooting, rebounding, passing, and San Antonio’s defensive impact.
Devin Vassell’s 22-Point Performance
Devin Vassell was one of San Antonio’s leading scorers, finishing with 22 points.
His scoring output tied Dylan Harper for the team lead based on the supplied statistics.
What makes the number particularly important is how it fit into San Antonio’s broader offensive distribution. The Spurs were not dependent on one player to carry the scoring load.
Vassell provided 22 points.
Harper provided another 22.
Castle added 15.
Johnson contributed 12.
Bryant added 11.
Fox scored 11.
Wembanyama scored 10.
That distribution illustrates why Philadelphia had difficulty slowing San Antonio down.
If a defense focuses too heavily on one scoring option, other players can take advantage of the additional space and opportunities.
Dylan Harper’s Bench Impact
Dylan Harper’s 22 points were another major factor in the Spurs’ performance.
His production from the bench is particularly noteworthy because San Antonio received substantial scoring from its reserves.
Keldon Johnson added 12 points and 9 rebounds.
Carter Bryant contributed 11 points and 9 rebounds.
Harper added 22 points.
This gave San Antonio valuable production beyond its starting group.
Bench scoring can have an important psychological and tactical effect in a game. When reserves enter and maintain or increase an advantage, the opposing team’s starters can struggle to find opportunities to change momentum.
San Antonio’s bench production helped keep the offensive pressure high.
Stephon Castle’s Double-Double
Stephon Castle finished with 15 points and 10 assists.
The 10 assists are especially significant because San Antonio recorded 36 assists as a team.
That means Castle was a major contributor to an offense that consistently created scoring opportunities for teammates.
A double-double based on 15 points and 10 assists is different from a high-scoring performance. Castle’s value came from connecting different parts of the offense.
His passing helped distribute opportunities among Vassell, Harper, Johnson, Bryant, Wembanyama, and Fox.
The team result supports the importance of that playmaking.
San Antonio finished with 36 assists while Philadelphia recorded only 20.
That 16-assist advantage is one of the clearest indicators of the difference in offensive organization.
Victor Wembanyama’s Defensive Influence
Victor Wembanyama scored 10 points and grabbed 8 rebounds, but his six blocks stand out.
Six blocks in a single game represent a substantial defensive presence.
Even when a player does not directly record a block, a strong rim protector can influence offensive decisions. Players may alter shots, avoid driving lanes, or pass out of situations because they know a shot blocker is nearby.
Wembanyama’s six blocks therefore need to be viewed as part of a broader defensive performance rather than as an isolated statistic.
San Antonio finished with 10 blocks as a team.
Philadelphia had five.
The Spurs also recorded 10 steals compared with eight for the 76ers.
Those numbers show that San Antonio was active both around the basket and on the perimeter.
Tyrese Maxey’s 21 Points
Tyrese Maxey led Philadelphia with 21 points and 8 rebounds.
His scoring total was only one point below the combined scoring output of some of San Antonio’s secondary contributors, but Philadelphia needed more overall production.
Maxey’s individual performance should not be judged solely by the final score.
A player can produce 20 or more points while still being part of an offense that struggles as a whole. The surrounding efficiency, shot distribution, turnovers, and defensive performance all influence the outcome.
In this game, Philadelphia’s 35% field-goal shooting created an uphill battle for every major scorer.
Jabari Walker Provides 20 Points
Jabari Walker scored 20 points and grabbed 7 rebounds.
That was one of Philadelphia’s strongest individual performances.
Walker and Maxey combined for 41 points, meaning the two players accounted for nearly half of Philadelphia’s 91 total points.
However, the team needed additional efficient scoring from the rest of the roster.
San Antonio’s scoring distribution was much broader, with seven listed contributors reaching double figures.
That difference in offensive balance was critical.
Team Shooting Comparison
The shooting statistics provide perhaps the simplest explanation of the result.
| Category | Spurs | 76ers |
| Field Goals | 49-89 | 33-95 |
| Field Goal % | 55% | 35% |
| Three-Pointers | 18-45 | 10-42 |
| Three-Point % | 40% | 24% |
| Free Throws | 15-18 | 15-19 |
| Free Throw % | 83% | 79% |
San Antonio made 16 more field goals.
It also made eight more three-pointers.
At the same time, Philadelphia attempted six more total field goals.
This is a classic example of why shot volume alone does not determine offensive success.
The 76ers generated more field-goal attempts, but the Spurs converted their chances far more efficiently.
Rebounding Battle
San Antonio also won the rebounding battle.
The Spurs collected 56 rebounds.
Philadelphia collected 40.
That is a 16-rebound advantage.
Rebounding matters because it influences both ends of the court.
Offensive rebounds can create second chances.
Defensive rebounds end possessions and allow a team to transition into offense.
The overall rebounding advantage helped San Antonio control possession and limited Philadelphia’s opportunities to compensate for its shooting struggles.
Keldon Johnson and Carter Bryant
Keldon Johnson finished with 12 points and 9 rebounds.
Carter Bryant recorded 11 points and 9 rebounds.
Both players came within one rebound of double-doubles.
Their rebounding contributions were important because San Antonio’s overall advantage was not dependent on Wembanyama alone.
That is a useful detail when analyzing the game. The Spurs’ 56 rebounds came from a collective effort.
Assist Differential Shows the Difference in Ball Movement
San Antonio recorded 36 assists.
Philadelphia recorded 20.
The 16-assist difference is enormous.
It suggests that San Antonio consistently created scoring opportunities through passing and ball movement.
The Spurs’ offensive structure allowed multiple players to become scoring threats.
Castle led the team with 10 assists, while Fox added 7.
Together, those two players accounted for 17 assists.
That is nearly half of San Antonio’s team total.
The combination of Castle’s 10 assists and Fox’s 7 assists was particularly important because it allowed San Antonio’s scoring talent to remain involved.
Turnovers and Possession Efficiency
The Spurs committed 15 turnovers.
Philadelphia committed 13.
At first glance, this is one area where Philadelphia actually had a slight advantage.
However, the two-turnover difference was nowhere near large enough to offset the massive shooting and rebounding gaps.
This is a valuable reminder when studying 76ers vs san antonio spurs match player stats. No single statistic should be viewed in isolation.
Philadelphia protected the ball slightly better, but its poor shooting meant that many possessions still ended without points.
San Antonio turned the ball over more often, but its efficiency when it did get shots off was substantially higher.
Defensive Statistics
The Spurs recorded:
- 10 steals
- 10 blocks
- 56 rebounds
Philadelphia recorded:
- 8 steals
- 5 blocks
- 40 rebounds
The defensive difference was especially visible around the basket.
San Antonio doubled Philadelphia’s block total.
Wembanyama alone recorded six blocks, which was more than Philadelphia’s entire team total.
The Spurs also had a two-steal advantage.
Combined with their rebounding edge, these statistics demonstrate that San Antonio was able to affect Philadelphia’s offense in several ways.
Quarter-by-Quarter Breakdown
First Quarter
San Antonio opened the game with 32 points.
Philadelphia scored 25.
The seven-point Spurs advantage was meaningful but not decisive.
At that stage, Philadelphia remained within striking distance.
Second Quarter
The game changed dramatically in the second period.
San Antonio scored 46 points.
Philadelphia scored 28.
The Spurs added 18 points to their lead during the quarter.
A 46-point quarter indicates outstanding offensive execution.
By halftime, the game had moved significantly in San Antonio’s direction.
Third Quarter
The third quarter was even more damaging for Philadelphia.
San Antonio scored 35 points.
Philadelphia scored only 11.
The 24-point difference in the period effectively removed any realistic comeback opportunity.
Philadelphia’s 11-point quarter was the lowest-scoring period by either team.
Fourth Quarter
Philadelphia responded in the final period, scoring 27 points.
San Antonio scored 18.
The 76ers therefore won the fourth-quarter scoring battle by nine points.
However, the earlier damage was too significant to overcome.
The fourth-quarter result demonstrates why looking only at the final period can sometimes be misleading. Philadelphia showed improved scoring late, but the game had already been decided.
Why the Spurs Won by 40 Points
The biggest margin in the game was 40 points.
Several factors explain it.
1. Superior Field-Goal Efficiency
San Antonio shot 55%.
Philadelphia shot 35%.
A 20-percentage-point gap in field-goal shooting is enormous.
2. Better Three-Point Conversion
The Spurs shot 40% from three.
The 76ers shot 24%.
San Antonio made 18 threes compared with Philadelphia’s 10.
3. Rebounding Advantage
San Antonio won the rebounding battle 56-40.
The 16-rebound advantage helped the Spurs control possessions.
4. Better Ball Movement
San Antonio produced 36 assists.
Philadelphia had 20.
The 16-assist difference illustrates how effectively the Spurs shared the ball.
5. Defensive Rim Protection
San Antonio recorded 10 blocks.
Wembanyama accounted for six.
Philadelphia recorded five team blocks.
6. Balanced Scoring
The Spurs had multiple players producing double-digit scoring performances.
Philadelphia’s listed scoring leaders were concentrated around Maxey and Walker.
The Importance of the Second and Third Quarters
If one wanted to identify the most important stretch of the game, the answer would be the second and third quarters.
San Antonio scored 81 points across those two periods.
Philadelphia scored 39.
That means the Spurs outscored the 76ers by 42 points during those 24 minutes.
The final margin was 40 points, so the second and third quarters essentially explain the entire contest.
This is a more useful analytical observation than simply saying San Antonio dominated.
It identifies exactly when the game moved away from Philadelphia.
Comparing the Team Profiles
The statistics suggest two very different offensive profiles.
San Antonio operated through balanced scoring, high shooting efficiency, strong passing, and interior defense.
Philadelphia relied more heavily on individual scoring contributions while struggling to convert shots efficiently.
The difference becomes clear when combining several categories.
San Antonio:
- 131 points
- 55% field-goal shooting
- 40% three-point shooting
- 36 assists
- 56 rebounds
- 10 steals
- 10 blocks
Philadelphia:
- 91 points
- 35% field-goal shooting
- 24% three-point shooting
- 20 assists
- 40 rebounds
- 8 steals
- 5 blocks
The comparison is remarkably consistent. San Antonio was better in almost every major team category except turnovers, where Philadelphia had a small advantage.
What the Player Statistics Reveal
Individual statistics are most useful when they are connected to the team result.
Vassell’s 22 points helped provide efficient scoring.
Harper’s 22 points gave San Antonio major bench production.
Castle’s 15 points and 10 assists showed his importance as a facilitator.
Fox’s 11 points and 7 assists added another playmaking option.
Wembanyama’s 10 points, 8 rebounds, and 6 blocks demonstrated defensive influence.
Johnson and Bryant each provided strong rebounding support.
For Philadelphia, Maxey’s 21 points and Walker’s 20 points represented strong individual contributions, but they were not enough to offset the team’s overall efficiency problems.
This is why a box score should be analyzed as a system rather than as a list of isolated numbers.
Season Context
San Antonio entered the matchup with a 44-17 record and a 23-11 road record.
Philadelphia entered at 33-28 and was 16-16 at home.
The records provide useful context for the result.
San Antonio had already demonstrated strong performance away from home, and this matchup continued that trend.
Philadelphia, meanwhile, entered with a .500 home record based on the supplied 16-16 mark.
The game therefore reflected a broader difference in season performance rather than appearing completely disconnected from the teams’ records.
Season Series Result
The March 4 matchup gave San Antonio a 1-0 lead in the season series.
The teams later met again on April 7, 2026, with Philadelphia losing 115-102.
That later result means San Antonio ultimately demonstrated an ability to beat Philadelphia in both matchups supplied in the data.
The second game was much closer than the March contest, which makes the 40-point result on March 4 particularly striking.
What Changed Between the Teams’ Performances?
The March 4 game should not be interpreted as evidence that every future matchup would produce a similar margin.
Basketball results can change because of shooting variance, rotations, injuries, defensive adjustments, pace, and game-specific execution.
However, the March statistics clearly identify areas where San Antonio had a major advantage.
The Spurs’ 55% shooting and 40% three-point accuracy were outstanding.
Philadelphia’s 35% field-goal shooting and 24% three-point shooting were the opposite.
Those differences are large enough to create a major score gap even without an extreme turnover disparity.
A Practical Way to Read This Box Score
For readers who want to understand player statistics rather than simply record them, a useful approach is to work through five questions.
Who scored the most?
Devin Vassell and Dylan Harper both scored 22 points for San Antonio.
Tyrese Maxey led Philadelphia with 21 points.
Who controlled the boards?
San Antonio collected 56 rebounds compared with Philadelphia’s 40.
Keldon Johnson and Carter Bryant each grabbed 9 rebounds, while Wembanyama had 8.
Who created the offense?
Stephon Castle led the Spurs with 10 assists.
De’Aaron Fox added 7.
San Antonio finished with 36 team assists.
Who made the biggest defensive impact?
Wembanyama’s six blocks were the standout defensive number.
San Antonio had 10 blocks overall.
Which team was more efficient?
San Antonio was clearly more efficient.
The Spurs shot 55% from the field and 40% from three, compared with Philadelphia’s 35% and 24%.
Key Takeaways From the Match
The most important lessons from the 76ers vs san antonio spurs match player stats can be summarized through the following numbers:
- San Antonio won 131-91.
- The Spurs won by 40 points.
- San Antonio shot 55% from the field.
- Philadelphia shot 35%.
- San Antonio made 18 three-pointers.
- Philadelphia made 10 three-pointers.
- The Spurs won the rebounding battle 56-40.
- San Antonio recorded 36 assists.
- Philadelphia recorded 20 assists.
- Wembanyama recorded 6 blocks.
- Vassell and Harper each scored 22 points.
- Maxey scored 21 points for Philadelphia.
- Walker scored 20 points for Philadelphia.
- Castle recorded 15 points and 10 assists.
- The Spurs led the season series 1-0 after this matchup.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the final score between the 76ers and Spurs on March 4, 2026?
The San Antonio Spurs defeated the Philadelphia 76ers 131-91 at Xfinity Mobile Arena in Philadelphia.
Who led the Spurs in scoring?
Devin Vassell and Dylan Harper both scored 22 points, tying for the highest scoring total among the supplied Spurs player statistics.
Who led the 76ers in scoring?
Tyrese Maxey led Philadelphia with 21 points and also recorded 8 rebounds.
How many points did Victor Wembanyama score?
Victor Wembanyama scored 10 points. He also recorded 8 rebounds and 6 blocks.
How many assists did Stephon Castle have?
Stephon Castle recorded 10 assists along with 15 points, giving him a double-double.
Why did San Antonio win by 40 points?
The main statistical reasons were San Antonio’s 55% field-goal shooting, 40% three-point shooting, 56 rebounds, 36 assists, and 10 blocks. Philadelphia shot only 35% overall and 24% from three.
Conclusion
The 76ers vs san antonio spurs match player stats from March 4, 2026, show a game decided by efficiency, balance, and defensive control.
San Antonio’s 131-91 victory was built on far more than one star performance. Vassell and Harper each scored 22 points, Castle delivered 10 assists, Fox added 7 assists, Johnson and Bryant contributed heavily on the boards, and Wembanyama protected the rim with six blocks.
Philadelphia had meaningful individual contributions from Maxey and Walker, who scored 21 and 20 points respectively. Yet the 76ers struggled to turn their opportunities into points. Their 35% field-goal shooting and 24% three-point shooting made it extremely difficult to keep pace with a Spurs offense operating at 55% from the field.
The rebounding and assist margins further explain the result. San Antonio controlled the boards by 16 rebounds and finished with 16 more assists. The Spurs also produced twice as many blocks as Philadelphia.
The quarter-by-quarter numbers reveal when the contest became decisive. San Antonio’s 46-point second quarter and 35-point third quarter created a separation that Philadelphia could not overcome. Although the 76ers responded with a stronger fourth quarter, the game had already been determined.
Ultimately, the statistical profile of this matchup is unusually clear. San Antonio combined efficient shooting, balanced scoring, strong playmaking, rebounding, and rim protection to produce one of its most emphatic victories of the season.
