Los Angeles Chargers vs Las Vegas Raiders Match Player Stats
The los angeles chargers vs las vegas raiders match player stats tell the story of a game in which Justin Herbert and the Chargers offense consistently created better opportunities, turning a competitive opening half into a convincing 34-20 victory. The matchup, officially listed by ESPN as January 5, 2025, finished with Los Angeles scoring 14 points in both the second and fourth quarters while Las Vegas answered with only seven points in each of those periods.
The final score was not simply the result of one explosive performance. Herbert completed 28 of 36 passes for 346 yards, two touchdowns and no interceptions, while Quentin Johnston produced a massive 186 receiving yards on 13 catches. Ladd McConkey added 95 yards, and the Chargers finished with 346 passing yards and 137 rushing yards.
Las Vegas had productive individual performances of its own. Aidan O’Connell completed 24 of 34 passes for 214 yards, two touchdowns and one interception. Jakobi Meyers led the Raiders with 123 receiving yards and a touchdown, while rookie tight end Brock Bowers finished with 50 yards and a late touchdown.
Yet the overall statistical picture favored Los Angeles. The Chargers controlled possession situations more effectively, generated more offensive yardage, and finished drives with greater consistency. Their rushing attack was not dominant on a per-carry basis, but it helped keep the Raiders defense honest and contributed to a balanced offensive performance.
Los Angeles Chargers vs Las Vegas Raiders Match Player Stats at a Glance
| Category | Chargers | Raiders |
| Final Score | 34 | 20 |
| Passing Yards | 346 | 225 |
| Rushing Yards | 137 | 39 |
| Total Passing Completions | 28 | 25 |
| Passing Touchdowns | 2 | 2 |
| Interceptions Thrown | 0 | 1 |
| Rushing Touchdowns | 1 | 0 |
| Field Goals | 4/5 | 2/2 |
| Total Points | 34 | 20 |
The biggest difference is immediately visible in the ground game. Los Angeles rushed for 137 yards on 35 attempts, averaging 3.9 yards per carry. Las Vegas managed only 39 rushing yards on 12 attempts, averaging 3.3 yards per carry.
That 98-yard rushing advantage gave the Chargers a much stronger offensive foundation.
Justin Herbert Was the Central Figure
Justin Herbert delivered the most important individual performance of the game.
His official passing line was:
- 28 completions
- 36 attempts
- 346 passing yards
- 9.6 yards per attempt
- 2 passing touchdowns
- 0 interceptions
- 1 sack for 10 yards
- 92.2 QBR
- 125.2 passer rating
Those numbers show more than basic efficiency. Herbert consistently pushed the ball downfield while avoiding the turnover that could have allowed Las Vegas to stay within striking distance.
A completion rate of 77.8 percent on 36 attempts is especially significant because Herbert was not simply relying on short, low-risk throws. His 9.6 yards per attempt demonstrates that the passing game generated substantial yardage per opportunity.
The Chargers also used Herbert as a runner. He carried the ball four times for 42 yards, averaging 10.5 yards per carry, with a long run of 41 yards.
That 41-yard run was particularly important when evaluating the overall offensive performance. It means Herbert was not merely a stationary distributor. When the Raiders defense created an opening, he had enough athletic ability to punish it.
Herbert’s Accuracy Created Offensive Stability
The Chargers completed 28 passes compared with 25 for Las Vegas, but the yardage difference was enormous.
Los Angeles gained 346 passing yards.
Las Vegas gained 225.
That created a 121-yard passing advantage for the Chargers despite only a three-completion difference.
The explanation is efficiency and explosive production. Herbert’s average of 9.6 yards per attempt was substantially higher than O’Connell’s 6.3.
That distinction matters when evaluating quarterback performance. Completion totals alone can make two passing performances appear similar, but the type and value of those completions can be dramatically different.
Quentin Johnston Produced the Biggest Receiving Performance
Quentin Johnston was the statistical standout among Chargers receivers.
His final line was:
- 13 receptions
- 186 yards
- 14.3 yards per reception
- 14 targets
- 39-yard long reception
- 0 touchdowns
Johnston accounted for more than half of the Chargers’ 346 receiving yards.
His 13 receptions were also nearly half of Los Angeles’ 28 completed passes.
That combination of volume and efficiency made him one of the central reasons the Chargers were able to sustain offensive pressure.
The play-by-play shows Herbert repeatedly looking for Johnston, including several meaningful completions during scoring drives. He caught a 37-yard pass during the first quarter and later added a 39-yard reception in the fourth quarter.
Interestingly, Johnston did not score a touchdown despite producing 186 yards. This is a useful reminder that receiving yardage and touchdown production measure different parts of offensive performance.
A receiver can dominate field position without finishing the drive himself.
That is exactly what Johnston did in this game.
Ladd McConkey Added Explosive Efficiency
Ladd McConkey finished with:
- 5 receptions
- 95 yards
- 19.0 yards per reception
- 8 targets
- 47-yard long reception
- 0 touchdowns
His five catches produced nearly 100 yards.
The 19.0-yard average is particularly impressive because it demonstrates how efficiently McConkey converted his opportunities.
While Johnston was the volume leader, McConkey was the efficiency specialist.
That created a difficult problem for the Raiders defense. Defenders could not simply focus on one receiver because Los Angeles had multiple players capable of generating significant yardage.
McConkey also played a role in the Chargers’ successful two-point conversion at the end of the first half. Herbert found McConkey for the conversion after connecting with DJ Chark for a six-yard touchdown.
Will Dissly and DJ Chark Finished Drives
Will Dissly caught five passes for 42 yards and one touchdown.
His touchdown came in the fourth quarter on a two-yard pass from Herbert, giving Los Angeles a 27-13 lead.
DJ Chark Jr. had only one reception, but it was an important one. His six-yard touchdown catch came with only 10 seconds remaining in the first half.
That is a perfect example of why raw reception totals should not always determine a player’s impact.
Chark caught one pass.
That one reception produced a touchdown.
J.K. Dobbins Provided Balance
J.K. Dobbins led the Chargers in rushing attempts with 18.
His final rushing line:
- 18 carries
- 63 yards
- 3.5 yards per carry
- 10-yard long
Dobbins did not produce a touchdown, but his workload was important.
Los Angeles did not need to abandon the run simply because Herbert was having success through the air. The Chargers continued giving Dobbins opportunities, which helped preserve offensive balance.
He also caught three passes for 12 yards.
The rushing average of 3.5 yards was not spectacular, but the 18-carry workload helped the Chargers maintain a dependable ground presence.
Hassan Haskins Delivered the Rushing Touchdown
Hassan Haskins carried 12 times for 33 yards, averaging 2.8 yards per attempt.
Those numbers look modest until the fourth quarter is considered.
Haskins finished a long Chargers drive with a two-yard rushing touchdown at 3:38 remaining. That drive covered 81 yards across 12 plays and consumed more than seven minutes.
That drive was one of the clearest examples of situational football in the game.
The Chargers did not need another explosive pass.
They needed to control the clock, move the chains and finish the game.
They did exactly that.
The Chargers Rushing Advantage Was More Important Than It Looked
Los Angeles finished with 137 rushing yards.
Las Vegas finished with only 39.
The 98-yard difference was enormous.
The Chargers averaged 3.9 yards per carry compared with 3.3 for the Raiders, but the more important issue was volume.
Los Angeles ran the ball 35 times.
Las Vegas ran it only 12 times.
That 23-attempt difference affected the structure of the entire game.
A team that can consistently threaten with both the pass and run forces defenders to respect more possibilities before the snap. The Chargers did not need to produce five or six yards on every carry. They needed the run game to remain functional while Herbert exploited favorable passing situations.
Raiders Quarterback Aidan O’Connell Had a Mixed Performance
Aidan O’Connell completed 24 of 34 passes for 214 yards.
His numbers included:
- 24 completions
- 34 attempts
- 214 yards
- 6.3 yards per attempt
- 2 touchdowns
- 1 interception
- 46.0 QBR
- 94.5 passer rating
O’Connell was accurate enough to complete 70.6 percent of his attempts, and two touchdown passes kept the Raiders on the scoreboard.
However, the Chargers limited the overall efficiency of the passing attack.
O’Connell averaged only 6.3 yards per attempt, compared with Herbert’s 9.6.
That 3.3-yard difference per attempt is substantial over a full game.
O’Connell also threw one interception, while Herbert avoided turnovers.
Desmond Ridder Saw Limited Action
Desmond Ridder completed one of two passes for 11 yards.
He did not throw a touchdown or interception.
His role was therefore limited, and O’Connell remained the primary passer for the Raiders.
Jakobi Meyers Was the Raiders’ Leading Receiver
Jakobi Meyers produced the strongest receiving performance for Las Vegas.
His numbers were:
- 9 receptions
- 123 yards
- 13.7 yards per reception
- 10 targets
- 25-yard long
- 1 touchdown
Meyers accounted for more than half of the Raiders’ receiving yardage.
His touchdown came in the second quarter on a 25-yard pass from O’Connell. The scoring play briefly gave Las Vegas a 10-3 lead.
That early advantage demonstrated that the Raiders were capable of attacking the Chargers defense.
The problem was maintaining that production throughout the game.
Brock Bowers Added a Late Touchdown
Brock Bowers finished with:
- 4 receptions
- 50 yards
- 12.5 yards per reception
- 9 targets
- 21-yard long
- 1 touchdown
His touchdown came with 25 seconds left in the fourth quarter, cutting the final margin to 14 points.
Bowers’ performance was productive, but his late touchdown did not materially change the outcome because Los Angeles had already built a comfortable lead.
His nine targets were also notable. The Raiders continued involving him heavily, particularly as they attempted to move quickly late in the game.
The Raiders’ Running Game Was the Biggest Offensive Weakness
Alexander Mattison led Las Vegas with six carries for only 20 yards.
O’Connell added 13 rushing yards on four carries, while Chris Collier produced six yards on two attempts.
The team finished with:
- 12 rushing attempts
- 39 rushing yards
- 3.3 yards per carry
- 0 rushing touchdowns
That was a major disadvantage.
The Raiders could not establish a dependable rushing threat, which made their offense increasingly reliant on O’Connell’s arm.
Once Los Angeles had a lead, the Chargers could focus more attention on the passing game without facing the same level of punishment from the ground attack.
Los Angeles Controlled the Scoring Rhythm
The quarter-by-quarter score provides another useful way to understand the game.
| Quarter | Chargers | Raiders |
| First | 3 | 3 |
| Second | 14 | 7 |
| Third | 3 | 3 |
| Fourth | 14 | 7 |
| Total | 34 | 20 |
The first quarter was even.
The second quarter gave Los Angeles separation.
The third quarter maintained the Chargers’ advantage.
The fourth quarter finished the game.
This pattern matters because the Chargers were not simply the beneficiaries of one lucky scoring burst. They outscored the Raiders in three of the four quarters and matched them in the other.
The Second Quarter Changed the Game
The Raiders entered the second quarter leading 3-0.
O’Connell then connected with Meyers for a 25-yard touchdown to make it 10-3.
Los Angeles responded with three points, another field goal and then a late touchdown.
By halftime, the Chargers had turned the game around and led 17-10.
That sequence showed the importance of responding after conceding a touchdown.
Rather than allowing the Raiders to dictate the game, Herbert and the Chargers offense consistently moved the ball and eventually took control.
Cameron Dicker Quietly Had a Major Impact
Cameron Dicker converted four of five field-goal attempts.
He made:
- 33 yards
- 32 yards
- 49 yards
- 20 yards
He finished with 14 points after also converting both extra-point attempts.
His only miss was a 51-yard attempt that went wide left in the first quarter.
Four successful field goals were crucial.
When an offense reaches scoring range but fails to score touchdowns, the kicker becomes especially important.
Dicker repeatedly converted those opportunities.
Daniel Carlson Was Perfect on Field Goals
Daniel Carlson went 2-for-2 on field goals for Las Vegas.
He converted attempts from 40 and 47 yards and added two extra points.
His eight points represented a reliable contribution, but the Raiders had fewer overall scoring opportunities because their offense struggled to sustain the same level of production as Los Angeles.
The Chargers Defense Won the Turnover Battle
Los Angeles recorded one interception.
Daiyan Henley intercepted a pass and returned it four yards.
The Raiders recorded no interceptions.
That gave Los Angeles the turnover advantage.
Although the Chargers did not record a sack, they registered five quarterback hits and three tackles for loss. The Raiders defense recorded one sack, five tackles for loss and three quarterback hits.
The defensive statistics show something interesting.
The Chargers did not overwhelm the Raiders with sacks.
Instead, their overall defensive impact came from limiting the running game, producing a turnover and creating enough pressure to disrupt selected plays.
What the Total Yardage Reveals
The Chargers accumulated:
- 346 passing yards
- 137 rushing yards
- 483 total offensive yards
The Raiders accumulated:
- 225 passing yards
- 39 rushing yards
- 264 total offensive yards
That creates a total-yardage difference of 219 yards.
This is arguably the clearest statistical explanation for the 34-20 result.
Los Angeles did not merely win the scoring battle.
It won the underlying offensive production battle by a substantial margin.
Why the Passing Difference Mattered
The Chargers gained 346 yards through the air.
The Raiders gained 225.
A 121-yard passing difference is difficult to overcome when the opponent also holds a major advantage on the ground.
Herbert’s 125.2 passer rating compared with O’Connell’s 94.5 also illustrates the difference in efficiency.
The most important part was turnover avoidance.
Herbert threw two touchdown passes and no interceptions.
O’Connell threw two touchdowns and one interception.
That single turnover did not tell the entire story, but it contributed to the Chargers’ advantage in possession quality.
A Closer Look at the Chargers’ Offensive Formula
The Chargers’ offensive success can be broken into four connected elements.
1. High-volume receiving
Johnston received 14 targets.
McConkey received eight.
Dissly received six.
This gave Herbert several dependable options.
2. Explosive gains
McConkey averaged 19.0 yards per reception.
Johnston averaged 14.3.
Herbert also added a 41-yard rushing play.
The offense consistently had access to chunk yardage.
3. Balanced rushing usage
Dobbins carried 18 times.
Haskins carried 12 times.
Herbert contributed four rushing attempts.
That prevented the offense from becoming one-dimensional.
4. Reliable finishing
Dicker converted four field goals.
Haskins scored a rushing touchdown.
Dissly and Chark scored receiving touchdowns.
The Chargers repeatedly turned successful drives into points.
A Closer Look at the Raiders’ Offensive Formula
Las Vegas relied heavily on its passing game.
Meyers was the leading target and yardage producer.
Bowers was heavily targeted and finished with a touchdown.
O’Connell completed 24 passes.
But the rushing attack produced only 39 yards.
That imbalance made the Raiders offense easier to diagnose as the game progressed.
When a team cannot consistently run the football, the defense can devote greater attention to the passing game, especially after the team falls behind.
The Play-by-Play Shows How Los Angeles Built Its Lead
The box score provides the final numbers, but the play-by-play provides context.
In the second quarter, the Chargers sustained a 15-play, 56-yard drive that consumed 7:36 before ending with a field goal.
That type of drive is valuable even when it produces only three points.
- It limits the opponent’s opportunities.
- It wears down the defense.
- It keeps the offense on the field.
- It also gives the coaching staff confidence that the offense can move the ball without depending entirely on explosive plays.
Later in the game, Los Angeles produced an even more decisive 12-play, 81-yard touchdown drive that consumed 7:12. Haskins finished that possession with a two-yard touchdown run.
Those two possessions illustrate the Chargers’ control.
The Fourth Quarter Was a Statement of Control
The Chargers entered the fourth quarter leading 20-13.
They then scored twice.
First came Dissly’s two-yard touchdown reception.
Later, Haskins finished the 81-yard drive with a rushing touchdown.
The Raiders scored a late touchdown through Bowers, but by then the outcome was essentially settled.
This is an important distinction when evaluating final statistics.
Las Vegas continued producing offense after the game was largely decided, which means some of its late yardage came in a situation where the Chargers were protecting a significant lead.
What the Game Says About Situational Efficiency
A strong statistical analysis should look beyond total numbers.
One of the most useful observations from this game is how Los Angeles converted offensive production into scoreboard pressure.
The Chargers did not score 34 points through touchdowns alone.
They combined:
- Four field goals
- Two passing touchdowns
- One rushing touchdown
- Successful extra points
- A successful two-point conversion
That scoring variety allowed Los Angeles to keep adding points even when individual drives did not reach the end zone.
Los Angeles Chargers vs Las Vegas Raiders Match Player Stats: Key Winners
Justin Herbert
Herbert was the clear quarterback standout.
His 346 yards, two touchdowns and zero interceptions gave Los Angeles an efficient passing foundation.
Quentin Johnston
Johnston’s 186 receiving yards were the most eye-catching receiving statistic in the game.
His 13 catches on 14 targets demonstrated both volume and reliability.
Ladd McConkey
McConkey averaged 19 yards per reception and produced 95 yards on only five catches.
That is elite explosive efficiency for the opportunities he received.
J.K. Dobbins
Dobbins provided the primary rushing workload with 18 attempts and 63 yards.
Hassan Haskins
Haskins was not efficient on a per-carry basis, but his 12 carries included the game’s important late rushing touchdown.
Cameron Dicker
Four field goals and two extra points gave Dicker 14 points.
Jakobi Meyers
Meyers was the Raiders’ leading receiver with 123 yards and one touchdown.
Brock Bowers
Bowers added 50 yards and a late touchdown while receiving nine targets.
Los Angeles Chargers vs Las Vegas Raiders Match Player Stats: Most Important Numbers
Several statistics deserve special attention when reviewing the matchup.
483 total yards for Los Angeles: This was the biggest offensive advantage.
264 total yards for Las Vegas: The Raiders struggled to produce enough overall offense.
346 passing yards for Herbert: This was the foundation of the Chargers’ offensive performance.
186 receiving yards for Johnston: This was the game’s biggest individual yardage total.
137 rushing yards for Los Angeles: The Chargers maintained enough balance to prevent the Raiders from focusing exclusively on Herbert.
39 rushing yards for Las Vegas: This limited the Raiders’ offensive flexibility.
0 interceptions for Herbert: Turnover-free quarterback play helped preserve the Chargers’ advantage.
1 interception by the Chargers defense: Henley’s takeaway contributed to the overall turnover edge.
14 points from Dicker: The kicker converted repeated scoring opportunities.
What the Stats Do Not Tell You
Box scores are valuable, but they cannot explain every part of a football game.
For example, Johnston’s 186 receiving yards do not automatically mean every catch was equally important.
Some receptions created first downs.
Others changed field position.
Some helped extend drives.
Likewise, Haskins’ 2.8 yards per carry does not capture the importance of his late touchdown and the carries he received while the Chargers were protecting their advantage.
Football is a situational sport.
The value of a play depends heavily on the down, distance, score and time remaining.
That is why the most useful interpretation of the numbers combines the box score with the sequence of possessions.
How to Read This Box Score Correctly
If you are using these numbers for fantasy football research, historical analysis, betting research or team evaluation, avoid focusing on only one category.
Instead, examine the statistics in layers.
Start with the quarterback
Look at completion percentage, yards per attempt, touchdowns, interceptions and passer rating.
Move to offensive volume
Check carries and targets.
Examine efficiency
Compare yards per attempt and yards per reception.
Check scoring production
Identify who actually finished drives.
Finally, examine context
Ask whether the production came during a competitive portion of the game or after the result was largely determined.
That final step can prevent misleading conclusions.
Fantasy Football Interpretation
From a fantasy perspective, this matchup had several noteworthy performances.
Herbert’s two passing touchdowns and 346 yards gave him strong production, while his 42 rushing yards added another useful component.
Johnston’s 186 receiving yards made him the biggest yardage performer among the receivers.
McConkey’s 95 yards were impressive considering he needed only five receptions to reach that total.
Dissly and Chark benefited from touchdown production.
For the Raiders, Meyers’ 123 receiving yards and touchdown made him the most productive receiving option, while Bowers remained involved with nine targets and a touchdown.
However, fantasy interpretation should always distinguish between one-game production and sustainable usage patterns.
Historical Importance of the Result
The Chargers entered the game at 10-6 and improved to 11-6 with the victory, while the Raiders finished 4-13. ESPN’s game record lists Los Angeles as 6-3 on the road and Las Vegas as 2-6 at home.
The victory also secured the Chargers the AFC’s No. 5 seed, according to the associated game report.
That context matters because this was not merely a late-season exhibition.
Los Angeles had postseason positioning at stake.
The Chargers therefore had a meaningful reason to maintain offensive efficiency and finish the game strongly.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the final score between the Chargers and Raiders?
The Los Angeles Chargers defeated the Las Vegas Raiders 34-20.
Who was the leading passer in the game?
Justin Herbert was the leading passer. He completed 28 of 36 attempts for 346 yards, two touchdowns and no interceptions.
Who led the Chargers in receiving?
Quentin Johnston led Los Angeles with 13 receptions for 186 yards on 14 targets.
Who led the Raiders in receiving?
Jakobi Meyers led the Raiders with nine receptions for 123 yards and one touchdown.
How many rushing yards did the Chargers have?
The Chargers recorded 137 rushing yards on 35 attempts.
How many rushing yards did the Raiders have?
The Raiders recorded only 39 rushing yards on 12 attempts.
Conclusion
The los angeles chargers vs las vegas raiders match player stats reveal a game that was decided by more than the final 34-20 score.
Justin Herbert delivered an efficient and explosive passing performance, completing 28 of 36 attempts for 346 yards, two touchdowns and no interceptions. Quentin Johnston emerged as the game’s biggest receiving producer with 186 yards, while Ladd McConkey added 95 yards at an impressive 19.0 yards per catch.
The Chargers also maintained offensive balance through 137 rushing yards. J.K. Dobbins handled the largest share of the rushing workload, while Hassan Haskins supplied the decisive rushing touchdown late in the fourth quarter.
For Las Vegas, Aidan O’Connell produced 214 passing yards and two touchdowns, while Jakobi Meyers led the receiving corps with 123 yards and a touchdown. Brock Bowers added 50 yards and a late score. The problem was the lack of a dependable rushing attack, with the Raiders producing only 39 rushing yards.
The statistical gap was therefore substantial. Los Angeles finished with 483 total yards compared with 264 for Las Vegas. The Chargers also won the turnover battle, avoided an interception from Herbert and repeatedly converted offensive possessions into points.
The most important lesson from the matchup is that individual statistics become much more meaningful when they are viewed in game context. Johnston’s receiving volume, Herbert’s passing efficiency, Dobbins’ workload, Haskins’ late touchdown, Meyers’ production and Bowers’ targets all contributed to a broader picture of how the game developed.
For anyone researching this matchup, the box score and play-by-play together provide a much clearer understanding than the final score alone.
